‘Political with a capital P’: Andrew Weissmann calls out Supreme Court over Trump Immunity claim

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 кві 2024
  • Andrew Weissmann, former top prosecutor at the Justice Department joins Nicolle Wallace on Deadline White House with to preview the Supreme Court hearing the Presidential Immunity claim by Donald Trump which conservative legal experts acknowledge is frivolous and also calling into question why the Supreme Court slow walked the process of settling this issue.
    » Subscribe to MSNBC: / msnbc
    Download our new MSNBC app for the latest breaking news and daily headlines at a glance: www.msnbc.com/information/dow...
    Follow MSNBC Show Blogs
    MaddowBlog: www.msnbc.com/maddowblog
    ReidOut Blog: www.msnbc.com/reidoutblog
    MSNBC delivers breaking news, in-depth analysis of politics headlines, as well as commentary and informed perspectives. Find video clips and segments from The Rachel Maddow Show, Morning Joe, The Beat with Ari Melber, Deadline: White House, The ReidOut, All In, Last Word, 11th Hour, and Alex Wagner who brings her breadth of reporting experience to MSNBC primetime. Watch “Alex Wagner Tonight” Tuesday through Friday at 9pm Eastern.
    Connect with MSNBC Online
    Visit msnbc.com: www.msnbc.com/
    Subscribe to the MSNBC Daily Newsletter: link.msnbc.com/join/5ck/msnbc...
    Find MSNBC on Facebook: / msnbc
    Follow MSNBC on Twitter: / msnbc
    Follow MSNBC on Instagram: / msnbc
    #Trump #donaldtrump #immunity

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2,1 тис.

  • @peterfreiling6963
    @peterfreiling6963 9 днів тому +421

    The Supreme Court today is an absolute disgrace. Chief Justice Roberts, are you listening?

    • @ttomgast1769
      @ttomgast1769 9 днів тому

      The John Roberts Supreme Court . The worse United States Supreme Court in history .

    • @marshcreek4355
      @marshcreek4355 9 днів тому

      Why do we continue to think that John Roberts is willing to save us and Scotus itself? He's quite willing to buttress the "5's" corruption. He really doesn't care about any so called reputational damage to the Court. Life time appointments and an overarching arrogance too many of them seem to have will do that for you.

    • @james6901
      @james6901 9 днів тому +22

      he will listen,,,,,,,when stripped of everything....your dupreme court is a mockery.....greetings from SCOTLAND

    • @carmelaguanciale6620
      @carmelaguanciale6620 9 днів тому +18

      He doesn’t care.

    • @birdsndog5819
      @birdsndog5819 9 днів тому +6

      @@carmelaguanciale6620- doesn’t have to. Unfortunately.

  • @keneaton2855
    @keneaton2855 9 днів тому +220

    When I was growing up the idea of a corrupt Supreme Court was something I never thought I would see in my lifetime. How wrong I was!

    • @veggieman357
      @veggieman357 9 днів тому +8

      I had the same thought...

    • @selah71
      @selah71 9 днів тому

      I think a few of them are compromised. When Biden wins and if the US keeps the Democrats as the majority in the Senate, I suspect he'll add more justices.

    • @JohnL-qe4pi
      @JohnL-qe4pi 9 днів тому

      You apparently don't know the meaning of the word corrupt. You are guilty of aiding and abetting a corrupt and criminal Democrat Party simply by giving them your vote. Judge Cannon's UNREDACTING of Jack's papers PROVE the CRIMINALITY of Biden, Wray, Garland, Smith, and a BOATLOAD of other Agency heads who have PRISON sentences to look forward to next year! HAHAHA! TRUMP2024!!

    • @mick_5552
      @mick_5552 9 днів тому

      They should be indicted for undermining the justice system. A few need to be charged for accepting money and gifts from right wing maga millionaires.

    • @cyber-psych2503
      @cyber-psych2503 9 днів тому

      was sorta of or better concealed, look at the mid 1800 Dread Scott case, and before that, when Chief Justice John Marshall absolved alt-right Arron Burr of obvious treason in 1812 ish period

  • @rzipper1716
    @rzipper1716 9 днів тому +98

    When do checks and balances get applied to the Supreme Court ??? If no one is above the law, why isn't Thomas being investigated for bribery ???

    • @dmann1115
      @dmann1115 9 днів тому +9

      It's an excellent, excellent question. I don't know of anything in the Constitution providing for oversight beyond a couple of Congressional committees that lack the authority to remove a rogue justce.

    • @Chez8922-kf6cy
      @Chez8922-kf6cy 9 днів тому

      No enforceable code of ethics, Lifetime appointments, and no way to impeach them. They are untouchable.

    • @thoughtfortheday7811
      @thoughtfortheday7811 8 днів тому +4

      Exactly! Who judges the judges?

    • @mugenx3340
      @mugenx3340 8 днів тому

      shh you're not suppose to ask those questions...just be a good little obedient American and let them shaft you.

    • @stevendunn7928
      @stevendunn7928 8 днів тому +3

      Making them unaccountable in hopes of avoiding politicization really isn't working out.

  • @paradisemeco7121
    @paradisemeco7121 9 днів тому +138

    This court will go in history on the wrong side. It is shameful

    • @nakedreef
      @nakedreef 9 днів тому +5

      It sure will!

    • @stevenaarontyler9552
      @stevenaarontyler9552 9 днів тому

      They don't care.They are part of a secret society and financial enrichment and legacy wealth is their ultimate goal

    • @dottio3830
      @dottio3830 9 днів тому +7

      uh...that happened with the reversal of Roe V Wade

    • @JohnL-qe4pi
      @JohnL-qe4pi 9 днів тому

      Pure BS! We now have the best SCOTUS in my lifetime! They are the FIREWALL between a free America and a COMMUNIST Democrat Party! MAGATRUMP2024!!

    • @jlighter1
      @jlighter1 9 днів тому +3

      There's really so many things this court could get recorded in history as on the wrong side of.

  • @Dustandfuzz
    @Dustandfuzz 9 днів тому +269

    Any court with any sense would not have anybody immune from prosecution of crimes committed, even a president.

    • @Ryan-Fkrepublicnz
      @Ryan-Fkrepublicnz 9 днів тому +5

      EXACTLY. We DO have a vice president. Of course the DOJ (the organization under the power of the president ) seems to think that a president cannot be indicted while in office-- sure looks a little bit self defining....

    • @james6901
      @james6901 9 днів тому

      Adolf,,,,was immune,,musolini,,,sadam etc etc according to american SUPREME court.....greetings from Edinburgh,,,,america your system is a disgrace

    • @scabcrawler632
      @scabcrawler632 9 днів тому +1

      Rip brokeback obama and his husband

    • @nadineprescott-me5pf
      @nadineprescott-me5pf 9 днів тому +4

      they've set it up so they will never be held accountable for their own crimes. they're immoral, not stupid!

    • @hanapapercuts
      @hanapapercuts 9 днів тому +1

      well, we’ll see and if they think 60% disapproval is bad….

  • @lance7607
    @lance7607 9 днів тому +506

    It's so ridiculous that the Supreme Court is wasting its time on this.

    • @ttomgast1769
      @ttomgast1769 9 днів тому +46

      Seems intentional , doesn't it ?

    • @ik7482
      @ik7482 9 днів тому +30

      because they ARE ridiculous!

    • @james6901
      @james6901 9 днів тому +13

      lance,,,dear oh dear......you think its a court? oh you innocent

    • @user-ei8do4uq4j
      @user-ei8do4uq4j 9 днів тому +10

      The Supreme Court should be looking into the insider trading that is making politicians in congress rich.... nobody is above the law... lol

    • @user-ei8do4uq4j
      @user-ei8do4uq4j 9 днів тому +11

      What about if the Supreme Court looked at the reason members of congress trade stocks with a better success rate than artificial intelligence and the best stock brokers in the world.

  • @loveholidaybyviction1272
    @loveholidaybyviction1272 9 днів тому +53

    The fact that the supreme court is taking this on tells you how broken our system really is

  • @fionakelleghan3267
    @fionakelleghan3267 9 днів тому +29

    Mitch McConnell prevented Barack Obama from appointing any Supreme Court judges. Sigh. Oh man, I miss Obama.

  • @tpliscon4662
    @tpliscon4662 9 днів тому +823

    mcconnell forced several judges on scrotus. He's to blame for this mess. Now he gets to retire with a massive golden parachute.
    Makes me sick.

    • @brendamackinnon1978
      @brendamackinnon1978 9 днів тому +31

      Trump put some of the Supreme Court judges in there!

    • @purem9150
      @purem9150 9 днів тому +73

      The Swamp is definitely the GOP.

    • @lynnrunningdeer7364
      @lynnrunningdeer7364 9 днів тому +52

      ​@@brendamackinnon1978that's what they said. Without mcturtle none of it would have been possible.

    • @lynnrunningdeer7364
      @lynnrunningdeer7364 9 днів тому +19

      Six days later and he's pushing up daisies😅.

    • @rebeccadinsmore4617
      @rebeccadinsmore4617 9 днів тому +31

      That WE pay for. Makes me sick.

  • @bobwelke3308
    @bobwelke3308 9 днів тому +445

    The concept of Presidential "immunity" is beyond reason, beyond common sense, beyond history, beyond the law. The fact that the Supreme Court would even consider the issue is worrisome to anyone who values our democracy.

    • @oooolah
      @oooolah 9 днів тому +34

      As a kid, we learned about the separation of powers, so that one was not stronger than the other. It's insane to me to think that such a basic concept that was taught in grade school is under question.

    • @davidrhinehart7764
      @davidrhinehart7764 9 днів тому

      If a president doesn't have immunity, obama can be charged with murder in the assassination of two American citizens who had not been charged with any crime. One was only 16. Do you still want to do awaywith immunity?

    • @DebORahDramatica
      @DebORahDramatica 9 днів тому

      GET TO THE COURTHOUSE AND FILE A REPORT!🤬​@@davidrhinehart7764

    • @cbrashsorensen
      @cbrashsorensen 9 днів тому

      Well the "Supremes" DO NOT value anything but their power-over the entire populace of the United States. What else have you got?

    • @markwomack1561
      @markwomack1561 9 днів тому +13

      Absolutely! Choices have repercussions. Good and bad. It's called accountability. It's a human thing.

  • @carmelaguanciale6620
    @carmelaguanciale6620 9 днів тому +53

    Term limits for SCOTUS. Starting with corrupt Alito and corrupt Thomas

  • @danpoole4915
    @danpoole4915 9 днів тому +19

    This is where we are. Time to choose. Freedom or slavery. Democracy or dictatorship. Time to act. To vote.

    • @CallumMoscript
      @CallumMoscript 7 днів тому

      We needed to show up and vote in 2016, but failed.

  • @deadshaper1
    @deadshaper1 9 днів тому +123

    The 3 judge lower court's decision was correct by law. Most objective attorneys will tell you the decision for SCOTUS to agree to hear this case is purely political & ludicrous.

    • @dmann1115
      @dmann1115 9 днів тому +10

      Not to mention extremely fascist and dangerous.

    • @sam-zm5zw
      @sam-zm5zw 9 днів тому

      They'll make a ruling after the election. So sad.

  • @jay4you853
    @jay4you853 9 днів тому +188

    We must find a way to get rid of this extremist court... they've done enough damage!!

    • @roberts1918
      @roberts1918 9 днів тому

      It’s really republicans who have done the damage. They are responsible for the state of our Supreme Court, our do nothing Congress and the Orange Lie Monster.

    • @adamdavis2035
      @adamdavis2035 9 днів тому +1

      Insurrection!

    • @ridethecurve55
      @ridethecurve55 9 днів тому +6

      MAGASCOTUS: Support for Trump and Contempt for the American People. This Will NOT STAND!

    • @xlaw6272
      @xlaw6272 9 днів тому +1

      Good luck.
      This is the ultimate consequence of presidential elections…
      When people claim their votes don’t matter…remind them of Clarence Thomas…Samuel Alito…Gorsuch…Cohen-Barrett…Roberts…

    • @BROU-bb2uc
      @BROU-bb2uc 9 днів тому +1

      ​@@ridethecurve55oh but if it was the other way you would be happy 😂

  • @marthahines1979
    @marthahines1979 9 днів тому +8

    Mr. Weissman is CORRECT. This court is a mess and we need major reform. Let’s start with term limits.

  • @casperitwas
    @casperitwas 9 днів тому +11

    This is stunning !!!!!!
    What Andrew Weissman is stating in the latter half of this video is stunning beyond belief for its naked truth - staring Americans in the eye and yet . . .

  • @shiva2731
    @shiva2731 9 днів тому +204

    They have already wasted an unimaginable amount of time by letting him get away with this question unanswered. How inept!

    • @cbrashsorensen
      @cbrashsorensen 9 днів тому

      Inept - without skill or aptitude for a particular task or assignment. NOPE...the delay is ON PURPOSE to give trump a big step toward stealing the election in November and making sure his AG drops all these pesky coup and treason cases.

    • @stopthecrazyguy9948
      @stopthecrazyguy9948 9 днів тому +15

      Corrupt is the word you are looking for.

    • @Ryan-Fkrepublicnz
      @Ryan-Fkrepublicnz 9 днів тому +3

      that was THE POINT

    • @jryecart8017
      @jryecart8017 9 днів тому

      ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ ya got no facts .... again - - - "Many fine people"
      During the 1993 Senate confirmation hearing for Supreme Court nominee Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Chairman Biden of the Senate Judiciary Committee made a commented about the United Daughters of the Confederacy (UDC), an organization committed to preserving Confederate statues with ties to the Ku Klux Klan.
      Biden began his remarks by referring to a speech made on the Senate floor by Sen. Howell Heflin (D-Ala.), who was speaking in support of efforts by Sen. Carol Moseley Braun (D-Ill.) to deny renewal of a Confederate flag design patent to the UDC.
      “I, too, heard that speech and, for the public listening to this, the senator made a very moving and eloquent speech. As a son of the Confederacy, acknowledging that it was time to change and yield to a position that Sen. Carol Moseley-Braun raised on the Senate floor, not granting a federal charter to an organization made up of many fine people who continue to display the Confederate flag as a symbol.

    • @danpoole4915
      @danpoole4915 9 днів тому +9

      Not inept. Corrupt..

  • @gregleichner2220
    @gregleichner2220 9 днів тому +175

    Why obey a Supreme Court that has squandered all of their respect?

    • @brucevandermeulen4170
      @brucevandermeulen4170 9 днів тому +3

      You have NO idea what you're saying. The Court is going by the Constitution and previous decisions which have been found to be lawful. Sounds like you're angry because it didn't go the way you and your cronies wanted!!!!!!

    • @spir5102
      @spir5102 9 днів тому

      @@brucevandermeulen4170 are you saying when the Supreme Court, namely clearance Thomas and justice Alito have been bribed by billionaires, that’s in the constitution?

    • @thjbird
      @thjbird 9 днів тому +4

      Because they are there for the power, and that’s all that matters to them.

    • @Chez8922-kf6cy
      @Chez8922-kf6cy 9 днів тому +1

      They have no credibility anymore. They are ignoring the Constitution. And worse yet they are untouchable.

    • @michaeljohnangel6359
      @michaeljohnangel6359 9 днів тому

      @@brucevandermeulen4170 I'm afraid it's you who have no idea what you're saying. The corruption of this Court is manifest.

  • @toritori5835
    @toritori5835 9 днів тому +22

    Why is there no accountability for all the justices who lied about Roe v. Wade during their vetting?
    Had legislators known they’d do that, there is no way they would have approved the nomination.
    And Thomas still not recusing himself after his own wife was implicated. Horrible.

    • @nakedreef
      @nakedreef 9 днів тому +1

      Exactly!!! I've been waiting for that subject to come up. Kavanaugh goes 1st.

    • @jamesbarnes3832
      @jamesbarnes3832 9 днів тому

      One would assume that it is illegal to lie to Congress.
      However the impeachment process is the same as far as I know.
      The House would have to vote to impeach.
      Then 2/3rds of the of the Senate would have to vote for removal.
      However:
      Article II, Section 4: The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
      Some of these Trumpian members of the Supreme Court have been bribed, but they haven't bribed anyone.
      If a public official accepts money to do, or not do, an official act, they can be charged with bribery - even if they don't follow through with what was asked, or if they would have done what was asked anyway.
      So there are are multiple members of the Supreme Court that could be impeached and stand trial in the Senate.
      Current House? No hope of the impeachment of a Trumpian member of the Supreme Court.
      2/3rds of the Senate voting for their removal with the current Senate now infiltrated by more Trumpians and insurrectionists? Not going to happen.
      The corrupt defend the corrupt.

    • @CallumMoscript
      @CallumMoscript 7 днів тому

      republicans, led by Mitch McConnell, would have still pushed them through

  • @user-jh9ip3vp9s
    @user-jh9ip3vp9s 9 днів тому +6

    We have a right to have honest justices with integrity. We also have a right to dismiss corruption on our Supreme Court.

  • @patti21125150
    @patti21125150 9 днів тому +75

    They never should have taken this case. The Appellate court gave them the perfect out!!

    • @nakedreef
      @nakedreef 9 днів тому +4

      THey wanted it because THEY are crooked.

    • @sam-zm5zw
      @sam-zm5zw 9 днів тому

      They'll rule that Presidents don't have absolute immunity, after the election. Sad.

    • @kylesimmons3674
      @kylesimmons3674 9 днів тому +3

      @@nakedreefand because Clarance Thomas and his wife are trump’s buddies

  • @sheilawilliamsshafer3391
    @sheilawilliamsshafer3391 9 днів тому +105

    To the Supreme Court from this American..."Shame on y'all - SHAME, SHAME, SHAME ON ALL OF Y'ALL"!!

    • @nakedreef
      @nakedreef 9 днів тому +5

      I'm standing with you.

    • @AM-fs1je
      @AM-fs1je 9 днів тому +5

      Billionaire-owned Extreme Court

    • @yellowwducky
      @yellowwducky 9 днів тому +5

      well shame on the republican justices (yes they are republican)

  • @brockroberts4258
    @brockroberts4258 9 днів тому +6

    Man, Thank you, Andrew for explaining this whole debacle in such simple but eloquent terms.

  • @davidcobby8609
    @davidcobby8609 9 днів тому +13

    Unfortunately there is no mechanism to hold the Supreme Court in contempt of the Constitution.

  • @myberney
    @myberney 9 днів тому +141

    THEY THINK WE ARE STUPID

    • @cbrashsorensen
      @cbrashsorensen 9 днів тому

      No...the "Supremes" know they have power-over the U.S. populace and enjoy having their boot on our neck.

    • @user-ei8do4uq4j
      @user-ei8do4uq4j 9 днів тому +5

      You are. You say nobody is above the law while the legislative branch trades stocks of companies that their votes influence. That's illegal for you and me. But nobody is above the law?

    • @scabcrawler632
      @scabcrawler632 9 днів тому +1

      You are for sure

    • @brucevandermeulen4170
      @brucevandermeulen4170 9 днів тому

      You are!!!!

  • @raymondkymsuttle
    @raymondkymsuttle 9 днів тому +173

    It’s ridiculous that there’s no way to hold the Supreme Court justices accountable for their rulings that go against the wishes of most Americans.

    • @user-iz5sl8hu1y
      @user-iz5sl8hu1y 9 днів тому

      Unless they happen to be coconspirators in an attempt to overthrow democracy….. ask Thomas and his wife

    • @james6901
      @james6901 9 днів тому +8

      oh but there is......if decent americans have the balls for it

    • @micheleconner5083
      @micheleconner5083 9 днів тому +3

      Wish there was a way to appeal them!! Take it to congress?

    • @Doodelz02
      @Doodelz02 9 днів тому

      I believe it's "impeachment", but that's case by case. Need to also think about sanctioning their confirmation hearings:
      - evade a direct question? Disqualified. Instantly. Do not pass "go". Do not get black robe!
      - change your stated position from what you said at the hearing (without first explaining "why" to your citizens?) Boom. Boot and replace.
      - abide by the exact same standards for all courts below with respect to "accepting no gifts" and "appropriately recuseing" (looking to you, Thomas)
      None of this political nonsense either. No witholding house/senate voting. Straight "up or down" vote (60%+ carries). No secret voting. Names required.

    • @savageinstitute9569
      @savageinstitute9569 9 днів тому +4

      Checks and balances were not meant to he run like Twitter polls buddy

  • @ginadv5288
    @ginadv5288 9 днів тому +8

    Justice Clarence Thomas should be removed from this panel..for all he and his
    witch of a wife..have done...NOT FAIR he is still there😮
    Great work Nicole🏆

    • @nakedreef
      @nakedreef 9 днів тому +3

      😡I mean it's unbelievable that she participated in the insurrection, and not a GD thing has happened to her!!! And I wonder Why My Blood Pressure is high now??! 🤬

  • @MartaWomack
    @MartaWomack 9 днів тому +6

    HOW can we possibly ever trust the Supremes to have America's back after this?! Term limits should be placed on Scotus, asap.

    • @nakedreef
      @nakedreef 9 днів тому

      NO one will ever have trust in them again. I NEVER will until they are IMPEACHED & REMOVED. I want more of them investigated thoroughly.

    • @AM-fs1je
      @AM-fs1je 9 днів тому

      Billionaire-owned Extreme Court

  • @kimbercole2438
    @kimbercole2438 9 днів тому +248

    That bunch should be dissolved - roberts, Kavanagh, barrett, Thomas, alito, gorsuch - get rid of them, they are absolutely wrong! They're playing politics and that is NOT their job!

    • @itsmybuddha.nature
      @itsmybuddha.nature 9 днів тому +26

      Take back both houses, keep the White House and do like trump ... PACK THE COURTS.
      VOTE BLUE🌊⚖️

    • @user-rv7zz2to8w
      @user-rv7zz2to8w 9 днів тому

      Your sides judge said that the 1st amendment hamstrings the government.. That was the disgraceful diversity hire Judge Jackson. That would be playing politics as well.

    • @nakedreef
      @nakedreef 9 днів тому

      I totally agree!!! They are 💩💩💩💩💩💩

    • @garydhaese7318
      @garydhaese7318 9 днів тому +1

      Impeach or charge when there is evidence of corruption?

    • @shellimendoza7332
      @shellimendoza7332 9 днів тому +1

      💯 but how?

  • @TherealHazlett
    @TherealHazlett 9 днів тому +343

    We, the American people, must dismantle this corrupt court if they find in Trumps favor.

    • @swimminginthoughts
      @swimminginthoughts 9 днів тому +10

      I like how fascist you sound!

    • @MegaKnuckles777
      @MegaKnuckles777 9 днів тому +28

      ​@@swimminginthoughtsNice projection you have there.

    • @davidrhinehart7764
      @davidrhinehart7764 9 днів тому +8

      So as long as they rule in your favor, it's cool. Right?

    • @jssomewhere6740
      @jssomewhere6740 9 днів тому

      They will not rule in his favor. They will just take forever to rule

    • @30.06onaGrassyKnoll
      @30.06onaGrassyKnoll 9 днів тому +7

      I'm calling dibs on Clarence "The Oreo" Thomas... I have a few good ideas for him.

  • @tamaramartin4015
    @tamaramartin4015 9 днів тому +10

    It's beyond insulting that they even dignified this ridiculousness in the first place.

  • @GeneTurner-gg4yo
    @GeneTurner-gg4yo 9 днів тому +7

    There are only a couple of supreme court justices that are trustworthy! But this bunch, OMG! there should be NO MORE lifetime appointments to the bench. There must be transparency and accountability for a deliberative body task with the application of law at the highest level. The fact that they are even hearing such NONSENSE speaks volumes!

  • @thomaskeiper4534
    @thomaskeiper4534 9 днів тому +642

    The US Supreme Court is a DISGRACE. How SHAMEFUL they are.

    • @smithyamiami
      @smithyamiami 9 днів тому +34

      I hope all the liberals that didn't vote for Hillary are happy.

    • @brandon3525
      @brandon3525 9 днів тому +1

      😢

    • @IAmSuzyQ
      @IAmSuzyQ 9 днів тому +48

      "A body of men holding themselves accountable to nobody, ought not be trusted by anybody."
      - Thomas Paine

    •  9 днів тому +15

      Im just Glad Trump is winning .

    • @malahammer
      @malahammer 9 днів тому +4

      hahahahahahaahah....ya mad dog :)

  • @creative-liberty
    @creative-liberty 9 днів тому +74

    The greatest generation of Americans are rolling over in their graves.

    • @nonya.bizness
      @nonya.bizness 9 днів тому +3

      the greatest generation of americans are our youngsters, who are very much alive.
      signed, genX.

    • @CallumMoscript
      @CallumMoscript 7 днів тому

      @@nonya.bizness show up with your numbers. less than 30% voted in the primaries

  • @mikekelley2877
    @mikekelley2877 9 днів тому +7

    Calling the members of the Supreme Court, human beings, is taking things a little too far; this case should NOT be heard and they know it.

  • @George.Q.Citizen
    @George.Q.Citizen 9 днів тому +8

    Should we ever allow any President to commit any crimes, ever? Why would that ever be Ok? The President is tasked with executing and upholding the rule of law. Giving that person the right to defy the law-any law-would be “breaking” the law in its most literal sense.

  • @seand1011
    @seand1011 9 днів тому +238

    The Supremely Disappointing Court continues to do just that - disappoint.

  • @christinedacy8826
    @christinedacy8826 9 днів тому +58

    Remove life tenure from the courts asap ..they are not above the law either...nor are they infallible..or incorruptible ...ask thomas

  • @Marr80
    @Marr80 9 днів тому +10

    I have no faith in this Supreme Court. I pray they do the right thing.

    • @AM-fs1je
      @AM-fs1je 9 днів тому

      They will not.

    • @CallumMoscript
      @CallumMoscript 7 днів тому

      prayers don't work. all we can do is vote vote vote and get involved in politically. every election up and down the ballot counts

  • @wesleywashington1251
    @wesleywashington1251 9 днів тому +11

    I used to consider myself lucky to live in America. Looks like our luck has run out. Now it's just a matter of time before the majority of us will be suffering under widespread poverty and oppression. The upfront corruption of the Supreme Court proves our country is doomed.

  • @sread833
    @sread833 9 днів тому +153

    Illegitimate court

  • @mona2046
    @mona2046 9 днів тому +152

    Term limits for SCOTUS!!!

    • @DuaneHallinSD
      @DuaneHallinSD 9 днів тому +5

      Most have overstayed their "visa".

    • @lynnrunningdeer7364
      @lynnrunningdeer7364 9 днів тому +4

      Just for starters but nowhere near limited to. A code of enforceable ethics, tax returns made available every year, criminal investigation both foreign and domestic and the largest gift possible limited to $5. Oh yeah no presidential appointees😡.

    • @mona2046
      @mona2046 9 днів тому +1

      @@lynnrunningdeer7364 Especially the last part!!!

    • @Toekneepowers
      @Toekneepowers 9 днів тому +3

      @@mona2046 What happened, something didn’t go the way you demanded it to?

    • @daisydy5741
      @daisydy5741 9 днів тому +4

      And impeachment for the corrupt ones starting with Mr T.

  • @daveallen4752
    @daveallen4752 9 днів тому +8

    SCOTUS need to register as a political party

  • @toritori5835
    @toritori5835 9 днів тому +5

    Jeez. This is so surreal. Never in the history of this nation has such a question (re: immunity for killing a political rival) been asked or even thought to be asked. Never would it have ever entered our minds. Never has it been a potential possibility.

  • @SalamaSond
    @SalamaSond 9 днів тому +89

    The new Supreme Church is complicit.

  • @eva-fran3876
    @eva-fran3876 9 днів тому +25

    Your Supreme Court, they should be ashamed !! I’m not even an US citizen !

  • @GaryWayneMyers
    @GaryWayneMyers 9 днів тому +7

    Criminal on the run in plain view.

  • @maureenoneill5754
    @maureenoneill5754 9 днів тому +4

    I hate that this is even being CONSIDERED! It's pure BS!!!

  • @billsmith2212
    @billsmith2212 9 днів тому +102

    After Lincoln was shot , 4 were hung in under 90 days ! It's going on 4 YEARS ! And this was broadcast LIVE ! I really don't get it !!!!!!!!!!!

    • @andrewstevenson118
      @andrewstevenson118 9 днів тому +14

      You know Trump has compared himself to Lincoln. There's a really bad taste joke in there...

    • @mariannaraho7576
      @mariannaraho7576 9 днів тому

      Me neither! Trump clearly committed treason which was a hanging offense to the founding fathers. He should have been put in jail that day!

    • @jryecart8017
      @jryecart8017 9 днів тому

      HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA thanks for the reminder .... DEMOCRATS have NEVER been AMERICANS - - - DEMOCRAT Anti-semitism
      See also: DEMOCFRAT Left-wing Anti-Semitism
      Rep. Rashida Tlaib supports the BDS movement. Tlaib made a bigoted tweet accusing Jewish-Americans of having divided loyalties, an attack frequently made by anti-Semites She wrote at least one op-ed on Louis Farrakhan's website. Tlaib did a selfie with a Hezbollah-praising activist to also denied Israel's right to exist. New York Magazine named her one of 10 activists who may become the future of the Democratic Party as the "new Obama." Tlaib was sworn in surrounded by a group that included Sarsour and Nihad Awad as her special guests.
      Rep. Ilhan Omar is known for her anti-Semitism, insensitivity and mocking remarks about Christians,[301] and homophobic comments directed against colleagues. Omar tweeted "Israel has hypnotized the world, may Allah awaken the people and help them see the evil doings of Israel." Omar supports BDS. Omar claims congressional support for Israel is "All about the Benjamins baby," a reference to the Ben Franklin $100 bill, implying members of Congress are paid off by AIPAC. Despite this, Democrats gave her a seat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee.
      The fourth-ranking Democrat in the House, Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, defended Tlaib and Omar as "thoughtful colleagues." Tlaib is a member of a Facebook group that posts anti-Semitic videos and memes. The Daily Caller reported that a key fundraiser for Tlaib posted a Holocaust denial video.

    • @ericlipps9459
      @ericlipps9459 9 днів тому +9

      @@andrewstevenson118 More than one. How about this: It's too bad Trump wasn't born in 1809 like Lincoln.

    • @jryecart8017
      @jryecart8017 9 днів тому

      @@andrewstevenson118 The DEMOCRAT KKK grew into a secret society terrorizing Black communities and seeping through white DEMOCRAT culture, with members at the highest levels of government and in the lowest echelons of criminal back alleys.

  • @IAmSuzyQ
    @IAmSuzyQ 9 днів тому +181

    "There will come a day when Donald Trump is gone, but your dishonor will remain." -Liz Cheney to Republicans who continue to support and defend him.

    • @truthcounts94
      @truthcounts94 9 днів тому

      The Supreme Court is tainted we must work on Democrats holding all three branches, WHITEHOUSE SENATE CONGRESS so we can increase the court to 12. THOMAS is in bad health and obese. ALITO is vile to his core.

    • @walkingstick6655
      @walkingstick6655 9 днів тому

      It can't be said enough. When will this insane bubble burst? Of course, Trump may become irrelevant, but those that followed him will remain and they will remain obtuse, uneducated, uninformed, delusional cranks.

    • @marchowardsinisterexaggerator
      @marchowardsinisterexaggerator 9 днів тому

      liz cheney is a traitor coward so your quote is garbage

    • @deefitzgerald2906
      @deefitzgerald2906 9 днів тому

      There will be a Day and the DEMOCRATIC Party will have DESTROYED Trumps Life all because they HATE HIM ….We teach Our
      Children Better and these Religious SO Call Christians how can they Look into a Mirror 🪞 if he wasn’t running in this Next election
      U would NEVER hear 1 word…..Disgusting

    • @666isdaNewblueVoter
      @666isdaNewblueVoter 8 днів тому

      Liz Cheney is as Crazy 🤪 😜 🤡 as a Clown
      & A Looney 🐦 Bird

  • @frankteunissen6118
    @frankteunissen6118 9 днів тому +5

    For the Supreme Court, especially THIS Supreme Court, Lord Acton’s dictum applies: “Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely”. There is no check on the power of these people.

  • @checksandbalances6714
    @checksandbalances6714 9 днів тому +6

    Clarence Thomas : “What ? Hold the president accountable !? What’s next !! Hold the Supreme Court justices accountable too !? Outrageous ! “

  • @Alex-gc2vo
    @Alex-gc2vo 9 днів тому +59

    Such a waste of time. We all know their answer. They'll say it's up to congress

  • @mstunameow
    @mstunameow 9 днів тому +30

    Makes me sick that they are hearing this at all. We already heard it fully examined and demolished by the DC Appeals court, they have absolutely nothing they can possibly add but politics and obtuse questions. WTAF do they think they're doing. The arrogance is disgusting.

    • @nakedreef
      @nakedreef 9 днів тому

      They will be known as MFs all through history now. A Dark Stain in the government.

  • @hogwelder505
    @hogwelder505 9 днів тому +4

    I thank it’s time to revisit the way that the supreme court judges are set above the law that they are suppose to be enforcing and how the people they are representing can remove them from office if they don’t comply with the law.

  • @josephmatuszak3855
    @josephmatuszak3855 9 днів тому +6

    There is too many things about taking this case.... now.... is beyond me. This Supreme Court gonna go down as just as much the clown car are the GOP/RNC

  • @vaeloreonari7516
    @vaeloreonari7516 9 днів тому +31

    SCROTUS has already disgraced itself by neutering the 14th Amendment and overturning Roe, and they should have never even taken up this case, which makes me very sceptical that they will do the right thing.

    • @dmann1115
      @dmann1115 9 днів тому +4

      Absolutely!!! And I'm flummoxed by the lack of any protest among the legal profession, beyond punditry. They aren't grasping the serious danger happening by the hour, and the window of opportunity for effective action is already closing!

    • @nakedreef
      @nakedreef 9 днів тому +1

      You picked the right word to describe them.

  • @emiliachidester3250
    @emiliachidester3250 9 днів тому +143

    THIS SUPREME COURT SHOULD BE DISMANTLED.

    • @larynOneka8080
      @larynOneka8080 9 днів тому +3

      That's a bit extreme.

    • @carlrossum
      @carlrossum 9 днів тому +5

      Agreed There has to be a balanced bench, not a bag of right winger nut bags.

    • @sheilaboston7051
      @sheilaboston7051 9 днів тому +5

      This SC should be added to - 13 judges, one for each district. Maybe a project for Biden's second term?

    • @user-je3ul4cs8x
      @user-je3ul4cs8x 9 днів тому +3

      Remove every one of them and have reappointed judges. Must be split evenly with 1 non partisan judge to stop stalemate decisions!

    • @shlby69m
      @shlby69m 9 днів тому

      It will, essentially, be if Trump wins Prez.

  • @curiosity540
    @curiosity540 9 днів тому +6

    I like Joyce Vance’s twist on this: If the President orders an assignation on a supreme court Justice he disagrees with, rather than a political rival…rather moving, but this court is trying to become the legislative branch at the bequest of their wealthy donors.

    • @71suns
      @71suns 9 днів тому

      BINGO

    • @awtodor
      @awtodor 7 днів тому +1

      100% it's obvious

  • @paulneufelder9305
    @paulneufelder9305 9 днів тому +7

    Where is the AG arresting judges that have gotten away with tax evasion for years.

  • @lbierman
    @lbierman 9 днів тому +39

    Again: "The best justice money can buy."

  • @Bella_Kilcher
    @Bella_Kilcher 9 днів тому +204

    The Supreme Court Justices SHOULD HAVE FOUR (4) YEAR TERMS

    • @user-ei8do4uq4j
      @user-ei8do4uq4j 9 днів тому +7

      Politicians shouldn't be able to trade stocks that their policies on the house floor influence. Nobody is above the law??? Lol

    • @CatCaretakerID
      @CatCaretakerID 9 днів тому +3

      A four-year term wouldn't have stopped the damage this group of horrible people have already done.

    • @peterstaniforth451
      @peterstaniforth451 9 днів тому +3

      4 year prison terms for some of them,

    • @nakedreef
      @nakedreef 9 днів тому +2

      @@peterstaniforth451 NOW you're talking. That's right.

  • @joefitzmaurice4616
    @joefitzmaurice4616 9 днів тому +6

    I live in Ireland. I can't understand why those who care about and love democracy don't gather outside the supreme court when this decision is being made. We depend on America. If America lets dark actors steal their democracy away, it is not just sad for Americans but the rest of the freedom world also!

  • @ShakeMyWay
    @ShakeMyWay 9 днів тому +4

    So sad to watch our country go down the crapper. What happened to being able to put your own politics aside?

  • @rayvezeau
    @rayvezeau 9 днів тому +107

    I live in Canada the people are going to rise up against the Supreme Court. This is getting out of hand. All it’s been Trump Trump Trump.

    • @adamdavis2035
      @adamdavis2035 9 днів тому +3

      Insurrection!

    • @scabcrawler632
      @scabcrawler632 9 днів тому

      Worry about justin castro ma'am

    • @oldpossum57
      @oldpossum57 9 днів тому +1

      @@scabcrawler632 I think you will find a greater % of Canadians follow USA politics than Americans do Canadian politics . After all, the state of your democracy has a massive effect on ours.
      Rayvezeau could well be a supporter of the Conservative Party of Canada, not of Mr. Trudeau’s governing Liberals: you do not know. No matter. As a nation we are vitally concerned, ever if we have no say
      For example was odd, but I found myself explaining to an highly educated American (PhD, university prof) how Maine and Nebraska award Electoral College votes differently than other states. There is no way I should know stuff like that, or the names of SCOTUS cases like Heller, MacDonald, United Citizens. These are not household names like Roe v Wade, or Brown v School Board or Dred Scott.

    • @godspeed2939
      @godspeed2939 9 днів тому

      Thank you organize we need 500,000 or more

    • @oldpossum57
      @oldpossum57 9 днів тому

      @@scabcrawler632 BTW, Mr Justin Trudeau won three elections (1 majority, and 2 minority governments). A lacklustre leader without a lot of skill, he will nonetheless have served nearly 9 years when the next election is called, making him the 7th longest-serving PM. Not a great legacy, but mildly competent, with an unusual talent for kicking own-goals.

  • @IAmSuzyQ
    @IAmSuzyQ 9 днів тому +37

    "He would see this country burn if he could be king of the ashes."
    That's a quote referring to the GOT's character, Littlefinger, but it also fits for the GOP's cult leader, Tinyhands. Trump will do anything to regain power, and it's our job to make sure he fails!
    🌊🌊🌊 VOTE BLUE 🌊🌊🌊

    • @cbrashsorensen
      @cbrashsorensen 9 днів тому +4

      Littlefinger taken down by a "mere woman".

  • @elizknight8262
    @elizknight8262 9 днів тому +3

    I have some hope for our country when I listen to Nichole and Andrew Weissmann, but then the show is over and I'm plunged into doubt and despair again.

  • @algreentube
    @algreentube 9 днів тому +5

    This is one of the Most Important court cases in American History

  • @ironfisto250
    @ironfisto250 9 днів тому +46

    Remember when Trump told us repeatedly how Hope Hicks has an amazing photographic memory?!! I'm looking forward to her testimony under oath!!

  • @Leon_Russell.
    @Leon_Russell. 9 днів тому +49

    Wouldn't the Supreme Court finding anyone to be above the law negate they themselves as 'supreme' arbiters of the law? Or is that too obvious?

    • @ttomgast1769
      @ttomgast1769 9 днів тому +4

      As long as the power favors their political preference I don't think they would even care . That's what the John Roberts Supreme Court is .

    • @cbrashsorensen
      @cbrashsorensen 9 днів тому

      Actually the "Supremes" ARE above the law. Thomas has obviously done some unethical things but there are ZERO consequences. So yes, the "Supremes" have the greatest power over the populace--way more consequences to our daily lives than the President.

    • @nonya.bizness
      @nonya.bizness 9 днів тому

      right. they have no intention of buying in to tfg's supreme leader bs. they only took the case to block his criminal trials.
      i bet tfg is furiously bombarding 'his' scotus picks and roberts so hard they have legal grounds for a restraining order against him.

  • @cedsimpson1429
    @cedsimpson1429 9 днів тому +6

    From New Zealand: It's very hard to see the USA dismantling democracy, institution by institution.

  • @willvm394
    @willvm394 9 днів тому +4

    The trial judge ruled months ago, that a president was not immune from justice for his criminal actions!
    The court of appeals ruled twice, that a president was not immune from justice for his criminal actions!
    The Special Counsel, in an attempt to avoid unnecessary delays asked the Supreme Court, at the time when the court of appeals was considering this matter a second time, to consider the facts, but they declined!
    The Supreme Court then delayed accepting the matter, and also hearing arguments!
    Considering the financial considerations AT LEAST four members of the Supreme Court have, in my opinion, received because of their status, (and I have posted those considerations previously), the aim of The Court seems to be to assist the defendant as much as they are able!

  • @kathyfoley2364
    @kathyfoley2364 9 днів тому +18

    Impeach them, no stalling

  • @keithcrimmel1902
    @keithcrimmel1902 9 днів тому +3

    What would it take to demand a vote of no confidence in the supreme court?????

  • @Mirrorgirl492
    @Mirrorgirl492 9 днів тому +4

    The fact that other members of the Stupid Court are okay with being in the same room with Thomas, tells you everything you need to know. Polluted.

  • @joeelliott2157
    @joeelliott2157 9 днів тому +16

    The problem with the Supreme Court can only be fixed by electing Democrats to the Presidency and the Senate for the next several years, maybe over the period of a decade, until the 6-3 majority becomes at least a 4-5 minority. They leave us no option but to do this.

  • @glenn71144
    @glenn71144 9 днів тому +18

    Thank you, Liz. Thank you, Andrew.

  • @paulasmith3590
    @paulasmith3590 9 днів тому +5

    I am with you Nicole. It is unbelievable that this issue has to even be decided. It should be a given that no one, including a past and current president, is above the law. We are doomed if the supreme decides for trump.

    • @AM-fs1je
      @AM-fs1je 9 днів тому

      Billionaire-owned Extreme Court

  • @OohGreat
    @OohGreat 9 днів тому +3

    *Something needs to be done with the Supreme Court, What a disgrace to US* 🤦🏻‍♂️

  • @user-kn7hm5kd2q
    @user-kn7hm5kd2q 9 днів тому +28

    The court can delay all they want but they can't stop the people from voting this traitor into the prison where he belongs!

  • @purem9150
    @purem9150 9 днів тому +28

    Does that mean he could direct Seal Team 6 to assassinate the Supreme Court with immunity?

    • @JGold-cu5mo
      @JGold-cu5mo 9 днів тому +4

      Yes... or trump.

    • @samlira9639
      @samlira9639 9 днів тому

      And members of congress too so there can’t be enough votes to impeach and therefore the current president can’t be prosecuted criminally…ever! That’s based on trumps absolute immunity argument. Why is the Supreme Court entertaining this argument! This Supreme Court is so corrupt.

    • @w.callens1629
      @w.callens1629 9 днів тому

      Seems like a legitimate question the Supreme Court will take a year or 2 to answer...

    • @aprikosenboy1995
      @aprikosenboy1995 9 днів тому

      Yes he could. But than he would likely be impeached,convinced,and than put in front of a court of law. Because that's how it is intended to work.

    • @kshred3043
      @kshred3043 9 днів тому +1

      @@aprikosenboy1995 'Because that's how it is intended to work.'
      Really ? Apparently you are unaware that Mitch McConnell said it was up to the courts to decide in Trump's second impeachment trial, meanwhile voting not to convict.

  • @jBKht931
    @jBKht931 9 днів тому +2

    Hope is the gateway to dispair. Dang Nichole, you summed up the entire Trump era. 😢

  • @68charger88
    @68charger88 9 днів тому +2

    Term Limits for Supreme Court Justices!

  • @crisbajcrisbaj468
    @crisbajcrisbaj468 9 днів тому +12

    ... time for TERM LIMITS on Supreme Court Justices...

  • @roccodevillers8860
    @roccodevillers8860 9 днів тому +19

    An example of Justice denied is Justice delayed!

    • @james6901
      @james6901 9 днів тому

      grow up American justice is non existent,,,,,you had a coup jan 6th.......he is standing again,,,,,,justice?? americans really need educated...greetings from SCOTLAND

    • @tinakwan6485
      @tinakwan6485 9 днів тому +1

      “Martin Luther King Jr., used the phrase in the form "justice too long delayed is justice denied" in his "Letter from Birmingham Jail", smuggled out of prison in 1963”

  • @quotient-3petroleum958
    @quotient-3petroleum958 9 днів тому +2

    As an outsider I am looking at the US democracy from abroad and shaking my head.

  • @kayfitzgerald309
    @kayfitzgerald309 9 днів тому +5

    Supreme Crook Court!😡

  • @kathyweis7451
    @kathyweis7451 9 днів тому +22

    There needs to be term limits, there needs to be real ethic rules not just the toothless ones they crafted themselves. There needs to be an impeachment act on any judge that is corrupt. Vote blue down ballot so we can achieve those goals..

    • @james6901
      @james6901 9 днів тому

      YOU NEED AN INDENDENT JUSTICE SYSTEM,,,,,,,america grow up.

    • @nakedreef
      @nakedreef 9 днів тому

      Ditto!!

  • @ehayes7849
    @ehayes7849 9 днів тому +7

    Thank you, Liz. I hope your efforts and the millions of us citizens see the serial criminal behind bars.

  • @smitty5890
    @smitty5890 9 днів тому +3

    It is by any measure disturbing that this is the highest court in the land and they have been bought and paid for by a trader to the country. Their is no words to justify what they have already done to the country. The life time appointment has to change !

  • @joeb4142
    @joeb4142 9 днів тому +5

    We need 4 more Supreme Court justices.

    • @awtodor
      @awtodor 7 днів тому

      Honestly stacking won't matter long term. Too much $$$, conservatives will always have more

  • @ARRR-SAUROPHAGANAX
    @ARRR-SAUROPHAGANAX 9 днів тому +40

    Why allegations of bribery are not yet investigated?

    • @james6901
      @james6901 9 днів тому

      BECAUSE its america,,,,,,when will people realise justice in America is non existent.....you have the biggest jail population than the rest of the world combined (check) very few wealthy are jailed.....jeez nixon was pardoned,,,justice in america? your joking.

    • @dmann1115
      @dmann1115 9 днів тому

      Have you seen Congress this year?

    • @nakedreef
      @nakedreef 9 днів тому

      I'd like to know what's going on with that myself.

  • @davidhirschy8761
    @davidhirschy8761 9 днів тому +17

    So the real question is does the Supreme Court justices have total immunity? Not does the president have total immunity. Just comparing terms of office!

    • @AM-fs1je
      @AM-fs1je 9 днів тому

      Billionaire-owned Extreme Court has never had accountability, but until now, the president did.

  • @jonathanwade5744
    @jonathanwade5744 9 днів тому +3

    Justice delayed is justice denied. Somebody might want to remind SC Justices about this simple principle of justice.

    • @AM-fs1je
      @AM-fs1je 9 днів тому

      They dont care. Billionaire-owned Extreme Court

  • @thomaskeiper4534
    @thomaskeiper4534 9 днів тому +79

    The Supreme Court Justices SHOULD HAVE FOUR (4) YEAR TERMS.

    • @annconforti9294
      @annconforti9294 9 днів тому

      President, too.

    • @andrewstevenson118
      @andrewstevenson118 9 днів тому +4

      And don't have them elected via political means. I can't think of another country that prefaces their judges with "an Obama-appointed" or "a Bush-appointed" or similar. I think it's unique. And not in a good way.

    • @thomasmurphy1562
      @thomasmurphy1562 9 днів тому +2

      That's one of the dumbest things I've ever heard

    • @lynnrunningdeer7364
      @lynnrunningdeer7364 9 днів тому +1

      No two, just like the president.

    • @lynnrunningdeer7364
      @lynnrunningdeer7364 9 днів тому +2

      ​@@thomasmurphy1562it's not even complicated🤣. That says more about you than them😂.

  • @Ryan-Fkrepublicnz
    @Ryan-Fkrepublicnz 9 днів тому +9

    SICK. DEMENTED. WRONG.

  • @nancydouglas8772
    @nancydouglas8772 9 днів тому +6

    I totally agree with Liz Chaney, the American people have a right to know if Trump committed crimes and be completed before the election. The scotus should not hold up these trials.

    • @AM-fs1je
      @AM-fs1je 9 днів тому

      The billionaire-owned Extreme Court is holding things up because they're going to rule in his favor.

  • @lisakeane4386
    @lisakeane4386 9 днів тому +2

    “Hope is the gateway to despair. “ love it. 😂

  • @elaineisabelle427
    @elaineisabelle427 9 днів тому +22

    Liz is so right, I just hope SCOTUS does the right thing but I don't have high hopes from the high court.

    • @BROU-bb2uc
      @BROU-bb2uc 9 днів тому

      Is that why she lost by a MILE😂

  • @johntillotson4254
    @johntillotson4254 9 днів тому +37

    I agree with what President Carter said. If looked at in detail we would see trump did not win. I feel hes right.

    • @james6901
      @james6901 9 днів тому

      really? thats your conclusion? your a genius.

    • @Anthony-hu3rj
      @Anthony-hu3rj 9 днів тому +5

      @@james69011) Capitalize the first word of every sentence. 2) Put an apostrophe in "that's." "3) It's "You're" not "Your." Okay, your educational level has been established, what else can you show us?

    • @BROU-bb2uc
      @BROU-bb2uc 9 днів тому

      Oh but broken pipes bursting happen all the time and 3am ballot drops 🙄

    • @kayfitzgerald309
      @kayfitzgerald309 9 днів тому

      ​@@Anthony-hu3rjthat he's a magat!??!😅