@Herbert Erdferkel Where do you get off with such a god complex? Or is it simply the keyboard warrior one we keep seeing? I was simply voicing an option. And if you read my entire comment you would see I mentioned others footage. That falls under "military and production companies". Clearly you are a tad slow.
Aaron Seet I wish after WW2, NATO and the Soviets just kept making heavy tanks like the IS. Eventually we would’ve gotten a moon gun on a tank and I just feel like we missed out
@@martijn31101969 this is not meant.what is meant is that handcrafted chains will do the same job industrial welded ones to hold on tools on the tank during a combat situation. the one just takes longer to assemble. and time is a important factor. sometimes simple solutions do a better job.
Secret tank development? Not so much. Secret stealth fighter programs, otoh ... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MBB_Lampyridae www.aerosociety.com/news/lout-of-the-black/
@@yukiakito3083 Um, and? He was talking of a Maus 2, not the original one, thus (jokingly I assume) implying Germany had a secret tank program after WWII or right now. I pointed out that's not the case (LeoII AX and MGCS programs both arent really secret in that sense). But it DID have secret stealth fighter programs.
@@Berek71182 they used cats and the Germans continued using cats because they don’t give a fuck about stupid things like that, and that’s a good thing.
@@bassbusterx well hard to discribe. When THW engine is out but all systems aktivated its a light sound. Like ringing. When THW engine starts and you move hell breaks lose and you can only comunicate by the onboard com system. When your tank shoots its OK its much louder When the tank beside you shoots. Hard to discribe...
@@marcelwachter1764 It is strange. I also noticed. Even when you're standing next to the tank outside, a shot isn't very loud. But when you are a few meters away, it is a blow that you feel in your chest and go through your whole body.
i kinda hate and love u tin soldiers :)….u scared the shit out of my squad once when u guys came racin full throttel in the direction of our forward observation post from behind…..and past us.Tbh i had only 2 words in my mind....schei+++ and idi++. :)
Same here. Loved being on the Abrams while I was doing my stint as a tanker in 2/66 AR 2nd ADF. Because we were the only combat unit from the U.S. in NORTHAG our sister unit was a German unit and they had the Leo2. We got to do quite a bit of cross training with them and, if I had to go to war on anything but an Abrams it would definitely a Leo. Great tank.
@Joshua N. Ajang best guess I can give is they went with the 105mm as opposed to the German 120mm because, at the time, Germany had not yet got the semicombustable cases quite "right". Provisions were made in the M1 turret to mount the 120 at a later date. The US HAD a 120mm gun prior to the M1, it was mounted in the M103 heavy tank. I believe it was the same gun that the Brits mounted in the Conqueror, or it was very similar. Both used separate loading ammo. Brits had one loader, we had 2. The US MBT70 used the same gun as the M60A2 and the M551 Sheridan. The MBT70 project was, intriguing, but the technologies weren't mature enough at the time. Many features an ideas of the MBT70 did make it into the Abrams, and possibly even the Leo.
@@n5syr01 did u ever get the chance to crawl around a leo2? i can only imagine that a large part of international exercises is so u guys can check out each other's shit! i know loads of US troops in germany are desperate to get their german weapon schuetzen badge (given its one of the few foreign awards US soldiers are allowed to display on their uniform
@@innouniversedoineedthis challanger 2 didnt come out, way long after leopard 2 came into service in the Wehr at the time when the Leo 2s roll out the production line the MoD still bickering how they counter the Leo 2s. By that time the British still could learn and study the Leo 2s so they could make their future Challanger 2 tanks better than the Leo 2s, but eventually its mostly equal. British could defeat the Germans in wars but they couldn't defeat their engineers in designing armored vehicles and MBTs, deal with it.
I find it doubtful, or this tank commander doesn't know what he is talking about. Countries buy Leopards instead of Abrams because it's much better deal. You can get latest version of Leopard or inferior export version of Abrams and Leos are cheaper.
@@Brix_H Germany is very strict in who they sell their weapons too. Nations with human rights issues for the MOST part cant buy the tank and those who do have the tank, Germany decided to stop upgrading
If you are talking about the guys working on and in the Leopard 2A4's in the video, then those guys aren't German, they are Austrian. On most of the footage with the 2A6's (the ones with the Balkenkreuz on the turret sides) you see that they are often still aren't wearing helmets in the footage.
To quote one patriot: "German science is the best in the world!" EDIT: For fucks sake, I was referencing JoJo. There, that should prevent more people from taking this too seriously.
Especially German physics! The one without all that Einstein nonsense. The world, no the UNIVERSE (!!!) would be a much better place, if only the would comply with Gerrrman rrrrules! 🤣🤣🤣
@@bluntcabbage6042 It seems the point that was made here was that what they meant was 'research' not science, which, unlike research, is nothing but universal, non-personal, non-national fact ;)
@@damianm-nordhorn116 That's true, I'm just tired of people acting like Germany's magically superior to all other countries. While they have accomplished great things and have made some advanced technologies, we can't pretend that the UK or US aren't on par with them.
Ever wondered how the Leopard 2 kept getting heavier but the performance remained the same with the same engine? MTU notionally always says the engine is 1500 BHP, but a friend of mine who is in the Swiss army says that when they dyno tested their Leopards, it was a lot more powerful than 1500 BHP. German engineering indeed.
You have quite an amenable way to present rather arid information, and the fact that you are an actual vet tanker from a war zone makes it more enjoyable. Thanks Matt the tank.
You should have mentioned some of the Leopard 2's other features: - It can dive through about four meter deep water with additional diving equipment (which is basically just a foldable tower over the commander's hatch to provide the tank with air and a rubber plug for the canon) - It can climb vertical objects like concret walls or blockades with a hight of about one meter without additional help - It's complete engine can be changed with the help of an amored recovery tank in less than 30 minutes - even on the battlefield! (Fun fact: The german amored recovery tank 'Büffel' shares the same body with the Leopard 2 and can change it's own engine running on batteries during the change) - The diesel engine can run with lots of different types of fuel: As long as it's fuel consists of 60 % diesel, 40 % can be any other flameable liquid like ethanol, gasoline or even vegetable oils - it needs only half of the fuel on the same distance compared to the gasturbine of a M1A1 Abrams (and it can run with many different types of fuel) There's lots of useful features the Leopard 2 has over other modern MBTs! But in the end, I guess a key point on which MBT is better is still the skill of it's crew and they're opponend. I think it's quiet unlikely, a Leopard 2 will ever face against an american, british, french, chinese or even a russian modern MBT on the battlefield so they all have to be considered as 'quiet equal' with every tank has it's pros and cons depending on the situation. (Greetings from Germany and sorry for my english, I'm a little bit out of training since I left school)
One of the most exciting pieces of engineering! It was interesting to operate along them, especially when one German Leopard hit my IFV... Amazing that this is my highlight of my conscript tour in the Dutch army during 1989-1990 :-)
As a swiss tanker on the Panzer 87 Leopard 2 WE, our upgraded Leopard 2A4, it was really interesting to hear the history of our good old, 40 year old Leopard
As a 12 year old on a school trip I got to start a Leopard 2 since I was in the driver seat at the time they wanted to drive it out. I still remember the cramped but comfortable seat and the magnificent rumble of the V12 diesel as it sprang to life. I won't soon forget it, even though it was almost 25 years ago.
So hear me out... every time there is a vehicle you find to be particularly interesting or badass, you play the Halo Climax theme song with the drums and guitar 😂😂😂
It's amazing being a Polish tanker, I've been driver of many cold war Soviet tanks when in service, Challenger, Abrams, Leopard and now got a job after my grandfather being designated tank driver in Warsaw tank museum driving T-34s and IS-3 with few panzers mixed in
AlexSDU the ADF used a modified version of the Leopard 1A4, in the ADF. Can’t quite remember what we designated it as, but they were 1A4 models of the Leopard 1.
One thing that should allways be remembered concerning the Leopards (1 and 2): The German road system. That gives the Leopard 2 its insane 1500 hp engine - Tiger of WW2 was clearly underpowered with a thirsty petrol fuelled engine - that mistake should not be repeated (and it most certainly wasn't - there is no such thing as to much horsepower in German thinking). The German idea behind the vehicle was: A Warsaw Pact break through could not be prevented as such, but the heavy tanks could have so much speed, that they could be brought to the crime scene before the russians could sort out their logistics. Those tank units that were not engaging the enemy's offensive would instead simultaneously counterattack where the enemy was thinned out to provide a concentration of force at the break through point. Basically it was meant to concentrate the bulk of the enemy against the british with their exellent gunnery and unusually well protected Challenger 2, albeit with limited operational mobility. Thus in effect crushing the russians between the german hammer and the british anvil. Now, that changed after the cold war. First problem was that the old Warsaw Pact nations had become the new Nato countries. They had (and have to this day) a shitty infrastructure and a major roadbuilding programme is still in the making. The Baltic States are getting EU-funding to provide the road structure - mainly for civilian use. It has been quite entertaining to follow the political and administrative wrangling. Basically the Baltic States have been very much preoccupied with their internal priorities - and shortage of funding. The EU and their sir Humpfrey Appelby's have begged (on their knees) the politicians of the three nations just to reach an agreement to apply for the road - write on the back of an envelope, just get the signatures! The hammering out of the details: Leave that to the beurocracy in the EU - that is what they are there for - and they are very good at it. Furthermore: The funding IS THERE. Now in 2014 the invasion of the Ukraine happened, which made the gloves come off. The road building in the Baltics (and Poland) would not be finished in short order. The main problem for the heavy tanks is, that there are LOTS of rivers in Europe that are not navigable and the bridges over them are not strong enough to take tanks. The rail system is a hassle and an old fashioned BOTHER - so that will not be finished in time - no matter what date. Rail-systems timetables are like planning for the second coming of Christ. Christ will be reborn to us - eventually! But if you don't CROSS the rivers and use the plenthora of ports along the Baltic coast - then the situation is far from hopeless. Now sidestep into my bailliwick: Danish defence planning. The polish problem of containing the russians. Well drawing from experience. Germans and Poles form a division with the Danes. Something that was as credible as the immaculate conception of the Mary. But as far, as I can tell: It works! The poles indubitably hate the germans; but not quite as much as they hate the russians - and with a mediator to smooth out ruffled feathers and the germans hefty wallet - things work out. That did not solve the Baltic problem of transporting the heavy tanks. Well, here we are not contemplating using road or rail for the major part: We use ferries! We get the british to lead one brigade in Estonia, the canadians to head another in Lithuania. Then we get the Norwegeans and the Dutch to contribute a combat group of batallion size - we put up a batallion as well. Keep the pesky Russians from interfering in the Baltic Sea - their navy is rusted to the piers anyway. Point being: They are all armed with Leopard 2! Except the british - of course - they HAVE to be difficult.
Now I will move out from the scope of Matsimus UA-cam. Basically because we allway end up talking MONEY. I will try to explain, why there is money enough! Lots of it! And why Germany is able and willing to foot the bill! I admit it is a difficult matter; but bear with me. Now it does not take a rocket scientist to understand why roads and railroads further economic growth! Put simply: It provides cheap access to cheaper labour, which lowers production cost, increases competition which cuts into monopoly profits and lowers prices. Now every business cares shit about others - that is a fact of life. The consumer cares shit about others - that is also a fact of life. Now: A road opens up both a market and production - and lowers production cost, moving raw materials and parts to the cheapest producer. At the same time it puts money into the pockets of the workers and producers that make them able to purchase. If you think Latvians don't like to spend money? You are dead wrong! Now if you simultaneously increase consumption and production the economy grows! I.e. the GDP grows. If each country contributes the same fraction of money to infrastructural projects Germany ends up with the greatest bill - simply because it has the greatest GDP. Now that is not a gift, because infrastructural projects will increase the GDP of the countries recieving the new roads/railways - and they will pay because they will have to pay in proportion to their GDP! I hope I clarified a point or two about the EU and their defence! If You follow me this far - You show more comprehension than most above Your pay grade!
@@gioaxe4538 Vlad calls the shots in Russia, and is quite open about his wish to expand into the old Soviet sphere. The Balts and Poles are not really keen on that. Vlad is also undermining NATO, individual countries in Europe and not least the US, to further his ambition of expanding Russia and a return to the great power state. He also percieves liberal democracy as a threat that needs to be destroyed. That will be a no from me on all those counts. I too like Russians, the ones I know are warn, friendly and hospitable. However, as long as they choose to live with an oligarchy keeping up an autocrat, they are not really our friends.
Agreed almost with everything. Just not about the part that Poles hate Germans. I don't know where do you live but u are wrong on that point...It isn't time after WWII and many Poles rather working with German because they are straight forward not as Brits are. On the other hand- hate Russian as they kept us under long-time occupation- true to that.
@@wudruffwildcard252 yeah, it is a good product. It also tells something of the times in economic terms, when you cannot afford ot pay out of pocket right away.
Lease before buy - might say a lot about the product, but more about Swedes: they want to know what they get for their kroner. Common sense and respect for tax payers money!
peter müller Yeah, but the 2A6 is one of the most important upgrades because of the new gun. The 2A6M and 2A7 did a lot for crew protection, especially for mines.
@@eifelerplanespotter653 na, the A7 has the L/55 and the A7V has the L/55A1. The A7 was the planned upgrade but it was decided that it need some minor upgrades besides the whole A7 package. For example they gave the gunner now also a 3 gen infrared sight, all variants up to the A7 had still only the gen 1. But with the A7V they fixed it.
I was working in Germany near one of their main bases and these things were everywhere. Very impressive, more so in person. Video just doesn't do it justice.
Thank you Germany for god tanks From 🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪 Great video but Sweden doesn’t actually use the leopard 2A4 anymore they where rebuild to ingenjörbandvagn 120, scraped or they where sent back to Germany.
@Joshua N. Ajang Possibly. Maybe they just produced enough of their version of the 2A5 (with upgraded armor protection to the standard 2A5, as well as different electronics and grenade launchers on the turret), called Stridsvagn (?) 122. Anyway, if they wanted to and still have the facilities, the Swedes can produce more of that tank, as they, just as many other countries, got a full production license for it.
Hazardous I know, they'd have to redesign the turret and put it all the ammunition in the turret like the Abrams (yes I know the Abrams has a few hull stowage rounds with blow out panels). This is basically the deciding factor between the Abrams and leopard 2 debate for me. I'll always go with the Abrams because I'll feel a whole lot safer in it compared to the Leopard 2. Had the leopard got rid of the hull stowage I would go with it every time.
@@sargesacker2599 I think people are making too much of the hull ammo thing. The frontal hull is probably the safest place in the whole tank. It is less likely to get hit than the turret, because tanks usually fight hull down and it has strong armor protection. Nobody calls the Merkava a death trap because it too stores ammo in the hull. You could even argue that the Merkava's hull store is less safe, because it is at the back, where the tank has less side protection.
Also, I REALLY loved the idea behind the MBT/KPz-70 and I feel it's a shame they didn't go very far though obviously the Abrams and Leopard eventually became far superior to the MBT/KPz concept. That hydropneumatic (sp?) suspension was so ahead of its time and its mobility and firepower were unparalleled with that awesome 155mm gun/atgm launcher. Not to mention that lovely 20mm secondary!
Put simply, this was the winner tank design for world war III. Designed specifically not only to massacre the best MBTs of the Warsaw pact, but to massacre them when heavily outnumbered by them. If a single one had to fight with 5 or even 10 T-64s or T-72s it was surely expected to take some direct hits and survive. Leo's beauty is that it seems to absolutely nail the tank triangle. It had massive firepower with excellent fire control, it was armoured like a fortress, and still - had one of the fastest chassis in the tank world. It really looks like the age old tank triangle of compromise between firepower, mobility and protection did not apply for Leo.
Can't wait in 30 years when these tanks were eventually be replaced and then scrapped, I wanna own one if thats legal lol. Without the shells and bullets tho
I'm about 5' 6" (168 cm), however being also a Commando my shoulders and hips have become broad, so subsequently when I was working in RAEME EMESYS, I had the opportunity to visit the Tank Maintenance Unit in Bandiana, North Victoria, while they had the Leopards 1Bs and was very impressed until I had the opportunity to try the Commanders seat, which turned out to be a very tight fit, for a person who could climb to the Hanger roof, with just hands, and fast too, but they did look good and training the main gun was almost beyond impressive :-)
Could you please do a video comparing the major different types of NBC protection on armoured vehicles? I am sure they do not all use the same standards/techniques, but they all just get classed as NBC vs non NBC.
My fav Top 5 tanks Leo at first place follow by Abrams,3rd place go to K2 , M60 with latest package up , Challenger 2 . At least from more modern tanks.
Nope Leopard 2 has survive Kornet shots, the Leopard 2 in syria were not destroyed by hostile fire, it was destroyed by Turkish Airstrike to prevent them from being captured. Abrams has not survive a Kornet
When Indonesia got this, I was ecstatic! But then months later... I realize as to why we even bought this: its a big tank, for use in archipelago. Half were mostly in Java and maybe Kalimantan, or more likely stationed in Sumatera. Its like having a super car when you commute most of the time in Jakarta, impractical, just looks cool. But then I was relieved that we are developing the Kaplan with Turkey, fits better for our "mobile", small island defence military for convenience.
Politically that was never going to happen. Hell, the Bundeswehr barely got away with naming a Barracks after Field Marshal Rommel and basically had to make the case to the Bundestag that it was honoring his WW1, interwar sevice, and his loyalty to "the German people" due to his alleged involvement in the Hitler/Nazi party assassination plot/coup which ultimately caused his death.
naa, modern mbts have nothing in common with these old slow heavy tanks. tigers where breakthrough tanks, designed to punch a gap in the frontline, for the faster and waaaay cheaper pz3 tanks, and go back for maintenance and medals^^. and they where perfect in this role. but they where not designed to fight as mbt, over a longer time. thats why so many of them broke down. if you choose one of the german ww2 tanks, the panther 3 would be a better name.
If I recall we had a Leopard at Ft. Knox in about 1977 or 78. It was in one of the maintenance shops. The first XM-1 Abrams i ever saw in about 78 or 79 rolled out of the maintenance yard onto the road drove about a 100 yards and throw a track. Myself and another NCO in the scout unit beat feet before we got shanghaied by the crew to help put the track back on we saw that movie before.
@troll oracle No tank is invincible, and most tank battles don’t end up like Asal Uttar or 73 Easting. But Turkish forces lost Leopard 2A4s by dozens at a time against a ragtag ill-trained militia. That is different than losing 1 tank.
@troll oracle It's not the tanks fault anyways. Classic Arab crew disaster. Neither Leopard nor Armata can win a war with stupid crews. Things are different when they are commandeered by Russians or Poles.
Excellent synopsis of the various upgrades in the engineering, testing, and tweaking of what turned out to be a world class fighting vehicle, perhaps the best in its class. Faster, lighter than the American Abrams series with logistics such as petrol comsumption far more manageable. With oil in short supply, the Leopard has a distinct advantage over the gas-guzzling American counterpart.
@Matsimus The Revolution/Evolution armor package (now known as ADT) has been applied to Singaporean and Indonesian Leopard 2's. The package is slightly different between the two countries' tanks; neither carry the ROSY soft-kill aps, and the armor modules are of slightly different configurations.
Not if you know anything about radio you wouldn't. VHF is what you want for tactical and operational use. EHF is going to be less effective than VHF in your normal military situation.
I am a Civillian now , but once upon a time I was a Tpr with the Royal Australian Armoured Corps of the 4th/19th Prince of Wales' Light Horse " A & C Squadron's here in Victoria , Australia . I loved being a Crew Commander in the old Armoured Vehical's of the 60's & 70's when I first joined , they were simple little Vehical's , but effective for the roles in which they preformed they were as follow's = Ferret Scoutcar ( Light Armoured attack Vehical , Saracen ( 6 wheeled mostly RHQ when out in the field during action's against other force's ( Enemy ) Staghound with a sting from the Turret Gun as well as two 30cal Machine Guns one beside the main Gun , the other mounted so that the Crew Commander could use it , later on the introduced the Centurion Main Battle Tank of which was taken to Vietnam During their Conflict ( WAR ) this was superceeded by the German Leopard 1 , of which came to our shores with Computer control for the main guns , as well as a lot more speed than the Centurion ever had , my job although I was with the RAAC was as an ASSULT Trooper ( Rifleman ) ( GRUNT ) I loved doing the ground work for the Armour of our Brigade , as Tank's can't feel out IED's or Mine's that was our job as Ground Forces & we did it to pefection to protect all of our force's whether they be Cook's - Medical - or whatever !!
I remember a Bundeswehr-commercial where they put a glass of beer on the tip of the cannon to show how good the stabilizer works :) ua-cam.com/video/K2mcO6l-0cY/v-deo.html
Leopard: Hey Abrams, did you remember how Grampa Tiger and Grandpa Sherman used to fight till death? and now we are good friends. Abrams: Yes! I can't believe time has passed!. T-90: Blyat! I will make Grandpa T-34 Proud.
@@Schnittertm1 True, I always forget that they changed the turret in advance but still he didn't talk about that either... you would think a 2020 video on Leopard 2 would focus on A5 A6 A7+ updates rather than cold war models that pretty much don't even exist anymore at this point
@@Schnittertm1 Nope, but your tracks won´t like the aditional load! You can speed up a leo be removing the restrictors from the turbos. Funny, it didn´t decline engine live. 8 Years later on service: "If you mess with the engine, I break your neck!" There was still a Leo2 considerably faster than the rest in the 121 Bt. 😂
@@karstenklump5200 our Leo 2A4 already went much faster than the official number but we heard stuff from the older crews that there is some kind of thing near the engine controller box thing that you can play with if you want it to go even faster, we never managed to figure out what the thing was they ment because their service ended the same day we came to their company. Dunno if the same thing applies to the 2A6 it seems little sluggish compared to our 2A4. Sorry english is my second language 😂
Thumbs up to Google taking down your previous 🐆 video, so you had to sweeten my 'Tag der Arbeit'/'Labour day' with a new 🐆 video 🤣🤣 Thanks and cheers from 🇩🇪/🇪🇺
@@steelshower7949 You're asking this after watching a Leopard 2 video? 🤣🤣 🇩🇰🇫🇮🇬🇷🇳🇱(🇳🇴)🇦🇹🇵🇱🇵🇹(🇨🇭)🇸🇪🇪🇦🇭🇺 Because we're stronger together. The EU coincides with the most stable, peaceful and prosperous Europe ever. One reason we don't/can't fight each other anymore is our (economic) interdependence. Also I love and support my neighbors and in these times my heart goes out to EVERYBODY suffering from the impact of the Wuhan virus but especially to 🇲🇫🇪🇦🇮🇹 and our other our 🇪🇺friends, who are suffering so bad.
@@steelshower7949 I don't understand what you're saying. Literally. I'm German, I'm European, I love the 'Bundesrepublik Deutschland' and have great respect for the EU. Also Germany is in the EU, so next time I might write 🇩🇪@🇪🇺, would you approve of that?
Inteligentnym bardzo facetem jesteś a produkcja twa jest rewelacyjna i tak trzymaj ?! Inspirujące fakty przedstawiasz Panie szanowny . Nie podoba mi się fakt ,że dwa razy szukałem twego kanału na UA-cam . Wyglądało jak by UA-cam utrudnia dostęp do Twoich treści . Polska jest za Tobą . Bartosz Grabarek from Poland .
UA-cam: Deletes video about a German Tank.
Matsimus: Must be time for an updated video.
Im curious why the original video got taken down
@@matthewnunya8483 my guess he hit too near to what is classified or sensitive....
@Herbert Erdferkel Its all fair use. Its more likely someone else used said footage in one of there videos and filed a dispute
@Herbert Erdferkel Where do you get off with such a god complex? Or is it simply the keyboard warrior one we keep seeing? I was simply voicing an option. And if you read my entire comment you would see I mentioned others footage. That falls under "military and production companies". Clearly you are a tad slow.
@Herbert Erdferkel me big brain
Here goes Matsimus posting porn videos again, and he wonders why he gets demonitized.
but dont stop
It's tank pron
Waiting for the overly engineered King Leopard.
Aaron Seet I wish after WW2, NATO and the Soviets just kept making heavy tanks like the IS. Eventually we would’ve gotten a moon gun on a tank and I just feel like we missed out
build the Ratte pls
oh it's coming, just look at the more beefier 2A6-7 Leos with its additional modular ERA armor and AMAP-ADS/APS
overly engineered ???.....all tanks are overly engineered.....tank losses are permanent so they better be .
@@martijn31101969 this is not meant.what is meant is that handcrafted chains will do the same job industrial welded ones to hold on tools on the tank during a combat situation. the one just takes longer to assemble. and time is a important factor.
sometimes simple solutions do a better job.
everybody gangsta until germany pulls out the secretly developed maus 2
Secret tank development? Not so much.
Secret stealth fighter programs, otoh ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MBB_Lampyridae
www.aerosociety.com/news/lout-of-the-black/
Posi Troll wait a minute those are planes
Maus is a german heavy tank that was too heavy and was a crappy tabk
@@yukiakito3083 Um, and? He was talking of a Maus 2, not the original one, thus (jokingly I assume) implying Germany had a secret tank program after WWII or right now.
I pointed out that's not the case (LeoII AX and MGCS programs both arent really secret in that sense). But it DID have secret stealth fighter programs.
Then they pull out the laugh-track when the big plob gets stuck in the mud or collapses a bridge it's trying to cross.
@@positroll7870 h
Germans really do love their cats
The canine were used by the Nazi. Hitler liked his dogs. So Wehrmacht changed from canine to cats.
@@Berek71182 umm what lol? Are tigers 🐅, panthers 🐆 and pumas dogs?????
@@Berek71182 they used cats and the Germans continued using cats because they don’t give a fuck about stupid things like that, and that’s a good thing.
@@Berek71182 are you stupid?
Just like shane dawson
Thanks for the Video. Greetings from a german tank platoon comander served on 2A4 A5 and A6. For 12 years.
Panzer marsch!
how loud are they inside?
@@bassbusterx well hard to discribe. When THW engine is out but all systems aktivated its a light sound. Like ringing. When THW engine starts and you move hell breaks lose and you can only comunicate by the onboard com system. When your tank shoots its OK its much louder When the tank beside you shoots. Hard to discribe...
@@marcelwachter1764 It is strange. I also noticed. Even when you're standing next to the tank outside, a shot isn't very loud. But when you are a few meters away, it is a blow that you feel in your chest and go through your whole body.
i kinda hate and love u tin soldiers :)….u scared the shit out of my squad once when u guys came racin full throttel in the direction of our forward observation post from behind…..and past us.Tbh i had only 2 words in my mind....schei+++ and idi++. :)
" German engineering" oh that's a powerful phrase lol
Russian bias even more powerful
Indian nationalism is so powerful it makes the Arjun look like a good tank 😂
@@hansmeyer7225 made my day :D
🤣arjun is new abrams
@@bakaweiner6956 Arjun = Captain America stronk!
Former Cold War A1 Abrams tanker. Love my Abrams, but I do LUV the Leo 2s
Same here. Loved being on the Abrams while I was doing my stint as a tanker in 2/66 AR 2nd ADF. Because we were the only combat unit from the U.S. in NORTHAG our sister unit was a German unit and they had the Leo2. We got to do quite a bit of cross training with them and, if I had to go to war on anything but an Abrams it would definitely a Leo. Great tank.
@Joshua N. Ajang best guess I can give is they went with the 105mm as opposed to the German 120mm because, at the time, Germany had not yet got the semicombustable cases quite "right". Provisions were made in the M1 turret to mount the 120 at a later date. The US HAD a 120mm gun prior to the M1, it was mounted in the M103 heavy tank. I believe it was the same gun that the Brits mounted in the Conqueror, or it was very similar. Both used separate loading ammo. Brits had one loader, we had 2. The US MBT70 used the same gun as the M60A2 and the M551 Sheridan. The MBT70 project was, intriguing, but the technologies weren't mature enough at the time. Many features an ideas of the MBT70 did make it into the Abrams, and possibly even the Leo.
@@n5syr01 did u ever get the chance to crawl around a leo2? i can only imagine that a large part of international exercises is so u guys can check out each other's shit! i know loads of US troops in germany are desperate to get their german weapon schuetzen badge (given its one of the few foreign awards US soldiers are allowed to display on their uniform
Ahem, challie 2
@@innouniversedoineedthis challanger 2 didnt come out, way long after leopard 2 came into service in the Wehr at the time when the Leo 2s roll out the production line the MoD still bickering how they counter the Leo 2s. By that time the British still could learn and study the Leo 2s so they could make their future Challanger 2 tanks better than the Leo 2s, but eventually its mostly equal. British could defeat the Germans in wars but they couldn't defeat their engineers in designing armored vehicles and MBTs, deal with it.
Hands down the most beautiful tank series ever made
Agreed. The turret sloped armor is pleasing to look at
As a tank commander told me:
Anyone that can get Leopard will buy it, and the ones who can’t will buy the Abrams
What did he mean by that?
Erwin Rommel Abrams are great tanks. Abrams has a good combat record.
I find it doubtful, or this tank commander doesn't know what he is talking about.
Countries buy Leopards instead of Abrams because it's much better deal. You can get latest version of Leopard or inferior export version of Abrams and Leos are cheaper.
Ally Agreed, leopards are cheaper and are much more versatile. They have a lot of modular upgrades that can suit each countries demands.
@@Brix_H Germany is very strict in who they sell their weapons too. Nations with human rights issues for the MOST part cant buy the tank and those who do have the tank, Germany decided to stop upgrading
I didn't know that German tankers finally broke their old tradition of never wearing helmets.
@Joshua N. Ajang Possible, but maybe it has something to do with the Bundeswehr having had 2 female Defense Ministers now, hehehe.
If you are talking about the guys working on and in the Leopard 2A4's in the video, then those guys aren't German, they are Austrian. On most of the footage with the 2A6's (the ones with the Balkenkreuz on the turret sides) you see that they are often still aren't wearing helmets in the footage.
No helmet. They only protect vital organs.
No worry we didn't broke the tradition ;) we still wear our beret on regular exercises
Health & *##*¥ Safety....surprised they ain't all in Hi-Vis vests lol
To quote one patriot: "German science is the best in the world!"
EDIT: For fucks sake, I was referencing JoJo. There, that should prevent more people from taking this too seriously.
Sekai Ichi!
Especially German physics!
The one without all that Einstein nonsense.
The world, no the UNIVERSE (!!!) would be a much better place, if only the would comply with Gerrrman rrrrules! 🤣🤣🤣
It isn't, but okay.
@@bluntcabbage6042
It seems the point that was made here was that what they meant was 'research' not science, which, unlike research, is nothing but universal, non-personal, non-national fact ;)
@@damianm-nordhorn116 That's true, I'm just tired of people acting like Germany's magically superior to all other countries. While they have accomplished great things and have made some advanced technologies, we can't pretend that the UK or US aren't on par with them.
Ever wondered how the Leopard 2 kept getting heavier but the performance remained the same with the same engine? MTU notionally always says the engine is 1500 BHP, but a friend of mine who is in the Swiss army says that when they dyno tested their Leopards, it was a lot more powerful than 1500 BHP. German engineering indeed.
You could actually get shit ton more power from the engine but its not worth it
@@taistelusammakko5088 Yeah, for sure. But they've got to think about reliability and durability too. Maybe even fuel consumption.
You have quite an amenable way to present rather arid information, and the fact that you are an actual vet tanker from a war zone makes it more enjoyable. Thanks Matt the tank.
I love how the Germans decided not to focus on mobility, but still made one of the fastest tanks out there.
Just Germans doing German things lol
Germany was focusing on mobility when designing the Leopard. Mobility -> Gun -> Armor.
Why, didn't you know? Germans get +10 on diesel engine construction upon character creation.
@@JazzJaRa To quote Guderian, the engine of a tank is as much a weapon as its gun.
@@Chrischi3TutorialLPs But Guderian's larger Tanks had weak engines, Terrible Transmissions and final drives.
7:28 this is what's known as the "OH CRAP, THE OST FRONT IS COLLAPSING!!!" maneuver.
ja haha
XD
Shoot
And
Scoot
You should have mentioned some of the Leopard 2's other features:
- It can dive through about four meter deep water with additional diving equipment (which is basically just a foldable tower over the commander's hatch to provide the tank with air and a rubber plug for the canon)
- It can climb vertical objects like concret walls or blockades with a hight of about one meter without additional help
- It's complete engine can be changed with the help of an amored recovery tank in less than 30 minutes - even on the battlefield! (Fun fact: The german amored recovery tank 'Büffel' shares the same body with the Leopard 2 and can change it's own engine running on batteries during the change)
- The diesel engine can run with lots of different types of fuel: As long as it's fuel consists of 60 % diesel, 40 % can be any other flameable liquid like ethanol, gasoline or even vegetable oils
- it needs only half of the fuel on the same distance compared to the gasturbine of a M1A1 Abrams (and it can run with many different types of fuel)
There's lots of useful features the Leopard 2 has over other modern MBTs! But in the end, I guess a key point on which MBT is better is still the skill of it's crew and they're opponend.
I think it's quiet unlikely, a Leopard 2 will ever face against an american, british, french, chinese or even a russian modern MBT on the battlefield so they all have to be considered as 'quiet equal' with every tank has it's pros and cons depending on the situation.
(Greetings from Germany and sorry for my english, I'm a little bit out of training since I left school)
Scheiße man dein Englisch ist nicht übel ! In meiner Schule hatten wir echt nur wenig Englisch das meiste durch Serien gelernt :D
Very good video
Hei artur!
It's u
Aisaatana. Estonian bröder. Hello from Finland. Teretulemast tänne!
One of the most exciting pieces of engineering! It was interesting to operate along them, especially when one German Leopard hit my IFV... Amazing that this is my highlight of my conscript tour in the Dutch army during 1989-1990 :-)
The leopard has seen service from Chile to Canada to Indonesia this shows how versatile this tank is and why it will be with us for decades to come
As a swiss tanker on the Panzer 87 Leopard 2 WE, our upgraded Leopard 2A4, it was really interesting to hear the history of our good old, 40 year old Leopard
As a 12 year old on a school trip I got to start a Leopard 2 since I was in the driver seat at the time they wanted to drive it out. I still remember the cramped but comfortable seat and the magnificent rumble of the V12 diesel as it sprang to life. I won't soon forget it, even though it was almost 25 years ago.
Damn you’re old now
So hear me out... every time there is a vehicle you find to be particularly interesting or badass, you play the Halo Climax theme song with the drums and guitar 😂😂😂
With that drums i get battlestar glactica vibes 😅
I was hoping for a new Leo2 video so much but I didn’t thought you would make one 🥰
Learned that my Mazda 3 couldn't stand a Leopard 2 driving over it 9:44
What a surprise I guess XD
Ah finally, the big cat is here! Loving the vids Matt keep it up
Jeje
It's amazing being a Polish tanker, I've been driver of many cold war Soviet tanks when in service, Challenger, Abrams, Leopard and now got a job after my grandfather being designated tank driver in Warsaw tank museum driving T-34s and IS-3 with few panzers mixed in
Did you also kill innocent Muslims- God's chosen people - In Iraq and Afghanistan. Doomed if u did.
The German Panther and Leopard 2 are my favorite tanks out there. Thank you for the updated video
Loll same
Cool, a video on one of my favorite MBTs! I've built around 6 variants of this, from the Leopard 1 to the 2A6. Thanks for the video, Matt!
My old man drove the old L1A4 for the ADF, loved tanks my whole life. Leopard 2 is my favourite though, so thank you.
What is that? All I found in Google is SLR's bayonet.
AlexSDU the ADF used a modified version of the Leopard 1A4, in the ADF. Can’t quite remember what we designated it as, but they were 1A4 models of the Leopard 1.
@@jaegergames7042 I see. That would be the Leopard AS1.
One thing that should allways be remembered concerning the Leopards (1 and 2): The German road system. That gives the Leopard 2 its insane 1500 hp engine - Tiger of WW2 was clearly underpowered with a thirsty petrol fuelled engine - that mistake should not be repeated (and it most certainly wasn't - there is no such thing as to much horsepower in German thinking).
The German idea behind the vehicle was: A Warsaw Pact break through could not be prevented as such, but the heavy tanks could have so much speed, that they could be brought to the crime scene before the russians could sort out their logistics.
Those tank units that were not engaging the enemy's offensive would instead simultaneously counterattack where the enemy was thinned out to provide a concentration of force at the break through point.
Basically it was meant to concentrate the bulk of the enemy against the british with their exellent gunnery and unusually well protected Challenger 2, albeit with limited operational mobility.
Thus in effect crushing the russians between the german hammer and the british anvil.
Now, that changed after the cold war. First problem was that the old Warsaw Pact nations had become the new Nato countries. They had (and have to this day) a shitty infrastructure and a major roadbuilding programme is still in the making. The Baltic States are getting EU-funding to provide the road structure - mainly for civilian use. It has been quite entertaining to follow the political and administrative wrangling.
Basically the Baltic States have been very much preoccupied with their internal priorities - and shortage of funding. The EU and their sir Humpfrey Appelby's have begged (on their knees) the politicians of the three nations just to reach an agreement to apply for the road - write on the back of an envelope, just get the signatures! The hammering out of the details: Leave that to the beurocracy in the EU - that is what they are there for - and they are very good at it. Furthermore: The funding IS THERE.
Now in 2014 the invasion of the Ukraine happened, which made the gloves come off.
The road building in the Baltics (and Poland) would not be finished in short order.
The main problem for the heavy tanks is, that there are LOTS of rivers in Europe that are not navigable and the bridges over them are not strong enough to take tanks. The rail system is a hassle and an old fashioned BOTHER - so that will not be finished in time - no matter what date. Rail-systems timetables are like planning for the second coming of Christ. Christ will be reborn to us - eventually!
But if you don't CROSS the rivers and use the plenthora of ports along the Baltic coast - then the situation is far from hopeless. Now sidestep into my bailliwick: Danish defence planning.
The polish problem of containing the russians. Well drawing from experience. Germans and Poles form a division with the Danes. Something that was as credible as the immaculate conception of the Mary. But as far, as I can tell: It works! The poles indubitably hate the germans; but not quite as much as they hate the russians - and with a mediator to smooth out ruffled feathers and the germans hefty wallet - things work out.
That did not solve the Baltic problem of transporting the heavy tanks. Well, here we are not contemplating using road or rail for the major part: We use ferries! We get the british to lead one brigade in Estonia, the canadians to head another in Lithuania. Then we get the Norwegeans and the Dutch to contribute a combat group of batallion size - we put up a batallion as well. Keep the pesky Russians from interfering in the Baltic Sea - their navy is rusted to the piers anyway.
Point being: They are all armed with Leopard 2! Except the british - of course - they HAVE to be difficult.
Now I will move out from the scope of Matsimus UA-cam. Basically because we allway end up talking MONEY. I will try to explain, why there is money enough! Lots of it! And why Germany is able and willing to foot the bill!
I admit it is a difficult matter; but bear with me.
Now it does not take a rocket scientist to understand why roads and railroads further economic growth! Put simply: It provides cheap access to cheaper labour, which lowers production cost, increases competition which cuts into monopoly profits and lowers prices.
Now every business cares shit about others - that is a fact of life. The consumer cares shit about others - that is also a fact of life.
Now: A road opens up both a market and production - and lowers production cost, moving raw materials and parts to the cheapest producer. At the same time it puts money into the pockets of the workers and producers that make them able to purchase. If you think Latvians don't like to spend money? You are dead wrong!
Now if you simultaneously increase consumption and production the economy grows! I.e. the GDP grows. If each country contributes the same fraction of money to infrastructural projects Germany ends up with the greatest bill - simply because it has the greatest GDP. Now that is not a gift, because infrastructural projects will increase the GDP of the countries recieving the new roads/railways - and they will pay because they will have to pay in proportion to their GDP!
I hope I clarified a point or two about the EU and their defence! If You follow me this far - You show more comprehension than most above Your pay grade!
So... war with russia for european peace.
To the point i not hate russia but hate putin
@@gioaxe4538 Vlad calls the shots in Russia, and is quite open about his wish to expand into the old Soviet sphere. The Balts and Poles are not really keen on that. Vlad is also undermining NATO, individual countries in Europe and not least the US, to further his ambition of expanding Russia and a return to the great power state. He also percieves liberal democracy as a threat that needs to be destroyed.
That will be a no from me on all those counts. I too like Russians, the ones I know are warn, friendly and hospitable. However, as long as they choose to live with an oligarchy keeping up an autocrat, they are not really our friends.
Agreed almost with everything. Just not about the part that Poles hate Germans. I don't know where do you live but u are wrong on that point...It isn't time after WWII and many Poles rather working with German because they are straight forward not as Brits are. On the other hand- hate Russian as they kept us under long-time occupation- true to that.
@@LiberNull777 some Poles do. Ontology has hit Poland just like the rest of the world, and there is widespread hard nationalism there.
Interesting fact from my Sweden: when my country got the Leopard 2, it was as lease to buy. Yes. We leased the tanks at first.
Leasing something first and later buying it, says a lot about the product!
@@wudruffwildcard252 yeah, it is a good product. It also tells something of the times in economic terms, when you cannot afford ot pay out of pocket right away.
Lease before buy - might say a lot about the product, but more about Swedes: they want to know what they get for their kroner. Common sense and respect for tax payers money!
Just imagine leasing a Tank and then invading my country with the leased tanks XD
@@wudruffwildcard252 believe it or not you can't understand international arms supply by going to your local furniture store.
Love seeing the Leopards at the Ontario Regiment Museum. The sounds of those German engines, beautiful.
7:28 this is what's known as the "OH CRAP, HIND!!!" maneuver.
Hinds are no threat since Leopards are escorted by Gepards. You could say a KA-52 would get rid of the Gepards with SEAD but thats another topic^^
@@madrooky1398 I thought we phased it out^^
Gunner, HEAT, Chopper!!!!!
The Leopard 2 can engage helicopters with the MPAT and PELE rounds. It has a special anti-aircraft mode in the Fire Control System.
Anti Lope I’d pay to see that honestly
Why did you just skip over the 2A6 and 2A7? :(
He mentioned the A6 very briefly, but completely left out the A7, same with the Leopard 2 PSO, even though it's camo is the sexiest of the bunch.
peter müller Yeah, but the 2A6 is one of the most important upgrades because of the new gun. The 2A6M and 2A7 did a lot for crew protection, especially for mines.
@@tkkonigstiger3868 the 2a7v has also much more armor and a new l55a1 gun
@@eifelerplanespotter653 na, the A7 has the L/55 and the A7V has the L/55A1. The A7 was the planned upgrade but it was decided that it need some minor upgrades besides the whole A7 package. For example they gave the gunner now also a 3 gen infrared sight, all variants up to the A7 had still only the gen 1. But with the A7V they fixed it.
Things getting heated in the animal fandom
Now, I am a leopard 2A7 commander and I can confirm that it is great
I was working in Germany near one of their main bases and these things were everywhere. Very impressive, more so in person. Video just doesn't do it justice.
I was fortunate to get to go out for a run in a CDN 2A6 a couple years ago thru the driver training course . What a beast !!
Thanks for the vid I’m trying to learn as much as I can about this German beauty
Absolutely amazing and beautiful tank!
Thank you Germany for god tanks
From 🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪
Great video but Sweden doesn’t actually use the leopard 2A4 anymore they where rebuild to ingenjörbandvagn 120, scraped or they where sent back to Germany.
@Joshua N. Ajang Possibly. Maybe they just produced enough of their version of the 2A5 (with upgraded armor protection to the standard 2A5, as well as different electronics and grenade launchers on the turret), called Stridsvagn (?) 122. Anyway, if they wanted to and still have the facilities, the Swedes can produce more of that tank, as they, just as many other countries, got a full production license for it.
They should stay with the Leopard 2 as the name why change it to Strv?
The 2A5 upwards still spots the strongest frontal armor fielded on any tank today
It'll be even better had they removed the frontal ammo stowage in the unlikely event of a penetration the tank wouldn't go up.
Sarge Sacker25 The Leopard won’t have enough rounds if you got rid of the rounds in the hull
Hazardous
I know, they'd have to redesign the turret and put it all the ammunition in the turret like the Abrams (yes I know the Abrams has a few hull stowage rounds with blow out panels). This is basically the deciding factor between the Abrams and leopard 2 debate for me.
I'll always go with the Abrams because I'll feel a whole lot safer in it compared to the Leopard 2. Had the leopard got rid of the hull stowage I would go with it every time.
@@sargesacker2599 I think people are making too much of the hull ammo thing. The frontal hull is probably the safest place in the whole tank. It is less likely to get hit than the turret, because tanks usually fight hull down and it has strong armor protection.
Nobody calls the Merkava a death trap because it too stores ammo in the hull.
You could even argue that the Merkava's hull store is less safe, because it is at the back, where the tank has less side protection.
Any source on that ? I am geniunly curious.Especially how it compares to say a T90M, or the latest Abrams version.
That Tank deserved a second Video.
So much informations o.0
My top 5 tanks
Leopard 2
M1A2 Abrams
Challenger 2
T-90
T-14
Now we wait for the angry comments....
NATO tanks are just so sexy
Lynske Phu ikr Absolute Steel Juggernauts
A fighter jet can destroy all of them .
noice
My top 5 tanks
M60
M48
Leopard 1 (1st production)
Leopard 2
Merkava 1
afterall these years, Leo 2 still my number 2 the most beautiful tank ever
Panther is number 1
Panther G of course.
Also, I REALLY loved the idea behind the MBT/KPz-70 and I feel it's a shame they didn't go very far though obviously the Abrams and Leopard eventually became far superior to the MBT/KPz concept. That hydropneumatic (sp?) suspension was so ahead of its time and its mobility and firepower were unparalleled with that awesome 155mm gun/atgm launcher. Not to mention that lovely 20mm secondary!
Well, that sucks, but it's refreshing to watch updated content from the old ones so keep 'em dropping 😀
Put simply, this was the winner tank design for world war III. Designed specifically not only to massacre the best MBTs of the Warsaw pact, but to massacre them when heavily outnumbered by them. If a single one had to fight with 5 or even 10 T-64s or T-72s it was surely expected to take some direct hits and survive. Leo's beauty is that it seems to absolutely nail the tank triangle. It had massive firepower with excellent fire control, it was armoured like a fortress, and still - had one of the fastest chassis in the tank world. It really looks like the age old tank triangle of compromise between firepower, mobility and protection did not apply for Leo.
2:00 Austrian Panzergrenadiere at work.
I served as a Gunner in the Leopard 2A4. Every Shot on the Range was 20Kg of Pure Fun !
YT: HA! Now you'll have to make ANOTHER video about TANKS!
Matsimus: ...Oh no~
Air Superiority is always a big factor in tank warfare. If you're being attacked with guided missiles, you need to counter that actively.
I love the leopard so much and I cant wait until I'm old enough to crew one.
hehe, same ;)
Can't wait in 30 years when these tanks were eventually be replaced and then scrapped, I wanna own one if thats legal lol. Without the shells and bullets tho
I love these machines, verry proud that i can work with them 💪
The body reminds me of a Cromwell whilst the turret looks like a tigers turret
I hate war, but it makes me happy to see a modern tank with an iron cross on it. Germany, you are the Pahana. Never forget that. The Hopi know.
W-why did I just start hearing the Panzerleid in the background? Wait, what's going on in the Argonne region? HUH?! AGAIN?!
Panzerlied
Ardenne
The only thing missing is a german tank commander sticking out of the top looking like a badass wearing a cap and not a helmet.
RIP Mat's SA20
Enjoyed to a great extend, thank you!
"NICE TANK" is the only thing that I can say.
It's not about how effective it is
It's about how cool it looks
Could you talk about Super Tucano and the concept of light attack aircraft?
Didn't he already?
he already did a video on that..
I'm about 5' 6" (168 cm), however being also a Commando my shoulders and hips have become broad, so subsequently when I was working in RAEME EMESYS, I had the opportunity to visit the Tank Maintenance Unit in Bandiana, North Victoria, while they had the Leopards 1Bs and was very impressed until I had the opportunity to try the Commanders seat, which turned out to be a very tight fit, for a person who could climb to the Hanger roof, with just hands, and fast too, but they did look good and training the main gun was almost beyond impressive :-)
Could you please do a video comparing the major different types of NBC protection on armoured vehicles? I am sure they do not all use the same standards/techniques, but they all just get classed as NBC vs non NBC.
Got my call a few days ago to start BMQ on April 22!! Can't wait to get into the Dragoons and hopefully get assigned to the Leopard 2.
The Swedish leopard 2A5 has an improved armour package
I don't know if it's the best but to me, it's certainly the best looking and most intimidating.
Also Finland with the A6 =)
My fav Top 5 tanks Leo at first place follow by Abrams,3rd place go to K2 , M60 with latest package up , Challenger 2 . At least from more modern tanks.
Germany 2035 : Lion 1A0
Or even better: Tiger 3A0
Camel 1.
So you didnt hear about the French-German Projekt for a new Tank?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Ground_Combat_System
@@FlexDB Yes, I did. Let's hope it holds up better than their cooperation in the Eurofighter program.
@@arthipex8512 or the Eurocopter Tiger... :-(
I really like that you don't distort the pronunciation of German words too much as is often the case in English videos.
Ah yes, the wonderful history of German panzers, from reverse engineer, to over engineer to perfection
Extremely detailed research... thanks and sehr gut gemacht Soldat!!!
It only took 3 years to finally make this
I enlisted to the Norwegian army for the tank battalion hopefully I get to drive one of these in 2022
9:55 "It's safe to say the Leopard stuck by it's name as being one of the fastest tanks of it's time." Perhaps confusing the Leopard with a Cheetah?
Nope Leopard 2 has survive Kornet shots, the Leopard 2 in syria were not destroyed by hostile fire, it was destroyed by Turkish Airstrike to prevent them from being captured. Abrams has not survive a Kornet
When Indonesia got this, I was ecstatic! But then months later... I realize as to why we even bought this: its a big tank, for use in archipelago. Half were mostly in Java and maybe Kalimantan, or more likely stationed in Sumatera. Its like having a super car when you commute most of the time in Jakarta, impractical, just looks cool.
But then I was relieved that we are developing the Kaplan with Turkey, fits better for our "mobile", small island defence military for convenience.
That panzer should have been named the *Tiger 3.*
why not panther 3?
@@dillerhiller *russian screeching noises in the distance*
Politically that was never going to happen. Hell, the Bundeswehr barely got away with naming a Barracks after Field Marshal Rommel and basically had to make the case to the Bundestag that it was honoring his WW1, interwar sevice, and his loyalty to "the German people" due to his alleged involvement in the Hitler/Nazi party assassination plot/coup which ultimately caused his death.
naa, modern mbts have nothing in common with these old slow heavy tanks.
tigers where breakthrough tanks, designed to punch a gap in the frontline, for the faster and waaaay cheaper pz3 tanks, and go back for maintenance and medals^^.
and they where perfect in this role.
but they where not designed to fight as mbt, over a longer time. thats why so many of them broke down.
if you choose one of the german ww2 tanks, the panther 3 would be a better name.
@@mandalorian_guy and not flamable enough
If I recall we had a Leopard at Ft. Knox in about 1977 or 78. It was in one of the maintenance shops. The first XM-1 Abrams i ever saw in about 78 or 79 rolled out of the maintenance yard onto the road drove about a 100 yards and throw a track. Myself and another NCO in the scout unit beat feet before we got shanghaied by the crew to help put the track back on we saw that movie before.
I was on Ft Know in 1977 but left in April of that year. We saw XM1 on the way to Ft Hood while I was on Ft Polk.
"Turkish delight"- Syrian rebels wielding Kornets
Percentage of proper tank tactics applied by Turkish forces: 5
They even used those MBTs as artillery..
Dragonstorm Dipro yeah they where death traps in the Turkish intervention in Syria
Dragonstorm Dipro There is no MBT that can survive an incompetent crew and an atgm in the flank
@troll oracle No tank is invincible, and most tank battles don’t end up like Asal Uttar or 73 Easting. But Turkish forces lost Leopard 2A4s by dozens at a time against a ragtag ill-trained militia. That is different than losing 1 tank.
@troll oracle It's not the tanks fault anyways. Classic Arab crew disaster. Neither Leopard nor Armata can win a war with stupid crews. Things are different when they are commandeered by Russians or Poles.
Excellent synopsis of the various upgrades in the engineering, testing, and tweaking of what turned out to be a world class fighting vehicle, perhaps the best in its class. Faster, lighter than the American Abrams series with logistics such as petrol comsumption far more manageable. With oil in short supply, the Leopard has a distinct advantage over the gas-guzzling American counterpart.
please do a video on the alpha jet
@Matsimus The Revolution/Evolution armor package (now known as ADT) has been applied to Singaporean and Indonesian Leopard 2's. The package is slightly different between the two countries' tanks; neither carry the ROSY soft-kill aps, and the armor modules are of slightly different configurations.
Leopards with vhf radios, my 20 bicks Chinese baofeng has vhf you'd expect some ehf for military use
Not if you know anything about radio you wouldn't. VHF is what you want for tactical and operational use. EHF is going to be less effective than VHF in your normal military situation.
I am a Civillian now , but once upon a time I was a Tpr with the Royal Australian Armoured Corps of the 4th/19th Prince of Wales' Light Horse " A & C Squadron's here in Victoria , Australia .
I loved being a Crew Commander in the old Armoured Vehical's of the 60's & 70's when I first joined , they were simple little Vehical's , but effective for the roles in which they preformed they were as follow's = Ferret Scoutcar ( Light Armoured attack Vehical , Saracen ( 6 wheeled mostly RHQ when out in the field during action's against other force's ( Enemy ) Staghound with a sting from the Turret Gun as well as two 30cal Machine Guns one beside the main Gun , the other mounted so that the Crew Commander could use it , later on the introduced the Centurion Main Battle Tank of which was taken to Vietnam During their Conflict ( WAR ) this was superceeded by the German Leopard 1 , of which came to our shores with Computer control for the main guns , as well as a lot more speed than the Centurion ever had , my job although I was with the RAAC was as an ASSULT Trooper ( Rifleman ) ( GRUNT ) I loved doing the ground work for the Armour of our Brigade , as Tank's can't feel out IED's or Mine's that was our job as Ground Forces & we did it to pefection to protect all of our force's whether they be Cook's - Medical - or whatever !!
I remember a Bundeswehr-commercial where they put a glass of beer on the tip of the cannon to show how good the stabilizer works :)
ua-cam.com/video/K2mcO6l-0cY/v-deo.html
Outstanding MBT. Amazing vídeo. Greetings from Brasil!!!
Leopard: Hey Abrams, did you remember how Grampa Tiger and Grandpa Sherman used to fight till death? and now we are good friends.
Abrams: Yes! I can't believe time has passed!.
T-90: Blyat! I will make Grandpa T-34 Proud.
Fan Germany here :D. from Malaysia
Might have been worth mentioning that A6 introduced you know... a new gun and turret
Only the gun and associated systems (e.g. fire control) were changed, the turret remained the same as the 2A5.
@@Schnittertm1 True, I always forget that they changed the turret in advance but still he didn't talk about that either... you would think a 2020 video on Leopard 2 would focus on A5 A6 A7+ updates rather than cold war models that pretty much don't even exist anymore at this point
I *LOVE* that Ryse Son of Rome intro!
Leo 2 goes much faster unofficially 😂 greetings from Leo guy
Sure, you just need to replace the entire suspension after you do that.
@@Schnittertm1 whats wrong with the suspension 😂 we havent had any problems with it
@@Schnittertm1 Nope, but your tracks won´t like the aditional load! You can speed up a leo be removing the restrictors from the turbos. Funny, it didn´t decline engine live. 8 Years later on service: "If you mess with the engine, I break your neck!" There was still a Leo2 considerably faster than the rest in the 121 Bt. 😂
@@karstenklump5200 our Leo 2A4 already went much faster than the official number but we heard stuff from the older crews that there is some kind of thing near the engine controller box thing that you can play with if you want it to go even faster, we never managed to figure out what the thing was they ment because their service ended the same day we came to their company. Dunno if the same thing applies to the 2A6 it seems little sluggish compared to our 2A4. Sorry english is my second language 😂
Too nice video about leopard 2 ,leopard 2 AV with clearly explaining thanks 👍
IMO th german armor and technology have always been benchmark!!!
Developing the Puma IFV was a priority. It’s time to start long term plans for Leopard replacement..
These plans are already started
LeopardCentury It will be a decarbonised carbon neutral leopard 3 with facilities for pregnant women and infinity refugees.
@@WilliamJones-Halibut-vq1fs 🤣nah germany and france will develope one together :)
Thumbs up to Google taking down your previous 🐆 video, so you had to sweeten my 'Tag der Arbeit'/'Labour day' with a new 🐆 video 🤣🤣
Thanks and cheers from 🇩🇪/🇪🇺
Damian M-Nordhorn why do you use the eu-flag 🤨
@@steelshower7949
You're asking this after watching a Leopard 2 video? 🤣🤣
🇩🇰🇫🇮🇬🇷🇳🇱(🇳🇴)🇦🇹🇵🇱🇵🇹(🇨🇭)🇸🇪🇪🇦🇭🇺
Because we're stronger together.
The EU coincides with the most stable, peaceful and prosperous Europe ever.
One reason we don't/can't fight each other anymore is our (economic) interdependence.
Also I love and support my neighbors and in these times my heart goes out to EVERYBODY suffering from the impact of the Wuhan virus but especially to 🇲🇫🇪🇦🇮🇹 and our other our 🇪🇺friends, who are suffering so bad.
Damian M-Nordhorn huh the fuck is al that long as bs. you wrote “from 🇩🇪/🇪🇺” and was wondering why the eu flag was there when you wrote from.
@@steelshower7949
I don't understand what you're saying. Literally.
I'm German, I'm European, I love the 'Bundesrepublik Deutschland' and have great respect for the EU.
Also Germany is in the EU, so next time I might write 🇩🇪@🇪🇺, would you approve of that?
Damian M-Nordhorn yeah but 🇪🇺 is union flag not the flag of Europe
That is the most beautiful tank in the world!
The best there is.
Say it to turkish army...ahhh
Inteligentnym bardzo facetem jesteś a produkcja twa jest rewelacyjna i tak trzymaj ?! Inspirujące fakty przedstawiasz Panie szanowny . Nie podoba mi się fakt ,że dwa razy szukałem twego kanału na UA-cam . Wyglądało jak by UA-cam utrudnia dostęp do Twoich treści . Polska jest za Tobą . Bartosz Grabarek from Poland .