A blessed day to you ma'am! Thank you for sharing this informative video. I'm blessed beyond words. Keep up the good work for the glory of God! God bless you ma'am!
there is no word to show my gratitude towards u. mam if possible, please make a video on questionnaire translation and adaptation. I am waiting for your video.
very nice explanation. please clarify 2 things: 1. we used scores on content relevance, but dont we have to do anything with scores of clarity? 2. is this process only for validating a newly designed questionnaire or also for a translated version of validated questionnaire?
Good day taru dewan. First, clarity is for the checking on the use of language and as your guide in revising your statement, not the content of your statement, and so, there is no such thing as clarity validation. Second, this process is only used for validating newly designed questionnaire which is not yet validated.
Hello po Ma'am, thank you very much for this very informative and simple video. I was able to clearly understand how to calculate for CVI. May I kindly ask po what would be the interpretation if you have more than 5 experts? Thank you.
thanks mam @cherryannballad1562 for appreciating my work. You have many experts if you have more than five. Honestly, if there are more than five, I do not know the value.
@@angelitobalboa412 Good day!, In this video, face validity is already included. Instructions, and clarity of the sentences are already a part of the face validation.
Thank you for your video. Suppose you have multiple choice questions as a way to assess knowledge. Does it change anything in the above procedure you mentioned? Do you still write it in statement for along with the correct answer? Also there's an error on your page @3:26 , the Likert scale option for #5 should be Strongly Agree
Ma'am, may I ask if who are considered to be an expert or what are the qualifications of the word expert? Is there a requirements if who to considered as expert? Thus it need outside of the target population? Thank you
Good day christine mollejon. Experts are the persons who are specialists in the subject area. For instance, your study is about mental health, experts in this area include, psychologists, psychiatrists, or mental health nurses. If your study is about pedagogies, experts are the teachers or educators who are experts in that pedagogies. I hope, i answered your question.
Ma'am if the experts told to modify and combine 3 items and make it one item in that case what we will do? Should we write all the 3items relevant in CVI?
Good day po ma'am. Your video is really informative and very easy to understand. I just have follow up questions po. Ano po first gawin? Ipa validate sa experts yung questionnaire or yung checking of internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha? Tapos po when using Cronbach's alpha, how to get the sample size po? Or anong sample size po yung valid to undergo Cronbach's alpha? Thank you so much po
@@RenzOnlineAcademy888 Hello po Maam. As an undergraduate student and conducting research in the field of education po, I accidentally watched your video po last night. Since I and my groupmates are looking for someone who have their big hand to help us in validating our researcher-made questionnaire. Honestly po, this video is the most related and easy to understand than the other videos I watched. I am hoping po that you will help me by allowing me and my groupmates to ask a favor from you. Really badly needed po Maam. I hope you notice me po @Renz Online Academy. Thank you Maam.
You and your groupmates may subscribe to this channel so that you will be notified for a new video related to research. Most of my clients are pre-service teachers and in-service teachers, and students.
What if S CVI on basis of I CVI (0.8)and on basis of PR (0.8) comes in range, but SCVI on basis of UA (0.6)is not....then how to interpret Content validity
Dr Shubba Singhal, if SCVI is 0.6, that means is below satisfactory. There is a need to add more items or reduce the number of items in the questionnaire. Thank you
Good day Azaima Razali. Experts are the persons who are specialists in the subject area. For instance, your study is about mental health, experts in this area include, psychologists, psychiatrists, or mental health nurses. If your study is about pedagogies, experts are the teachers or educators who are experts in that pedagogies. I hope, i answered your question.
Good day ma'am. Thank you for considering it as a reference. You may cite it as- Renz Online Academy. How to validate a research questionnaire for research paper, thesis, and dissertation. ua-cam.com/video/lhKXkIuk7Hw/v-deo.html&lc=UgwxX4K8t2JRLYQ7ZNR4AaABAg
@@RenzOnlineAcademy888 thank you ma'am, that is very helpful. i have another question po. how can we report the result of our reliability computation in our manuscript. sa table po ba is isasama lang ang I-CVI, UA, S CVI, S-CVI UA. tapos and description.? ano po ang format?
Thank you so much for your very clear and informative instructions. My questions is, how can I translate or present the results of my validity findings into my dissertation research project? Or, can I just do a general description stating that I have used Yosuff's manual on the "ABC of Content Validation and Content Validity Index Calculation" to validate my reserch survey questions? I would appreciate it very much if you could help my clarify my questions. And yes, I have subscribed to your channel.
Thank you for subscribing. I would also appreciate if you can share it to others. Regarding your query, you may just state "The questionnaire used was validated and has achieved satisfactory level of content validity index with S-CVI average = __, S-CVI UA = __, and SCVI average based on proportion relevance = ___". Then the table of CVI should be included under appendix.
@@RenzOnlineAcademy888 Wow! Thank you so much for your prompt reply and clear suggestion. Yes, I have shared your channel to my classmates and colleagues. My apologies but I have another question/query. So, I supposed all my survey questions must be validated, including the demographics ones? Thank you again for your expertise, which has been very helpful! God bless you!
Hello Ma'am, I hope this finds you well. I have some more queries, if I may: 1. Do happen to know the name of the model of the content validity method? (I did not read any on the article). 2. Would this method be sufficient to have all my survey questionnaires validate so that I don't have to ask an statistician to validate them? 3. Would it be appropriate to use your UA-cam presentation as a reference/footnote in my research project? Many thanks again po!
Mam ask ko lang po What statistical treatment are applicable to 1 Face Validity 2 Content Validity 3 Construct Validity 4 Criterion related Validity Thank you po in advance
@@mathtuklaswithsirjojo2077 Good day Sir. There is no statistical test for face and content validity, but you can compute the validity through CVI, refer to video. For construct and criterion validity, you may use correlation test if you want to test the validity of your questionnaire against a standardize test. The use of statistical test , depends on the purpose of your questionnaire, and the constructs of your study.
@@RenzOnlineAcademy888 have good day Mam, have you any video regaurd construct validity and correlation test, actualy iam confused my study survey questionaire validity and reliability. thanking you in anticipation
If you find this video helpful, you may click the thanks button. Thank you.
This is a very incisively done video on CVI, well done. It clearly explains how the score is obtained
thank u @hozeawarren-re8ox for appreciating my content
A blessed day to you ma'am! Thank you for sharing this informative video. I'm blessed beyond words. Keep up the good work for the glory of God! God bless you ma'am!
Thank you Ma'am Abigail.
Thank you po.. Very clear and simple..God Bless po Ma'am..❤❤❤👏👏👏
You can support this channel by buying super thanks. Click the 3 buttons, thanks, buy and send. SALAMAT sa support!
Wow! Impressing and very understandable discussion maam.
Galing! Ngyon ko lng to naintindihan... thank you mam!
welcome
I like it. Thank you very much for the detailed explanation!
salamat po. very helpful video! thanks from Malaysia!
thank u mam @sailormoon8924 for appreciating my content
Thank you so much Mam. You were able to explain it very clear. God bless you!
Glad it was helpful!
Very simple and clear. Many Thanks!
Thank you Ma'am Renz for a detailed information.
my pleasure, thanks for appreciating it
Really worth it to found this video maam!
there is no word to show my gratitude towards u.
mam if possible, please make a video on questionnaire translation and adaptation.
I am waiting for your video.
Madhu Maurya, thank you for your comment. I will try to make a vid about your request.
Crystal Clear Explanation. Thank you very much Professor.
welcome po
Yey, naintindihan ko na 😊 salamat
salamat din
FABULOUS indeed, thanks Ma'am!
thank you hadoo
Thank you so much. God bless you ma'am
Simple. to understand. What are the CVI values if the experts are more than 5? Can you provide a reference?
It is very helpful mam
Thank you
Excellent
thank you
very nice explanation. please clarify 2 things: 1. we used scores on content relevance, but dont we have to do anything with scores of clarity? 2. is this process only for validating a newly designed questionnaire or also for a translated version of validated questionnaire?
Good day taru dewan. First, clarity is for the checking on the use of language and as your guide in revising your statement, not the content of your statement, and so, there is no such thing as clarity validation. Second, this process is only used for validating newly designed questionnaire which is not yet validated.
@@RenzOnlineAcademy888 Thank you for replying.
Wow!
Thanks so much for the video.
Much appreciated👍
welcome , thanks for appreciating my video
Hello po Ma'am, thank you very much for this very informative and simple video. I was able to clearly understand how to calculate for CVI. May I kindly ask po what would be the interpretation if you have more than 5 experts? Thank you.
thanks mam @cherryannballad1562 for appreciating my work. You have many experts if you have more than five. Honestly, if there are more than five, I do not know the value.
I'm confused in the column of Expert in Agreement e.g., how did you bring 3 +4 = 2 (Expert in Agreement). Please explain
VERY EASY TO FOLLOW! ♥
Thank you
Welcome.
incredibly helpful! thank you!
my pleasure, you may subscribe Ms. @Eunice Ann Gutierrez for more videos, thank you.
Very clear
thank you Ezhumalai G
Thank you very much! very clear!
thanks for your appreciation
@@RenzOnlineAcademy888 question po, do you have video or resource how to do face validity?
@@angelitobalboa412 Good day!, In this video, face validity is already included. Instructions, and clarity of the sentences are already a part of the face validation.
@@RenzOnlineAcademy888 oh ok got it po! Thanks!
@@angelitobalboa412 good luck
Thank you so much for sharing 🌷
Thank you very much !
thank u @fatimakassymbekova6951
Clarity at revance lang po ba ang kinokompute s cvi?
THANK YOU PO MA'AM!
it's my pleasure Joseph Doligues . You may subscribe for more videos. Thank you.
Thank you so much
My pleasure to help ma'am
Thank you for your video. Suppose you have multiple choice questions as a way to assess knowledge. Does it change anything in the above procedure you mentioned? Do you still write it in statement for along with the correct answer?
Also there's an error on your page @3:26 , the Likert scale option for #5 should be Strongly Agree
Not at all, and thank you for the comment
Thank u very much 💖
You are welcome zamin abbas. You may subscribe for more videos. Thank you!
I heard the chooks in the background.. lol
Ma'am, may I ask if who are considered to be an expert or what are the qualifications of the word expert? Is there a requirements if who to considered as expert? Thus it need outside of the target population? Thank you
Good day christine mollejon. Experts are the persons who are specialists in the subject area. For instance, your study is about mental health, experts in this area include, psychologists, psychiatrists, or mental health nurses. If your study is about pedagogies, experts are the teachers or educators who are experts in that pedagogies. I hope, i answered your question.
good day mam, 0.8 + 1 is 1.8 po diba
can i use 5 likert scale instead of 4?
yes
can you also validate your survey without using experts after your survey is finished?
Good day! Content validation is important
Can you tell me how I can measure content validity. And is there a way to measure validity by using statistic tool like SPSS?
@@warofpope6571 you can measure content validity through content validity index.
Hello po ma'am, tanong ko lang po.. ginagamit din po ba itong CVI para sa adapted survey questionnaire? Salamat po.
Thank you!
you're welcome, hope you can share this to your friends
Ma'am if the experts told to modify and combine 3 items and make it one item in that case what we will do? Should we write all the 3items relevant in CVI?
Good day, that will be considered as one item.
Good day! Ma'am, is "clarity" no longer included in the calculation of CVI?
Yes sir, I just include it for face validity
Why did you calculate Cvi why not CVR for survey validation
good day, its because content is being assessed
Good day po ma'am. Your video is really informative and very easy to understand. I just have follow up questions po. Ano po first gawin? Ipa validate sa experts yung questionnaire or yung checking of internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha? Tapos po when using Cronbach's alpha, how to get the sample size po? Or anong sample size po yung valid to undergo Cronbach's alpha? Thank you so much po
Thank you for the comment. Validation of experts first before internal consistency.
Thank you so much po for your comment ma'am. Pano po yung sa number of participants na valid po to undeego cronbach's alpha?
@@norliegabriel1729 the number of participants to undergo Cronbach's alpha depends on your sample size
Do we still have to use cronbachs alpha if we already did this to validate the questionnaire po? Thank you so much
This vid is just about content validity, there is still a need to test its reliability using Cronbach alpha.
Thank you so much po!
welcome po
@@RenzOnlineAcademy888 Hello po Maam. As an undergraduate student and conducting research in the field of education po, I accidentally watched your video po last night. Since I and my groupmates are looking for someone who have their big hand to help us in validating our researcher-made questionnaire. Honestly po, this video is the most related and easy to understand than the other videos I watched. I am hoping po that you will help me by allowing me and my groupmates to ask a favor from you. Really badly needed po Maam. I hope you notice me po @Renz Online Academy. Thank you Maam.
@@louvellapetep.landicho90 okey
You and your groupmates may subscribe to this channel so that you will be notified for a new video related to research. Most of my clients are pre-service teachers and in-service teachers, and students.
Good day maam! We're done subscribing to your channel. How can we address you po? Thank you maam.
What if S CVI on basis of I CVI (0.8)and on basis of PR (0.8) comes in range, but SCVI on basis of UA (0.6)is not....then how to interpret Content validity
Dr Shubba Singhal, if SCVI is 0.6, that means is below satisfactory. There is a need to add more items or reduce the number of items in the questionnaire. Thank you
What type of validation is this?
content validation @abdulfatahsarangani7527
how do you choose the expert? is there a criteria who the experts should be?
Good day Azaima Razali. Experts are the persons who are specialists in the subject area. For instance, your study is about mental health, experts in this area include, psychologists, psychiatrists, or mental health nurses. If your study is about pedagogies, experts are the teachers or educators who are experts in that pedagogies. I hope, i answered your question.
what if ma'am about sya sa life satisfaction ano po kayang expertise ang hahanapin namin??
@@guaguawest9298psychometricians and psychologists are good choices in that particular topic
Thanks...
My pleasure Mohamed Omer
What to do when our questionaire is not valid?
Good day Edward Cullen. If the questionnaire is computed not valid, try to add or delete some questions then recompute.
Hi Ma'am. Is this computation available to various types of validation/rating sheet?
yes Ice Bear
ma'am ano po ang APA format nito pag isasama na sa manuscript?
Good day ma'am. Thank you for considering it as a reference. You may cite it as- Renz Online Academy. How to validate a research questionnaire for research paper, thesis, and dissertation. ua-cam.com/video/lhKXkIuk7Hw/v-deo.html&lc=UgwxX4K8t2JRLYQ7ZNR4AaABAg
@@RenzOnlineAcademy888 thank you ma'am, that is very helpful. i have another question po.
how can we report the result of our reliability computation in our manuscript. sa table po ba is isasama lang ang I-CVI, UA, S CVI, S-CVI UA. tapos and description.? ano po ang format?
Good Day po ma'am.. how about the clarity? The same process to calculate??
there's no need to calculate about the clarity. Whatever would be the remarks of the expert, just change it
Thank you so much for your very clear and informative instructions. My questions is, how can I translate or present the results of my validity findings into my dissertation research project? Or, can I just do a general description stating that I have used Yosuff's manual on the "ABC of Content Validation and Content Validity Index Calculation" to validate my reserch survey questions? I would appreciate it very much if you could help my clarify my questions. And yes, I have subscribed to your channel.
Thank you for subscribing. I would also appreciate if you can share it to others. Regarding your query, you may just state "The questionnaire used was validated and has achieved satisfactory level of content validity index with S-CVI average = __, S-CVI UA = __, and SCVI average based on proportion relevance = ___". Then the table of CVI should be included under appendix.
@@RenzOnlineAcademy888 Wow! Thank you so much for your prompt reply and clear suggestion. Yes, I have shared your channel to my classmates and colleagues. My apologies but I have another question/query. So, I supposed all my survey questions must be validated, including the demographics ones? Thank you again for your expertise, which has been very helpful! God bless you!
@@tondolnative7270 yes, all the questions must be validated.
@@RenzOnlineAcademy888 Thanks so much again for your quick answer to my query.
Hello Ma'am, I hope this finds you well. I have some more queries, if I may:
1. Do happen to know the name of the model of the content validity method? (I did not read any on the article).
2. Would this method be sufficient to have all my survey questionnaires validate so that I don't have to ask an statistician to validate them?
3. Would it be appropriate to use your UA-cam presentation as a reference/footnote in my research project?
Many thanks again po!
good day po.. okay lang po ba content validity gawin sa self constructed quesionnaire? May EFA po at CFA?
good day! yes but kuin mo din ang content reliability
@@RenzOnlineAcademy888 aready done with content validity po.. is it enough po? no need for EFA AND CFA??
@@Ayyazon you may proceed to reliability test
Hello po ma'am, paano po i reliability test yung 3 sets of questionnaire?
Good day Gtv. Try watching my vid about validity vs reliability.
Hi mam. How much should I pay for a validator?
Hello mam Amparo. It depends po sa validator, but i think mura lang po
😀
kindly mentioned the reference thank you
Good day! The reference is shown below the video.
@@RenzOnlineAcademy888 have good day! thank you
Good day XYSSAJ JOY! The whole questionnaire should be validated. If you still have questions, just feel free to ask, thank you.
Mam baka po pwd magkaroon Ng video on
Construct validity
And criterion related validy
Salamat
Nalilito po kz ako dyan
God bless po
Mam ask ko lang po
What statistical treatment are applicable to
1 Face Validity
2 Content Validity
3 Construct Validity
4 Criterion related Validity
Thank you po in advance
@@mathtuklaswithsirjojo2077 Good day Sir. There is no statistical test for face and content validity, but you can compute the validity through CVI, refer to video. For construct and criterion validity, you may use correlation test if you want to test the validity of your questionnaire against a standardize test. The use of statistical test , depends on the purpose of your questionnaire, and the constructs of your study.
@@RenzOnlineAcademy888 Thank you mam sa info
@@RenzOnlineAcademy888 have good day Mam, have you any video regaurd construct validity and correlation test, actualy iam confused my study survey questionaire validity and reliability.
thanking you in anticipation
I'm confused in the column of Expert in Agreement e.g., how did you bring 3 +4 = 2 (Expert in Agreement). Please explain
Good day @dr.kamrankundi9819. The number 2 in expert agreement means the 2 experts agreed that the item is relevant. It is not adding 3 and 4