The Great Invasions of Napoleon and Hitler into Russia 1812/1941 | Differences and Similarities
Вставка
- Опубліковано 5 чер 2024
- What differences were there between Hitler's and Napoleon's invasion of Russia? Did they commit similar acts? Why did each of them fail? Did the Germans try to correct Napoleon's mistakes? At the end of June 1812 and 1941, two large armies invaded Russia. The first was French and the second was German. Next in this program, we are going to analyze the main differences and similarities that both attacks had.
👉👉Do you want to support the channel? You just have to watch another video. This will help You Tube to recommend them more to new users.
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
🔴📣Other videos of interest:
- ✅ The Wehrmacht Assaults the Soviet Union | Guderian's Frantic Race to Moscow (Complete) • The Wehrmacht Assaults...
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
💲Supports the channel:
🟠Support the channel by becoming a member, and enjoy exclusive benefits!
/ @waracademy128
Paypal: www.paypal.com/paypalme/quien...
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
🦅 Social networks
Twitter: / belicasque
/ historiasbelicasoficial
00:00 Introduction
01:10 Meeting Hitler and Napoleon
01:54 1- The Plan
03:05 2- The Date
05:00 3- Army, Morale, and Generals
07:10 4- The Strategy and its result
10:24 Scorched Earth? - Розваги
Stalin couldn't depend on one winter driving the Germans out of the Soviet Union as the Czar could do in 1812. Very interesting video!
Ty
winter didn't drive out napoleon they knew they were lost just before winter happened
No, Moscow was not devastated before the arrival of Napoleon. The city was devasted after his arrival by the russian prisoners who were freed by the russian authorities before the arrival of Napoleon.
Ha ha
"Those who failed to learn from history is bound to repeat it"-Winston Churchill
After Gallipoli he’s lucky he didn’t get busted down to cleaning heads on ships.
@@nhmooytis7058that does not change the quote anyway. Forgot history at your peril.
France was spared from russian wrath. Germany wasn't. That's the main difference.
The Cossack had occupied Paris in the year of 1814 (Victor Hugo, who was 12 years then, had written about his reflections when he saw them... He said they were full of awe on seeing Paris (La Ville des Lumiéres! 😂😂😂))...
Eighty years later we can discuss the war knowing all the information from both sides. They didn’t have that luxury.
It was an informative historical coverage video about two different military campaigns in two different times, in two different technological level capacities.(Sir) your comparison narration was a great introduction .thank you (🙏 war academy) channel for sharing
Operation Barbarossa - the invasion named after the Holy Roman emperor that fell off his horse and drowned.
Friedrich Barbarossa never died according to legend, his spirit laid dormant at the foot of the mountains in southern Germany, waiting to be unleashed………..
Before he drowned (by luck/divine protection), he won many battles and tried to transform the Holy Roman Empire from a Christian state to a German state.
German Army Group Center used the very same roads that Napoleon used.
Great video, thanks👍
Great video idea man thanks
Very good video
Russia is the real Graveyard of Empires 😎
Good history Channel
One thing, you forgot to mention is that the Soviet Union's industries were all safe in the Far East, beyond the Ural Mountains and out of reach for the German bombers.
As a result, the Soviet factories were cranking out tanks, artillery guns, planes, ammunition etc.
This insane industrial output, in combination with the massive armies that the Soviets could muster and replenish their huge loses, eventually won.
There's a report from a German Panzer commander from the Battle of Kursk, where he said that during the first day, they destroyed almost 100 Soviet tanks.
They thought that they had already won, but the next day, the Soviet tanks kept coming and coming in waves. And keep in mind: the Soviet had several divisions who were kept in reserve and didn't get a chance to fight there!
Now add to that also the equally strong industrial & military might of the USA and you can see, that Nazi Germany never stood a chance.
Yeah truth is when the enemy can outproduce and out supply and out man in wars of attrition there is no chance all together!!!
You completely forgot a very important thing. The entire military industry of Conquered Europe worked for Germany. The Czechoslovakian Skoda factories alone produced three times more tanks for Hitler than all the tank factories in England. From the French who lost the war, Germany received 7000 serviceable tanks and 3000 combat aircraft + ammunition which was enough for ten years of continuous war. The Russians turned out to be stubborn and hardy fighters - these qualities destroyed both Napoleon and Hitler.
@@captderichelieu2280 Well what about the raw materials to run everything. Making tanks does not help much if there are no people to man them nor any fuel, oil etc.
@@donaldlyons17 Until mid-1945, Germany had no problems with recruiting an army and resources for the military industry. More than three million Europeans from conquered countries served in the German army. In addition, Hungary Italy Romania Spain Croatia fought on the side of Germany - their combat units amounted to 1.5 million soldiers fought with the Russians on the eastern front. Now about the military industry. Iron ore and rare earth metals were imported in a continuous stream from Sweden. Through Argentina and Spain, the Germans received aviation gasoline and spare parts for Ford cars directly from American companies. By the way, by the beginning of the Second World War in 1939, the number of Ford cars of various models amounted to 70 percent of all cars in the German army,.....
@@captderichelieu2280 Yeah but look at the allies stats. They had both more resources combined AND more people AND the ability to replace greater numbers of losses!!!!
RIP heiliges Deutschland ❤
There I nothing holy about Hitler and Nazism. Pure and simple minded evil.
Das versteht der Spanier nicht!
@@terraflow__bryanburdo4547
Es gibt mehr als 12 installierte Jahre! Geh lernen!
Gute Besserung 🤔@@unterdeneichen1913
so ist es 👍@@rigasarzemnieks4230
Good video! Keep going. The German side/strategy is in some battles is not well known.
Napoleon never wanted to go to Moscow. He intended to fight and win a large battle within 50 or so miles inside of Russia. Just bad luck Napoleon barely missed encountering Alexander's group.
Hitler's original plan was to go through Ukraine and to the Caucasus, but Halder and his cronies altered the plan to go mostly towards Moscow. Hitler's generals betrayed him and wasted precious fuel in the process trying to get Moscow and Leningrad. Failing to get Moscow, Leningrad, and the Caucasus oil.
If Germany would have taken Moscow it would have been a repeat of 1812 despite the railroads they would have been sabotaged and waiting for that peace deal which was never going to come if the soldiers didn’t push them back the winter would have.
2:43 Commudus the merciful 😅
LOVE FROM INDIA
Waiting to see The Joker as Nappy.😅
Hoping for Napoleonic era context.
No, not on the same day. Nopoleon invaded on 24th of June, not on 22nd.
Und Napoleon ging nach Moskau, was nicht Hauptstadt war. ;)
Napoleon tried again a Adolf Hitler, both failed, now Adolf Hitler is back and his name is Vladimir Putin...nuff said
You forgot the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth taking Moscow and occupying it for two years.
But then they got driven out of Moscow and from there the Poles began to get defeated multiple times
Goebbels and Hitler had little or no knowledge of strategy and tactics.
Spaniards are smart people
hitler's commanders were about to win at kursk but hitler called it off
No they were not about to win Kursk, no matter what revisionists tell you. It had become a battle of attrition, because the northern and southern wehrmacht forces didn't progress according to plan. Yes, the southern pincers made some good advances, but the Soviets had more reserves and not being able to link up with the northern pincer would have got the southern pincer cut off and surrounded instead. The North Africa debacle just gave Hitler a good reason to withdraw from another possible Stalingrad.
Wer bezahlte Hitlers Krieg?
😂😂😂😂
Nazis neva had a chance at kursk.
They were soundly defeated.
Amazing to me that someone can be this misinformed
Another difference: Hitler did not want to invade Moscow. He wanted to invade the Caucasus, but the generals refused and insisted on invading Moscow.
🇷🇺 vs. Napoleon/Hitler 2:0
It's not "Jawdel". Jodl's name was pronounced more like "Yodel". You butcher other German pronunciations.
THE MORAL OF THE STORY IS THAT IF YOU WANT TO INVADE DO IT FROM THE EAST LIKE THE MONGOLS DID. DO NOT INVADE FROM THE WEST.
When Mongols invaded Russia didn’t exist
russia if attacked from the east would fall
Yh like the Japanese tried 😂😂
We saw it at Khalkhin Gol.
@@joselugo4536 indeed the Japanese got soundly defeated by the Russians and Mongols , Japan never bothered Russia again 😂😂
@@JDDC-tq7qm Well now, Zhukov after the II World War said it was easier defeating the Germans...as the Japanese were culturally unable to surrender.
@@joselugo4536 yes Japan were the last axis force to surrender but Japan got decimated at Khalkhin Gol they were forced to sign a neutral pact afterwards and Japan left Russia alone even after German which was Japan ally never tried
You forgot something very important ; Napoleon it was in Moscow ! He defeated russians ! But it wasn't prepared to continue in winter ,and was obligated to witdraw.
Napoleon arrived in Moscow with 130,000 soldiers out of 500,000, the Russians lost 50-60 thousand, is this a victory?
@@gokhanylmaz8514 as long the russians witdraw and they was beated by french army ,yes. Is a victory for Napoleon. Only the winter was the real enemy . And if we talking about famous russian army , also russians lost în front of japanese army in 1905 . The same in front of turkish army ,1917-1918. Also in front of finish army , 1939 -1940. And including german army , 1941 - 1942. Only the winter and large number of soldiers saved russia all the time . Nothing more. Even the afgans resisted in front of russians. And today ukrainians .
@@kniespel6243Germany's non-combat losses (weather, accident) were only 9% according to statistics. This means that 91% is a consequence of exposure to the Red Army. The German Barbarossa plan was violated already during the battle for Smolensk.
@@gokhanylmaz8514 yes,it is. As long Napoleon was in Moscow and conquer a lot of teritorry. And btw, winter killed french soldiers ,not russians.