6:31 It clearly shows that exceeding Italy and Spain in terms of GDP per capita by a bunch of Central/Eastern European countries is a question of near future. IF Italy and Spain get masses of "engineers" from Africa it may be actually very soon.
Italy got overtaken by Slovenia many years ago and Czechia in 2019. Spain got overtaken even before. It rebound again, but the economy per capita is on same level. Italians have a little bit higher salaries (nominal) but a bit higher prices. But Italy and Spain have also far higher unemployment and much higher debt per person. So per capita Czechs, Slovenians or Estonians can be considered wealthier, or definitely having better prospects. Ive for example lived in Prague and met many Italians from central and southern Italy who came here for a job and life. Most of them told me that for the same job in Rome they would be paid 20% less and know this guy that knows that guy because getting a job for your skills without family/social connections is literally impossible in Italy but pretty common in CZ. They didnt even got to a job interview because the company always hired someone from a wide family or friend, despite having much worse skills and training.
I think we're, since 2008, on the way to a change of paradigm. Since 1945 to 2008, Europe was divided in West (the affluent part) and East (the least affluent part). Now we're going to a North-South division of Europe where the North (pretty much everywhere North of Genova and Venice) becomes Europe's powerhouse whereas the South becomes not much more than Europe's shield against Africa, as well as the cheap holiday destination for the rest of Europe. This means some countries that were in the "privileged" part of Europe in 1945-2008 (like Spain, Portugal, Italy and Greece that were Western but now are Southern in this Europe's division) are now in constant decay, while others that were Eastern but are now Northern like the Baltics, Slovenia and the Visegrad countries minus Hungary, are going to be constantly on the rise. Of course, this also means some countries will clearly affirm their pertaining to the "privileged" Europe (those that used to be Western and are now Northern, such as Scandinavia, Finland, Iceland, Germany, Austria, Switzerland, the Benelux and the British Isles... France is a bit of a mixed bag that even though not to the same extent as Spain or Italy, is also showing some strong signs of decay in the near or middle-term future), while those that were Eastern in the 20th Century but are now Southern in the 21st Century are the ones who will keep their status as the lowest of the low in Europe's food chain (Albania, Bulgaria, Romania, Moldova and most of ex-Yugoslavia except Slovenia and maybe, perhaps, Croatia). There are two cases, however, that can be confusing: France and Hungary.
@@Aggoenixyou see, I'm Spanish and I live in the Netherlands, I have neighbours and coworkers from pretty much every EU country, and one thing I realised is that people from the ex-Communist Europe (not only Czechs, Slovenes, Poles or Lithuanians, but also Slovaks, Hungarians and even Romanians and Bulgarians) think their country is doing much better now in 2024 than it was doing in 2004, and are also hopeful and firmly convinced their countries will be doing better in 2034 than they're doing now. On the other hand, if you ask an Italian, a Greek or a Portuguese, they (we) all tend to agree our country was much better off in 2004 than it is today, and our country in 2034 will be far worse off and more decadent than it is now, so there's 0 units of hope of changing at least for the better in Southern Europe. And well, I myself think Spain (or at least big Spanish cities like Madrid, Barcelona, Valencia, Seville and Bilbao) will have no-go zones in 2034-2035 taken by illegal immigrants, unemployment and criminality, but even more precarious than the no-go zones in France, Belgium or Sweden are today, as unemployment has always been ravaging our productive system and locals will be affected by these no-go zones to a greater extent than locals in Marseille, Brussels or Malmö are.
@@unpassant5525 good point.. but title.. The Richest Capitals in EUROPEAN UNION.. The Treaty on European Union, commonly known as the Maastricht Treaty, is the foundation treaty of the European Union (EU). Concluded in 1992 between the then-twelve member states.. you got me for a second 😉
@@donaveron Don't be silly, they show the figures since 1960 including countries that were not EU members until recently. They did it like Germany appears in 1991 which is simply wrong. German capital should be present since 1960, it is very simple. Bonn was one of the richest.
@@IvanJeknic Yes, but Slovenia existed before that. The capitals are represented from the sixties even though they weren't in the EU yet, Stockholm for instance.
It's got Dublin as one of the rich cities in the sixties, that's crazy I lived there at that time, the Irish economy had a GDP of one billion back then
The independent country Slovenia did not exist in 1980, just like Serbia or Russia, etc. But the Slovenia was one of the socialist republics of Yugoslavia.
What is the GDP ???? ask an average Dubliner or .... whatever 🤮🤮🤮🤠🥳is. only. to show off learnt from America ( if in a country more than ,~15% percent are really poor or in a city ir country the livingcosts almost higher than nummerical high pay cheque 🥱🥱🥱🤠🥳🥳
6:31 It clearly shows that exceeding Italy and Spain in terms of GDP per capita by a bunch of Central/Eastern European countries is a question of near future. IF Italy and Spain get masses of "engineers" from Africa it may be actually very soon.
Italy got overtaken by Slovenia many years ago and Czechia in 2019. Spain got overtaken even before. It rebound again, but the economy per capita is on same level. Italians have a little bit higher salaries (nominal) but a bit higher prices. But Italy and Spain have also far higher unemployment and much higher debt per person. So per capita Czechs, Slovenians or Estonians can be considered wealthier, or definitely having better prospects. Ive for example lived in Prague and met many Italians from central and southern Italy who came here for a job and life. Most of them told me that for the same job in Rome they would be paid 20% less and know this guy that knows that guy because getting a job for your skills without family/social connections is literally impossible in Italy but pretty common in CZ. They didnt even got to a job interview because the company always hired someone from a wide family or friend, despite having much worse skills and training.
I think we're, since 2008, on the way to a change of paradigm.
Since 1945 to 2008, Europe was divided in West (the affluent part) and East (the least affluent part). Now we're going to a North-South division of Europe where the North (pretty much everywhere North of Genova and Venice) becomes Europe's powerhouse whereas the South becomes not much more than Europe's shield against Africa, as well as the cheap holiday destination for the rest of Europe. This means some countries that were in the "privileged" part of Europe in 1945-2008 (like Spain, Portugal, Italy and Greece that were Western but now are Southern in this Europe's division) are now in constant decay, while others that were Eastern but are now Northern like the Baltics, Slovenia and the Visegrad countries minus Hungary, are going to be constantly on the rise.
Of course, this also means some countries will clearly affirm their pertaining to the "privileged" Europe (those that used to be Western and are now Northern, such as Scandinavia, Finland, Iceland, Germany, Austria, Switzerland, the Benelux and the British Isles... France is a bit of a mixed bag that even though not to the same extent as Spain or Italy, is also showing some strong signs of decay in the near or middle-term future), while those that were Eastern in the 20th Century but are now Southern in the 21st Century are the ones who will keep their status as the lowest of the low in Europe's food chain (Albania, Bulgaria, Romania, Moldova and most of ex-Yugoslavia except Slovenia and maybe, perhaps, Croatia).
There are two cases, however, that can be confusing: France and Hungary.
@@Aggoenixyou see, I'm Spanish and I live in the Netherlands, I have neighbours and coworkers from pretty much every EU country, and one thing I realised is that people from the ex-Communist Europe (not only Czechs, Slovenes, Poles or Lithuanians, but also Slovaks, Hungarians and even Romanians and Bulgarians) think their country is doing much better now in 2024 than it was doing in 2004, and are also hopeful and firmly convinced their countries will be doing better in 2034 than they're doing now. On the other hand, if you ask an Italian, a Greek or a Portuguese, they (we) all tend to agree our country was much better off in 2004 than it is today, and our country in 2034 will be far worse off and more decadent than it is now, so there's 0 units of hope of changing at least for the better in Southern Europe.
And well, I myself think Spain (or at least big Spanish cities like Madrid, Barcelona, Valencia, Seville and Bilbao) will have no-go zones in 2034-2035 taken by illegal immigrants, unemployment and criminality, but even more precarious than the no-go zones in France, Belgium or Sweden are today, as unemployment has always been ravaging our productive system and locals will be affected by these no-go zones to a greater extent than locals in Marseille, Brussels or Malmö are.
@@Aggoenix southern Italians would migrate to Iraq and say life there is better
Es ist beschämend wie unser deutsches Land den Bach runtergehen dank dieser Politik wir haben unser Land verkauft😢😢😢😢😢
48*1*13
Berlin ist auf der Höhe von Prag und Talin, also ungefähr auf Platz 10 Tendenz nach unten.
59*2*16'swa
Vilnius should be in the list
My country Sweden best under the 60:s
Tln & Hki together are best!!! 🇪🇪🇫🇮
Yes then came the Euro which was actually the biggest change. Everything became twice as expensive and Amsterdam profited from it and other cities.
Nice to see the tax havens at the top!
My favorite European countries 🇧🇾🇨🇾🇧🇦
Belarus is an oriental despotism.
🇧🇾 is third world
Belarus? Get treatment for your legs because it's too late for your head.
bot
@@MonaLisa-unique you ? Maybe
Sad London can no longer be on this list.
Ez egy hűlyeség.😊
🇩🇰🇩🇰🇩🇰🙏🏼
Bucharest top 10 ahead of Vienna, Berlin, Athens and Rome in the 60s, I don’t think so 😂
Where is London?
They've erased all history of the UK being in the EU ;)
What is a London?
between Afghanistan and Pakistan
🇨🇿🇨🇿🇨🇿💪🏻
Yaaaay we passed Madrid and Rome this year!
As if it was that special.
Give it 20 years and even Rabat is gonna pass Madrid and Rome.
Warsaw ❤
Budapest best ever !!
Where is Germany with Bonn?
so read the title of the video and you'll understand
@@donaveron Read a history book and you'll understand. Bonn was the capital of West Germany until 1990.
@@unpassant5525 good point.. but title.. The Richest Capitals in EUROPEAN UNION.. The Treaty on European Union, commonly known as the Maastricht Treaty, is the foundation treaty of the European Union (EU). Concluded in 1992 between the then-twelve member states.. you got me for a second 😉
@@donaveron Don't be silly, they show the figures since 1960 including countries that were not EU members until recently. They did it like Germany appears in 1991 which is simply wrong. German capital should be present since 1960, it is very simple. Bonn was one of the richest.
Why slovenia is here,slovenia was part of yugoslavia the flag is not yugoslavia,slovenia become in 1991?
I don't understand your question, Slovenia is in the EU, which this chart is about.
@@haga2519 but slovenia became in 91 you show slovenia before 1991
@@IvanJeknic Yes, but Slovenia existed before that. The capitals are represented from the sixties even though they weren't in the EU yet, Stockholm for instance.
I wouldn't call Dublin the richest, I'd use the word greediest.
It's got Dublin as one of the rich cities in the sixties, that's crazy I lived there at that time, the Irish economy had a GDP of one billion back then
At least we didnt have slavery like most other western European countries.
Irish live very very well compared to most of Europe. You dont know how good you have it compared to eastern and southern europeans...
Haha Berlin is so f***ed up
❤❤❤❤❤SLOVAKIA 💙💙💙💙💙
Bucharest being on number 9, beating Berlin, Viena, Rome and Dublin
Si esta en el puesto 20...
En este año...
Funny money tax dodgers at the top.
Offshore money grubbers.
Dublin on the fiddle 😂
Slovenia in 1980 s did not exist
But Lubljana existed
The independent country Slovenia did not exist in 1980, just like Serbia or Russia, etc. But the Slovenia was one of the socialist republics of Yugoslavia.
Iťs wrong - wher Is Germany?
Tienes a berlin en el puesto 10.
Son capitales.
London never appears. Makes no sense.
The list is idiotic on many levels. Ljubljana shown in time when it was not capital
London is no longer in EU...Ljubljana was capital of Slovenia inside Yugoslavia fedaration...so thats make sence...
@@institut_nadeje London was in the EU for many years but, as I said, never appears in the graphic.
Its wrong...
Vaduz ????
per forza ci sono solo banche !
Liechenstein isnt in EU
@@lizardking2779 : ok,. thx
Одна сплошная ложь
Усім ж відомо що правда тільки на мокшанських болотах 😅
Looking fir Norway, then i found out it was EU not europe😂
jajajajajajajaja
69*4*22
What is the GDP ???? ask an average Dubliner or .... whatever 🤮🤮🤮🤠🥳is. only. to show off learnt from America ( if in a country more than ,~15% percent are really poor or in a city ir country the livingcosts almost higher than nummerical high pay cheque 🥱🥱🥱🤠🥳🥳
66*3*19
72*6*25
73*6*26