Brilliant! More people need to hear the Truth...and they won't hear it in their local N.O. parishes or even in many so-called 'Traditional' parishes these days. Thank God for Bp. Sanborn who tells it as it is.
Saint Pius X --=pray for us in these troubles times we are going through .Saint Michael the Archangel protect us;. CHRISTUS VINCIT CHRISTUS REGNAT CHRISTUS IMPERAT !!!!
Bishop Sanborn is a terrific Bishop himself, clear, concise and down to earth. Saint Pius the X is a true saint who gave it all for the catholic church. I hope someday, we get to see a new Saint Pius the X! Glory be to the Father, the Son and the Holly Ghost!
@@TheProcinctu it also means if Pius X was the last pope, then that means they think that archbishop lefebvre and literally every single priest ordained after pius x's death is not valid
I read somewhere,or heard that Pius12 was being poisoned and was ill,they said that he could have signed something that he was not aware of. Thank you Bishop Sanborn
I would not be surprised... supposedly his physician said that this man had a strong heart...he could had lived for another twenty years! Also, two if not three cardinals (conservative) where also poisoned after his death...
Thanks brother, we need an new order,,, the knites of St pius x maybe..?devoted to studying the encyclicals and counsels that condemn vatican 2 and novos ordo
With Pope Pius Xll surrounded by freemasons and the recent use and threat of atomic bombs I wouldn't say to much about the did or not do.See also what went on with Gregory XVll (SIRI)
By all means pray to St Pius X for restoration. However, I fear that Bishop Sanborn proves too much, for under his premise St Pius X gave us Della Chiesa, who gave us Pacelli, who gave us Vatican II; thus "St Pius X gave us Vatican II." Do we really want to assert this kind of causality?
Tell me, there were about a third of Bishops who were Catholic. Why didn't they scream bloody murder, together? Instead, almoall signed these documents from hell.
He knows how to recognize a pope when there is one....He knows that a true pope under the influence of the Holy Ghost would never have promulgated such destruction like John XXIII, Paul the Sick, Wojtila, Ratzinger and Bergoglio did and does....
I've heard recently that when they opened the coffin of John XXIII, that his body was incorrupt as witnessed by a cardinal who was there. Have any of you heard this?
That is no excuse to leave the church just because you don't like what it says in a council. A council does not have to be infallible to be a valid council. There were many questionable councils. Yes, the church is turning liberal. Yes, there is scandal. But that is no excuse to schism. The church always had problems because of the fallible humans.
Thank you for your reply. I agree 100% that there is never an excuse to leave the Catholic Church. However, if "the Church" is turning liberal, then it cannot be the Church; God is immutable. Can the Holy Ghost, through the Catholic Church, teach one doctrine in one century, and then a conflicting teaching in the another?
@@ponderthem917 what conflicting teaching is there? Vatican ii teaches that there is no salvation out side of the catholic church, just like the previous councils said. Vatican ii also says that salvation may be possible for the people who do not know about the Catholic church. Previous popes before Vatican ii agreed with this aspect as well. Please name some things in Vatican ii that contradict previous teachings. Also, you say that the modern catholic church cannot be the church because it is turning liberal. Well I could say something similar to you: the traditional catholic church wouldn't be the church without a pope. (oooo this could get spicy xD)
@@rody3199 Thanks for your response. (I loved your "spicy" comment :D Haha) That is interesting that you say Vatican II teaches that there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church. Feel free to check out this short video which outlines one of the biggest issues with Vatican II if you get the chance: ua-cam.com/video/8iXpDTKDL4U/v-deo.html
@@rody3199 Also, the Catholic Church has been without a pope every single time a pope died and before a new one was elected; doesn't make the Church a different religion or cease to be the Catholic Church.
@@ponderthem917 Yes that is true, but no pope for 50 years seems a bit extreme. Even no cardinals also. No governing body. Seems a little unsettling that this would happen to the Catholic Church. Every pope after Vatican 2 was validly elected also. Also, I will watch the video you sent me. And, Sedevacantism breaks the Dogma defined at Vatican I by running a Monastery with no Governance from Rome: First Vatican Council, Session 4, Chapter 3: On the power and character of the primacy of the Roman Pontiff, Part 2 “Wherefore we teach and declare that, by divine ordinance, the Roman Church possesses a *pre-eminence of ordinary power over every other Church*, and that this jurisdictional power of the Roman Pontiff is both *episcopal and immediate*. Both clergy and faithful, of whatever rite and dignity, both singly and collectively, are bound to submit to this power by the duty of *hierarchical subordination* and true obedience, and this not only in matters concerning faith and morals, but also in those which regard the *discipline and government* of the Church throughout the world.”
We need another Pope like St. Pius the X.
it is coming.... He is called the Holy Prelate PROMISED by our Mother.
Where did she promise this and when? Thanks in advance
Pray for us Pope St. Pius X!!!! Help us with the Modernists in our time, in the Church; true enemies of Christ.
Thank you Bishop Sanborn, you are a great Bishop , always speaking the TRUTH
Bishop Sanborn is a very special bishop one of the best if not the best of our times!
Pray for us Pope Pius 🙏 the 10th.. thank you Bishop Sanborn for all you do !! Your time and teaching is timeless !! ✨ You are God's faithful Son...
Brilliant!
More people need to hear the Truth...and they won't hear it in their local N.O. parishes or even in many so-called 'Traditional' parishes these days.
Thank God for Bp. Sanborn who tells it as it is.
Absolutely correct, Aussie Rossie! For the person who wants to find it, the truth is there to be found through Bp. Sanborn and other clerics like him.
I cannot stop hearing this portion of this sermon. Saint Pius the x pray for us!
Thanks for this, pius x fills me with faith, I live in Glasgow so, ther isn't many Latin masses, we need more men with the same spirit as pius x
What a great sermon!
I actually saw Pope Pius XII in St Peter's on Easter Sunday, with my school, in 1956. The last pope of the Counter Reformation.
I hope His Holiness Pius XII is in the presence of our Lord.
Bravo! Absolutely beautiful!
Saint Pius X --=pray for us in these troubles times we are going through .Saint Michael the Archangel protect us;. CHRISTUS VINCIT CHRISTUS REGNAT CHRISTUS IMPERAT !!!!
Thank you so much for making this! It's fabulous and very effective.
You are welcome. Thank you for the comment; I'm glad it's effective. Bishop Sanborn is an excellent preacher!
Bishop Sanborn is a terrific Bishop himself, clear, concise and down to earth. Saint Pius the X is a true saint who gave it all for the catholic church. I hope someday, we get to see a new Saint Pius the X! Glory be to the Father, the Son and the Holly Ghost!
I grew up under Pius XII and thought he was traditional...fast forward 7 decades and I believe St PiusX was the last Catholic Pope.
Do you not see the dichotomy? If you adhere to your baseless belief that Pius XII was not a pope, then you can't name Pius X a saint.
@@TheProcinctu it also means if Pius X was the last pope, then that means they think that archbishop lefebvre and literally every single priest ordained after pius x's death is not valid
Deo gratias.
I read somewhere,or heard that Pius12 was being poisoned and was ill,they said that he could have signed something that he was not aware of. Thank you Bishop Sanborn
I would not be surprised... supposedly his physician said that this man had a strong heart...he could had lived for another twenty years! Also, two if not three cardinals (conservative) where also poisoned after his death...
He was surrounded by enemies of Holy Mother Church. Pope Pius XI might have been killed on orders of Mussolini
Be like Pius X and king David 🏴🇻🇦
SU QUEL TRONO,si nota subito che c'è un RE, sapendo benissimo quello che doveva fare,PRIMA Obbedire a DIO e poi ai vari cesare, GRAZIE,,,
Pray for us, St. Pius X, My Ex-Owner, protect me including Bella
I was so stirred , I felt like a malted milk.
Hence the SSPX!
❤❤❤
Thanks brother, we need an new order,,, the knites of St pius x maybe..?devoted to studying the encyclicals and counsels that condemn vatican 2 and novos ordo
With Pope Pius Xll surrounded by freemasons and the recent use and threat of atomic bombs I wouldn't say to much about the did or not do.See also what went on with Gregory XVll (SIRI)
A brave man goes to w@r then if needed. PERIOD! and yes "muh muh family above everything" is evil and pagan
Feel free to leave a comment. Feedback is appreciated.
When our blessed Mother said the holy father will have too much to suffer, we think she is referring to PXII for NOT CONSECRATING RUSSIA.
What do you mean?
God bless Catholic clergy.
In this age, those who reject Francis as Catholic and pope.
A😊😊
What’s with the background music? Why imply that the material isn’t strong enough to stand on its own?
What is the music ? It seems more than background noise... pius xii can never be a canonized saint because of his failings
But the heretics so called popes after Vatican 2 are canonized saints in very very short time eh? I am not saying Pope Pius Xll should be canonized.
By all means pray to St Pius X for restoration. However, I fear that Bishop Sanborn proves too much, for under his premise St Pius X gave us Della Chiesa, who gave us Pacelli, who gave us Vatican II; thus "St Pius X gave us Vatican II." Do we really want to assert this kind of causality?
Well, bishop Sanborn is brilliant to explain his point of view, but Pope Pius XII. was the last true pope and these accusations are ridicolous.
Nicolaus Hess explain, please.
How is it ridiculous?
@@loganross1861 A pope is free to decide some changes of liturgy, he did not change the doctrina.
It was a mere description of the weaknesses of a true Pope. Not uncharitable accusations.
Please remove the music, it is a distraction from listening to this powerful sermon.
The link is provided to the full sermon without the music in the description.
Tell me, there were about a third of Bishops who were Catholic. Why didn't they scream bloody murder, together?
Instead, almoall signed these documents from hell.
ya no sabe uno ni que onda !
Thank you. What the world needs is more nitpicking and finger pointing. It's very Christlike.
Sanborn was born in 1950. Ho doesn't recognize the popes since 1965. Traditionalist, he's out of the catholic church.
It’s correct not to recognise the heads of the false religion of Vatican II. Not doing so puts you outside the Church.
He knows how to recognize a pope when there is one....He knows that a true pope under the influence of the Holy Ghost would never have promulgated such destruction like John XXIII, Paul the Sick, Wojtila, Ratzinger and Bergoglio did and does....
@@giseleademers Also you are out of the catholic church.
@@edoardozamarra7515 I am out of the Novus Ordo sect...
I've heard recently that when they opened the coffin of John XXIII, that his body was incorrupt as witnessed by a cardinal who was there. Have any of you heard this?
That is no excuse to leave the church just because you don't like what it says in a council. A council does not have to be infallible to be a valid council. There were many questionable councils. Yes, the church is turning liberal. Yes, there is scandal. But that is no excuse to schism. The church always had problems because of the fallible humans.
Thank you for your reply. I agree 100% that there is never an excuse to leave the Catholic Church. However, if "the Church" is turning liberal, then it cannot be the Church; God is immutable. Can the Holy Ghost, through the Catholic Church, teach one doctrine in one century, and then a conflicting teaching in the another?
@@ponderthem917 what conflicting teaching is there? Vatican ii teaches that there is no salvation out side of the catholic church, just like the previous councils said. Vatican ii also says that salvation may be possible for the people who do not know about the Catholic church. Previous popes before Vatican ii agreed with this aspect as well. Please name some things in Vatican ii that contradict previous teachings. Also, you say that the modern catholic church cannot be the church because it is turning liberal. Well I could say something similar to you: the traditional catholic church wouldn't be the church without a pope. (oooo this could get spicy xD)
@@rody3199 Thanks for your response. (I loved your "spicy" comment :D Haha) That is interesting that you say Vatican II teaches that there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church. Feel free to check out this short video which outlines one of the biggest issues with Vatican II if you get the chance: ua-cam.com/video/8iXpDTKDL4U/v-deo.html
@@rody3199 Also, the Catholic Church has been without a pope every single time a pope died and before a new one was elected; doesn't make the Church a different religion or cease to be the Catholic Church.
@@ponderthem917 Yes that is true, but no pope for 50 years seems a bit extreme. Even no cardinals also. No governing body. Seems a little unsettling that this would happen to the Catholic Church. Every pope after Vatican 2 was validly elected also. Also, I will watch the video you sent me.
And,
Sedevacantism breaks the Dogma defined at Vatican I by running a Monastery with no Governance from Rome:
First Vatican Council, Session 4, Chapter 3: On the power and character of the primacy of the Roman Pontiff, Part 2
“Wherefore we teach and declare that, by divine ordinance, the Roman Church possesses a *pre-eminence of ordinary power over every other Church*, and that this jurisdictional power of the Roman Pontiff is both *episcopal and immediate*. Both clergy and faithful, of whatever rite and dignity, both singly and collectively, are bound to submit to this power by the duty of *hierarchical subordination* and true obedience, and this not only in matters concerning faith and morals, but also in those which regard the *discipline and government* of the Church throughout the world.”