CLJ 4 (PART 1)- CRIMINAL LAW (BOOK 2) |100 BOARD QUESTIONS (NEW TOS BASED)

[@andreiandasas5449]

43, dapat po rebellion sir

[@2e-udidekemichael909]

Yung #32 po hindi po ba proof beyond reasonable doubt ang answer? Kase degree of proof po yung tanong. Paclarify po sana sir. Thank you

[@kaymartaquino4018]

Sa 86 po bat Act of lasciviousness , mas pasok ang unjust vexation, actually walang sagot ngapo eh
Kasi dapat may lewd design sa act of lasciviousness . And wala naman doon sa tanong po.
Just saying

[@micopaoloperiabras4721]

43, bakit po teason? dapat po ata sagot diyan is rebellion

[@lapurgstv4933]

I got 56 only ,explore more thing .

[@StudySmarter.NotHarder]

@@lapurgstv4933 yes po

[@micopaoloperiabras4721]

bakit po ba sa 81 is none of the above? e pasok din po siya sa bigamy?

[@kaymartaquino4018]

Hindi applicable ang bigamy or can't prosecuted ang isang tao dahil sa tinatawag na Territoriality principle (Criminal law)
Makakasuhan lang ng bigamy if Asa Philippines siya

[@joshinspirationaltv1887]

Bakit po Terrorism pwde pa explain po

[@StudySmarter.NotHarder]

@@joshinspirationaltv1887 anong number po?

[@joshinspirationaltv1887]

Question no.15 po

[@ricoornopia5775]

Lagyan mo Ng explanation para kaming manonood di malito kawawa Naman kaming slow learnings .....bakit ho daw terrorism🥴

[@genevaybs]

please give comment in a kindly manner ​@@ricoornopia5775