Since I am back from NDE a year 2000 till now I couldn’t find amazing unconditional love, that I received in the White Light , not possible to find in this side, I am missing to be there, yes I changed completely, as a musician I became a powerful psychic too, reading the minds, seeing things in deep sleep before happening, sickness, accidents, earthquakes, war… communication with death people, which they are not dead, this became normal to me. Thank you so much for understanding us DR. Pim van Lommel.
Great talk, many thanks! It is always such a joy to listen to Pim van Lommel! I am deeply thankful for what he has done and continues to do to spread the message of the NDE in the world.
Consciousness is fundamental.the brain is a filter. its main function is to restrict consciousness down to the tiny little illusion of self and non self.
My friend..... Brains don't restrict, they are merely restric - ted, due to the frequencies they opporate on. The limits of human brains are predetermined by the environment that grows them.
people have womb and pre-birth memories, children remember past lives that have been corroborated and also children speaking of places before they came here. thousands upon thousands of accounts. I was one of them, according to my mom, i said a lot of things that i couldnt have known. I told her I was the baby she lost and I came back to be with her. My mom had a miscarriage before me that i didnt know of at 3-4 years old.
not to mention i was what one would call a conscious baby lol, i remember being an infant, constantly held and bundled up. some of them are the most vivid memories i’ve ever had.
Thanks for the support Zienelle, don't forget to share with anyone you feel could benefit from hearing Dr Van Lommel's idea's and thanks again for watching :)
Even Alexander III was an atheist who was a neurologist who was declared brain dead when in a coms. To him it made no sense, he was brain dead, yet he experienced that he was in primordial ooze then he heard music and saw light then a feeling of euphoria. The book is called Proof of Life. He said he went to heaven. Is unconscious the soul?
Glad you enjoyed it my friend, don't forget to share with anyone you feel could benefit from hearing Dr Van Lommel's idea's and thanks again for the support :)
I never understand why subjective evidence it not taken seriously in science. Dont doctors use subjective experience to help them form a diagnosis and barristers in a court of law use subjective experience to support a case so why not scientists?
Well not really. Physicians use techniques and medications that have undergone replicable trials, so there are in fact objective data to base diagnoses on. Legal systems, like the one we have in the U.S., are quite different, and based on precedent. Trials are a mixture of concrete objects, reconstructed events using forensics, and very subjective anecdotal "eyewitness accounts" when and where available. In addition, legal systems, again as we have in the U.S., are quite resistant to science and change.
"Emergentism" is a viable option, I think, for addressing the origin of "mind" and "consciousness". The problem is that it can only be provisional, amenable to being replaced by explicit accounts in terms of causal or probabilistic connections, if it is to be taken seriously. Otherwise, it is just a "replacement" mystery. There is a distinction between hard emergentism, and soft emergentism, or ontological and epistemological emergentism respectively. Epistemological" or "soft" emergentism is due to a lack of detailed knowledge of the causal ground of the phenomenon to be explained; ontological or "hard" emergentism is when the phenomenon in question simply cannot be explained by reducing it to component parts and causal connections: it resists explanation, and remains inexplicable. This is why ontological emergentism is so difficult to adopt for a scientist (I am a scientist, a doctor of evolutionary biology and anatomy, and a former medical researcher). The problem is when to recognize that the phenomenon in question truly isn't amenable detailed analysis, and when to just keep going until such an analysis is achieved.
When your heart stops, you will lose consciousness very quickly. There are people who are happy to contradict this medical fact. And there are many other people who are willing to pay them.
Since I am back from NDE a year 2000 till now I couldn’t find amazing unconditional love, that I received in the White Light , not possible to find in this side, I am missing to be there, yes I changed completely, as a musician I became a powerful psychic too, reading the minds, seeing things in deep sleep before happening, sickness, accidents, earthquakes, war… communication with death people, which they are not dead, this became normal to me. Thank you so much for understanding us DR. Pim van Lommel.
that is beautiful thank you for sharing.
Great talk, many thanks! It is always such a joy to listen to Pim van Lommel! I am deeply thankful for what he has done and continues to do to spread the message of the NDE in the world.
Thanks for listening
I hope so.
I don't fancy being alive without being able to walk.
We can only say that something can happen near death; but we can never know, while alive, what happens after death.😮
Sensible comment 👍
Mobil seçeneklerde Türkçe altyazı yok..
Lütfen ayarlayın
done
Consciousness is fundamental.the brain is a filter. its main function is to restrict consciousness down to the tiny little illusion of self and non self.
My friend.....
Brains don't restrict, they are merely restric - ted, due to the frequencies they opporate on.
The limits of human brains are predetermined by the environment that grows them.
Where does our consciousness come from when we are born if it's not generated by our own brains??
people have womb and pre-birth memories, children remember past lives that have been corroborated and also children speaking of places before they came here. thousands upon thousands of accounts. I was one of them, according to my mom, i said a lot of things that i couldnt have known. I told her I was the baby she lost and I came back to be with her. My mom had a miscarriage before me that i didnt know of at 3-4 years old.
not to mention i was what one would call a conscious baby lol, i remember being an infant, constantly held and bundled up. some of them are the most vivid memories i’ve ever had.
Thanks for the support Zienelle, don't forget to share with anyone you feel could benefit from hearing Dr Van Lommel's idea's and thanks again for watching :)
Even Alexander III was an atheist who was a neurologist who was declared brain dead when in a coms. To him it made no sense, he was brain dead, yet he experienced that he was in primordial ooze then he heard music and saw light then a feeling of euphoria. The book is called Proof of Life. He said he went to heaven. Is unconscious the soul?
Great video
Glad you enjoyed it my friend, don't forget to share with anyone you feel could benefit from hearing Dr Van Lommel's idea's and thanks again for the support :)
The end? Have you found the beginning?!?!
Dr Oliver Sacks
I never understand why subjective evidence it not taken seriously in science. Dont doctors use subjective experience to help them form a diagnosis and barristers in a court of law use subjective experience to support a case so why not scientists?
It probably falls into same category as perspective and point of view. Taken into consideration in a courtroom, sure, but not hard data
I think I really mean that subjective data is not valued in the same way as so called objective data.
Well not really. Physicians use techniques and medications that have undergone replicable trials, so there are in fact objective data to base diagnoses on. Legal systems, like the one we have in the U.S., are quite different, and based on precedent. Trials are a mixture of concrete objects, reconstructed events using forensics, and very subjective anecdotal "eyewitness accounts" when and where available. In addition, legal systems, again as we have in the U.S., are quite resistant to science and change.
I think you've missed the point entirely..
I would lkve to believe that conscoiusness is fundamental but I dont think it is. I think it simply emerges as a property of brain biology.
You haven't listened!
@@Gdad-20Yes I have.
"Emergentism" is a viable option, I think, for addressing the origin of "mind" and "consciousness". The problem is that it can only be provisional, amenable to being replaced by explicit accounts in terms of causal or probabilistic connections, if it is to be taken seriously. Otherwise, it is just a "replacement" mystery.
There is a distinction between hard emergentism, and soft emergentism, or ontological and epistemological emergentism respectively. Epistemological" or "soft" emergentism is due to a lack of detailed knowledge of the causal ground of the phenomenon to be explained; ontological or "hard" emergentism is when the phenomenon in question simply cannot be explained by reducing it to component parts and causal connections: it resists explanation, and remains inexplicable. This is why ontological emergentism is so difficult to adopt for a scientist (I am a scientist, a doctor of evolutionary biology and anatomy, and a former medical researcher). The problem is when to recognize that the phenomenon in question truly isn't amenable detailed analysis, and when to just keep going until such an analysis is achieved.
You are sooooo wrong :(
When your heart stops, you will lose consciousness very quickly.
There are people who are happy to contradict this medical fact.
And there are many other people who are willing to pay them.
ohh, you are definitely wrong :(
did u even listen? he is a cardiologist for christ sake lol!
The answer is no