Inside AC-130 Super Advanced Cockpit Demolishing Targets From The Air

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 жов 2023
  • Welcome back to The Daily Aviation for a feature on the US Air Force gunship that was born from a cargo plane, the AC-130J Ghostrider.
    Voice, text and video editing belong to The Daily Aviation, any use of these content without permission is forbidden.
    Don't forget to subscribe us on Facebook or Twitter.
    / dailyaviationarchive
    / dailymda
    You have a question or you would like to send us footage. Send us a message.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 93

  • @Shaderunner7153
    @Shaderunner7153 7 місяців тому +3

    I flew as air crew in C-130Q I love the 130’s

  • @Paulschultz-ny6hz
    @Paulschultz-ny6hz 8 місяців тому +8

    This ship has come a long since Viet Nam so sophisticated it's so unreal.

    • @ironroad18
      @ironroad18 7 місяців тому

      Agreed
      But even during Vietnam it was considered high-tech/state of the art. One of the first combat aircraft to employ FLIR and low-light TV.

  • @tomuehrke2782
    @tomuehrke2782 8 місяців тому +7

    NEVER let anyone talk sh*t about the Air Force! 'You r Savinng Grace....

    • @RossNaylor-nh5uv
      @RossNaylor-nh5uv 7 місяців тому

      Yep I'm ex British army and we always forget the importance of our air force these guys are as much hero's as any ground based unit they fly in and save our asses multiple times I love hearing stories about the American 160th s.o.a.r those guys are pros anyway godbless our king our country and our people serving us each and every day biiiiig thanks to you all for your service

  • @dragovichify
    @dragovichify 8 місяців тому +12

    Seeing this video reminds me of the AC130 mission in cod 4

    • @teeoatmark7062
      @teeoatmark7062 7 місяців тому

      ナカーマ(*≧ω≦)ノ♥️
      DS版で死ぬほどやりましたわ♪

    • @fermentedfruit
      @fermentedfruit 7 місяців тому

      😂 yea fr

  • @bonthon5624
    @bonthon5624 7 місяців тому

    ពិតជាអស្ចារ្យ 🇺🇸🥰💪👍🏾

  • @khingkham5930
    @khingkham5930 8 місяців тому +1

    Yes

  • @VerlitaSaprudin
    @VerlitaSaprudin 7 місяців тому +1

    C 130 kapal pesawat Hercules. AU. Perdamaian negara Palestina. Bantu kota Gaza. Bendera Palestina. Negara kesatuan RI.

  • @gottz5247
    @gottz5247 7 місяців тому

    かっこいい😍

  • @susciv
    @susciv 7 місяців тому

    Do a hanger pop!

  • @VerlitaSaprudin
    @VerlitaSaprudin 7 місяців тому

    C 130. Pesawat Hercules. Angkatan udara. Perdamaian negara Palestina. Kota Gaza. Negara kesatuan RI.

  • @HiboshiRuru
    @HiboshiRuru 8 місяців тому

    Favorite Weapons
    Like the thunder of Zeus !! America can weaponize myths too?

  • @adeilori6659
    @adeilori6659 7 місяців тому +1

    It’s the tactics employed that makes a difference. The concept of a gunship is a proven entity whether against a sophisticated foe or insurgent ones.

    • @Melthornal
      @Melthornal 7 місяців тому

      gunships absolutely do not work against sophisticated enemies. Sophisticated enemies have their air defense and stealth fighters shoot down the gunship before it even gets close enough to fire a single shot.

  • @grigri555
    @grigri555 7 місяців тому +2

    Против какого врага такая техника? В условиях современного конфликта он даже не долетит до цели.

  • @jordannerdboy4117
    @jordannerdboy4117 7 місяців тому

    The reaper is cool

  • @atomotron
    @atomotron Місяць тому

    Yeah, it is fun fighting an enemy which does not have any air defense, isn't it?

  • @user-cy1fj6vg9z
    @user-cy1fj6vg9z 6 місяців тому

    弾薬を手作業で積み込むてのがいいなー

  • @user-iw2mg5kk5i
    @user-iw2mg5kk5i 7 місяців тому +4

    공군없는 적에게는 공포의대상..........30mm아팟치건도 ㅎㄷㄷ한데;;;

  • @nero5379_
    @nero5379_ 7 місяців тому

    Is this planes cabin pressurised

  • @mrdan2898
    @mrdan2898 7 місяців тому

    Why they call it a link less system. I'm sure we could see the links, even the soldier was picking up the links. Although maybe I'm mistaken.

  • @volodymyrgongalo1982
    @volodymyrgongalo1982 8 місяців тому +1

    Ця система може працювати там де полавлена ППО.

    • @grigri555
      @grigri555 7 місяців тому +1

      Да для любого абрека с переносным зрк самым старым советским это будет легчайшая мишень. И отправятся бравые парни с игрушками в руках вместо оружия на тот свет...

  • @tomuehrke2782
    @tomuehrke2782 8 місяців тому +1

    Guess they don't have tf to worry about a green ac dropping a mag flare in the bay of the Vucan...ya know or ya don't..,.

  • @damez90
    @damez90 7 місяців тому +1

    only works on enemy without air defense.

    • @Iluvlivinglife
      @Iluvlivinglife 7 місяців тому +1

      That can be arranged

    • @lanepeterson2348
      @lanepeterson2348 7 місяців тому

      That’s kinda how airplanes work buddy, you think the AC130 is out there alone? air superiority has been an essential tactic Since 1914.

  • @stephensabaratnam1644
    @stephensabaratnam1644 7 місяців тому

    It’s a Legacy model in the video, not a 130J. The props are a dead give away..

  • @VerlitaSaprudin
    @VerlitaSaprudin 7 місяців тому

    C 130 pesawat Hercules. AU. Bantu kapten benzein. AD. USA. Bantu perdamaian negara Palestina. Kota Gaza di Hamas. Negara kesatuan Indonesia.

  • @Jairienafaire330
    @Jairienafaire330 7 місяців тому

    This is when you are in an existing area of ​​air defenses, but if you mess with the wrong side you will be burned up in the sky in a matter of seconds.

  • @VietHoang-sb2qg
    @VietHoang-sb2qg 7 місяців тому

    Máy bay to chậm ko an toàn dể trúng đan, chi cần 3 chiếc chiến đấu bay Lên gần đung vào là xong

  • @illegalsmile8625
    @illegalsmile8625 3 місяці тому

    hello, I play DCS World. Can I get a job?

  • @VerlitaSaprudin
    @VerlitaSaprudin 7 місяців тому

    F 35 lochket Martin. Pesawat Sukhoi tempur. Batasan negara Palestina di kota Gaza. Palestina.

  • @cotal240463
    @cotal240463 7 місяців тому +1

    ну это где нет пво и пзрк. а так пугать аборигенов, по выстроенному эшелону пво-смертники

  • @Wtf95
    @Wtf95 7 місяців тому

    only picture... not working

  • @stephenmead8183
    @stephenmead8183 7 місяців тому +1

    Do those remote drone operators still qualify for a action medal. .

  • @4i4ofester72
    @4i4ofester72 7 місяців тому +2

    Unfortunately this aircraft works only against lower tech countrys in perfect conditions. Never the less it's interesting machine.

    • @lanepeterson2348
      @lanepeterson2348 7 місяців тому

      Not true, gunships have proven effectiveness in all kinds of applications. Against a modern foe, air superiority would allow highly effective use of gunships.

  • @thango137
    @thango137 7 місяців тому

    Gặp Việt nam thành sắt vụn

  • @BD7PA
    @BD7PA 7 місяців тому

    被封面骗进来.....

  • @monyetcabean5943
    @monyetcabean5943 7 місяців тому +1

    According to their version, their military equipment is very sophisticated, but they only win in film games. If they were in a real war, they would always lose.

    • @JoeMama-qd1tw
      @JoeMama-qd1tw 7 місяців тому +1

      They beat iraq ass back in the 90s. Iraq was one of the most powerful country in the world back then courtesy of the Soviet Union

  • @user-rp3ot1gr4q
    @user-rp3ot1gr4q 7 місяців тому

    한국이라면 ... 진작에 포탄 탑재, 장전하고 쏘는 것 까지 모두 자동화 했을 것 같다.

  • @hdcc-ei3sd
    @hdcc-ei3sd 8 місяців тому +1

    เอาไปช่วยอิสราเอลในตอนนี้

  • @badgumby9544
    @badgumby9544 7 місяців тому

    The US depends too heavily on technology. Which is most often down for malfunctions and repairs. The F22 fighters, at any given time, usually has approx 42% of them grounded for various reasons. In real world scenarios a vast majority of the technology will be useless. Plus, personnel competency will continue to decline. And be harder to recruit competent people to operate sophisticated equipment. We know how WWIII will be fought. WWIV will be fought with sticks and stones.

    • @jcak552
      @jcak552 6 місяців тому +1

      Keep believing that… having been AD, this is wrong. The personnel rise to the occasion…

  • @user-driver77
    @user-driver77 8 місяців тому

    미사일이 날아다니는 전쟁터에서 저런 비행기에서 쏘는 포가 효율성이 얼마나 있을지 의문이다.~

    • @kirisakekim5252
      @kirisakekim5252 7 місяців тому +1

      그 미사일 ac130 건쉽도 쏠 수 있고, 애초에 건쉽의 목적은 적 차량무력화, 적 부대산개 및 교란, 건물 정밀포격 등이다.
      훈련이 아닌 실제 투입시엔 고고도 관측드론, 호위목적 전투기, ac130, 전투기 급유용 c130 등이 동시출격한다.
      얘네들만 단독출격 하느냐? 육군에서도 당연히 공격헬기 및 a10, 지상군 등을 함께 출격시키지.
      적 미사일 올 게 두려워서 병력을 놀린다? 그럴거면 무기는 왜 만들고 전쟁은 왜 하냐? 애시당초 미사일 방어체계 사드도 미국에서 운용중인 시스템이고, 땅덩어리 좁은 한반도에서도 한국형 3축체계로 적 미사일 발사에 대한 대비를 하는데?
      뇌가 있고 군필이라면 미사일 1발보다 105mm 고폭탄이나 백린탄 상공정밀포격이 더 효용성 있다는걸 알텐데~

    • @andersh6227
      @andersh6227 7 місяців тому

      Comming from an expert 😂😂

  • @GaneshMushika
    @GaneshMushika 6 місяців тому

    Inconsistent and mistitled.

  • @Anubis7169
    @Anubis7169 8 місяців тому +17

    Most guys who operate the guns on these end up with cancer 10-20 years later. Goodluck with Veteran's Affairs, LOL

    • @stephenmead8183
      @stephenmead8183 7 місяців тому

      That’s sad. Best wishes to all who have been affected. You can beat it

    • @Part_121_Wannabe
      @Part_121_Wannabe 7 місяців тому +2

      Why cancer? Elaborate

    • @Anubis7169
      @Anubis7169 7 місяців тому

      the entire inside of the plane is full of lead particulates and depleted uranium. Not to mention your hearing will be toast in a matter of weeks@@Part_121_Wannabe

    • @Jimithy98
      @Jimithy98 7 місяців тому

      @@Part_121_Wannabelead from the shells causes cancer

    • @kentwilliams3326
      @kentwilliams3326 7 місяців тому

      What connection between flying an cancer is there? There should be no radioactivity on AC-130s

  • @truethought2581
    @truethought2581 7 місяців тому

    30 years ago ppl said those of us that predicted computer assisted or computer warfare told us to put the bong down. Seems to me I.C. run equipment is conducting warfare operations.......
    Hmmmmm..........
    Seems maybe those ppl needed to put the bong down.
    UAV's everywhere, doing everything.

  • @jordannerdboy4117
    @jordannerdboy4117 7 місяців тому

    Interesting how the ballistic noise inside the aircraft is silenced

  • @khankurblaj3934
    @khankurblaj3934 7 місяців тому +1

    you can practice that agains african tribes but not against serious armies, it'd be a sittind duck...but yenks mostly fight only if 1:100 odds

    • @andersh6227
      @andersh6227 7 місяців тому +2

      Bend over goatboy 😂😂

    • @khankurblaj3934
      @khankurblaj3934 7 місяців тому

      @@andersh6227 after your mother finish her (everyday's) bjob

    • @lanepeterson2348
      @lanepeterson2348 7 місяців тому +1

      Lol, a sitting duck with an AWACS and four f16’s or f22’s nearby.
      This aircraft would never be used in uncontrolled airspace, which we would create…by force.