I was possibly the luckiest kid in the world in 1975 when I bought my 63 XKE roadster for $900. It needed lots of work, which I did in my mom’s garage. Drove it to college along with my 73 Kawasaki Z1.
Back in those days they were just used cars, beautiful ones, but not expensive to buy. They were expensive to maintain though. They rusted if exposed to salt, boot floors, pontoons, you name it. In 1971 or soI got one for my then wife, a 1968 I think, paid $2,800. She kept it in the divorce, later offered it to me but I declined. In 1998 I worked for a shop and did rotisserie restorations on three E-Types, by then you could get any piece of sheet metal for them and I replaced floors, bulkheads, pontoons, door skins, trunk floors. While on the rotisserie I rustproofed the chassis with Waxoil, shot it into every cavity and rotated the chassis to make sure the rustproofing got into every seam. I moved away in 1999, haven't seen the cars since but I'm sure they haven't rusted since.
I was a kid washing cars at a Milwaukee sports car dealership owned by Augie Pabst and I remember when this beauty arrived in about 1963. It sold for $5995, a far cry from the BPD 2000 quoted in this video. I just checked and the Brit. pound was worth $1.349 dollars then and the the car sold in Britain for the equivalent of $2698 U.S. dollars. An American sedan sold for $3000-$4000 then in the U.S. $6000 was what the Corvette was selling for and the importers probably wanted the E-Type to be competitively priced. What a beautiful automobile.
For me, a lover of cars, there are many stand out cars, but the right Etype, well, the proportions and curves are just like a leaping animal in perpetual motion... There have been many valiant attempts to better this, I look forward to more, but this classic will always hold a special place in heart. Thanks for the review, reminding us of truly iconic beautiful classics.
First saw the E type when I was a teenager. My brother was a mechanic working for a Jaguar dealership. Thought it was the most beautiful then and still to this day 60 years later. There is a wonderful display of E types at the Prince Albert museum in Monaco
I always loved the E Type. In 1989 I bought a 1962 coupe. It was cheap as it was heavily modified with a corvette motor and a customised body amongst other things. It drove beautifully. In 1994 I had to sell it, along with several other collector cars. It is the one car l wish I had never sold out of the 30 l have owned.
You are dead wrong about top speeds not mattering to consumers in the US. In many areas of the American West, there were either no speed limits (Nevada), or "as appropriate per conditions" (California ). Speed limits back then were generally HIGHER, with speed limits on the early Interstates posted at 70 or higher in the east, and - when Arizona did eventually adopt one - 110.
My Car is a 1968 Dodge Dart with a V8 swap,, it cruises at 75mph and on .. even up to 110mph it's not sweating do to tall rear gears and tires... The 55mph and the 85mph speedometer on U S car's.. afterwards.. His comment is completely false, Daytona Beach was the Land Speed mecca until Bonneville
The hatch back E Type is truly lovely , and in silver is an ANGEL from Heaven , yes it is the most beautiful car ever made , by her lines and the flip up front clip exposing that lovely DOHC Inline Six ... Beautiful , and as a 6' 2.5 " man ... getting in one is nigh impossible , none the less ... if i were shorter ... Ahhh Love. I have too owned a 1991 V12 XJS , with Moto Morelli Ignition , and that system was stone cold reliable. A V12 Jaguar , convertible like I had , you are in a Locomotive , smooth , drawing the chassis along you set behind that Double Six , and you KNOW you have the speed ... I had mine up to 140 mph and she had more and more ... Incredible. Oh , and smooth. Tuscany Bronze 1991 ... .
Enzo, who did not speak English, made “the most beautiful car” comment to Norman Dewis who did not speak Italian. Enzo’s comment was likely misinterpreted when relayed to Dewis. The beauty Enzo referred to could well have been directed towards the E-Type’s mechanical innovations, and not the body styling. By 1961, Ferrari had already styled the Testa Rossa, and the 250 Short Wheel Base was soon to be released. Although the E-Type is a pretty car, it’s hard to believe Enzo could make a remark downplaying his own styling creations. At any rate, the remark was not a Ferrari Press Release. The remark surfaced and was popularized years later after Enzo’s death.
BTW, I wouldn't sweat the pronunciation of the world "jaguar", since evidently the Brits mucked up the original Tupi word "yaguara" that 'jaguar' likely was derived from. Besides, the jaguar is cat in the Americas, so speaking in 'Merican wins by default. 🐆😇
YES! Finally someone that gets it. Going by them, you'd think English never evolved, or evolves. Drive 20 mins. in any direction in their own country, and pronunciations vary on many words. They pronounce Cadillac like "Caddylac", and we don't go around telling them howda say stuff! 🙂 Us "Mercans might be dicks, but going by YT comments, the English seem to excel at bitching. 😁
Your well put together overview of the E-Type’s enduring attraction to car lovers everywhere leaves out one essential influence: Jaguar founder Sir William Lyons (Lyons = Jaguar, get it?), who was acknowledged to have an exceptional eye for car design. This is borne out in the wide range of cars he produced, from the 1950 XK generation sports cars to his greatest accomplishment, the revolutionary XJ6 sedan of 1968, which soared above sedan standards of the time. All his cars, he claimed, had in common a single unbroken line that ran the length of the car. This continuity, uncompromised by unnecessary embellishment, and sporting a singularly feline stance, made all Jaguars standouts in their class.
England calling... Just to say im glad you continue to pronounce Jaguar in your own way. Just as i love the English continuing to use their pronunciation. People should cherish and be proud of their differences! Or we'll all end up as one boring mega race.
The V-12 engine shown @ 9:45 is an experimental 4-cam unit that never went into production and was never used in the E-Type. The E-Type used a simpler 2-cam V-12 engine. You should edit the video and substitute an image of the correct V-12 engine.
For me the only two cars that Ferrari ever had that approached the E-type in beauty were the 275 GTB/4 and the Daytona. But again, like the Aston, they really weren't more than rich men's toys for the most part. I just find the concept of that DOHC six amazing, for all those years!
My godmother and her late husband collected classic British cars and at one point had 3 E types, a kit jaguar ss, and a 1953 Austin Healey 100. For a few years the powder blue E type was the most all original/ best in show on the east cost US. They really did have wacky gear boxes and NEEDED to be double clutched all the time.
The styling has faded a bit over the last 50 years for me, but I did get to solo race a friend's 64 Coupe and they are delicious to drive at the limit. He said the gearbox would make a lot of noise when I downshifted and it sure did. Today I have a 2000 XK8 Coupe.
My brother is a great lover of Jaguar- has 11 of them, to my paltry 3. One of his prized possessions isn't even a car, but a block of wood, signed by none other than Norman Dewis in (I think) 2016. My brother wanted it for his XJ-13 replica. It's not a fiberglass kit on a Mustang chassis, but a full on aluminum racing chassis, with 6 piston front brakes (and mounts for a second caliper on each hub.) I think you will NEED 24 pistons per front wheel to stop the thing, with a 5.3 liter V12 making 460-ish HP, in a car that weighs about 1700 lbs with all fluids. Norman passed in 2019, but famously flipped the XJ-13 in a high speed failure on the high bank of the track, CRAWLED under the dash as it flipped multiple times in the infield, went home and DIDN'T TELL HIS WIFE. She found out the next day, when Norman was back at work, naturally!
I thoroughly enjoyed this like I do all your videos. I love when function follows form and using science and math to get the best performance unintentionally leans to a beautiful shape. It's beautiful in it's simplicity, the shape stands on it's own without need for trim or embellishment.
@@kenhigh8054I appreciate the agreement. In this case, no. I see it as cold, clinical math, figures, and calculations being used to create something that is the best at it's job, but secondarily, strikingly beautiful.
Ok, so not to be argumentative, but what you just described is the beautiful form following (or coming from) the mathematical function - form FOLLOWS function.
@@kenhigh8054 Thanks very much, I have a way of perceiving and describing concepts like that, where I have my own understanding, trying to figure something out and when I talk it out to someone, I find that I understood it all along, just from a different angle. So thank you again, have a great day.
A woman I grew up with got an E-type in about 1969. It was so beautiful and fun to drive around in. I still have not driven one. Yes, the seats can be uncomfortable. I would love to drive one from Milano to Copenhagen with my Viking girlfriend next to me.
Whether Enzo intended the remark to be about the aesthetics or not I can't say, but IMHO it "IS" the most beautiful car ever made. Whatever angle you look at it from it is stunning, and wherever you go in the world everyone knows (and admires) this car, knowing it is by name.
I would rather make a trailer for my kids than have a four door anything. I think jag should have told ppl we aren't making a 4 seater, and if you don't buy as many as we want you to we will raise the price to where it should have been all along.
Most stylish sports car ever? I think the XK 140 is just as beautiful, followed by the Jag mk 4, and maybe the Lea Francis 14hp sports comes in an underrated 4th. 63 Corvette Stingray coupe might get 5th. 1951 Lanchester 14 coupe de ville 6th, (power hood). got one.
Great video BUT... Your comment about top-speed limits is totally wrong. There were no speed limits on British motorways in the 60's, nor were there on many european highways - the Autobahns being the best known examples - hence the popularity of high power european GT cars back then. The 150 MPH speed of the E-Type was absolutely appreciated at that time and could be exploited by its drivers. Excellent video otherwise.
I think the Chevy corvette was the American competition . the coke body shape was .long ,low ,curves , lightweight, strong compact tested . I can’t afford this stuff , I have plastic kit set modals instead . ( dreams are free)
Right? Brits go around pronouncing Cadillac like "Caddylac", and we don't tell them what to do. Going by them, you'd think the English language has never evolved. It evolves right in front of people, and they don't notice.
Among the very best looking, yes. Probably the best looking front-engine car, though the Toyota 2000GT makes a compelling argument for itself. But of all cars and layout types, I like the Gandini's Miura design just a bit more. Also it's arguable inspiration, the Ford GT40, after FAV cleaned up the fussiness of the bodywork of the 'donor' Lola Mk6. And then there's the pinnacle from this branch...Gordon Murray's F1 design.
While the Jaguar XKE was beautiful, IMO, the 1968-1977 Corvette was more beautiful. I own a white 1976 Corvette, and I consider it the most beautiful car ever made. I have owned it for over 30 years, and while I've had other cars that have come and gone, the Corvette has stayed. It has been my dream car since the very early '70s, when I was 10 years old. And while I do like the steel bumper cars, and almost always prefer chrome steel over plastic, the urethane front and rear fascias on the 1974-1977 models gave it that finishing touch. Unlike many cars with plastic covered bumpers, the Corvette design made it look like the car didn't have any bumpers. The downward slope of the rear fascia was the opposite of the flipped up look of the steel bumpered cars. The car no longer had the "bits and pieces" look. Everything fit together perfectly. Of course that all went out the window (literally) in 1978, with that huge bubbleback rear window. And it was all downhill from there.
Drive "safe" or "Drive safely"? The E Type Jag-YOU-ar is the most beautiful car ever...but not just the Series 1. While I prefer mildly the Series 1 "purity of line" covered headlamps and smaller air intake, I prefer--like Sir William Lyons--the Series 2 rear wraparound bumper, tail lamps below the bumpers with that nice splash of chrome behind the licence plate and lights. It makes the car--particularly the OTS--sleeker with a cleaner look...but beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. Good video. Thank you
Then, as now, many of the Ferraris look like different versions of each other. And there are many gorgeous cars, but (for me) one look at the E-Type kinda does the job. Side note: The British announcer in the vintage clip didn't pronounce the last consonant. But we'll not worry about that, will we?
Haha YEP!!!! What a great analogy. Bet comment I've read all day. And MOST ACCURATE! Going by them you'd think the language has never evolved or never does. So BRITCHY! ell oh ell 😁
Here in the UK if you pronounced it "Jag-whar" you'd sound like some posh upper-class twit. Normal people say "Jag-you-a" with a very short "a" at the end as in "data".
I was possibly the luckiest kid in the world in 1975 when I bought my 63 XKE roadster for $900. It needed lots of work, which I did in my mom’s garage. Drove it to college along with my 73 Kawasaki Z1.
Back in those days they were just used cars, beautiful ones, but not expensive to buy. They were expensive to maintain though. They rusted if exposed to salt, boot floors, pontoons, you name it. In 1971 or soI got one for my then wife, a 1968 I think, paid $2,800. She kept it in the divorce, later offered it to me but I declined.
In 1998 I worked for a shop and did rotisserie restorations on three E-Types, by then you could get any piece of sheet metal for them and I replaced floors, bulkheads, pontoons, door skins, trunk floors. While on the rotisserie I rustproofed the chassis with Waxoil, shot it into every cavity and rotated the chassis to make sure the rustproofing got into every seam. I moved away in 1999, haven't seen the cars since but I'm sure they haven't rusted since.
@@3ducs I got to drive it like it was a used car, didn’t baby it.
Indeed you might be! Here in TX in 1975 in college I was driving a 1961 Chevy Biscayne with straight 6 and 3/tree.
For me it is without a doubt the most beautiful car ever made. One of my friends got a '63 for graduation. I'll never forget driving that car.
I was a kid washing cars at a Milwaukee sports car dealership owned by Augie Pabst and I remember when this beauty arrived in about 1963. It sold for $5995, a far cry from the BPD 2000 quoted in this video. I just checked and the Brit. pound was worth $1.349 dollars then and the the car sold in Britain for the equivalent of $2698 U.S. dollars. An American sedan sold for $3000-$4000 then in the U.S. $6000 was what the Corvette was selling for and the importers probably wanted the E-Type to be competitively priced. What a beautiful automobile.
I saw my first E-type in 1962 and fell in love with it. I am now restoring an E-Type. Enough said. I have four Jaguars.
That's Awesome, I've always been in love with the Design...
Cheers from Orange County California 🇺🇸
I agree, the most beautiful car ever. Nothing since has ever come close!
For me, a lover of cars, there are many stand out cars, but the right Etype, well, the proportions and curves are just like a leaping animal in perpetual motion... There have been many valiant attempts to better this, I look forward to more, but this classic will always hold a special place in heart. Thanks for the review, reminding us of truly iconic beautiful classics.
First saw the E type when I was a teenager. My brother was a mechanic working for a Jaguar dealership. Thought it was the most beautiful then and still to this day 60 years later. There is a wonderful display of E types at the Prince Albert museum in Monaco
I always loved the E Type. In 1989 I bought a 1962 coupe. It was cheap as it was heavily modified with a corvette motor and a customised body amongst other things. It drove beautifully. In 1994 I had to sell it, along with several other collector cars. It is the one car l wish I had never sold out of the 30 l have owned.
You are dead wrong about top speeds not mattering to consumers in the US. In many areas of the American West, there were either no speed limits (Nevada), or "as appropriate per conditions" (California ). Speed limits back then were generally HIGHER, with speed limits on the early Interstates posted at 70 or higher in the east, and - when Arizona did eventually adopt one - 110.
Yeah I picked up on that. There was no speed limit in Britain either (outside towns) when the E-type was launched.
My Car is a 1968 Dodge Dart with a V8 swap,, it cruises at 75mph and on .. even up to 110mph it's not sweating do to tall rear gears and tires...
The 55mph and the 85mph speedometer on U S car's.. afterwards..
His comment is completely false, Daytona Beach was the Land Speed mecca until Bonneville
The hatch back E Type is truly lovely , and in silver is an ANGEL from Heaven , yes it is the most beautiful car ever made , by her lines and the flip up front clip exposing that lovely DOHC Inline Six ... Beautiful , and as a 6' 2.5 " man ... getting in one is nigh impossible , none the less ... if i were shorter ... Ahhh Love. I have too owned a 1991 V12 XJS , with Moto Morelli Ignition , and that system was stone cold reliable. A V12 Jaguar , convertible like I had , you are in a Locomotive , smooth , drawing the chassis along you set behind that Double Six , and you KNOW you have the speed ... I had mine up to 140 mph and she had more and more ... Incredible. Oh , and smooth. Tuscany Bronze 1991 ... .
Enzo, who did not speak English, made “the most beautiful car” comment to Norman Dewis who did not speak Italian. Enzo’s comment was likely misinterpreted when relayed to Dewis. The beauty Enzo referred to could well have been directed towards the E-Type’s mechanical innovations, and not the body styling.
By 1961, Ferrari had already styled the Testa Rossa, and the 250 Short Wheel Base was soon to be released. Although the E-Type is a pretty car, it’s hard to believe Enzo could make a remark downplaying his own styling creations.
At any rate, the remark was not a Ferrari Press Release. The remark surfaced and was popularized years later after Enzo’s death.
I bet you're right. Especially considering what an ego-driven prick he was.
@@UberLummoxYou mean how like all italians are😂
Who on earth put that roof rack on an E-type?
BTW, I wouldn't sweat the pronunciation of the world "jaguar", since evidently the Brits mucked up the original Tupi word "yaguara" that 'jaguar' likely was derived from. Besides, the jaguar is cat in the Americas, so speaking in 'Merican wins by default. 🐆😇
YES! Finally someone that gets it. Going by them, you'd think English never evolved, or evolves.
Drive 20 mins. in any direction in their own country, and pronunciations vary on many words.
They pronounce Cadillac like "Caddylac", and we don't go around telling them howda say stuff! 🙂
Us "Mercans might be dicks, but going by YT comments, the English seem to excel at bitching. 😁
Your well put together overview of the E-Type’s enduring attraction to car lovers everywhere leaves out one essential influence: Jaguar founder Sir William Lyons (Lyons = Jaguar, get it?), who was acknowledged to have an exceptional eye for car design. This is borne out in the wide range of cars he produced, from the 1950 XK generation sports cars to his greatest accomplishment, the revolutionary XJ6 sedan of 1968, which soared above sedan standards of the time. All his cars, he claimed, had in common a single unbroken line that ran the length of the car. This continuity, uncompromised by unnecessary embellishment, and sporting a singularly feline stance, made all Jaguars standouts in their class.
England calling...
Just to say im glad you continue to pronounce Jaguar in your own way. Just as i love the English continuing to use their pronunciation. People should cherish and be proud of their differences! Or we'll all end up as one boring mega race.
8:12 When the E-type came out, most countries didn't have speed limits.
The V-12 engine shown @ 9:45 is an experimental 4-cam unit that never went into production and was never used in the E-Type. The E-Type used a simpler 2-cam V-12 engine. You should edit the video and substitute an image of the correct V-12 engine.
It also never appeared as a 6 litre in the E-Type, so worthy of an edit
Malcolm Sayer was an absolute genius.
For me the only two cars that Ferrari ever had that approached the E-type in beauty were the 275 GTB/4 and the Daytona. But again, like the Aston, they really weren't more than rich men's toys for the most part. I just find the concept of that DOHC six amazing, for all those years!
E-Type, Ferrari 250 GTO, Ford Cobra, Ford GT-40, Corvette C2.
Geez, Henry Higgins was right when he said it in My fair lady. "English!, Americans haven't used it for years".
You dont get it till you see a real e type hard top in real life….. its so beautiful
My godmother and her late husband collected classic British cars and at one point had 3 E types, a kit jaguar ss, and a 1953 Austin Healey 100. For a few years the powder blue E type was the most all original/ best in show on the east cost US. They really did have wacky gear boxes and NEEDED to be double clutched all the time.
The styling has faded a bit over the last 50 years for me, but I did get to solo race a friend's 64 Coupe and they are delicious to drive at the limit. He said the gearbox would make a lot of noise when I downshifted and it sure did. Today I have a 2000 XK8 Coupe.
My brother is a great lover of Jaguar- has 11 of them, to my paltry 3. One of his prized possessions isn't even a car, but a block of wood, signed by none other than Norman Dewis in (I think) 2016. My brother wanted it for his XJ-13 replica. It's not a fiberglass kit on a Mustang chassis, but a full on aluminum racing chassis, with 6 piston front brakes (and mounts for a second caliper on each hub.) I think you will NEED 24 pistons per front wheel to stop the thing, with a 5.3 liter V12 making 460-ish HP, in a car that weighs about 1700 lbs with all fluids. Norman passed in 2019, but famously flipped the XJ-13 in a high speed failure on the high bank of the track, CRAWLED under the dash as it flipped multiple times in the infield, went home and DIDN'T TELL HIS WIFE. She found out the next day, when Norman was back at work, naturally!
Jeremy Clarkson's description and pronunciation of a Jag sums up everything about Jags.
The E-type is a great car, and a very pretty one too. Personally though, I prefer an XJS, I think it's better looking, at least in coupe form.
I thoroughly enjoyed this like I do all your videos. I love when function follows form and using science and math to get the best performance unintentionally leans to a beautiful shape. It's beautiful in it's simplicity, the shape stands on it's own without need for trim or embellishment.
I agree with you, except I think you meant to say form follows function, yes?
@@kenhigh8054I appreciate the agreement.
In this case, no. I see it as cold, clinical math, figures, and calculations being used to create something that is the best at it's job, but secondarily, strikingly beautiful.
Ok, so not to be argumentative, but what you just described is the beautiful form following (or coming from) the mathematical function - form FOLLOWS function.
@@kenhigh8054 Thanks very much, I have a way of perceiving and describing concepts like that, where I have my own understanding, trying to figure something out and when I talk it out to someone, I find that I understood it all along, just from a different angle.
So thank you again, have a great day.
You as well, my friend.
Oil consumption? My dealer told me that 1 quart per 1,000 miles was not considered excessive.
I owned a FB model RX-7. 🙃
It sure is the most beautuhul ever !!,
A woman I grew up with got an E-type in about 1969. It was so beautiful and fun to drive around in. I still have not driven one. Yes, the seats can be uncomfortable. I would love to drive one from Milano to Copenhagen with my Viking girlfriend next to me.
Whether Enzo intended the remark to be about the aesthetics or not I can't say, but IMHO it "IS" the most beautiful car ever made. Whatever angle you look at it from it is stunning, and wherever you go in the world everyone knows (and admires) this car, knowing it is by name.
Agreed 👍 Magnificent design 👌
00:01 I don't know why people are talking about how you say some word but don't worry you say it perfecly... And people will always talk-$hit loll
I like the 58 corvette c1 in red personally
Excellent!! What a beauty
I would rather make a trailer for my kids than have a four door anything. I think jag should have told ppl we aren't making a 4 seater, and if you don't buy as many as we want you to we will raise the price to where it should have been all along.
Most stylish sports car ever? I think the XK 140 is just as beautiful, followed by the Jag mk 4, and maybe the Lea Francis 14hp sports comes in an underrated 4th.
63 Corvette Stingray coupe might get 5th. 1951 Lanchester 14 coupe de ville 6th, (power hood). got one.
Great video BUT... Your comment about top-speed limits is totally wrong.
There were no speed limits on British motorways in the 60's, nor were there on many european highways - the Autobahns being the best known examples - hence the popularity of high power european GT cars back then. The 150 MPH speed of the E-Type was absolutely appreciated at that time and could be exploited by its drivers. Excellent video otherwise.
Easily the 2nd best looking car of all time in my book. (First is the 246 Dino). 😊
Jaguar made beautiful cars, I agree. But the E type (launched July1961) wasn't as beautiful as the Ferrari 250GTO, from 1962
I think the Chevy corvette was the American competition . the coke body shape was .long ,low ,curves , lightweight, strong compact tested . I can’t afford this stuff , I have plastic kit set modals instead . ( dreams are free)
simply the best.
This is a fucking awesome channel! Love it. I’m not that into cars. But the stories are interesting. Not too long, not too short. 👍👍
The Leno default sounds legit.
Right? Brits go around pronouncing Cadillac like "Caddylac", and we don't tell them what to do.
Going by them, you'd think the English language has never evolved. It evolves right in front of people, and they don't notice.
I've been driving in my car
It's not quite a Jaguar
I bought it in Primrose Hill
From a bloke from Brazil
Great storytelling. Next up try the Alfa Romeo spider!
Among the very best looking, yes. Probably the best looking front-engine car, though the Toyota 2000GT makes a compelling argument for itself. But of all cars and layout types, I like the Gandini's Miura design just a bit more. Also it's arguable inspiration, the Ford GT40, after FAV cleaned up the fussiness of the bodywork of the 'donor' Lola Mk6. And then there's the pinnacle from this branch...Gordon Murray's F1 design.
Obvious omission (at least to me) on the 1961 price list - Mercedes 300SL which, I believe was quite quick, and no doubt, a pretty penny.
U make great vids
I knew Enzo Ferrari he never said that
I think that if driving in a Jaguar with its canopy up, you'd better be be below 165 not to hit it?
Mitsubishi 3000GT Series 1 and that's that :)
While the Jaguar XKE was beautiful, IMO, the 1968-1977 Corvette was more beautiful. I own a white 1976 Corvette, and I consider it the most beautiful car ever made. I have owned it for over 30 years, and while I've had other cars that have come and gone, the Corvette has stayed. It has been my dream car since the very early '70s, when I was 10 years old. And while I do like the steel bumper cars, and almost always prefer chrome steel over plastic, the urethane front and rear fascias on the 1974-1977 models gave it that finishing touch. Unlike many cars with plastic covered bumpers, the Corvette design made it look like the car didn't have any bumpers. The downward slope of the rear fascia was the opposite of the flipped up look of the steel bumpered cars. The car no longer had the "bits and pieces" look. Everything fit together perfectly. Of course that all went out the window (literally) in 1978, with that huge bubbleback rear window. And it was all downhill from there.
The 246 Dino was the most beautiful
Ha! didn't show any pics of the year with those hidious black safety bumpers!
But plenty of those GOOFY 2+2s.
Dad owned 3 and my brother now has 1, while I chose the other Jaguar the jaguar Land Rover perentie
00:01 You make good video with alot of Info, great work and they have to say you did something wrong ? What is going on lol
It's Jonathan Wood not Woods. Just messing with you:)
He said "Jonathan Wood's book". 3 times.
The only car more beautiful than an E Type is the Porshe 917 K
0:54 bruh that's a leopard
Tell National Geographic that
@@bartscarstories I think the brits were thinking of that awesome jet black cat when they designed the logo
I might be the only person in the world who doesn’t think the E-Type is that good looking. It looks fine I guess, but it’s not special to me.
Drive "safe" or "Drive safely"? The E Type Jag-YOU-ar is the most beautiful car ever...but not just the Series 1. While I prefer mildly the Series 1 "purity of line" covered headlamps and smaller air intake, I prefer--like Sir William Lyons--the Series 2 rear wraparound bumper, tail lamps below the bumpers with that nice splash of chrome behind the licence plate and lights. It makes the car--particularly the OTS--sleeker with a cleaner look...but beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. Good video. Thank you
Oh god....
Here we go...
Then, as now, many of the Ferraris look like different versions of each other. And there are many gorgeous cars, but (for me) one look at the E-Type kinda does the job.
Side note: The British announcer in the vintage clip didn't pronounce the last consonant. But we'll not worry about that, will we?
It's pronounced Jaaaggggg
Xj13 is way more beautiful.
Also ginetta g4
It's not even the most beautiful car of the sixties, let alone 'ever'...
E no no f 6 or 8
The brits are pissed because we took their language and perfected it.
Haha YEP!!!! What a great analogy. Bet comment I've read all day. And MOST ACCURATE!
Going by them you'd think the language has never evolved or never does. So BRITCHY! ell oh ell 😁
Here in the UK if you pronounced it "Jag-whar" you'd sound like some posh upper-class twit. Normal people say "Jag-you-a" with a very short "a" at the end as in "data".
Overrated and overpriced but pretty
What a load off Waffle
Here we go...we've angered the Britskis.