2013 Toyota 4Runner vs 2014 4Runner Matchup 0-60 MPH Test & Review

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 сер 2024
  • ( www.TFLcar.com ) The 2014 Toyota 4Runner has been updated and refreshed with a new facia, interior and backend treatment. But does that mean it is faster than the 2013 model from 0-60 MPH. We decided to find out in another accurate, fun and informative and TFLcar review. Check it out as Roman drives and reviews both the 2013 and 2014 Toyota 4Runner from 0-60 MPH to see which model year is faster.
    Check us out on:
    Facebook: ( / tflcar )
    Twitter: ( / tflcar )
    and now even Truck Videos on UA-cam at:
    The Fast Lane Truck ( / tflcar )

КОМЕНТАРІ • 114

  • @SuperLexusman
    @SuperLexusman 5 років тому +14

    Next challenge: 4Runner vs Corvette vs McLaren 570s.

  • @Guntobond
    @Guntobond 9 років тому +61

    why do people base quality on speed, and not functionality and/or reliability. Does families with like 5 kids really go out racing every drive to the grocery store?

    • @EsenbekAliev_
      @EsenbekAliev_ 8 років тому +6

      +Acosta Vlogs you are right, but they also want a fast car, not fast like gtr but fast enough to take your kids, dog, luggage other shit you have and pass 18 wheelers safe! you know what I mean? not like 10 sec to speed up, but maybe 7? 3 seconds can save lives

    • @Thebluebimmer
      @Thebluebimmer 6 років тому +3

      My wife does and jumps every curb

    • @luckyamadin2277
      @luckyamadin2277 4 роки тому +1

      Yes you are right they will not go out racing but they need good machine for a long distance journey like me you need something that will get up and go something when you step on the gass it will answer by so doing the journey get exiting

  • @fuffthebucks7266
    @fuffthebucks7266 10 років тому +4

    my parents just bought a 2014 4unner sr5 premium and it totally kicks ass here in Colorado

  • @LangDu21
    @LangDu21 2 роки тому +2

    I’ve had a 2013 SR5 model since 40k miles and just passed 100k miles a couple weeks ago. All I have done was oil changes, I just did transmission fluid flushed and a new set of tires, ohh and a driver side signal bulb. These trucks are so reliable!!! Who cares about 0-60 😄

  • @nestorulloa7080
    @nestorulloa7080 9 років тому +29

    This is an SUV not a sport car ... your review really is pointless.

  • @--RSL--
    @--RSL-- 8 років тому +2

    hey bro.. car and driver said 8.9 seconds.. and the "eco mode" as you put it is just a reminder light to keep the foot light on the throttle, it does nothing else.

  • @J-W.-
    @J-W.- 10 років тому +22

    They really need a v8 with this

  • @pimpfoot
    @pimpfoot 8 років тому +1

    There is no "Sport" mode. The transmission "S" position is Sequential Mode. This allows for semi-manual up and down shifting by moving the shifter forward or rearward. "Selecting shift ranges using S mode restricts the upper limit of the possible gear ranges, controls engine braking forces, and prevents unnecessary upshifting"

  • @ppha7665
    @ppha7665 10 років тому +6

    The new facelift on the 2014+ models are so ugly! The 2010-2013 4Runners were better looking. Wish they offered a manual transmission too.

  • @PR_GTR
    @PR_GTR 3 роки тому +2

    2013 4runner 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥👊🏻👊🏻👊🏻👊🏻

  • @sk8terboi510
    @sk8terboi510 Рік тому +1

    Think Toyota really should’ve offered the 4.6 V8 in these as an option for those who’d want not only off-road capability, but also off the line power on public roads! I have a 2003 4Runner with the 4.7 V8, use the recommended 91 grade fuel and live at 4500ft elevation.. 0-60 in 7ish seconds. 297k on the clock also 😂

  • @MrArt128598
    @MrArt128598 10 років тому +2

    Why does it matter how fast it is 0-60? Are the owners going to floor it to get to 60 in everyday use? No

  • @eric1096
    @eric1096 10 років тому +4

    Not sure how you got such poor times. I've had a 2011 Trail edition and now have a 2013 Trail. I've unofficially timed both at just under 8 seconds. Which is more than adequate since I do actually off-road. I think the 2014 is uglier in the front. They did away with the blackout treatments on the Trail models and that actually helps the appearance of mine. A big flaw on all 4Runners for those that do off-road is the crappy rubber that come with. I upgraded to Nitto ATs on my latest vehicle and I have more confidence that I won't get stuck or get a flat when in the boonies. I love the reliability and durability of 4Runners over especially jeeps and I will continue to obtain 4Runners.

    • @Datsun7705
      @Datsun7705 5 років тому +1

      eric1096 he’s 1 mile above sea level and many NA engines lose 17% of their power that way

    • @hogman3543
      @hogman3543 2 місяці тому

      4Runner is there for people can't afford a Land Cruiser

  • @gustavitos1979
    @gustavitos1979 10 років тому +1

    I just traded in my SR5 2013 for a SR5 2014 premium package 4x4, I do like better the front end on the 2013, but many others new details on the 2014 make it much better than the 2013.

  • @strabo1
    @strabo1 10 років тому +16

    pointless "review"

  • @bestbryanusa
    @bestbryanusa 10 років тому +5

    This guys are beyond ignorant they just made a video of SUVS from 0-60 LOL common sense would be offroading testing, MPG, comfortability, tech, how it actually drives, interior etc......even though this is not a review, making just a video from 0-60 on a SUV its insane.

  • @A_guan
    @A_guan 10 років тому

    The Fast Lane Car Roman 2 questions 1 where do you get the music and 2 please make a video of the new highlander limited vs Durango citadel when you guys get

  • @MotoEdit
    @MotoEdit 10 років тому +1

    I am pretty sure the "ECO Mode" is just an indicator on the dash to help you keep your foot out of it. At least that's what it is in my 2011 4runner Trail (that I LOVE by the way) :D TUG OF WAR!!!! I'm really hoping the trail is in 4lo and locked for that...

  • @TheAbsoluteZ33RO
    @TheAbsoluteZ33RO 10 років тому +1

    I love this truck.

  • @JackDanielsCHS08
    @JackDanielsCHS08 10 років тому

    I can't wait to see you guys review the TRD pro

  • @Weatherby406
    @Weatherby406 5 років тому +1

    This motor really wakes up at about 30k miles. Iv found the same thing with allot of Toyota’s.

  • @cccouple914
    @cccouple914 4 роки тому +1

    Your results are 'wrong' - the 4Runner '10+ runs 0-60 in 7.9 from Toyota - Independent testing has shown down to 7.5 from very well respected organizations - the 'issue' here is your elevation - that plays a huge role - sea level vs over 5k up easily will account for that difference. However, for those that do not know that fact your test is very misleading.

  • @Operafiend22
    @Operafiend22 10 років тому

    Didn't they do this comparison before in an earlier video?

  • @ChristopherWalkenPUA
    @ChristopherWalkenPUA 10 років тому

    Waiting for these to hit 60mph reminded me of the subaru impreza 0-60 video. Pretty bad lol.
    Maybe you guys could get your hands on a lexus GX and compare its 0-60 since it's basically a 4runner with a V8 in it.

  • @ariabozorgi
    @ariabozorgi 10 років тому

    Hi Roman, can you please take the 2014 limited to your usual off-road course, I wanna know how it handles the trail. I am planing to buy an SUV soon but don't know what to pick, the 4runner limited or the Grand Cherokee Overland. Off-road capability + comfort/luxury matters to me. Thanks Pall

    • @RyanKather
      @RyanKather 10 років тому +3

      You're going to want the GC. The 4Runner, shares the Jeep's off-road aptitude, but it doesn't offer a V8 or diesel option, and its interior simply isn't as nice.

  • @MDKN22
    @MDKN22 10 років тому +1

    Even though a 5.7L tundra has 280 hp, it still has plenty of power

    • @mattbrown942
      @mattbrown942 Рік тому +1

      A 5.7 tundra has 381 hp. Think you’re referring to the 4.7

  • @richw1907
    @richw1907 5 років тому +2

    WOW, 10+ seconds??? my 3.5L AWD Highlander gets 7.5 seconds, OOO ya, im at 2000ft above sea level, seems silly to judge performance in a place over 5000ft above sea level, just saying

  • @yoleisyperez2338
    @yoleisyperez2338 10 років тому

    Are u gonna make a video of 2015 ford expedion

  • @Antares_451
    @Antares_451 7 років тому

    Yeah. I have a 96 4runner limited (V6 3.4L). Purchased back in 2008 w/64k, she now has 156k an i'm the 2nd owner probable wont get rid of it. I also have a 2004 v8 limited w/xreas (145k) probable wont get rid of this one also because they don't make 4runners or tacoma's with a V8.

  • @danialkhan8012
    @danialkhan8012 4 роки тому +1

    Needs the tundra V8

  • @alherossad6243
    @alherossad6243 2 роки тому

    Commander la 4Runner 2013 jusqu'au Mali et à quel prix?

  • @thecedars0612
    @thecedars0612 10 років тому

    I like the old better but I like the hid bulbs on the new one

  • @WEIMYBIMMER
    @WEIMYBIMMER 10 років тому

    I have a 2006 v8 4runner with 265 hp and 320 of torque faster than 10 seconds to 60 even in that altititude and great mpg ..why is that because of weight....maybe you should try doing this comparison, and how can an older model perform better!!

  • @fredbrackely
    @fredbrackely 8 років тому

    Blimey, my old 05 pathfinder does 0-60 in 7.7 with 157000 on the clock. I wonder what the 4runner would do at sea level.

  • @franciscovlzqz17
    @franciscovlzqz17 10 років тому

    PLEASE do this with the 13 + 14 Corolla.

  • @MDKN22
    @MDKN22 10 років тому

    Sounds nice

  • @alphamarktenkamara5252
    @alphamarktenkamara5252 4 роки тому

    I love the 2014 4runner

  • @579093
    @579093 10 років тому

    The 2014 looks better in person. The video doesn't do it justice.

  • @marinramirez
    @marinramirez 7 років тому +4

    he is lying i have one is 2013 it's not that slow it does 7.7 even it is written in the manual book it start slow but picks up fast when you push on the gas pedal my 4runner is in my garage i take care of it it's my baby i keeps it's value it only has 30,000 miles it's worth 38,000

  • @cetlaa007
    @cetlaa007 10 років тому

    Hi Roman , i think the 2014 model is heavier. am i correct?

    • @alherossad6243
      @alherossad6243 2 роки тому

      Je veux commander la 4Runner 2014. Jusqu'au Mali .
      A quel prix?

  • @hogman3543
    @hogman3543 2 місяці тому

    4Runner is there for people can't afford a Land Cruiser

  • @fliboi1379
    @fliboi1379 9 років тому +3

    I like your vids, but really whats the point in 0-60 @ 1 mile above sea level??? All cars lack power in thinner air. 95% of us live well below mile high. It seems as if you bash all autos when you make this particular 0-60 test.. I don't get it!! So Misleading!!

  • @spookybear69changeingnamet6
    @spookybear69changeingnamet6 9 років тому

    Ima Venza lover

  • @regmatt
    @regmatt 7 років тому

    Can u do a comparison between 2017 4 runner limited vs Toyota Highlander limited ,to see which is good for family and overall realibility?

  • @MDKN22
    @MDKN22 10 років тому

    Yay toyotas got a touchscreen

  • @karoman87
    @karoman87 7 років тому

    как долго Вы живете в США ?

  • @BluePatch-pc7sx
    @BluePatch-pc7sx 8 років тому

    The extra mass of third row perhaps

  • @Dankcatvacs
    @Dankcatvacs 10 років тому

    should have done the 84 vs 94 vs 14 then we could see a diffference

  • @shiftymg3590
    @shiftymg3590 5 років тому

    A lot of bashing of the 0-60 test, but try squeezing onto a busy highway from a ramp where people are all going 70+ mph, and a loser next to you won't give you a chance to get in, you sure as hell won't beat him to get in in front of him. Try waiting in a red traffic light, and see in your rear view mirror, a car charging right into your rear end full speed because he or she is not paying attention to the road, but your only chance is to floor the pedal to steer out of the way to avoid yourself getting hit. If your car is slow, good luck on getting out of the way quickly.

  • @moneymike422vids
    @moneymike422vids 10 років тому

    I dont under stand why arent suvs on the fast lane truck? U said ur self u called it a truck

  • @baderalsaeed312
    @baderalsaeed312 9 років тому

    Nice

  • @pracopraco7675
    @pracopraco7675 7 років тому

    if u are intelginet, just buy the front(headlamps,grill,bumper,maybe the hood and fenders of the 2016, and replace it with the 2009 front simple. i just change the front , and the rear tailight also, of my 2009 landcruiser with the 2016..and paint it again

  • @MeguVusion
    @MeguVusion 10 років тому

    Am I the only one that on the 2014, the Toyota logo on the front looks a little awkward in the middle?? I like the logo on the 2013 model how it's on the crossbar. Just my preference.

  • @201111andre
    @201111andre 10 років тому

    TFLC really must do something with the sound quality, its horrible, when I watched a video before TFLC, the sound is so clean but the minute I play any TFLC video, I cant stand it, its noisy, loud, not very good quality

  • @Dylan6611
    @Dylan6611 10 років тому +3

    Weeeeak towing rating.

  • @5stardave
    @5stardave 6 років тому +1

    I miss Andre only speaking Russian

  • @iceage287
    @iceage287 10 років тому

    this car cannot tow a boat?

  • @kirbyswarp
    @kirbyswarp 10 років тому +2

    And I thought the old one couldn't be uglier....

    • @kirbyswarp
      @kirbyswarp 10 років тому +8

      ***** Liked your own comment again, you sad piece of shit.

    • @boberson33
      @boberson33 10 років тому +1

      kirbyswarp Oh come on at least it's not a minivan like all new suvs are

  • @680ecks
    @680ecks 10 років тому

    47000 for a station wagon I never though I would see the day. Big price increase for what looks to be the same car.1990 technology engine trans chassis.

    • @EndlesSuffering
      @EndlesSuffering 4 роки тому +1

      Station wagon? That’s the jeeps and durangos

  • @jseb2847
    @jseb2847 3 роки тому

    Why don’t ya go test drive a Mack truck
    Weducklyuss
    Why I’m here

  • @arielcontreras7683
    @arielcontreras7683 10 років тому +2

    My 2006 4runner hits 60 in 6-7 seconds ._.

    • @buildmorefarms1007
      @buildmorefarms1007 10 років тому

      Do a video of it doing 0-60!

    • @arielcontreras7683
      @arielcontreras7683 10 років тому +1

      Just look one up. I have the sport edition bty ._.

    • @buildmorefarms1007
      @buildmorefarms1007 10 років тому

      Never seen any 4 runner do 0-60 in under 7 seconds....cant seem to find anything that proves that one.

    • @arielcontreras7683
      @arielcontreras7683 10 років тому

      Search "2006 4runner 0-60" .. I saw one that does it in 5 seconds.

    • @timjones1863
      @timjones1863 10 років тому

      So does mine, wow.

  • @mountainbikeing45
    @mountainbikeing45 10 років тому +1

    "All the beans"

  • @Olph1
    @Olph1 10 років тому +1

    Pointless. Take them off-road next time.

  • @Ruxpinx
    @Ruxpinx 10 років тому

    The re-appearance of the RUSSIAN

  • @pontiachotshot
    @pontiachotshot 10 років тому

    only tows 5 K that's weak sauce

  • @fulloption86
    @fulloption86 10 років тому +2

    stupid review. take it off road.

  • @mhsvz6735
    @mhsvz6735 6 років тому +1

    Man, what a dog! As in slow!

  • @jeepluv76
    @jeepluv76 10 років тому

    This is slow, my 98 Ford Explore is faster with less power. The 4.0 in this 4Runner sounds good but has no go, I blame the transmission more than the engine.

    • @jeepluv76
      @jeepluv76 10 років тому

      Regardless of weight and altitude. There is an 16 year old engineering difference between the two vehicles. Plus The 4Runner has more power and the same amount of gears. The transmission is not efficient.

    • @user-ge3xb5ud6l
      @user-ge3xb5ud6l 10 років тому

      *****

  • @MartinezFAMHawaii
    @MartinezFAMHawaii 10 років тому

    Yeah 2014 headlights are more aggresive but 2013 lights are brighter at night.

    • @BDoOC99
      @BDoOC99 9 років тому

      No. Projector beam headlights are designed to project more light onto the road then regular reflector headlights. Plus they're both halogen so one isn't really bright than the other.

    • @MartinezFAMHawaii
      @MartinezFAMHawaii 4 роки тому

      Its true, I own a 2013 for some reason headlights are brighter than those projectors yellowish color.

  • @victoroliveira3256
    @victoroliveira3256 6 років тому

    These vids are when Andre couldn't talk English................

  • @KickoStocks
    @KickoStocks 9 років тому +1

    Slower than shit

  • @mario1569490
    @mario1569490 10 років тому

    chevy tahoe way more faster and bigger

    • @lucasalamo7888
      @lucasalamo7888 10 років тому

      And expensive... don't forget expensive.

    • @mario1569490
      @mario1569490 10 років тому

      I would expect something better from toyota

    • @lucasalamo7888
      @lucasalamo7888 10 років тому

      Well you should say the same about Chevy since the Tahoe is obscenely expensive and yet in three years you lose over 40% of it's value . I would rather have a 4Runner over a Tahoe any day even though I have mayor gripes about it like it's crap-tacular sound system and it's third row seat which is a joke in my view. There are quite a few things that I like the new Tahoe (a new third row seat is one of them) but let's be realistic, there are other vehicles that can do a better job than a Tahoe.

  • @mtwilliams2
    @mtwilliams2 9 років тому +2

    Man this guy is a clown.

  • @overkonark
    @overkonark 10 років тому +1

    hahah ford fiesta its faster

    • @EndlesSuffering
      @EndlesSuffering 4 роки тому

      That’s like saying a corolla is faster than a Chevy tahoe

  • @Paul-rz3fd
    @Paul-rz3fd 9 років тому +1

    this is pointless your right this not GT-R or a race car wtf..

  • @daimyoshugo2821
    @daimyoshugo2821 4 роки тому

    Dumb review to much time waste

    • @dillonh321
      @dillonh321 Рік тому

      *too
      Your the dumb one. You can’t even spell.