Overweight & Late: Russia's MC-21 Expected To Be 6 Tons Heavier

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 вер 2024
  • In an alternative reality, with a massive production backlog and Boeing in crisis, now could have been a great time for Russia's domestic airliners to capture some of Airbus and Boeing's short-haul markets. But this is not another reality, and for over two years, Russia's domestic airliner production has been at a complete standstill. It is now estimated that when Russia's Yakovlev MC-21 finally enters service, it will be almost 6 tons heavier - with a shorter range and a lower capacity than planned.
    Article: simpleflying.c...
    Russian Aviation playlist: • Russian Aviation
    ------------
    Our Social Media:
    / simpleflyingnews
    / simple_flying
    / simpleflyingnews
    Our Website
    simpleflying.com/
    For copyright matters please contact us at: legal@valnetinc.com

КОМЕНТАРІ • 154

  • @Iftahmd
    @Iftahmd 3 місяці тому +25

    MC-21-300's maximum take-off weight is 79,250 kg, compared to A320's maximum take-off weight of 78,000 kg. However, it can carry more payload of 22,600 kg, compared to A320's 19,900 kg. The MC-21-300 can carry 181 passengers, compared to the A320's 140 passengers. This means the engine of MC-21 has more fuel economy than that of the A320's. So, this video is full of lies.

    • @Fred-gc9qt
      @Fred-gc9qt 2 місяці тому

      You are full of russian propaganda

    • @jinx-shorts
      @jinx-shorts Місяць тому +1

      Yeah i know right but im surprised many people actually believe what Simple flight is talking about.

    • @Afghanistan_123
      @Afghanistan_123 Місяць тому

      half of the information is from Wikipedia. the takeoff weight of the MS-21 was increased to 85,000 kg. it is not entirely correct to compare the MS-21 with the A320, in terms of capacity, fuel consumption and takeoff weight it is more suitable for the Boeing 737-900er. now the aircraft is made entirely of Russian parts. the wings and engines are already ready, but due to different parts the characteristics may change, and those characteristics that are in Wikipedia are the characteristics of a semi-foreign airliner

    • @indrekkpringi
      @indrekkpringi Місяць тому

      Exactly what I was going to say.
      Western media is so full of lies concerning Russia nobody should believe they say about that country.

    • @hidahidayat1407
      @hidahidayat1407 7 днів тому

      Propaganda barat... Mereka takut mc21 mengalahkan Boeing dan airbus yang penuh dengan kelicikan

  • @GalootWrangler
    @GalootWrangler 4 місяці тому +61

    “Our Soviet transistor radios are largest in the world!”

    • @maxart3392
      @maxart3392 4 місяці тому +14

      "Soviet watches are much better than the Swiss ones: cheaper and much faster".

    • @david_fisher
      @david_fisher 4 місяці тому +9

      Reminds me of the time the Soviets announced that they'd built the world's largest microchip.

  • @bearabletable7527
    @bearabletable7527 4 місяці тому +22

    Rather fly this plane than Boeing 737 MAX

  • @bradlemmond
    @bradlemmond 4 місяці тому +60

    _Overweight & Late_ will be the name of my memoirs!

    • @frankpinmtl
      @frankpinmtl 4 місяці тому +5

      Sounds like the kind of girl you don't want to date

  • @overvieweffect9034
    @overvieweffect9034 4 місяці тому +51

    that's significantly less range than most of embraer's e series, for reference

  • @thexchox1554
    @thexchox1554 Місяць тому +4

    There is so much false information in this video I have no idea where to start.

  • @sundragon7703
    @sundragon7703 4 місяці тому +33

    At least the MC-21's cockpit windows are big

    • @kaboonali5466
      @kaboonali5466 2 місяці тому

      And also safer than Boeing 😂

  • @42krikkit
    @42krikkit 4 місяці тому +22

    What goes around, comes around.

  • @wickedpawn5437
    @wickedpawn5437 4 місяці тому +16

    6 tons heavier !! OMG !!

    • @busybillyb33
      @busybillyb33 4 місяці тому

      That's like 60-100 pax right?

    • @BGTech1
      @BGTech1 4 місяці тому

      12,000 lbs

    • @zahrans
      @zahrans 4 місяці тому +2

      That's like 10 standard size Americans...

    • @НиколайЗинин-п1х
      @НиколайЗинин-п1х 2 місяці тому

      6 tons of excess would not be enough to write 20 tons at once, such a lie would be brighter, where did such information come from, they also said about vaccines from China and Russia that they were bad. Then it turned out that they were lying, they themselves admitted it doesn’t matter how many people died without them.

    • @SoulRocketMan
      @SoulRocketMan Місяць тому +1

      Nah he is lying coz he is jealous

  • @Cninnamon_roll
    @Cninnamon_roll 4 місяці тому +42

    Not like any airline is gonna buy it anyways 😂

    • @tanman49
      @tanman49 4 місяці тому +2

      Yes they are in too deep with the other manufacturers and number 2 those other planes especially Airbus provides to many competitive edges and support systems to consider buying that plane.

    • @sayorancode
      @sayorancode 4 місяці тому +12

      i think russian airlines might buy it. considering the sanctions make it difficult for them to get better planes

    • @electro_sykes
      @electro_sykes 4 місяці тому

      I think Russian Airlines like Aeroflot may have to because they may not have any other choice other then the C919 because of sanctions from the west.

    • @aliasrandom9241
      @aliasrandom9241 3 місяці тому +2

      russkys need like 500 new planes by the mid 30-s

    • @موسى_7
      @موسى_7 3 місяці тому

      . Cuba
      . Iran
      . North Korea
      . China
      . Every 3rd world country which isn't a dictatorship backed by Europe and the US

  • @arienoordzij3823
    @arienoordzij3823 4 місяці тому +28

    Maybe they can refurbish the Tu-134 and 154, and Ill -62 😁😁 Only for Russian airspace ofcourse!!

  • @MajTJKing
    @MajTJKing 4 місяці тому +9

    Regardless of sanctions, with the PW1000G, it would probably been grounded anyway,

    • @tanman49
      @tanman49 4 місяці тому

      Yes agreed. Sometimes all it takes is one major part, and it renders the whole thing useless and that’s the pw1000G. Everybody knows how to work with and fix that engine to perfection. That’s savings right there. So without that that plane is ground. They didn’t need to take away 40% of the parts. But just thst

    • @SoulRocketMan
      @SoulRocketMan Місяць тому

      LOL Delusional brainwashed western people. Wake up

  • @carlosgamarrath244
    @carlosgamarrath244 3 місяці тому +4

    I must check everything myself coz i don't trust 100 % everything

  • @goodkingkarlos
    @goodkingkarlos 4 місяці тому +25

    I worked on the pratt and whitney nacelle😢

  • @oyasumidream
    @oyasumidream 4 місяці тому +28

    MC-21's market performance might be quite terrible because of Russian Invasion of Ukraine.

    • @daglaroglucan
      @daglaroglucan 4 місяці тому +7

      Wont all Russian have to buy this plane eventually because of sanctions

    • @tanman49
      @tanman49 4 місяці тому

      I think they would have bought it anyway even without the invasion because no import duties

    • @canadian_aviation
      @canadian_aviation 4 місяці тому +1

      not only that but it has no winglets

    • @НиколайЗинин-п1х
      @НиколайЗинин-п1х 2 місяці тому

      @@canadian_aviation Due to the largest wing aspect ratio in this class of aircraft, there was not enough space for the winglets.

    • @canadian_aviation
      @canadian_aviation Місяць тому

      @@НиколайЗинин-п1х raked wingtips exist

  • @WingWarnings
    @WingWarnings 4 місяці тому +5

    Nice coverage

  • @PakaBubi
    @PakaBubi 4 місяці тому +11

    Russia 🤣

  • @jjiglesiasg
    @jjiglesiasg 4 місяці тому +32

    What Russian made engine could replace the PW1000G engine? Russification in the name do not mean it will work in the real life, 40% of western components could not be replaced by local ones, perhaps yes momentarily in form and function but not in airworthiness and reliability. This project seems to be doomed.

    • @gonzalolarrubia
      @gonzalolarrubia 4 місяці тому +13

      The Aviadvigatel PD-14 was also developed to power the MC-21

    • @tanman49
      @tanman49 4 місяці тому

      All manufacturers out source to save money. But I guess they messed up by doing that. Now they put them in the choke hold for it.

    • @gerryattrickbiker
      @gerryattrickbiker 4 місяці тому

      Perhaps Lada could build some engines

    • @marceloribb
      @marceloribb 4 місяці тому

      @@gerryattrickbiker 😂

    • @aliasrandom9241
      @aliasrandom9241 3 місяці тому

      who needs engines when you can use thermal updrafts?

  • @ioannisdimakis7460
    @ioannisdimakis7460 2 місяці тому +1

    I am not specialist but this video seems biased. Russia was building airplanes for a long time and with good performance. Have they suddenly forgoten how they can make them again? Propably not so nice,noisier ,with not so good consumption . But for strategic reasons they will build them.And they have a big country to serve. The same with China. So the future for airbus and boing will be not easy.

  • @canadian_aviation
    @canadian_aviation 4 місяці тому +13

    no winglets in 2024 is crazy ☠🙏

    • @davidkavanagh189
      @davidkavanagh189 4 місяці тому +9

      So the 777 and 787 are crazy then are they?

    • @PixelTrain1
      @PixelTrain1 4 місяці тому +2

      its more about the wing design then the winglets

    • @stabilo3170
      @stabilo3170 3 місяці тому +1

      @@davidkavanagh189 The 777 & 787 have raked wingtips, not the MC-21.

    • @Afghanistan_123
      @Afghanistan_123 Місяць тому

      on MS 21 the wing is extended, which also saves fuel. with opening, the wing extension saves fuel (by the way, this is done on the Boeing 787)

    • @stabilo3170
      @stabilo3170 Місяць тому

      @@Afghanistan_123 But you need to balance with the increased weight due to the structural reinforcement to allow the high wingflex.

  • @hg6996
    @hg6996 4 місяці тому +4

    With Russia unable to produce ball bearings for their rail wagons I don't think they can produce this plane.
    Way too many western components would have to be parallel imported.

    • @НиколайЗинин-п1х
      @НиколайЗинин-п1х 2 місяці тому

      Since the beginning of 2023, the shortage of cassette bearings and components for them has actually been leveled: suppliers from friendly countries have been admitted and projects have been implemented to localize production in Russia. This had a positive effect on the volume of repairs of cars with an axle load of 25 tf and on the production of new cars.

  • @stankythecat6735
    @stankythecat6735 4 місяці тому +12

    This is why BRICs is nothing to worry about

    • @tanman49
      @tanman49 4 місяці тому

      Yes they gotta obey sanctions to. They are something but they gotta obey sanctions to. They revolt from time to time but they gotta obey sanctions.

    • @sayorancode
      @sayorancode 4 місяці тому +1

      on the other hand BRICKS are

    • @dzonikg
      @dzonikg 2 місяці тому

      Musk was laughing on BYD just few years ago ,he dont laugh now

    • @stankythecat6735
      @stankythecat6735 2 місяці тому

      @@dzonikg LOL…. Now everyone is laughing.

    • @galimbertino4939
      @galimbertino4939 9 днів тому

      Don't worry, stay arrogant otherwise you might react and improve.

  • @adamciesielski5889
    @adamciesielski5889 2 місяці тому

    Thank you very much for this report.
    The Russian production and development of passanger aircrafts has never had smooth continuity. In other words, their models always trail western solutions and ideas, but even when they introduce foreign designs into actual production they cannot, somehow, carry on with the cooperation or with bettering the acquired technology.
    The westerners will never understand Russians' state of mind, and you should never present any Russian technology without investigating their state of mind. When in the west the better product is sought after, in Russia the Russian product is better, irrespectively of its performance, economy, comfort etc. Especially now, when Russia runs a war economy and Soviet-style propaganda rules the airwaves and satellites.
    I believe your report 100%. The final Yakovlev MC-21 will be heavier, less economical, shorter in range, less comfortable and louder than the initial specifications state. It's a propaganda airplane, like Tu-144. Russian airlines order that plane because they are forced to do so by politburo and not by their spending-gain sheets. Those airlines will be heavily supported by government anyway, as long as they promote Russians airplanes.
    You will never then acquire the actual performance or sales data on that aircraft.

  • @АндроидКиткат
    @АндроидКиткат 4 місяці тому +15

    I think Russia will overcome those hardships

    • @chiad25
      @chiad25 4 місяці тому +11

      Of course they will ... In 2064.

    • @B737900ER
      @B737900ER 4 місяці тому

      Lol 😂

    • @sayorancode
      @sayorancode 4 місяці тому

      @@chiad25 they will .. eventually

    • @eotlati1763
      @eotlati1763 2 місяці тому

      This is russophobia channel paid to spew propaganda. Loser.

  • @ized_4585
    @ized_4585 4 місяці тому +6

    why doesnt it have winglets?

    • @Yassified3425
      @Yassified3425 4 місяці тому +14

      Because they don't have any homemade winglet designs.

    • @AnotherPointOfView944
      @AnotherPointOfView944 4 місяці тому +7

      Maybe there is no Russian word for that.

    • @TheMaartian
      @TheMaartian 4 місяці тому +5

      Because KFC chicken winglets are no longer available due to sanctions. 😂

    • @arienoordzij3823
      @arienoordzij3823 4 місяці тому +2

      Because of weight problems! 😁😁

    • @kingsharkoon
      @kingsharkoon 4 місяці тому +3

      ​@@Yassified3425 idk what this is supposed to mean but the SSJ 100 has winglets and the Tu-204 and the Il-96 have them, too.

  • @mrrolandlawrence
    @mrrolandlawrence 2 місяці тому

    1:40 thats not true. they certified the MC21 to have both russian and western engines. the idea was to sell on the foreign market and saw that some foreign carriers would prefer western engines. there was always going to be a PD18 version from the outset. if batch 1 really are 6 tons heavier - then thats 6 tons of optimisations to come. airbus do it all the time. what russia needs is numbers. 6 tons heavier or not - they need 100s of them asap. really they should be focused on upgrades for the tu214. that is mostly russian anyway. some new engines and better wings would improve things greatly and its also in production. for reasons i dont understand - russia is putting lots of money into the 4 engine il-96 from the 1980s.

  • @swanvictor887
    @swanvictor887 4 місяці тому +18

    of course all production has ceased...al the factory workers are in the army now...mostly dead....

  • @ernestmcauley5556
    @ernestmcauley5556 4 місяці тому +6

    Author needs to stop eating sour grapes

  • @ThePearson1945
    @ThePearson1945 4 місяці тому +1

    Airbus A320 Neo series 👌

  • @Tushka154
    @Tushka154 4 місяці тому +2

    What is up with the narration again?!
    - YAKOVLEV MC21
    - M21
    etc…

    • @eotlati1763
      @eotlati1763 2 місяці тому

      They are paid channel to spew anti-russia video. Useless British.

  •  4 місяці тому +6

    A321 from wish

  • @hj8272
    @hj8272 16 днів тому

    How many of those wheelbarrows were ordered by other than russian airlines? And I'm talking about civilized world, not third world.

  • @Tina-d8f
    @Tina-d8f 4 місяці тому +1

    Interesting.

  • @cheeseburgersarecool6600
    @cheeseburgersarecool6600 23 дні тому

    probably won't be that bad . at least in the long term

  • @lgerigk
    @lgerigk 4 місяці тому +1

    Even if it gets certified, production rate will be like 10 per year or so, nothing relevant. Most likely they will go the way of Iran, acquire some planes on the second hand market, Turkey comes to mind, or get some C919 from China.

  • @cabottaxi
    @cabottaxi 4 місяці тому +2

    White elephant

  • @markwils5042
    @markwils5042 4 місяці тому +1

    The range is not marketable. Dead on Arrival !!!

  • @l0z586
    @l0z586 4 місяці тому +6

    Not looking good

  • @dibilidiot604
    @dibilidiot604 4 місяці тому

    Oh, 😟 no. Why?😞

  • @tirsofelipeduranmendoza5432
    @tirsofelipeduranmendoza5432 Місяць тому

    Its kinda funny were u get the info off the Russian plane. But a couldnt find ANYTHING related to Russian sources, not even an article from Rostec itself so were i can read about it. So theres to options here. Or u lying Or ur speculating about it becose off sanctions

  • @EuropeanRailfanAlt
    @EuropeanRailfanAlt 4 місяці тому +9

    "Still better than the MAX" 🤓

    • @arienoordzij3823
      @arienoordzij3823 4 місяці тому +2

      Yes, you are right, because the MC-21 doesn't fly! So nothing can happen! 😁😂🤣

    • @tanman49
      @tanman49 4 місяці тому

      Haha

    • @tanman49
      @tanman49 4 місяці тому

      @@arienoordzij3823haha I am weak

    • @sayorancode
      @sayorancode 4 місяці тому

      @@arienoordzij3823 yes that is why i only fly mc-21 today (i don't fly today)

  • @lifetimevic
    @lifetimevic 4 місяці тому

    Who would want to fly in this heap????

  • @maxximus1702
    @maxximus1702 4 місяці тому +4

    Still better than Boeing

    • @mohwybar5832
      @mohwybar5832 4 місяці тому +3

      boeing makes planes. These people dont

  • @Hanginthere4100
    @Hanginthere4100 4 місяці тому

    Trusted than chinese comac

  • @Afghanistan_123
    @Afghanistan_123 Місяць тому

    Well, Kommersant can have assumptions, yes, everyone can have assumptions. But these are just versions and guesses, why are you, like a flock of sheep, starting to perceive this not as guesses, but as the truth?

  • @rudivandoornegat2371
    @rudivandoornegat2371 4 місяці тому +1

    If only Airbus could put the MC-21's nose on the future aircraft of the Airbus A320 family.

  • @mnchai1
    @mnchai1 4 місяці тому

    I think it’s dead product with the reduced specs.they may have to weigh everyone now to reduce the weight.😮

  • @magnussheep
    @magnussheep 4 місяці тому +2

    Seems like they cant succeed anymore 😔

  • @ralphvanthoff
    @ralphvanthoff 4 місяці тому +5

    Crippling sanctions LMAO 😂😂😂

    • @Hhutuber
      @Hhutuber 4 місяці тому +10

      Yeah, in this case they are. This product is dead. Countries that can't or don't want Western planes will buy Chinese, even through Russia has more experience building airlines.

    • @dzonikg
      @dzonikg 2 місяці тому +1

      @@Hhutuber Russia will eventuality replaces missing component with Chines ,Russia was totaly lazy from 1991-2022 ,they had huge export from fossil fuel so they just import everything and forgot to build stuff ,and old engineers died or are are retired now

  • @stuffifollow
    @stuffifollow 4 місяці тому +1

    Oh welll... lmao 😂😂😂😂😅😅😅

  • @ialexandr
    @ialexandr 4 місяці тому +2

    hello🥶

  • @mariolarouche5318
    @mariolarouche5318 4 місяці тому

    Back to the ussr😅

  • @billmeldrum2509
    @billmeldrum2509 4 місяці тому +2

    Let’s hope never!

  • @ackack612
    @ackack612 4 місяці тому

    Who cares?

  • @Scalabrio
    @Scalabrio 4 місяці тому +1

    They even stole the livery from Airbus 🤣

  • @rajaampattravel
    @rajaampattravel 4 місяці тому

    waw

  • @maxbide1404
    @maxbide1404 18 днів тому

    Fake news

  • @GeflyLW
    @GeflyLW 4 місяці тому +2

    Russia

  • @Archduke17
    @Archduke17 4 місяці тому +3

    😂

  • @alexlo7708
    @alexlo7708 Місяць тому

    This news seems to air false information. Even old model Tu214 can fly longer than this news quoted, why MC21 that is the newest tech model, couldn't do.