BREAKING NEWS: Rand Paul Battles Against Bill He Says Will Lead To Government Internet Regulation
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 вер 2024
- On the Senate floor, Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) battled lawmakers of both parties over the Kids Online Safety Act.
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
account.forbes...
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: / forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: / forbes
More From Forbes: forbes.com
You know what gives me anxiety? Federal government
Hands down my greatest anxiety. But my anxiety is due to corrupt radical people holding on to power in the government currently. We have the power to change that in this election
I am from the government and I am here to help.
-Ronald Regan, actor President and you missed me....
Same!! They've done it to me and everyone else in this country!!
@@kisamano3684 only if we ALL Vote!!
Politicos are busy redefining the inestimable importance of the term " Patriot", to "Far Right - Domestic Terrorist,". "Dialectics" - a twisting of words and their original meaning to suit your purpose. Gradually , at first,😮 the political agenda shapes Public Opinion of the next Generation.
I am SICK of our clearly established rights being on the chopping block and people not being outraged! No, you cannot, "Shall. Not. Be. Infringed." It did not stutter!
Just say no to Palestine, alcoholics anonymous and pakistan but only half way with pakistan. .5% alcohol is allowed.
meaning we have the right to topple a illegitimate govt. or if the legitimate govt turns tyrannical, then we can remove them too
They have broken our social contracts. Revoking consent to be governed is the only lasting solution. Thus any act to force compliance becomes by definition tyranny.
They need to teach everyone how to Actuall Discharge their Debts, like everyday bills with the Trust setup when we were born and our Birth Certificate was Bonded and put on the market!!
The banking act of 1933 and the bills of exchange act!
Sen Paul, thank for your work and preparation. I pray for your success. It’s to our benefit.
Parent your children, nobody's duty but your own!
Isn't the government removing the ability to do so? This is just them moving forward.
I CANNOT believe this isn't just common sense anymore. I swear it's extinct.
Yes and that includes educating them on the founding principles of our country including the Constitution the Bill of Rights. Part of the reason we're having this ridiculous debate right now is because we have a generation or two who were never properly educated about any of it. All they learned about America was that it sucks.
Lazy parents even though their in the computer industry. SAME ON THEM !
My thoughts exactly!
FREEDOM OF SPEECH!
WHO CENSORS THE CENSORS!
The Totalitarian Government?
Starting to sound like everyone should be turning off the internet and throwing away these tracking devices like cellphone and go back to regular house phones and start calling 📞 people up or go to the park or a movie or even hanging out in a parking lot like they did years ago before the internet .
@annajohnson3309 that sounds amazing
@@annajohnson3309cops will harrass you for parking lot loitering better to hike out in the wilderness and lose the world
🦆Too Bad Joe Biden had the Dislike Button is Disabled.👎👎🏿👎, he was getting 500,000 thumbs down to one up.
Didn't watch but I'm assuming Rand Paul defended the constitution and the senate went on to disregard the constitution.
Because “it’s a democracy!” -Some Democrat everyday everywhere
That's a pretty safe bet.
It’s a Republic if you can keep it.
bingo.
Pretty much
Rand is right
per usual.
"ALL Laws repugnant to the Consttution are null & void." Marbury V Madison SCOTUS DECISION
How about we leave this up to the parents where it should be! Government is horrible at everything it does and will always be manipulated to hurt we the people in the end.
Government needs to stop making laws over the people.
imo a more robust child lock on the web browsers that can blacklist any page with words or tags the parents list would be nice.
On the mention of gaming, it's fine. It's the parent's fault for buying T+ games for their lil goblins to cry about. The exception being gacha and lootboxes. Imo that stuff should be AO and lumped in with casinos.
It has been left up to the parents from the start. Simply look at Gen Alpha. The brain rotten Tablet Kids.
@zetsumeinaito no. Don't let your kids online unless you're there supervising them. Don't give them your phone as an extended pacifier. This is what we mean by raise your kids, be in their moments with them. Disciplin them, and teach them. Every. Single. Day.
@@adamwright2596 I remember being a kid. Parents are busy.
I remember only really dealing with either particular parent 5ish hours a day. Old man works 9 to 5, I saw him for 4 hours, and he was busy showering and cooking half of that time. Old lady worked 3rd shift, so 9pm to 5am. She was technically home, but asleep most of the time, as I saw her awake before school and a couple hours before she went to work.
So how bout you get off your idealist rich man high horse and face reality. Parents work, and ain't got time. Only a family with a parent with a 100k+ job could afford to have a home maker raise the kids properly(As long as it's not Cali or NY).
can i ask a serious question? at what point, at what line has to be crossed before the American people finally call a convention of states and put an end to all of this??.. NO one even asked for the GOV to do this, let alone all the other nanny state crap they are posing on us.. SO sick of all of these people that have been in Gov for decades thinking they know and going to tell us what and how to think..
Exactly what I came here to say. Who asked for this? Not the constituents, that’s for sure.
Term limits
@@tombayless9759 Term limits are not a fail safe solution. Sen. Rand Paul, Sen. John Kennedy are but 2 examples of long serving legislators who deserve to remain in office. We need more TERM BEGINNERS! Government is supposed to be of the people, by the people and for the people! PEOPLE need to get involved on library, utility, school boards etc!! Government is meant to be public service not an elite class of “politicians.” ✌🏽
And yes, I served for 6 years on a utility board. I stumbled into issues with the Good Ol’ Boys which required attention. I beat the incumbent in the primary and made VERY good changes!! DAYLIGHT DAWNED! Very stressful but extremely worthwhile for the community. My actions inspired others to put their names on the ballot & serve in office as well. ✌🏽 🇺🇸❤️🇺🇸
So tired of these nobodies telling me what I can and cannot do.
Duty of care for a child is the parents job, not the government
Government wants you to control what your kids learn
When they should teach tolerance they go to far with everything thing more then they should. Let parents decide not a bureaucrat.. bad enough what they are doing in younger age children. Could lead to scary future if any errors are made allow parents to trailer it some how it passes
As long as parents can adjust it.
@@jmanke6057
What does that mean? Adjust WHAT?
@@anti-ethniccleansing465 The danger is if it passes children will only see what controlling party wants them to. Better to have free speech give the power to block only be left to the parents If they give parents extra tools so can pick and choose you could have a general PG, adult, ratings whatever they deem necessary but let the parents turn it off or on. Depending on the child seems we have that tool already. But state should never block speech not in the USA 🇺🇸 perhaps those pushing it need to be looked at they are trying to hurt free speech?
If I understood it correctly to dangerous without corn Paul’s amendment added
I never thought I'd completely agree with Rand Paul. Stop regulating adult speech to " protect the children". Protect freedom of speech FOR your children! They'll grow up one day. You want them to live in a government controlled world???
Interesting. Rand Paul is advocating for the rights of Americans like he always does. He’s one of a handful of Senators that actually care about preserving our Constitutional rights.
it will get worse, this is the scariest bill, same one we r fighting about in Canada, we r far gone, our only hope is Trump winning. Every1 born and raised in Canada majorly supports Trump bc the writing is on the wall. Don't be fooled, any1 supporting this bill is the enemy
@@sukt00
Indeed. I voted for his dad one year, despite disagreeing with him on one thing - his strict stance on being anti-abortion. Also, I have a bad feeling they both support “is. Real.”
This dude is one of the soundest senators in the U.S. capitol.
Rand Paul for president
@@tombayless9759
When his dad ran for president, the new stations wouldn’t even allow him in the debates.
@anti-ethniccleansing465 Ron won the republican nomination. The RNC changed the winner to Romney. It was insane. He would've been the president. Nobody even close to Ron Paul in politics.
Why don’t you pass a bill that says the government cannot put out misinformation or lie????
"Rats play when cat is crippled."
No enemy will destroy is, stupidity will.
How would it be enforced? Won't happen unless and until the prosecutorial function is universalized.
That's a nice idea but it will never happen.
Because they hate us, it would never pass. Rand is the exception
The excuse for any censorship is always "Think of the children".
If you don't want your children to see certain websites, then help them to use the best websites.
AND TALK TO YOUR KIDS.
This is the crap about Washington Lawmakers that sucks, people that write/sponsor bills like this and vote for them should be held accountable, even when they leave office!!!
The lawmakers are held accountable by the People and Constitution. Unfortunately, far to few Americans speak out and our lawmakers have thus made themselves untouchable refusing to answer phone calls and work with the American people. Vote them out!
Our founding fathers knew how to hold a tyrannical government accountable
People who write anxiety causing bills with misleading, innocent sounding names will NEVER BE responsible for the children they have damaged. I want to see a law requiring bills to be aptly named. This is Round-up labeled 7-up.
How about perjury.
Not executing their oath of office.
Shouldnt that be grounds for immediate removal? No vote necessary.
its gone if they control the narrative, over. This bill is so obviously not about protecting kids!! hahah
censorship of any kind is a solid no for me. Don't care what people say or write...words have zero weight. People who are hurt by words never had their asses kicked and it shows.
Word have power to move people to action. They convey ideas and INTENTION. The human mind is fickle and wants to be told what to do.
While most people regulate their thoughts there are some that do not have meta- cognitive practices to help them filter and assess thoughts and the actions precipitated by those thoughts.
As you think so you are.
@@marionchase-kleeves8311
If you don’t like our first amendment, please take a permanent vacation to North Korea.
This will age about as well as the Patriot Act...
100%
It might be worse.
@@Sammysgrl22If it isn't stuck down
Sadly YT is already doing it, but they are protecting self interest and not the population.
Self interest? They are doing it because they are in cahoots with the gov and adI.
The Government gives me anxiety and makes me depressed.
Rand Paul is correct
Congress do your job. Quit delegating your duties by empowering other institutions. Stick to the Constitution
This is a gross over reach of power. Shut it down.
I love how they all know to be nowhere near rand when he talks 😂.
Whether or not you agree with him, at least he can talk instead of reading someone else's prepared statements.
I’m not sure this means what you think it means
I don’t think it’s funny that we don’t see the people being present who are paid by us to actually legislate and vote. It should be mandatory to always be present. But our gov’t has been a joke for eons - at least over 100 years.
Almost anything can be unsafe. That's not a great standard..
Parent can control it already there are tools if they choose to use them.
None are perfect. Adding tags that say this site might not appropriate for children would make it enough but right for one isn’t for another. Free speech always save the USA 🇺🇸
We all know what will and won't be censored.....
And it’s never used properly leave it parents
Nothing going to be cenored kosa its fake nothing going happeneing to internet 1st amendment right
@@ghostbaz12 Sure hope that’s the case. I like to hear from all sides each group sometimes seems or feels I only get info from one side at times. Because they send me just one side on UA-cam unless I go out of my way searching the other side.Think they try to group me into a group I don’t fit into a 100% true it might just seem that way. Guess it not controlled but almost seems that way. I listen from all over the world kind of a hobby.
Just say no to KOSA!!! 🤬🤬🤬🤬
Parents should police their children, their devices, accounts and Internet access and time!
We have laws against slander, and libel. They apply to the Internet. We don’t need more laws
if you ever wanted to know who the government thinks is your parent, here you go
Yes but who feeds that child and raises them the government? Might as well say let’s make all children wards of the state parents think they have rights just because they bore them? Crazy new world this was done before and didn’t go that well.
@@jmanke6057 I'm not sure whether you agree with my comment or not
If it didn't do so well, why are we all here?
@@juancuelloespinosa Think a lot us do
The Internet should be treated as the first amendment itself.
The Ferinheit book right before our eyes
Nothing ever should be censored ever its treason and voids all bills
They don't give a crap about the kids. There is something else they are trying to do that will be devastating to Americans.
Bingo. Using kids is just the excuse.
There is already a censorship problem, and the gov wants to triple down on making it worse, instead of going after those implementing the censorship.
They’re using the same exact schtick as they did a few years ago: We’re restricting rights in the name of “safety.”
The Left ALWAYS has ulterior motives.
"Most of the harm in the world is done by good people."
What we FAIL TO DO is more significant than overtly committing harm.
“All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.” (misattributed to Edmond Burke)
25:12 , Mr Paul asks , AND I ask , how are we to give our opinions on controversial topics if we can debate it ?
People do read these comments , you know . And they do come back asking why we think that way . Personally , I think that is the one blessing of the internet . Can anyone else agree with that ?
I agree man. And if you don’t want the “anxiety” then, scroll past the comments. lol
Amen
I know my own opinion has changed over time thanks to comments on social media. Sometimes it's a slight, nuanced change, other times it leads to more significant revelations.
@@Franimus yah , I get it too . The thing is that platforms have been tasked to edit our opinions if it doesn’t agree with theirs . And sometimes the government steps in and says you can’t say that ! The thing is though that they can cuss if they want .
These platforms are supposed to the messengers . NOT THE CONTENT CREATORS . And unfortunately those are the standards they are being held to . STOP SHOOTING THE MESSENGER !
I and “I “ alone am responsible for my speech ! No one else . If I offend you , you are free to tell me ( in my mind ) what you think ! And congress needs to step aside . UNLESS THERE ARE OTHER ENTITIES OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES , who got offended . Still they are free to speak their minds too . Just identify yourself please . And I will endeavor to curb , what offended you .
But in any case , STOP SHOOTING THE MESSENGER !
@@Franimus how are we to debate controlvercial subjects if we can NOT debate it ! ?
This is Round-Up labeled 7-Up! DO NOT PASS! Good Job Rand
To those saying, "The forefathers couldn't have prepared for this" I beg to differ.
“Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.” - Benjamin Franklin
Parents need to be active and engaged in their kid's life. This belongs to the parents. We don't need more reach as if they find out your kid is watching stuff around this filter then they may imprison YOU for "negligence" or some other shit.
It's a slippery slope.
The government needs to stay in their lane. They have one job: protect our rights. That’s it. I don’t need them ‘protecting my mental health.’
If they gave a crap about people’s mental health they wouldn’t be pushing a mental health crisis onto children in public schools, and forcing the military to go along with the same insanity.
Indeed… If the gov was so into protecting mental health for kids, they wouldn’t have made kids wear face coverings, pull them out of school, push critical “ray. Ce” theory on then, push tbgI (backwards) on them, etc etc.
Indeed… If the gov was so into protecting their mental health, they wouldn’t have made them wear face coverings, pull them out of “sk0. 00L,” push kriticaI “ray. Ce” theory on then, push tbgI (backwards) on them, etc etc.
Indeed… If the gov was so into protecting their mental health, they wouldn’t have made them wear face coverings, just for starters...
... nor would they pull them out of “sk0. 00L,” push kriticaI “ray. Ce” theory on them, push tbgI (backwards) on them, etc etc.
The fact I had to break up my comment like that, and write certain words “creatively,” shows how much censorship we already have! But the gov wants MOAR!
How about we get rid of the government?
This causes me Anxiety
I remember when they banned me from owning a firearm back in the mid 80's. Went on to catch like 4-5 illegal possession charges since then. Dont hear too well when my rights are being infringed upon
Uhm, did you commit a felony?
@@slaapliedje haven't read anything in the constitution or the second amendment that says anything about felonies
@@slaapliedje What felony? You know what IS a felony? 18 USC § 242 - Deprivation of rights under color of law
"Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death."
I don't know the guy or the details of his case but I'm going to take a wild guess and say the felons were the people that arrested him for exercising his Second Amendment right.
@@slaapliedje Bans against nonviolent felons will soon (in the grand scheme of history) be overturned as unconstitutional. Also people will be entitled to due process when accused of being prone to violence. Red flag laws won't last long.
@@slaapliedje
Um, where does the Constitution say anything about people can’t be armed if they aren’t in jail/prison?
IT'S ALREADY HAPPENING FOLK'S as we all can tell with YT removing comments, this is just the horse and pony show
Exactly.
ther same argument for guns its individual responsibility dont let them strip you liberties, men and women have autonomy and morals
WHO decides what mental health out comes mean when even what is done in the name of 'mental health ' can change ? this is the wrong path.
I want a bill against bad tasting food…. STAT!!!
Pelosi and Nadler cause anxiety for me; should you censor them?😂
Yes ....they can clause nightmares and high anxiety....term limits...
No we need too know what evil we are up against.
how does something this badly written even get voted on? you'd get an F turning this in to your teacher in school.
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)
Where rights (speech) secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rulemaking or legislation which would abrogate them.
Who asked for this bill? That’s the question you have to ask yourselves. Did constituents ask for this? I doubt that completely.
I'm sure plenty of well-meaning constituents did ask for it, and then the lawmakers in their wisdom saw how they could use it to push cnrship. It'll be the planned emic free speech abuses all over again.
Do we really still need government when those in government come up with such foolish laws?
Is it just a coincidence that Canada is doing exactly the same bill at the same time?
The UK already passed one. Go to Sky News and read about it what a nightmare.
Policing includes dealing with online harassment abuse threats etc. we don't need more laws Canada is trying to do something similar.
If I'm on a platform I am choosing to go there. Will this censor The Rubin Report, Trigonometry, Tucker Carlson? for example
Those places are already self-censored. They never talk about the JQ.
Lady in white jacket said; no it does not give authority to this that and the other! She said it doesn't give authority to make any rules.....well then if that's the case how would it be effective at all? WHO does it give authority to? If no one, then how the hell would the new law be effective to do anything?
They lie right through their teeth and it doesn't take a while of of brain power and common sense to be able to see through their lies!
It really upsets me so many Republicans are cosponsors!!! Of all people, I'd expect them to be a bit more concerned about protecting the first amendment!!!
And if Rand Paul's amendment wouldn't change the bill because the bill doesn't promote cnrship, then allow it!!! It's literally just a protective amendment to say "this bill cannot be used for cnrship"!!!
Blumenthal and Blackburn did nothing but lie in those objections. Just gross.
You can't violate free speech even if some people, ok a lot of people, will believe anything you tell them. It amazes me that with the age of information has also brought in the age of extreme gullibility. Too many people are trading in truth for the echo chamber that tells them exactly what they want to hear.
No enemy will destroy us, stupidity will.
@@user-ij5lc1kw8r Exactly what has happened to Democrats.
@@user-cg3bg3hy7j How smart do I have to be to realize how stupid i am?
I think you're naive in your thinking. The rich and powerful have always controlled information and the lay folk have always been easily persuaded.
Let me help you think clearly about human beings. We are animals and we compete for mates and survival. We just do it more differently than any other animal but at its core, it's exactly the same.
Social medias are privately owned. They dont have to follow the amendments.
All thanks to social workers who have taken away parents ability to control their children!!!
Well thanks to AIPAC
I'm so tired of our lives being controlled by " harrowing" stories..
I would not vote for this bill
If this bill passes, lets all chip in and sue the federal government for this mockery. Marbury v. Madison!
This bill sounds like a GIANT Leap towards 1984!!
Thank you, Senator, for being the adult in the room. 🇺🇸
Thank you Senator Paul. Keep fighting
Nobody sees what's coming.
Let em have it.
I'm about to cut my internet off I'm tired of cencership and government and social media telling me what i can and cannot do
Thank God, for Senator Paul and men that stand up with common sense and righteousness
Whistleblower laws make that act void
This bill is an incredible governmental overreach which will supersede the efforts of mental health professionals to actually treat anxiety disorders. The goal is to live in the real world and learn to manage content and situations not protect an individual from every ounce of anxiety producing content. It is disempowering on every level.
Its not because social medias are all privately owned. Constititional amendments dont apply to private businesses.
@@sunnysidecarebear 🙄 you clearly don’t understand what is happening.
Maybe kids shouldn’t be allowed on the adult internet.
The whole point is how would you enforce that...
@@Franimus
It’s called parenting.
@@anti-ethniccleansing465 exactly, can't and shouldn't have a law banning it
Please listen to Rand Paul.
Their bill prevents them from dealing with their Constituents requests, by omitting the irrefutable knowledge of them. Oh I didn't know?
Don't we already have COPPA?
Why make an entirely new bill? Just update the other one.
Seems to me like these people DONT in fact have the "best intentions"
They are afraid kids will learn truth then how can they bend their minds. A decade from now we will say what happened to the USA if this passes.
Federal government gives me anxiety, maybe we should ban it
Yes
Don’t disregard our Constitution!
Let's pass a "Bill" requiring all Congressional Reps.& Senators to recite the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, out loud, on camera, at the beginning of each new, yearly, session. Then take an oath to read every page of any legislation they are going to sign. 😮
Right on man do they even know the oath?
the fundamental problem is, these congresspeople believe anxiety caused by the internet is their business at all. it isn't. I'm not interested in their thoughts about what is anxiety causing and what is not.
Tell 'em Rand!
This is America where we don’t police morality.
Unless you're one of 72 senators or 30-some representatives
Very good points by Rand Paul about this dangerous legislation.
As usual, Paul is spot on....Give them an inch.
I agree with the points that Senator Paul made. Once the government gets involved, things never go right!
Yes Senator Paul! It’s the parent’s responsibility to police their children on the internet . Government definitely does NOT need to be checking on what’s being said on line!!!!
I wish…. If that were the only thing they would remove from the Internet.
Thank you, Senator Paul
Truth hurt your feelings ? John 4-18
We live in America! Freedom of speech for all Americans! Government needs to not be overbearing.
He needs to run for President
You know what Jefferson said. Know your duty people.
The DSM not only updates but it has often been wrong, hence the updates.
"Won't somebody think of the CHILDREN!!!!"
Take Care of your children
Way to go Rand. We need more like him
This bill is horrible -thank you Kentucky for voting for Senator Paul.
Our government is the cause of my greatest anxiety.
Everyday they just WANT MORE POWER!!
WANT TO TELL PEOPLE WHAT TO DO!!
We have several now going adults who are homeless because they don't know who they belong to since parents had to work and gov does not give them love ....just money
WHat
32:10 Compairing cencorship with car safety was the stupidest arguement I've heard so far.
Why don't you write a bill that makes the PARENTS take responsibility for their OWN children? And what they watch?
Great idea. Give the government more power to interfere with parental rights. Ideas like that are fear based and short sighted-just like the one being discussed.
@@Sammysgrl22 You mean like the one where the government takes over internet regulation legally? They have had control over it for years and years and the more control over the internet they excerpt the worse things get for everyone. Parents should already be responsible for their children and the content they watch. The Government already has the power to come in and take your children if they deem you unfit. fear based? short sighted? you must be under thirteen.
Parents are already liable for their children
@Franimus I know. It was kind of joke...because they rarely enforce anything as I recall they wanted to defund the police...I want to defund the Government...lmao
FREEDOM !!!
Why are you wasting tax dollars on such nonsense. What about Biden's impeachment?