Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.

MM88: rectangular contour integration

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 лют 2022

КОМЕНТАРІ • 19

  • @yaozhang1687
    @yaozhang1687 15 днів тому +1

    Obviously parameter a cannot equals or less than zero. When a=0, lim x→-∞ e^ax/1+e^x = 1; When a

    • @DR_VIV
      @DR_VIV  15 днів тому

      Good answer!

  • @jwkim4428
    @jwkim4428 Місяць тому +1

    Eve if a is negative, integrand is positive. So the integral over real axis must be positive, but your answer may be negative for negative a.

    • @DR_VIV
      @DR_VIV  Місяць тому

      You are correct, of course. I should have put absolute value signs around ‘a’

  • @hirakJR
    @hirakJR Рік тому +4

    Handwriting 👌

  • @ben34256
    @ben34256 4 місяці тому +1

    8:42 I don't think the denominator is correct here. It should be |1+exp(R)exp(iy)|. As |z|/|1+z| >= |z|(1/(1+|z|)) not greater than or equal.

    • @DR_VIV
      @DR_VIV  4 місяці тому +1

      You are correct, of course… the bound should still work out…. If one uses the minimum value in the denominator, which would be absolute value of R minus 1.

  • @zinzhao8231
    @zinzhao8231 Рік тому +1

    beautiful problem!

  • @Thebiggame-dc8ek
    @Thebiggame-dc8ek Рік тому

    Thank you very much. But I wonder what about taking the contour at y below the pole, for example at y=i*pi/2I, then the integral will be equal to zero, why this result can't be true? and how we know if we include more poles the result won't change like when no pole were involved?
    I appreciate if you explain it to me. Much thanks.

    • @DR_VIV
      @DR_VIV  Рік тому

      Our ultimate aim is to evaluate the integral on the real line… that aim must not be lost sight of in our choice (choices) of the contour, of which as you point out, there are infinitely many. But all of them must involve the real axis or as you point out you will get zero answer by Cauchy theorem

  • @igorlimarochaazevedo5536
    @igorlimarochaazevedo5536 Рік тому

    Why did you subtracted 1 in one of the last equations of the resolution --> 1 - e^2(2pia)?

    • @DR_VIV
      @DR_VIV  Рік тому

      That came from gathering the terms of the computation from the previous steps. It is not 1 by itself but 1 multiplied by the value of the integral we seek. So it is a common factor.

  • @Dedicate25
    @Dedicate25 7 місяців тому

    Please tell me the name of that pen!!

    • @DR_VIV
      @DR_VIV  7 місяців тому

      Pen that Video begins with is Dani trio tosca in mottled green hard rubber, fitted with a factory stub nib.

    • @Dedicate25
      @Dedicate25 7 місяців тому

      @@DR_VIV Thank you sir

  • @kalaivani.kkannan3517
    @kalaivani.kkannan3517 6 місяців тому

    Why take 2pi , sir

    • @DR_VIV
      @DR_VIV  6 місяців тому

      Any other value may also be used.

    • @kalaivani.kkannan3517
      @kalaivani.kkannan3517 6 місяців тому

      thankyou sir, i thought 2*pi*i is periodic value for e^z, @@DR_VIV