How to Analyze the Exclusionary Rule & Fruit of the Poisonous Tree on a Criminal Procedure Essay

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 січ 2019
  • 📚 LAW SCHOOL & BAR EXAM PREP
    Law school prep: studicata.com/law-school
    Bar exam prep: studicata.com/bar-exam
    Free courses: studicata.com/free-courses
    ❤️ COMMUNITY & REVIEWS
    Community: studicata.com/groups/community
    Testimonials: studicata.com/testimonials-an...
    Submit a review: shoutout.studicata.com
    📱 TECH
    iOS app: studicata.com/ios
    Android app: studicata.com/android
    📣 ABOUT
    Studicata provides a fresher, more relatable way to prep for law school finals and the bar exam. With top-rated video lectures, exam walkthrough videos, outlines, study guides, strategy guides, essay practice exams, multiple-choice assessments, performance tracking, and more-Studicata has you covered with everything you need to ace your finals and pass the bar exam with confidence.
    Email: info@studicata.com
    Learn more: studicata.com
    🎬 VIDEO INFO
    How to Analyze the Exclusionary Rule & Fruit of the Poisonous Tree on a Criminal Procedure Essay
    Learn more: studicata.com

КОМЕНТАРІ • 64

  • @Heymanitsme1
    @Heymanitsme1 7 місяців тому +4

    This man should teach every law class at every law school in the nation

  • @lydiakarnick1170
    @lydiakarnick1170 5 років тому +26

    This Criminal Procedure playlist helped me immensely with reviewing for my exam today. I felt so confident going in and think I did well. The videos were so good thank you so much

    • @studicata
      @studicata  5 років тому +3

      No problem, happy to help!

    • @princessruth9155
      @princessruth9155 Рік тому +1

      its been 3 years....tell me r u practicing?! u must be. so cool im studying rt now for the exam n my head is swimming lol.

    • @lydiakarnick1170
      @lydiakarnick1170 Рік тому +2

      @@princessruth9155 I am now practicing! Good luck! You'll do great and you'll pass!

  • @lari4319
    @lari4319 3 роки тому +3

    1:48 fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine, 5:22 exclusionary vs fruit

  • @reycfd7753
    @reycfd7753 9 місяців тому

    Amazing explanations! I am a Filipino from the Philippines studying Law, but I learn a lot watching your videos since our Laws are similar and related to your US Laws. Thanks and God bless!

  • @TheShadowHawkz
    @TheShadowHawkz 3 роки тому +5

    Such a clear explanation of these concepts, thank you!

  • @sarastrachan9847
    @sarastrachan9847 3 роки тому +2

    Very informative and helpful video, thank you so much!

  • @fidelinoallenpauls.3556
    @fidelinoallenpauls.3556 3 роки тому +4

    That was very informative.. Very impressive explanation. Thanks.
    Keep it up.👍

  • @lucasvaz9688
    @lucasvaz9688 4 роки тому +3

    thx from Brazil, I'm at the last year of law, and that's gonna be my graduation work theme.

  • @mayraacevedo4277
    @mayraacevedo4277 5 років тому +1

    Very Helpful! Thank you!

  • @lacefredell1515
    @lacefredell1515 3 роки тому +1

    This video definitely helped with my assignment for Criminal Procedure, thank you! Also, you posted this on my birthday! Lol.

  • @elijahporter4558
    @elijahporter4558 5 років тому +8

    Great videos ! To the point and direct !!

  • @creativepathwaysduringunce4832
    @creativepathwaysduringunce4832 3 роки тому

    Thank you. This was really great.

  • @ginanjobarahesq.5942
    @ginanjobarahesq.5942 5 років тому +3

    Great explanations! Thank you

    • @studicata
      @studicata  5 років тому +2

      Thank you for the support!

  • @ChadWardenPS3
    @ChadWardenPS3 5 років тому +22

    How did you this in a single take? That's impressive btw very helpful!

    • @melvinfong93
      @melvinfong93 5 років тому +1

      Add a public reply

    • @bryonwatkins1432
      @bryonwatkins1432 3 роки тому

      It’s easy. Once you are a continuous study, you’ll put things together with ease. The best thing about this video is him mentioning attenuation which no one mentions.
      Wish he spoke on the ‘silver platter’ doctrine. Cops 👮‍♀️ 👮‍♀️ think they can get away with that when they can’t!!!!

  • @SuddenExistentialDismissal
    @SuddenExistentialDismissal День тому

    What do you call it when they steal a key and come right on in when you are gone? And the police going through private paperwork in a sealed bag without a warrant?

  • @carlesiabibbins8070
    @carlesiabibbins8070 5 років тому +2

    Very helpful!

    • @studicata
      @studicata  5 років тому +1

      Awesome. Glad this helped! 👍

  • @ms.peaches2834
    @ms.peaches2834 Рік тому

    Hi,from Chicago South Side u r smart u made me understand this crazy system

  • @studicata
    @studicata  5 років тому +1

    🚨 SPECIAL OFFER: Want to crush law school finals, rack up scholarship $$$, pass the bar exam, and practice law like a BOSS? Take the LEAP. Get started today for free at: www.studicata.com/leap

  • @ahmednouh3409
    @ahmednouh3409 5 років тому +2

    You’re talented

  • @davidsoto4394
    @davidsoto4394 Рік тому +1

    This is a very hard concept. Excellent video.

    • @princessruth9155
      @princessruth9155 Рік тому

      i agree but isnt it great when u challenge ur brain? i love it!

  • @TheKriz503
    @TheKriz503 3 місяці тому

    If i lie to a police officer during the traffic stop can this law still defend me in court. For example the police officer asks “do you have anything illegal.” And i reply “no.” And the unlawfully search my car against my consent and find something illegal. Will the exclusionary rule still be something I can use in court?

  • @ds2disciple
    @ds2disciple 4 роки тому +2

    I have a Crim pro exam tomorrow and looking at this last minute lmao

  • @willu842
    @willu842 3 роки тому +1

    Regarding impeachment, when you say that impeachment doesn't apply to involuntary confessions under the 5th, do you mean confessions without an effective waiver (i.e., a coerced confession is not "voluntary" and thus no waiver has taken place) and thus cannot be used for impeachment purposes? Or 5th amendment violations in general?
    I think of Miranda encompassing both the 5th and 6th (although they have differences) so I am a little confused.

  • @oliviadeshane1602
    @oliviadeshane1602 2 роки тому +2

    Can the police enter someone's home to arrest them on a complaint but no warrant?

    • @princessruth9155
      @princessruth9155 Рік тому

      i wonder if police would even be involved without a warrant, its a procedural n civil rts issue...

    • @ThiagoRV967
      @ThiagoRV967 Рік тому

      @@princessruth9155 Oh yes, the police gets involved in warrantless arrests all the time. There are multiple exceptions to the warrant requirement that will establish when it is a valid or invalid warrantless arrest.

  • @JRBROOKS42
    @JRBROOKS42 2 роки тому

    THEY CANT TEACH THIS TO ALL HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATES !! 😡😡😡😡😡😳😳😳😳😳😳🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬😎😎😎😎😎😎💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💵💵💵💵💵💵💸💸💸💸💸💸🎥🎥🎥🎥🎥🎥

  • @amalaoun5233
    @amalaoun5233 4 роки тому +2

    I'm surprised you don't have a million views on these videos. uff

    • @studicata
      @studicata  4 роки тому +2

      We'll get there! Thanks for tuning in. 🙏

  • @walterboys2140
    @walterboys2140 4 роки тому +1

  • @jonathanlindsey7623
    @jonathanlindsey7623 5 місяців тому

    God is looking straight at you. Mars does not have the authority to find that sun. Nor do you have authority to find that gas. Nor do you have authority to find me?

  • @latejanaurbana1589
    @latejanaurbana1589 4 роки тому +2

    What if police do not know how to read

    • @princessruth9155
      @princessruth9155 Рік тому

      😁😂🤣😎😋 sis, in hawaii they dont read either! aloha!

    • @princessruth9155
      @princessruth9155 Рік тому

      the cops in hawaii shoot polynesian boys alot too.

  • @child_of_God223
    @child_of_God223 Рік тому

    How do you get a case over turn when you have dirty cops trying to keep u from doing that

    • @mizz9841
      @mizz9841 Рік тому +1

      Hire an experienced criminal defense attorney...

    • @child_of_God223
      @child_of_God223 Рік тому

      It's deeper than that but I understand

    • @mizz9841
      @mizz9841 Рік тому +1

      @@child_of_God223 I'm not making lite of your situation brother - cases are legit scary especially when dealing with police who are human - thus prone to lie and manipulate... Best of luck and I send you the best energy that I can...
      God Bless

  • @nicolesright4800
    @nicolesright4800 4 роки тому +1

    Can the police get a search warrant for a person that don't live in your house ?

    • @princessruth9155
      @princessruth9155 Рік тому

      how wld a warrant have someone elses adress on it with someone elses name? or lets flip it, perhaps putting the names of the homeowners AND the perp on it tho.... but i dont think thats workable on a regular. it really needs to fit. homeowners need to have culpability.

    • @princessruth9155
      @princessruth9155 Рік тому

      bro thats a nutz question! 😂🤣

    • @ThiagoRV967
      @ThiagoRV967 Рік тому +1

      Yes, as long as they have probable cause (maybe an informant) that the person is in that house. They can also corroborate the information by watching from the street and identifying the person they (the police) are looking for. Maybe the person's car was parked outside or near the house.
      I know this response is late, but it is to bring light to the question as the other responses were not too helpful.

    • @amandaaldecoa1482
      @amandaaldecoa1482 Рік тому +1

      @@ThiagoRV967 Great answer!! I will add to it by stating that when law enforcement has probable cause to believe that a suspect is in a third party's home, they MUST obtain a separate search warrant before entering the third party's home. Of course, there are exceptions to the warrant requirement, such as hot pursuit, exigent circumstances, etc.
      Again, that is an AMAZING answer...I am nervous about the previous answers because it can be dangerous to spread misinformation.

  • @shamec173
    @shamec173 4 роки тому +1

    Can the police hack your phone illegally and use whatever they find as evidence for a warrant?

    • @shamec173
      @shamec173 4 роки тому +1

      Without concent

    • @petu2123
      @petu2123 4 роки тому +1

      The police can't the government can though

    • @princessruth9155
      @princessruth9155 Рік тому

      the govt can but they still require a doj warrant at exac lvl. nixon didnt wanna get a warrant. so gordon liddy just taped (like sticky tape lol) the door. so cray. but they do it anyway.

    • @ThiagoRV967
      @ThiagoRV967 Рік тому

      @@petu2123 The police is the government...

    • @ThiagoRV967
      @ThiagoRV967 Рік тому

      Constitutionally, no they can't!

  • @planeofinertia7433
    @planeofinertia7433 Рік тому

    Miranda is a consensual contract offered, if not refuted, then becomes tacit, and an agreement (informal contract). With covenants (contracts) we generally forfeit our CONSTITUTIONAL GOD GIVEN RIGHTS (unless reserved)...
    That's why Miranda is applicable to the poisonous trees constitutional violations...
    Inevitability is simply "public" vs "private"... Miranda is Latinized as to mean "to be wondered at" (aka, admire, from mirrored).. read Shakespeare's, The Tempest.
    ~ INERTIA