I really appreciate this video as a Pashtun-Tajik from Afghanistan. I always wanted to know the history and culture of the iranic peoples. Nowadays we think we’re pretty distinct and isolated from each other but when we learn history, we realise that we’re more connect than we thought.
Shut it bro, your ancestors were fked by Turks, that’s why you Tajiks look Turkic. We Pashtuns have nothing to do with Iranic and don’t care about it. Should I write this comment in Russian to you😂😂😂😂@@ҶамшедНуров
Don't Forget the Alan, Sarmatians, Saka, etc! These are important Iranic nomadic horsemen who spread as far west as Ukraine and Hungary and as far east as Mongolia.
@@caniceedward Cause as an Indian I can definitely say with genetic evidence that Aryans(North Indians and Iranians) were lighter skinned than their counterparts and definitely had no black ancestry. The scythians were described unanimously by Chinese and the Greeks as pale skinned red haired and green eyed.
I am an Iranian Kurd and an Iranian Azeri and a Yazidi Kurd and I also wish all our 400 million Aryan/Iranic/Iranian people of all The Median - Achaemenid Empire/The Persian Empire could become one country! I only only wish!
Various things unite people like common language, ethnicity, marriage and blood lines, common enemy or common advantages. Before a unification can happen even in form of a federation of very close countries like how Europe is today though, foreign invasive and dividing influence in forms of ideology and religion must lose its power. Fighting this influence could well be another uniting factor. As you can imagine, when it comes to big powers like Russia and China, subjugating smaller countries and taking advantage of them is a lot easier than dealing with a big powerful country or a federation and they wouldn't want to see any unification happen.
Wonderful video. Iranian Peoples have always fascinated me with the sheer vastness of physical and cultural space they inhabit. Also hoping to see some more Middle East content soon, maybe Levant?
Thanks dadash, for your your highly detailed research, examining our culture, and other cultures as well. Your videos are great, continue them please, there is vast content in regards of topics, but always do us in between, because our heritage is so complex, and incredibly hard to understand, because of its intricacy. Love to you my brother, I adore my people.
I have kurdish origins and I did a dna test and according to the test I am related to all of these ancient civilizations like sintashta, bactria margiana, manneans and even zagrosian neolithic farmers and even more…İt is incredible to know your ancestors who lived thousands of years ago.
I am an Iranian Kurd myself and I am also an Iranian Azeri and then I am also a Yazidi/Ezidi Kurd and I say we Kurds and we Azeris and we Yazidi Kurds are all Aryan/Iranic/Iranian/Indo - Iranian Peoples and I wish we could unite all our 400 million Aryan/Iranic/Iranian Peoples into one country called The Median - Achaemenid Empire! I only only wish!
@@kurdekibedin1347there are 3 big ethnic groups that defrent from iranic people 1moguls/central asian peolpe 2indian people/south asian peolpe 3 arabic people/midle eastens like saudi There is no more dna division and deference between a Kurdish and a baluchi all are iranic believe our wont its not change anything. come back to your root
The Alans/Ossetians and the Wakhis and the Sogdians are also iranic. The language of ossetians is ' Irōn' or Aryan. In the North there are the Lithuanians and Latvians. A clip on UA-cam shows a Lithuanian who understands Sanskrit spoken by an Indian lady who in turn understands Lithuanian. It is known that Avestan is very close to Sanskrit. The Aryan/Iranic languages are from the Satem branch of indo-european languages. Germanic languages, Latin and Greek are from the Kentum W branch. Red ware pottery for the E branch, gray corded ware pottery for the W branch. Tree of life myth for the W branch, Cosmic Egg myth for E branch. So the Two branches differ quite a bit☆
@OKay-ox3kh may be true about the looks of Lithianians but the German theory obviously was for reference to the Germanic people, Germans & Scandinavians. However, I m still saying that the Aryans are the same as the Iranics, the two words refer to the same group. That s why I showed that Ossetians give the name irōn to their language! Please see again my comment. In Cucuteni in E Romania in Moldavia there are ceramics with swastikas on them. I am still curious to see this Aryan symbol on Pottery from Germany or Scandinavia. Not just this but there are Sanskrit words in Romanian whose vocabulary is mostly based on Latin[ Roman conquest of Dacia at 106 AD]. Furthermore, the Aryans to the E and W of the Caspian were Vedic[F.Staal--Discovering the Vedas].
@OKay-ox3kh The Aryan theory in Germany predates WW2...by quite a bit. Max Müller is well known for his translation of the Vedas, the laws of Manu and the first Sanskrit lexicon in Europe. Did Müller study Lithuanian? If he did, Lithuanian is from the satem E branch while German is from the kentum W branch...I think he saw the differences very well being a good linguist.
@@OKay-ox3kh bro, this dude made some serious mistakes. for one, i am 1/2 scythian 1/2 alans and so are all the natives of tehran. our race has nothing to do with rest of iran nor germany. we are natural light skin people that you occasionally see in tehran or 1/20th of the tehran population as others moved in
If I understand this correctly the Iranian people have the same ancestry as the Europeans. The Yamnaya culture also came to Western Europe… My ex husband is Iranian. He is very proud on his ancestry. Accidentally to him Iranians are Arians. I once made the mistake of calling him an Arab. He was so offended. It seems that Iranians don’t like Arabs that much and certainly don’t want to be mistaken for one. Iran is a beautiful country with enormous generous people. They have a very old and beautiful culture. Sadly enough the ayatollah’s make life miserable for the people.
Arabs and Indo-Iranians are Muslims, but Indo-Iranians and Arabs are not as related as some would expect. The Arabs have greater ancestry from peoples of the Levant and have little or no European ancestry, however the Indo-Iranians do have an Indo-European genetic load and Iranian hunter-gatherers, the Indo-European ancestry varies from 10% to 35% depending on the ethnicity.
@@eltecnico9541Why would anyone even think that Indo-Iranians (Aryans) and Semitic Arabs are related?! They have completely different histories. I also dont think that Koreans, Ethipians and Italians are related just because these groups are christians lol
Good stuff! The Scythians! The Yue Zhi, the original inhabitants of northern China were Indo Iranan speakers! Tocarians! Strangely western indo european speaking gingers! Cousins all
I'm Egyptian and I'd love to watch and understand more about the Egyptians and how they've evolved into how they look and the culture they have adopted today in comparison to how they were in ancient times.
Salam my true brothers and sisters, Iran will one day be free from the oppressive regime. Your people will not be subject to western depravity, but one day you will be free in your culture and have your home back. Moafagh bashid!
Nope, the original Iranics looked like Iranics look today. Ancient DNA and skeleton samples of Iranians from past and presence literally confirm that their race has been kept pure and free from foreign admixture. Obsess less over Iranians/Aryans and get a life.
@@Yilkanzhi_Nooristani yes but a genetic continuity since Iron & bronze age, who are your ancestors *Dravidians* or *Aryans* from Central Asia?? "Overall, we demonstrate here a remarkable example of genetic continuity since the Iron Age in Indo-Iranian populations from Central Asia despite the frenzy of population migrations in the area since the Bronze Age. Similar to Zhabagin et al. work65, the present study shows no impact of the Arab cultural expansion in Central Asia on the Indo-Iranian speaker’s genetic diversity, 𝗱𝗲𝘀𝗽𝗶𝘁𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗼 𝗮 𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗳𝘁 𝗶𝗻 𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗴𝘂𝗮𝗴𝗲 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗧𝗮𝗷𝗶𝗸𝘀. 𝗪𝗲 𝗮𝗹𝘀𝗼 𝗱𝗼 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘀𝗲𝗲 𝗮 𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗲 𝗳𝗹𝗼𝘄 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗜𝗿𝗮𝗻 𝗱𝗲𝘀𝗽𝗶𝘁𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗣𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗶𝗮𝗻 𝗰𝘂𝗹𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘄𝗵𝗶𝗰𝗵 𝗹𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝗮 𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗴𝘂𝗮𝗴𝗲 𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗳𝘁 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗮𝗻 𝗲𝗮𝘀𝘁-𝗜𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗶𝗮𝗻 𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗴𝘂𝗮𝗴𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗮 𝘄𝗲𝘀𝘁-𝗜𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗶𝗮𝗻 𝗶𝗻 𝗧𝗮𝗷𝗶𝗸𝘀-𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝗬𝗮𝗴𝗵𝗻𝗼𝗯𝗶𝘀 𝗸𝗲𝗽𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝗲𝗮𝘀𝘁-𝗜𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗶𝗮𝗻 𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗴𝘂𝗮𝗴𝗲" Source: Guarino-Vignon, P., Marchi, N., Bendezu-Sarmiento, J. et al. Genetic continuity of Indo-Iranian speakers since the Iron Age in southern Central Asia. Sci Rep 12, 733 (2022).
Please make a video about the DNA of the Palestinians, and if possible also make a video about the Lebanese and especially the Saudi Arabs and current Jews from Israel. Would the current Jews be mixed with Europeans? gratitude
Modern European Jews are genetically half Middle Eastern jewish and half European, mainly Greek, Italian related, as well as some German and Eastern European ancestry. The Lebanese are the descendants of the ancient Canaanites, and have 90 to 92 percent of their ancestry, and some 8 to 10 percent arab, sub Saharan African and some Greek ancestry
I had my DNA result it shows the map of Medes Empire 😁 which is accurate but without mentioning that I am a Kurd. I guess most DNA labs missing the point that political borders do not represent DNA results or ethnicity.. they either label us Kurds “Iranian/Persia” or “Anatolian” or “Caucasus” but all false and failing to find the right ethnic group. We have a group of Kurdish friends and all did the test and all identical.
Diaco the Great was the king of the Medes who founded Iran. How do you think Kurds are not Iranian? The map of today's Iran is a large part of the map of the Median Empire😂😑
@@texmexexpressMedes are an ancient iranic ethnicity. Medes are not Kurds but Kurds are descendants of Medes and Parthians. According to a lot of linguists,Medes and Parthians are considered ancestor of all north western iranic peoples.
Great video. I really like your videos. This is how studying genetics and linguistics help better understand the history. Can you please do a video on the genetics of Kalash and burusho people. Both are quite unique populations in south central asia.
Awesome, video! What technology did the Elamites bring to the Achaemenid empire that allowed it to expand quickly? I really can not tell from the texts that I have studied. I asked ChatGPT that question and all I received was this: " It's important to note that the Achaemenid Empire was a vast and diverse empire that incorporated various regions and cultures, but the core Persian elements were responsible for the technological and administrative innovations that characterized the empire."
Quite a lot of stuff, from their writing system to their architecture, but probably the most important influence of the Elamite on Persians was the transfer of their tradition of excellent administration something that was very influential on the development of the first Persian empire (The Elamite World - Javier Alvarez-Mon - Page 481) Elamites were very good administrators and although we have not yet been able to completely decipher the linear Elamlite language we know that the word "Dabeer" (دبیر) which in Persian means scribe and administrator is actually an Elamite word only indicating they might have continued living along Persians as some sort of bureaucratic class for a few centuries afterwards (The decipherment of Linear Elamite writing - Francois Desset - A Lecture at Cambridge University ) We know that their language was still being used at least for 1200 years after the beginning of the first Persian empire. They didn't disappear they were simply assimilated into the Persian world and with them so did their language, culture and traditions.
Pashtoon are central asian Peoples.their haplo group is R1a.the same as the eastren european like ukrain.russian.the adapt the iranian language group pashto.iranian are j2 haplo group.the where some time part of the iranian empire.or some time free khanat.they have always problems with the persians empire. Bactria was their land..but all pashtoon are not with the same dna.some are khushan.some are Huns.the have also some mixing with the indus valey civi lization.the balochi are south iranian. Balochistan was always part of the persians empire. Their language is iranian. They are 100%east iranian.they give a great contribut to the war against the roman empire. They fight many wars against the roman empire.
Consider the Zend Avesta the Story of Yama the Bright or Yama Ksaeta or Jamshed. He dwelled in the Far North where the Sun rose up and set down once in a year. He was told by the gods about a great cold and he built a mote to protect people and animals. This is Not a myth. An Aryan Cemetery exists in the middle of the finno ugric population Mariel east of Moscow. There are 45 wooden posts marking the Graves just like you can see in Cemetery in the Sands, a UA-cam clip.
And also .... French linguist Pinault pointed out, by comparing Tokharian and Indo-Aryan languages, that there were elamite influences in both sides. The Oxus Civilization is thought to be the place from where they came.
The Aryans were northern Scythian nomads who migrated south from around the Caspian Sea 4,000-3,500 years ago. Their parentage is Cro-Magnon Mongolian YDNA-C, which became the base race of Europe. The sibling is YDNA-Q, the main Native American people who passed through the Arctic Ocean coast to the Americas, and YDNA-R and Q lived in close proximity.
Loooool Haplogroup c predates Mongolians and Mongolians them self are mixed their mtDNA is mostly east Eurasian but their y dna is west and north Eurasian Haplogroup c is found in old Caucsiod people the oldest is as well even jomon were Haplogroup c and are Caucsiod looking Mongolians are mixed like the aniu
@@famitsus987 YDNA extracted from a European Cro-Magnon bone. 30,000 years ago is YDNA-C. YDNA-C and YDNA-N are 20,000 years old. Wasn't it? Jomon people are YDNA-D and southbound. Some YDNA-C was also associated with the Jomon people, or it has been traced.
@@Chairman_MaoZedong The Aryan YDNA-R did not arise suddenly. They are northern nomads who branched off from the Cro-Magnon Mongols. That is, they are subordinate to the Mongolian gene tree.
The way Persians seized power from Medes /Kurds happened by a palace coup. Cyrus was son in law of Kurdish King and Cyrus claimed throne via Kurdish King Astyages’ daughter and civil war broke out. Some Kurdish generals sided on Cyrus and removed Astyages from power. That’s how the first Persian Kingdom founded on the lands of Medes and inheriting their administration, religion, laws and army.
Medes were not kurds..that's such a crazy claim(medes that rulled before cyrus the great weren't even nomads, the first time the word kurd ever was mentioned in history was by sasanid persian king refering to a nomad iranian)..medes(mad) were an ancient iranian people, alogside persians(pars) and parthians(part). All iranians today are a mix of these ancient groups, many other iranians decsend from ancient medes not just kurds! And cyrus the great wasn't the grandson of medes, he was half median himself. He was the uniter of medes and persians. You can clearly see that in persepolis engravings,showing persian and medes hand in hand, made by his son in law(darius the great) and grandchildren(xerxes).
i consider the leks, the lurs, the kurds & the gilaks all four as the descendants of the medes + there is an update with some newly made proofs that make a fifth ethnicy/people as descendants of the medes also exactly said the sigynian subbranch of the medes these are the carpathian hutsul/ghucul people of bordering north-romania/southwest-ukraine made them being genetically in first case a mixture of geto-dacians+slavs but from their origin(the old substrat) a iranic median sigynnian people (that mean to a lesser degrees median than geto-dacian or slavic but anyway enough genetically and lexicaly median percentage to be considered as a people of iranic/median origin), the first proofs for that are antique historians herodotus, strabo & apollonios, they wrote about the median tribe the siginians how it's written they travelled from media and settled maybe some 100-200 years ago before herodotus time in west-romania or northwest-romania (and surrounding areas to the west and north but generally you can say a lot of them lived in that time especially in the tysa river & mares river areas) and herodotus the historians lived around 450 BC so there were two options when the date were when that median sigynian tribe left their homeland and moved via armenia/turkey to transilvania, the first is around 640 BC (the following years after phraortes death when the things get Bad for 28 years for the median kingdom because the assyrian-skythian mixed king made phraortes' son kyaxares for this time to a vassal in his own kingdom) or in the time around 540 BC (when the median kingdom collapsed and the persians took over) however it is said that the sigynnes wear median clothing and had many median customs and the sigynnians themselve said (to herodotus) that their were median colonists or descendants of the medes while the historican strabo (who lived 63BC-23AD) wrote about siginians who lived near the south caspian sea (southwest caspia region like gilan & mazandaran & azerbaijani north talysh mountains until the beginning of tabaristan that means the areas where today gilaks, mazandaranis, talishs live) these siginns were the ones who stayed in media and didn't leave like herodot's sigynnes. strabo said about these siginians that in general they practise persians customs and he mentioned like herodot their small horses race which were shaggy long haired flat-nosed/short-snooted ponies that pulled a chariot or cart in a four-horse-team also often driven by women, maybe that small horse race is related to the north-romania carpathian hutuli-horses/ponies. so where ist the connection of the median subbranch of the sigynes (apollonios wrote them also as sigunns with u) and the luri people? you see it in the name of the shughani dialect speakers lurs. somewhere i also read that sigynians where described as living alongside with an unknown gaulaki tribe (possibly the gilaks are meant to be them but the source of that statement looks not so proven possibly it was only an internetbased false info not sure about that). but something to the kurds, i noticed in strabos' time there were mentioned a gouranii tribe living alongside with medes (atropatanian medes?) so it looks like 2000 years ago the subbranch of ghorani-speakers of proto-kurds already existed (in northwest iran) and to the west in the same time not far away from iran in the bordering southwest turkey lived the karduchi people who were also proto-kurds, by the way a town in the antique time in turkey was called sigynos. but i want go back to the topic with proofs that the proto-ghuculs of the carpathian mountains were in fact of iranic median sigynian origin, the ethnicon itself for example has 3 theories of it's meaning and etymoligical roots (until today nobody could say or proof what the ethnonym hucul really means) the 3 theories what IT means are all iranic median = luri/leki/kurd/gilaki cognates: 1. it comes from the gilaki word for "mountain"="qukh"(but in a median dialectical way is more possible cuz there was in earlier times a between-sound of the letter k & g (like kg) so like gkukh' that leads to ghukh'+ul/ol(adjective ending) so the proto-huculian(sigynian-orientated) word/ethnonym would mean "the people from the mountains/mountainous people"(meant are sure the carpathian mountains rather than elburz or talishs mountains in my opinion)=ghukh'uls=ghuc'uls. 2. gilaki word "houz" for "lake" so hutsuls would mean " people who live by the lake" (speculative said maybe it could be the caspian who counts as the biggest lake of the word or maybe the east-part of urmia lake or just one of the smaller lakes in the carpathian mountains but it just one of the possibilities) 3. gilaki word "ghut" for "immersion" that would mean ghutsuls mean "(water)diver)/aquanaut". that leads to another interessting exclusive huculian word (that is not to be found in ucrainian language) that word has also etymological ties to median(luri/kurd/laki/gilaki) cause it sounds related to these two gilaki words by meaning "hooz"(lake/pond) & "ghuth"(immersion/diving) that huculian word is "ghuk" and means "waterfall" so connected with watermasses/lake/diving somehow. another interessting exclusive huculian word (not found in ukrainian language) is "kootüga" and means "dog" while in the luri language "katu" is "dog" these words are really close and belong to median dialects in origin, besides that word for dog, in the luri and in the median language there is a second word for dog it's median "spak" but if you think again about the dialectical typicalness of earlier times with the k/g between-sound you can say "sphagk" shows you the dialectical changing in the luri word "sag"(also meaning dog) where the p was fallen away but still you can consider it as of median origin. a huculian word (not in ukrainian language again) for "farm-animals/domestic-animals/livestock-animals" is "marga" what you can compare to the luri & gilaki word "morgen" for "chicken/hen/rooster" what sure is etymologicaly related with the hutsulian marga. one last word is huculian "bardka" for "axe" while inuri language "bard" means "stone" it got in my opinion prehistoric roots in the time where it was not everywhere common to use weapons made of copper and bronze but also from stone but anyway i think etymologicaly the word "bronce" is also connected with "bard". the last thing i wanna say about the sigynians what herodot thought about what their ethnonym could be he used to detonate the name with "spear" or in the othe other side with "traders"(or "hucksters") but he just speculated and didn't know for sure.
Wonderful 😍 thanks so much 🙏 but way only 4 minutes for this wide subject you have the knowledge and facility ??? Carry on good work good luck best wishes sirus London
Ancestralbrew is a hidden gem on the web. You deserve so many more followers bro!! As a super tolerant Persian, I know where I get it from. Rest in peace to the best king the world ever knew. The tolerant and powerful, Cyrus the great
Although you did already cover the Indians I have a request desired for my own separate Bengali ethnicity. the request is therefore making another discrete video on the indian video's later mentioned southeast asian and tibetan mixture into the south asians focusing on the rather ignored eastern ethnicity of Densely Populated Bengalis formed from further diverging of previously mentioned groups.
Thank you for this very accurate information about the origins of Iranic people. I watch many of your videos and I have learned a great deal about different nations origins. Would you please tell us about Croatians DNA as well? That you again!
@@matrixxx3662 Indians/Pakistanis look black buddy kalash would pass as average Afghan in Afghanistan and stand out in India and Pakistan also many Kalash and Nuristani look straight Indian. The Afghans that pass as Indian are from NE Afghanistan like Jalalabad and Nagrahar province they are heavily Dardic admixed Lmao
@@Kazim28 no you are wrong nearest people to Iranians are Khandari Pashtuns and Heratis. Pashtuns from Pakistan are nearest to South Asians cause they are mixed with them not Afghan Pashtuns. Tajiks in Afghanistan have a lot of East Eurasian admixture and South Asian Hunter gatherer ancestry Pashtuns have around the same south Asian admixture and almost no East Eurasian admixture. Iranians also have no East Eurasian admixture.
Your presentation has one BIG FLAW. That is the Iranian tribes that came to the Iranian platue since 7000 years ago in sporadic migrations and drastically increased around 4000 years ago where from north central Asia and have ZERO connections to the fake imaginary Yamnaya tribe of west of Caspian sea! The 3 major Iranian tribes the migrated into the Iranian platue some 4000 years ago were: Persians, Medes, and Parthians all of whom were of same Pre European race with black or brown hair, brown eyes, with somewhat olive skin color and morphologically tall and slender. They looked the same as modern Persians and had nothing to do with present looking Europeans who have genetically mutated since the bronz age from the Indo Iranian looks to the pale white skin of today. PEACE.
متاسفانه دولتهای استعماری ، این دروغ را مدام میگویند که ایرانیان چهار هزار سال پیش از شمال روسیه وارد ایران شدند ، این نظریه یک دانشمند روس بود که هفتاد سال قبل این نظریه رد شد ، اکنون با آمدن علم زنتیک ثابت شده آریایی واقعی مردمان غرب ایران در کوهای ژاگرس هستند این را دانشمندان دانمارکی موسوم به گروه کپنهاک اثبات کردند ، در سال دوهزار و هفده . دانشمندان در بیست سال قبل با بررسی استخوان های ایلامیان باستان دریافتند که بیش از هفتاد درصد ژن ایلامیان دربیشتر از هفت هزارسال قبل با مردم امروز ایران مطابقت دارد. دانشمندان نیوزیلندی چند هفته قبل ثابت کردن زبان انگلیسی در هشت هزارسال قبل به غرب ایران و کوههای زاگرس برمیگردد. اگر آزمایش ژنتیک ایرانیان را در یوتوب دنبال کنی ایرانیان خالص ترین ژن ها رو دارند . من بخوام توضیح بدم شرحش بسیار مفصل هست ، اینگونه مطالب بیشتر در آکادمی ها بحث میشود، نه در مدارس و یا سطح جامعه ، چون قدرتهای جهانی از اینکه مردم ایران تاریخ بیش از دوازده هزارسال خود را بداند وحشت دارند ، چون ایران در طی هزاران سال همواره هژمون جهانی بوده است .
we have more in common with each other ➡️central Asian countries Afghanistan Kazakhstan Iran Uzbekistan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan And we should be proud to be united central Asian 🇦🇫 🇹🇯 🇹🇲 🇰🇬 🇺🇿 🇮🇷 🇰🇿 💪🏻🌟
I’m Pashtun and I always hear (past and present) of OTHERS always stating Pashtuns are “Eastern Iranic peoples”. I’ve never heard it in my family (including from the elders), from my own immediate tribal people, nor in the wider Pashtun community ever parroting this. Pashtuns themselves make a distinction of this, that they’re an independent group of people, not that: “we came from Eastern Iranic people”.
But you cannot deny reality. Your elders deny it because they feel it takes away from their heritage, but being Iranian, and being Iranic is two different things. You're Iranic peoples there is no doubt about it.
You can do the research for yourself, it's not hard, or you can watch ancestral brew, he does highly detailed research, but Tajiks are not just Iranic, but they are Persians, I'm jus bringing that as example. Pashtun is a Iranic people.
@@agostocobain2729 but that’s the point I’m making, YOU as a non Pashtun keep reiterating that Pashtuns are an “Iranic group of peoples”, Pashtuns themselves don’t go on about this. It’s nothing to do with my family personally, as I said I’ve never, as an example, interacted with a wide range of Pashtuns (say online or at a function) and we all suddenly concluded that were all Iranic peoples-it’s never stipulated by Pashtuns themselves. That’s all I was stating. Also, why stop at Iranic peoples, why not reference the Steppes? Or that Pashtuns are the descendants of the Andronovons? Or why stop there and not label us just descendants of indo Europeans? Anyway, we’re Pashtuns ✌️ and no, we don’t need to be forced fed “but…but you’re Iranic peoples”.
Basically a original Mediterannean people usually olive to light mocha or caramel in skin hues with straight, curly, wavy, and sometimes shaggy black colored hair and to a lesser extent very dark brown with eyes that are usually black, brown, and hazel descend from Anatolian Farmers as do original Greeks, Italians, Spanish, Portuguese, Arabs, Kurds, Jews, Hebrews, Assyrians, Akkadians, Arameans, Turks, Armenians, And Yazidis yeah.
Ah, I see you’re familiar with the basal population genetic groups! Nice! You are more or less correct, but I would say that Anatolian usually makes up about a ~33% of most Iranic DNA. The second ~33% is Zagrosian. The remainder is ~15% from the Caucasus Hunter-Gather populations, ~5-10% Natufian (Arabian peninsula), and the remainder is a small chunk of Western European Hunter-Gatherers (~5-10%), trace amounts of Turkic/Mongolian/East Asian (up to 5%). Ancient Ancestral Indian (up to 3%). The closest non-Iranic population groups to Iranic peoples are Caucasian or Mesopotamian groups, such as Assyrians, Armenians, Anatolian Turks, and some Iraqi Arab tribes as well. After that, it’s the modern Mediterranean groups such as the Lebanese, Syrians, Greeks, etc. who do share Mesopotamian ancestry and are descended from the ancient Anatolians more than any other group.
@@USASPORTSCARDSplease distinguish between modern day Iranians and Iranics people that are nearest to the original Andronova or Sintahsta culture are Afghans and Tajik and they have a balance of both European Hunter gatherer ancestry and Anatolian farmer ancestry while Persians and Kurds like other west Asians are heavily Zagros and Anatolian farmer shifted. Modern day Iranians are not Iranic very minimal only linguistically and some cultural values are Iranic ..
Yes, but there were people with light eyes in Anatolian Farmers. It is important to note the people in Iran with higher prevalence of light eyes are those with the smallest Yamnaya-Sintasha-Andronovo DNA. Such as the Mazandaranis, Gilaks and Lurs. There a lot of light eyes in Sardians as well.
@@persiansoundsAfg If we want to truly be precise than we have to decide on what we’re calling the original “Iranic” people. What timeline do we decide who is who? Because the “Proto-Iranians” most closely resemble modern day Iranians. However if we really want to roll it back all the way to the “Indo-Iranians”, then yes, Yaghnobis (closest), Pamiris, Tajiks, etc. are the closest modern day people groups we have among the descendants of the original Iranic tribes.
@@USASPORTSCARDS Iranic language, culture, ancestry derived from Eastern Europe. Yaz culture is where the mixing between Iranics and BMAC people happened. The Yaghnobis are nearest to Iranics and Yaz culture, single Persian from Shiraz single study is also near Yaz culture only atypical results likely of mixed ancestry of some sort or maybe even he’s part European. Regardless, Iranics labeled as proto Iranics are the actual Iranics and their ancestry is minimal in Iran only Khorosani eastern Iranians have decent amount of actual Iranic ancestry.
A lot of Iranians need to see this. They still look at Afghans as “Indians” or people that are not related to them at all. When literally, our land, once called Āryānā, is the ancestral homeland of the ancient Aryans and the modern day Iranic peoples.
Massagetai are Jats of South Asia who migrated into South Asia during the Rule of Darius the Great to invade Indus valley region. Persian empire employed many Sakas to invade the region
I am myself an Iranian Kurd and a Yazidi Kurd and I say we Kurds and we Yazidi Kurds are Aryan/Iranic/Iranian/Indo - Iranian Peoples and I wish we could unite all our 400 million Aryan/Iranic/Iranian Peoples into one country called The Median - Achaemenid Empire! I only only wish!
Your haplogroup my kurdy friend is R1a or J1 J2, you guys are not the native Assyrians, i personally like Persia, but Kurdistan is some wannabe ancient assyrian empire, its a pardoy of the Assyrian empire. Im seeing you guys online everywhere acting like your Assyrian when your not, your haplogroups are different and also when you do get the Assyrian R1B its because of rapes and forced conversions of the assyrians and taking Assyrian woman. dont flatter yourself brother, you are a nomadic mede or another iranic person. leave our history alone, stop plagiarising. First you take our land, than our music and clothing, than suppress our religion, take our woman and your people even want our entire history. you guys are nothing like Darius the mede and his peoples. i don't say this with hate or malice, but frustration.
@@bugsytv6852there is no such thing as "Assyrians" today. Everyone one who dealt with the history knows that you appropriated the name "assyrian" in the middle of the 19th century
@@calculator-sd5370 I agree with you but I still wish all our Aryan/Iranic/Iranian people would love/like to come back to Iran and I wish they would love to become one country with Iran! I only wish!
Not to get into a random flame war but I think that most modern scholars question if the Cyrus cylinder can be considered a precursor to modern notions of human rights
Leave Pakistan out of this because Balochistan is historically linked to Punjab and Sindh through Indus valley civilization. Most Iranians think of Baloch as foreign because of their medium brown skin color and clothing. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa is historically linked to Punjab through Gandharan Buddhist Civilization. Original inhabitants are Hindkowaan Pahari North Punjabis. There are absolutely no Zoroastrian relics or artifacts found anywhere in Pakistan however plenty of Buddhist and Hindu relics and artifacts found in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan which proves that Iranic people are not indigenous however migrated east to Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa in search of fertile agricultural lands close to rivers.
1)Peoples from balochistan are original iranian Peoples. Their language is iranian. And they have no thing to do with india. 2)the pashtoon Peoples are from central asia origine.the iranian haplo group is j2.the pashtoon are R1a.the same as the east european. How you conect the pashtoon with the karala Peoples. The kpk regione and balochistan were never part of india.the where always part of the persian empires. Or some time free khanat pashtoon are not a single race.some are indoeuropean some are hun.some are khushans shytians. But the are not indians.
@@hayatullahkhan476 Baloch and Pashtuns are migrants they are not indigenous as proved by history and most importantly archaeology the biggest proof of all as Buddhist Hindu Indus valley artifacts and relics found everywhere in Balochistan and kpk and no proof of Zoroastrianism in these provinces
@@muslim_first.pashtoons emigrates from Afghanistan.because their land is not fertile.many of them emigrate to india Punjab.sind.but the kpk region is part of Afghanistan.this region is part of the central asia.and it is consider as the caucasian inhabitants region. The indian continent start at attock brige or khoshal ghar brige. You can see the land changed.also the peoples changed. The language changed. 2)the balochi are not emigrate the are the original iranian Peoples.they are living their from about 7000 years. They fought the battle of carreh against the roman empire. This was the worst defeat for the romans history. Then with the sasanian empire the battle of edessa. Crasso was captur in the 1st battle. Valeriano was captur in the 2nd battle. They were the roman kings..
@@hayatullahkhan476 People here who are arguing about skin colour, probably don't know any real history and arguing needlessly. it's all much ado about nothing. Environmental factors played a huge role in skin colour determination. High UVR (ultra violet radiation) has led to dark skin colour and low production of UVR led to light skin. By natural selection genes responded to environmental conditions for a human to survive in his own environment. So arguing about skin colour is a moot point, which is not relevant in a historical setting.
Please make video about Hazara people! ❤ I'm a Hazara from central Afghanistan, My heritage DNA has 50% China and Mongolia Kazakhstan! 10 % Korea 25 % central Asia (Afghanistan) 5% Iran 5% north India 5% Balkan
Amazing work. I was just reading this. The Elamites (Persians) had civilization in 8000 bc & they invented money (exchange tokens) before the "sumerian"(jewish) indo-europeans did.
Elamites were not Iranians. They were a Mesopotamian people with the y haploid group j2, l, and are relayed to the Babylonians, sumerians, Akkadians, Assyrians of Iraq
@@Paul_Geriat اتفاقا ایلامی ها ایرانی هستند، بیست سال پیش دانشمندان بقایای استخوانهای ایلامی را برسی کردن و متوجه شدن از نظر ژنتیکی بیش از هفتادو پنج درصد مطابق مردم امروز ایران هستند ، رر ظمن مردم میان رودان مدام تحت مهاجرت ایرانیان بودنند
Cyrus’ culturally diversity is why we’re so separate now. It’s closer to the Roman Empire in style. He should have forced us to all be the same so our lands wouldn’t be stripped away look at us now
@@delaramsalmassi4063 Hahaha that's funny but thanks and remember we were one country under Persian Empires and Alexander and Persian Satrap Mithridates created a PersoGreek Empire in Pontos
Fun fact, the first instance of the word messiah in the Torah is in reference to Cyrus the Great. The word messiah means savior, and it was because he was a king who saved the Judahites from Babylonian occupation and allowed them to practice their religion once again with restoring the Holy Temple. Cyrus is celebrated in the Jewish religion for his religious tolerance.
Pashtuns and Balochs are mixed group of Iranic and Indic, specially balochs who have so much of indic origin people. Who identify as balochs today. Infact many of them today speak their Sindhic languages, which are all indic, like jadgali, khetrani, jaffarki etc, they speak balochi as second.
🤣🤣🤣 there is no iranian languages. You are talking about persian languages.there is no iranian languages. You are talking about persian language. In iran there are about 40 million Azerbaijani -Turkic people and they speak in turkish
You could mention the disaster that was the willing of the Achaemenids to invade Greece. Couldn't you ? The disastrous result was the massive intrusion of Alexander the Greek and his allies, who (instead of destroying Rome, which would have been a much better idea) broke that persian empire. It made a terrible mess. The greek-bactrians separated. They were invaded by Tokharians (Yuezhi in Chinese). All these wars, followed later by wars between the byzantine empire and the sassanid (2d persian) empire, had the result that we can see : Tamerlan, that turcomongolian "sword of god" is now celebrated in Samarcanda, ancient capital of Sogdiana. Only in Tadjikistan there keep being descendents of Andronovians.
sarrr we are sanatani lindu sarrrrr we are aryan sarrrrrr we are more white than Iranians, afghans and pakistanis sarrrrrrr believe me sarrrrrrrr We follow vedas sarrrrrr....
Sarrrrr Sarrrrrrr we Pakistanis are Aryans not like lindu Sarrrrrrr are ancestors where Vedic Aryans Sarrrrr not like present lindus Sarrrrr and we didn't do idol worshiping Sarrrrr of different lindis gods Sarrrrr.
Genetically Indians are more IVC related then Pakistanis that because they can be less steppe and Neolithic Iranian and AASI mix more, but Pakistanis are South Asian and steppe mixed mutts and still brown as Indians what are you even talking about.
The chronology indicates that the Oxus Civilization died when was born the Indo-Aryan nation (Rig Veda appeared a short time later). And also, at the same time showed up in Anatolia the Mittani Kingdom, ruled by Indo-Aryans. + There's little evidence of BMAC genome in NW India = The shock with Andronovians was deadly for that civilization, HOWEVER there were survivors who mixed with the invadors, AND the main result was the Indo-Aryan people (who fled as kept coming Andronovian invaders). It's the time when the Aryan concept ("we are civilized ... so, so civilized ... and we conquer whatever we want") was born, impacting also the Andronovians who became then Iranians .... except some who stood completely wild like the Alans, but they are also named Iranians.
You people are idiots who dont know anything except western cooked up stories! YOU PEOPLE DONT STUDY ALSO MODERN DETAILS AND ARCHEOLOGY BESIDES! Very elaborate details are exist in ancient Sanskrit texts that forefathers of Iranians moved out from ancient India! There are called Asuras and this happened after Dasarajna or ten kings war as per Rigveda!
Originating in the Pontic steppe huh? Next you’ll be saying that they were the original Indians of India… naw, the Aryan migration theory was debunked ages ago, look up Dr. David Frawley on the Aryan migration theory and you’ll know who immigrated where lol
One question that I am burning to get a reliable answer is: what is the origin and genetic make up of Xinjiang mummies of West China. One of those mummies looks so much like my late mother who was of Kurdish origin of West Iran. Everybody wants to claim the mummies of Xinjiang , of course on youtube. Thanks millions for your awesome clips. ... California.
There is no evidence of Indo-Iranian Groups originating in Eastern Europe. It's an outdated racist colonial propaganda which Europeans used to prove their supiriority. Linguistic and genetic analysis have shown that Indo-Europeans originated in the area that is stretched between Eastern Iran, Modern day Pakistan and Western India along the rivers Indus and river Saraswati. Modern-Europeans migrated outward from this area and intermingled with the natives. There is genetic evidence suggesting this, there is archeological evidence of civilizations as old as 10,000 years old with a cultural continuity in both Iran and India. There is literary evidence of tribes like Yavanas (modern fay Greeks) migrating out of this area.
Bro, there is no Caucasian origin groups in India before 3500 to 4000 years ago. Same with Iran. There was no r1a haploid groups found in remains across all of India as there was only Indus Valley people, who were Mesopotamian related j2 and l in origin. The r1a haploid group started in Iran around 4000 plus years ago, and in India around 3500 and 4000 years at the oldest. The ones that came to India were the sintastha people. Iran had androvono and some yamnaya ancestry. They also had Caucasian hunter gatherer ancestry, which is seen in Central Asia, and lacking among most Indians, except some north West Indian groups
@@jancyvargheese5351 North West Indians look like Indians what do Indians look like with out punjab because I am quite sure many will Indians them selves wouldn't agree with what your saying here. I cant see much of a difference between Indians and Pakistanis apart from few exceptions and no North West Indians dont have any CHG.
the iranic people of eurocentric features mostly migrate to east, the whites iranics people are majority in east thats why there is sooo many pictures of afghans with very eurocentric features, paksitan too if you search deeper, the average iranics is more and less like ancestralbrew owner
Iranic people have no "eurocentric" features. These features are Iranic. All of the Iranics feautured in this video where from the Western side of Greater Iran. Afghan/Pakistani Iranics are on average not white.
yea i began to believe that all muslim countries seems like always depicted as heavily eurocentric by google maps, what is the meaning of this shit?!@@mr.purple1779
What Should Israel Do Next in Light of Their Declaration of War? First, we should reflect deeply upon the painful divide that has festered among us, causing the devastating toll of hundreds of lives lost and thousands wounded. We need to yearn for a major change and wholeheartedly unite as one. Only the bonds of unity can shield us from future tragedy and elevate our nation from the abyss of despair. We cannot afford to nurse bitterness or delay action, waiting for the war's end to ponder our fractured state. Now is the time for introspection. We need to pinpoint the reasons behind our present circumstances and act accordingly. Our quest for understanding needs to extend to our lives’ very source: the upper force of love, bestowal and connection that acts on us beyond our current level of awareness, which perceives through an egoistic and divisive lens. It is no matter of religion, but a realization that reality’s governing force is singular, and we accordingly need to stand united before it as one. Precisely in our trying times, we are in need for an expansion of consciousness to let the upper force of love and bestowal into our lives. We need to raise the pain and anguish that erupts in so many people in such times to the upper force, and wish for it to mend our torn relations, and draw us closer together. We must seek to hold each other close to our hearts, not solely in times of war, but as an enduring duty. We are a nation established not on a biological foundation, but on a spiritual-ideological one: "Love your neighbor as yourself." That is, we were people from all around ancient Babylon who felt a problem with living our lives solely according to competitive-materialistic ideals and sought for a higher truth to our existence, which we revealed as a higher force of love, bestowal and connection that united us above our divisive drives. That is why we cannot remain divided without suffering from our separation. Our mission to unite above our divisions is constant, because divisive egoistic desires constantly surface within us, driving us apart. Therefore, much like a diligent student who finds new homework awaiting them each day, we should not accumulate any more overdue assignments that end up exploding in our faces, pressuring us into critical situations such as the one we now find before us. Instead, we should hurry up and correct our hearts to favor unity “as one man with one heart” above our divisions.
Persians used to deposit their Greek prisoners out there, in their (then) farthest reaches of their empire. That's why they have some northern Mediterranean features like blue or grey eyes.
@@Yasa5na You are not well educated. Alpine areas down to Greece have an abundance of blue-eyed people. Alexander the Great was described by Greek historian Arrian as having "one eye dark as the night and one blue as the sky". Northern Italians today have many blue-eyed people.
@@Yasa5na iranics are brown people completely different phenotype in face and body than europeans u will never be closely related to europeans you are mostly south asian looking
As an afghan pashtun I really appreciate taking time to explain the history of the Iranian plateau and the various groups within it.
*Afghan plateau
I really appreciate this video as a Pashtun-Tajik from Afghanistan. I always wanted to know the history and culture of the iranic peoples. Nowadays we think we’re pretty distinct and isolated from each other but when we learn history, we realise that we’re more connect than we thought.
Tajiks don't marry pashkunis. Don't invent fake stories
Shut it bro, your ancestors were fked by Turks, that’s why you Tajiks look Turkic. We Pashtuns have nothing to do with Iranic and don’t care about it. Should I write this comment in Russian to you😂😂😂😂@@ҶамшедНуров
@@ҶамшедНуровthey do,very often.
@@ҶамшедНуровI know a Albanian - Serbian couple and also a Pashtun - Tadjik couple.
Tajiks who mix with other ethnicities are a shame on us!
Don't Forget the Alan, Sarmatians, Saka, etc! These are important Iranic nomadic horsemen who spread as far west as Ukraine and Hungary and as far east as Mongolia.
Spain
This a false bust of Cyrus, there are evidence to prove that Cyrus was a black man. And the Persians were black people.
@@caniceedward Indo Europeans were black. Iranic people were black. Then who were not the blacks Mr afrocentrist
@@caniceedward Cause as an Indian I can definitely say with genetic evidence that Aryans(North Indians and Iranians) were lighter skinned than their counterparts and definitely had no black ancestry. The scythians were described unanimously by Chinese and the Greeks as pale skinned red haired and green eyed.
They are Turkic not Iranic
Love from Iriston (Ossetia) to our Iranian brothers ! ❤
❤❤❤
Hi brother ❤❤❤❤
@@SunRise22482
🙋🏻♂️❤
Ossetians are the survivors of the Scythians
@@Khonyrth
How do you do.
Where are you from ?
I'm a Persian Tajik 🥰❤️ I love all the iranic peoples and I wish that we will united in the future in one country
You are Arab
@@یکتورکایرانی Ok Mongolian
I am an Iranian Kurd and an Iranian Azeri and a Yazidi Kurd and I also wish all our 400 million Aryan/Iranic/Iranian people of all The Median - Achaemenid Empire/The Persian Empire could become one country! I only only wish!
Various things unite people like common language, ethnicity, marriage and blood lines, common enemy or common advantages. Before a unification can happen even in form of a federation of very close countries like how Europe is today though, foreign invasive and dividing influence in forms of ideology and religion must lose its power. Fighting this influence could well be another uniting factor. As you can imagine, when it comes to big powers like Russia and China, subjugating smaller countries and taking advantage of them is a lot easier than dealing with a big powerful country or a federation and they wouldn't want to see any unification happen.
@@NickG_ What do you mean?
Wonderful video. Iranian Peoples have always fascinated me with the sheer vastness of physical and cultural space they inhabit.
Also hoping to see some more Middle East content soon, maybe Levant?
Thanks dadash, for your your highly detailed research, examining our culture, and other cultures as well. Your videos are great, continue them please, there is vast content in regards of topics, but always do us in between, because our heritage is so complex, and incredibly hard to understand, because of its intricacy. Love to you my brother, I adore my people.
Thank you bro
No, thank you!@@AncestralBrew
UA-cam:ROBERT SEPHER VIDEOS 👍
I have kurdish origins and I did a dna test and according to the test I am related to all of these ancient civilizations like sintashta, bactria margiana, manneans and even zagrosian neolithic farmers and even more…İt is incredible to know your ancestors who lived thousands of years ago.
kral geçen yıl indirim vardı kit sipariş ettim sonra pttden mektup diye gönderdim. bu kadar başka birşey yok.@@personxx.2129
I am an Iranian Kurd myself and I am also an Iranian Azeri and then I am also a Yazidi/Ezidi Kurd and I say we Kurds and we Azeris and we Yazidi Kurds are all Aryan/Iranic/Iranian/Indo - Iranian Peoples and I wish we could unite all our 400 million Aryan/Iranic/Iranian Peoples into one country called The Median - Achaemenid Empire! I only only wish!
@@delaramsalmassi4063there is no such thing as "Iranian people"
@@kurdekibedin1347 Yes there is! You are most likely a zionist pan - Kurd or a zionist itself.
@@kurdekibedin1347there are 3 big ethnic groups that defrent from iranic people 1moguls/central asian peolpe 2indian people/south asian peolpe 3 arabic people/midle eastens like saudi
There is no more dna division and deference between a Kurdish and a baluchi all are iranic believe our wont its not change anything. come back to your root
One of the most beautiful looking people in the world.
The Alans/Ossetians and the Wakhis and the Sogdians are also iranic. The language of ossetians is ' Irōn' or Aryan. In the North there are the Lithuanians and Latvians. A clip on UA-cam shows a Lithuanian who understands Sanskrit spoken by an Indian lady who in turn understands Lithuanian. It is known that Avestan is very close to Sanskrit. The Aryan/Iranic languages are from the Satem branch of indo-european languages. Germanic languages, Latin and Greek are from the Kentum W branch. Red ware pottery for the E branch, gray corded ware pottery for the W branch. Tree of life myth for the W branch, Cosmic Egg myth for E branch. So the Two branches differ quite a bit☆
@OKay-ox3kh may be true about the looks of Lithianians but the German theory obviously was for reference to the Germanic people, Germans & Scandinavians. However, I m still saying that the Aryans are the same as the Iranics, the two words refer to the same group. That s why I showed that Ossetians give the name irōn to their language! Please see again my comment. In Cucuteni in E Romania in Moldavia there are ceramics with swastikas on them. I am still curious to see this Aryan symbol on Pottery from Germany or Scandinavia. Not just this but there are Sanskrit words in Romanian whose vocabulary is mostly based on Latin[ Roman conquest of Dacia at 106 AD]. Furthermore, the Aryans to the E and W of the Caspian were Vedic[F.Staal--Discovering the Vedas].
The clip featuring Lithuanian and Sanskrit speakers are a proof of linguistic affiliation and never a political statement. Period.
@OKay-ox3kh The Aryan theory in Germany predates WW2...by quite a bit. Max Müller is well known for his translation of the Vedas, the laws of Manu and the first Sanskrit lexicon in Europe. Did Müller study Lithuanian? If he did, Lithuanian is from the satem E branch while German is from the kentum W branch...I think he saw the differences very well being a good linguist.
@@alexgabriel5423 :
@@OKay-ox3kh bro, this dude made some serious mistakes. for one, i am 1/2 scythian 1/2 alans and so are all the natives of tehran. our race has nothing to do with rest of iran nor germany. we are natural light skin people that you occasionally see in tehran or 1/20th of the tehran population as others moved in
This was fascinating but I wish it was a little longer ❤
If I understand this correctly the Iranian people have the same ancestry as the Europeans. The Yamnaya culture also came to Western Europe…
My ex husband is Iranian. He is very proud on his ancestry. Accidentally to him Iranians are Arians. I once made the mistake of calling him an Arab. He was so offended. It seems that Iranians don’t like Arabs that much and certainly don’t want to be mistaken for one. Iran is a beautiful country with enormous generous people. They have a very old and beautiful culture. Sadly enough the ayatollah’s make life miserable for the people.
Arabs and Indo-Iranians are Muslims, but Indo-Iranians and Arabs are not as related as some would expect. The Arabs have greater ancestry from peoples of the Levant and have little or no European ancestry, however the Indo-Iranians do have an Indo-European genetic load and Iranian hunter-gatherers, the Indo-European ancestry varies from 10% to 35% depending on the ethnicity.
Most Iranians hate Arabs ( except supporters of the Islamic regime ) as the Islam is an Arabic /Abrahamic Religion.
Most Iranians hate Arabs ( except supporters of the Islamic regime ) as the Islam is an Arabic /Abrahamic Religion.
@@eltecnico9541Why would anyone even think that Indo-Iranians (Aryans) and Semitic Arabs are related?! They have completely different histories. I also dont think that Koreans, Ethipians and Italians are related just because these groups are christians lol
Iranians have nothing to with Arabs! Stop refering to a lion as a cow.
As an Afghan(Pashtun) salam to all the iranic brothers and sisters around the world
Same
درود برادر
Good stuff! The Scythians! The Yue Zhi, the original inhabitants of northern China were Indo Iranan speakers! Tocarians! Strangely western indo european speaking gingers! Cousins all
Why strangely? Iranic Scythians are described of having red hair, its a fact
I'm Egyptian and I'd love to watch and understand more about the Egyptians and how they've evolved into how they look and the culture they have adopted today in comparison to how they were in ancient times.
Short answer, Egyptians are not Arabs. Modern Egyptians are only 17% Arab according to their DNA.
I love your videos, so many information , i wish it were longer. Best wishes from Brasil.
UA-cam:ROBERT SEPHER mit "The Origins of the First EUROPEANS" 👋
Glad you’re back with your main gig.
Nice overview with easy to understand timelines. Well done!
I'm of mixed heritage, but my dad is from Elam; he actually still owns a small house there.
Elamites believe in polytheism?
Excellent video!
Thank you bro
@@AncestralBrew You are welcome.
Yess super now please serve some lentil curry so I can f**t in the toilet.
Salam my true brothers and sisters, Iran will one day be free from the oppressive regime. Your people will not be subject to western depravity, but one day you will be free in your culture and have your home back. Moafagh bashid!
You know that the ones who brought Khomeini to power were the West, right? They are all liars
Very good video. I am very interested in Iranian history and culture. Regards from Iceland.
Thank you for feedback.
Disover the real Iran 🇮🇷 with our channels.
دستت درد نکنه، خیلی باحال بود، سپاسگزارم
جاوید شاه ❤️🔥 پاینده ایران و ایرانی ❤️🔥
The Original Iranics were Nordic looking folks. A shame that they couldnt keep their race pure and free from mongrelization.
Nope, the original Iranics looked like Iranics look today. Ancient DNA and skeleton samples of Iranians from past and presence literally confirm that their race has been kept pure and free from foreign admixture. Obsess less over Iranians/Aryans and get a life.
@@texmexexpress but those Browns of today are not Iranics. They were Iranified by the original Iranics which indeed was white nordic looking folks.
The Original Iranics did look just like today iranians/aryans
Thank you so so much for these videos. I Iove to learn about human biodiversity and history.
Afganistán is a new thing.
Tajik is more recent split of iranic
Tajik 😂😂😂
Tajik is Soviet tea bearer.
@@Yilkanzhi_Nooristani yes but a genetic continuity since Iron & bronze age, who are your ancestors *Dravidians* or *Aryans* from Central Asia??
"Overall, we demonstrate here a remarkable example of genetic continuity since the Iron Age in Indo-Iranian populations from Central Asia despite the frenzy of population migrations in the area since the Bronze Age. Similar to Zhabagin et al. work65, the present study shows no impact of the Arab cultural expansion in Central Asia on the Indo-Iranian speaker’s genetic diversity, 𝗱𝗲𝘀𝗽𝗶𝘁𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗼 𝗮 𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗳𝘁 𝗶𝗻 𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗴𝘂𝗮𝗴𝗲 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗧𝗮𝗷𝗶𝗸𝘀. 𝗪𝗲 𝗮𝗹𝘀𝗼 𝗱𝗼 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘀𝗲𝗲 𝗮 𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗲 𝗳𝗹𝗼𝘄 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗜𝗿𝗮𝗻 𝗱𝗲𝘀𝗽𝗶𝘁𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗣𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗶𝗮𝗻 𝗰𝘂𝗹𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘄𝗵𝗶𝗰𝗵 𝗹𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝗮 𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗴𝘂𝗮𝗴𝗲 𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗳𝘁 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗮𝗻 𝗲𝗮𝘀𝘁-𝗜𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗶𝗮𝗻 𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗴𝘂𝗮𝗴𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗮 𝘄𝗲𝘀𝘁-𝗜𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗶𝗮𝗻 𝗶𝗻 𝗧𝗮𝗷𝗶𝗸𝘀-𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝗬𝗮𝗴𝗵𝗻𝗼𝗯𝗶𝘀 𝗸𝗲𝗽𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝗲𝗮𝘀𝘁-𝗜𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗶𝗮𝗻 𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗴𝘂𝗮𝗴𝗲"
Source: Guarino-Vignon, P., Marchi, N., Bendezu-Sarmiento, J. et al. Genetic continuity of Indo-Iranian speakers since the Iron Age in southern Central Asia. Sci Rep 12, 733 (2022).
Ew another Farsiswan kusfarosh 🤢
What a glorious beard. I'm truly envious.
Please make a video about the DNA of the Palestinians, and if possible also make a video about the Lebanese and especially the Saudi Arabs and current Jews from Israel. Would the current Jews be mixed with Europeans? gratitude
Palestine is really (Syrian, Iraqi, Egyptian, Lebanese and a mixture of, Greek, Italian, French, Russian tribes)...
He actually is doing that xD
Modern European Jews are genetically half Middle Eastern jewish and half European, mainly Greek, Italian related, as well as some German and Eastern European ancestry. The Lebanese are the descendants of the ancient Canaanites, and have 90 to 92 percent of their ancestry, and some 8 to 10 percent arab, sub Saharan African and some Greek ancestry
Thank you very interesting.
Glad you enjoyed it
Perfect 🙌
Finally, you're doing a video on your own ethnic origins :)
I had my DNA result it shows the map of Medes Empire 😁 which is accurate but without mentioning that I am a Kurd. I guess most DNA labs missing the point that political borders do not represent DNA results or ethnicity.. they either label us Kurds “Iranian/Persia” or “Anatolian” or “Caucasus” but all false and failing to find the right ethnic group. We have a group of Kurdish friends and all did the test and all identical.
Diaco the Great was the king of the Medes who founded Iran. How do you think Kurds are not Iranian? The map of today's Iran is a large part of the map of the Median Empire😂😑
Where did you do the test? I am also Kurdish and wanna do test my DNA.
@@Dubil_7Kurds aren't Medes.
@@texmexexpressMedes are an ancient iranic ethnicity. Medes are not Kurds but Kurds are descendants of Medes and Parthians. According to a lot of linguists,Medes and Parthians are considered ancestor of all north western iranic peoples.
@@Yusufsnmz07 We can agree on that.
Great video. I really like your videos. This is how studying genetics and linguistics help better understand the history. Can you please do a video on the genetics of Kalash and burusho people. Both are quite unique populations in south central asia.
They are not south central Asians. We central Asians consider them south Asians. Another nonsense comment which is not rare Here
@@khorasan123456 Yeah they are South Asians. Even Pashtuns baluch etc. are South Asians.
The Kalash descend from pre-Indo-Iranians in Central Asia.
I am from Afghanistan ❤
We our family 🇮🇷 🇦🇫 🇹🇯✊
👍❤️
Nothing great about you or afghans they are beggars if the world now
Interesting video
Keep it up
Awesome, video! What technology did the Elamites bring to the Achaemenid empire that allowed it to expand quickly? I really can not tell from the texts that I have studied. I asked ChatGPT that question and all I received was this: " It's important to note that the Achaemenid Empire was a vast and diverse empire that incorporated various regions and cultures, but the core Persian elements were responsible for the technological and administrative innovations that characterized the empire."
Quite a lot of stuff, from their writing system to their architecture, but probably the most important influence of the Elamite on Persians was the transfer of their tradition of excellent administration something that was very influential on the development of the first Persian empire (The Elamite World - Javier Alvarez-Mon - Page 481) Elamites were very good administrators and although we have not yet been able to completely decipher the linear Elamlite language we know that the word "Dabeer" (دبیر) which in Persian means scribe and administrator is actually an Elamite word only indicating they might have continued living along Persians as some sort of bureaucratic class for a few centuries afterwards (The decipherment of Linear Elamite writing - Francois Desset - A Lecture at Cambridge University ) We know that their language was still being used at least for 1200 years after the beginning of the first Persian empire. They didn't disappear they were simply assimilated into the Persian world and with them so did their language, culture and traditions.
Can you do a video on the different groups in Pakistan?
Pashtoon are central asian Peoples.their haplo group is R1a.the same as the eastren european like ukrain.russian.the adapt the iranian language group pashto.iranian are j2 haplo group.the where some time part of the iranian empire.or some time free khanat.they have always problems with the persians empire. Bactria was their land..but all pashtoon are not with the same dna.some are khushan.some are Huns.the have also some mixing with the indus valey civi lization.the balochi are south iranian. Balochistan was always part of the persians empire. Their language is iranian. They are 100%east iranian.they give a great contribut to the war against the roman empire. They fight many wars against the roman empire.
Consider the Zend Avesta the Story of Yama the Bright or Yama Ksaeta or Jamshed. He dwelled in the Far North where the Sun rose up and set down once in a year. He was told by the gods about a great cold and he built a mote to protect people and animals. This is Not a myth. An Aryan Cemetery exists in the middle of the finno ugric population Mariel east of Moscow. There are 45 wooden posts marking the Graves just like you can see in Cemetery in the Sands, a UA-cam clip.
And also ....
French linguist Pinault pointed out, by comparing Tokharian and Indo-Aryan languages, that there were elamite influences in both sides. The Oxus Civilization is thought to be the place from where they came.
Which points to an Iranic origins
Really nice video and I really liked your beard, nice beard.
The Aryans were northern Scythian nomads who migrated south from around the Caspian Sea 4,000-3,500 years ago.
Their parentage is Cro-Magnon Mongolian YDNA-C, which became the base race of Europe.
The sibling is YDNA-Q, the main Native American people who passed through the Arctic Ocean coast to the Americas, and YDNA-R and Q lived in close proximity.
Loooool Haplogroup c predates Mongolians and Mongolians them self are mixed their mtDNA is mostly east Eurasian but their y dna is west and north Eurasian Haplogroup c is found in old Caucsiod people the oldest is as well even jomon were Haplogroup c and are Caucsiod looking Mongolians are mixed like the aniu
@@famitsus987
YDNA extracted from a European Cro-Magnon bone.
30,000 years ago is YDNA-C.
YDNA-C and YDNA-N are 20,000 years old.
Wasn't it?
Jomon people are YDNA-D and southbound.
Some YDNA-C was also associated with the Jomon people, or it has been traced.
Lol Aryans were NOT scythians 🤣🤣🤣
Aryans would call Scythians Saka and regard them are uncivilized barbarians.
@@Chairman_MaoZedong
The Aryan YDNA-R did not arise suddenly.
They are northern nomads who branched off from the Cro-Magnon Mongols. That is, they are subordinate to the Mongolian gene tree.
@@ミツタニユウ
if we keep on breaking dna then we will end up declaring homo erectus as Indo-European. Lol
liked and subscribed chon dadashami.
Dear sir can you please tell us " who are indo european are"??? Thanks
The western world never forget to say great each time the prononce alexender, so we should do the same each time we say Cyrus or Darius The great
The way Persians seized power from Medes /Kurds happened by a palace coup. Cyrus was son in law of Kurdish King and Cyrus claimed throne via Kurdish King Astyages’ daughter and civil war broke out. Some Kurdish generals sided on Cyrus and removed Astyages from power. That’s how the first Persian Kingdom founded on the lands of Medes and inheriting their administration, religion, laws and army.
Das stimmt Bra 👍
The Kurdish ethnicity didn't even exist back then, Kurd refers to an Iranian nomad in Middle Persian lol
Medes were not kurds..that's such a crazy claim(medes that rulled before cyrus the great weren't even nomads, the first time the word kurd ever was mentioned in history was by sasanid persian king refering to a nomad iranian)..medes(mad) were an ancient iranian people, alogside persians(pars) and parthians(part). All iranians today are a mix of these ancient groups, many other iranians decsend from ancient medes not just kurds! And cyrus the great wasn't the grandson of medes, he was half median himself. He was the uniter of medes and persians. You can clearly see that in persepolis engravings,showing persian and medes hand in hand, made by his son in law(darius the great) and grandchildren(xerxes).
Even if what you say is true, both the medes and Persians were Iranic
i consider the leks, the lurs, the kurds & the gilaks all four as the descendants of the medes + there is an update with some newly made proofs that make a fifth ethnicy/people as descendants of the medes also exactly said the sigynian subbranch of the medes these are the carpathian hutsul/ghucul people of bordering north-romania/southwest-ukraine made them being genetically in first case a mixture of geto-dacians+slavs but from their origin(the old substrat) a iranic median sigynnian people (that mean to a lesser degrees median than geto-dacian or slavic but anyway enough genetically and lexicaly median percentage to be considered as a people of iranic/median origin), the first proofs for that are antique historians herodotus, strabo & apollonios, they wrote about the median tribe the siginians how it's written they travelled from media and settled maybe some 100-200 years ago before herodotus time in west-romania or northwest-romania (and surrounding areas to the west and north but generally you can say a lot of them lived in that time especially in the tysa river & mares river areas) and herodotus the historians lived around 450 BC so there were two options when the date were when that median sigynian tribe left their homeland and moved via armenia/turkey to transilvania, the first is around 640 BC (the following years after phraortes death when the things get Bad for 28 years for the median kingdom because the assyrian-skythian mixed king made phraortes' son kyaxares for this time to a vassal in his own kingdom) or in the time around 540 BC (when the median kingdom collapsed and the persians took over) however it is said that the sigynnes wear median clothing and had many median customs and the sigynnians themselve said (to herodotus) that their were median colonists or descendants of the medes while the historican strabo (who lived 63BC-23AD) wrote about siginians who lived near the south caspian sea (southwest caspia region like gilan & mazandaran & azerbaijani north talysh mountains until the beginning of tabaristan that means the areas where today gilaks, mazandaranis, talishs live) these siginns were the ones who stayed in media and didn't leave like herodot's sigynnes. strabo said about these siginians that in general they practise persians customs and he mentioned like herodot their small horses race which were shaggy long haired flat-nosed/short-snooted ponies that pulled a chariot or cart in a four-horse-team also often driven by women, maybe that small horse race is related to the north-romania carpathian hutuli-horses/ponies. so where ist the connection of the median subbranch of the sigynes (apollonios wrote them also as sigunns with u) and the luri people? you see it in the name of the shughani dialect speakers lurs. somewhere i also read that sigynians where described as living alongside with an unknown gaulaki tribe (possibly the gilaks are meant to be them but the source of that statement looks not so proven possibly it was only an internetbased false info not sure about that). but something to the kurds, i noticed in strabos' time there were mentioned a gouranii tribe living alongside with medes (atropatanian medes?) so it looks like 2000 years ago the subbranch of ghorani-speakers of proto-kurds already existed (in northwest iran) and to the west in the same time not far away from iran in the bordering southwest turkey lived the karduchi people who were also proto-kurds, by the way a town in the antique time in turkey was called sigynos. but i want go back to the topic with proofs that the proto-ghuculs of the carpathian mountains were in fact of iranic median sigynian origin, the ethnicon itself for example has 3 theories of it's meaning and etymoligical roots (until today nobody could say or proof what the ethnonym hucul really means) the 3 theories what IT means are all iranic median = luri/leki/kurd/gilaki cognates: 1. it comes from the gilaki word for "mountain"="qukh"(but in a median dialectical way is more possible cuz there was in earlier times a between-sound of the letter k & g (like kg) so like gkukh' that leads to ghukh'+ul/ol(adjective ending) so the proto-huculian(sigynian-orientated) word/ethnonym would mean "the people from the mountains/mountainous people"(meant are sure the carpathian mountains rather than elburz or talishs mountains in my opinion)=ghukh'uls=ghuc'uls.
2. gilaki word "houz" for "lake" so hutsuls would mean " people who live by the lake" (speculative said maybe it could be the caspian who counts as the biggest lake of the word or maybe the east-part of urmia lake or just one of the smaller lakes in the carpathian mountains but it just one of the possibilities)
3. gilaki word "ghut" for "immersion" that would mean ghutsuls mean "(water)diver)/aquanaut".
that leads to another interessting exclusive huculian word (that is not to be found in ucrainian language) that word has also etymological ties to median(luri/kurd/laki/gilaki) cause it sounds related to these two gilaki words by meaning "hooz"(lake/pond) & "ghuth"(immersion/diving) that huculian word is "ghuk" and means "waterfall" so connected with watermasses/lake/diving somehow.
another interessting exclusive huculian word (not found in ukrainian language) is "kootüga" and means "dog" while in the luri language "katu" is "dog" these words are really close and belong to median dialects in origin, besides that word for dog, in the luri and in the median language there is a second word for dog it's median "spak" but if you think again about the dialectical typicalness of earlier times with the k/g between-sound you can say "sphagk" shows you the dialectical changing in the luri word "sag"(also meaning dog) where the p was fallen away but still you can consider it as of median origin.
a huculian word (not in ukrainian language again) for "farm-animals/domestic-animals/livestock-animals" is "marga" what you can compare to the luri & gilaki word "morgen" for "chicken/hen/rooster" what sure is etymologicaly related with the hutsulian marga.
one last word is huculian "bardka" for "axe" while inuri language "bard" means "stone" it got in my opinion prehistoric roots in the time where it was not everywhere common to use weapons made of copper and bronze but also from stone but anyway i think etymologicaly the word "bronce" is also connected with "bard".
the last thing i wanna say about the sigynians what herodot thought about what their ethnonym could be he used to detonate the name with "spear" or in the othe other side with "traders"(or "hucksters") but he just speculated and didn't know for sure.
Wonderful 😍 thanks so much 🙏 but way only 4 minutes for this wide subject you have the knowledge and facility ??? Carry on good work good luck best wishes sirus London
Ancestralbrew is a hidden gem on the web. You deserve so many more followers bro!! As a super tolerant Persian, I know where I get it from. Rest in peace to the best king the world ever knew. The tolerant and powerful, Cyrus the great
Love from Tajik of Afghanistan ♥️
Thanks a lot for this nice work 👏 🙌 🙏 👍 😊
Although you did already cover the Indians I have a request desired for my own separate Bengali ethnicity. the request is therefore making another discrete video on the indian video's later mentioned southeast asian and tibetan mixture into the south asians focusing on the rather ignored eastern ethnicity of Densely Populated Bengalis formed from further diverging of previously mentioned groups.
Thank you for this very accurate information about the origins of Iranic people.
I watch many of your videos and I have learned a great deal about different nations origins.
Would you please tell us about Croatians DNA as well? That you again!
Iranics carry Rz93 Hapolgroup and migrated from Eastern Europe into Central Asia mainly their descendants are Afghans and isolated Tajiks.
Only Nuristanis. Most Afghans are either Indian looking or East Asian. Also Kalash are a good shout for Indo-Aryan ancestry.
@@matrixxx3662 Indians/Pakistanis look black buddy kalash would pass as average Afghan in Afghanistan and stand out in India and Pakistan also many Kalash and Nuristani look straight Indian. The Afghans that pass as Indian are from NE Afghanistan like Jalalabad and Nagrahar province they are heavily Dardic admixed Lmao
@@Kazim28pashtun are closest to iranic tajik then to Indians
@@Kazim28 no you are wrong nearest people to Iranians are Khandari Pashtuns and Heratis.
Pashtuns from Pakistan are nearest to South Asians cause they are mixed with them not Afghan Pashtuns. Tajiks in Afghanistan have a lot of East Eurasian admixture and South Asian Hunter gatherer ancestry Pashtuns have around the same south Asian admixture and almost no East Eurasian admixture. Iranians also have no East Eurasian admixture.
@@persiansoundsAfgNuristanis dont look Indian at all.
I Like the videos where you talk to the camera it makes the video more „professional“ if you know what I mean
Your presentation has one BIG FLAW. That is the Iranian tribes that came to the Iranian platue since 7000 years ago in sporadic migrations and drastically increased around 4000 years ago where from north central Asia and have ZERO connections to the fake imaginary Yamnaya tribe of west of Caspian sea! The 3 major Iranian tribes the migrated into the Iranian platue some 4000 years ago were: Persians, Medes, and Parthians all of whom were of same Pre European race with black or brown hair, brown eyes, with somewhat olive skin color and morphologically tall and slender. They looked the same as modern Persians and had nothing to do with present looking Europeans who have genetically mutated since the bronz age from the Indo Iranian looks to the pale white skin of today.
PEACE.
متاسفانه دولتهای استعماری ، این دروغ را مدام میگویند که ایرانیان چهار هزار سال پیش از شمال روسیه وارد ایران شدند ، این نظریه یک دانشمند روس بود که هفتاد سال قبل این نظریه رد شد ، اکنون با آمدن علم زنتیک ثابت شده آریایی واقعی مردمان غرب ایران در کوهای ژاگرس هستند این را دانشمندان دانمارکی موسوم به گروه کپنهاک اثبات کردند ، در سال دوهزار و هفده . دانشمندان در بیست سال قبل با بررسی استخوان های ایلامیان باستان دریافتند که بیش از هفتاد درصد ژن ایلامیان دربیشتر از هفت هزارسال قبل با مردم امروز ایران مطابقت دارد. دانشمندان نیوزیلندی چند هفته قبل ثابت کردن زبان انگلیسی در هشت هزارسال قبل به غرب ایران و کوههای زاگرس برمیگردد. اگر آزمایش ژنتیک ایرانیان را در یوتوب دنبال کنی ایرانیان خالص ترین ژن ها رو دارند . من بخوام توضیح بدم شرحش بسیار مفصل هست ، اینگونه مطالب بیشتر در آکادمی ها بحث میشود، نه در مدارس و یا سطح جامعه ، چون قدرتهای جهانی از اینکه مردم ایران تاریخ بیش از دوازده هزارسال خود را بداند وحشت دارند ، چون ایران در طی هزاران سال همواره هژمون جهانی بوده است .
we have more in common with each other ➡️central Asian countries
Afghanistan
Kazakhstan
Iran
Uzbekistan
Kyrgyzstan
Tajikistan
Turkmenistan
And we should be proud to be united central Asian
🇦🇫 🇹🇯 🇹🇲 🇰🇬 🇺🇿 🇮🇷 🇰🇿 💪🏻🌟
I’m Pashtun and I always hear (past and present) of OTHERS always stating Pashtuns are “Eastern Iranic peoples”. I’ve never heard it in my family (including from the elders), from my own immediate tribal people, nor in the wider Pashtun community ever parroting this. Pashtuns themselves make a distinction of this, that they’re an independent group of people, not that: “we came from Eastern Iranic people”.
But you cannot deny reality. Your elders deny it because they feel it takes away from their heritage, but being Iranian, and being Iranic is two different things. You're Iranic peoples there is no doubt about it.
You can do the research for yourself, it's not hard, or you can watch ancestral brew, he does highly detailed research, but Tajiks are not just Iranic, but they are Persians, I'm jus bringing that as example. Pashtun is a Iranic people.
I'm not very informed about this topic but what I do know is that what people say or don't say doesn't change facts
@@agostocobain2729 but that’s the point I’m making, YOU as a non Pashtun keep reiterating that Pashtuns are an “Iranic group of peoples”, Pashtuns themselves don’t go on about this. It’s nothing to do with my family personally, as I said I’ve never, as an example, interacted with a wide range of Pashtuns (say online or at a function) and we all suddenly concluded that were all Iranic peoples-it’s never stipulated by Pashtuns themselves. That’s all I was stating.
Also, why stop at Iranic peoples, why not reference the Steppes? Or that Pashtuns are the descendants of the Andronovons? Or why stop there and not label us just descendants of indo Europeans?
Anyway, we’re Pashtuns ✌️ and no, we don’t need to be forced fed “but…but you’re Iranic peoples”.
@@agostocobain2729Ah, so, you're Iranian yourself?
I'm just in awe of that magnificent Persian beard.
Basically a original Mediterannean people usually olive to light mocha or caramel in skin hues with straight, curly, wavy, and sometimes shaggy black colored hair and to a lesser extent very dark brown with eyes that are usually black, brown, and hazel descend from Anatolian Farmers as do original Greeks, Italians, Spanish, Portuguese, Arabs, Kurds, Jews, Hebrews, Assyrians, Akkadians, Arameans, Turks, Armenians, And Yazidis yeah.
Ah, I see you’re familiar with the basal population genetic groups! Nice!
You are more or less correct, but I would say that Anatolian usually makes up about a ~33% of most Iranic DNA. The second ~33% is Zagrosian. The remainder is ~15% from the Caucasus Hunter-Gather populations, ~5-10% Natufian (Arabian peninsula), and the remainder is a small chunk of Western European Hunter-Gatherers (~5-10%), trace amounts of Turkic/Mongolian/East Asian (up to 5%). Ancient Ancestral Indian (up to 3%).
The closest non-Iranic population groups to Iranic peoples are Caucasian or Mesopotamian groups, such as Assyrians, Armenians, Anatolian Turks, and some Iraqi Arab tribes as well. After that, it’s the modern Mediterranean groups such as the Lebanese, Syrians, Greeks, etc. who do share Mesopotamian ancestry and are descended from the ancient Anatolians more than any other group.
@@USASPORTSCARDSplease distinguish between modern day Iranians and Iranics people that are nearest to the original Andronova or Sintahsta culture are Afghans and Tajik and they have a balance of both European Hunter gatherer ancestry and Anatolian farmer ancestry while Persians and Kurds like other west Asians are heavily Zagros and Anatolian farmer shifted. Modern day Iranians are not Iranic very minimal only linguistically and some cultural values are Iranic ..
Yes, but there were people with light eyes in Anatolian Farmers. It is important to note the people in Iran with higher prevalence of light eyes are those with the smallest Yamnaya-Sintasha-Andronovo DNA. Such as the Mazandaranis, Gilaks and Lurs. There a lot of light eyes in Sardians as well.
@@persiansoundsAfg If we want to truly be precise than we have to decide on what we’re calling the original “Iranic” people. What timeline do we decide who is who? Because the “Proto-Iranians” most closely resemble modern day Iranians. However if we really want to roll it back all the way to the “Indo-Iranians”, then yes, Yaghnobis (closest), Pamiris, Tajiks, etc. are the closest modern day people groups we have among the descendants of the original Iranic tribes.
@@USASPORTSCARDS Iranic language, culture, ancestry derived from Eastern Europe. Yaz culture is where the mixing between Iranics and BMAC people happened. The Yaghnobis are nearest to Iranics and Yaz culture, single Persian from Shiraz single study is also near Yaz culture only atypical results likely of mixed ancestry of some sort or maybe even he’s part European.
Regardless, Iranics labeled as proto Iranics are the actual Iranics and their ancestry is minimal in Iran only Khorosani eastern Iranians have decent amount of actual Iranic ancestry.
Do you have any videos on the Indus Valley civilisation?
A lot of Iranians need to see this. They still look at Afghans as “Indians” or people that are not related to them at all. When literally, our land, once called Āryānā, is the ancestral homeland of the ancient Aryans and the modern day Iranic peoples.
Kossi herati. You people are too uneducated. Central Asia is the ancestor land.
You besawad.
😂
@@Yasa5na 🤡
The ancient Aryans homeland is the Central Steppe not Iranian Plateau 😂
@@shivpatel733 okay mr. Patel. You can sit your Indo-Aryan bum down now.
Massagetai are Jats of South Asia who migrated into South Asia during the Rule of Darius the Great to invade Indus valley region. Persian empire employed many Sakas to invade the region
Greeting from Kurdistan ❤️☀️💚
I am myself an Iranian Kurd and a Yazidi Kurd and I say we Kurds and we Yazidi Kurds are Aryan/Iranic/Iranian/Indo - Iranian Peoples and I wish we could unite all our 400 million Aryan/Iranic/Iranian Peoples into one country called The Median - Achaemenid Empire! I only only wish!
Your haplogroup my kurdy friend is R1a or J1 J2, you guys are not the native Assyrians, i personally like Persia, but Kurdistan is some wannabe ancient assyrian empire, its a pardoy of the Assyrian empire. Im seeing you guys online everywhere acting like your Assyrian when your not, your haplogroups are different and also when you do get the Assyrian R1B its because of rapes and forced conversions of the assyrians and taking Assyrian woman. dont flatter yourself brother, you are a nomadic mede or another iranic person. leave our history alone, stop plagiarising. First you take our land, than our music and clothing, than suppress our religion, take our woman and your people even want our entire history. you guys are nothing like Darius the mede and his peoples. i don't say this with hate or malice, but frustration.
@@bugsytv6852there is no such thing as "Assyrians" today. Everyone one who dealt with the history knows that you appropriated the name "assyrian" in the middle of the 19th century
@@delaramsalmassi4063 I am myself Iranian persian, and I would rather suggest that we fix Iran in the first place 😅
@@calculator-sd5370 I agree with you but I still wish all our Aryan/Iranic/Iranian people would love/like to come back to Iran and I wish they would love to become one country with Iran! I only wish!
Not to get into a random flame war but I think that most modern scholars question if the Cyrus cylinder can be considered a precursor to modern notions of human rights
Wonderful people judging by the Iranians I have met
please do lebanon and syria and please include the maronite and druze in it as well as the sunny and shia muslims
Leave Pakistan out of this because Balochistan is historically linked to Punjab and Sindh through Indus valley civilization. Most Iranians think of Baloch as foreign because of their medium brown skin color and clothing. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa is historically linked to Punjab through Gandharan Buddhist Civilization. Original inhabitants are Hindkowaan Pahari North Punjabis. There are absolutely no Zoroastrian relics or artifacts found anywhere in Pakistan however plenty of Buddhist and Hindu relics and artifacts found in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan which proves that Iranic people are not indigenous however migrated east to Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa in search of fertile agricultural lands close to rivers.
1)Peoples from balochistan are original iranian Peoples. Their language is iranian. And they have no thing to do with india.
2)the pashtoon Peoples are from central asia origine.the iranian haplo group is j2.the pashtoon are R1a.the same as the east european. How you conect the pashtoon with the karala Peoples. The kpk regione and balochistan were never part of india.the where always part of the persian empires. Or some time free khanat pashtoon are not a single race.some are indoeuropean some are hun.some are khushans shytians. But the are not indians.
@@hayatullahkhan476 Baloch and Pashtuns are migrants they are not indigenous as proved by history and most importantly archaeology the biggest proof of all as Buddhist Hindu Indus valley artifacts and relics found everywhere in Balochistan and kpk and no proof of Zoroastrianism in these provinces
@@muslim_first.pashtoons emigrates from Afghanistan.because their land is not fertile.many of them emigrate to india Punjab.sind.but the kpk region is part of Afghanistan.this region is part of the central asia.and it is consider as the caucasian inhabitants region. The indian continent start at attock brige or khoshal ghar brige. You can see the land changed.also the peoples changed. The language changed.
2)the balochi are not emigrate the are the original iranian Peoples.they are living their from about 7000 years.
They fought the battle of carreh against the roman empire. This was the worst defeat for the romans history. Then with the sasanian empire the battle of edessa. Crasso was captur in the 1st battle. Valeriano was captur in the 2nd battle. They were the roman kings..
@@hayatullahkhan476 People here who are arguing about skin colour, probably don't know any real history and arguing needlessly. it's all much ado about nothing.
Environmental factors played a huge role in skin colour determination. High UVR (ultra violet radiation) has led to dark skin colour and low production of UVR led to light skin. By natural selection genes responded to environmental conditions for a human to survive in his own environment.
So arguing about skin colour is a moot point, which is not relevant in a historical setting.
@@samkupp1390 yes this process take thousands of years.we al come from Africa.and we are al africans.
Please make video about Hazara people! ❤
I'm a Hazara from central Afghanistan,
My heritage DNA has
50% China and Mongolia Kazakhstan!
10 % Korea
25 % central Asia (Afghanistan)
5% Iran
5% north India
5% Balkan
Amazing work. I was just reading this. The Elamites (Persians) had civilization in 8000 bc & they invented money (exchange tokens) before the "sumerian"(jewish) indo-europeans did.
elamites spoke a langauge closer to modern day brahui spoken by the baloch people , elamites are closer to balochs than to persians
Elamites are not persian
Elamites were not Iranians. They were a Mesopotamian people with the y haploid group j2, l, and are relayed to the Babylonians, sumerians, Akkadians, Assyrians of Iraq
@@Ashkash821elamites are related to brahui and ancient Indus Valley Indians. Their language is related to Dravidian language of India most likely
@@Paul_Geriat اتفاقا ایلامی ها ایرانی هستند، بیست سال پیش دانشمندان بقایای استخوانهای ایلامی را برسی کردن و متوجه شدن از نظر ژنتیکی بیش از هفتادو پنج درصد مطابق مردم امروز ایران هستند ، رر ظمن مردم میان رودان مدام تحت مهاجرت ایرانیان بودنند
Cyrus’ culturally diversity is why we’re so separate now. It’s closer to the Roman Empire in style. He should have forced us to all be the same so our lands wouldn’t be stripped away look at us now
My country Greece was under Persian rule for most of her history incredible
Lies and you ain’t greek
@@deepb249 i'm Greek and that's true
@@ntenimarkorareincarnation4182 you are a liar
I really really wish from the very bottom of my heart Greece and Iran could become one country called The Grecopersian Empire! I only only wish!
@@delaramsalmassi4063 Hahaha that's funny but thanks and remember we were one country under Persian Empires and Alexander and Persian Satrap Mithridates created a PersoGreek Empire in Pontos
خوشا مرز ایران عنبر نسیم
که خاکش گرامی تر از زر و سیم
زمینش همه عنبر و مشک ناب
به جوی اندرش آب در خوشاب
Can you please do Lebanon next? Thanks for your content 😀
Fun fact, the first instance of the word messiah in the Torah is in reference to Cyrus the Great. The word messiah means savior, and it was because he was a king who saved the Judahites from Babylonian occupation and allowed them to practice their religion once again with restoring the Holy Temple. Cyrus is celebrated in the Jewish religion for his religious tolerance.
I can’t believe the Persian Empire got cucked by Alexander of Macedon 🇬🇷
Alexander was not Greek, He was Macedonian 🇲🇰
@@arthurnarse9275 Who are ethnicity Greek
@@jbstarkiller4626 ancient Macedonians were Hellenophile which means they adopted some of greek culture, but still not ethnically greek.
@@arthurnarse9275 So what would you classify them as?
@@jbstarkiller4626 because they are not Macedonian, I’m Macedonian and I don’t consider myself as Greek
Pashtuns and Balochs are mixed group of Iranic and Indic, specially balochs who have so much of indic origin people. Who identify as balochs today. Infact many of them today speak their Sindhic languages, which are all indic, like jadgali, khetrani, jaffarki etc, they speak balochi as second.
Not Pakhtuns in Afghanistan, maybe some in Pakistan are mixed
@@eatinsomtin9984 yeas, but bordering regions of Afghanistan do have dardic and other indic origin Afghans.
🤣🤣🤣 there is no iranian languages. You are talking about persian languages.there is no iranian languages. You are talking about persian language. In iran there are about 40 million Azerbaijani -Turkic people and they speak in turkish
Turk got mad 30 million kurds in Turkey? Half breed greek and iranic lmao
Pan-Turkism = Pan-Gay
🐴average t*rk be like
there is no such thing as azergaygjan(aran 🇮🇷)and turkey(west kurdistan 🇮🇷)
Average Low IQ Pan-Turk :
Bro please do one on Europe Jews, very interesting mixed race people
You could mention the disaster that was the willing of the Achaemenids to invade Greece. Couldn't you ? The disastrous result was the massive intrusion of Alexander the Greek and his allies, who (instead of destroying Rome, which would have been a much better idea) broke that persian empire. It made a terrible mess. The greek-bactrians separated. They were invaded by Tokharians (Yuezhi in Chinese). All these wars, followed later by wars between the byzantine empire and the sassanid (2d persian) empire, had the result that we can see : Tamerlan, that turcomongolian "sword of god" is now celebrated in Samarcanda, ancient capital of Sogdiana. Only in Tadjikistan there keep being descendents of Andronovians.
Greek empire came first before the Roman empire. How can't they destroyed w/c was non existent?
sarrr we are sanatani lindu sarrrrr we are aryan sarrrrrr we are more white than Iranians, afghans and pakistanis sarrrrrrr believe me sarrrrrrrr We follow vedas sarrrrrr....
Pure Aryan🧑🏿
Pakistani are white you look Indian.
Sarrrrr Sarrrrrrr we Pakistanis are Aryans not like lindu Sarrrrrrr are ancestors where Vedic Aryans Sarrrrr not like present lindus Sarrrrr and we didn't do idol worshiping Sarrrrr of different lindis gods Sarrrrr.
Genetically Indians are more IVC related then Pakistanis that because they can be less steppe and Neolithic Iranian and AASI mix more, but Pakistanis are South Asian and steppe mixed mutts and still brown as Indians what are you even talking about.
Pakistanis are Aryans as African Americans have some white ancestry.
I don’t know but some of our Afghans says that we PASHTUNS belongs to Israel.but some claims that no we are Iranians!
The chronology indicates that the Oxus Civilization died when was born the Indo-Aryan nation (Rig Veda appeared a short time later). And also, at the same time showed up in Anatolia the Mittani Kingdom, ruled by Indo-Aryans.
+ There's little evidence of BMAC genome in NW India
= The shock with Andronovians was deadly for that civilization, HOWEVER there were survivors who mixed with the invadors, AND the main result was the Indo-Aryan people (who fled as kept coming Andronovian invaders).
It's the time when the Aryan concept ("we are civilized ... so, so civilized ... and we conquer whatever we want") was born, impacting also the Andronovians who became then Iranians .... except some who stood completely wild like the Alans, but they are also named Iranians.
You people are idiots who dont know anything except western cooked up stories! YOU PEOPLE DONT STUDY ALSO MODERN DETAILS AND ARCHEOLOGY BESIDES! Very elaborate details are exist in ancient Sanskrit texts that forefathers of Iranians moved out from ancient India! There are called Asuras and this happened after Dasarajna or ten kings war as per Rigveda!
Jeez dude, you really grew that beard out 🧔
Iran 🧿🧿💜💙💙💚
عالی بود داداش دمت گرم 👍
Originating in the Pontic steppe huh? Next you’ll be saying that they were the original Indians of India… naw, the Aryan migration theory was debunked ages ago, look up Dr. David Frawley on the Aryan migration theory and you’ll know who immigrated where lol
phull sapport sarrr, aryan magraton fak onlee shiva is reyal and cow god
Barbarians and Civilizations. We fight each other, but we do best when we team up and start empires.
One question that I am burning to get a reliable answer is: what is the origin and genetic make up of Xinjiang mummies of West China. One of those mummies looks so much like my late mother who was of Kurdish origin of West Iran.
Everybody wants to claim the mummies of Xinjiang , of course on youtube.
Thanks millions for your awesome clips.
... California.
Xinjiang is part of the historical Turkestan region and Persianate Realm. Many Iranic peoples like the Pamiris and Tajiks live there.
There is no evidence of Indo-Iranian Groups originating in Eastern Europe. It's an outdated racist colonial propaganda which Europeans used to prove their supiriority.
Linguistic and genetic analysis have shown that Indo-Europeans originated in the area that is stretched between Eastern Iran, Modern day Pakistan and Western India along the rivers Indus and river Saraswati. Modern-Europeans migrated outward from this area and intermingled with the natives.
There is genetic evidence suggesting this, there is archeological evidence of civilizations as old as 10,000 years old with a cultural continuity in both Iran and India. There is literary evidence of tribes like Yavanas (modern fay Greeks) migrating out of this area.
Bro, there is no Caucasian origin groups in India before 3500 to 4000 years ago. Same with Iran. There was no r1a haploid groups found in remains across all of India as there was only Indus Valley people, who were Mesopotamian related j2 and l in origin. The r1a haploid group started in Iran around 4000 plus years ago, and in India around 3500 and 4000 years at the oldest. The ones that came to India were the sintastha people. Iran had androvono and some yamnaya ancestry. They also had Caucasian hunter gatherer ancestry, which is seen in Central Asia, and lacking among most Indians, except some north West Indian groups
@@jancyvargheese5351
North West Indians look like Indians what do Indians look like with out punjab because I am quite sure many will Indians them selves wouldn't agree with what your saying here. I cant see much of a difference between Indians and Pakistanis apart from few exceptions and no North West Indians dont have any CHG.
@@jancyvargheese5351
Because then they should look like mixed Chechen people.
@@jancyvargheese5351ur wrong about iran
By the way, 500 years ago everyone was nomad and even 3000 years ago most people were still nomad 😁
the iranic people of eurocentric features mostly migrate to east, the whites iranics people are majority in east thats why there is sooo many pictures of afghans with very eurocentric features, paksitan too if you search deeper, the average iranics is more and less like ancestralbrew owner
sooo many pictures are all three that they could find. xd
Iranic people have no "eurocentric" features. These features are Iranic. All of the Iranics feautured in this video where from the Western side of Greater Iran. Afghan/Pakistani Iranics are on average not white.
@@texmexexpress You guys will decide which of you is right. xd
yea i began to believe that all muslim countries seems like always depicted as heavily eurocentric by google maps, what is the meaning of this shit?!@@mr.purple1779
What Should Israel Do Next in Light of Their Declaration of War?
First, we should reflect deeply upon the painful divide that has festered among us, causing the devastating toll of hundreds of lives lost and thousands wounded. We need to yearn for a major change and wholeheartedly unite as one. Only the bonds of unity can shield us from future tragedy and elevate our nation from the abyss of despair.
We cannot afford to nurse bitterness or delay action, waiting for the war's end to ponder our fractured state. Now is the time for introspection. We need to pinpoint the reasons behind our present circumstances and act accordingly.
Our quest for understanding needs to extend to our lives’ very source: the upper force of love, bestowal and connection that acts on us beyond our current level of awareness, which perceives through an egoistic and divisive lens. It is no matter of religion, but a realization that reality’s governing force is singular, and we accordingly need to stand united before it as one.
Precisely in our trying times, we are in need for an expansion of consciousness to let the upper force of love and bestowal into our lives. We need to raise the pain and anguish that erupts in so many people in such times to the upper force, and wish for it to mend our torn relations, and draw us closer together. We must seek to hold each other close to our hearts, not solely in times of war, but as an enduring duty.
We are a nation established not on a biological foundation, but on a spiritual-ideological one: "Love your neighbor as yourself." That is, we were people from all around ancient Babylon who felt a problem with living our lives solely according to competitive-materialistic ideals and sought for a higher truth to our existence, which we revealed as a higher force of love, bestowal and connection that united us above our divisive drives. That is why we cannot remain divided without suffering from our separation.
Our mission to unite above our divisions is constant, because divisive egoistic desires constantly surface within us, driving us apart. Therefore, much like a diligent student who finds new homework awaiting them each day, we should not accumulate any more overdue assignments that end up exploding in our faces, pressuring us into critical situations such as the one we now find before us. Instead, we should hurry up and correct our hearts to favor unity “as one man with one heart” above our divisions.
Nice beard ali
Thank you bro for this video.
Guys, discover the real Iran 🇮🇷 with our channel
Can you please do a Greenlandic video if possible?
Could you tell us who the vikings were?
Can you do Mexican's next.
Scandinavian & Iranian
Sir are pashtoons really 5000-6000 years old tribes.
Persians used to deposit their Greek prisoners out there, in their (then) farthest reaches of their empire. That's why they have some northern Mediterranean features like blue or grey eyes.
What? aren't Greeks mostly brown eyed/haired, are you high? also can you describe the Indo-Iranian language family
@@Yasa5na You are not well educated. Alpine areas down to Greece have an abundance of blue-eyed people. Alexander the Great was described by Greek historian Arrian as having "one eye dark as the night and one blue as the sky". Northern Italians today have many blue-eyed people.
@@Zuckerpuppekopf remember the Slavics and Barbarians Huns Scythians Goths who ruled over the Mediterraneans lol
@@Zuckerpuppekopf Arya doesn't mean blue eye and blond hair, you don't have any idea about modern Arya people ( Indo-Aryans and Iranics ).
@@Yasa5na iranics are brown people completely different phenotype in face and body than europeans u will never be closely related to europeans you are mostly south asian looking