How the Oval forfeit changed cricket (10/25)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 5 жов 2024
- In 2006, during the fourth day of the fourth Test between England and Pakistan at The Oval, umpires Darrell Hair and Billy Doctrove ruled that the Pakistani team had been involved in ball tampering. The Pakistani players refused to take the field after the tea break in protest at the decision. After waiting two more minutes the umpires removed the bails and declared England winners by forfeiture. This was the first such end to a Test match in over 1000 Tests.
Stay tuned for daily cricket updates :D
Subscribe to ESPNcricinfo: bit.ly/1jnGh6S
Get our apps:
Android: bit.ly/2vFVfzX
iOS: apple.co/2vGj8rg
Website: www.espncricinf...
You can also find us at:
/ cricinfo
/ espncricinfo
/ espncricinfo - Спорт
I am waiting for next video for quite a while....Please upload next episode.
Glad you asked! We are coming with a brand new episode TODAY 6 PM 🌟
@gemma harden Your saying that to ESPNCRICINFO ONE OF THE OFFICAL CRICKET CHANNELS DO YOUR RESEARCH
@gemma harden Uh wtf do you mean I dont work for espncricketinfo im 10 years old and the idiot is you
@gemma harden No u
@@espncricinfo hey
I'm Indian and I think Pakistan were done unfairly here. You can't punish a team without any proof. Inzimam did a good thing by not playing because losing your integrity is far worse than losing a match as we found out in Cape Town with Australia and SA.
Liton Das is still batting.
I will never understand these allegations. ever.
lets just learn to be sporty, its the firststep to building a team...
Jeewan Ramsamooj stop creating enmity between people you freakin RAW troll!!!!
Jeewan Ramsamooj 43 @ll out😆😆😆
@@darkwing780 nope...You are just dum enough to be cheated!!
After retiring from umpiring, on 23 October 2017, Hair pleaded guilty to one charge of embezzlement and one charge of stealing in the Orange Local Court. The offences were committed as a result of a gambling addiction, with Hair stealing a total of $9005.75 (AUD)
LOL I just posted this and then read your comment!!!
Pakistan were screwed over!!! Just irritates me that Daryll Hare was at the centre of it. He was the worst umpire! He swung matches with his inconsistent calls and this has to go down as one of the biggest swingers of matches! Wouldn't be surprised if one it comes out that he was betting on the outcomes of certain matches!!!!
@@dracks777 agree first umpire ever who did match fixing and possibly who knows he won millions
After icc kicked out Daryl hair now he runs his own pimp house in Thailand with shemales 😂😂😂
He also called Murali for no bowling. Look how Murali retired and how this racist loser failed in life.
Faisal Romshoo lol good share mate 😂
I still remember this match ...it was umpire's ass hole decision...even in india every one supported inzamam ...it shows hair's ego and attrocity
daryl hair* not harper
@@romirray5093 Harper was nothing different though
Respect for you Bro...
Same here. I’m from Pakistan and I felt so bad and angry when an Australian umpire asked Ashish Nehra to be quite when he was appealing for a plumb LBW.
Darkest day in the Cricket history. Darrell Hair will be remembered as one of most notorious umpire in the history of Cricket.
Pakistan have been wrongly blamed here....Inzamam is one of those few highly respectable cricketers from Pakistan. And even the penalty on him was not acceptable. And who the hell is MCC to not accept the decision made by the ICC...!!
Sadly because MCC make the rules not ICC
@@dipankardhar1272 the ball was not tampered lmfao
@@shivanandaroy3594 The rules are made by the constitution, yet a judge gives the verdict. I hope I have answered you
@@MuhammadAhmed-qh7ut But he was. They had to change the rules so he could keep playing.
I agree that there is not enough evidence to suggest ball tampering, but that didn't mean Pakistan had to throw the toys out of the Pram. The rules are that if they did not play, the match is forefit and the other team win. Which is what happened.
The important point should in fact be who are the ICC to change the result of a game!!!!
This gives dangerous precedent for them to chnage the result of any game as they see fit. This is what the MCC are against. In fact Michael Holding was so disgusted by this he resigned from his position in the ICC.
I'm an Australian and I'm ashamed at the various antics of umpire Darrell Hair. He needlessly provoked a controversy with this incident and again when he no-balled Muttiah Muralitharan in 1995.
I am so delighted to see comments from my Indian Brothers in favor of Pakistan team. Thank you guys!! 🙏🏻
Because without evidence no one is guilty
Truth above nationality
@@shubhamhatekar8813 nice some Indians should learn from you
@@aarushshrivastava2822 nice some Indians should learn from you
Pakistan team should be punished and banned from cricket
If this was England or Australia refusing to walk out, they’d be lauded as heroes
If it was England or Australia, they wouldn't have been accused/penalized to begin with
No one disagrees that Pakistan were unfairly blamed for tampering and this is coming from an England fan. Stop trying to start an argument based on a false equivalence that is pure guesswork to begin with.
Agreed.
Shut the fuck up. No they wouldn't have.
@@davidsmith9132 Be quiet. If that was true then how come Smith, Warner and Bancroft got banned for 9 to 12 months but when Asian players did the same thing they at most received a match penalty and a 3 game ban.
Darrell Hair threatened to sue ICC and PCB for racial discrimination 😂😂😂 that made me laugh
White guy threatening racial discrimination 😂😂
@@supunghz well there can be racism against a white person but surely not in this situation.
A white guy complaining about racial discrimination. Haha
Exactly
@@RayyanAshraf no such thing as white racism
All Indian just by seeing your comment believe me love you guys more love from Pakistan ..
Love
Hair is a jerk, he shud have been fired long ago
Inzy bhai has more fans in india than Pakistan
That was clear injustice done to the Pakistan cricket team
I remember watching that match live. Actually Hair gave multiple baised decisions against Pak even before that tampering accusation. We had enough. I was so proud of Inzi that day
And the batters got to pick the replacement ball whereas recently the bowlers got to pick the replacement ball.
In both case the English got to pick.
The English also got to examine the old ball so you can only guess where the tampering accusation came from.
As an Indian, I'm proud of the Pakistani team standing their ground
Really glad to see our Indian guys also admiring Pakistan act. Yes my Indian friends, such friendly behaviour from both our sides leads us to the prosperity. Love from Pakistan
For those that think this match was a one off, it is different than those of us that had seen years of Daryl Hair making bad decisions against the Pakistan team. The team had asked ICC to stop Hair from umpiring in their matches. Not only did he make bad decisions, he was very regularly rude and sharp with the pakistand players while smiling with the opposition. Us fans would see who was umpiring and consider it a handicap. The team sheet mattered less than who was umpiring during these days. The reason the team reacted the way they did was pent up resentment over years of Hair being a dick.
Hair also the same umpire to call many biased towards the W.Indies batsmen and also notorious for calling no balls on Murali after he was cleared by the ICC.
He was proven to be a gambling addict.
Again in 2019 England awarded another match, not winning it.
@@benthirlaway6013 nobody cries, everyone in India will tell you New Zealand won the CWC, even my aus and new zealander friends also think NZ won that,
However, your blood is polluted from a long time nothing wrong with you, may god bless you
England didn’t deserve that World Cup
The only team in the history of cricket that awarded a world cup not winning it. Because it'll never happen again, never happened before this.
@@benthirlaway6013 I have no doubt that England and India both were the strongest teams of the CWC and I'd told my friends that world cup would be won either by Indians or English 50/50,
But still New Zealand played good that day, they deserved the cup more than England, England choked badly in 2nd innings
@@benthirlaway6013 true I accept what you said,
Mr Hair has caused cricket to be the loser on more than one occasion. For him to cite racism is one of the funnier things I've heard in a while.
He was the wanker who decided to call Murali for a no ball even though the ICC had reviewed his action and declared it to be fine but oh no, he thinks he knows better.
Goabnb94 Muralist was called for chucking because he’s a checker, and Darrell Hair has the balls to call him out. Murals should have been forced to change his action.
@@shanejarvis1108 Except that the entire cricketing world and governing body were in agreement that he was fine. Quite literally they had a investigation all entirely focused on Murali's action and came away with the decision that he was not chucking just double jointed. But no, Hair thinks he knows better and can overturn that very ruling.
@@rznotorious6103 well he was a chucker
peter barber ok mate whatever u say, u guys lowlifes are corrupt form the bottom of ur heart with racism , so there is no use in arguing with you
3:26 I didn't know Einstein was on the ICC!!!
Hahahah you banged it bro.
He is an official from the PCB.
Arjuna Ranatunga....Sourav Ganguly and Inzimam...the bold and fair Asian captains who stood for their players and team in the toughest of the situations created by the Mentally imbalanced Umpires....
That Pakistan bowling of that high standards didn't need tampering to win the match! I remember how Yousuf was playing in that series as well! These cloud warriors must be exposed one day. Remember how they accused India for that Ian bell runout for not holding on to the spirit of cricket but in the same series when Bajji had a huge inside edge (broad's hattrick) , those assholes didn't even mind to call him back to play! If Cricket is a gentleman's game, Aussies and the English are the chutiyas of it
Jedidiah Daniel well there was DRS. Just the Indians decided not to use it. If there had been DRS, India would’ve reviewed that straight away, and it would be not out. It was awful umpiring, but a great spell from Broad.
Pakistan was cruising in the match. England needed 33 runs to make Pakistan bat again, with only Paul Collingwood, Ian Bell & Chris Read remaining as good batsmen, all the bowlers were useless with the bat & Flintoff was missing. It was still a very good pitch to bat on with Yousuf in Bradmanesque form, he alone would have chased whatever England posted as target.
Darrell Hair was a racist who framed Pakistan by planting false evidence in order to falsely prove them guilty of crime. He should have been impriosoned like Mohammad Amir, Mohammad Asif & Salman Butt he was a disgraceful cheat who ruined the reputation of the sport since he was corrupted. He should have been banished forever.
One of the reasons why we Indians love Dada(Sourav Ganguly) so much is the way he crushed the hollow pride of English Cricket under his feet at the Lord's in NatWest Trophy final.
Jedidiah Daniel Aussies atleast accepted it
Ur absolutely nailed it bro👍👍👍
Good to see Indians supporting Inzi
Love ❤️ From Lahore
Darryl Hair is Pakistan's Steve Buckner :P
Well Steve Buckner was an exceptional umpe. Who had a hawk eye. There was no review or 3rd umpire system. He was always right. In the end he might have made few errors, but hey! He is a human. Come on bro.
huzzaifa bin liaqat Even Aussies laughed on his decisions which were given in their favour..
huzzaifa bin liaqat lol
@@SlmpleTruth good one, man
@@SlmpleTruth "he is only human" that is the reason why they have 3rd umpires and reviews !
Well done to Inzimam for standing his ground and defending his team!!
I really didn't understand the situation.England were being awarded the match and the Pakistan side refuse to go in the dressing room.Indeed,it was totally a misunderstanding from the umpires in my opinion.Because if some people are saying that the ball is fine so then how can it be happened.
Huge respect for Inzi on this issue...
Similar thing would have happened with Srilanka.. it's the umpiring issue
it was hair on both times too
@@aqibmohammad6457 the guy has some serious issues that two against Asian teams
@@poovanna4284 ICC provoked this incident by insisting Hair officiate pakistan matches, when there was ample proof to show he was giving bad decisions and biased in all his matches towards pakistan players. This was happening long before the Oval incident.
we should be proud of inzamam for standing his ground.....
Just on a nice warm day, when birds are chirping, sun shining, cool breeze flowing, gardens blossoming, White people being White people.
very well said
I'm an Australian, and this was unfair to Pakistan. Without any evidence of tempering of the ball, and no visible tempering with it, the umpire had no reason to award penalty score to England, and moreover they asked Batsmen to select the new ball. All this over no proof against Pakistan.
You're not Australian: no aussie says "tempering", that's what Asians say. The word is "tampering".
@@mikespearwood3914 lol exposed
tempering, lol
Probably ICC should make it clear, what a team can do if they get treated unfairly during the passage of the game. It sounds ridiculous that even after Pakistan decided to come back again, the Umpires stood against the resumption. All these things with no proof whatsoever!
I think until about 2010, Umpires had a history of making biased decisions against Asian teams. Accusing Muralitharan of Chucking, Syndey test controversy with India followed by Monkey gate incident, and this game. Clearly in all three circumstances, Cricket was the loser!
Monkey Gate wasn't the umpires, that was a player complaint. I'll agree on Murali as i believe the umpires were going against the wishes of the ICC and Boards, who OK'D his action. But up until neutral umpire came in (i think early to mid 2000), there were plenty of decisions that were controversial all over. Both Asian and non, just very few were outside of a dodgy LBW or two.
Proof is not recquired. Its at the umpire's discretion. The awarding of the game to england also followed the laws of cricket.
You can have a whinge but they are the rules.
After this test i think ball tampering laws may have been changed.
@@goofydraws
Sorry sir you are incorrect. Murrali was no balled 5 times by daryl hair in the Melbourne test in 1993. It was murralis 23rd test.
His action was cleared by the icc in 1999. He was judged to have a congenital defect in his bowling arm. Fair enough.
Hair was correct to no ball.him because he was the umpire and rhat was his opinion
The umpire runs the game.
Chris Buesnell wrong the umpires officiate the game in accordance to the set rules. The ICC and other national cricket councils and boards run the game.
@@stevenreed5514
Do we now need a dictionary? The umpire officiates/ runs the game on the field. Hair and his fellow umpire made the decisions at the time. What should he have done in your view. This is all bulshit really.
Pakistan should have resumed play after the tea break. Australia would have. They should have. Instead they spat the dummy and one eyed pakistan supporters are still whinging and crying racism. Get over it.
I am from india and i am with pakistan
I am from western hemisphere and im with pakistan
@@shreysharma5182 😂😂😂
I am from earth and I am with Pakistan.
Regards
Thnx
im from sun im with pakistan
Thats an amazing intro and outro to the video, flipping slides and counting years. There was even a slide of zidane headbutting materazzi
Look the Pakistan team has done more than a couple of things to bring cricket in disrepute.. but this clearly wasn't one of them. This was a wrong call and very unfair. Daryl Hare had a history of racial discrimination and he rightly suffered for it at as result of his actions after this game.
Tell me a single country who didnt bring disrepute for cricket?
Nope pakistan wrong doing is taken way too seriously...every country has its fair share
Bullshit
@@TheZeeshanumer96 United States of America.
@@TheZeeshanumer96 france
What Inzi did was a brave thing. None of the Captains had the balls to do that. Pakistan was in pole position to win the Match yet Inzi decided to stand his ground and we Pakistani were behind him for every step of the way. He made us proud.
I was there that day. Was actually very fun being in the crowd. Everyone got incredibly drunk during the evening session and made the most of the drama. Barmy army were in full swing.
wtf! Pakistan was wronged.
they shld stand for their team. . .
Love from 🇮🇳
Nilanjan Paul thanks brother 🇵🇰
Inzy was right to do what he did. Proud of him.
Shows you how important umpires are. A bad one can ruin the game's history.
Pakistan had repeatedly told icc that hair was biased but they had refused to listen only to later find out that hair had committed fraud as well
I am in Indian but I am with Pakistan in this they were wronged and stripped off a test match. Black day for cricket .
chup be chutiye xD. no one gives a fuck about your opinion
@@Opacity5 and yours either
How were they stripped of a test. They didnt win it. So they couldnt be stripped. They forfeited the test.
@@chrisbuesnell3428 I think what he's trying to say, that Pakistan we're stripped off playing the match by the umpires, and without really playing and fighting for it, umpires awarded match to england
@@anubhav111196
What were the options
Paksitan refused to come out after the tea break. After 30 minutes it was deemed a forfeit.
The players dont run 4he game. The umpires do. Hair was found to have abided 100 per cent by the law if cricket by match referee.
The icc found no evidence of ball tampering. Inzaman was found guilty of bringing game into disrepute. I cant see what else the umpire could have done except ignore what they thought was ball tampering.
I still respect Inzy for standing up for his team, the only way he could really get everyones attention was to not take the field. Maybe looking back he shouldve led them out when he was sure he had drawn everyones attention to the problem and before the 20mins had elapsed. Its a shame.
Being an Indian,I fully supported Inzamam's stand,,, he did the right thing, &anyone else could do the same,,,, Mr. Hare didnot even ask Inzy for the changed ball,, he asked the batsman,,, it was really humiliation,,,,
India vs West Indies match was also tied... Why wasn't that match included in tied game?? See 0:13 seconds
Daryl Hair has brought disrepute to the game of cricket
Not many of u might agree with Cricket's big 3 policy. Even I don't. But India's inclusion in it has ever kept these racist boards (ECB and CA) under check. India becoming the major contributor in terms of finance to world cricket has ever since changed the way decisions are taken by the ICC. At least now severe punishments are given to both Aussies and English as well. As an asian I feel happy that ECB and CA have no other option but to listen to BCCI before key decisions.
Very interesting point of view! I totally agree with your point
I'm from Pakistan. Throughout the 90s I saw discrimination from ECB and ACB towards weaker boards. So I was happy when BCCI started pulling their weight. The harbhajan symonds incident comes to mind. But then it became more about money than power, that's where the big 3 faltered.
What punishments are handed out more fairly now compared to before?
All India did during the Andrew Symonds and Harbhajan incident was threaten to leave the tour. Not really pulling your weight, that's throwing it around because your big.
@@goofydraws Yup and people had to cave in. Calk it whatever but Aussies an English hate this type of Hegemonization right. I mean now they are no longer the advicing authority all that matters is your daddy BCCI.
I am an INDIAN and I know that inzamam can't do such things
U can't punish some 1 without proof if he has taken his team out
He must have felt something wrong in the match A MAN WHO HAS MORE THAN 10K RUNS , TRIPLE CENTURY,SINGLE HANDEDLY TOOK PAK TO 1992 FINAL (IN A TOUGH SITUATION AGAINST NZ) CAN'T DO SUCH THINGS
Hello mr capital letters.
Can i refer you to.the laws of cricket previous to this test. Proof is not recquired. Its at the umpires discretion. In other words the umpires who both agreed by the way determined the ball had been tampered with. Inzaman was a good player but you and i both know he was no saint.
@@chrisbuesnell3428 Hello mister racist hypocrite do you know your idol hair was gambling freak and he got caught and got punishment for it. He probably was the first umpire in history to fix match.
@@jacxjon
Rather than abuse me someone you dont know learn about the rules of cricket. Regarding racism please have a look in the mirror.
Have a nice day
@@chrisbuesnell3428 please see a psychiatrist, you really need one. Have a good day too sir :)
@@jacxjon
Thank you. Could I get a referral from you ?
I remember this match me and my cousin brother was watching the match and we get so confused about this situation
Imagine India vs Pakistan playing world cup final with Daryl heir and Steve Bucknor as umpires for the game with no DRS
Match Result - Umpire won by wrong decisions
Oh bhai Pak aur ind ki crowd nikal ke maare gi Umpires ko😂😂😂
@@mashhoodtahir9588 bhai aapne sahi kaha
Bhai maar ho jati
this is a very simplified vesion of the story. espncricinfo should have come up with a better narrative that highlights Inzi questioning Hair and Hair's past discrepancies against Pakistan and overall as an umpire
Not the only match england were awarded... #CWC19
To date, they still do not have any evidence of ball tampering. Hair had predetermined before the game that he was going to charge Pakistan with tampering and was looking for some minor mark on the ball to do so. He is a disgrace and an embarrassment to the game.
Darrel Hair suing ICC for RACIAL DISCRIMINATION! This has to be the biggest joke ever! A dude who no-balled Murali and then accused Pakistan of tampering without evidence. Whats similarity between the two teams? Ya, you guessed that right! What a joke !!
It was because the black umpire Billy Doctrine wasn't punished to the same extent, if at all.
Darrel Hair was involved in controversy, there is no disputing that. I don't remember him as a good umpire, mainly the controversies. But they showed him the door as a result of this match. Apparently he was the 2nd best based on rankings at this time, if these rankings are to be believed. You can understand why he would have thought the way he did.
@@goofydraws umm sorry goofy my post was not at you it was at the idiot that you were commenting on. I'm absolutely gobsmacked how if a white umpire calls up a player/team for cheating against a sub continent team it's racist but if he accuses them of being racist they say he's even more racist this is why cheating is so prevalent in the game now because the ICC hasn't backed up their umpires or the spirit of the game is the a side in world cricket who hasn't been caught cheating & corrupting this beautiful game it sickens me after playing for 25yrs. RustyinOZ
Murali deserved to be no-balled. He chucked.
India, Pakistan, Afghanistan who cares? At the end we are all humans in love with the amazing game of cricket.♥️
That was harsh call on Pakistan ,,love the way inzaman stood to his team ,,love from india
4:15 this always happens
Inzy always have had huge self respect …. And that for me what defines a person … he was right …. Hair got fired later
Waiting for EP 11 @espncricinfo! Bring it fast
Punchline ..no evidence of ball tempering. I'd say that's a great decision by Inzimam . He was lewd on calling his team 'cheats'
Livid not lewd
@@Jehandaruwalla
😂
Perhaps the only good came out of this controversy was that Umpiring standards have improved a great deal since then. Could not understand if match referee' s decision is not to be counted or considered, then what is his role then, except flipping the coin for toss....
Clearly the umpires are mad here.. inzamam did the right thing
If Darrell Hair is involved, there’s always trouble. Once a convict....
Oh? What was Hair convicted of?
Everyone salty at England. Isn’t that a shame. Yes it was awful umpiring. But it was hardly match fixing. And we actually are decent at cricket. So the insults are misinformed
Why was it awful umpiring?
If you were the umpire and you were certain there was ball tampering youd do nothing ?
Hair at the time was rated number 2 umpire in the world. 70 odd tests. Plus an ex player. He acted exactly according to the laws of the game. Which he knew.
I remember when this happened and interesting thing was bcci, bcb, wicb, csa, and scb all gave statements that they are with Pakistan on this issue and this umpire was removed bcz other then aus and eng every other cricket board went against him.
Not strictly true. Nz sided with australia and england. Yes he was taken off the elite panel. He umpired 2nd tere matches and did get a few test matches in 2008 but effectively his career was over.
Chris Buesnell i think I haven’t wrote nz name! Did i?
@@HassanulHaqsaleemi
I dont want to be picky.
Hassan ulHaq lool the irony each supporting their own. Racism is built in I guess
@@mikejosh5826
I don't see how its racist
Did Warner and smith get suspended because they were white ?
Really nice content man...and i believe pakistan never need to do ball tampering ..they have been producing world-class bowlers...n thats on of reason india vs pakistan matches are loved more..they got best bowlers and we got best batsmens
Thanks for the respect bro ❤
We need to stand UNITED against these angraiz
Completely agree. They enjoy seeing us fighting when they created the fight in the first place
We had some good batsmans too shahid afridi
@@syedirtazabukhari7713 afridi was never consistent with the bat look at his average but just his power hitting ability would enable him to carry pakistan to victory so i wouldn't classify him as a good batsmen
@@saeedahmedjamali7235 ye I agree. He was a great bowler but I wouldn't call him a world class batsman...
But you have to admit every team needs an afridi
Inzamam won court case against the umpires for this match. Funny how it isnt mentioned here. Crooks those umpires
All cricketing nations with dark-coloured players viz. India, Sri Lanka, Pakistan and the West Indies have encountered Hair’s racism over the years. He should never umpire another match.
Excellent series! Thank you so much ESPN.
I don’t understand why Trump was shown at the end although very briefly. Cricket has it’s own problems to deal with !
Vids MSS hahahaha that’s what I was thinking too....
@ESPNcricinfo - there's no need for the subtitles throughout the video. If somebody wants subtitles, they can switch them on. And the 'swish' as the yellow thing moves across is annoying and distracting.
I am Bangladeshi, but you can not punish a team without proof.
Can i recommend you to the laws of cricket. The umpire is the sole arbitrator of the game. Its his opinion. The scratches on the ball were enough proof in the minds of both umpires.
In other words. You can slash outside off stump. Miss the ball by 3 feet. But if the umpire thinks your out your bloody out
@@chrisbuesnell3428 why are you so keen to defend the indefensible? Probably because your team won't ever have to face something like this
@@Pjj878
Well its not indefensible. You just think it is.
@@chrisbuesnell3428 No proof, simple (hopefully even for you)
I like how you put Zidane in reverse calender and it's a cricket channel
Also Google.
Daryll Hare is the 2nd worst international umpire.
(Worst is Steve Randell)
He took more wickets and scored more runs for Australia than any actual player.
Ross Emerson
Except he didn't umpire australia
@@chrisbuesnell3428 not sure who your writing about.
Hare and Randall both umpired ozzy games.
Both flat out cheats
Dharmasena: am i a joke to you
I’m English but honestly I’m on Pakistan’s side
This was one of the biggest injustices in Cricket history...
So it changed cricket....how?? You covered what happened but never clearly said how it changed the game.
The problem was entirely with Darrell bloody Hair. Andrew Strauss (who was the captain) and England never made any complaints in that test match.
Hair made it all about him (as he always did). Always seemed to have an issue with Asian countries. Funny that...🤔
That last point from chappel sums it all
You guys can make a good netflix 25 episodes series out of this. Need more content and add videos to the story to make it more watchable.
We should applaud Darell Hair for wonderfully SCREWING UP an amazing game with his absolute pin-point decision-making.
Ye Daryll Hair aur Steve Bucknor ko KISNE umpiring certificate diya? They are always involved in some sub-standard umpiring or disrespectful controversy!!
Rules state that if the team refuses to walk about, they forfeit. That's what happened and Pakistan, Icc should stand by it.
It's irrelevant to ball tampering. You either forfeit in protest or don't. You don't get to have it both ways.
Darrell Hair will go down in infamy as one of the most biased umpires in world cricket. It does not matter whether what he did was according to the letter of law, the very fact that he never showed any form of common sense and human decency speaks volumes of the man. There are many umpires in world cricket who are respected around the world and are known to be strict but they have good communication with the team captains and rarely behave unilaterally in cases where some dialogue is required.
Finally, Mark Nicholas got a voice.
In all fairness, Pakistan has always been wrongly accused of ball tampering, I'm not saying they don't do it but "everybody else" does it too, there were/are English county players who used to use rough papers/bottle caps, zipper back pockets and some are even trained in specifically to temper ball. Only recently we saw Aussies getting caught red-handed, no body is dumb enough to believe that this is the only and first incident. The thing is, it's just Pakistani bowlers manage to get more purchase out of it than anybody else and that's what's the real problem. You Brits are hypocrites and I'm not Pakistani, so I've no reason to be biased about it.
No, you are clearly a different nationality with issues with the English. Much more level-headed then?
THE DAY WHEN DARRYL HAIR LOST HIS SANITY!!!
So... How did it change cricket then??
Empires of Australia and England especially two empires "Hair and Shepherd" had always grudge against Pakistan. Many a times Pakistan had lost matches because of empires wrong decisions. Now thanks to DRS system that malpractices of empires has been reduced.
Shakoor Rana say's Hi.
Umpires, they're called umpires.
Hair had a reputation and history that he was against subcontinent teams ..
I would have led my team out but then 'delivered' the first ball myself by running up and punching Hair in the back of the head- BOOM! You bindside us with your ball-tampering allegations, we'll blindside you! Now we're even!
Tremendous display of spirit of cricket by the umpires!
Hair was a very nasty man if not racists, Pakistan team repeatedly requested ICC not to ask him to super-wise a Pakistan match BUT ICC never listened which led to that day,
Should test teams be able to chose who will be the umpire ?
So if australia or england for example get an umpire they dont like they refuse to play ?
@@chrisbuesnell3428 bit more than just not liking someone though isn't it? Terrible comparison
@@Pjj878
Ok should teams be able to chose their umpire ?
@@chrisbuesnell3428 No, however they should be able to request a change of umpire if they can at least give some sort of reasoning as to why. That doesn't mean they pick which one they get but they should certainly be allowed to complain if they feel they have been aggrieved or unfairly treated by an umpire
@@Pjj878
I would agree with that. Not change after a match started. But yes i can see a situation .
0:12 Another Test Match Between India v West Indies Got Tied, where is that data?
Bucknor Was Worse Than Hair
Nah......no way. Hare-brained was waaaaay worse!
Why do the subtitles require their own graphic and swoshing sound?
WOW Pakistan was acctually given a fair shake for once !
Actually India was almost going to be the one first forfeiting a match when Sunil gavaskar against Australia decided to walkout with the non striker as umpire gave him lbw on a ball that clearly had hit his bat but then one official of Indian team controlled the situation. Gavaskar later told that in that match many wrong decisions were given by the umpire which clearly favoured Australia, a day before this incident Australia was batting and Syed kirmani wanted to walk out due to these decisions but he didn't. Atlast India won that match
Reminds me of the incident when sunil gavaskar walked off the field in a match against australia when judged wrongly by the umpire and decision given unilaterally in favour of denis lily. The australian side showed the worst gentlemanly behavior all throughout that game. Had it not been for the Indian team manager decision, it could have been the first recorded forfeit match in cricketing history
bit of a misleading title. just explains the forfeit, not how it actually changed cricket
Darrell Hair threatened to sue for racial discrimination? What part of this saga was racist?
I think he was upset that the other umpire who agreed with the ball tampering faced no sanction
Further he was taken iff the elite panel of umpires by the 4 asian countries along with west indies, sourh africa.
Having said that i dont think it was racist. He didnt sue by the way either.
What is the difference between a draw and a tie
So Pakistan know how we felt when D/L decided we have 1 ball to get 22 runs back in 1992..
That wasn't D/L tho
It was DRS but you are right