Unless the web becomes a paywall most content is up for grabs by aibots. That's why certain creators give some free content but if you want more there's a subscription.
it's more than the Web.. they want religions, govts, and everything with power... they want it all dead and under their control via AI. Their overlord Klaus Schwab talks about all of it.
@@NadimShaikh-qv7zj that seems like a simple internal management and organising decision, nothing that concerns us and no effect on output of products and services, just my guess
Nilay cooked. He always asks ceos challenging questions. But this one was crazy. Kinda hard to see Sundar struggle so much. But thank you Nilay we need more journalists like you
Agreed, it was interesting to see Sundar struggle through this but it also makes this topic scary for me. It seems like he was pressed on focusing on optimism, that he wasn’t prepared for those hard questions. In my opinion, he should be because these are some real concerns and these are the things Open AI, Microsoft, Google and soon Apple needs to consider.
@@sherlan1886 i dont really see sundar struggle as much as being honest instead of corporate BS. also some questions were framed at a pigeon hole way with singular case/anecdotal and he exercised a fair reframing of the questions
Nilay pressed him on some really tough questions, but I think that Sundar also tried to answer him (for the most part). I got the feeling he really wanted to say that if Google didn't switch to "AI Overviews" then other providers using RAG were simply going to eat Google's lunch (but I think he wanted to maintain Google's invincibility). Much better discussion than you normally get from CEO interviews.
He's avoiding the critical question being asked. And smaller websites are having a hard time, ofcourse the ''restaurant next door'' is doing very well, because it's sponsored and payed money to be seen. Google doesn't need to know it all, all it needs to do is guide us to the places that provide the information we seek. No Social media app can compare to how fun and informative websites of the past used to be. Google took that away..
Yes! No access journalism here. "Reckless" is thoughtful. Great. inteview. I listened to the whole thing in the car during the workday, but then came back here to watch the video.
You asked some hard questions! He seemed sincerely unsure how to answer a lot of them. Pichai seems completely committed to this current path, which I’m not sold on yet. Great interview, full of great insights.
I think that's something similar to every ai company right now. They all seem to be excited about the prospects, and don't legitimately trying to deal with possible negatives but still unsure of what will happen etc. it really shows how much of a uncharted territory this is
@@Cevicheliciouswhich is what makes it very very dangerous at the same time. If they are all going into this with just optimism, we are gonna have a major problem in the next few years. Clearly there are negatives and these cannot be ignored.
25:02 Watch the CEO’s face when he starts to pull out the phone 😂 Also, the interviewer laughs at the end of every answer of the CEO like everything is jolly and casual, then dropping another straight faced banger. It’s about time someone ask about the herd of elephants in the room.
Did he even answer a single question? He deeply feels something… is all I heard. Hardly any concrete answers/solutions for creators for all the deep thinking they do at Google.
In my opinion, Honest is the wrong word but out of all the interviews I have seen this one by far he opened up, Google invented the transformer, I think they have a bigger model than anyone but they got it every time wrong when competing with Open AI, and they can do more, but they have limitations like anti-trust cases, AI safety, etc..., They do have the tools. everyone wants exciting tools like chat GPT4o and something new the race is on so let's see who wins
Remember kids, there's no such thing as "searching the web". You're only ever searching some company's indexed corpus of the web's content. Edit: Lots of people in the comments are either not understanding my point (that censorship is inherent in how search engines work), or they believe this point is so obvious that it's not worth stating, which seems naive to me.
@@chris_ibeyou are wrong. Google gives you the web they want you to see. If you make a Website and Google doesn't want people to see it then it won't show up in search.
Nice questions, finally an interview that wasn't catered to make the interviewee look good. The answers on the other hand weren't that nice, seems like Sundar didn't even have a straight answer in the first place for many of them.
That's because of questions related, how it's gonna be in future or 5 years from now... how can Sundar Pichai predict that accurately... only presume / assume... but I appreciate the honesty of Sundar Pichai, always....
Nilay did a great job asking tough questions without excessively grilling Sundar to the point where he became defensive, although his answers to many questions weren't great, the interview itself was conducted well.
This interview didn't do much to quell my sense that Pichai is completely out of his depth. The question-dodging is not unexpected. I don't like it, but CEO gonna CEO. What's far more damning here are all the questions he appears to be completely unprepared for. I'm sure he's a smart dude - you don't just fail upwards into his role - but there really are times he comes across inarticulate and out of his depth. I've never seen a company's products be allowed to fall from grace so miserably. If AI is the direction he wants to go then do it! But to launch products before they're ready while allowing the existing products and services that they're replacing to devolve so dramatically that they're utterly unusable while the replacement is not up to scratch only leaves your users with an ecosystem where nothing works. This breeds resentment towards your brand and sends users looking for a replacement ecosystem. I genuinely think we're witnessing the biggest corporate fumble in modern history.
yeah, you're making really good points here - Sundar's unpreparedness in that interview is eerily reflective of how Google was caught off guard by OpenAI in recent years. I don't think they will go down but they will likely loose the leadership in the tech world - they already lost as a tech innovator for sure.
Google is scrambling to move fast but they are a VAST organization with many layers and this is the reality of mega corporations trying to “pivot” against this disruption
You absolutely fail upwards because the guys who go upwards aren’t the ones who do good things for users it’s the ones who make a lot of money for other people
This is an excellent interview! The Bloomberg interview felt like it was heavily scrutinized by Google. P.S. Having listened to the interview and having processed it, here's what I think is the primary problem with Pichai continuing to lead this monstrosity of an entity that's Google: He lacks opinions and visions that are his own. Unlike, say, Musk or Sama, Pichai doesn't seem to have any strong opinions about anything. He seems like a robot, reacting to the things happening around it according to its programming. That works when everything is going well and there's no competition, but backfires when you're required to innovate. Whenever some critical question (that didn't require technicalities but were more of a moral/philosophical question) was asked, he defaulted to "i don't know, i'll have to ask my team". I think that's a huge problem. I think that my point can be proven by the fact that google services have been becoming increasingly buggy and unreliable. They've also cancelled some incredible projects that had the potential of becoming massive if only they could keep pushing through and taken some minor losses for a few initial years. That's the result of someone who lacks vision and passion.
To be fair, Google is a massive conglemerate a many business units. To have granular opinions on all topics seems like a tall order to fill. I agree that he needs to be more decisive and have a “go forward” vision. But this level of disruption is a dance with one foot in the future and one future in the “current state” since AI first search would cannibalize their own business model.
He doesn't sounds like he believes his own words 6:40 - Sorry but people are right. AI will kill traffic. Without a content attribution model baked into LLM system, nobody is going to save most websites with legacy content.
At some point AI Corps maniacs will realise that the "well of information(the web)" is nearing empty and thus their precious AI bots will have limited or zero resources to be trained on. I don't think they are that naïve to think otherwise. Consequently, they will encourage contents to be published and distributed, it's in their interest at the end of the day. AI are dependent on access to old and new information and knowledge and for that they will need content (text, videos, images etc). It's really that simple, they cannot cut off the hand that feeds them.
I know they're two different giants, but in interviews, to me Sundar Pichai often seems insecure and with thin answers, but Satya Nadella seems like navigating known waters, even though Nadella often evades half of the questions. For a tech CEO in this kind of league this is just totally deathly.
I mean I think it's comforting when someone is honest even when it's not purely direct. If there's one thing I've realized watching sadya, Sam and Sundar is that they're all excited for the technology but none of them seem to really have solid set answers for the concerns
Yeah a lot of his answers were basically “I don’t know, but these are my intentions” which I think is honest and I really prefer that over a strongly delivered lie
Love you Nilay for the tough, nuanced, smart questions... Some parts were uncomfortable - and that was a good thing. Weird he said you put "words in his mouth" on something obvious.
The best interview I saw in the AI space. Generally the interviews are super focused on the user, not much about the content creator. Just like the LLMs. I think Google will have a balancing act to play as they have the incentive to do so.
Not only great questions here. Sundar’s answers are explaining his / googles point of view in a (to me) surprisingly honest and thoughtful manner. While he is listening to the questions and the perspectives in the questions he is fairly explaining his point of view and pushing back. Great interview! This was very interesting to me.
Thank me by linking the comment... 00:05 AI search and the future of the web 02:07 Google CEO Sundar Pichai emphasizes the importance of AI search accuracy and increasing capabilities. 06:25 AI search positively impacts user engagement 08:27 Google aims to satisfy user expectations by providing valuable content at scale. 12:34 Google CEO Pichai discusses the impact of AI search on web value 14:35 Google CEO discusses fair use of data for AI search 18:30 Bringing value back to content creators is essential for platforms like UA-cam. 20:14 UA-cam's licensing model and AI approach compared to Google 23:48 Using AI to enhance video effects is valuable. 25:39 AI-generated search can enhance user experience 29:12 AI search adds value and enhances user experience 31:06 Continuous evolution of technology drives innovation in AI search. 34:43 Google CEO Sundar Pichai highlights continuous AI progress and challenges 36:53 AI can help dynamically compose UI for users.
Fantastic interview by the Verge. They didn’t Molly coddle Sundar Pichai. What this man does with Google affects all of our lives significantly. It impacts politics and well being of humanity unironically
I have to be honest his answer about him not seeing it crushing small businesses as a trend caused my blood to boil because literally thousands upon thousands of us have shown the data to prove that it is the case.
No matter how Google I/O came across as Corporate we can’t just ignore the fact that they went all in on the human first aspect of integrating their AI research
It also seems they're at least putting some effort into doing things responsibly. I don't think it's enough and I'm assuming they're being rushed because other companies are going full speed seemingly with no worry about safety
Sundar very non committed and wishy washy, Which tells me that there are a lot of things that they haven't planned for. Including monetization of sources and websites. I think this has a great potential to end in disaster both for Google and the web at large
I remember when I was a teen wanting to work at Google so badly because of how much innovation they had-this was around the time Gmail came out, and I used to ask for Gmail invites back then. Google should get a CEO who will bring them back to that level.
Really want to like this dude but it seems like every hard hitting question niley has is met with "i think that's a very deep question", "im not sure what the perfect solution is" instead of actual logic and reasoning
For a brief moment there, a ray of hope appeared. When Sundar was asked "What does the best version of the web look like 5 years from now?" I misheard his response as: "I hope the web is much richer in terms of morality." My ears pricked up, thinking "wow, I love that his immediate thought was for humanity in 5 years time". Nope! What he meant to say was: "I hope the web is much richer in terms of modality"....
It feels like part of what is missing in this conversation is the recognition/reminder from/to society that Google isn't actually the "Web" or "the Internet" they are a single company that allows people to search and then indexes it. While they are arguably the most important company in he business of the internet, they aren't responsible for making sure people see websites. They are responsible for people getting the information they want. Yes, its in Google's best interest to make sure that those people can make money, but its not thier purpose. They have to make changes to thier business in order to stay current and to continue making sure they are getting people the information they want. Then after they do that, they can see how hat is being used and try to figure out how to help he creators get payed. But they ultimately aren't responsible for the creators getting paid in every move they make.
Fascinating that, when asked about the AI system getting the camera film thing wrong, he doesn't admit that LLM technology and neural nets are simply not able to permit computers to understand the world and how it works. I suppose he can't cop to that, and may not even be familiar with the underlying tech to that level.
Language encodes knowledge, not intelligence. Most searchable text on the internet is factual and therefore, being able to generate new text based on the learnt data, the output also has a good chance to be factual. "Intelligence" is something much harder to capture
From someone who lost all their traffic already- some of these answers infuriate me and feel like pure BS. Great work on the questions, putting him in the fire.
Sundar is navigating a change that is galactic in terms of search and web. He is forced to do this as the world is changing and if Google does not then they will be left behind. I thought he came across as sincere and vulnerable which is a whole lot better than blindingly confident and oblivious to concerns. Solid questions by Nilay.
Great question about incentives that wasn't really answered. If I spend 25 hours writing amazing, high-quality content (as I did) and get results from it, but then Google slashes that traffic through HCU and AI Overview, why would I keep writing those high-quality posts? And once people stop doing that, where will AI Overview take their "inspiration" from? This is a question that's essential and it wasn't at all addressed by Pichai.
Yes and no. This is front page and top of the screen to the most visited site. Bing is undesirable for search, less frequently visited, and locked to one browser.
This was an amazing interview. Very tough and relevant questions. It was good of Sundar to make himself available for it and on the whole he also did exceptionally well in a difficult situation. Probably this is not entirely good for publishers in the end and there's only so much he can say without lying outright. But unfortunately there's really no way for Google to escape the AI tide. If they stuck to the old model, they would just quickly lose the market anyway, which would probably hurt publishers even more. AI is transforming all industries and jobs. We just need to get used to it.
Note the comment, "when we decide to send more traffic to smaller sites", meaning they do make conscious decisions as to where they send traffic and in most cases, they choose not to send traffic to smaller sites...this is not taken out of context, or misunderstood, that is what was said...and the result can be seen across thousands of websites 10:15 mins in...what that means is: small sites stay small, big sites stay big and they keep it that way.
Thank you for asking these questions. My site has been hit hard and it's incredibly sad to see AI answers taking content AND traffic from independent publishers.
Able to appreciate this candour from Sundar a lot more with Nilay's questions, trying not to un-answer everything; much better than just saying a bunch of no-nothings to super hard questions from Bloomberg's Emily Chang. Thank you Nilay for these super grounded questions. Loved the flow. Also, what a beautiful question to start this conversation with. :) PS: It's so hard for a CEO to answer any questions about directions when the org's in a flux. Thanks Sundar for showing this steadiness. :)
Nilay was cooking..these CEO's had always had easy questions and going on tangent fluff speeches about things that really are not measurable.. I believe this was a great interview from both sides. These hard questions need to be answered because they will come up again in the future..
Excellent interview. Amazing how bad you can make a tech CEO look when someone who actually understands what the hell these companies are trying to do with AI asks tough questions, which Sundar really struggled to answer, there was a rather concentrated amount of hand waving going on about the worries of what AI will do to the web
Is the web the final boss that Google has been working its way up to killing all along?
One thing i don't understand is the same guy published why is Google not shipping? And the same guy is saying why is Google shipping
You didn't ask any questions about the new merger of Android, Chrome and hardware teams?
Unless the web becomes a paywall most content is up for grabs by aibots. That's why certain creators give some free content but if you want more there's a subscription.
it's more than the Web.. they want religions, govts, and everything with power... they want it all dead and under their control via AI. Their overlord Klaus Schwab talks about all of it.
@@NadimShaikh-qv7zj that seems like a simple internal management and organising decision, nothing that concerns us and no effect on output of products and services, just my guess
Nilay cooked. He always asks ceos challenging questions. But this one was crazy. Kinda hard to see Sundar struggle so much. But thank you Nilay we need more journalists like you
Agreed, it was interesting to see Sundar struggle through this but it also makes this topic scary for me. It seems like he was pressed on focusing on optimism, that he wasn’t prepared for those hard questions. In my opinion, he should be because these are some real concerns and these are the things Open AI, Microsoft, Google and soon Apple needs to consider.
@@sherlan1886 i dont really see sundar struggle as much as being honest instead of corporate BS. also some questions were framed at a pigeon hole way with singular case/anecdotal and he exercised a fair reframing of the questions
"let's start with an easy one"
I laughed.
Nilay pressed him on some really tough questions, but I think that Sundar also tried to answer him (for the most part). I got the feeling he really wanted to say that if Google didn't switch to "AI Overviews" then other providers using RAG were simply going to eat Google's lunch (but I think he wanted to maintain Google's invincibility). Much better discussion than you normally get from CEO interviews.
The Verge is the number one tech website. They got the power to have interviews like this. Very well done.
Appreciate nilay being okay with asking real questions!!
He's avoiding the critical question being asked. And smaller websites are having a hard time, ofcourse the ''restaurant next door'' is doing very well, because it's sponsored and payed money to be seen. Google doesn't need to know it all, all it needs to do is guide us to the places that provide the information we seek. No Social media app can compare to how fun and informative websites of the past used to be. Google took that away..
Yes! No access journalism here. "Reckless" is thoughtful. Great. inteview. I listened to the whole thing in the car during the workday, but then came back here to watch the video.
Sundar saying ”um uh how do I say this” means this is a good journalism 😂
@@kizanko Vote with your eyeballs. Use another search engine like duck duck go.
let’s not forget to thank the internet overlord CEO for answering the questions and not ending the interview like an elon
You asked some hard questions! He seemed sincerely unsure how to answer a lot of them. Pichai seems completely committed to this current path, which I’m not sold on yet.
Great interview, full of great insights.
I think that's something similar to every ai company right now. They all seem to be excited about the prospects, and don't legitimately trying to deal with possible negatives but still unsure of what will happen etc. it really shows how much of a uncharted territory this is
@@Cevicheliciouswhich is what makes it very very dangerous at the same time. If they are all going into this with just optimism, we are gonna have a major problem in the next few years. Clearly there are negatives and these cannot be ignored.
Giving the CEO of Google your own phone to show him that Google Search is flawed was a move I didn't expect haha
And sundar embracing that with checking the email remark was definitely funny as hell
25:02 Watch the CEO’s face when he starts to pull out the phone 😂
Also, the interviewer laughs at the end of every answer of the CEO like everything is jolly and casual, then dropping another straight faced banger. It’s about time someone ask about the herd of elephants in the room.
Nilay should do all the CEO interviews. Kudos to Sundar for answering all the questions honestly rather than avoiding.
That guy dodged so many questions I'm gonna start calling him Neo Pichai
It's what he's paid $200 million a year for. And yet, he's completely incompetent.
"answering all the questions honestly rather than avoiding"
did we watch the same interview??
Out of all the pichai’s interviews this one feels different and honest.
Did he even answer a single question?
He deeply feels something… is all I heard. Hardly any concrete answers/solutions for creators for all the deep thinking they do at Google.
Bro really said honest
Not all pichai all ceo
In my opinion, Honest is the wrong word but out of all the interviews I have seen this one by far he opened up, Google invented the transformer, I think they have a bigger model than anyone but they got it every time wrong when competing with Open AI, and they can do more, but they have limitations like anti-trust cases, AI safety, etc..., They do have the tools.
everyone wants exciting tools like chat GPT4o and something new the race is on so let's see who wins
Surprisingly weighty questions for a level of CEO that’s usually surrounded by a PR buffer. Good stuff.
Remember kids, there's no such thing as "searching the web". You're only ever searching some company's indexed corpus of the web's content.
Edit: Lots of people in the comments are either not understanding my point (that censorship is inherent in how search engines work), or they believe this point is so obvious that it's not worth stating, which seems naive to me.
Stating the obvious much
There’s no such thing as “using your phone” you’re only using some company’s assembled product… very unintelligent take
This!!!!
@@chris_ibeyou are wrong. Google gives you the web they want you to see. If you make a Website and Google doesn't want people to see it then it won't show up in search.
Google isn't the only thing that exists @@andrevshimself
Nice questions, finally an interview that wasn't catered to make the interviewee look good. The answers on the other hand weren't that nice, seems like Sundar didn't even have a straight answer in the first place for many of them.
He guess he hinted it , in transition you will see a lot of unknowns and many of the users don't know how to use it properly (Including himself?).
That's because of questions related, how it's gonna be in future or 5 years from now... how can Sundar Pichai predict that accurately... only presume / assume... but I appreciate the honesty of Sundar Pichai, always....
It seems the job of a CEO is to find the best non answer to every question
That's the function of the comms team usually😅
07:01 wow the answer that Sundar gave to Nilay was really just ‘this is the end of an era’.
Interview Tim and Craig again after WWDC please
apple isn't open to unscripted interviews lol
lol indeed.
Just don't let them see this interview, first 🤣 (Or they might not show up)
That’s true although he asked some hard hitting questions Sundar gave an unscripted interview
Not sure if Apple can ever do this
Nilay did a great job asking tough questions without excessively grilling Sundar to the point where he became defensive, although his answers to many questions weren't great, the interview itself was conducted well.
Great interviewing. It’s important that these companies get grilled
Thanks to the Verge team for adding the slides for the referenced articles in the video!
Great hard interview .... great work team
15 mins in and bro is asking BANGER questions, between this and the apple Vision... tells me the verge has NO fear lmao
Finally an interviewer asking hard questions! Wish there were answers but appreciate the great efforts of the verge team.
This interview didn't do much to quell my sense that Pichai is completely out of his depth. The question-dodging is not unexpected. I don't like it, but CEO gonna CEO. What's far more damning here are all the questions he appears to be completely unprepared for. I'm sure he's a smart dude - you don't just fail upwards into his role - but there really are times he comes across inarticulate and out of his depth. I've never seen a company's products be allowed to fall from grace so miserably. If AI is the direction he wants to go then do it! But to launch products before they're ready while allowing the existing products and services that they're replacing to devolve so dramatically that they're utterly unusable while the replacement is not up to scratch only leaves your users with an ecosystem where nothing works. This breeds resentment towards your brand and sends users looking for a replacement ecosystem. I genuinely think we're witnessing the biggest corporate fumble in modern history.
yeah, you're making really good points here - Sundar's unpreparedness in that interview is eerily reflective of how Google was caught off guard by OpenAI in recent years. I don't think they will go down but they will likely loose the leadership in the tech world - they already lost as a tech innovator for sure.
when he started getting catty you could tell hes def out of his depth
Clearly Sundar should do more layoffs to protect his pockets
/s
Google is scrambling to move fast but they are a VAST organization with many layers and this is the reality of mega corporations trying to “pivot” against this disruption
You absolutely fail upwards because the guys who go upwards aren’t the ones who do good things for users it’s the ones who make a lot of money for other people
After a loooong time watching a real interview!
Best opening interview questions ever.
Really good interview; excellent questions!!
This should be a template for how all interviews with Tech CEOs should be. Honestly, just great.
Thanks verge for making first real interview on your channel and AI related in general
This is a true no-bulshhit conversation. Nilay has real life things at stake here. I live for these kinds of interviews.
Eli is not pulling his punches. Great.
Its Nilay.
I think it's Nelly, actually
@@BryceDriesenga its Eli lily
It’s cheese cake, actually
Never seen such a raw and on point interview in a long time.
This is an excellent interview!
The Bloomberg interview felt like it was heavily scrutinized by Google.
P.S. Having listened to the interview and having processed it, here's what I think is the primary problem with Pichai continuing to lead this monstrosity of an entity that's Google: He lacks opinions and visions that are his own. Unlike, say, Musk or Sama, Pichai doesn't seem to have any strong opinions about anything. He seems like a robot, reacting to the things happening around it according to its programming. That works when everything is going well and there's no competition, but backfires when you're required to innovate. Whenever some critical question (that didn't require technicalities but were more of a moral/philosophical question) was asked, he defaulted to "i don't know, i'll have to ask my team". I think that's a huge problem. I think that my point can be proven by the fact that google services have been becoming increasingly buggy and unreliable. They've also cancelled some incredible projects that had the potential of becoming massive if only they could keep pushing through and taken some minor losses for a few initial years. That's the result of someone who lacks vision and passion.
To be fair, Google is a massive conglemerate a many business units. To have granular opinions on all topics seems like a tall order to fill. I agree that he needs to be more decisive and have a “go forward” vision. But this level of disruption is a dance with one foot in the future and one future in the “current state” since AI first search would cannibalize their own business model.
He doesn't sounds like he believes his own words 6:40 - Sorry but people are right. AI will kill traffic. Without a content attribution model baked into LLM system, nobody is going to save most websites with legacy content.
At some point AI Corps maniacs will realise that the "well of information(the web)" is nearing empty and thus their precious AI bots will have limited or zero resources to be trained on. I don't think they are that naïve to think otherwise.
Consequently, they will encourage contents to be published and distributed, it's in their interest at the end of the day.
AI are dependent on access to old and new information and knowledge and for that they will need content (text, videos, images etc). It's really that simple, they cannot cut off the hand that feeds them.
Not quite off topic, interviewers like this should be the ones who quiz our political candidates.
Great interview! Please keep uploading Decoder to UA-cam!
hard hitting questions. excellent interview!
I know they're two different giants, but in interviews, to me Sundar Pichai often seems insecure and with thin answers, but Satya Nadella seems like navigating known waters, even though Nadella often evades half of the questions. For a tech CEO in this kind of league this is just totally deathly.
I mean I think it's comforting when someone is honest even when it's not purely direct. If there's one thing I've realized watching sadya, Sam and Sundar is that they're all excited for the technology but none of them seem to really have solid set answers for the concerns
Satya is more charismatic.
Yeah a lot of his answers were basically “I don’t know, but these are my intentions” which I think is honest and I really prefer that over a strongly delivered lie
Nadella is overrated ASF.
Great interview!! You asked some difficult questions
No one asks the tough questions like Nilay. What an interview!
Thanks for asking the questions we all want to hear answers to! Not sure he really answered them, but thanks for putting them out there!
Nilay you're one of the best journalists that I've ever heard. Glad to be a fan since the early 2010s!
Love you Nilay for the tough, nuanced, smart questions... Some parts were uncomfortable - and that was a good thing. Weird he said you put "words in his mouth" on something obvious.
40 minutes of Silicon Valley NPC spitting tech jargon 😍
Nilay has outdone himself with this interview. Great, direct questions and on point. Excellent!
The best interview I saw in the AI space. Generally the interviews are super focused on the user, not much about the content creator. Just like the LLMs. I think Google will have a balancing act to play as they have the incentive to do so.
Really awesome interview! Definitely great to see Sundar come down from his ivory tower and discuss things in this format.
Great interview and props to the CEO for answering these tough questions.
Now I want to see Apple agree to a tough interview like this after WWDC!
Not only great questions here. Sundar’s answers are explaining his / googles point of view in a (to me) surprisingly honest and thoughtful manner. While he is listening to the questions and the perspectives in the questions he is fairly explaining his point of view and pushing back. Great interview! This was very interesting to me.
Amazing questions from Nilay pushing back at Google. It's scary how far companies are willing to go to become so dominant.
im scared we wont have things like the verge in the future at least not freely avaliable . Great work Nilay and the team
Is this an interview or an interrogation??
What makes you say that? Interested to know
Nilay has the best questions of all journalists out there.
Excellent interview!
Very interesting to see an interview challenging the guest, especially on crucial topics.
Thank me by linking the comment...
00:05 AI search and the future of the web
02:07 Google CEO Sundar Pichai emphasizes the importance of AI search accuracy and increasing capabilities.
06:25 AI search positively impacts user engagement
08:27 Google aims to satisfy user expectations by providing valuable content at scale.
12:34 Google CEO Pichai discusses the impact of AI search on web value
14:35 Google CEO discusses fair use of data for AI search
18:30 Bringing value back to content creators is essential for platforms like UA-cam.
20:14 UA-cam's licensing model and AI approach compared to Google
23:48 Using AI to enhance video effects is valuable.
25:39 AI-generated search can enhance user experience
29:12 AI search adds value and enhances user experience
31:06 Continuous evolution of technology drives innovation in AI search.
34:43 Google CEO Sundar Pichai highlights continuous AI progress and challenges
36:53 AI can help dynamically compose UI for users.
Fantastic interview by the Verge. They didn’t Molly coddle Sundar Pichai. What this man does with Google affects all of our lives significantly. It impacts politics and well being of humanity unironically
Nilay always straight forward.... never shying away from that.....
I have to be honest his answer about him not seeing it crushing small businesses as a trend caused my blood to boil because literally thousands upon thousands of us have shown the data to prove that it is the case.
No matter how Google I/O came across as Corporate we can’t just ignore the fact that they went all in on the human first aspect of integrating their AI research
It also seems they're at least putting some effort into doing things responsibly. I don't think it's enough and I'm assuming they're being rushed because other companies are going full speed seemingly with no worry about safety
Great questions. It did not seem like Sundar could be completely intellectually honest with his answers.
Which makes sense, but just what i noticed
Sundar very non committed and wishy washy, Which tells me that there are a lot of things that they haven't planned for. Including monetization of sources and websites. I think this has a great potential to end in disaster both for Google and the web at large
I remember when I was a teen wanting to work at Google so badly because of how much innovation they had-this was around the time Gmail came out, and I used to ask for Gmail invites back then. Google should get a CEO who will bring them back to that level.
Really want to like this dude but it seems like every hard hitting question niley has is met with "i think that's a very deep question", "im not sure what the perfect solution is" instead of actual logic and reasoning
Not Pichai giving politician answers.
I mean, Google has more employees than many politicians have constituents, so it tracks. Not to mention the number of customers
For a brief moment there, a ray of hope appeared.
When Sundar was asked "What does the best version of the web look like 5 years from now?"
I misheard his response as:
"I hope the web is much richer in terms of morality."
My ears pricked up, thinking "wow, I love that his immediate thought was for humanity in 5 years time".
Nope!
What he meant to say was:
"I hope the web is much richer in terms of modality"....
Same here.
Where is the Brother printer question 😹
But fantastic questions and kudos to Sundar for balancing diplomatic and realistic answer
It feels like part of what is missing in this conversation is the recognition/reminder from/to society that Google isn't actually the "Web" or "the Internet" they are a single company that allows people to search and then indexes it. While they are arguably the most important company in he business of the internet, they aren't responsible for making sure people see websites. They are responsible for people getting the information they want. Yes, its in Google's best interest to make sure that those people can make money, but its not thier purpose. They have to make changes to thier business in order to stay current and to continue making sure they are getting people the information they want. Then after they do that, they can see how hat is being used and try to figure out how to help he creators get payed. But they ultimately aren't responsible for the creators getting paid in every move they make.
Fascinating that, when asked about the AI system getting the camera film thing wrong, he doesn't admit that LLM technology and neural nets are simply not able to permit computers to understand the world and how it works. I suppose he can't cop to that, and may not even be familiar with the underlying tech to that level.
The way Sundar's answers start with 'that's a really good question' proves Nilay cares so so much about the web!
Language encodes knowledge, not intelligence.
Most searchable text on the internet is factual and therefore, being able to generate new text based on the learnt data, the output also has a good chance to be factual. "Intelligence" is something much harder to capture
"We put * insert any type of user * at the center". The dude as the most corporate answers possible it's frustrating
God damn, this interview went hard. Good job team lol
This is probably the best Tech CEO interview I have seen. Great questions! 😊
Pichai is always so professional in interviews and his speeches
Here after hearing this recommend on Waveform podcast. It didn’t disappoint
What is the counter on the word"ecosystem" in this interview.
From someone who lost all their traffic already- some of these answers infuriate me and feel like pure BS. Great work on the questions, putting him in the fire.
Very well done interview. Straight to the point.
Great interview
Brutal questions by Nilay Patel
Sundar is navigating a change that is galactic in terms of search and web. He is forced to do this as the world is changing and if Google does not then they will be left behind. I thought he came across as sincere and vulnerable which is a whole lot better than blindingly confident and oblivious to concerns. Solid questions by Nilay.
Great question about incentives that wasn't really answered.
If I spend 25 hours writing amazing, high-quality content (as I did) and get results from it, but then Google slashes that traffic through HCU and AI Overview, why would I keep writing those high-quality posts?
And once people stop doing that, where will AI Overview take their "inspiration" from? This is a question that's essential and it wasn't at all addressed by Pichai.
If they don’t integrate AI in their search, they are in danger. This is not really an option for them.
This is one of the best interviewers I've seen in a long time
Excellent questions, Nilay. None of them were “gotchas”; they were all very important to where we are as an industry and as a species.
wonderful interview nilay! these questions need to be asked by lawmakers and other large business owners
isn't ai search already in bing copilot ??
Yes and no. This is front page and top of the screen to the most visited site. Bing is undesirable for search, less frequently visited, and locked to one browser.
@@CarlosVixil bing can be used on chrome and edge. It isn't locked to a single browser.
This was an amazing interview. Very tough and relevant questions. It was good of Sundar to make himself available for it and on the whole he also did exceptionally well in a difficult situation. Probably this is not entirely good for publishers in the end and there's only so much he can say without lying outright. But unfortunately there's really no way for Google to escape the AI tide. If they stuck to the old model, they would just quickly lose the market anyway, which would probably hurt publishers even more. AI is transforming all industries and jobs. We just need to get used to it.
Hell of an interview Nilay!
wow this was an actuallly good interview nilay!!
Note the comment, "when we decide to send more traffic to smaller sites", meaning they do make conscious decisions as to where they send traffic and in most cases, they choose not to send traffic to smaller sites...this is not taken out of context, or misunderstood, that is what was said...and the result can be seen across thousands of websites 10:15 mins in...what that means is: small sites stay small, big sites stay big and they keep it that way.
This is a very good interview, well done.
Love this interview. Asked questions I hadn't even considered.
It's on par with level of interviewing tech ceos, others or just chitchats.
Nilay always enjoy. Thanks for sharing. 💯✌️
This teaches us that technological advancements should always align with user needs and content quality to be truly effective.
Nilay’s best interview work by far 👍
I’m really impressed by the questions asked. Well done
Thank you for asking these questions. My site has been hit hard and it's incredibly sad to see AI answers taking content AND traffic from independent publishers.
This was a great interview.
Able to appreciate this candour from Sundar a lot more with Nilay's questions, trying not to un-answer everything; much better than just saying a bunch of no-nothings to super hard questions from Bloomberg's Emily Chang. Thank you Nilay for these super grounded questions. Loved the flow. Also, what a beautiful question to start this conversation with. :)
PS: It's so hard for a CEO to answer any questions about directions when the org's in a flux. Thanks Sundar for showing this steadiness. :)
Nilay was cooking..these CEO's had always had easy questions and going on tangent fluff speeches about things that really are not measurable.. I believe this was a great interview from both sides. These hard questions need to be answered because they will come up again in the future..
3:26 I love this man. Brilliant response. Gemini is fully reliable and has a great sense of humor and personality.
I had a nice time watching this Interview :)
Excellent interview. Amazing how bad you can make a tech CEO look when someone who actually understands what the hell these companies are trying to do with AI asks tough questions, which Sundar really struggled to answer, there was a rather concentrated amount of hand waving going on about the worries of what AI will do to the web