Historical matchmaking would be Sharman vs Panzer 4s, with a single Tiger or Panther thrown in the mix (with a much higher SP cost for example). An army of Tigers fighting Shermans is not historical, stop using this bad argment
@@KekusMagnus The Germans weren't as careless with their tank division arrangements as freeaboos like to think. There were not just random tigers tacked on to every seventeenth panzer iv platoon. Tigers were either part of the larger panzer divisions, or were assigned to smaller independent heavy tank battalions, that could move to wherever they were needed and support divisions. They also travelled in platoons, not a platoon of four 38 ts and a tiger, but actual complete platoons of tigers. There also were not tigers just sitting in fields like the film Fury. So yes, twenty tigers at a time would be historical. However, the chance of having a 16 tiger vs 16 sherman match would be almost nothing, because Americans almost never saw tiger Is. Historical matchmaking would be most games panzer ivs (j and h variants), and maybe a platoon of panther gs vs mixes of 75 and 76 shermans.
The armor pen values are realistic on paper. But it doesn’t really factor in that when engagements with heavy tanks happened back then it was basically knife range. For the United States. A 75 or 76 within a couple hundred yards would own a tiger. Especially with the bad steel these late to mid war tanks were built with.
Genuinely glad ur memes acc make sense to the context. And your meme placement is very modest and not over exaggerated like others and your video was funny and interesting.
Sherman tanks weren’t designed to go 1v1 against Tigers. They were designed around a top tier engine and were highly mobile, reliable, easy to use, easy to manufacture, easy to maintain, were upgradable, used top tier ammo.
Advice for anyone trying this Just take the m24 Chaffee ,same gun , same 50. Cal, armor is just as effective( which means not at all) plus good reverse, better stabilizer and scouting I take to 6.0 all the time
@5co756 Well, the panzer4 was the most common German tank in ww2 and was used heavily even at the end of the war. Fun fact, the main reason why the panther was developed was because the cost of the panzer4 was too high
@@SHEEPS_123 Pz4 F2 saw combat in 1942 , same as Tiger 1 . The M4 and the Pz4 are on the perfect historic BR , the problem is that the Tiger 1 is way too high in WT . It should be from 4.0 to 6.0 , but this would be way too unfair . It saw M3Lee , Matilda and Crusaders in North Africa , you can't do this in game .
Edit: bro didn't knew about the cupola shot on the tiger 1 😭 Short 75mm sherman vs Tiger 1 is doable, vs a panther is a little more difficult, vs the german heavy casemates is really hard, vs a tiger II if you win you're a legend.
as a japanese main i also do like you.i make historical japanese line up (chi ha kai. ho ni. ho i. so. ki. ha go. A6m5) all of these in a battle rating 5.0 and i getting 3-7 kills. but its to risky. 🙂
good video i have to say, good job. Do take it a bit easier on the heavy edits tho xD I think the way u talk is funny, give us so more of you man, dont be shy or anything. Plus, there is no need for the sort of begging outro, get ur confidence up you good!
I see a ton of potential with your videos, I do notice that your editing style is very similar to Dollarplays, I recommend you try to do your own twist on his editing style so that people don't think you're blatantly copying him, but otherwise your content is enjoyable, could be improved in visual quality, but I understand if you can't afford any of the fancy equipment like the bigger gaming UA-camrs or you simply don't have the storage to create HD videos, but I'm not saying you're doing bad with your videos, I'm just giving you some general ideas that you could improve with the style and quality of your videos
interesting video. i guess the low~ish video and sound quality is from a less good pc? or wrong bitrate things? And dont get me wrong. the base of the video is nice. but the quality is suffering a lot
@@POTATODAVEWT obs should work tho, maybe some wrong settings? Alternative you can use nvidia or amd cspture stuff. I dont know how good amd is, but nvidia should be good. I think its called shadowplay(?) Not sure tho
I tried this and it was not that painful. I played the M4A2 and the Chffee both. I played the m4 as if I was a jumbo as far as aiming went and tried to not engage my best performance was 5 kills mainly king tigers being idiotic. Chaffee of course best light tank 8 kill though it was not a full upteir unlike most of the m4 games.
@Troll73778 "This report documented what every crew member knew: the Sherman was dangerously vulnerable to all calibres of German anti-tank guns. The statistics were stunning. Sixty per cent of Allied tank losses were the result of a single shot from a 75 mm or 88 mm gun and two-thirds of all tanks "brewed up" when hit." It really doesn't add up man...
Your historical matchmaker is nonsense. The M4 Sherman went into service in 1942. The pz4h (the long barreled pz4), didn’t even go into production until June of 1943. The majority of the tanks the m4 fought were pz3s and pz4s. In Europe, the US encountered tiger 1s a total of 3 times. If you want historical accuracy, you must argue for allied air superiority of course. Virtually no close air support should be available for Germany in ground battles. And I’m sure you also want the historical accurate reliability of German tanks modeled in game as well, right? It would be funny watching panthers burn out at the start of a match or most of the tigers and panthers being broken down and unusable at the start of a match. Because you want historical matchmaking, right? I’m sure you want to be fighting m4s with nothing but pz3s and short barreled pz4s, right? Edit: I forgot, I’m sure you want the historically accurate match maker on maps like Normandy. US mains are allowed to spawn BBs like the USS Texas and engage in shore bombardment with 14 inch HE shells. That is historically accurate.
My guy it's a one man with a small channel and doing historically(ish) Sherman gameplay during early 1945 of what I think would be the Eastern Theatre, (supposedly) give the lad a break
Pz4 F2 and Tiger 1 saw combat in 1942 , this is historical . You just have all your knowledge of WW2 from UA-cam comment section , broken Tiger's and Panthers . 😂
"he is copying dollar plays" shut up. That guy is kinda annoying. And what is this guy supposed to do? With this logic, anyone who posts war thunder videos is just copying the guy who posted the 1st video about war thunder gameplay
It's like dollarplays on a low budget
No, it's Potato Dave.
EurosParticipates
yengames
IT IS
dollarplays more like centgaming
0:47 tutorial jumpscare
thanks bro, u saved me o-O
scary to see a angled tiger aiming at you when you turn a corner as a sherman knowing you cant do anything
Firefly moment
You can always do something
cannon barrel/breech
@@Th4t0neF0x*yellows*
tracks, barrel, mg port and commander cupola:
I was the pt trying to help you😂😂
🫡
o7
This is why gajin won't add historical matchmaking
Sim battle?
Historical matchmaking would be Sharman vs Panzer 4s, with a single Tiger or Panther thrown in the mix (with a much higher SP cost for example). An army of Tigers fighting Shermans is not historical, stop using this bad argment
@@KekusMagnus The Germans weren't as careless with their tank division arrangements as freeaboos like to think. There were not just random tigers tacked on to every seventeenth panzer iv platoon. Tigers were either part of the larger panzer divisions, or were assigned to smaller independent heavy tank battalions, that could move to wherever they were needed and support divisions. They also travelled in platoons, not a platoon of four 38 ts and a tiger, but actual complete platoons of tigers. There also were not tigers just sitting in fields like the film Fury. So yes, twenty tigers at a time would be historical. However, the chance of having a 16 tiger vs 16 sherman match would be almost nothing, because Americans almost never saw tiger Is. Historical matchmaking would be most games panzer ivs (j and h variants), and maybe a platoon of panther gs vs mixes of 75 and 76 shermans.
@@PzIV-Eokay that sounds pretty cool
@@PzIV-E sounds perfect for pve -hold the line- battles.. but naaaaah we dont need something like gamemodes
Bro found the loop for tigers and panthers, barrel, track, mg port
This is some of the best content I have seen on UA-cam in a while. Seamless meme integration
thanks :)
Inaccurate. In reality, you'd be facing mostly Stugs and Panzer 4s, with the odd big cat sprinkled in.
So 3.7 or 4.0 bro
0:09 they were both cats. Why do they have to do this to each other 😭
If warthunder had historical accurate matchmakin, Germany would absoutly smack ww2 era
Russia the Coldwar, and America the Modern day.
bitrate on this video be all over the place
yea i know :( obs is too laggy on my pc
Not only is this a great idea and looks like fun, the editing is top-notch and had me laughing out loud. Amazing, subbed.
thankyou g
It's nice seeing a channel with not many subscribers put a good amount of effort into a video
blud thinks he's dollarplays
inspiration
The armor pen values are realistic on paper. But it doesn’t really factor in that when engagements with heavy tanks happened back then it was basically knife range. For the United States. A 75 or 76 within a couple hundred yards would own a tiger. Especially with the bad steel these late to mid war tanks were built with.
Since when were tank battles fought like CQC. I’m not making any german bias but a sherman 75 will NOT pen a tiger at hundred meters up
Genuinely glad ur memes acc make sense to the context. And your meme placement is very modest and not over exaggerated like others and your video was funny and interesting.
thanks a lot
Very well made video better than the more popular war thunder channels in my opinion.
thx
Historical Tiger II having an engine failure before the Sherman arrives:
DOLLARplays editing style, love it, keep it up man!
thx a lot
Sherman tanks weren’t designed to go 1v1 against Tigers. They were designed around a top tier engine and were highly mobile, reliable, easy to use, easy to manufacture, easy to maintain, were upgradable, used top tier ammo.
We made 50,000 of them during WW2. They also had excellent radios that could call in air support, a feature no other tank in the war had.
“Historical matchmaking is so superior” mfs when you tell them to play anything other than a tiger:
facts
So this how sherman 75 feel crew feel like in ww2
Advice for anyone trying this
Just take the m24 Chaffee ,same gun , same 50. Cal, armor is just as effective( which means not at all) plus good reverse, better stabilizer and scouting
I take to 6.0 all the time
First time on this channel and I'm surprised how amazing the editing is
thx!
dollarplays vibes 🔥 love the editing
thx
@@POTATODAVEWT better late than never ahh
i thought that the Sherman will have a bad pen, but it has actually good pen!
Your joking?
I love the way he edits like dollarplays🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
thx
Sherman against infantry: 😈
Sherman against Tiger: ☠
1:10 Yeee very lucky
Históricamente almenos los estaunidenses solo se encontraron como con 3 tigers
I have one thing to say, "Cat Killer"
BRO IS cooking🗣️🗣️ (shut, he good)
4;09 so great lol
you should do the panzer4 at its historical battle rating next
And were is this exactly ?
@5co756 Well, the panzer4 was the most common German tank in ww2 and was used heavily even at the end of the war. Fun fact, the main reason why the panther was developed was because the cost of the panzer4 was too high
@@SHEEPS_123 Pz4 F2 saw combat in 1942 , same as Tiger 1 . The M4 and the Pz4 are on the perfect historic BR , the problem is that the Tiger 1 is way too high in WT . It should be from 4.0 to 6.0 , but this would be way too unfair . It saw M3Lee , Matilda and Crusaders in North Africa , you can't do this in game .
@5co756 panzer4 is at 3.7, 76 Sherman's are at 5.7, so no the panzer4 is not necessarily at its historical br
first time i watch your channel and i am suprised that you got only 1.40 k subs
to be fair if you wanna do this historically there should be 1 German tank vs like 30 Sherman's lmao
u ar funny mister dave, good luck
thx
Cool concept but this really is dollarplays on a budget lmao
the bad mic suits perfectly...
i think so to
4:55 Por cosas como estas War Thunder es hermoso (me dió flojera traducir, perdón).
Bro was edging
the 105 sherman's HE shell can kill panthers and tigers if you hit them right
Edit: bro didn't knew about the cupola shot on the tiger 1 😭
Short 75mm sherman vs Tiger 1 is doable, vs a panther is a little more difficult, vs the german heavy casemates is really hard, vs a tiger II if you win you're a legend.
BR
You are not Dollar Plays, but you have a good proposal bro. ✌️
In fact, not even Dollar has made a video like this about Sherman until now.
😛👏
as a japanese main i also do like you.i make historical japanese line up
(chi ha kai. ho ni. ho i. so. ki. ha go. A6m5) all of these in a battle rating 5.0 and i getting 3-7 kills. but its to risky. 🙂
cool. japan is quite hard early tiers
"IS THAT THE GRIM REAPER?"
autismus plays dawnsius in latin XD
It feels like im watching Dollarplays but difeerent
good video i have to say, good job. Do take it a bit easier on the heavy edits tho xD I think the way u talk is funny, give us so more of you man, dont be shy or anything. Plus, there is no need for the sort of begging outro, get ur confidence up you good!
thx, the outro is cos apparently it does actually have effect
Great video bro
thx
Now where’s my Pershing.
Awesome video!
Looking forward for more of thessee
thx, i've posted again now hehe
1:36 LOL
Для большей историчности возьмите два тигра с 6.0 и 10 шерманов с 4.0
Cinematic and a challenge, nice
thx
People be saying bros not dollar plays but it takes skill to edit like that
thx
This aint Dollarplays, this is budgetplays
honestly bro though, keep up the work!
thx a lot!
Absolutely humorous and funny video, I love your editing so much, you gained a sub.
thanks a lot
Erm the tiger H1 is in the thumbnail but its 5.7, you mixed it up for the Tiger E which is 6.0. Also thanks for the fun video. have a nice day
i thought i could get away with it hehe
I see a ton of potential with your videos, I do notice that your editing style is very similar to Dollarplays, I recommend you try to do your own twist on his editing style so that people don't think you're blatantly copying him, but otherwise your content is enjoyable, could be improved in visual quality, but I understand if you can't afford any of the fancy equipment like the bigger gaming UA-camrs or you simply don't have the storage to create HD videos, but I'm not saying you're doing bad with your videos, I'm just giving you some general ideas that you could improve with the style and quality of your videos
thank you , i agree my vids a little too much like his which is why i try to add the cinematic at end with the camera anglkes
0:26 Wild
Historical battle rating, but allies get 5 times more players.
bro is a centplays😂😂
haha
Brilliant film!
thx
Idk how,but you play look fun to watch
interesting video. i guess the low~ish video and sound quality is from a less good pc? or wrong bitrate things?
And dont get me wrong. the base of the video is nice. but the quality is suffering a lot
yes quality is cos i use the default windows game capture cos obs doesnt work for some reason
@@POTATODAVEWT obs should work tho, maybe some wrong settings? Alternative you can use nvidia or amd cspture stuff. I dont know how good amd is, but nvidia should be good. I think its called shadowplay(?) Not sure tho
1:38 TOG II LOCATED!
i love your vid but a little less cutting would be cool for my part cuz i like your personality :/
hehe thanks, but im not very good commentator
I tried this and it was not that painful. I played the M4A2 and the Chffee both. I played the m4 as if I was a jumbo as far as aiming went and tried to not engage my best performance was 5 kills mainly king tigers being idiotic. Chaffee of course best light tank 8 kill though it was not a full upteir unlike most of the m4 games.
That intro dude 💀
haha
Guess that's why they nicknamed the M4 "The Coffin"
Who nicknamed it that? Maybe early models. But Shermans had the highest crew survival rate of any tank of ww2 when destroyed.
@Troll73778 The M4? That's only because so many were made, those statistics don't add up.
@@theblitz6838 that literally makes no sense. Shermans had the highest crew survivability rate when DESTROYED
@Troll73778 "This report documented what every crew member knew: the Sherman was dangerously vulnerable to all calibres of German anti-tank guns. The statistics were stunning. Sixty per cent of Allied tank losses were the result of a single shot from a 75 mm or 88 mm gun and two-thirds of all tanks "brewed up" when hit."
It really doesn't add up man...
@@theblitz6838 source? Also ammo cook off wasn't always instant there was usually enough time for the crew to escape.
intro was pretty funny lol
thx
U got my sub 💯
thank youuu
Bro is NOT Dollarplays 🗣️🗣️
That's exactly what I thought lol
still an amazing video
Amazing video! Subss
Looking forward for more ot thesee
cool to see that dollarplays is inspiring others, i see nothing wrong with people trying to replicate his editing
I really enjoy the video so no hate pls
the intro is the perfect oppertunity to make a furry joke but i dont know any
haha
You are so underrated
Dollarplays filmed with a toaster
The pz 3 was in battalions with tiger 1s
POTATO DAVE （X )
POTATO Dollar ( V )
Your historical matchmaker is nonsense. The M4 Sherman went into service in 1942. The pz4h (the long barreled pz4), didn’t even go into production until June of 1943. The majority of the tanks the m4 fought were pz3s and pz4s.
In Europe, the US encountered tiger 1s a total of 3 times. If you want historical accuracy, you must argue for allied air superiority of course. Virtually no close air support should be available for Germany in ground battles. And I’m sure you also want the historical accurate reliability of German tanks modeled in game as well, right? It would be funny watching panthers burn out at the start of a match or most of the tigers and panthers being broken down and unusable at the start of a match. Because you want historical matchmaking, right?
I’m sure you want to be fighting m4s with nothing but pz3s and short barreled pz4s, right?
Edit: I forgot, I’m sure you want the historically accurate match maker on maps like Normandy. US mains are allowed to spawn BBs like the USS Texas and engage in shore bombardment with 14 inch HE shells. That is historically accurate.
My guy it's a one man with a small channel and doing historically(ish) Sherman gameplay during early 1945 of what I think would be the Eastern Theatre, (supposedly) give the lad a break
The whole idea of M4A1 Shermans fighting tigers alone is just pure Werhaboo fetish lol.
Pz4 F2 and Tiger 1 saw combat in 1942 , this is historical . You just have all your knowledge of WW2 from UA-cam comment section , broken Tiger's and Panthers . 😂
@@5co756 the tiger 1 did went into service in 1942 but didnt saw any najor combat, the pziv f2 did go into service in 1943
Ikv-72 in historical br yea
hey waht do you use to download your memes ?
it is using green screen form creator set on youtube (in desc)
i see potential, future Dollar
thankss
Now panzer 35t and early panzer 4s against KV1s and T-34s
good idea
i like this vid mate
im californan, not british btw
thx
amazing video👍
thx
"Bro is the better dollarplays
thx, dollar plays deffo better though!!!
@@POTATODAVEWT I like you more than him.His voice is driiving me insane
This is like playing japanese tanks. Exept you dont have to uptier yourself as you are uptiered as vanilla. Cuz gaijin just hates japan.
:P
good stuff man
thx
the best content
thx
This strv big caliber from 50-s on 3.7
"he is copying dollar plays" shut up. That guy is kinda annoying. And what is this guy supposed to do? With this logic, anyone who posts war thunder videos is just copying the guy who posted the 1st video about war thunder gameplay
Also this guy has much better editing
tu as mis aussi le nombre juste de char qu'il avait en face on parle de 20 pour un tigre ca va être rigolo
your type of editing reminds me of dolarplays
wow
@@POTATODAVEWT what am i wrong????
@@monikauhlikova8522 oh wait i replied to the wrong message
@@monikauhlikova8522 no u right it is similar
So much fun!
good video
3:47 My Bro got an Org*sm 💀
Off brand Dollarplays
How much hours on Warthunder do you have?
like 4000 hours, i dont use steam so dont know
What if I tell you this is a scam casino?Delete it.