I have read several books on how to do qualitative research and this is BY FAR the clearest explanation I’ve seen on how to structure the findings section. This is a true service to the field!
Thank you very helpful for me... It can be difficult to distinguish between discussing, analysing and just writing the findings... I struggled quite a bit and this is just a rescuer for me.
Brilliant stuff, I've just started with my results and analysis chapter and I found the lesson to be very informative. Thank you so much. How should we reference your material, would the following suffice? Weaver-Hightower, M. (2014, March 17). Writing Qualitative Findings Paragraphs [Video file]. Available from: ua-cam.com/video/mmKuvwk8x84/v-deo.html
Hi Marcus, when you were mentioning the C part I had doubts about whether talking in the Comment part will override the functions of the Discussion section. I went back to your Oatmeal article and found that you did not use a Discussion section in your paper. Does it mean that the SQC combines the Findings and the Discussion sections together into one? Thanks
That's a fantastic question. I think the Commentary parts can help a great deal in obviating the need for the traditional discussion section--you can weave the discussion throughout the findings. But using commentary doesn't have to remove the need for discussion. You can have both if you want or need. It really depends on how much analysis you are doing in the commentary: are you really digging into the larger meanings for the whole paper's argument or are you simply explaining the connections between the quote and one theme or subtheme? If you're doing the latter, it's a good idea to use a discussion section to wrap all the themes into a coherent narrative that answers your research question(s). There are tons of examples of doing it both ways (just findings or findings and discussion), and some disciplines are much more likely to demand the traditional organization that includes the discussion section. Still, even if you have a discussion, some comment should be present for each quotation, even if just to reinforce how it illustrates the paragraph's thesis statement, to point out any particular words or phrases of importance, or to make connections to other ideas. Thanks for the question.
@@marcusweaver-hightower8091 Marcus, thank you so much for this informative response. I am currently writing up my first paper ever to a journal, and I have learnt a lot from you. Thank you very much again for your time and effort.
In as much as this sounds interesting... I find it a bit much on just the chapter of findings. I have analysed and reviewed a lot of qualitative studies but non have mentioned this style of reporting findings. The reasons are that S & C in SQC are taking so much of what should be in the next chapter of discussion. Also, for researchers that has about 7-12 participants, how does just quoting one persons response in a paragraph give such a well balanced report of the theme underwhich the quotes are stated. Lastly, is there any article or studies by which this SQC are based on?
Hi Allexius. Thanks for watching. I think of this as a formula only in the loosest sense. It's really my sense of how most of the best researchers do qualitative writing. If you're interested in reading a bit more, it's also a major part of my book How to Write Qualitative Research. Not everyone does their paragraphing this way of course. I don't know of anyone else who has specifically talked about qualitative writing this way; that's why I wrote it! My best advice for "validating" this approach would be to look at what folks in the discipline of composition studies say about paragraphing.
Hi, thank you so much for this. I am currently writing my dissertation and have to divide sections into results and discussion. You refer to "findings" - thus is this the method you would use for a results section? or discussion?
More what people would refer to as a "results" chapter in the traditional 5-chapter dissertation. Of course, many write qualitative dissertations that don't have a separate discussion chapter; they just blend discussion and results together because that division isn't quite as natural for qualitative research.
Excellent way to show the formula of writing qualitative findings but not compromising with the nuances and depth of interpretations of the findings. Thank you, Marcus.
Very helpful. I have completed my dissertation and used qualitative data. I didn't use any particular method for presenting the findings. I kind of made it up. But, i like this style.
What is your advise in cases where, there are 2 or three great quotes for a theme? do you weave them together or chose one an perhaps the others in the comment section of the paragraph?
Thanks very much. Watching this clip for the 2nd time. The SQC formula is wonderful and helpful but I feel its a bit heavy for the presentation of findings. I am thinking that the content for the S and C are a bit much? Thanks
Thanks for the comment. I get this question a lot, actually, so I'm glad to have a chance to explain a bit. Too often, I think, writers tend to think that a quotation should "speak for itself." They also get nervous about "imposing" their own interpretations on what a participant has said, as if that takes away their "voice." While it's understandable where this impulse comes from, it misses out on one of the basic understandings about readers that writers must remember: readers don't always think like you. They haven't been to the site, met the people, or pondered over the data for weeks and months, and they often read skeptically. If you don't frame a quotation in the way you think it fits in your argument and where the quote comes from (the S) and then explain what you think the quote means for your larger argument (the C), people will read the quote very differently than you will. The S and the C do slightly different things, and they are crucial to making your argument. Without them you're just throwing out seemingly random quotations and asking your reader to do all the work--but without anything to go on. And, to make you feel better about the imposition issue, the quote has to actually accomplish what you say it does. Because you are including raw data in the form of a quote, readers are still able to judge whether they think it says what you say it means. So the Q is a kind of check on the S and C's validity.
Thank you very much! Extremely helpful and informative. My query is: Would this SQC method also be applied for a Results section of a thesis? Traditionally, we were told to just report the results! The 'C' part needs to be included in a Discussion section. Can we then just do a SQ for Results? Thanks, again, for a great video!
I think it works for a results section of a thesis, but I do think the "commentary" part of the paragraph would be a bit different. In a journal article or discussion section, you put a lot of emphasis on making meanings and connections. In a results section, you want to mainly, as you say, report the findings without editorializing. (That's the benefit of all the space you get in a thesis!) The "C" part of the paragraph in the results, though, still needs to be there to point out any important phrases or ideas, show how it connects to the questions being asked, or in some cases to give context or summary. Even in the results you don't want to leave a paragraph on a quote because it asks a lot of readers to intuit what it all means.
One more query Marcus...What happens if your qualitative statements are less than 40 words? I'd assume you keep them in the normal body of the text? I've also seen some papers put them within quote marks and some italicize them. What do you recommend? Thanks,again!
Prasidh Ramson It depends on your citation style, but in APA, yes, less than 40 words of quotation should be integrated into the normal paragraph. For a manuscript in APA, no italics or any other special formatting (and keep it double spaced). Just normal text indented half an inch.
I have read several books on how to do qualitative research and this is BY FAR the clearest explanation I’ve seen on how to structure the findings section. This is a true service to the field!
Thank you. This was helpful, specifically SQC simplified the process.
Thank you very helpful for me... It can be difficult to distinguish between discussing, analysing and just writing the findings... I struggled quite a bit and this is just a rescuer for me.
Brilliant stuff, I've just started with my results and analysis chapter and I found the lesson to be very informative. Thank you so much. How should we reference your material, would the following suffice? Weaver-Hightower, M. (2014, March 17). Writing Qualitative Findings Paragraphs [Video file]. Available from: ua-cam.com/video/mmKuvwk8x84/v-deo.html
Thank you very much. Currently writing up my results and discussion section of my dissertation and this has helped me loads!
Hi Marcus, when you were mentioning the C part I had doubts about whether talking in the Comment part will override the functions of the Discussion section. I went back to your Oatmeal article and found that you did not use a Discussion section in your paper. Does it mean that the SQC combines the Findings and the Discussion sections together into one? Thanks
That's a fantastic question. I think the Commentary parts can help a great deal in obviating the need for the traditional discussion section--you can weave the discussion throughout the findings. But using commentary doesn't have to remove the need for discussion. You can have both if you want or need. It really depends on how much analysis you are doing in the commentary: are you really digging into the larger meanings for the whole paper's argument or are you simply explaining the connections between the quote and one theme or subtheme? If you're doing the latter, it's a good idea to use a discussion section to wrap all the themes into a coherent narrative that answers your research question(s). There are tons of examples of doing it both ways (just findings or findings and discussion), and some disciplines are much more likely to demand the traditional organization that includes the discussion section. Still, even if you have a discussion, some comment should be present for each quotation, even if just to reinforce how it illustrates the paragraph's thesis statement, to point out any particular words or phrases of importance, or to make connections to other ideas. Thanks for the question.
@@marcusweaver-hightower8091 Marcus, thank you so much for this informative response. I am currently writing up my first paper ever to a journal, and I have learnt a lot from you. Thank you very much again for your time and effort.
Thanks, you asked the question that was on my lips
Thank you! I love the format, concise and specific.
In as much as this sounds interesting... I find it a bit much on just the chapter of findings.
I have analysed and reviewed a lot of qualitative studies but non have mentioned this style of reporting findings. The reasons are that S & C in SQC are taking so much of what should be in the next chapter of discussion. Also, for researchers that has about 7-12 participants, how does just quoting one persons response in a paragraph give such a well balanced report of the theme underwhich the quotes are stated.
Lastly, is there any article or studies by which this SQC are based on?
This was very clear. concise, and well executed. Thank you for your support!
Thanks - very helpful and clear to follow. Using examples made it very easy to put into practice.
Is there any literature or articles validating this formula? I need to know for my bachelors thesis.
Hi Allexius. Thanks for watching. I think of this as a formula only in the loosest sense. It's really my sense of how most of the best researchers do qualitative writing. If you're interested in reading a bit more, it's also a major part of my book How to Write Qualitative Research. Not everyone does their paragraphing this way of course. I don't know of anyone else who has specifically talked about qualitative writing this way; that's why I wrote it! My best advice for "validating" this approach would be to look at what folks in the discipline of composition studies say about paragraphing.
Very helpful and easy
Thanks a lot
very helpful thank you very much
Hi, thank you so much for this. I am currently writing my dissertation and have to divide sections into results and discussion. You refer to "findings" - thus is this the method you would use for a results section? or discussion?
More what people would refer to as a "results" chapter in the traditional 5-chapter dissertation. Of course, many write qualitative dissertations that don't have a separate discussion chapter; they just blend discussion and results together because that division isn't quite as natural for qualitative research.
Thank you very much, I am now writing my dissertation and I did not know the SQC approach, but after watching your video I think I am ready to go.
I am struggling with my 20000 words. Can u help me
@@asmasultana2732 I think I can
Can u speak on mail?
Thanks, this was really helpful.
Very helpful indeed. Can we access the paper "Oatmeal facials and sock wrestling"? Thanks
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR POSTING THIS!!!!!
Excellent way to show the formula of writing qualitative findings but not compromising with the nuances and depth of interpretations of the findings. Thank you, Marcus.
Thank you so much!
Thank you, thank you, thank you!! This is hugely helpful for my thesis.
Thanks. The SQC process saved me a hell of trouble. Thank you again.
Good stuff does not have a million views, you seeeeeee now. I spent days looking for answers.. thank you thank you..
Sir, if I follow this SQC patter for my result section, can I forego writing of a separate discussion section?
Hey, really loved your video. It's helping me a lot. Thank you!
Fantastic presentation. The best. Thank you very much.
wow thanks so much, im so glad i found this, very helpful
Thanks very much. This is extremely helpful to me.
Very helpful. I have completed my dissertation and used qualitative data. I didn't use any particular method for presenting the findings. I kind of made it up. But, i like this style.
Excellent for a new research student!
Your has given a great analytial view about topic for the students
This is extremely helpful, thank you
A fantastic explanation. Thank you
What is your advise in cases where, there are 2 or three great quotes for a theme? do you weave them together or chose one an perhaps the others in the comment section of the paragraph?
Thank you so much this is really helpful. Regards
Thank you! Great explanation!
Thank you very much for this !!!
this video was uneducational and im fat
lifesaver for my paper!!!!! Thanks!
Great video! Thank you
Thanks for this very helpful video. I wonder if you have another video or any other resource on how to write the discussion chapter?
really helpful thank very much!
please give outline of findings chapter
Very helpful. Thanks
Very helpful - Thanks!
Thanks very much. Watching this clip for the 2nd time. The SQC formula is wonderful and helpful but I feel its a bit heavy for the presentation of findings. I am thinking that the content for the S and C are a bit much? Thanks
Thanks for the comment. I get this question a lot, actually, so I'm glad to have a chance to explain a bit. Too often, I think, writers tend to think that a quotation should "speak for itself." They also get nervous about "imposing" their own interpretations on what a participant has said, as if that takes away their "voice." While it's understandable where this impulse comes from, it misses out on one of the basic understandings about readers that writers must remember: readers don't always think like you. They haven't been to the site, met the people, or pondered over the data for weeks and months, and they often read skeptically. If you don't frame a quotation in the way you think it fits in your argument and where the quote comes from (the S) and then explain what you think the quote means for your larger argument (the C), people will read the quote very differently than you will. The S and the C do slightly different things, and they are crucial to making your argument. Without them you're just throwing out seemingly random quotations and asking your reader to do all the work--but without anything to go on. And, to make you feel better about the imposition issue, the quote has to actually accomplish what you say it does. Because you are including raw data in the form of a quote, readers are still able to judge whether they think it says what you say it means. So the Q is a kind of check on the S and C's validity.
I enjoyed this presentation! It is valuable to enrich my findings section.
Thank you for sharing!
It seems to be a fantastic tactic! I'll be surely following this structure! (7 years after you had it posted)
lol
Gracias, esto es oro puro!
Great advice about Results section - thank you! Will definitely re-look at it with this in mind.
S.Q.C. is not an acronym.
thank you, it was helpful.
how to reference this source in text?
Quite useful!! thanks a lot!!
really helpful, thanks you
Thank you!🙏🏾
Thank you!
Thank yoy
thank you
thank you
thank you
Thank you very much! Extremely helpful and informative. My query is: Would this SQC method also be applied for a Results section of a thesis? Traditionally, we were told to just report the results! The 'C' part needs to be included in a Discussion section. Can we then just do a SQ for Results? Thanks, again, for a great video!
I think it works for a results section of a thesis, but I do think the "commentary" part of the paragraph would be a bit different. In a journal article or discussion section, you put a lot of emphasis on making meanings and connections. In a results section, you want to mainly, as you say, report the findings without editorializing. (That's the benefit of all the space you get in a thesis!) The "C" part of the paragraph in the results, though, still needs to be there to point out any important phrases or ideas, show how it connects to the questions being asked, or in some cases to give context or summary. Even in the results you don't want to leave a paragraph on a quote because it asks a lot of readers to intuit what it all means.
One more query Marcus...What happens if your qualitative statements are less than 40 words? I'd assume you keep them in the normal body of the text? I've also seen some papers put them within quote marks and some italicize them. What do you recommend? Thanks,again!
Prasidh Ramson It depends on your citation style, but in APA, yes, less than 40 words of quotation should be integrated into the normal paragraph. For a manuscript in APA, no italics or any other special formatting (and keep it double spaced). Just normal text indented half an inch.
Great stuff! Thanks, again.
thank you
Thank you so much!