If you enjoy the content, please consider becoming a Patreon member to support my channel. Producing content of this caliber would be nearly impossible without your help. Thank you.
I agree, but wasn't sure about the audience. I had to make sure if my accent was a really a big deal or not. It's actually nice to see people caring for human touch/authenticity. I'll review all the comments on this. Please keep sharing your thoughts, thank you.
The people that will complain, will complain regardless, they can't be satisfied as they're so very unhappy with themselves. Don't let those people cause you to violate yourself and your authenticity, pity them, keep yourself whole.❤
I just found your channel (this video popped up via the almighty algorithm!) and immediately checked out another video after reading this comment. Absolutely use your voice! I can't imagine why anyone would complain about your accent-- any excuse must be unjustifiable.
@@DisculogicNo way! Please tell me you didn’t do this swap for the dead AI narration because of some commentary trolls! Trolls are an unavoidable part of any online content. Just like bugs are a part of camping trips. You just deal with it. No matter what you create, you’ll have trolls typing their nasty little comments. It’s just the way it is.
I know, right! I got so accustomed to Arbi’s voice and accent and now this? I mean the content is still great and I love the thought provoking experience but I definitely preferred the original, living voice. It was what made Disculogic Disculogic.
Excellent video. But keep in mind that this is based on what we know from a 3rd dimensional point of view. We don't know what happens at the higher dimensions. Just as 2 dimensional beings would not know what is taking place in the 3rd dimension.
You are very kind to take the time to converse with me, and for that I am very grateful. Let me say something that seems pertinent to now. Thoughts and dreams can be like this visually chaotic and musically pleasant video you have presented here. Too complex to decipher overall, yet the resonance of the bowls are so pleasant to listen to. There is no meaning to the universe. To have a meaning is to have a thought. But we can’t attach to a thought. And if we try, we twirl in samsara. You are the answer. You don’t find an answer.
Beautifully inconceivable scenario! The ancient Hindu Rishis have anticipated similar time-space problems. They unequivocally taught that Consciousness precedes theoretical physics. The multiverses in which we are embedded as a “Dream”. They stated that While Consciousness is birthless and deathless, Universes come expand, contract and this pattern repeats as infinitum…illustrated as Vishnu (the sustainer) nourished by His umbilical connection to Brahma (Creator), and sleeping on an ocean imagined as coils of Siva (destroyer). When Vishnu awakens a new universe is born. Of course this scenario is entirely imaginary, but it serves as a prelude to modern Astrophysical phenomenal theory. Dr. Lee
Nice but that all just adds an extra layer of complexity. How would consciousness "precede" physics ? The word precede is time based and time is physics. So if you already have time then that is physics and that is before consciousness.
The probability that a Boltzmann brain never forms may tend toward zero, but there is still the possibility that it does not. Just as there is a possibility of a coin landing heads repeatedly over eternity. That possibility is as likely as any given sequence.
@@Disculogic Consider a Poisson distributed random variable X, where l is the average number of successes per unit time and t is the interval of time in question. Then P(X = 0) = exp(-lt) --> 0 as t --> infinity. So, t > -ln(e)/l for any e > 0 satisfies the requirements. But limit -ln(e)/l as e --> 0+ = +infinity. However, Nature does not admit of completed infinity. Therefore, e must never be 0, and t must be finite. Then P(X =0) > 0. Poisson is a good distribution for this, and even though we have assumed a constant rate, l, it is possible to be more general. But what we are trying to get at is the principle that time is never infinite and so the probability of the event that the Boltzmann Brain never forms is positive.
Furthermore, if we divide time into even segments and apply a uniform probability function to each segment regarding the chance if generating a Boltzmann Brain, we could look at sequences like FFFFFS..., or FFFFFF.... where P(F) >> P(S). Each sequence will have a zero probability of occurring theoretically in a completed infinity. Yet FFFFFF... would be more probable than any sequence containing S. Now if S terminated the sequence, P(F)^n >> P(F)^(n-1)P(S), so a sequence having no successes is still more likely. So, with completed infinity in mind, I think there is still a chance that a Boltzmann Brain would fail to materialize.
@@Disculogic My final argument: The claim that every possible entity will be accreted given "infinite" time is fallacious. Even though, theoretically, any sequence of successes and failures of the creation of a given entity tends toward zero probability, that does not mean that that sequence is impossible. So, the sequence of nothing but failures is also possible, and, in fact, more likely than any given sequence containing a success. It is also true that the amount of matter is finite, which means that the probabilities are not independent from one creation event to another of any given entity. So, it seems that the probability that every possible configuration of matter is accreted must be very near zero. Nevertheless, creation of Boltzmann Brains is the more likely outcome; however, if the brain were anything like ours, it would require what amounts to a body that can withstand the conditions of space. It would probably require oxygen and nutrients, heat and water. This would mean that it may require something like a planet of sufficient size to capture an atmosphere, and which is near a star to supply heat. But if this is a maximum entropy universe, could a sun be possible? But the very very low probability still could see infinitely many BBs over an unbounded span of time. If BBs require a planet for survival, then the BB mechanism would compete with the more likely mechanism posited for the creation of humans. If the planet formed and the BB some billions of years after, creatures might have formed "spontaneously" as they are posited to have done in Earth. The BB would then have to compete with these creatures for survival. Because they are not naturally adapted in most cases, the BB would lose the competition. But some would likely survive. Yet, I do think that if we look more at the specific requirements and the likely conditions of the universe, the more our notion of a BB will tend toward impossible.
Honestly if you think about Stuart Hameroff and Sir Roger Penrose, they believe thoughts travel back in time. Maybe neurons boltzmanned themselves into existence?
If I understand the BB correctly, it materializes instantly out of quantum field fluctuations. Two major problems I see. (1) Consciousness as we know it (as emergent from our brain) arise from the “need” to survive. All conscious organisms function to survive. That requires an effector system -motor functions - to acquire energy sources and protect against damage. That would be lacking in a BB. (2) Such a highely unlikely organization would require energy to maintain it’s structure. Where does that come from? It took 2.5 billion years for humans to develop, meaning to assemble the means to convert surrounding material to a form (e.g. glucose) that can be used to maintain it’s structure against entropy. Otherwise, the BB would not last long enough to have more than a few “thoughts”, much less a whole dream.
Thank you, and agreed on the voice. I received many complaints about my accent, so I thought maybe I should try another narrator and see how people respond.
This line of reasoning only serves to prop up material reality in contrast to what we all know intuitively. I am not my body nor do i exist in my mind. I can observe my own thoughts.
It's not that dry IMO, but I agree that the passion isn't there compared to my voice. I received many complaints about my accent, so I thought maybe I should try another narrator and see how people respond.
This theory (Bolzmann) its disturbingly depressing, if you think about it. Almost nothing at all, not even heath or any other meaningful energy interaction...WTF!!! The only "good" characteristic it has, is that even counsciousness doesn't exist and so, nobody would really be aware of it, hence if wouldn't really matter for us in any meaningful way, emotionally, physically or otherwise. ****In my opinion, our (we, the human species) knowledge about the universe at this "point in time" lack comprehensiveness, among other things and so it is highly unlikely for any of us to see the universe with its happenings beyond the tip of our nose, this being a very optimist outlook about our self-worth within these lines of thought. Surley it must be a quicker way to get where we need to be, as this scientifically "learning, applying, evaluating results and re-evaluating them, times and times again, etc" is a very, but very slow process when it comes to our life span and can yield many (all type ) errors on its way. Why shouldn't there be multiple paths to the same outcome, since one is possible?!!?! Who says there must be only one way to the result?!?!? 🤨🙂
Instant sub. Great vid! But yeh im new so saw this video first. Then read the accent comment and your other vids. Please use your voice ❤dont let trolls effect you
If you can get one Boltzmann of yourself , then you could get a lot more at different points in time. Since they are all "you" they would all be entangled with each other into a continuous experience of moments.
Years ago, I used to read kenneth Galbraith, especially the affluent society. If only they had listened then. The love of money is truly the root of all evil, just as it was 2000 years ago when first stated by the carpenter of Galilee. .
I feel like once space is spread out so far it will pop creating a new bubble. It will leave behind a cmb and down the road will be measured by another civilization. Who evolved and studied the stars. This is what sir roger penrose was explaing about his theory.
Ok so I collect these episodes because of the uniqueness and thought provoking content. The other great feature is narration of your own voice and accent that I grew accustomed to. This polished AI “smoothie” voice is just not it. I know it’s a bit more work on your part but please return to your own narration!
Isn't entropy the lack of unique data points. The second law is that everything gets cold eventually. By extension wouldn't that indicate that entropy is that everything moves toward sameness?
I like the deep feeling l get when l watch you're videos. You got talent for this! I wish you cloud make a video about god and deep ideas about that area.
Russel's teapot analysis is wrong. There is a probability of a teapot existing out in space. Russel's paradox is also solvable using superpositions. Just like Schrodinger's cat in a superposition of dead and alive. You can get a barber in a superposition of having shaved himself and not. This is why Godel and Turing are wrong also, they think in terms of Newtons classical world. Math has to be revamped and expressed with the reality of the quantum world from the git go.
I will love everything you do, but you must use your own voice. It’s perfect, it’s unique, part of your brand. You must absolutely go back to using it! 👍
Why would conciousness connect to a random ass brain in the nowhere. We are choosing earth because there is cool gravity here and other people too and we can learn easy stuff like morality and not being stupid. A good enough place for level 1 conciousness before being allowed to some galactic empire where if you cannot behave you could destroy an entire galaxy, not just planet.
I mentioned that theorists are always trying to come up with cosmological models that avoid Boltzmann brains. I agree that both BB & god are unfalsifiable hypotheses.
21:40 your contradicted yourself. You said complexity of experiences etc etc proves we aren't boltsman brains. No it doesn't, since you hypothesised the emergence of boltsman brain at random in infinite time and space universe. Each brain is as complex as universe itself. Who's to say universe isn't a brain to begin with anyway. Regardless, if brain appearing is considered not impossible in limitless universe, then you really have no good argument about life experience not being just product of such. And anyway, time only makes sense for observer. So up to the point of universe getting created, being it via evolution or spontaneously could very well be exactly the one and the same thing, only described from two different perspectives. For infinite time universe, our evolutionary existence in present universe is exactly just an instant. No matter how many billion exponential eons universe would exist in planetary, galactical order, all this time compared with infinity of endless cyclic universe is nothing more than an instant. Basic maths prove that. So with evidence we have - boltsman brain universe is one of most sophisticated view on existence and our lives. Any other theory could only be as likely as this, not surpassing it. Since your only way to prove to yourself you aren't just a brain in universe is when you die and find out. So there isn't no clever arguments here you can throw to prove anything otherwise to anyone since this is philosophical problem, not scientific. Since science can't observe beyond its own boundaries of existence....
And it's funny when you say false memories. How can memories be false if that's the only memories there exist. Hypothetically there isn't a better explanation to life than that it is alone and all stars galaxies, sciences only exist cause this lonely mind believes they exist. Not that any living being can be disproven of this since its unknown. If you knew, if boltsman knew then he wouldn't have to hypothesise. The fact you even debating this is because there isn't any better answer. Life is a mystery. Mystery in a sense that no living being while its alive could ever know if they even exist at all or not. You don't decide the rhythm of your breathing or when exactly will you wake up. If you wake up since statistically death is more likely while asleep than while awake. How would your brain would know that it died and never woke up. You wouldn't. Wherever cosmos conical randomness would throw your experience next week always remain a mystery to everyone.
"Who's to say universe isn't a brain to begin with anyway." sounds totally irrelevant. "For infinite time universe..." that's an assumption is cosmology, I went over it. "with evidence we have - boltsman brain universe is one of most sophisticated view on existence and our lives." No it isn't, and I discussed why.
@Disculogic is discussed why but arguments aren't tangible. Since universe is infinite, time is infinite, then as much as its probabilisticaly unlikely, its also inevitable consciousness would find itself appearing in physically constrained vessel of flesh and bone experience of what it appears life although as long as experience lasts, one would never know if all this real for whatever we think real is. It's impossible to rationally construct any arguments that would prove me being as real as you are. Meaning - if brain appearing is possibility then it's as likely as me being just some npc of cosmos while you are the only one real conscious player experiencing life whilst all else is just an illusion. Then you say its less likely which what annoyed me since it looks like you solved the riddle but then without any reasonable argument just state its unlikely. No. You were right the first time. Its more likely that than two conscious beings happening to inhabit same spot in universe at same time
@Disculogic as you said too- its very scary and gloomy, but logically it's consistent. Just because you scared of idea that consciousness is alone in universe doesn't allow you to make up irrational argument that it isn't the case
It's just annoying when you say something stupid every time you finish saying something smart. As if you forget what you just said moment ago. How can boltsman brain be less probable than evolutionary existence when you can easily think of them both as the same thing anyway. It is the same thing. Who throws those random particles into existence anyway. All this is a mystery for us to crack since we don't have tools to do so. So with so many unknowns, you can't reasonably justify the probability between apples and oranges. You just sound totally dumb when you finish segment on clever thought only to smash it with some dumb statement like this one where you comparing two things without having common frame of reference
First time seeing your channel-and even though 90% of my free time every single day is devoted to intense study of quantum mechanics-philosophy-an esoteric theories of reality -I’m amazed by the thought experiment I went through two minutes in (after having my brain broken for a moment going through a sudden existential crisis😂❤😮!)☝️🌞🪽😳🪽👍 9:00
If you enjoy the content, please consider becoming a Patreon member to support my channel. Producing content of this caliber would be nearly impossible without your help. Thank you.
Its not my problem
We need your narration back bro. The authenticity makes this channel special. Whoever was upset about your accent can kick rocks honestly.
I agree, but wasn't sure about the audience. I had to make sure if my accent was a really a big deal or not. It's actually nice to see people caring for human touch/authenticity. I'll review all the comments on this. Please keep sharing your thoughts, thank you.
I AGREE 💯💯💯💯
The people that will complain, will complain regardless, they can't be satisfied as they're so very unhappy with themselves. Don't let those people cause you to violate yourself and your authenticity, pity them, keep yourself whole.❤
I just found your channel (this video popped up via the almighty algorithm!) and immediately checked out another video after reading this comment.
Absolutely use your voice! I can't imagine why anyone would complain about your accent-- any excuse must be unjustifiable.
@@DisculogicNo way! Please tell me you didn’t do this swap for the dead AI narration because of some commentary trolls! Trolls are an unavoidable part of any online content. Just like bugs are a part of camping trips. You just deal with it. No matter what you create, you’ll have trolls typing their nasty little comments. It’s just the way it is.
This narration is fine, but your voice has always been one of the many things that makes this channel unique and amazing
Love to hear that. People have spoken. I’ll continue narrating myself. Thank you.
I know, right! I got so accustomed to Arbi’s voice and accent and now this? I mean the content is still great and I love the thought provoking experience but I definitely preferred the original, living voice. It was what made Disculogic Disculogic.
Excellent video. But keep in mind that this is based on what we know from a 3rd dimensional point of view. We don't know what happens at the higher dimensions. Just as 2 dimensional beings would not know what is taking place in the 3rd dimension.
You are very kind to take the time to converse with me, and for that I am very grateful.
Let me say something that seems pertinent to now.
Thoughts and dreams can be like this visually chaotic and musically pleasant video you have presented here.
Too complex to decipher overall, yet the resonance of the bowls are so pleasant to listen to.
There is no meaning to the universe. To have a meaning is to have a thought. But we can’t attach to a thought. And if we try, we twirl in samsara.
You are the answer. You don’t find an answer.
I love this! I wrote a scientific paper on Boltzmann Brains a year ago and which physicists would take this concept more seriously.
Seriously, seriously?
love these videos
Awesome!
Thank you for another stimulating video!
You're welcome.
Thank you for your hard work. It truly is appreciated. But hey man, you voice made these videos! Please bring it back.
My pleasure! My voice is coming back.
So we're all 1 billionth Morty trapped in Roy
I’m so happy the Boltzmann brain video is back
you’re my favorite channel
But I definitely prefer your actually voice for the narrations
Thank you, nice to hear that. Yes, looks like my accent wasn't that big of a deal. I'll narrate the next one.
Very well done, interesting content thoughtfully presented and narrated extremely well.👍
Thanks so much.
Beautifully inconceivable scenario! The ancient Hindu Rishis have anticipated similar time-space problems. They unequivocally taught that Consciousness precedes theoretical physics. The multiverses in which we are embedded as a “Dream”. They stated that While Consciousness is birthless and deathless, Universes come expand, contract and this pattern repeats as infinitum…illustrated as Vishnu (the sustainer) nourished by His umbilical connection to Brahma (Creator), and sleeping on an ocean imagined as coils of Siva (destroyer). When Vishnu awakens a new universe is born. Of course this scenario is entirely imaginary, but it serves as a prelude to modern Astrophysical phenomenal theory. Dr. Lee
Nice but that all just adds an extra layer of complexity. How would consciousness "precede" physics ? The word precede is time based and time is physics. So if you already have time then that is physics and that is before consciousness.
I love the closing music. It is like the ultimate truth in music form. 😊
We're in agreement on that 💫
The probability that a Boltzmann brain never forms may tend toward zero, but there is still the possibility that it does not. Just as there is a possibility of a coin landing heads repeatedly over eternity. That possibility is as likely as any given sequence.
I don't think that's how infinity (in this case infinite time) works.
@@Disculogic Consider a Poisson distributed random variable X, where l is the average number of successes per unit time and t is the interval of time in question. Then P(X = 0) = exp(-lt) --> 0 as t --> infinity. So, t > -ln(e)/l for any e > 0 satisfies the requirements. But limit -ln(e)/l as e --> 0+ = +infinity. However, Nature does not admit of completed infinity. Therefore, e must never be 0, and t must be finite. Then P(X =0) > 0.
Poisson is a good distribution for this, and even though we have assumed a constant rate, l, it is possible to be more general. But what we are trying to get at is the principle that time is never infinite and so the probability of the event that the Boltzmann Brain never forms is positive.
Furthermore, if we divide time into even segments and apply a uniform probability function to each segment regarding the chance if generating a Boltzmann Brain, we could look at sequences like FFFFFS..., or FFFFFF.... where P(F) >> P(S). Each sequence will have a zero probability of occurring theoretically in a completed infinity. Yet FFFFFF... would be more probable than any sequence containing S.
Now if S terminated the sequence, P(F)^n >> P(F)^(n-1)P(S), so a sequence having no successes is still more likely.
So, with completed infinity in mind, I think there is still a chance that a Boltzmann Brain would fail to materialize.
@@Disculogic My final argument:
The claim that every possible entity will be accreted given "infinite" time is fallacious. Even though, theoretically, any sequence of successes and failures of the creation of a given entity tends toward zero probability, that does not mean that that sequence is impossible. So, the sequence of nothing but failures is also possible, and, in fact, more likely than any given sequence containing a success.
It is also true that the amount of matter is finite, which means that the probabilities are not independent from one creation event to another of any given entity. So, it seems that the probability that every possible configuration of matter is accreted must be very near zero.
Nevertheless, creation of Boltzmann Brains is the more likely outcome; however, if the brain were anything like ours, it would require what amounts to a body that can withstand the conditions of space. It would probably require oxygen and nutrients, heat and water. This would mean that it may require something like a planet of sufficient size to capture an atmosphere, and which is near a star to supply heat. But if this is a maximum entropy universe, could a sun be possible?
But the very very low probability still could see infinitely many BBs over an unbounded span of time.
If BBs require a planet for survival, then the BB mechanism would compete with the more likely mechanism posited for the creation of humans. If the planet formed and the BB some billions of years after, creatures might have formed "spontaneously" as they are posited to have done in Earth. The BB would then have to compete with these creatures for survival. Because they are not naturally adapted in most cases, the BB would lose the competition. But some would likely survive.
Yet, I do think that if we look more at the specific requirements and the likely conditions of the universe, the more our notion of a BB will tend toward impossible.
Honestly if you think about Stuart Hameroff and Sir Roger Penrose, they believe thoughts travel back in time. Maybe neurons boltzmanned themselves into existence?
You're talking about Retroactivity. Interestingly I'm covering that theory in the next episode.
If I understand the BB correctly, it materializes instantly out of quantum field fluctuations. Two major problems I see. (1) Consciousness as we know it (as emergent from our brain) arise from the “need” to survive. All conscious organisms function to survive. That requires an effector system -motor functions - to acquire energy sources and protect against damage. That would be lacking in a BB. (2) Such a highely unlikely organization would require energy to maintain it’s structure. Where does that come from? It took 2.5 billion years for humans to develop, meaning to assemble the means to convert surrounding material to a form (e.g. glucose) that can be used to maintain it’s structure against entropy. Otherwise, the BB would not last long enough to have more than a few “thoughts”, much less a whole dream.
Nice video as always, but your voice gave it a special flair.
Thank you, and agreed on the voice. I received many complaints about my accent, so I thought maybe I should try another narrator and see how people respond.
Concesness is in a space cloud,brain is just a space folder.
This is like an ant theorizing how a garden emerged. Theres a point where we surrender to a greatness larger than our 3D selves.
This line of reasoning only serves to prop up material reality in contrast to what we all know intuitively. I am not my body nor do i exist in my mind. I can observe my own thoughts.
the voice sounds like an audio book ..its missing your passion
It's not that dry IMO, but I agree that the passion isn't there compared to my voice. I received many complaints about my accent, so I thought maybe I should try another narrator and see how people respond.
@@Disculogicplease bring your own voice back!
This theory (Bolzmann) its disturbingly depressing, if you think about it.
Almost nothing at all, not even heath or any other meaningful energy interaction...WTF!!!
The only "good" characteristic it has, is that even counsciousness doesn't exist and so, nobody would really be aware of it, hence if wouldn't really matter for us in any meaningful way, emotionally, physically or otherwise.
****In my opinion, our (we, the human species) knowledge about the universe at this "point in time" lack comprehensiveness, among other things and so it is highly unlikely for any of us to see the universe with its happenings beyond the tip of our nose, this being a very optimist outlook about our self-worth within these lines of thought.
Surley it must be a quicker way to get where we need to be, as this scientifically "learning, applying, evaluating results and re-evaluating them, times and times again, etc" is a very, but very slow process when it comes to our life span and can yield many (all type ) errors on its way.
Why shouldn't there be multiple paths to the same outcome, since one is possible?!!?! Who says there must be only one way to the result?!?!?
🤨🙂
Instant sub. Great vid! But yeh im new so saw this video first. Then read the accent comment and your other vids. Please use your voice ❤dont let trolls effect you
That's great, thank you! I'll use my voice for sure.
Entangled states can continue to exist in such a universe.
maybe if one looks at it in terms of observer moments it might help with the Boltzmann Brain problem.
If you can get one Boltzmann of yourself , then you could get a lot more at different points in time. Since they are all "you" they would all be entangled with each other into a continuous experience of moments.
Years ago, I used to read kenneth Galbraith, especially the affluent society. If only they had listened then. The love of money is truly the root of all evil, just as it was 2000 years ago when first stated by the carpenter of Galilee. .
I feel like once space is spread out so far it will pop creating a new bubble. It will leave behind a cmb and down the road will be measured by another civilization. Who evolved and studied the stars. This is what sir roger penrose was explaing about his theory.
I'll release an episode on that thought believe it or not, but it's not Penrose's theory. That's CCC. I'll cover that too.
@Disculogic oh yeah Penrose isn't apart of that thought? Well I'll be intreasted in seeing it
Ok so I collect these episodes because of the uniqueness and thought provoking content. The other great feature is narration of your own voice and accent that I grew accustomed to. This polished AI “smoothie” voice is just not it. I know it’s a bit more work on your part but please return to your own narration!
Thanks so much for the support 🙏 and yes, my voice will return.
@@Disculogic👍
Isn't entropy the lack of unique data points. The second law is that everything gets cold eventually. By extension wouldn't that indicate that entropy is that everything moves toward sameness?
Gravity?
I like the deep feeling l get when l watch you're videos. You got talent for this! I wish you cloud make a video about god and deep ideas about that area.
Love the "deep feeling" compliment. Thank you 🙏 Maybe someday, but probably it'll be mostly philosophy, not that much science.
@@Disculogic l would love the deep philosophy ideas about that topic!
But, isn’t that a complex iteration of Russel’s Teapot analogy?
Russel's teapot analysis is wrong. There is a probability of a teapot existing out in space. Russel's paradox is also solvable using superpositions. Just like Schrodinger's cat in a superposition of dead and alive. You can get a barber in a superposition of having shaved himself and not. This is why Godel and Turing are wrong also, they think in terms of Newtons classical world. Math has to be revamped and expressed with the reality of the quantum world from the git go.
I will love everything you do, but you must use your own voice. It’s perfect, it’s unique, part of your brand. You must absolutely go back to using it! 👍
Nice to hear that. I’ll continue narrating myself. Appreciate the feedback.
Do the quantum fields disappear
EW DO XELEE SEQUENCE NEXT
Consiouseness link to 5D
Why would conciousness connect to a random ass brain in the nowhere. We are choosing earth because there is cool gravity here and other people too and we can learn easy stuff like morality and not being stupid. A good enough place for level 1 conciousness before being allowed to some galactic empire where if you cannot behave you could destroy an entire galaxy, not just planet.
The Universe was in A Commotised state in2 light
That's free real estate...
What caliber
Mostly visuals. Took me thousands of hours to simulate, render and composite the visuals you see in 5 episodes.
@@Disculogic I w joking. I'm new. Good job
@@ericchristian6710 All cool, thanks.
No much useful work these days either
🦋🕊🙏
What happened to your voice!?
It took a break, will reappear in the next one😏
Scientist csn believe in a Boltzmann brain, but not a god?
I mentioned that theorists are always trying to come up with cosmological models that avoid Boltzmann brains. I agree that both BB & god are unfalsifiable hypotheses.
21:40 your contradicted yourself. You said complexity of experiences etc etc proves we aren't boltsman brains. No it doesn't, since you hypothesised the emergence of boltsman brain at random in infinite time and space universe. Each brain is as complex as universe itself. Who's to say universe isn't a brain to begin with anyway. Regardless, if brain appearing is considered not impossible in limitless universe, then you really have no good argument about life experience not being just product of such.
And anyway, time only makes sense for observer. So up to the point of universe getting created, being it via evolution or spontaneously could very well be exactly the one and the same thing, only described from two different perspectives. For infinite time universe, our evolutionary existence in present universe is exactly just an instant. No matter how many billion exponential eons universe would exist in planetary, galactical order, all this time compared with infinity of endless cyclic universe is nothing more than an instant. Basic maths prove that. So with evidence we have - boltsman brain universe is one of most sophisticated view on existence and our lives.
Any other theory could only be as likely as this, not surpassing it. Since your only way to prove to yourself you aren't just a brain in universe is when you die and find out. So there isn't no clever arguments here you can throw to prove anything otherwise to anyone since this is philosophical problem, not scientific. Since science can't observe beyond its own boundaries of existence....
And it's funny when you say false memories. How can memories be false if that's the only memories there exist. Hypothetically there isn't a better explanation to life than that it is alone and all stars galaxies, sciences only exist cause this lonely mind believes they exist. Not that any living being can be disproven of this since its unknown. If you knew, if boltsman knew then he wouldn't have to hypothesise. The fact you even debating this is because there isn't any better answer. Life is a mystery. Mystery in a sense that no living being while its alive could ever know if they even exist at all or not. You don't decide the rhythm of your breathing or when exactly will you wake up. If you wake up since statistically death is more likely while asleep than while awake. How would your brain would know that it died and never woke up. You wouldn't. Wherever cosmos conical randomness would throw your experience next week always remain a mystery to everyone.
"Who's to say universe isn't a brain to begin with anyway." sounds totally irrelevant. "For infinite time universe..." that's an assumption is cosmology, I went over it. "with evidence we have - boltsman brain universe is one of most sophisticated view on existence and our lives." No it isn't, and I discussed why.
Seems like you don't know what a false memory is. Also misspelled Boltzmann all over the place.
@Disculogic is discussed why but arguments aren't tangible. Since universe is infinite, time is infinite, then as much as its probabilisticaly unlikely, its also inevitable consciousness would find itself appearing in physically constrained vessel of flesh and bone experience of what it appears life although as long as experience lasts, one would never know if all this real for whatever we think real is.
It's impossible to rationally construct any arguments that would prove me being as real as you are. Meaning - if brain appearing is possibility then it's as likely as me being just some npc of cosmos while you are the only one real conscious player experiencing life whilst all else is just an illusion.
Then you say its less likely which what annoyed me since it looks like you solved the riddle but then without any reasonable argument just state its unlikely. No. You were right the first time. Its more likely that than two conscious beings happening to inhabit same spot in universe at same time
@Disculogic as you said too- its very scary and gloomy, but logically it's consistent. Just because you scared of idea that consciousness is alone in universe doesn't allow you to make up irrational argument that it isn't the case
It's just annoying when you say something stupid every time you finish saying something smart. As if you forget what you just said moment ago. How can boltsman brain be less probable than evolutionary existence when you can easily think of them both as the same thing anyway. It is the same thing. Who throws those random particles into existence anyway. All this is a mystery for us to crack since we don't have tools to do so. So with so many unknowns, you can't reasonably justify the probability between apples and oranges.
You just sound totally dumb when you finish segment on clever thought only to smash it with some dumb statement like this one where you comparing two things without having common frame of reference
I didn't say anything dumb. Pay more attention.
First time seeing your channel-and even though 90% of my free time every single day is devoted to intense study of quantum mechanics-philosophy-an esoteric theories of reality -I’m amazed by the thought experiment I went through two minutes in (after having my brain broken for a moment going through a sudden existential crisis😂❤😮!)☝️🌞🪽😳🪽👍 9:00
That sounds great! Then make sure to check out the previous episode as well.
Lost me around 6 minutes
Whyd you stop narrarating??
Testing to see what's working and what doesn't. Also some people didn't like the accent, but now I see that it's a tiny minority.
How about a boltzmann almighty God 🤣🤦🏻♀️😭
👩🏻💻👏🏻🫡🫀🫂🌡️🪆
You should be taxed for emoji usage.
@@Disculogic being trilingual.
Makes emojis feel like a universal language.
🫣🤣
More ai chatbot narration garbage. Avoid
The aspects that you decided to flat out avoid: Comprehensive research + 3D 4k visuals and dynamic simulations + music from great artists. Good day.
You must be new here
Doesn't sound like AI to me! This is well narrated, edited, and produced. Maybe a video that you should NOT avoid?
I’ll avoid alright. Avoid your dumb ass.