Dick’s Tricks - Leonard Susskind - 5/11/2018

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 вер 2024
  • On May 11 & 12, 2018, Caltech and PMA presented Feynman 100, a celebration of Richard Feynman’s life & legacy on the occasion of his 100th birthday.
    The May 11 evening event celebrated his broad contributions to science and society as a scientist, teacher, and curious character. Speakers included: Robbert Dijkgraaf, Freeman Dyson, Joan Feynman, Michelle Feynman, Janna Levin, John Preskill and Kip Thorne, Tom Rosenbaum and Leonard Susskind. The evening also included two special video presentations featuring Bill Gates and words from Richard Feynman.
    Bongo drumming by Richard Feynman and Ralph Leighton.
    View all presentations: • Feynman 100 Evening Ce...
    Produced in association with Caltech Academic Media Technologies. ©2018 California Institute of Technology

КОМЕНТАРІ • 200

  • @NothingMaster
    @NothingMaster 4 роки тому +73

    Susskind himself is also a most brilliant expositor of physics. He is an insightful and groundbreaking physicist with exceptional abilities in communicating fundamental ideas, and making them effortlessly accessible (amazingly enough, often in rigorous ways) to people of all backgrounds.

  • @alimibrahem8120
    @alimibrahem8120 6 років тому +166

    All love and respect to Leonard susskind..💓

  • @jaydotclass7001
    @jaydotclass7001 2 роки тому +16

    Summary:
    - A close friend of Richard Feynman, even with their 22 year age difference, they seemed to have such similar personalities
    - Dick helped reaffirm Susskind's own Physical Intuition as a strength. He is now currently one of the trendsetters in the world
    of Physics, especially as a String Theorist.
    - Dick's Scientific Syle was incredibly simple and profound. In many cases it was so simple in fact that it perhaps humiliated
    his colleagues who believed the problems he was solving were supposed to be difficult - but he made it look so easy.
    - One similarity between them is that they both shared a big ego and sothey liked to to boast about themselves and Feynman
    in particular liked to boast about his tricks.
    - Dyson, Schwinger, Tomonaga , and Feynman laid the foundations of QFT
    - 3:40 Feynman's Diagrammatic Approach to QFT
    - 8:40 Fun Fact: Feynman's Diagrams were created when Susskind was 9
    - 9:00 Freeman Dyson's Contribution to QFT
    - 10:40 Feynman vs. Superfluidity: An Exercise of Physical Intuition
    - 17:30 Feynman vs. Particle Accelerators: A profound simplification of high energy physics
    - 21:10 Another Physicist...
    - 22:48 "Simplicity, Honesty, Grounded Thinking..."

  • @mixolydian2010
    @mixolydian2010 5 років тому +61

    Love Leonard he's a wonderful teacher too, all respect to him as well as Feynman

  • @peterkay7458
    @peterkay7458 5 років тому +56

    Susskind is such a joy to listen to lol

  • @Psnym
    @Psnym 4 роки тому +11

    UA-cam’s algos are broken. They just now showed me this video which, based on my already watching and upvoting hundreds (thousands?) of hours of Susskind and Feynman vids, should have been top of my feed the moment it was released.
    Thank you as always, Professor Susskind for the talk!

  • @piccolinainamore6010
    @piccolinainamore6010 6 років тому +32

    Two of my favourite people

  • @NothingMaster
    @NothingMaster 3 роки тому +10

    Not unlike Dyson and Feynman himself, Susskind, too, is a marvelous storyteller.

  • @gabrieljcs11
    @gabrieljcs11 6 років тому +116

    I'm watching this because of Feynman, which I deeply admire and respect (and the same goes to Leonard Susskind) -- but man, this title is weird... I'm sure Feynman would've loved it, though!

    • @Euquila
      @Euquila 6 років тому +6

      It's weird to you. To many, Dick is not associated to the penis but rather to the nickname of Richard.

    • @Rayquesto
      @Rayquesto 6 років тому +32

      0:30 "He touched me very very deeply".

    • @CandidDate
      @CandidDate 6 років тому +1

      The problem is how we are made to understand something...when you think of one single atom, you draw a damn circle and call it an "atom." The way we should think is that space is an ever expanding fractal, each particle closely related to its surroundings. I presume we will get this right as soon as we program our baby universe within the confines of (perhaps quantum) computer memory. Only then will we realize that Pong is the ultimate game. Some of us are stuck on Pac Man though and eat our way through life. We're all playing this game so don't worry, you can't break it. It is indestructible.

    • @u.v.s.5583
      @u.v.s.5583 5 років тому

      @@Euquila Or Moby the Whale.

    • @paromita_ghosh
      @paromita_ghosh Рік тому

      @@Rayquesto ?

  • @bestoutcomes
    @bestoutcomes 4 роки тому +10

    Superb! What a treat to listen in as if I was present. He's a very good presenter/speaker.

  • @DAMfoxygrampa
    @DAMfoxygrampa 4 роки тому +153

    I'm sorry, I thought this was a totally different video, I'll see myself out.

    • @petermatthiesen8288
      @petermatthiesen8288 4 роки тому +3

      hahahaha, I did not laugh like that for a long time.

    • @lasaromorell3642
      @lasaromorell3642 4 роки тому +20

      The title must’ve touched you really deeply

    • @The268170
      @The268170 4 роки тому +2

      @@lasaromorell3642 I see what you did there

    • @Zhoul-is-back
      @Zhoul-is-back 3 роки тому +1

      Same happened to me. Fixed by searching 'South Park c*ck magic'

    • @babulalmarandi1243
      @babulalmarandi1243 3 роки тому

      @@petermatthiesen8288 lol.....

  • @jagk4459
    @jagk4459 4 роки тому +6

    Thank you, Leonard Susskind, for this talk! =)

  • @jeanqnguyen4542
    @jeanqnguyen4542 6 років тому +13

    Like Susskind very much, my intuition will be just fine swinging left and right through this talk

  • @jk501111
    @jk501111 4 роки тому +8

    This came to me just last night before coming across the video: "It's with the action(s) that the boundaries appear." I only studied finance and some computer science on an "official" level.. I'm so so interested lately in physics and electromagnetism and see a lot of interrelation among the four (4) fields.

  • @marksw5499
    @marksw5499 5 років тому +10

    Both are great men and physicists.

  • @ManuTheGreat79
    @ManuTheGreat79 6 років тому +15

    Oh, Freeman Dyson gave a talk recently? I'm watching that next.

  • @migfed
    @migfed 6 років тому +18

    Great Lenny, great lecture about Feynman and the way he understood physics

  • @gustavgans9082
    @gustavgans9082 3 роки тому +5

    Didn't know Mike Ermantraut was friends with Feynman!

  • @blenderpanzi
    @blenderpanzi 5 років тому +43

    Dick used trick. It's extremely effective.

  • @512Airsoft
    @512Airsoft 2 роки тому +5

    This was *brilliant* and if physicists take the sentiments expressed here to heart, really put them into practice -- it'll do a lot to advance physics!

  • @qbitsday3438
    @qbitsday3438 6 років тому +40

    Leonard Susskind acts exactly like Richard Feynman during his lectures.

  • @elrichenrik3633
    @elrichenrik3633 Рік тому

    Thank you UA-cam for letting me know about this great men.

  • @professorboltzmann5709
    @professorboltzmann5709 5 років тому +7

    great lecture indeed

  • @stephenhicks826
    @stephenhicks826 6 років тому +8

    Wonderful talk, Thank-you

  • @Raphael_NYC
    @Raphael_NYC 6 років тому +4

    Thank you Dr. Susskind.

  • @daubabylon
    @daubabylon 2 роки тому +1

    Not only a great scientist but a even greater writer.

  • @Andreastheduck
    @Andreastheduck 6 років тому +75

    thought this was Mike from breaking bad in the thumbnail

    • @talina7048
      @talina7048 6 років тому +2

      I thought that guy from breaking bad was susskind for half a sec ;)

    • @NickleJ
      @NickleJ 6 років тому +1

      Now I cant unsee that...

    • @4TheRecord
      @4TheRecord 6 років тому +3

      "The lesson is, if you're gonna be a criminal, do your homework."

    • @sanderklaasen
      @sanderklaasen 4 роки тому +1

      Romanov cleaning Romance Romania Roman

    • @sanderklaasen
      @sanderklaasen 4 роки тому +1

      Ei?

  • @vincentanguoni8938
    @vincentanguoni8938 3 роки тому +5

    Here is a guy that I am pretty sure is a genius....
    Talking about another guy that is also a genius... Without any hint of envy... That's cool

  • @robertmolldius8643
    @robertmolldius8643 6 років тому +6

    Thanx Susskind!

  • @semidemiurge
    @semidemiurge 6 років тому +1

    Leo, thank you for that. He would have appreciated your generous spirit.

  • @naimulhaq9626
    @naimulhaq9626 3 роки тому +1

    At the end of Lenny's portrayal of Feynman, I thought he was talking about Maldacena, my hero.

  • @cccccuy
    @cccccuy 5 років тому +27

    Hmmm, I wonder why Gell Mann didn't come.

    • @pokeman123451
      @pokeman123451 4 роки тому +6

      if he had, we would have heard him quack when susskind said Parton

    • @nanigopalsaha2408
      @nanigopalsaha2408 4 роки тому

      @@pokeman123451 Don't you mean quark when Susskind said parton?

    • @pokeman123451
      @pokeman123451 4 роки тому +4

      Nani gopal Saha Don’t you mean Feynman’s Neurotic Anti-twin when you say Gell-man?
      jk lol both are brilliant

    • @nanigopalsaha2408
      @nanigopalsaha2408 4 роки тому

      @@pokeman123451 😁😃

    • @pokeman123451
      @pokeman123451 4 роки тому +1

      PikPobedy too many great physicists dying.. Gell-Man, Dyson, and others. RIP

  • @humanrightsadvocate
    @humanrightsadvocate 4 роки тому +2

    What a treat!

  • @CausticCreations
    @CausticCreations 3 роки тому +3

    12:40 - think about the phenomena directly and you will see it in your mind "The Feynman Legacy."

  • @mikeclarke952
    @mikeclarke952 6 років тому +22

    Fine man Feynman was. errm.

    • @meesalikeu
      @meesalikeu 6 років тому

      Mike kirock actually no. feyman cheated on his wives and used to bang his own undergrad students, which because of the one sided position of power he had over them (grades) would get you fired from colleges today. fine physicist tho.

    • @vikranttyagiRN
      @vikranttyagiRN 5 років тому +2

      @@meesalikeu fuck off douchebag

    • @marksw5499
      @marksw5499 5 років тому +3

      @@meesalikeu you're just jealous that you're not the bad ass pimp that he was.

    • @tokuchi7726
      @tokuchi7726 4 роки тому +1

      @@meesalikeu no,he did not cheat on his wives.

    • @pokeman123451
      @pokeman123451 4 роки тому

      meesalikeu as far as i know, the relationships he had with undergrads was right after los alamos, and years after his first wife had just died. he was in his twenties im pretty sure. he got some chick pregnant i think. he later did learn some non-PC methods of picking up women, but by modern day standards. he literally learned them from a pimp and a madam. kinda funny imo lol. idk. hard to judge a guy who grew up in a different society

  • @MilanStojanovic9
    @MilanStojanovic9 6 років тому +56

    the title made me expect something different

    • @u.v.s.5583
      @u.v.s.5583 5 років тому +8

      That's another secret lecture, called Dick's Prick.

    • @skakdosmer
      @skakdosmer 5 років тому +1

      The actor Richard Burton always resented it when someone called him Dick. Perhaps because he was a well known womaniser.
      When he was a guest on a Dick Cavett show (or should I say “Richard Cavett”?), Burton told of an incident when he was staying in Humphrey Bogart's home.
      The director John Huston came to visit, saw Burton and said “Hi, Dick”. Burton responded, “Don’t call me that! My name is Richard”.
      To which Huston replied, “Sure, Dick”.

    • @HarryNicNicholas
      @HarryNicNicholas 5 років тому +1

      ah! the internet eh.

    • @4TheRecord
      @4TheRecord 4 роки тому

      I was hoping Fanny would be up next, Fanny was just as smart as Dick.

  • @physicspoint3356
    @physicspoint3356 2 роки тому

    May God bless you sir

  • @dancooper8551
    @dancooper8551 Рік тому

    Absolutely love this video!

  • @JimmyGray
    @JimmyGray 5 років тому +11

    My favorite physics teacher:)

    • @coena9377
      @coena9377 4 роки тому +1

      Do you mean Feynman or Susskind? Both were / are great physics teachers.

  • @iancheung4801
    @iancheung4801 3 роки тому +1

    Came for the thumbnail, stayed for the plot

  • @Gilh
    @Gilh 3 роки тому +1

    Was expecting different content based on the title... Wasn't disappointed, though.

  • @professorboltzmann5709
    @professorboltzmann5709 2 роки тому

    Thanks professor susskind

  • @poiuyrvsdg2
    @poiuyrvsdg2 4 роки тому +2

    Good title

  • @SailingEast
    @SailingEast 3 роки тому

    Looks like the KISS Method is / was employed by these fellows ... Keep It Sweet & Simple (KISS) .... interesting to note the intersection of philosophy / curiosity / mathematical rigour / scientific rigour / and the fun of phenomena and discovery .... my sense is that Albert Einstein would appreciate these folks and their work.

  • @markbrodie2784
    @markbrodie2784 Місяць тому

    Man! I'm a PhD but Susskind-like Feynman- makes me feel dumb!

  • @Robinson8491
    @Robinson8491 2 роки тому

    Nice, thank you

  • @JeffreyGroves
    @JeffreyGroves 6 років тому +3

    Superb

  • @peterkay7458
    @peterkay7458 5 років тому +5

    the overly precious mathematics...RIP sir

  • @jeffreymartin8448
    @jeffreymartin8448 3 роки тому

    Hail Feynman !

  • @mohamedzakymohamedzanaty8289
    @mohamedzakymohamedzanaty8289 3 роки тому

    Si 5/11/2018 ...... Recorso sensa motivi per sempre a anni pooooooo

  • @margaretalberts9920
    @margaretalberts9920 5 років тому +10

    Dr Feynman could have an ego when someone is as good as Feynman how could he not know it he must have had a difficult time living with stupid people I adore Feynman!

    • @edwardjones2202
      @edwardjones2202 3 роки тому

      He worked at Caltech. He probably had very little contact with stupid people, day to day. Even the physicists would have been the best physicists

    • @kuzuthunder1964
      @kuzuthunder1964 5 місяців тому

      @@edwardjones2202He was fortunate to live in a period where social media and easy methods of communication does not exist.

  • @jmholthuysen
    @jmholthuysen 2 роки тому

    Brilliant

  • @MonkeyDLuffy-ib8nc
    @MonkeyDLuffy-ib8nc 5 років тому +2

    Susskind gives shoutout to Mumbo Jumbo

  • @sanderklaasen
    @sanderklaasen 4 роки тому +1

    100 fine

  • @harishravishankar
    @harishravishankar 2 роки тому

    unfortunately no caltech prof friends on facebook to share thoughts just managing .. will be nicee.

    • @harishravishankar
      @harishravishankar 2 роки тому

      Facebook might be differnet or was it a different prof network older time :)

    • @harishravishankar
      @harishravishankar 2 роки тому

      Having nice pizza after previous comments like a virtual presence in lecutre :)

  • @achildofgod9954
    @achildofgod9954 4 роки тому

    Indeed Unique

  • @dansearle1613
    @dansearle1613 5 років тому +6

    To use a modern emote/meme = POGGERS

  • @aununally4274
    @aununally4274 4 роки тому +2

    When U get as old as us U tend to bury a lot of your friends..

  • @naimulhaq9626
    @naimulhaq9626 5 років тому +1

    Physics-Mathematics-Philosophy, that was Feynman's way of thinking simply, according to Leonardo. It enabled Feynman to discover QFT, QC (quantum computing) and frictionless Helium, making Feynman unique and essential. The lesson we take away, is to think simple, for nature is simple.
    Just as phase transition transforms non-life matter into life and consciousness (due to self-organizing and self-simulating property of matter), similarly the quantum field self-simulates intelligent conscious 'observer' collapsing the field into fine tuned particles (matter), that in turn creates life with perfection and with probability ONE

  • @grass5697
    @grass5697 3 роки тому

    great video, but the title disturbs me at the beginning

  • @fope2010
    @fope2010 3 роки тому

    Freeman Dyson..the mage...the white wizard

  • @venkybabu8140
    @venkybabu8140 2 роки тому

    Frequency is a cord of seperation. What are anatomical structures. Energy of concentration for the seperate worlds. World coordinates are always assymetric. Symmetry we can see only on a different coordinates never on same coordinates. Because the definition of coordinates is asymptotic. Essentially if you think of dimensionality. Usually there is only one dimension and the change is viewed as higher dimensions. Zero dimension the connection points. Binary differential or integral as a way of rearrangement. What is normal zero one zero one. What is modulation zero zero one one. What is demodulation one one zero zero. What are functions. Assembly of continuum. What is rational zero one one zero. What is irrational one zero zero one. What is transcendental. Mix of one zero zero one to one zero zero one. You can never mix. Why you can't mix because you can never get a frequency of separation. Always a twelfth overtone is a higher dimension. The reason for seperation. Or gaps. Potholes are twelve cross twelve. Abyss twelve power twelve. The reason to hold.

  • @pranavk133
    @pranavk133 3 роки тому

    Imagine Feynman is sitting in the hall....

  • @chetandange9866
    @chetandange9866 4 роки тому

    Is there conflict in Between Relativity and Quantum Mechanics?Maybe experts can answer

    • @atilafernandes5053
      @atilafernandes5053 4 роки тому

      Just general relativity

    • @badmintongo4832
      @badmintongo4832 3 роки тому

      Incompatibility between GR and QM. Attempt at the quantisation of the gravitational field, as yet unsuccessful. Possibly a semiclassical theory of gravity or F(r) gravity.

  • @raulcavalcante9193
    @raulcavalcante9193 4 роки тому +1

    at first glance this is a very weird title

  • @SanDiegoElectricBikes
    @SanDiegoElectricBikes Рік тому

    I knew his brother David...

  • @MrLukeOpai
    @MrLukeOpai Рік тому

    It's easy to see he loves the 'D'

  • @mukuljha5216
    @mukuljha5216 3 роки тому

    I thought this was Mike from Breaking Bad😂

  • @SafeTrucking
    @SafeTrucking 4 роки тому

    Vale Lenny Susskind.

  • @hienable6933
    @hienable6933 Рік тому

    I thought Erhmantraut was giving a speech 💀

  • @dylerturden8018
    @dylerturden8018 Рік тому

    Mike.

  • @aloknathsingh4647
    @aloknathsingh4647 4 роки тому

    This was a good presentation, even though I came for something else.

  • @EstiagoGaming
    @EstiagoGaming 5 років тому

    From 4:34 the audience in the right are behaving a bit weird they are stuttering.i don't know if that's processing problem

  • @chianchen776
    @chianchen776 Рік тому

    Kid named finger

  • @ukaszsurzycki845
    @ukaszsurzycki845 6 років тому +1

    macro quantum efect in liquid hellium phenomenas

  • @escapefelicity2913
    @escapefelicity2913 3 роки тому

    Leonard,
    There are no degrees of unique
    "unique" means being the only one of its kind; unlike anything else

  • @eugenbarbula9661
    @eugenbarbula9661 5 років тому +2

    First comes the number theory, where one needs to learn what a number is at it's fundamental level. From there on, every other discipline of science is just some kind of mapping algorithm, all those different mathematical frameworks will have no value for one, when the number theory wasn't understood.

  • @dr.merlot1532
    @dr.merlot1532 Рік тому

    South Park episode

  • @martinzitter4551
    @martinzitter4551 6 років тому +1

    You can't be really unique, you are either unique or you're not unique. Unique means one-of-kind. All one-of-a-kinds are unique.

    • @eliotfintushel1258
      @eliotfintushel1258 5 років тому +1

      The use of the word "unique" is evolving. It used to mean what you say, but nowadays it's used in a wider sense even by savants, as you see in this video! Similarly, the words "as" and "like" used to be quite different, but now "like" is used everywhere that "as" used to be the only one of those two words that was permissible. (The New York Times acceded to this new usage a number of years ago--I remember the moment clearly!) I am very sorry to have lost the old meaning of "unique"--it was wonderfully precise, but sic transit gloria mundi, knowumsayin'?

    • @MissBettieS
      @MissBettieS 5 років тому +1

      I love what Feynman said about this. "People get all upset and say things like 'Johnny graduated from college and still can't spell the word friend'' Well, change the spelling of the word friend and focus on what Johnny is saying."
      What you said wasn't meaningful,, but if it had been, anyone who pointed out the two grammatical errors you made and ignored what you were saying would sound as pathetic as you do. In your comment "One of kind" is missing the "a' and "All one-of a -kinds..." is an incomplete sentence as it ends with a dangling participle.
      Oh, no, Susskind made a mistake (according this years language rules) there goes the neighborhood.
      I'm an English lit' major, the fundamental rule of English language is that common usage dictates correctness.
      Anyone who puts grammatical correctness (an arbitrary, living set of rules) above content is obtuse.
      You can suck at calculus and no one ever has to know but a person who doesn't easily grasp the technicalities of grammar can't hide it and assholes continually love to take shots at them. e.e Cummings didn't use proper grammar, neither does a lot of hip hop but it conveys more in a sentence than it ever would using the Queen's English.

    • @MissBettieS
      @MissBettieS 5 років тому +1

      @@eliotfintushel1258 Yes, language is a living thing, and I do admire beautiful writing and speaking but communication is the priority, the letters are just a clutzy translation, still people are often happy to ignore what you were saying just to tell you should have said "nauseated, not nauseous." It make me violent.

  • @Lunaayan
    @Lunaayan 2 роки тому

    hail richard feynman king of physics and my heart

  • @PDBO
    @PDBO 6 років тому +1

    Say "Dick" again.

  • @reimannx33
    @reimannx33 3 роки тому +2

    How many times is he going say "dick" in reference to Feynman ? Old man repeating ad infinitum.

  • @brian554xx
    @brian554xx 6 років тому

    Anyone else have trouble hearing "phenomena" without imagining some muppets singing "doot doooo doo doodoo"?

  • @ujwoldahal5400
    @ujwoldahal5400 Рік тому

    Watch from 10min 55sec to 11:05 😅😅😅😅😅😅 and thank me later.

  • @hansu7474
    @hansu7474 6 років тому

    Very difficult audience.

  • @paky0201
    @paky0201 4 роки тому

    Susskind leaves out Freeman Dyson on his QED authors. OUCH

  • @mandos9
    @mandos9 6 років тому +1

    he talks like mike from breaking bad

  • @yuraretz2379
    @yuraretz2379 2 роки тому

    Good old times when the word Dick didn’t mean, well, dick…

  • @EliotMcLellan
    @EliotMcLellan 5 років тому +1

    LAST TIME WAS A TED COMMENT DEVOTED TO DICK ... OKAY I HOPE THEY STOP TED CONFERENCES ALL TOGETHER SINCE HE JUST SHOULDN'T SEND IT NO WAY NO HOW NOT EVEN FUNNY JUST STOP

  • @badwolfgooddog7979
    @badwolfgooddog7979 5 років тому +1

    BELL!! Lenny always leaves out Bell and his eloquint inequality that spells out the most confusing aspect of quantum mechanics. Is Lenny hitting the "sauce" again? And again?

    • @atallguynh
      @atallguynh 5 років тому +1

      I've seen him mention Bell many times in his lectures. This was a talk about Feynman's approach, not the overall history of QM, QC, etc.

  • @kingyinyan254
    @kingyinyan254 3 роки тому

    I like his introductory books (Susskind's) but I thought he was just an amateur himself 😂

  • @RegularShow39
    @RegularShow39 5 років тому +1

    tittle is so weird xd

  • @kingjeremysircornwell7847
    @kingjeremysircornwell7847 5 років тому +1

    #Spam

  • @ninecatsmagee8384
    @ninecatsmagee8384 4 роки тому +2

    When i hear this guy talk about Feynman he always places such a focus on "ego" that is anomalous to my experience of the man and i wonder why he'd consider himself a "friend" and yet be so jealous of the man's incredible talent and brilliance as a teacher. Disturbing and i'd rather hear somebody else's version.

    • @chasebender7473
      @chasebender7473 4 роки тому +3

      His use of ego is not in a demeaning way. Although ego is often thought to be a negative trait, it is something that every person has and can be utilized to great effect. This is what I believe Susskind is saying: Feynman is as well known and revered as he is because he used his ego to fuel his passion. It made him charismatic and original.

    • @eamonreidy9534
      @eamonreidy9534 3 роки тому +2

      I suspect Feynman didn't have a hang up with the word like you. He probably loved to joke about it and was able to laugh at himself, unlike some.

  • @wongawonga1000
    @wongawonga1000 2 роки тому

    I fear feynman may have been a FIG-JAM kind of person.

    • @MDExplainsx86
      @MDExplainsx86 Рік тому +1

      Most people find that wrong! But in fact, it's natural and you'll understand it more clearly if you into Science or have related science background; Science is highly competitive and highly delicate field.

    • @wongawonga1000
      @wongawonga1000 Рік тому

      @@MDExplainsx86 My background is in physics.3:05 shows it to be correct.Feynman liked to tell you ho he solved a problem. He had psychological need to advertise his successes.A little Humility in such cases goes a long way!

    • @wongawonga1000
      @wongawonga1000 Рік тому

      @@MDExplainsx86 Do tell me why you think it is natural I have a Physics degree, None of my lecturers were lumbered with large egos that they had to keep inflated

  • @reimannx33
    @reimannx33 5 років тому +3

    Susskind is becoming more and more grouchy with age as mathematical physics of today left him in the dust a while ago.

  • @tokajileo5928
    @tokajileo5928 6 років тому +1

    he made one mistake, Helium is not a molecule, it is a noble gas and does not form molecule.

    • @hansu7474
      @hansu7474 6 років тому +2

      Nobody cares if he made a mistake in an informal presentation. Making mistake on stage happens all the time.

    • @mjja99
      @mjja99 6 років тому +8

      Not a mistake - in its liquid form helium has a molecular structure see :-academic.oup.com/ptp/article-pdf/6/4/458/5418370/6-4-458.pdf

    • @robj144
      @robj144 6 років тому +3

      Did you miss him say liquid Helium? Liquid Helium most definitely forms a molecule.

  • @MA-dh2bd
    @MA-dh2bd 4 роки тому

    Suskind is not a well organized lecturer. In fact he jumps across the board creating confusion. Very bad sketcher and illustrator

  • @broskikids3727
    @broskikids3727 Рік тому

    With all do respect.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................dick