@@carystevensky 😳🤦♂️🤣….yaw damper on…🙃. Nearly all commercial airplanes use a yaw damper. ‘A yaw damper is a system that helps keep an aircraft stable during flight by automatically adjusting the rudder in response to detected yaw’ 🤷🏾♂️🤷🏾♂️
Not used by the pilots themselves for anything else that he didn’t include really. The yaw damper automatically moves it during flight on most airliners including the 737s.
Back in the day, Boeing didn’t have these issues as almost everything was done inhouse. Now, the only thing Boeing does is to assemble the parts that many vendors supply to complete the airplane. What can possibly go wrong.
Can we get an actual expert or pilot to explain a rudder? "sometimes" more like all the time in every turn, I wish news companies did a better job for the viewing party.
I’m a licensed private pilot for airplanes single engine land. The rudder is a panel on the back of the vertical stabilizer at the tail of the airplane. The rudder is used all the time, in every turn to keep the nose of the airplane coordinated with the turn. In smaller airplanes, like the Cessna 172s, which I fly, the rudder is used during takeoff as well, because of left turning tendencies that apply to the aircraft.
Sloppy reporting. Why does the PRESS HAVE SO MUCH TROUBLE REPORTING ON TECHNICAL SUBJECTS? Probably the same reason airplane assemblers put is a bearing with a seal side in backwards. High school physics is a subject to be avoided if possible
Airbus has their issues. Boeings are flown all over the world every single day without incident. I mean, if you want to cede aircraft manufacturing to the Europeans, go ahead. Unfortunately, Boeing has eaten up all of American commercial aerospace companies that it used to compete with. To lose Boeing would be a devastating loss to US high tech manufacturing. But then, I’m sure China will pick up the slack, if you’d feel better flying on red Chinese airplanes
I hate to break it to you, but Collins also builds rollout actuators for magic Airbus products. But hey, feel free to get your aeronautical information from the minivan media.
@jtwilliams8895 , You honestly think that boeing cares about quality control or even passenger safety? Investors need their bag of loot, and nothing else matters.
@AbdullahNajib-b9z , yet they crash more than all other aero manufacturers. The new boeing leadership doesn't care about quality control or even passenger safety. The investors need their loot, and boeing will provide
@@AbdullahNajib-b9zdoes the mysterious deaths of Boeing whistleblowers are also indicates that most of the recent crash or incident are cause by maintenance and pilot errors?
Last week my wife had an emergency landing in a 737 Max due to a cabin pressurization malfunction… I’m avoiding this plane at all costs at this point. Not worth the stress.
If this was really as severe of an issue as you guys are making it out to be, there would already be an emergency airworthiness directive out. And not only isn’t the an emergency airworthiness directive out, there isn’t even a regular airworthiness directive. Quit the hysteria.
FA and FAA employees are against America, and against American people. They don’t care about safety, they don’t care about fun. They care about control. Anything that’s put out by the FAA is bull. Anything. they don’t know, Boeing does.
The term “airworthiness quote is a ridiculous and pompous term. That’s FAA workers for you. That’s lawmakers for you. that’s government for you. Boeing knows, government does not, and they never will. Government is evil.
@jasonrichards5854 You can add another number. How many 737 are in operation, and which air carriers operate the what number of aircraft with this defective part.
The NTSB said in its statement Thursday: NTSB investigators tested one of the rudder control components from the incident airplane, a rollout guidance actuator, at the component’s manufacturer, Collins Aerospace. When the incident actuator and an identical unit from another airplane were tested in a cold environment, the actuators’ function was significantly compromised. Investigators found evidence of moisture in both actuators, which failed testing. Collins Aerospace subsequently determined that a sealed bearing was incorrectly assembled during production of the actuators, leaving the unsealed side more susceptible to moisture that can freeze and limit rudder system movement. The Federal Aviation Administration said United Airlines is the only U.S. operator that had the components, and "it is the FAA's understanding that the units are no longer in service."
All the planes manufactured with this part are planes being used by carriers outside of the US. The one particular United jet was owned by a foreign airline prior to coming to UAL. This isn't really Boeing's fault, this is Collins's fault for building a faulty part. With that said, pilots in these types of planes with yaw dampers especially are not always throwing in rudder inputs. This can cause other issues if excessive rudder inputs are done. A yaw damper is used to keep the plane coordinated through turns and other things yet there are limitations like crosswinds and engine failures. In transport category aircraft most pilot's feet will go to the floor once at a comfortable altitude, but no rudder input is actually done through turns. So is the rudder used during flight a lot? Yes by the yaw damper, but the pilot isn't constantly throwing in rudder inputs is most likely what this guy is referring to.
It’s like a nightmare we are living where money overtakes safety. Seriously sick world we live in. A once respected and trusted company now looked at like a joke.
@@philip6579 true but I mean it’s true it’s got more passengers to their destinations safely than the amount of people that have died or the amount of emergencies they’ve had
737s and some 727s have had a number of rudder control issues over the years. I know I was a heavy check mechanic for a major airline. Usually the rudder power control unit. There were more than a few incidents. Some fatal. UA in Colorado Springs for example. The rudder is locked out in some phases of flight with yaw control being performed by spoilers on the wing.
Former Boeing Everett... Another hatchet job from the alarmist media... the part was from an outside vendor... problem is on vendor... not Boeing... and they are working with the vendor about the issue and has notified carriers with 737's... let's focus on real issues like wheels falling off older planes maintained poorly by United... oops... not Boeing again... OK let's hammer Boeing over 'missing' door plugs... or windows on same planes... oops... entire fuselage made by outside vendor again... the list is endless...
@@Claus-y5y I can see by your UA-cam Profile you are an expert in nothing... please cite Case Law that supports your brilliant Legal Brief about Vendor Responsibility...
It's crazy that the manual would say to use force if necessary to unjam a stuck rudder. I think that's a bad idea and unnecessary, unless the rudder is jammed/stuck in an extreme left or right position and you don't have any other choice.
What's interesting here is 737 had rudder issues in the '90s (resulting in many fatalities). How did a rudder design not last for thirty years without issues?
This has happened before. Same symptoms too. There were multiple crashes on “Jurassic” 737 models due to the yaw damper. This isn’t a MAX=BAD thing, this is a general 737 design fault that’s been with us since the ‘60s.
So let’s get this straight. Boeing assembly line workers are doing shoddy horrible job, while simultaneously having the nerve to demand higher wages. Wow. Simply wow.
What about all those "reassurances" that the company's bad days are already in the past, and their products have been deemed safe to fly by multiple agencies?!
What an astonishingly poor job explaining the issue. This wasn't a Boeing issue, it was a Collins issue. I hate to break it to you boys and girls, but Collins also builds rollout actuators for magic Airbus products. In the same way that LEAP1's power 737MAXs and also power some A320NEO's. This clickbait video makes it sound like the issue was with the rudder itself. It was not. It was with the rollout actuator. You only use rollout actuators during an autoland. Many airlines don't even do autolands in their 737s.
The problem is that the Board of Directors and Management of Boeing needs to change dramatically and the folks on strike need to take an IQ test before they go back to their Assembly jobs or learn Spanish ! Air Bus makes the same planes .
The problem is that for last 10 years, boeing had hired a lot of barely speaking/ reading English people as mechanics and inspectors working in the assembly lines under incompetent management.
Breaking News! FAA approves a Boeing Designed and Approved Update to their super safe 737 No Good and Max fleet. While it may look like and work like a fashionable turtle neck sweater covering the tail, the material is actually more stretchy.
The 737 Classic issues are back to roost, to nobody’s surprise Well? I’m sure there are some people who are surprised it took this long. And there’s a MAX 10 too
I flew on one of them over summer and man, let me tell you, I was sweating all the way from Houston to Des Moines in that thing. Dang junky faulty Boeing stuff 😩 I’d rather drive my car than fly Boeing again!
Boeing Roulette... It is well known that if you had not paid extra, you have no right to expect to fly safely. Boeing does what it cares about most, K¡lls.
As long as the FAA and the government is not involved, it’s good. No plane should ever be “grounded “by government. That’s absolutely ridiculous and prideful for them to do that.
@@AbdullahNajib-b9z I don’t care who supplied it, or what the design was, government is at fault. Government workers are at fault. They are the evil sinister people who are behind this who plot to destroy Boeing., shame on lawmakers, shame on Biden. Shame on government. They destroy companies in peoples lives, and they revel in doing so.
Hopefully and finish ending business in the USA and lead to the first fourth world country in the world with more debt than total value especially when there is no business of value. Welfare is worthless in world value but buying millions of votes.
Wow more problems and their Union is wanting more pay . Seems like they have a lot of quality problems . Makes you not want to fly anywhere especially on a Boeing plane . Their logo should be dly at your own risk.
@@AbdullahNajib-b9z Oh really? That why Boeing paid fines, was forced to limit production, got chewed out by the NTSB, fined by the FAA, subpoenaed for congressional hearings, had BOD members resign, not to mention the deaths of two whistleblowers. Boeing is a skeleton of its former self. Right now they’re behind schedule with Air Force One, the tanker aircraft for the Air Force, Starliner, not to mention all the airline orders it’s behind on.
That wasn't even a 737 nor was it the rudder that caused that issue......Nor was it even a manufacture flaw. The airline was 100 percent to blame for that crash.
@@NovejSpeed3 The rudder is in the Vertical Stabilizer. We as outsiders do not know how the internal components interact with each other. So in that case… the Swiss Cheese Model plays into effect from the start of the announcement for the Rudder issues on the 737s. Everything is connected. Aviation Safety is the overall picture.
That 'pilot' FAILED at describing the rudder. It IS a critical component for flight control and is used all the time.....................
Absolutely.
From the POV of a pilot, that was a horrible way to describe a rudder. Rudders are used all the time, in every single turn.
Not on commercial jets
@@carystevensky then how does the commercial jet stay in coordinated flight during the turn? Are you referring to it being automated?
@@carystevenskyI don’t have my ATP or anything so I might be wrong but.. the planes autopilot uses the rudder. I think it’s called a yaw damper
@@carystevensky 😳🤦♂️🤣….yaw damper on…🙃. Nearly all commercial airplanes use a yaw damper. ‘A yaw damper is a system that helps keep an aircraft stable during flight by automatically adjusting the rudder in response to detected yaw’ 🤷🏾♂️🤷🏾♂️
He used "all the time" as a technicality to lie to the public.
Where do they get these “experts” from. The rudder is literally used all the time. Guys clearly not a pilot
Not used by the pilots themselves for anything else that he didn’t include really. The yaw damper automatically moves it during flight on most airliners including the 737s.
He was exactly right.
@@bobby1970 When and where did he say that? Link?
This guy is lying! You use the rudder all the time!
Why are they downplaying the role of a rudder?
He works for Boeing.
That dude explaining an airplane rudder has never flown with a CFI yelling more right rudder😂
Brother, this is so accurate, talk about STRESS😂😂
Worst rudder explanation ever
Back in the day, Boeing didn’t have these issues as almost everything was done inhouse. Now, the only thing Boeing does is to assemble the parts that many vendors supply to complete the airplane. What can possibly go wrong.
What a time to be alive.
Have you heard of the issues with the 737-200 rudder? 2 crashes and many incidents because of a faulty rudder…
Can we get an actual expert or pilot to explain a rudder? "sometimes" more like all the time in every turn, I wish news companies did a better job for the viewing party.
I’ve never flown a plane but even I know better! 🤦🏻♂️
I’m a licensed private pilot for airplanes single engine land. The rudder is a panel on the back of the vertical stabilizer at the tail of the airplane. The rudder is used all the time, in every turn to keep the nose of the airplane coordinated with the turn. In smaller airplanes, like the Cessna 172s, which I fly, the rudder is used during takeoff as well, because of left turning tendencies that apply to the aircraft.
A steering wheel…it’s used sometimes not all the time…🤣😂😆🙄
Sloppy reporting. Why does the PRESS HAVE SO MUCH TROUBLE REPORTING ON TECHNICAL SUBJECTS? Probably the same reason airplane assemblers put is a bearing with a seal side in backwards. High school physics is a subject to be avoided if possible
Simple: fly on Airbus 😂
Airbus, Embraer, or Bombardier not Boeing.
Airbus has their issues. Boeings are flown all over the world every single day without incident. I mean, if you want to cede aircraft manufacturing to the Europeans, go ahead. Unfortunately, Boeing has eaten up all of American commercial aerospace companies that it used to compete with. To lose Boeing would be a devastating loss to US high tech manufacturing. But then, I’m sure China will pick up the slack, if you’d feel better flying on red Chinese airplanes
I hate to break it to you, but Collins also builds rollout actuators for magic Airbus products. But hey, feel free to get your aeronautical information from the minivan media.
@jtwilliams8895 , You honestly think that boeing cares about quality control or even passenger safety? Investors need their bag of loot, and nothing else matters.
As old saying goes, if it is Boeing, I'm not going..
even though boeing crashes less than cars?
@AbdullahNajib-b9z , yet they crash more than all other aero manufacturers. The new boeing leadership doesn't care about quality control or even passenger safety. The investors need their loot, and boeing will provide
@@gOD_SmackEDok eggshell fan
@@gOD_SmackED and how is that fair?pilot error also causes crashes as wel as maintenance
@@AbdullahNajib-b9zdoes the mysterious deaths of Boeing whistleblowers are also indicates that most of the recent crash or incident are cause by maintenance and pilot errors?
Last week my wife had an emergency landing in a 737 Max due to a cabin pressurization malfunction… I’m avoiding this plane at all costs at this point. Not worth the stress.
I have been…and I am in the “biz”.
BOEING HAS LESS INCIDENTS THAN CARS,THAT WAS A COINCIDENCE
If this was really as severe of an issue as you guys are making it out to be, there would already be an emergency airworthiness directive out. And not only isn’t the an emergency airworthiness directive out, there isn’t even a regular airworthiness directive. Quit the hysteria.
Spot on... alarmist media selling headlines again...
Thank you. The media here is why America is no longer the "Home of the Brave" But the home of the scared and cowardly!"
FA and FAA employees are against America, and against American people. They don’t care about safety, they don’t care about fun. They care about control. Anything that’s put out by the FAA is bull. Anything. they don’t know, Boeing does.
The term “airworthiness quote is a ridiculous and pompous term. That’s FAA workers for you. That’s lawmakers for you. that’s government for you. Boeing knows, government does not, and they never will. Government is evil.
@jasonrichards5854 You can add another number. How many 737 are in operation, and which air carriers operate the what number of aircraft with this defective part.
The NTSB said in its statement Thursday:
NTSB investigators tested one of the rudder control components from the incident airplane, a rollout guidance actuator, at the component’s manufacturer, Collins Aerospace. When the incident actuator and an identical unit from another airplane were tested in a cold environment, the actuators’ function was significantly compromised. Investigators found evidence of moisture in both actuators, which failed testing. Collins Aerospace subsequently determined that a sealed bearing was incorrectly assembled during production of the actuators, leaving the unsealed side more susceptible to moisture that can freeze and limit rudder system movement.
The Federal Aviation Administration said United Airlines is the only U.S. operator that had the components, and "it is the FAA's understanding that the units are no longer in service."
All the planes manufactured with this part are planes being used by carriers outside of the US. The one particular United jet was owned by a foreign airline prior to coming to UAL. This isn't really Boeing's fault, this is Collins's fault for building a faulty part. With that said, pilots in these types of planes with yaw dampers especially are not always throwing in rudder inputs. This can cause other issues if excessive rudder inputs are done. A yaw damper is used to keep the plane coordinated through turns and other things yet there are limitations like crosswinds and engine failures. In transport category aircraft most pilot's feet will go to the floor once at a comfortable altitude, but no rudder input is actually done through turns. So is the rudder used during flight a lot? Yes by the yaw damper, but the pilot isn't constantly throwing in rudder inputs is most likely what this guy is referring to.
It’s like a nightmare we are living where money overtakes safety. Seriously sick world we live in. A once respected and trusted company now looked at like a joke.
usair 427 flashbacks
This was nothing like that. USAir was a rudder PCU, this was a rollout actuator. Many 737MAXs/NGs don't even have rollout actuators installed.
Ummmm... The rudder is used all the time
The cable was from Rockwell company. Whatever went wrong is on Rockwell company. Machines just installed them on the plane. They don’t know.
Humans should be installing something that critical.
I just flew on a 737 max and it was perfectly safe
Just because you survived? I mean, people survive smoking while base jumping.
@@philip6579 true but I mean it’s true it’s got more passengers to their destinations safely than the amount of people that have died or the amount of emergencies they’ve had
@@philip6579 I’ve also flown on multiple max aircraft plenty of times none of which anything happened
@@SkyWatchAviation clever person.very rare to find people who actually know aboout avi these days!
@@AbdullahNajib-b9z well my dream is to be a pilot someday that’s been my dream my entire life
737s and some 727s have had a number of rudder control issues over the years. I know I was a heavy check mechanic for a major airline. Usually the rudder power control unit. There were more than a few incidents. Some fatal. UA in Colorado Springs for example. The rudder is locked out in some phases of flight with yaw control being performed by spoilers on the wing.
This was an issue years ago that caused quite a few crashes when they froze in one direction or the other
So, the supplier notified Boeing, Boeing notified airlines, in the US it was only United, and they have already fixed it. Why is this a story?
Didn't Boeing have issues with the rudder back in the day? UsAir crash with jammed rudder?
Former Boeing Everett... Another hatchet job from the alarmist media... the part was from an outside vendor... problem is on vendor... not Boeing... and they are working with the vendor about the issue and has notified carriers with 737's... let's focus on real issues like wheels falling off older planes maintained poorly by United... oops... not Boeing again... OK let's hammer Boeing over 'missing' door plugs... or windows on same planes... oops... entire fuselage made by outside vendor again... the list is endless...
It doesn’t matter what vendor delivers what. Boing is selling the plane, thus is responsible for the quality and safety of its products.
@@Claus-y5y I can see by your UA-cam Profile you are an expert in nothing... please cite Case Law that supports your brilliant Legal Brief about Vendor Responsibility...
@@SJR_Media_Group Please cite grammar that supports your random capitalization of common nouns
@@crtlndby Thanks for asking... it's called 'Writing with Flair' so it stands out... caught your attention didn't it ?
It's crazy that the manual would say to use force if necessary to unjam a stuck rudder. I think that's a bad idea and unnecessary, unless the rudder is jammed/stuck in an extreme left or right position and you don't have any other choice.
What's interesting here is 737 had rudder issues in the '90s (resulting in many fatalities). How did a rudder design not last for thirty years without issues?
Why is it an issue if the affected parts have already been removed and replaced?
Our United flight from Seattle to Washington DC on United was delayed for 2+ hrs after a passenger heard a loud bang on the runway. It was a Boeing. 🙄
That happens to airbus as well
The Boeing 737 is officially the modern day DC-10
not
How did the escapes happen at Collins to begin with?
This has happened before. Same symptoms too. There were multiple crashes on “Jurassic” 737 models due to the yaw damper. This isn’t a MAX=BAD thing, this is a general 737 design fault that’s been with us since the ‘60s.
This sounds familiar…
At least its not hard overing in the opposite direction of the inputs
I’d rudder fly with Airbus even more now😂😂😂actually I don’t trust them to go back to work, they would sabotage
So let’s get this straight. Boeing assembly line workers are doing shoddy horrible job, while simultaneously having the nerve to demand higher wages. Wow. Simply wow.
That answer is bendy,as this is a Collins issue
What about all those "reassurances" that the company's bad days are already in the past, and their products have been deemed safe to fly by multiple agencies?!
THE UNITED 585 AND USAIR 427 CURSE IS CREEPING INTO THE MAX.
The rudder on a 737 also crashed Flight 427 20+ years ago
What an astonishingly poor job explaining the issue. This wasn't a Boeing issue, it was a Collins issue. I hate to break it to you boys and girls, but Collins also builds rollout actuators for magic Airbus products. In the same way that LEAP1's power 737MAXs and also power some A320NEO's.
This clickbait video makes it sound like the issue was with the rudder itself. It was not. It was with the rollout actuator. You only use rollout actuators during an autoland. Many airlines don't even do autolands in their 737s.
Correct
United Airlines Flight 585 and USAir Flight 427 rudder problems in the 90's, they don't seem to take the rudder seriously.
Avoid the Boeing 737 Max at all cost!
i wont
If it’s Boeing, I ain’t going.
These reporters are the best actors in the would they needs to be in Hollywood
Sounds like Collins issue and they found it and notified Boeing about the issue. Something that Boeing did not need now.
Like flight 427 ???!
The problem is that the Board of Directors and Management of Boeing needs to change dramatically and the folks on strike need to take an IQ test before they go back to their Assembly jobs or learn Spanish ! Air Bus makes the same planes .
The problem is that for last 10 years, boeing had hired a lot of barely speaking/ reading English people as mechanics and inspectors working in the assembly lines under incompetent management.
If you just bang on the pedal, it might free the tail rudder... or not.
Wow
This is one of the worst aviation stories I have ever heard. Pure click bait with very few facts about the actual issue.
Oh ffs
Another day another broken Boeing
Another day,another airbus fan not realising this is a supply issue
Breaking News! FAA approves a Boeing Designed and Approved Update to their super safe 737 No Good and Max fleet. While it may look like and work like a fashionable turtle neck sweater covering the tail, the material is actually more stretchy.
Well boeing is safer than cars,plus Collins supplies this to magic airbus
Skylar: where did you learn to fly?
The 737 Classic issues are back to roost, to nobody’s surprise
Well? I’m sure there are some people who are surprised it took this long. And there’s a MAX 10 too
Collins fault ,not boeing
Used sometimes?!? Uh no you use it every time! Jfc
NTSB issues ‘urgent’ safety warning for some Boeing 737s, including MAX, in latest blow to struggling planemaker
Since AOG Technics, it’s been downhill
They're catching hands everyday now haha
I flew on one of them over summer and man, let me tell you, I was sweating all the way from Houston to Des Moines in that thing. Dang junky faulty Boeing stuff 😩 I’d rather drive my car than fly Boeing again!
OK, well you are safer in boeing than a car
OMG, this is such a non-story. That "expert" sucks. Please, whoever sees this story PLEASE! Do not listen to it.
Boeing Roulette...
It is well known that if you had not paid extra, you have no right to expect to fly safely.
Boeing does what it cares about most, K¡lls.
How is this plane not grounded? Oh wait it’s all about $$$$$$$$ and lobbyists…
As long as the FAA and the government is not involved, it’s good. No plane should ever be “grounded “by government. That’s absolutely ridiculous and prideful for them to do that.
@@BlindBiker3because Collins supplies this part to airbus as well
@@AbdullahNajib-b9z I don’t care who supplied it, or what the design was, government is at fault. Government workers are at fault. They are the evil sinister people who are behind this who plot to destroy Boeing., shame on lawmakers, shame on Biden. Shame on government. They destroy companies in peoples lives, and they revel in doing so.
That "aviation analyst" has less knowledge about rudders than 98% of kids who play flight sim on their xbox. Probably flew for Clown ahh airlines
737 MAX again...
Collins fault
so much wrong with Boeing!!💀🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
Collins fault
My entire Democratic family will not vote Harris
Hopefully and finish ending business in the USA and lead to the first fourth world country in the world with more debt than total value especially when there is no business of value. Welfare is worthless in world value but buying millions of votes.
GOOD
😂😂😂. I wanna yell at this so bad but I’m not gonna take the bait 😂. Enjoy your weekend bot and your owner 🙏
Wow more problems and their Union is wanting more pay . Seems like they have a lot of quality problems . Makes you not want to fly anywhere especially on a Boeing plane . Their logo should be dly at your own risk.
I totally agree. You literally couldn't pay me to fly in one of them!
Boeing crashes less than cars
welcome to another episode on why Boeing is an embarrassment to aviation.
welcome to another episode of airbus fans not realising collins supplies these parts to airbus as well
@@AbdullahNajib-b9z welcome to another episode of people thinking saying something bad about boeing means they're an airbus fan.
Thomas Robert Young Scott Jackson Timothy
Revision E
This feels like a hit job against Boeing at this point
boing
Boeing aircraft were poorly built. The problems will continue.
no they are not.
@@AbdullahNajib-b9z Oh really? That why Boeing paid fines, was forced to limit production, got chewed out by the NTSB, fined by the FAA, subpoenaed for congressional hearings, had BOD members resign, not to mention the deaths of two whistleblowers. Boeing is a skeleton of its former self. Right now they’re behind schedule with Air Force One, the tanker aircraft for the Air Force, Starliner, not to mention all the airline orders it’s behind on.
@@AbdullahNajib-b9z I answered the above post, but I noticed it’s now missing.
Iiiittttssss ooookkkaaaaa. 😂😂😂😂
m&m
Alaska Airlines Flight 261
That wasn't even a 737 nor was it the rudder that caused that issue......Nor was it even a manufacture flaw. The airline was 100 percent to blame for that crash.
@@NovejSpeed3 I think their point was issues with the tail are major issues.
@@NovejSpeed3
The rudder is in the Vertical Stabilizer.
We as outsiders do not know how the internal components interact with each other. So in that case… the Swiss Cheese Model plays into effect from the start of the announcement for the Rudder issues on the 737s.
Everything is connected. Aviation Safety is the overall picture.
It was the rudder...it was jammed.@@NovejSpeed3
If its Boeing, I ain't going.
well collins makes these things for magic airbus as well