Question: How do these laws apply to a customer when a sole proprietor deems their behavior unacceptable and refuses service. Aside from the obvious shoes and shirt required are there cases that might define these boundaries?
That would strike me as a property rights issue on the part of the business owner as long as the refusal of service is due to someone’s behavior and not because of their demographics.
Even if (for example) the arbitrary deprivation of property is targeted based on race, that is still a civil liberties violation. The way I tend to think of it is that civil rights are about equality of opportunity and access to voting and that civil liberties are the “leave me alone” rights.
My class is doing a mock trial on if President Jackson violated states' rights in his dealings with South Carolina in the nullification crisis. I have to argue that he did not violate states rights help me with info please
Esteeven Cepeda how much time do you have? I’d first start by just listing bullet points of the evidence against you: what did Jackson do during the crisis and what laws did he try to enforce. Then why might someone think that is a violation of states rights. Once you’ve listed that, you have a concrete target to attack. Side note: I assume that the debate centers around questions of what the law is and what a states rights are and not what the facts on the ground were of what Jackson actually did. That makes it more like a mock appellate case.
If you want a webcomic that goes in-depth with the 4th and 5th amendments, read “Illustrated Guide to the Law” lawcomic.net/ also teaches self-defense and insanity defence if you are curious
Are you available for chat? I live in New Jersey my sister lives in Lincoln Nebraska her whole Constitution has been violated her whole person has been violated she's been falsely accused falsely arrest falsely imprisoned 3 months she's been in jail has not been seen by a lawyer about her case only about coming up with the money to get her out he insist she pays she has not had any trial has not seen anybody no one's talk to her about her side and it goes on and on and on would you be available to chat please let me know thank you for your video
Much better than CrashCourse. Thank you!
I hear this a lot. Glad I could help!
Thank you so much!!! I've been scratching my head over how these applied to court cases and you cleared that right up! You're awesome!
Glad I can help!
Please post a whole course video series on Government, Richey! We love your work!!
i'm in pols 301 in college and this helped me so much thank you!!!
Best video yet that I that I have watched on this issue. Thank you.
Holy that gunshot caught me off guard
Thank you Matt Damon!
Thanks you very much.
I am from Fiji Island you explain me what rights I have to be American.
Why am I having such a difficult time finding cases involving government employees charged with a crime under title 18-242 ?
Amazing video! helped me put so much 👍🏼👏🏼
Excellent explanation!
Question: How do these laws apply to a customer when a sole proprietor deems their behavior unacceptable and refuses service. Aside from the obvious shoes and shirt required are there cases that might define these boundaries?
That would strike me as a property rights issue on the part of the business owner as long as the refusal of service is due to someone’s behavior and not because of their demographics.
This is why you can be pro life or pro choice. You have the right to choose.
great vid, man!
Even if (for example) the arbitrary deprivation of property is targeted based on race, that is still a civil liberties violation.
The way I tend to think of it is that civil rights are about equality of opportunity and access to voting and that civil liberties are the “leave me alone” rights.
There is definitely some overlap. Thanks for the thoughtful analysis!
Currently doing APUSH homework help
Thank you
Gracias great video:)
Greetings from El Paso, Tx!!
Love thank you
My class is doing a mock trial on if President Jackson violated states' rights in his dealings with South Carolina in the nullification crisis. I have to argue that he did not violate states rights help me with info please
Esteeven Cepeda how much time do you have? I’d first start by just listing bullet points of the evidence against you: what did Jackson do during the crisis and what laws did he try to enforce. Then why might someone think that is a violation of states rights. Once you’ve listed that, you have a concrete target to attack.
Side note: I assume that the debate centers around questions of what the law is and what a states rights are and not what the facts on the ground were of what Jackson actually did. That makes it more like a mock appellate case.
It is due tonight, thanks for the advice
If you want a webcomic that goes in-depth with the 4th and 5th amendments, read “Illustrated Guide to the Law” lawcomic.net/ also teaches self-defense and insanity defence if you are curious
Why are you posting at 1 am?
Most UA-camrs set a video to post ahead of time. 1 am could be a random choice. Unless, of course, he is a night owl. Hoot Hoot
For all the expats in Europe that like to review high school history during their morning workouts
got em
So the debate on abortion the woman’s side is a liberty and the unborn, if they had them it would be a right. The right to life
Are you available for chat?
I live in New Jersey my sister lives in Lincoln Nebraska her whole Constitution has been violated her whole person has been violated she's been falsely accused falsely arrest falsely imprisoned 3 months she's been in jail has not been seen by a lawyer about her case only about coming up with the money to get her out he insist she pays she has not had any trial has not seen anybody no one's talk to her about her side and it goes on and on and on would you be available to chat please let me know thank you for your video
Which podcast or TV show/ movie have I seen you on before? That or you remind me of some other guy... almost like Theo Von...
There is nothing in the Constitution that allows us any recourse when they are violated.
Religion, privacy, speech, press PPD terrorizes citizens of the city of brotherly love 💕
HI, HOWDY? MY GOOD LOOKING FRIEND!!!
#metoo
Don't tread on me
Thank you Matt Damon!