Quaternions

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 230

  • @lopezb
    @lopezb Рік тому +21

    Beautiful lecture, thanks! Just the right amount of detail.
    Quaternions were invented by William Rowan Hamilton (also invented Hamiltonian Mechanics) in 1843. Heisenberg was one of the fathers of Quantum Mechanics in 1925.

    • @KaiseruSoze
      @KaiseruSoze Рік тому

      I was going to point this out too. But I was betting someone else spotted the error. TY.

    • @joaogonzalez4082
      @joaogonzalez4082 10 місяців тому +1

      Yep, I was going to state that also. But Gibbs did simplified its math to vector algebra as we know today 😏

    • @gokceyildirim8161
      @gokceyildirim8161 9 місяців тому +2

      Heisenberg might have invented octonions to explain particle spins for quantum mechanics

  • @calmsh0t
    @calmsh0t 5 років тому +34

    Praise the age of digitalization. I can get all the knowledge I want from great sources and don't need to rely on local professors who can't explain even the simplest thing, plus I can filter out the stuff that university would want me to know but I never need for what I want to do. What a time to be alive!!

  • @dendrogenhs
    @dendrogenhs 8 років тому +45

    This lecture skips details, and the presenter does mistakes, but he really gets the intuition: this is the easiest to understand video about quaternions I ve found so far...

  • @realdeal968
    @realdeal968 8 років тому +51

    I watched countless videos on quaternions and this one is the best by far.

  • @JA-yi8bs
    @JA-yi8bs 3 роки тому +9

    A concept I was not taught at University and now faced with in my research. Your explanation has been so helpful for my understanding - thank you!

  • @DellHell1
    @DellHell1 8 років тому +154

    He said Heisenberg because he wasn't certain who it was. But when he stood still he became certain it was Hamilton.

  • @DrMerle-gw4wj
    @DrMerle-gw4wj Рік тому +4

    Quaternions were created by William Hamilton, not Heisenberg. No doubt someone has already added this in the comments.

  • @APaleDot
    @APaleDot Рік тому +7

    26:40
    He says the quaternion ( cosθ, sinθ v ) represents a rotation by angle θ, but it actually represents a rotation by angle 2θ.
    The reason: when doing a rotation, you do a "sandwich" product to prevent the vector from being pushed into 4D space, u' = q u q^-1 which applies the quaternion twice, resulting in a rotation by 2θ.

    • @zdspider6778
      @zdspider6778 5 місяців тому

      Yeah, that's what I thought!
      It should be: _(cos(θ/2), sin(θ/2) * v)_
      And he didn't explain the "sandwich" part... At least I don't think he did. And there's no "part 2".

  • @JackLe1127
    @JackLe1127 8 років тому +195

    best part about watching youtube lectures is that you gain the knowledge but you don't have to do the homework

    • @karz12
      @karz12 8 років тому +32

      You can't gain the knowledge without doing the homework.

    • @ZeusLT
      @ZeusLT 8 років тому +5

      why not

    • @johnjackson9767
      @johnjackson9767 8 років тому

      +karz12 Word.

    • @s.u.5285
      @s.u.5285 7 років тому +23

      i prefer saying..best thing about you-tube college learning is you gain the knowledge without having to pay for it.

    • @That_One_Guy...
      @That_One_Guy... 5 років тому +1

      Advantage of online learning :
      1.Gain knowledge
      2. Choose to do or not to do homework (with freedom to choose when to do one)
      3.Sometimes a much clearer explanation than your lecturer tried way too hard to explain (for math i loved this so much)
      4. Need just a waaay shorter time time than the boring and weekly long explained things in your college
      5. Free of cost
      6.Never get left behind because of the bullshit limited amount time (see point 4)
      7. Learning becoming much effective also because you're free from stressfull environment (annoying and noisy idiot kids who keeps babbling about something trivial, bullies) (i feel like stressful environment is one of the biggest obstacle of studying properly beside worst teaching and limited time BS)
      Why does offline learning isn't removed yet sigh. For anyone complaining about social interaction for same age, i ask you how does people in the past (where school isnt even exist yet) interact with each other ?

  • @michaell685
    @michaell685 3 роки тому +3

    Per Wikipedia, not Heisenberg (1937-1976) but Rodriguez & Hamilton in the 1840s developed Quaternions. Hamilton was its great advocate.
    " Quaternions and their applications to rotations were first described in print by Olinde Rodrigues in all but name in 1840,[1] but independently discovered by Irish mathematician Sir William Rowan Hamilton in 1843 and applied to mechanics in three-dimensional space. They find uses in both theoretical and applied mathematics, in particular for calculations involving three-dimensional rotations."

  • @AlfredEssa
    @AlfredEssa 8 років тому +192

    Hamilton, not Heisenberg.

    • @random_guy6608
      @random_guy6608 6 років тому +1

      Idiot hamilton thinking about quaternions on his way to Party

    • @robrick9361
      @robrick9361 6 років тому +10

      I heard Hamilton used his knowledge of Quaternions to become a drug kingpin.
      I AM THE ONE WHO EXTENDS COMPLEX NUMBERS!

    • @abenedict85
      @abenedict85 5 років тому +2

      @@random_guy6608 show some respect for your intellectual masters

    • @That_One_Guy...
      @That_One_Guy... 5 років тому +1

      So that's why electrons location are uncertain, because they're 4d beings

    • @mikeh283
      @mikeh283 4 роки тому

      Thank you!

  • @englishforfunandcompetitio248
    @englishforfunandcompetitio248 3 роки тому +3

    Aside from mistakes in mentioning History, the intuitive approach he has applied for teaching the subject, is better than many others on the UA-cam.

  • @LibrawLou
    @LibrawLou 9 років тому +110

    Excellent introduction via rotations, but the discoverer was Hamilton, not Heisenberg.

    • @LibrawLou
      @LibrawLou 9 років тому +1

      Pharap Sama
      History otta' at least be in the right century...however fascinating the math...

    • @dlwatib
      @dlwatib 9 років тому +5

      +Lou Puls He at least remembered that it was a long name beginning with H. But is it so difficult to remember that it was an Irish mathematician in the 1800s and not a German physicist in the 1900s?

    • @gfetco
      @gfetco 9 років тому +3

      +Lou Puls Say my name!

    • @morgengabe1
      @morgengabe1 8 років тому

      Yourre mothers would all b so proud

    • @ahmedgaafar5369
      @ahmedgaafar5369 7 років тому

      i agree too.

  • @mikedavid5071
    @mikedavid5071 Рік тому +1

    This is a great intuitive introduction to Quaternions. Knowing who invented quaternions gets you nowhere in understanding quaternions. Knowing the name means nothing. Knowing how to use them and forging new fields where they have practical use is quite useful.

  • @onetwoBias
    @onetwoBias 9 років тому +7

    Excellent lesson! :) Impressive that he managed to make this comprehensible to someone with only a basic understanding of vector math in three dimensions, who has never heard of quaternions. (me)

  • @baruchba7503
    @baruchba7503 Рік тому +1

    Best explanation of quaternions I've heard. Thank you.

  • @vwcanter
    @vwcanter Рік тому

    This is a valuable introduction, for people like me, who need to get started on these.

  • @slickwillie3376
    @slickwillie3376 5 років тому +4

    They were first described by Irish mathematician William Rowan Hamilton in 1843 and applied to mechanics in three-dimensional space.

  • @ksbalaji1287
    @ksbalaji1287 4 роки тому

    For the first time, I am beginning to understand Quaternions. Thanks, Prof!

  • @cyborgbeingadroidthinklike5737
    @cyborgbeingadroidthinklike5737 4 роки тому

    His attitude of teaching shows that he is very much conscious about his topics

  • @yunhyeokchoi2004
    @yunhyeokchoi2004 8 років тому +21

    8:36 humanity restored

  • @shivanshiverma8025
    @shivanshiverma8025 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you for explaining with such an elegancy, sir! I've been stuck on this topic for a long time now, and finally you made me understand it 😁😁

  • @andyeverett1957
    @andyeverett1957 4 роки тому +1

    Much about quaternions just fell into place with your lecture, thanks.

  • @yiyangtang3622
    @yiyangtang3622 9 років тому +1

    This is an clear explanation about quarernions, thanks a lot

  • @emmanuelmorales5332
    @emmanuelmorales5332 8 років тому

    You Sir rock! After too much trying, I think I understand attitude quaternions at last!

  • @lawrencedoliveiro9104
    @lawrencedoliveiro9104 7 років тому +6

    Another useful feature of quaternions is that they interpolate very nicely, which is useful for animations.
    Say you have two orientations of an armature bone in your character. Each orientation can be represented by a quaternion. If these are keyframes, then the animation software can interpolate the intermediate orientations by interpolating the quaternions. This automatically gives you a uniform movement along the great circle connecting the two orientation points.
    If you were trying to interpolate Euler angles, then you would not (in general) get movement along a great circle. I think the actual curve might be a loxodrome (I’m not sure). In any case, it won’t look nice.

  • @lunchen7985
    @lunchen7985 3 роки тому +1

    28:00 is the punch line if you're here wondering how quaternions can be used for rotations and for solving gimbal lock

  • @benmansourmahdi9097
    @benmansourmahdi9097 Рік тому

    professor i owe you for ever

  • @JohnCena963852
    @JohnCena963852 3 роки тому +6

    May not be perfect for some details, but definitely the best clarify of quaternion. Thank you sir.
    btw, does anyone know which OCW does this lecture belong to?

  • @johntessin6398
    @johntessin6398 9 років тому +3

    William Rowan Hamilton invented ( discovered ) them. There is a wonderful neighborhood in the area called South Park in San Diego called Hamiltons that specializes in micro brews. I find a twisted satisfaction in that for some reason.

  • @miltonlai4850
    @miltonlai4850 2 роки тому

    Easy to understand, very good explanation.

  • @pavelperina7629
    @pavelperina7629 6 років тому +3

    34:00 please always remember original matrix, construct quaternion from original mouse position to the current one, construct quaternion (i guess there should be phi/2, but i'm not sure) and the convert it to model matrix. On mouse release store that model matrix. Otherwise they will be ugly artifacts caused by sampling of mouse coodinates and I guess rounding errors as well.
    PS: i have to find how to convert quaternion into 4x4 matrix, because it would be nice to visualize that in some projections. I always found q^bar * v * q as 3x3 matrix

  • @TheSemgold
    @TheSemgold 3 роки тому

    It's interesting to know about quaternions analysis.

  • @MatheusLB2009
    @MatheusLB2009 6 років тому +8

    The F1 Driver, not the Meth cooker

  • @NoisySoundFilms
    @NoisySoundFilms 7 років тому +4

    is there a second part of this lecture? i would like to a real application of how to move objects on 3D space. By the way! it has been a very great time seeing this lecture!

  • @thejking
    @thejking 5 років тому

    Finally I get it! Very very good lecture!

  • @OlivierGeorg
    @OlivierGeorg Рік тому

    Good basic but approximative and incomplete explaination, which pushed me to search for more information:
    1) Rotation by \phi around \vec(v) is given by q = (cos(\phi/2), sin(\phi/2) \vec(v))
    2) A position vector can be represented by p = (0, \vec(x,y,z))
    3) Rotation of p by q is given by quaternion operation p' = q * p * q^(-1). That operation is said to be computationaly cheaper than using matrices.

  • @mattwolf2887
    @mattwolf2887 9 років тому +2

    Really great lecture. Thanks :D

  • @johnhefele5432
    @johnhefele5432 4 роки тому +1

    Does anyone have these notes that the lecturer keeps referring to? If so, could you kindly share them?

  • @stevel9678
    @stevel9678 6 років тому +1

    Quaternions were invented by Alexander Hamilton. Heisenberg was the meth kingpin on Breaking Bad. Glad I could straighten that out.

  • @liamcjbeistle3274
    @liamcjbeistle3274 5 років тому

    William Rowan Hamilton used for navigation gimbals, simulation motion platforms etc

  • @ogunfidodoadekunle2807
    @ogunfidodoadekunle2807 2 роки тому

    I find quaternions applicable to statistics,also find useful the idea of (cosx+sinx.v) where v is a unit vector.

  • @TheLazyKey
    @TheLazyKey 9 років тому

    Great video on quaternions. I still don't quite understand them fully. But I'm sure applying them practically will help me fill in the gaps.

  • @Supercatzs
    @Supercatzs 4 роки тому +1

    Quaternions start at 7:07

  • @abhinavkumarkumar3370
    @abhinavkumarkumar3370 8 років тому +2

    Why there is -v1.v2 when multiplying q1and q2. @17 mins

  • @geoffreygoldman1115
    @geoffreygoldman1115 7 років тому +1

    Nice lecture. I have a much better conceptual understanding of quaternions.

  • @bsergean
    @bsergean 9 років тому +1

    Great presentation

  • @piotrlenarczyk5803
    @piotrlenarczyk5803 8 років тому

    Great and impresive: Keep It Super Simple:)

  • @iraqplayer7270
    @iraqplayer7270 5 років тому +1

    In case someone is looking for the cheat sheet the professor is referring to:
    graphics.cs.ucdavis.edu/~joy/ecs178/Transformations/Quaternions.pdf

    • @pierresarrailh6617
      @pierresarrailh6617 5 років тому

      thanks a ton I really needed it and cant access the site as I am not a student

    • @iraqplayer7270
      @iraqplayer7270 5 років тому

      @@pierresarrailh6617 You are welcome! So you have gotten the cheat sheet right?

    • @iraqplayer7270
      @iraqplayer7270 5 років тому

      @1 conscience 0 dimension Good to hear! and yea, I searched up the matrix, it seems interesting.

  • @justbeyondthemath4559
    @justbeyondthemath4559 2 роки тому +2

    Quaternions are the first step to fixing Euclidean space. To the beginner, you can think of i,j,k as 90 degree rotations in the respective planes. Just like the Argand plane (complex plane) or i plane in the quaternions.
    1xi = i ixi =-1 -1 x i = -i and -i x i = 1 which puts us back to where we started. BTW I right multiplied to show you next state but technically it should be left side.

  • @aylasedai2317
    @aylasedai2317 8 років тому +3

    Hamilton?

  • @shohamsen8986
    @shohamsen8986 8 років тому +33

    Did he say heisenberg??? Waaaaaat

    • @thetntm2
      @thetntm2 8 років тому +6

      +Shoham Sen it wasn't heisenberg. The man who discovered quaternions was sir William Rowan Hamilton.

    • @shohamsen8986
      @shohamsen8986 8 років тому +4

      thetntm yeah i know hence the question mark... :)

    • @comprehensiveboy
      @comprehensiveboy 8 років тому +1

      That was terrible misinformation. I can only guess it is because some people are not too interested is who did what.

    • @ChristianS1978
      @ChristianS1978 8 років тому

      +comprehensiveboy
      According to Simon Altmann (cf. Wikipedia) it was Carl Friedrich Gauss in 1819 (only published in 1900).

    • @Beon234
      @Beon234 8 років тому +29

      +Shoham Sen "I am the one who rotates" - Heisenberg

  • @GeForece6200
    @GeForece6200 7 років тому

    Really really good lecture!!

  • @jairo359
    @jairo359 2 роки тому

    Im a dumbass and I can tell that this lecture is a good one, just watch it a few times over.

  • @SowmyanarayananP
    @SowmyanarayananP 8 років тому +1

    Great! Thank you so much!

  • @Ybalrid
    @Ybalrid 7 років тому +1

    I actually write good amonts of code using quaternions (because, 3D games and VR stuff) I never really fully understood what was these "4 numbers things", and how it can represent, well, rotation around an arbitrary axis, and why you multiply them togeter to get sucessive rotations, and all that jazz ^^"

  • @richardfantz5694
    @richardfantz5694 8 років тому +1

    1. Maxwell's original 20 quaternions instead of the dumbed-down, truncated equations he and Heaviside later developed which is what everyone's taught in school + Nikola Tesla + Non-Herzian waves = Enough said.

  • @phartatmisassa5035
    @phartatmisassa5035 9 років тому +2

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaternion#Matrix_representations
    Hmmm,
    So I was sittin on the porch tonight thinkin, and the following is the question I came up with. Given vectors U, V elements of R3 and a quaternion (say) Q element of H s/t Q is the quaternion which rotates U to V ( as with the track-ball), Is it possible to find Q' (Q prime), i.e. the dQ/dV, or the derivative of Q with respect to the change of V s/t V rotates to U. Would that even be useful?

  • @MarincasChannel
    @MarincasChannel 8 років тому +12

    Great lecture! But I'm still confused why quaternions actually use θ/2 instead of θ to represent an axis-angle rotation. My brain reaches a gimbal lock when thinking about this.

    • @BlueinRhapsody
      @BlueinRhapsody 8 років тому +13

      It is because to perform a rotation with quaternions on some 3-vector v, we take our unit quaternion p to get v' = p v p^-1.
      When we multiply p times v, we rotate on the unit sphere, but we also rotate into the fourth dimension [p v = (*-p dot v*, p_0 v + p x v)]. When we multiply after this by p^-1, we rotate back out of the fourth dimension by the same amount, and we also rotate forward by the same amount on the unit sphere.
      Basically, the first multiplication rotates us halfway there (and a little the wrong way), and the second multiplication rotates us the rest of the way there (and cancels out that 4D bit).

    • @francescorizzi2601
      @francescorizzi2601 3 роки тому +1

      @@BlueinRhapsody please, if you can give any reference link to explain exactly this phenomenon it would be great. I'm struggling to understand this.
      Thank you!

    • @BlueinRhapsody
      @BlueinRhapsody 3 роки тому

      @@francescorizzi2601 Honestly, I just learned about quaternion rotation from Wikipedia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaternions_and_spatial_rotation

  • @8cccpeevostokzempf
    @8cccpeevostokzempf Рік тому +2

    Not too sure about the Heisenberg reference.

  • @pianochannel100
    @pianochannel100 3 роки тому

    Go play with 3 blue 1 brown's interactive video lectures if you want to learn about quaternions.

  • @chanm01
    @chanm01 8 років тому +2

    ...now kinda wishing I had studied computer graphics in university instead.

  • @SwapanChakravarthy
    @SwapanChakravarthy 2 роки тому

    If one tries to define the norm of complex and others the values of i-sq and j-sq etc is equal to (- ) 1.

  • @abj1203
    @abj1203 3 роки тому

    Which website he keeps mentioning?

  • @justbeyondthemath4559
    @justbeyondthemath4559 2 роки тому

    As a former engineering math professor I would suggest you watch his video series. He has such a good grasp of the geometrics of the math, it will make the complicated math grinding make sense when you apply it. Plus he is actually teaching this stuff not just writing stuff on the board and explaining what he is writing. BTW the very best explanation of Hamilton trying to multiply triplets and what his hang up was. The rest becomes intuitive.

  • @definesigint2823
    @definesigint2823 6 років тому

    [breaks chalk] Well, somebody obviously supplied this classroom with right-handed chalk.

  • @tcioaca
    @tcioaca 8 років тому

    Well, Heisenberg is probably the biggest inaccuracy. I would like a more solid explanation of what "gimbal lock" actually means. In this lecture, the gimbal lock is explained as if it were originating from another source of singularity inducing factor (alignment of two spatial vectors if I get his intuition correctly). A better approach to understanding gimbal lock is to _explain_ how the gimbal mechanism works. Students usually invoke gimbal lock every time their rotations work incorrectly or stumble upon a singularity.. which is not always caused by this phenomenon.

  • @the_nuwarrior
    @the_nuwarrior 3 роки тому

    ¿it can be generalizated to a 2^n- dimentional object?, ¿ exist an n such that it forms a cunmutative field ?

  • @bestergester4100
    @bestergester4100 5 років тому

    I don't understand here at 26:12, what's the theta here represents?

  • @KunalShah62
    @KunalShah62 9 років тому

    Where did the 5th term in quaternion multiplication come from?

  • @meriquirogaalbarracin2420
    @meriquirogaalbarracin2420 8 місяців тому

    God bles you bro❤😊😊😊

  • @wisdomokafor9631
    @wisdomokafor9631 7 місяців тому

    I don’t get the multiplication part.

  • @gerardoconnor4278
    @gerardoconnor4278 7 років тому

    William Rowan Hamilton Trinity College Dublin - discoverer of quaternions

  • @soda9197
    @soda9197 2 місяці тому

    What course is this a part of?

  • @TheRCrispim
    @TheRCrispim 8 років тому +3

    Hamilton, not Heisenberg. •-•

  • @MykelGloober
    @MykelGloober 8 років тому

    So is the V value equal to the pitch, yaw, and roll? Or is that just the vector value? Can anyone point me to a lecture that talks about vector math?

  • @debendragurung3033
    @debendragurung3033 6 років тому

    If I know linear algebra, how much time do I have to learn this

  • @notevolverastontopensando
    @notevolverastontopensando 4 місяці тому

    "Against the day" by Thomas Pynchon

  • @zdspider6778
    @zdspider6778 5 місяців тому

    Hamilton invented the quaternion, not... Heisenberg. There's even a plaque on a bridge in Dublin where it "hit" him to use "ijk". He wrote it down as: _i^2 = j^2 = k^2 = ijk = −1_

  • @zeeshanijaz2870
    @zeeshanijaz2870 9 років тому +1

    Around 10:00 the professor says that Heisenberg was not able to figure out ij and was forced to add another term dk to tackle the problem.Well my question is if the assumption we make is that i square = -1 and j square = -1 then it follows that ij = -1. So it is not undefined. So there was never even a problem to start with. Can somebody answer this please

    • @abeno62
      @abeno62 8 років тому +2

      +Zeeshan Ijaz I am no mathematician, but I don't see how you can infere that ij equals minus 1. With the assumption that i^2=j^2=-1, we only can say that i^2 = j^2 nothing more. If I follow your path, you would end up with i=j and then it's completely useless because you only get 'simple' complex numbers.

    • @HeliosFire9ll
      @HeliosFire9ll 8 років тому

      +Zeeshan Ijaz
      I've come with the same conclusion, did you ever find the answer to this question?

    • @maxwibert
      @maxwibert 8 років тому +5

      1^2=1 and (-1)^2=1, yet 1*(-1)=-1. so i have a counterexample to the argument "a^2=c and b^2=c implies a*b=c."

    • @HeliosFire9ll
      @HeliosFire9ll 8 років тому

      ok this makes sense now thank you.

    • @seven9766
      @seven9766 7 років тому

      The Sentence is : i^2=j^2=k^2=ijk=-1

  • @AndreaCalaon73
    @AndreaCalaon73 4 роки тому

    We want Geometric Algebra!

  • @micka6288
    @micka6288 8 років тому

    At 19:55 why is division NOT inverseDenominator*numerator in that order like matrix inverse

  • @zdspider6778
    @zdspider6778 5 місяців тому

    25:33 Shouldn't it be: _cos(theta/2), sin(theta/2) * v_ ? 🤔

  • @yb801
    @yb801 6 років тому

    4*4 matrix? Why ? Shouldn't it be 3*3 matrix?

  • @danwu7275
    @danwu7275 7 років тому

    why not its also unit quaternion Im I right?

    • @황성원-n3t
      @황성원-n3t 4 роки тому

      Dan WU its just the matter of which letter to chose to represent the rotation angle as a variable...

  • @rasitcakir9680
    @rasitcakir9680 4 роки тому

    Engineers!
    They get what they want.
    They don't care where they come from.

  • @ahbushnell1
    @ahbushnell1 6 років тому

    Link to notes?? Good video.

  • @shiqiai2881
    @shiqiai2881 8 років тому

    thank you!

  • @brendawilliams8062
    @brendawilliams8062 4 роки тому

    Thankyou

  • @streamapp
    @streamapp 9 років тому

    I believe this is a "dot product inverse", not a multiplicative inverse. Loosely saying inverse is a rather dangerous things when teaching students because they might not realize that you can't actually multiply two quaternions together due to dimensional mismatch.

    • @dlwatib
      @dlwatib 9 років тому

      +David Jackson Except that you *can* multiply two quaternions together. That's kinda the whole point! View the video again. You use both the dot product and also the cross product when multiplying.

    • @techeadache
      @techeadache 8 років тому

      +dlwatib +David Jackson
      After all that work, 19:20. The inverse (reciprocal) is wrong. V should be negative V. The reciprocal of a quaternion(q) is its conjugate(q*) divided by its norm squared(||q||^2). The conjugate(q*) is written as q* = (a, -V). The norm is referred to as the length in this video.
      So it turns out that everyone is wrong. Rejoice! Except dlwatib. He is still right. This professor has trouble with negative signs. But it is the concept that matters. Too bad no one understands the concept. 150 years later, Sir Hamilton is still owning us.

    • @Math_oma
      @Math_oma 8 років тому

      +d jax
      What is a "dot product inverse"?
      It is a fact that all nonzero quaternions, that is, the quaternion (0,0,0,0), have an inverse. Furthermore, any two quaternions can be multiplied together, there is never "dimensional mismatch".

  • @TenHanger
    @TenHanger 9 років тому +1

    William Rowan Hamilton

  • @davidplanet3919
    @davidplanet3919 9 днів тому

    Heisenberg?

  • @McTofuwuerfel
    @McTofuwuerfel 7 років тому +1

    Even he said Heisenberg, I am certain it was Hamilton.

  • @ww8720
    @ww8720 3 роки тому

    For q=q1×q2, how do I get q1 when I already know q and q2??

    • @edgarbonet1
      @edgarbonet1 Рік тому

      If q = q₁q₂, then
      q₁ = q₁q₂q₂⁻¹ = qq₂⁻¹

  • @TheLeontheking
    @TheLeontheking 5 років тому

    If i^2 = - 1, and j^2 = - 1, why should i*j not be - 1 as well?

    • @APaleDot
      @APaleDot Рік тому

      Because then i = j and you just have standard complex numbers.

  • @harandianr
    @harandianr Рік тому

    A little algebra would have made things simpler and cleaner.q=a+bi+cj+dk, Hamiltonian numbers are an extension of complex numbers. As person with mathematical background I found the lecture a bit confusing. In math you easily and cleanly show that Hamiltonian numbers form a number system but there is no commutation.Showing a=a+v part is the interesting part of this lecture. But I wish he had done it in a cleaner way mathematically. Wikipedia covers this but still I wish someone would post a lecture on rotation using Hamiltonian numbers in a detailed and clear way.
    But the way Hamilton wanted to make a number system in dimension 3 but it did not work. Mathematically , there are number systems of dime nation 1,2 ,4 and 8 and that is all, nothing beyond 8. Dimension 8 numbers are called Cayley
    With Cayley numbers you do not have a(bc) equal to (ab)c
    numbers. It took decades before Hamiltonian found their way into application . Let us hope that Cayley find their way in years rather than decades.

  • @guilhermeartigueirohenriqu2011
    @guilhermeartigueirohenriqu2011 6 років тому

    A Profundidade necessitante

  • @Pengochan
    @Pengochan 8 років тому

    nobody noticing that the inverse is missing a minus sign: students sleeping soundly.

  • @projectgg9715
    @projectgg9715 8 років тому +1

    "What is a quaternion?", the first question to answer before anything else.
    Quaternion = rotation(s); //any rotation or combination of rotations possible.
    //conversion relations: (can only convert in one direction)
    euler_rotation(s) → quaternion → matrix;
    euler_rotation(s) → matrix;
    //usage: (what does it mean)
    q1 x q2 = q3; //cross multiply means apply/accumulate the rotations;
    q x q⁻¹ = identity; //q cross multiply it's inverse cancels out and gives (0,0,0,1) in xyzw notation; (rotation "undo" capability)
    q(x,y,z,w)⁻¹ = q(-x,-y,-z,w); //the inverse of a quaternion is simply negating xyz; (no need to find matrix determinant)
    q x vec3 x q⁻¹ = vec3 rotated by q; //you can directly rotate a point/vector without the matrix form; (vec3 must be expanded to vec4 with 4th element = 1 for quaternion cross multiply) *Edit fixed*
    I prefer Z-up and (x,y,z,w) notation instead of (a, (i,j,k)); (although I can understand how it was derived from the equations)
    //Note: (discrepancies)
    I could not verify that q(x,y,z,w)⁻¹ = q(x,y,z,-w) using openGL. (the professor says negate w for inverse quaternion)
    I could not verify that incrementing 'w' rotates around any sort of arbitrary axis. (incrementing by 0.1 in range of (-1,1))
    (many descriptions/diagrams say/show that w rotates around the arbitrary axis that the x,y,z components supposedly represents; this does not appear to be the case)

  • @brendawilliams8062
    @brendawilliams8062 4 роки тому

    It’s turning too