Here's the movie they should have made if you're gonna use time travel: Old Indy regrets a choice he made in the past. Cut to flashbacks of young Indy on an adventure we've never seen. Somebody tells old Indy "what if you could go back and change it". This leads old Indy on an adventure to find the dial. The movie cuts from old Indy to young Indy having adventures that are both narratively driving the plot forward and comically showing the difference between young and old. Young Indy is strong, brash and impulsive and makes mistakes. Old Indy is slower, but more measured and clever. The third act is old Indy back in time watching young Indy. Old Indy has to make a choice at a pivotal moment: change the past or allow the same mistake to happen because mistakes help us grow and learn and they are part of who we are. Old Indy watches, pained, at the choice but he remembers his dad saying "let it go, son". He smiles, turns the dial and disappears as the young Indy rides off toward adventure. Cue music.
I remember as a kid in my grandparents' countryside home exploring around with my satchel, a rope on my shoulder, and a big stetson hat larger than my head, looking after lost pre columbian temples, and hidden treasures...That's my level of fondness for tthe Indiana Jones character! The first three movies are Awesome pieces of entertainment, being "Raiders of the Lost Ark" the crown jewel of modern action Adventure cinema ... Adventure! That's truly a word that inherently has some mysthicism, at least That's what I got From Fiction, From media, enjoying the Indy series, as well the 80s Tales of The Gold Monkey, Big Trouble in Little China , or yes, even The Mummy (1999), because wether the NPC like it or not The Gen X loved such "scoundrels" like Indy , Jack Burton, or Rick O'Connel por their "corsair" spirit , but mostly, for The fun they gave us, FUN, a word sadly dismissed by the "Woke" ( Bolshevik ) crowd ...That's why I will ignore Indy 5 and its truly possible postmodernist deconstruction (destruction!) of a character, but mostly so, the swashbuckling Adventure cinema which I grew up. And we complained for Kingdom of The Crystal Skull! ...How funny; Never thought it was "bad" , just the weakest of the series. .
Kingdom of the Crystal Skull is a damn good film. I didn't realize it when it first came out, but I watched it again after 10 years and actually loved it. There's really only a few things in it that are out of place (Mutt Swinging). People weren't okay with interdimensional beings (not aliens, mind you), but they were okay with ghosts and magical rocks and undead Knights? The interdimensional aspect is at least hypothetically plausible (though obviously still fictional). "Yeah, but the ghosts were based in legend and history". Well I think some of you need to take a deep dive into the historical records pertaining to things resembling flying saucers, and what we would call "aliens". Lucas may have seemed off his rocker, but the more I research ancient archaeology, the more I think the tie (at least in fiction) to "aliens" is absolutely warranted. That being said, I have zero confidence in Disney to make a good Indiana Jones film.
Kathleen won't be fired. She's too much a part of the Establishment for that to happen. She's part of the Old Guard now. The OGs. Not someone you can insert as a token diversity hire and then replace like week old bin liner.
I really like the very evil vailenest animated characters. Very seriously looking at phoebe Waller Bridge! An saying who in the fuck are you! I probably laugh about that later.🤣😂😆😅😄💀🤣😂hahahahaha
I remember the concept of another Indiana Jones movie to be laughable like... 30 years ago. There was even a humorous sketch where Indiana needed a walker to escape the boulder.
They should've just recast Shia Labouf's character, Mutt. If you set it in the same decade as this movie seems to be set it, it would make sense if Mutt just got an archaeological degree and was finding artifacts and if you wanted; you can cameo Indy. That cameo would be natural too. But Indy should NOT be leading. But I know their reasoning: "We can't have a filthy straight white male as the lead character!". I hate this ideology. It hamstrings everything, you cant progress things in natural and logical way, and considering how unskilled most writers seem these days, that makes it worse. P.S It seems UA-cam is unusually working it's magic, I just found your channel via the recommendations.
The truth is nothing could make this movie look good. Not a trillion dollars, not a 100 year actor, not Disney who treat the franchise as a product to be milked to death and definitely not fans who expect their childhood to be recaptured by watching an unoriginal, rehashed concept to be sparkling new. The concept is 40 plus years old now. Time to look for something new and original.
When is the last time DIsney, especially Disney Lucasfilm produced anything good? Rogue One is the only thing I can remember that wasn't mediocre or terrible and that was Dec 2016. I think Indy 5 is just being made as part of Kathleen Kennedy's vendetta to destroy the work of George Lucas just like she has done repeatedly with Disney Star Wars (The Last Jedi, firing Gina Carano, interfering with The Book of Boba Fett, making a mockery out of the Kenobi series...) and the Willow series (now being removed from Disney+ as a tax write-off since it was received so terrible!).
80 year old Harrison Ford playing Indiana Jones is too old to put on his buckle, let alone swash his buckle, and those at Disney should know that. I’m not watching Indiana Jones 5, ever.
The truth is nothing could make this movie look good. Not a trillion dollars, not a 100 year actor, not Disney who treat the franchise as a product to be milked to death and definitely not fans who expect their childhood to be recaptured by watching an unoriginal, rehashed concept to be sparkling new. The concept is 40 plus years old now. Time to look for something new and original.
KOTCS was a terrible film, HF simply looked like he was going through the motions a lot of the time. From what I have seen here in the new one, he seems to be around three different ages and body weights as this film took so long to make. Much as I don't want it to be awful, I'm afraid it will be.
Just sit back, don’t go see the new “Indiana Jones” movie and enjoy the fact that, when enough fans reject this garbage, the result will be Disney losing another 150-200 million dollars based on the budget assumption. We’ll smother it very quickly and it won’t cost any of us a dime. Then repeat over and over again for every other movie they make to punish them for their insolence. Let’s see how much money they can stomach losing.
I had the same reaction when I heard about a sequel being made to BladeRunner. It turned out that BladeRunner 2049 wasn’t that bad, it wasn’t that good, but it wasn’t as bad as Indy 5. This film is gonna suck.
Here's the movie they should have made if you're gonna use time travel: Old Indy regrets a choice he made in the past. Cut to flashbacks of young Indy on an adventure we've never seen. Somebody tells old Indy "what if you could go back and change it". This leads old Indy on an adventure to find the dial. The movie cuts from old Indy to young Indy having adventures that are both narratively driving the plot forward and comically showing the difference between young and old. Young Indy is strong, brash and impulsive and makes mistakes. Old Indy is slower, but more measured and clever. The third act is old Indy back in time watching young Indy. Old Indy has to make a choice at a pivotal moment: change the past or allow the same mistake to happen because mistakes help us grow and learn and they are part of who we are. Old Indy watches, pained, at the choice but he remembers his dad saying "let it go, son". He smiles, turns the dial and disappears as the young Indy rides off toward adventure. Cue music.
I remember as a kid in my grandparents' countryside home exploring around with my satchel, a rope on my shoulder, and a big stetson hat larger than my head, looking after lost pre columbian temples, and hidden treasures...That's my level of fondness for tthe Indiana Jones character! The first three movies are Awesome pieces of entertainment, being "Raiders of the Lost Ark" the crown jewel of modern action Adventure cinema ... Adventure! That's truly a word that inherently has some mysthicism, at least That's what I got From Fiction, From media, enjoying the Indy series, as well the 80s Tales of The Gold Monkey, Big Trouble in Little China , or yes, even The Mummy (1999), because wether the NPC like it or not The Gen X loved such "scoundrels" like Indy , Jack Burton, or Rick O'Connel por their "corsair" spirit , but mostly, for The fun they gave us, FUN, a word sadly dismissed by the "Woke" ( Bolshevik ) crowd ...That's why I will ignore Indy 5 and its truly possible postmodernist deconstruction (destruction!) of a character, but mostly so, the swashbuckling Adventure cinema which I grew up. And we complained for Kingdom of The Crystal Skull! ...How funny; Never thought it was "bad" , just the weakest of the series.
.
Kingdom of the Crystal Skull is a damn good film. I didn't realize it when it first came out, but I watched it again after 10 years and actually loved it. There's really only a few things in it that are out of place (Mutt Swinging). People weren't okay with interdimensional beings (not aliens, mind you), but they were okay with ghosts and magical rocks and undead Knights? The interdimensional aspect is at least hypothetically plausible (though obviously still fictional). "Yeah, but the ghosts were based in legend and history". Well I think some of you need to take a deep dive into the historical records pertaining to things resembling flying saucers, and what we would call "aliens". Lucas may have seemed off his rocker, but the more I research ancient archaeology, the more I think the tie (at least in fiction) to "aliens" is absolutely warranted.
That being said, I have zero confidence in Disney to make a good Indiana Jones film.
I like Crystal skull, must be the only one
If you can't say something nice don't say anything but I want to SCREAM!
Sometimes being nice is redundant, especially when performed out of a need to secure social approval. Not every time, but sometimes...
I'm expecting indy 5 to epically bomb and for Kathleen Kennedy to be fired over it. I love my expectations! Lol
Just hope your right !
Kathleen won't be fired. She's too much a part of the Establishment for that to happen. She's part of the Old Guard now. The OGs. Not someone you can insert as a token diversity hire and then replace like week old bin liner.
@@Peak_Aussieman True.
I'd love Lord Sugar to summon Kathy to the boardroom just to say, "The Force is no longer with you Kathy. Kathy, you're fired!"
Compared to the latest Star Wars debacles, Kingdom of the Crystal Skull is a freaking masterpiece of cinema
This is going to be a decent movie. Mark my words.
I think you mistyped "bad" or "worse".💀
Your attempt at a joke was not funny.
@@bigtechisbigbrother8690 ya burnt.
Decent movie?!? Indiana Jones decent?
That's a let down now then, isn't ?
Damn good editing 😂
I do not why he made this movie because he doesn't need the money. I will read into this opening day
I did.
I aske for it
Don't forget Disney loves the British ginger woman too, Solo and Falcon ect.. plays the same role and has the same expression all the time 😅
I did. I love this franchise. I love star wars too, the,sequels rule. So I asked for this.
Did Solo have a spin off movie🤔🤣
I really like the very evil vailenest animated characters. Very seriously looking at phoebe Waller Bridge! An saying who in the fuck are you! I probably laugh about that later.🤣😂😆😅😄💀🤣😂hahahahaha
I remember the concept of another Indiana Jones movie to be laughable like... 30 years ago. There was even a humorous sketch where Indiana needed a walker to escape the boulder.
They should've just recast Shia Labouf's character, Mutt. If you set it in the same decade as this movie seems to be set it, it would make sense if Mutt just got an archaeological degree and was finding artifacts and if you wanted; you can cameo Indy. That cameo would be natural too. But Indy should NOT be leading.
But I know their reasoning: "We can't have a filthy straight white male as the lead character!". I hate this ideology. It hamstrings everything, you cant progress things in natural and logical way, and considering how unskilled most writers seem these days, that makes it worse.
P.S It seems UA-cam is unusually working it's magic, I just found your channel via the recommendations.
Yeah, just recast someone to play an older wiser Mutt. And just made Indy 5 about Indy & Mutt rekindle their bond after not seeing eachother for years
Indiana Jones and the dial of the narcissistic feminists
Will make crystal skull look good
The truth is nothing could make this movie look good. Not a trillion dollars, not a 100 year actor, not Disney who treat the franchise as a product to be milked to death and definitely not fans who expect their childhood to be recaptured by watching an unoriginal, rehashed concept to be sparkling new. The concept is 40 plus years old now. Time to look for something new and original.
When is the last time DIsney, especially Disney Lucasfilm produced anything good? Rogue One is the only thing I can remember that wasn't mediocre or terrible and that was Dec 2016. I think Indy 5 is just being made as part of Kathleen Kennedy's vendetta to destroy the work of George Lucas just like she has done repeatedly with Disney Star Wars (The Last Jedi, firing Gina Carano, interfering with The Book of Boba Fett, making a mockery out of the Kenobi series...) and the Willow series (now being removed from Disney+ as a tax write-off since it was received so terrible!).
Kathleen Kennedy DID, Why ? Because She's the bestest Evarrrr !
God i'm so happy this POS movie is sinking like Titanic, its time to move on, SW and Indy are dead. So.....Let's move on !
Destroyed by the Disney Empire
@@tonyfendex2558 Complete to the ground !
Indiana Jones and woke fantasies of Kathleen Kennedy…
Lots of positive reviews out there, stop making shit up for clicks mate. I'm really looking forward to it, don't be so mean-spirited and minded.
How about a revisit for Anthony Ingruber? That guy does a great impression of Ford.
Crystal skull is a good movie and better than temple of doom.
4:13 I felt kinda bad for Harrison, you can tell he was bummed this POS is the last Indiana Jones movie
80 year old Harrison Ford playing Indiana Jones is too old to put on his buckle, let alone swash his buckle, and those at Disney should know that. I’m not watching Indiana Jones 5, ever.
The truth is nothing could make this movie look good. Not a trillion dollars, not a 100 year actor, not Disney who treat the franchise as a product to be milked to death and definitely not fans who expect their childhood to be recaptured by watching an unoriginal, rehashed concept to be sparkling new. The concept is 40 plus years old now. Time to look for something new and original.
KOTCS was a terrible film, HF simply looked like he was going through the motions a lot of the time. From what I have seen here in the new one, he seems to be around three different ages and body weights as this film took so long to make. Much as I don't want it to be awful, I'm afraid it will be.
Just sit back, don’t go see the new “Indiana Jones” movie and enjoy the fact that, when enough fans reject this garbage, the result will be Disney losing another 150-200 million dollars based on the budget assumption. We’ll smother it very quickly and it won’t cost any of us a dime. Then repeat over and over again for every other movie they make to punish them for their insolence. Let’s see how much money they can stomach losing.
Everything you said at the start was exactly what I thought when IJ4 was announced - now it’s just pathetic.
The curse is Disney who took. Franchise and totally created a dumpster fire
I had the same reaction when I heard about a sequel being made to BladeRunner. It turned out that BladeRunner 2049 wasn’t that bad, it wasn’t that good, but it wasn’t as bad as Indy 5. This film is gonna suck.