Time of flight mass spectrometer calculations

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 бер 2020
  • This video takes you through how to rearrange the formula for kinetic energy to give velocity, and then how to use this in conjunction with knowing the length of the flight tube in calculating time of flight (and all the other variations). I also show you how to calculate the mass of a single ion from the isotope's molar mass.
    If you are mathematically minded and can show how the equations are derived, brilliant! You need to be able to do this in examination questions.
    If you are, like me, mathematically challenged, then spend some time studying how one equation comes from another, and memorise it - it's far easier in the long run.
    😱 Correction for Q.1 - see photo of my notes on Google drive link for correct working and answer: drive.google.com/file/d/1Rind...
    You can find notes and exam style questions on this at crunchchemistry.co.uk/time-of... 😀.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 35

  • @CrunchChemistry
    @CrunchChemistry  3 роки тому +8

    Please click link (Google drive photo) for correction to Q1 - huge apologies! 😊
    drive.google.com/file/d/1RindprJmQOrq0t6-j95Ww9KSB5CqQs7U/view?usp=sharing

  • @pickle_1395
    @pickle_1395 Місяць тому +7

    revisiting this video the night before my chem paper 1

  • @anonymous-iu4th
    @anonymous-iu4th 2 роки тому +19

    Thanks I've been trying to understand TOF for ages my textbook has absolutely none of the calculations or even any of the formulas

    • @CrunchChemistry
      @CrunchChemistry  2 роки тому +1

      I'm really pleased this video has ticked all the boxes - unfortunately your textbook is only ever going to give you an overview of any topic at A level, so you need to mine your teachers' / school / college expertise and past papers. There is a bank of TOF exam questions with detailed worked through answers at crunchchemistry.co.uk in the Atoms, Ions and Molecules unit 😊

    • @anonymous-iu4th
      @anonymous-iu4th 2 роки тому

      @@CrunchChemistry thank you

  • @pickle_1395
    @pickle_1395 Рік тому +5

    What a helpful video. Thanks !

  • @bilalhussain3966
    @bilalhussain3966 Рік тому +10

    Hi, you should use unrounded values to calculate your answers and only round at the end because it effects the accuracy of your answer. With unrounded values aka accurate values I got 5.31*10^-6s

    • @CrunchChemistry
      @CrunchChemistry  Рік тому

      Absolutely - number one rule is not to round up to 2 or 3 sig fig during any calculation, but the settings on your calculator (as in to how many sig fig or decimal places it cuts off your calculations) also explains why answers may vary

  • @elisaelakaradag6348
    @elisaelakaradag6348 3 місяці тому +1

    Thank you so much! seriously the way you explain things really helped me understand.

  • @m09nbby18
    @m09nbby18 3 роки тому +1

    thank you so much!!!

  • @abaakofa1399
    @abaakofa1399 3 роки тому +7

    So helpful! Thank you

    • @CrunchChemistry
      @CrunchChemistry  3 роки тому +3

      The key is to mastering this is practice - I know the text books are a bit useless on ToF calculations, so scour the past papers for questions.

  • @laurenhancock4181
    @laurenhancock4181 2 роки тому

    thanks- super helpful!

  • @oldmanjenkins3245
    @oldmanjenkins3245 2 роки тому +1

    thank you

  • @notsezz5318
    @notsezz5318 3 роки тому +2

    appreciate the help thanks

  • @itzbigdelly3118
    @itzbigdelly3118 Рік тому +3

    Hi, thanks for the video and I now fully understand TOF but, on the last question, could you explain to me how you were able to get a time of 5.23 x 10^-6 because I got 5.27 x 10^-, unless my answer as well is accepted?

    • @CrunchChemistry
      @CrunchChemistry  Рік тому +1

      So pleased you have got this sorted - I've gone back to my original video notes and I also have an answer of 5.268 x 10^-6s so another typo and another apology 😐

  • @sophiedresner8787
    @sophiedresner8787 Рік тому

    Hello, great video this has really helped me understand TOF calculations, in the last question I got 5.314747263 x 10^-16, ( rounded it up to 5.3 however ), I think this is due to me not rounding the numbers up until the end so will there be a range the answers is in?

    • @CrunchChemistry
      @CrunchChemistry  Рік тому

      You shouldn't round up until your final answer, then cut it off at the appropriate number of significant figures - your answer will be fine x 10^-6 not x10^-16? (it can depend slightly on calculator settings).

    • @sophiedresner8787
      @sophiedresner8787 Рік тому +1

      @@CrunchChemistry yeah I never round up until my final answer and oh yeah 10^-6 lol, thank you again!

  • @ashd1680
    @ashd1680 2 роки тому +1

    thanks for saving me in my test gyal

  • @m09nbby18
    @m09nbby18 3 роки тому +2

    Could you perhaps consider doing ionic equations?

    • @CrunchChemistry
      @CrunchChemistry  3 роки тому +1

      Have a look in the atoms. ions and molecules playlist - there is one ready for you!

  • @joseaelizabeth4938
    @joseaelizabeth4938 3 роки тому +1

    Can someone tell me how the mass calculation in the first question works

    • @CrunchChemistry
      @CrunchChemistry  3 роки тому

      Where have I lost you specifically? Let me know and I'll work through it with you.

    • @joseaelizabeth4938
      @joseaelizabeth4938 3 роки тому +4

      @@CrunchChemistry in the first one i worked out the mass the same way you did it and i ended up with a completely different number

    • @CrunchChemistry
      @CrunchChemistry  3 роки тому +7

      @@joseaelizabeth4938 I'm so sorry, you are quite right, the mass should be 3.985 x 10-26kg from the Mg ion. See the link in the pinned comment for the working from my notes.

  • @chu2000
    @chu2000 Рік тому

    in a MS where a tof question is 3 marks why is the mass used for 49Ti + not 49/6.022x1023 /1000 but its just 49. so the answer for question is much bigger than mine

    • @CrunchChemistry
      @CrunchChemistry  11 місяців тому

      Sorry, I've only just seen this! I'd need to see the whole question but you've probably figured it out now.