This test is in Europe and Toyota over there didn’t have air bags but in the us air bags where demanded in 1994 and if you don’t have a front airbag you can’t sell the vehicle
The reason its like that is because new cars are designed to crumple partially. If not, all the momentum from the car will go to you, so even with a seatbelt, yould go flying.
Airbags still cut the shit out of your face if you hit your head in the dashboard as they deploy, cause that’s what 9 year old me had to go through. But at the same time, mom’s car was from 2010…
@theman5893 Yes. That solid steel bumper can do a lot. I once slid an 83 Oldsmobile Brougham Regency 98 into a dirt ditch at about 20 mph. The car bounced back on the road and kept going like nothing had happened. Do that in today's cars, not an SUV/Truck, and you would have major body damage, and if the airbags deploy, the car is considered totaled by the insurance company.
Then tell me that it’s not worth getting a newer car and make the payments. Had a 2018 civic that literally saved my ass in a 10 time rollover. My older previous 2006 forester wouldn’t have kept me alive as well.
I still love 90s boxy cars because id rather die fast than pay hundreds of thousands of hospital bills and be in pain for the rest of my life having a debilitating physical illness. Just me?
You wouldn’t die fast if it’s a low-speed accident, which would leave you potentially paralyzed (in the old car) instead of mildly injured (in the new car).
I think I like cars with airbags because if you get in a car accident and you hit your head on the steering wheel in the older version without your bags it’s gonna hurt, but if you have your car with airbags, it would not hurt so that’s why you should get cars were airbags
steampunk age airbags was experimental and mostlikely werent ready for cars or crash sensors wasnt ready ... i guess thats why you cant see on hih end brand/models
To be fair to the 98’ Camry, it just got hit by a much bigger, heavier and stronger modern car, so of course it was going to be destroyed. Had it been hit by another car of the same age it probably would’ve faired better.
If the world just drove safe, without any car to inorganic obstacle collisions, I doubt youwould ever have to worry. Even in a speedy rust bucket, you won't die just from coming into contact with any unexpected wildlife, at night.
yeah my ‘93 eagle talon will near 100% kill me in a wreck! i mean a car from the 90’s that has the capability of going 145mph from the factort is just asking for problems!
![Rollover and Car Crashes #01 [BeamNG.Drive]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/_zQUji5u7HI/mqdefault.jpg)
![Rollover and Car Crashes #01 [BeamNG.Drive]](/img/tr.png)
Google:Airbags were made in early 1970s
Toyota in 80s and 90s:Nah fuck Airbags we live life on the edge
back then they were more expensive and they became mandatory only in 1995
My 95 Tacoma only has a driver side airbag, was listed as a feature.
airbags are mandatory in 1995
cars before 1995 :
This test is in Europe and Toyota over there didn’t have air bags but in the us air bags where demanded in 1994 and if you don’t have a front airbag you can’t sell the vehicle
My first car was a 1994 BMW 740iL. No airbags at all, but it was a tank. Volvo was one of the few companies using airbags before they were mandatory.
#1 They’re both Toyota Corollas
#2 Airbags for the win
#3 Crush points are better in the newer model.
Yes
the new corolla is the size and weight of a 90's avensis
I was about to correct you because the caption says mazda, but upon closer inspection, that is a corolla.... ig toyota and mazda are partners
tf are you on obv its a corolla
@@turbogamer_982realthe video says it’s a Mazda
2016 car is not Mazda it's a toyota.
They are actually sold under Mazda brand name in some countries i think
@@zzoinks Stop at 0:01 and you can clearly see that the badge is Toyota.
I wanna see a full sized full frame 2.3 ton 1970s cadillac or lincoln against the toyota!!
Its a Scion not a Toyota
@@randomthingsstuff6591 Toyota cars are sold under the Scion brand in some countries.
Also what’s the point replying to a 2 year old comment lol.
The reason its like that is because new cars are designed to crumple partially. If not, all the momentum from the car will go to you, so even with a seatbelt, yould go flying.
we dont need features to keep humans alive we need population control we are overcrowded
While Tesla cybertruck:
😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢🤕🤕🤕🤕🤕🤒🤒🤒🤒😷😷😷😷🤧🤧🤧🤧🤢🤢🤢🤢😱😱😱😨😨😨😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😓😓😓
@@chanthakuyhii Cambodian 😮
The survivor got me dying tho☠️
Unlike the dummy in the 90's car
"Mazda al"
The very obvious toyota: am I a joke to you?
Love finding an engine in my lap. Makes my day ❤
In a 1950's car this happens
Wow it’s almost like it’s newer and better tech and design
Is not a 1998 toyota camery that's a 1998 toyota crollla
It's not a crollla either
They’re both Corollas
bruh its not even a crolla its a corolla
People should talk about why there aren't crash ratings for SUV/light trucks and sedans
There literally is
What are you talking about, they're there just like all the other cars
Airbags still cut the shit out of your face if you hit your head in the dashboard as they deploy, cause that’s what 9 year old me had to go through. But at the same time, mom’s car was from 2010…
My mums car is almost as old as her and she’s 42
Mm yes, the ‘camery.’
They weren’t kidding when they said “Let’s go places.”
That sent CHILLS down my SPINE :SKULL: :GHOST:
This is why cars cost more. At least you live.
They cost triple. 😅
They also can't survive a deer.
@@nonyabusiness4151you think the old one can?
@theman5893 Yes. That solid steel bumper can do a lot.
I once slid an 83 Oldsmobile Brougham Regency 98 into a dirt ditch at about 20 mph. The car bounced back on the road and kept going like nothing had happened.
Do that in today's cars, not an SUV/Truck, and you would have major body damage, and if the airbags deploy, the car is considered totaled by the insurance company.
The reason nobody talks about them is because nobody who owns a 90s corrola is concerned about safety
Then tell me that it’s not worth getting a newer car and make the payments. Had a 2018 civic that literally saved my ass in a 10 time rollover. My older previous 2006 forester wouldn’t have kept me alive as well.
Idk man I was in a 92 civic that hit a knee wall at 65 then rolled 4 times I walked away. I think it's just very situational lol
Yeah
It’s called “cars have been around for like a century and we’re still trying to figure out how to make them safe”
There’s 20 years of crash technology between the two and a massive weight difference
imagine the guy died with legs cut
The 1998 bro just got demolished
In the 90’s da cars we’re dangerous probably
I still love 90s boxy cars because id rather die fast than pay hundreds of thousands of hospital bills and be in pain for the rest of my life having a debilitating physical illness. Just me?
Mad respect cause I rather do with the hospital than with the funeral
You wouldn’t die fast if it’s a low-speed accident, which would leave you potentially paralyzed (in the old car) instead of mildly injured (in the new car).
Your comment is BS
@@user-sf7kl9uh7k ok
@@DitiPengmy big brother got into a crash in a 1997 Toyota Avalon. He lived, not paralyzed, completely fine. (an 83 year old man cut him off)
This is everywhere in the search 💀💀💀
Thats Corolla VS Corolla.
Bro in the old Toyota got freaking obliterated💀💀💀💀
Look up the dateline 90s crash tests! Its insane how far weve come, also the first airbag crash was between two 89 chrysler Lebarons!
If me and the boys got a car:
I remember being a kid watching these video before becoming a car guy 😭😭
Love my 80s coupe
That’s a 80s car
It says 1998 Toyota on the hood
Instad of the airbag going off it flew off😂☠️
Mazda Artificial intelligence💀💀💀
Lived but with broken legs and arms along with a liver failure, heart problems, mental issues, disabilities
I think I like cars with airbags because if you get in a car accident and you hit your head on the steering wheel in the older version without your bags it’s gonna hurt, but if you have your car with airbags, it would not hurt so that’s why you should get cars were airbags
The 90s toyota:No airbags,we die like real men
No airbags...and we die like a real men...
Rolecage has entered the chat
blud got out in a rule 1 💀
No one is talking about it because they most likely expect that to be the result.
A lot of people think metal vehicles are safer than plastic ones..
@@cjsantos6247plastic cars?
Because there are always myths about old things being durable in every aspect.
steampunk age airbags was experimental and mostlikely werent ready for cars or crash sensors wasnt ready ... i guess thats why you cant see on hih end brand/models
*2016 Has Beef With The 1990s*
I never talked about it because I never knew
and all these kids want a beat up 90s jdm that they swear is the fastest, until the max out at 90mph and hit a tree and turn into spaghetti
I think people here talking about it, that’s why the IIHS created a whole new kind of crash test for this exact impact because of it
Bro kiss the airbag💀💀💀
To be fair to the 98’ Camry, it just got hit by a much bigger, heavier and stronger modern car, so of course it was going to be destroyed. Had it been hit by another car of the same age it probably would’ve faired better.
Cool
Me and my friends are driving in GTA be like😂😂😂😂
Airbags obviously removed 😂
Okay now crash test an 80s Volvo 740 with a 2016 Corolla
Am I the only one who thought they had real people in it, like my heart stopped for a sec-
Me thinking that 1998 toyota camery and 2016 Mazda ai is real: 👁️ 👄 👁️
If the world just drove safe, without any car to inorganic obstacle collisions, I doubt youwould ever have to worry. Even in a speedy rust bucket, you won't die just from coming into contact with any unexpected wildlife, at night.
I'd still take a 1985 Ford LTD ANY day!!!!!
"no air bags we die like real men"
Even wheni looked at the airbag and wanted to sleep at it.
This guy is clearly a Mazda fan if he’s saying that the white Toyota Corolla is a mazda
No one is talking about it cause they failed to make the drivers seat they put it on right
The seat wasn’t the problem 😂
in the 90s people could drive unlike now
Wait- when was this?
No one talks about it cuz it’s so obvious that we don’t need to talk about it
'Died'
Yeah no shit bruh
No one‘s talking about it because the results are obvious
no air bag too dang
TTS: “WhY tEh FaK nO one TaLk BoUt ThIs”
M63 Group: bcz u suk
Hmm cause maybe people in the 90s weren't dumb enough to go 90 miles per hour into a car and the other car doing the same
1998 Toyota Corolla vs 2015 Toyota Corolla
Yes
Almost like technology because more advanced over the years.
bro kissed on that thing 😳
The 1999 car then it had a airbag that's too dangerous
yeah my ‘93 eagle talon will near 100% kill me in a wreck! i mean a car from the 90’s that has the capability of going 145mph from the factort is just asking for problems!
is no one talking about the 2016 car looks like a renault
Because of the airbags
Why is no one talking about this maybe bc it’s an older car so we expect less safety
I noticed it wasn't a 1973 Cadillac 75 series against the 2016 Mazda.
It seems like the modern cars have airbags. The older 1998 car doesnt have an airbag which would make even more chances of death from an car crash
Both got destroyed tho lol
Sound is 💀
The black car's airbag didn't come out!?
Not the old Corolla 😢
Wow🤩
About my calculations. Cars that realese 80s to 90s doesn’t have airbag . It release on 2009
No? Airbags became mandatory in 1998.
Lived but with terrible injuries
Nooo bc it popped up on my Alexa out of nowhere and no one clicked it
How about: old vs old
Both got destroyed but one of them is safer
Toyota Quality: 🤮
Volvo quality: 💀
What did you expect? It’s old😂
First of all, its obvious that the 90s car would get destroyed, second of all, let the past remain past.
And also no one wants to talk sbout crash tests
Airbags are not the main thing of safety
Build quality is the main thing
Nah I'd Survive
No crap the old car will do worse in the crash test
The air bag
Because they don't give a shit and so do I.
Unless someone you love is driving one of those crap cars my friend
@@pressstart1490True
@@pressstart1490true
Camry is 🔥
Because we aren't in the 90s mo more.thay why
WELL NAHHHHHH
Bc what you’re dealing daily isn’t an old car. Those got more steel and heavier than!
Damn maybe because newer cars are built better than old cars. What is there to talk about