We're a small but dedicated team on a mission to provide free access to educational content. If you find our content valuable, please support us by subscribing, liking, and sharing our videos. Your engagement makes all the difference!
Young Turks were Donmeh. These were Jews or Crypto Jews who pretended to be Muslims converted but they didn’t convert. These Donmeh installed Arabs Jews to rule Gulf countries.
@@mr.o8539 total bullshit, we send trains full of gold to hejaz every fking year, we didnt touch their language, their culture, all we told them was, we are brothers, but they went with nationalism and took away al quds from the entire ummah by betraying the khalifa, so dont come up here with your third class citizen bullshit, we treated you as equals or even better then the Turks in anatolia, and you guys behaved like total animals towards us
@@mr.o8539 where? Did we change your language? Did we change your culture? Did we force you to do things you didn't want? Now you are not governed by the Turks and you live as first class citizens in Syria, Iraq and Palestine. Congratulations
And if the other side is supported by the brits and germans and etc, then it is not a side to call any act against a rebel. Writing before reading is funny isn't it?!
Turks betrayed the ways of caliphate for centries, all they cared about was war. Arabs shoulda never allowed them to have power without being fully arabnized, that was the arabs fault
The Ottoman Empire was a colonial power. It was the successor of the Roman Empire. The Ottomans made Arabs and Muslim youth fight and die for themselves, used those lands to collect taxes, but in return did not make any investments in those lands and those lands remained undeveloped. The Ottoman Empire turned its back on the Arabs and face to the West. It had Arab intellectuals killed so that they would not criticize the corrupt administration of the Empire, which had fallen into pleasure, debauchery and waste. When the Ottoman Empire had just arrived, the Arab geography was experiencing its golden age. It was ahead of its time in subjects such as Ethics, Science, Medicine, Astronomy, Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics and Geometry and enlightened Europe. However, the Ottomans misused this wealth and development and spent this power on pleasure with women in the palace. Using this power, the Ottomans bridged the sectarian differences among Muslims and took the Middle East behind the times, just like America does today. During the Ottoman period, CEOs had a privileged place in the administration. Today, if Islam is associated with terrorism and underdevelopment, the Ottoman Empire is most responsible for this. Arabs and Muslims gave power to the Ottoman Empire and a great responsibility fell to the Ottoman Empire, but the Ottoman Empire abused this power and misrepresented Islam. If we are in this situation today, it is not the fault of the Palestinians, but the fault of those who shirk their responsibility. Stop using the CEOnists' propaganda of blaming the Palestinians for everything.
As an Arab I agree, However Ottomans in the that time were not implementing shariah and overthro the Sultan rule and accepted western ideologies, so Islamically they have no rights to hold our lands until they implement Shariah and rule by Islam and throw all western ideologies out.
Greeting my brother. I am a Turk and we love him with all our hearts. He had the heart of a lion. He served his Caliph and the Ummah with Honour. He is at peace in the lands of a brother country. I wish to send my gratitude to you, your beautify country and your wonderful people. Selam Aleyküm my brother 🇹🇷❤️🇩🇿
His tomb is in Istanbul, Besiktas and was personally made by another legend Mimar Sinan in 1541 and from that day till this day, whenever an Ottoman or Turkish navy vessel goes on a mission. They first visit the Tomb of Barbaros Hayrettin pasha and perform a ÇİMARİVA greeting. (all soldiers stands next to each other side by side on the deck and salute his tomb) You can see this greeting in the video below, although the quality is very poor. ua-cam.com/video/QYUm428I3_c/v-deo.html
@@Isra-hl4jx thank you very much for your kind words brother. Oruç his brother is buried here. Turkey is a sister country for us. And the Ottoman sultans called our country “house of Djihâd” thanks to barbaros Pasha and his successors who made our country’s name so feared and respected. So I hope I can one day visit his tomb and kiss the green flag.
@@crispusallen3865 originally it was to tackle the threat of german empire. But then they "improvised" seeing that the ottoman empire jump into the war.
They did left him Hejaz, they just didn't wanted to give him Syria Palestine and Iraq. Rest of Arabia didn't mattered much to to British,except Aden in yemen
And for us from estern Europe otoman empaire It was in all our history a mess for 500 hundred years, rape crime........ 😷😷😷😷and so on. Do you know the realty about your history? You Muslim you know just to play the victim. You are more than 2 billions on that earth and you continued to cry that someone else don't let you develop someone else it's to blame. Your world it's full of crime, persecution of minority in the name of your religion throughout the history your of caliphate, and Islamic world . And most of you run towards West to find freedom, and in the same time you are destroying everything are good. Way? Because 90 %of your world it's illiterate and it's easy to be brainwashed from your boss. No one in that world it's without sin. Finished complain. When you complain you show weak.
@@nadeemahmed6596 Yeah if I'm not entirely mistaken, Syria was gone in 1920, Iraq was gone in the 1950s and Jordan is up next(they're already screwed rn)
Turks betrayed the ways of caliphate for centries, all they cared about was war. Arabs shoulda never allowed them to have power without being fully arabnized, that was the arabs fault
The Arabs thought they could deal with Brits (diplomatically) the same way they dealt with the Turks. They never knew how duplicitous and sociopathic the Anglosphere is; essentially protected from that reality by the Ottomans.
From the first months of the siege, Ottoman soldiers experienced serious difficulties in every aspect. Especially food and health facilities came to the point of depletion in a short time. So much so that when the garrison surrendered, the only food supplies passed to the Hashemite Army consisted of dates and dried locusts. However, despite all the negativities, garrison commander Fahrettin Pasha did not want to surrender due to the moral and spiritual values in line with the city of Medina, which is considered sacred by Muslims. Fahrettin pasha didnt surrendert even after the truce while they were still eating grasshopper
Turkish garrison of Medina didn't surrender to Hussein bin Ali, in fact they didn't even surrender when WW1 ended! They surrendered at 10 January 1919, 3 months after than Ottoman signed ceasefire agreement with Entente powers. While Ottoman government was silent, it was the new government in Ankara who pressured British to release them and they had to release the commander Fahrettin Pasha. He returned Anatolia and continued fighting against Entente powers in Turkish war of independence. It is again completely false young turks were Turkish nationalists and turkified Ottoman with liberal reforms, they were reformist conservatives and aimed to modernize Ottoman without touching its Caliphate at all. They replaced Sultan Abdulmahid because they believed his reforms weren't fundamental enough. This was why they were against Turkish revolutionaries later on, only a handful of them tried to join the new government in Ankara including Enver Pasha but they were rejected. Claiming those people were same and had same ideologies is just laughable at best, if you want to be successful do your research properly. Nobody in Ottoman regardless young turk Pashas nor ordinary Turkish soldiers had any intention to abandon Muslim lands to enemies. After Arab rebellion Turkish mindset changed and the new government in Ankara had one objective alone, liberating Turkish majority territories..
Young Turks were a Coalition of young dissidents who ended the sultanate of the Ottoman Empire. Consisting of college students and dissident soldiers, the group succeeded in 1908 in forcing Abdülhamid II to reinstitute the 1876 constitution and recall the legislature. The Young Turk era ended in 1918 with the war of independence. The subsequent Republic of Turkey inherited the political and social infrastructure of the Young Turk government. Young turks also had members in masonic logdes proving they were freemason and were clearly against Islam and had kufr in them. Young turks were clearly on kufr and fried to change islam same as how kafir government do today in non Muslim countries making them the worst of the lot.
@@Ibrahim-fh6kv So what ? Even though it was weak but it had a great influence . Empire or state that time thought twice before plotting against us . Our Ummah had a roof over head . Now look at us .
@@dyu4634nationalism was a Zionist invention... Before that you were either a Muslim, Christian, Jew, pagan... Ottomans started falling after introducing "Imperial Edict of Reorganization" in 1839 to curb nationalism but this had many flaws with moving away from sharia being the primary one... Turks themselves also succumbed to nationalism as it was spreading fast like cancer in Ottoman lands... However, to say what Arabs did was justified which is join team Zionist against Ottomans is very wrong... You don't eat your brothers flesh because you find him or yourself slowly returning to jāhilia...
The khalifa was a secular puppet ruled by the three pashas who forced turkification on Arabs and adopted western laws and abandoned sharia. History is not as simple as it seems
The colonialist west chose not too smart people in order to control them and if they dance out of order just a bit without compromise they easily replace them like with the Suud dynasty.
Every abominable hypocrite claims ancestral connection to the noble prophet. No wonder why Almighty Allah made it clear in the Qur'an that the messenger is not father to any of us.
Sharif was abandoned by the British because he appointed himself as Caliph. Sufis, who strongly fought Europeans throughout Muslim lands, along with the office of the Khalifa, have been the main opposition to imperial European rule in the East. Ibn Saud guaranteed the word Khalifa will be buried, never to return again, and his theology of a savage form of Wahhabi Islam, attacked Sufis theologically and physically. The backwardness of Wahhabism also was pleasing to the British because it justified the worldview of the savage Muslim, in contrast making European culture look more civilized. In other words, they hit the jackpot with Al Saud.
The Wahhabis were likely backed by the British, since there's no way a tiny little sect could win so much given their size. No different to American support of Al Qaeda and ISIS; they need the image of the savage muslim, so they pay for it.
There's no way the nutty Wahhabi sect could have won without Anglo support. They need the image of the barbaric Muslim, so they pay for it, and support it.
As a Turkish nationalist, I sometimes think this; A state like the United Kingdom should have been formed with Türkiye, Syria and Iraq.Because, as far as I know, the Arabs living in these regions did not participate in the Arab revolts.
No. There shouldn’t have been any division in the first place. Nationalism sucks. And it’s because of nationalists that we lost our honour. A nation is nothing without its faith.
Turks were the last ethnic group to rise to nationalism in the Ottoman Empire. Turkish nationalism was born as a reaction against the nationalist movements of other ethnic groups. The Young Turk movement was a response to this. The empire disintegrated when ethnic groups rebelled against the Ottoman Empire with nationalist sentiments. Turkish nationalism was instrumental in the liberation of today's Turkey.
What about ethnicity superiority over others. That is what's happening here in Afghanistan, millions perished because of that. I used to think ummah could unite us all, but i was wrong.
@@Ibrahim-fh6kvand its not because of ethinicity its money If a group of people are poor evrry body will treat them as inferior and this ethinicity gets connected to those people image
Selam to all my brothers and sisters. I hope at least we here can commit to learning from the mistakes of history and stop peddling petty tribalism or dry nationalism. There are excellent people and unfortunately toxic people (particularly among our current leaders) in all the countries of the Muslim world but we are one Ummah. We have to put our petty differences aside and act with one mind and body. This is what our enemies fear most and have been working so hard to prevent since the collapse of the caliphate. The absence if this is the situation we see today. Kings in lofty palaces worried about their self interest as our brothers and sisters in Gaza get massacred without mercy. United we have a chance to attain peace under the shadow of our joint swords. Divided we are nothing and not worthy of the legacy of the great people who came before us
The Britons/Lawrence of Arabia promised the Arabs a big empire in the Middle East. It was a fata morgana with a splinter in the middle called Israel. And since then the Arabs burned (and are still burning).
This is not just a simple story. This is too much to tell here. But shortly those kufar splitted the Ummah because it was the only way to win from The Ottoman Caliphate, and it is still happening today. They sell Palestine too , them own brothers are dying right know. But sorry i cant say that because it is a fake british ideology where they believing in.
There is fault from arab, there is fault in ottomans, there is fault from british. People is people, they are always make mistake. Higher ranking people mistake much more severe scars then average people. Learn and do better from them. Dont betray fellow moslem. Dont involve your country in war for no reason. Never think your race better than others. And dont be kafr.
The question never asked is why the Ottomans attacked and conquered islamic countries? In 1558 they attacked The Kingdom of Morocco with their Algerian allies but the Moroccans won in the battle of Wadi Laban! I have a lot of Turkisch friends in The Netherlands and know they are pride people. What would they do if the Arabs where the ones who conquered Ottoman lands and ruled over them?
I don't care who's right or wrong one thing is for sure we've lost our honor and security since the last khilafa... Please Muslims lets bring it back in some shape or form
After Sultan Abdulhamid, the Ottoman administration was in the hands of pashas who were under European influence at that time. They tried to implement Turkish nationalism in some Arab geography. Like Cemal Pasha in Syria. However, when Yavuz Sultan Selim conquered Egypt, one of his pashas said, "We took Egypt from the Circassians and gave it to the Circassians again." Yavuz Sultan Selim executed that pasha. Because he was causing mischief of nationalism. With love to all my Muslim brothers from Turkey. Nationalism is a fitnah that divides the ummah. Let's be alert.
My country Turkiye has many times proposed that we muslims establish a peace keeping force and have our selves established in bases in Jordan and the region, but Arab countries have so far succummed to foreign pressures and not accepted such an offer, as yet. To all the Arab brothers and sisters; without falling out of Islamic etiquitte and manners, and without endangering yourselves or others, please rally your leaders/governments, so we can get together and do what's needed to stop all this, ...condemnation, throwing an aid pallet or two from airplanes and posing for the cameras for the media isn't right, we need to establish a peace keeping force to stop the brutality. We need to show a steady force, we need to first unite, please don't just watch, be active in your countries.... ....and all nations can join in on this peace keeping force, from all corners of the world, all beliefs, because this is about SANITY against INSANITY
EVERYONE please make a playlist about Palestine like I have (4th playlist) and ask others to have such a playlist. Or copy directly the list I have and ask others to copy it from you, and they ask others copy from them. We need to spread the truth, millions, billions of us.
In fact, the Turkification didn't alienate the Arabs. It is just the other way around. The alienation of the Balkan People killed the idea of Ottomanizm first, giving way to rise of Islamizim. Then the alienation of the Arabs killed the idea of Islamizim and gived way to Turkification. That was the only ideology left, to save the independence of the state, leaning on the turkish population and to focus saving the turkish majority lands, which is called "Misak-i Milli". As Mustafa Kemal Pasha back then stated: "Turkish boys will not die for the Arabian deserts anymore."
Hussein bin Ali might have the best intentions, but being sides with British to revolt fellow-religionists is never a good idea. British have used him to divide Syria, and Iraq, and Hijazz, and after he is done doing it, he was just kicked out to be replaced by a worse version of him. I wonder how his time at thie exile went by.
Should I like and help the Arab countries people that betrayed my ancestors back then even tho there's many sahih Hadith about 2 muslims fighting each other etc? Im not a nationalist but after watching this I honestly like Arabs way less than I already used to.
The average Arab is not your enemy. The average Muslim, Arab or non-Arab, is your brother. Remember what the Prophet (SAW) said in his last sermon. Not an Arab over a non-Arab or a non-Arab over an Arab. It might feel hard sometimes, but avoid being racist. The main leaders may be silent but there are many, many Arabs sacrificing their money and lives for p@les.tine right now. The actions of their traitorous ancestors are not on their hands. May Allah help unite all the Muslims. We need unity now. The tides are turning. We have to grab this wave that the Arab p@les.tinians are sacrificing their lives for, partly to open our eyes and realize that coming back to Islam is the only solution. And coming back to Islam means abandoning racism. Don't become the monster you fight.
2 things that should have happened. 1st: sultan Abdul Hamid II should quashed the the Young Turks rebellion. Which was European and atheistic in its essence. That way there was no betrayal within the sultanate itself. 2nd: The Sharif should have never betrayed the ummah by aligning with the British. The British did not want the continuation of the caliphate.
Ottoman empire was dead anyway. Since 18th century, it was bad. They declared themselves as caliphate, but in reality, ordinary monarchy, which was super power until 1700s.
I don't think the revolt was unjustified. I think his cooperation with the imperialists is what made him the villain. "Let's throw away our shackles with the help of the imperialist" yeah that never happened.
first of all the young turks did not dethrone the sultan it was ittihad terraki with enver pasha as leader, secons they did not want turkification they wanted to unite all turksto fight the oppressors and make a unified turkic islamic nation with emphasis on islamic, third you religious people who follow everything blindly should stop talking turkish history you know nothing but propaganda
they are young turks. there is not even single turk with in them but the brand name is young turks and İtthiadcı is just with different brand name for the same lobby. they had no relation to islam whatsoever. their founding members are freemasons. and they were western tools openly and publically. they are an embarrassment. today they live their lives as "chp zihniyeti" and think they are gonna be rich when they get into EU and tries to turn country into Ukraine.
What wrong with religious people? The very reason Allah SWT willed the dismantling of the Ottoman Empire is because it went further and further away from its Islamic principles.
And that's how this man ensured the decline of Ottoman empire and have a lasting effect on the Muslim Ummah. Since this was the watershed moment that ultimately led to the unending problems of the Middle East
@@MiaMaraa you missed the point. Hasan son of Ali reign for 6 months before he gave up for Umayyad. the Sharifate of mecca are supposed descendent of Hassan. Sharif Hussein, after the fall of Ottoman Caliphate, he declared new Caliphate in Mecca but he last a Caliph for 6 months because of Saudi attacks and war..
@@Era_Of_Awakeningwhy dont you guys understand Hussein and this and that Doesnt matter Ummah did it was supossed To hell with this hussein and hassan We are here now becaue of all that stupid infighitng for two losrs who got their heads cut off and no hassan and hussein are not any prohphet so they cant be considered religious figure They are historical figure So dont try make your own cult on based this two losers
Muslim ruler?who? The last Muslim ruler was Abdulhamid who was overthrown in 1908. After that,ottoman state was ruled by a westernised YounG Turk kids who thought they could reform the empire but failed. There's a reason why Armenians,Kurds Arabs all rebelled
As a Muslim Turk, I would like to say that the Ottoman Empire became very corrupt during this man's time, during the nationalism movement and the tanzimat period. Look at the man called Mahmud II, for example, he was the one who made wearing a fez a law (obligation) and introduced some secular systems into the state. In our opinion, he was the ‘Gavur Padishah’. Gavur means infidel. During the reign of Abdulhamid II, he was often subjected to fitna due to parasites within the state. When these parasites brought him down, they brought the old sultan, who did not understand the state affairs, to power and destroyed the state by putting the state into the 1st world war. Remember this; the reason for this man's rebellion may have been unjust, but the British were not so simple, they broke their promises against the possibility that this man would increase his relations with Turkey, which was the continuation of the Ottoman Empire after the war, and placed the ancestor of the House of Saud. For example, Gertrude Bell was the one who destroyed the Ottoman Empire, she created more than 20 countries out of the caliphate, she was the teacher of Lawrence of Arabia. Whenever she entered Muslim lands, she would cover herself and speak as if she was one of them. Lawrence has a saying: ‘I was so carried away that sometimes I was praying evening prayers when no one was there.' Do you see the hypocrites? For me, the most vivid story is the story of Abdulhamid. He is a paranoid man (as it is), he does not trust anyone around him (parasites), but one day he learns about a man in a town who has knowledge of hundreds of hadiths and has lived there for years. After testing him, he calls him to him one night and the man he brought in describes it like this; ‘’The sultan called me to him and I hurriedly went to him. when they took me to the palace, he was on the balcony, his back was turned to me, he turned to me and showed me a list ‘’the list of agents he had exposed‘’, he counted the names of each of them, I waited for my name, he hugged me and said words expressing his trust, he poured his tears on my shoulder. when he finished counting names in the list, I understood that the sultan couldn't have exposed me‘’ Arminius Vambery (British Spy) And the sultan unfortunetly give him the most mahram(private) information of the state. Our saddest and weakest period indeed... If you look at the wars of the last century and mark them, you will see that you have drawn the borders of the last caliphate, that is, the Ottoman Empire.
We must say one thing about the YoungTurks…The head of them Enver Pasha was a pro islamist but the process pushed him to Turkic ideology…Turcification didnt emerge abruptly…it came as opposed to armenian and different balcan ethnic groups’ revolts that bring about many killings of civillian Turks in the villages by these groups…
There are multiple errors in your video. First of all, turkification was only applied in the region called Anatolia. The Ottomans did not interfere with the internal affairs of the Arabian Peninsula, they only appointed governors, collected taxes and requested soldiers during jihad. And the seeking for independence & uprisings in the Balkans were long before the coup of the Young Turks and were generally supported by Russia. For example, Greece declared its independence long before the Young Turks. The Ottoman Empire lost a lot of blood in the Balkans and Europe in the last century. After the French revolution, every nation in the Balkans began to revolt. The Ottomans lost many martyrs to suppress the rebellions. Essentially, the Young Turks were aware that the empire was deteriorating and they could not stop the disintegration, so they had no choice but turkification to protect Anatolia, where a large part of the population was Turkish, against such uprisings. This includes the Armenian deportation. Because Armenian gangs raided many Turkish villages in Eastern Anatolia and massacred the Turks, many mass graves belonging to the Turks were found. At that moment there was no choice other than turkification. Then the Ottoman Empire entered the First World War and became even weaker. Many Turkish soldiers were martyred to suppress the British-backed Arab uprising. Don't forget Fahreddin Pasha, who endured the siege with his soldiers, hungry and thirsty, to protect the holy lands. After all, there has been no peace in the Balkans or the Middle East for years!
Nice, it’s good to know that in the same way that Zionists have lost their memories past October 7th, the Muslims have lost their memories past 1948. Let’s always remember that nationalism is the reason of all the trouble in the Middle East, not the West!
It is always important for powers that are to support credible and responsible oppositions over irresponsible and incompetent ones even if that has potential of creating new challenges. Out of all Arab people the Hashemites have been in my eyes the most respectable lots of people. When I make that statement what comes to the picture in my memory are thr few people I had seen of surname Hashmi and I am assuming they have some connection to Hashemites. However, while discussing this I would also like to stress again on the fact that a competent, responsible group of people mixing with or leading an incompetent, irreponsible lot will always create a dicy situation, so it is not only important to decide on the best opposition but also on the best allies or best team. Obviously the Al-sauds had betrayed Hussain and probably that saga is still continuing. On the part of the British it also shows continuous positions in power can also erode at human capabilities of people and make them unwise. Fast forward to 20th century and this was again proved when America failed to support a credible leadership change by backing Mikhail Gorbachev more vigorously during the transition period over Boris Yeltsin and that has already cost us the Ukraine war and lives of many people. Lest people think I am putting the blame on americans and british actually I am not, i am just stressing the wisdom of giving importance to responsible people within ones team and allies as well as in the iopposition , those choices turn out to be important factors during crucial situations, this also brings to light the fact that human beings with power can also become vulnerable to mistakes costing lots as when without power, the temptations to travel the easiest path will always be there and probably will be the most dicy one. Remember history shows lot of good examples of that. One of which is my particular favorite. Alexander the Great had given back the Kingdom of the defeated rival King Porus of Indus river region in respect for Porus's bravery and I think I read that Porus provided valuable service as an ally of Alexander subsequently.
The question is should the ottoman empire under the control of a freemason named mustafa kamal attaturk who gave jews the permission to settle in palestine be considered the ottoman empire? I think it was the zionist puppet republic of turkey disguised under the name of the ottoman empire... Ottoman empire died way back in 1909 after mustafa kamal attaturk organised a military coup against the last real ottoman sultan abdul hamid R.A. so the arabs didn't revolt against the ottomans they revolted against the zionist puppet attaturk who did everything in his power to erase islam from turkey...
ingilizlerle birlik olup osmanlıya karşı isyan edip savaşan araplarda suç yok öyle mi? o senin yerlere göklere sığdıramadığın abdülhamid osmanlı topraklarının yarısından fazlasını sarayında otururken verdi. Sarayından çıkmadı bile. O küfür ettiğin atatürk cepheden cepheye koştu. bunları neden söylemiyorsun? İşiniz günüz yalan dolan.
I would normally say any land would want independence, but to believe that the British and the French are looking out for your best interest is just stupid.
@@verilyze independence from the Turks. That’s why I said normally it would have been fine, but the fact that he only fought the Turks believing that the British and the French are going to grant him independence was stupid.
He was decieved to betray the ottomans offered a poisoned sweet to blemish his credibility,well history has judged him already may Allah forgive and mercy on his soul after all he was just a human bound by weakness and flaws.
Ottoman lost its grace when they started following the Europeans. It was Khalifate in name. The literally adopted their constitution from the Napoleonic Code in 1858 not from Sharia.
One clear and known fact is that whenever a question or a personal thought is written as a headline in a newspaper or a youtube video (as of now and here). The answer is no and not. Dear gentlemen the Sherifs of Makkah are friends of Ottomans and not subjects, so there are no treason in this situation, and afterall the only one was open for realtions with the Ottomans is the wise Sherif Hussain, Hijaz state is considered a special state that is not controled by the Ottomans and never and if there was treasons of Ottomans go look who are the traitors from their subjects not the Sherifs. The Sherifate of Makkah is a higher rank than any rank more the Sultan and they knew it. Read history and understand the facts before posting here and there and before all respect yourself as the land will not respect your rotten body when you will be buried under it.
We're a small but dedicated team on a mission to provide free access to educational content. If you find our content valuable, please support us by subscribing, liking, and sharing our videos. Your engagement makes all the difference!
Young Turks were Donmeh. These were Jews or Crypto Jews who pretended to be Muslims converted but they didn’t convert. These Donmeh installed Arabs Jews to rule Gulf countries.
The Ottoman were compromised. Majority of their leaders were Donmeh.
Exactly 💯
It's excellent to be part of the team 👏
Please support us 🙏 by following 🙏
He didn’t just betray the ottomans. But the entire Ummah!
Turks treated them like third class citizens
@@mr.o8539 total bullshit, we send trains full of gold to hejaz every fking year, we didnt touch their language, their culture, all we told them was, we are brothers, but they went with nationalism and took away al quds from the entire ummah by betraying the khalifa, so dont come up here with your third class citizen bullshit, we treated you as equals or even better then the Turks in anatolia, and you guys behaved like total animals towards us
@@mr.o8539 you brainwashed
@@mr.o8539 where? Did we change your language? Did we change your culture? Did we force you to do things you didn't want? Now you are not governed by the Turks and you live as first class citizens in Syria, Iraq and Palestine. Congratulations
@@pricemavili9006 🫡 reply was awesome 👌
If your rebellion is supported by Brits, it is not your rebellion anymore. You are a mere puppet in their play…
Lol and the turks were supported by the germans
And if the other side is supported by the brits and germans and etc, then it is not a side to call any act against a rebel. Writing before reading is funny isn't it?!
@@Sharifammarofmakkah what do you mean by the other side is supported by british? Brits have devastated the ottoman empire
They also devastated the arabs @emiryalcn8922
@@emiryalcn8922 True, all for oil.
His betrayal only harmed his own Arab brethren to this day
Turks betrayed the ways of caliphate for centries, all they cared about was war. Arabs shoulda never allowed them to have power without being fully arabnized, that was the arabs fault
Turks betrayed the arabs by trying to make them fight the 3 biggest empires in the world at the time
How?
@@bo6be3 how what?
@@bo6be3 every trouble in the Middle East due to this betrayal if this didn’t happened ME would’ve been more stable and prosperous
and since then we see the results today
Nationalism is the great curse of our Ummah
@@Wailky2008 you can keep your Ummah. Turks aren’t part of that pan-Arabian fantasy.
@@Wailky2008 tell that to young turks at that time, and now.
The Ottoman Empire was a colonial power. It was the successor of the Roman Empire. The Ottomans made Arabs and Muslim youth fight and die for themselves, used those lands to collect taxes, but in return did not make any investments in those lands and those lands remained undeveloped. The Ottoman Empire turned its back on the Arabs and face to the West. It had Arab intellectuals killed so that they would not criticize the corrupt administration of the Empire, which had fallen into pleasure, debauchery and waste. When the Ottoman Empire had just arrived, the Arab geography was experiencing its golden age. It was ahead of its time in subjects such as Ethics, Science, Medicine, Astronomy, Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics and Geometry and enlightened Europe. However, the Ottomans misused this wealth and development and spent this power on pleasure with women in the palace. Using this power, the Ottomans bridged the sectarian differences among Muslims and took the Middle East behind the times, just like America does today. During the Ottoman period, CEOs had a privileged place in the administration. Today, if Islam is associated with terrorism and underdevelopment, the Ottoman Empire is most responsible for this. Arabs and Muslims gave power to the Ottoman Empire and a great responsibility fell to the Ottoman Empire, but the Ottoman Empire abused this power and misrepresented Islam. If we are in this situation today, it is not the fault of the Palestinians, but the fault of those who shirk their responsibility. Stop using the CEOnists' propaganda of blaming the Palestinians for everything.
As an Arab I agree, However Ottomans in the that time were not implementing shariah and overthro the Sultan rule and accepted western ideologies, so Islamically they have no rights to hold our lands until they implement Shariah and rule by Islam and throw all western ideologies out.
Palestinian blood is on his hands...
no is not justmind your own shit
Not really
Yes.. agree. What happened now in Palestine is one of his betrayal effect. Shame!
@@joahua122sound personal
@@joahua122wahhabi dog
Greetings from Algeria to Turkey, I hope one day i can visit the tomb of our first king, Barbaros Hayreddin Pasha
Greeting my brother. I am a Turk and we love him with all our hearts. He had the heart of a lion. He served his Caliph and the Ummah with Honour. He is at peace in the lands of a brother country. I wish to send my gratitude to you, your beautify country and your wonderful people. Selam Aleyküm my brother 🇹🇷❤️🇩🇿
His tomb is in Istanbul, Besiktas and was personally made by another legend Mimar Sinan in 1541 and from that day till this day, whenever an Ottoman or Turkish navy vessel goes on a mission. They first visit the Tomb of Barbaros Hayrettin pasha and perform a ÇİMARİVA greeting. (all soldiers stands next to each other side by side on the deck and salute his tomb)
You can see this greeting in the video below, although the quality is very poor.
ua-cam.com/video/QYUm428I3_c/v-deo.html
@@Isra-hl4jx thank you very much for your kind words brother. Oruç his brother is buried here. Turkey is a sister country for us. And the Ottoman sultans called our country “house of Djihâd” thanks to barbaros Pasha and his successors who made our country’s name so feared and respected. So I hope I can one day visit his tomb and kiss the green flag.
🐺🇩🇿🤝🇹🇷🐺
He is not a king but vassal of Turkish Empire, may he rest in peace
He was played by the brits and the French. It doesn’t get simpler than this.
And the turks were played by the germans
@@closetglobe.IRGUN.NW0and the British
Ww1 was to dismantle the khilafat system
@@crispusallen3865 lol ottomans were irrelevant
@@crispusallen3865 originally it was to tackle the threat of german empire. But then they "improvised" seeing that the ottoman empire jump into the war.
Hussein Bin Ali: I want to be a king
🇬🇧: what a nice idea, we support you
Hussein Bein Ali: I succeeded
🇬🇧: very well, your time is up
They did left him Hejaz, they just didn't wanted to give him Syria Palestine and Iraq. Rest of Arabia didn't mattered much to to British,except Aden in yemen
Turkification was only instituted in the Anatolian Provinces of the Empire. Syrian, Hejazi and Iraqi Vilayets were not subjected to Turkification.
Keep buying these lies.
@@nathanielmartins5930 He is telling the truth, why did you write this ridiculous answer??
@@alparslanerylmaz
Because what he said is plain and simply false.
@@nathanielmartins5930The only explanation is that your great-grandfathers made up this fact because it was against their own interests.
@@nathanielmartins5930max euro
This content is one of the most important topics but unfortunately completely underrated.
The British/colonialism are the core of all problems in history.
And for us from estern Europe otoman empaire It was in all our history a mess for 500 hundred years, rape crime........ 😷😷😷😷and so on. Do you know the realty about your history? You Muslim you know just to play the victim. You are more than 2 billions on that earth and you continued to cry that someone else don't let you develop someone else it's to blame. Your world it's full of crime, persecution of minority in the name of your religion throughout the history your of caliphate, and Islamic world . And most of you run towards West to find freedom, and in the same time you are destroying everything are good. Way? Because 90 %of your world it's illiterate and it's easy to be brainwashed from your boss. No one in that world it's without sin. Finished complain. When you complain you show weak.
And his three sons became the kings of Jordan, Syria and Iraq. Current kings/rulers of these 3 countries are descendants of him, the great traitor.
and his sons are traitors too. apple never fell far from the tree
@@BOZ_11Nah king Faisal of Iraq is goated
Well they are out of Iraq and Syria only Jordan left to go
@@nadeemahmed6596 Yeah if I'm not entirely mistaken, Syria was gone in 1920, Iraq was gone in the 1950s and Jordan is up next(they're already screwed rn)
He was a traitor 🤮
Turks betrayed the ways of caliphate for centries, all they cared about was war. Arabs shoulda never allowed them to have power without being fully arabnized, that was the arabs fault
Lol turkeys fault for choosing to war with the 3 biggest empires in the world
@@closetglobe.IRGUN.NW0you think they wouldnt attack turks
@@closetglobe.IRGUN.NW0 Of course you support the Irgun
@@user-us7el6ss2l no. It's just pretty.
I used to have a hakenkreuz
I feel sorry for the Turkish youngs who gave their lives to maintain order in that desert.
Ayidan post araptan dost olmaz
yea i feel bad for the poor arabs who were forced to add innovations to islam
Ayidan post araptan dost olmaz
@@EdwardFishington says the one who calls himself edward, change your name first back to normal before you start talking about innovations
@@alperenbaytimur oh no a name i made almost 2 years ago what ever will i do ?
Betraying a Muslim in favor on a non-Muslim is not justified.
The Arabs thought they could deal with Brits (diplomatically) the same way they dealt with the Turks. They never knew how duplicitous and sociopathic the Anglosphere is; essentially protected from that reality by the Ottomans.
From the first months of the siege, Ottoman soldiers experienced serious difficulties in every aspect. Especially food and health facilities came to the point of depletion in a short time. So much so that when the garrison surrendered, the only food supplies passed to the Hashemite Army consisted of dates and dried locusts. However, despite all the negativities, garrison commander Fahrettin Pasha did not want to surrender due to the moral and spiritual values in line with the city of Medina, which is considered sacred by Muslims.
Fahrettin pasha didnt surrendert even after the truce while they were still eating grasshopper
Brave men. They all were, may they rest in peace.
A traitor.
Turkish garrison of Medina didn't surrender to Hussein bin Ali, in fact they didn't even surrender when WW1 ended! They surrendered at 10 January 1919, 3 months after than Ottoman signed ceasefire agreement with Entente powers. While Ottoman government was silent, it was the new government in Ankara who pressured British to release them and they had to release the commander Fahrettin Pasha. He returned Anatolia and continued fighting against Entente powers in Turkish war of independence.
It is again completely false young turks were Turkish nationalists and turkified Ottoman with liberal reforms, they were reformist conservatives and aimed to modernize Ottoman without touching its Caliphate at all. They replaced Sultan Abdulmahid because they believed his reforms weren't fundamental enough. This was why they were against Turkish revolutionaries later on, only a handful of them tried to join the new government in Ankara including Enver Pasha but they were rejected. Claiming those people were same and had same ideologies is just laughable at best, if you want to be successful do your research properly. Nobody in Ottoman regardless young turk Pashas nor ordinary Turkish soldiers had any intention to abandon Muslim lands to enemies. After Arab rebellion Turkish mindset changed and the new government in Ankara had one objective alone, liberating Turkish majority territories..
Young Turks were a Coalition of young dissidents who ended the sultanate of the Ottoman Empire. Consisting of college students and dissident soldiers, the group succeeded in 1908 in forcing Abdülhamid II to reinstitute the 1876 constitution and recall the legislature. The Young Turk era ended in 1918 with the war of independence. The subsequent Republic of Turkey inherited the political and social infrastructure of the Young Turk government. Young turks also had members in masonic logdes proving they were freemason and were clearly against Islam and had kufr in them. Young turks were clearly on kufr and fried to change islam same as how kafir government do today in non Muslim countries making them the worst of the lot.
@@abdullahassaffah We Turks have no problem with the Young Turks, we love and respect them very much.
@@enessanadine1 Dont talk behalf of all Turks
@@mostafamchet7733 which one should i believe. were the young turks on the side of islam and the caliphate or not. what do you believe brother?
@@mostafamchet7733 Those who do not respect the Young Turks are not ''Turks'' in the first place, so I cannot speak on their behalf. Don't worry
Absolutely Nothing justifies going against khilafah .
The khilafah was already weak since late 1600s
@@Ibrahim-fh6kv So what ? Even though it was weak but it had a great influence . Empire or state that time thought twice before plotting against us . Our Ummah had a roof over head . Now look at us .
@@dyu4634nationalism was a Zionist invention... Before that you were either a Muslim, Christian, Jew, pagan...
Ottomans started falling after introducing "Imperial Edict of Reorganization" in 1839 to curb nationalism but this had many flaws with moving away from sharia being the primary one... Turks themselves also succumbed to nationalism as it was spreading fast like cancer in Ottoman lands... However, to say what Arabs did was justified which is join team Zionist against Ottomans is very wrong... You don't eat your brothers flesh because you find him or yourself slowly returning to jāhilia...
The khalifa was a secular puppet ruled by the three pashas who forced turkification on Arabs and adopted western laws and abandoned sharia. History is not as simple as it seems
They are not Arabs they cant be a khilafah
He was far from being smart he got himself just used..
The colonialist west chose not too smart people in order to control them and if they dance out of order just a bit without compromise they easily replace them like with the Suud dynasty.
Every abominable hypocrite claims ancestral connection to the noble prophet. No wonder why Almighty Allah made it clear in the Qur'an that the messenger is not father to any of us.
From his daughter and Ali
That is my fav, thanks again for always enlightening us 👏👏👏👏👏👏
Sharif was abandoned by the British because he appointed himself as Caliph. Sufis, who strongly fought Europeans throughout Muslim lands, along with the office of the Khalifa, have been the main opposition to imperial European rule in the East. Ibn Saud guaranteed the word Khalifa will be buried, never to return again, and his theology of a savage form of Wahhabi Islam, attacked Sufis theologically and physically. The backwardness of Wahhabism also was pleasing to the British because it justified the worldview of the savage Muslim, in contrast making European culture look more civilized. In other words, they hit the jackpot with Al Saud.
Strong and on point words.
The Wahhabis were likely backed by the British, since there's no way a tiny little sect could win so much given their size. No different to American support of Al Qaeda and ISIS; they need the image of the savage muslim, so they pay for it.
Ottomans werent sufis. That is wahabi propaganda.
There's no way the nutty Wahhabi sect could have won without Anglo support. They need the image of the barbaric Muslim, so they pay for it, and support it.
Gtfo, you didnt know anyshit. Keep believing this wahabi nonsense. Wahabism is created by the britisch spy hempher.
Today his great great grandson is the king of Jordan.
Jordan used their air defences recently to protect Israel from the Iranian missile/drone attack. The biggest joke of a country
long live the king
@@joahua122 🤮🤮🤮
yes, the man who helped israel's air defence 🤷♂🤷♂🤣🤣
@@BOZ_11 He’s a sellout.
Still muslims counting and witnesses the cost of betrayal
what cost of it? arabs having a country after a hundred years getting killed?
The situation was the same that day and same today. Only thing changed is the existence of Israel,which is due to WORLD WAR2 ,not one
As a Turkish nationalist, I sometimes think this; A state like the United Kingdom should have been formed with Türkiye, Syria and Iraq.Because, as far as I know, the Arabs living in these regions did not participate in the Arab revolts.
owww, dont say that "arabs, revolted, backstabbed us". niye böyle şeyleri sürekli söyleyip duruyorlar ağ. hele ki hele şuan gazzede soykırım varken ?
No. There shouldn’t have been any division in the first place. Nationalism sucks. And it’s because of nationalists that we lost our honour. A nation is nothing without its faith.
I am Turkish too. Turks gained a lot of honor with Islam. We need to help all the Muslims.
The revolt is actually the fault of your kind; nationalists
@@Dem1DerTell that to arab nationalists 😂
my guy thought he could trust the british
Turks were the last ethnic group to rise to nationalism in the Ottoman Empire. Turkish nationalism was born as a reaction against the nationalist movements of other ethnic groups. The Young Turk movement was a response to this. The empire disintegrated when ethnic groups rebelled against the Ottoman Empire with nationalist sentiments. Turkish nationalism was instrumental in the liberation of today's Turkey.
I would disagree. Turkic elites were already adopting western ideas by that time
The ottomans never fought against arabs. They left arabs to their devises.
This is fantastic work❤
Glad you think so!
Nationalism is the greatest sedition inflicted on this ummah.
What about ethnicity superiority over others. That is what's happening here in Afghanistan, millions perished because of that. I used to think ummah could unite us all, but i was wrong.
@@Ibrahim-fh6kvand its not because of ethinicity its money
If a group of people are poor evrry body will treat them as inferior and this ethinicity gets connected to those people image
@@Ibrahim-fh6kv Afghanistan's plight is administered by the Americans
Greed too
@@BOZ_11 It was long screwed, The Soviet invasion triggered it
Selam to all my brothers and sisters. I hope at least we here can commit to learning from the mistakes of history and stop peddling petty tribalism or dry nationalism. There are excellent people and unfortunately toxic people (particularly among our current leaders) in all the countries of the Muslim world but we are one Ummah. We have to put our petty differences aside and act with one mind and body. This is what our enemies fear most and have been working so hard to prevent since the collapse of the caliphate. The absence if this is the situation we see today. Kings in lofty palaces worried about their self interest as our brothers and sisters in Gaza get massacred without mercy. United we have a chance to attain peace under the shadow of our joint swords. Divided we are nothing and not worthy of the legacy of the great people who came before us
Can you imagine what sin he commited!?!
What about the Saudi family, they betrayed too and stayed loyal to their British puppet
That nomad was harami
How unfortunate is a person who hails from prophets family and then betrayed whole ummah
The Britons/Lawrence of Arabia promised the Arabs a big empire in the Middle East. It was a fata morgana with a splinter in the middle called Israel. And since then the Arabs burned (and are still burning).
This is not just a simple story. This is too much to tell here. But shortly those kufar splitted the Ummah because it was the only way to win from The Ottoman Caliphate, and it is still happening today. They sell Palestine too , them own brothers are dying right know. But sorry i cant say that because it is a fake british ideology where they believing in.
This was really good, Very short and concise.
I'm sure hours could be made on causes and strategies and allegiances that took place.
great episode
your videos are amazing man
The british changing their mind about him mightve been due to him not signing the treaty of Versailles, which the british demanded him to.
Turkish nationalism is the latest,,,,greece,,balkan Armenian arab nationalism triggered tge turkish nationalism
Now see what they got out of it.
tears and bloodshed ever since..
There is fault from arab, there is fault in ottomans, there is fault from british. People is people, they are always make mistake. Higher ranking people mistake much more severe scars then average people. Learn and do better from them. Dont betray fellow moslem. Dont involve your country in war for no reason. Never think your race better than others. And dont be kafr.
The worst betrayal in human history, so much so that the consequences are still present to this day mainly in Gaza.
That's because of WW2,not one
We where played like dolls and still are been played
He was preparing to revolt long before ww1, and much earlier than 1916.
His advisors were the ones who suggested to ally with the british.
Who were his advisors?
Nodbody is saying british was solely to blame its just he was a trash
The question never asked is why the Ottomans attacked and conquered islamic countries?
In 1558 they attacked The Kingdom of Morocco with their Algerian allies but the Moroccans won in the battle of Wadi Laban!
I have a lot of Turkisch friends in The Netherlands and know they are pride people. What would they do if the Arabs where the ones who conquered Ottoman lands and ruled over them?
The prophet Muhammad pbuh said .. nationalism is not in Islam.... this was the start and this is why we are so divided today....
Great video
I don't care who's right or wrong one thing is for sure we've lost our honor and security since the last khilafa... Please Muslims lets bring it back in some shape or form
After Sultan Abdulhamid, the Ottoman administration was in the hands of pashas who were under European influence at that time. They tried to implement Turkish nationalism in some Arab geography. Like Cemal Pasha in Syria. However, when Yavuz Sultan Selim conquered Egypt, one of his pashas said, "We took Egypt from the Circassians and gave it to the Circassians again." Yavuz Sultan Selim executed that pasha. Because he was causing mischief of nationalism. With love to all my Muslim brothers from Turkey. Nationalism is a fitnah that divides the ummah. Let's be alert.
My country Turkiye has many times proposed that we muslims establish a peace keeping force and have our selves established in bases in Jordan and the region, but Arab countries have so far succummed to foreign pressures and not accepted such an offer, as yet.
To all the Arab brothers and sisters; without falling out of Islamic etiquitte and manners, and without endangering yourselves or others, please rally your leaders/governments, so we can get together and do what's needed to stop all this,
...condemnation, throwing an aid pallet or two from airplanes and posing for the cameras for the media isn't right, we need to establish a peace keeping force to stop the brutality.
We need to show a steady force, we need to first unite, please don't just watch, be active in your countries....
....and all nations can join in on this peace keeping force, from all corners of the world, all beliefs,
because this is about SANITY against INSANITY
EVERYONE please make a playlist about Palestine like I have (4th playlist) and ask others to have such a playlist.
Or copy directly the list I have and ask others to copy it from you, and they ask others copy from them.
We need to spread the truth, millions, billions of us.
Turkey Is A Secular Country Aiding NATO. You're All The Same...
rally our leaders? our leaders are too busy killing us and if we so much as breathe they send us behind the moon...
He is going to answer
Today playing the Same Game by partnering with the U.S.
In fact, the Turkification didn't alienate the Arabs. It is just the other way around. The alienation of the Balkan People killed the idea of Ottomanizm first, giving way to rise of Islamizim. Then the alienation of the Arabs killed the idea of Islamizim and gived way to Turkification. That was the only ideology left, to save the independence of the state, leaning on the turkish population and to focus saving the turkish majority lands, which is called "Misak-i Milli". As Mustafa Kemal Pasha back then stated: "Turkish boys will not die for the Arabian deserts anymore."
There was also a norhern group of seperatists which was collabrating with France, but Cemal Pasha managed to prevent it before things escalated.
Ata Turk was a tool.
Don't think he's entirely to blame. Everyone was backstabbing each other. Wanting power.
Hussein bin Ali might have the best intentions, but being sides with British to revolt fellow-religionists is never a good idea. British have used him to divide Syria, and Iraq, and Hijazz, and after he is done doing it, he was just kicked out to be replaced by a worse version of him. I wonder how his time at thie exile went by.
Should I like and help the Arab countries people that betrayed my ancestors back then even tho there's many sahih Hadith about 2 muslims fighting each other etc? Im not a nationalist but after watching this I honestly like Arabs way less than I already used to.
The average Arab is not your enemy. The average Muslim, Arab or non-Arab, is your brother. Remember what the Prophet (SAW) said in his last sermon. Not an Arab over a non-Arab or a non-Arab over an Arab. It might feel hard sometimes, but avoid being racist. The main leaders may be silent but there are many, many Arabs sacrificing their money and lives for p@les.tine right now. The actions of their traitorous ancestors are not on their hands. May Allah help unite all the Muslims. We need unity now. The tides are turning. We have to grab this wave that the Arab p@les.tinians are sacrificing their lives for, partly to open our eyes and realize that coming back to Islam is the only solution. And coming back to Islam means abandoning racism. Don't become the monster you fight.
2 things that should have happened.
1st: sultan Abdul Hamid II should quashed the the Young Turks rebellion. Which was European and atheistic in its essence. That way there was no betrayal within the sultanate itself.
2nd: The Sharif should have never betrayed the ummah by aligning with the British. The British did not want the continuation of the caliphate.
Ottoman empire was dead anyway. Since 18th century, it was bad. They declared themselves as caliphate, but in reality, ordinary monarchy, which was super power until 1700s.
I don't think the revolt was unjustified. I think his cooperation with the imperialists is what made him the villain.
"Let's throw away our shackles with the help of the imperialist" yeah that never happened.
It's so heart breaking how once mighty Muslims who were the super powers fell pray to the schemes of Disbelievers 😢
He provoked by Lawrence of Arabia
Alhamdulilah ada juga anak melayu kita ingat pada sejarah.
Their grandchildren are paying the price for their betrayal. For example, Palestine
first of all the young turks did not dethrone the sultan it was ittihad terraki with enver pasha as leader, secons they did not want turkification they wanted to unite all turksto fight the oppressors and make a unified turkic islamic nation with emphasis on islamic, third you religious people who follow everything blindly should stop talking turkish history you know nothing but propaganda
they are young turks. there is not even single turk with in them but the brand name is young turks and İtthiadcı is just with different brand name for the same lobby. they had no relation to islam whatsoever. their founding members are freemasons. and they were western tools openly and publically. they are an embarrassment. today they live their lives as "chp zihniyeti" and think they are gonna be rich when they get into EU and tries to turn country into Ukraine.
What wrong with religious people? The very reason Allah SWT willed the dismantling of the Ottoman Empire is because it went further and further away from its Islamic principles.
@@Dem1Der you are deflecting your own fault to allah now ?
@@kizgintosbaga No. It is the fault of the Muslim’s straying away from Islam that caused the downfall of the empire.
Learn history not brainwash propaganda,,,they let Portuguese and French troops in that slaughtered people in villages
And that's how this man ensured the decline of Ottoman empire and have a lasting effect on the Muslim Ummah. Since this was the watershed moment that ultimately led to the unending problems of the Middle East
This comment section deals with unrealistic what ifs without seeing the history for what it is
Why did Hussein bin Ali reign as Caliph same as his greatest father, Imam Hassan son of Ali ?
cool right ?
Ayo what? 😮 ottoman were centuries after prophet's grandson time
@@MiaMaraa
you missed the point.
Hasan son of Ali reign for 6 months before he gave up for Umayyad.
the Sharifate of mecca are supposed descendent of Hassan.
Sharif Hussein, after the fall of Ottoman Caliphate, he declared new Caliphate in Mecca but he last a Caliph for 6 months because of Saudi attacks and war..
@@Era_Of_Awakening Or was forced to.
@@Era_Of_Awakeningwhy dont you guys understand
Hussein and this and that
Doesnt matter
Ummah did it was supossed
To hell with this hussein and hassan
We are here now becaue of all that stupid infighitng for two losrs who got their heads cut off
and no hassan and hussein are not any prohphet so they cant be considered religious figure
They are historical figure
So dont try make your own cult on based this two losers
I thought it’s haram to rebel again Muslim ruler.
It is. A hundred years later and we are still arguing on who started 😅.
Muslim ruler?who? The last Muslim ruler was Abdulhamid who was overthrown in 1908. After that,ottoman state was ruled by a westernised YounG Turk kids who thought they could reform the empire but failed. There's a reason why Armenians,Kurds Arabs all rebelled
As a Muslim Turk, I would like to say that the Ottoman Empire became very corrupt during this man's time, during the nationalism movement and the tanzimat period. Look at the man called Mahmud II, for example, he was the one who made wearing a fez a law (obligation) and introduced some secular systems into the state. In our opinion, he was the ‘Gavur Padishah’. Gavur means infidel. During the reign of Abdulhamid II, he was often subjected to fitna due to parasites within the state. When these parasites brought him down, they brought the old sultan, who did not understand the state affairs, to power and destroyed the state by putting the state into the 1st world war.
Remember this; the reason for this man's rebellion may have been unjust, but the British were not so simple, they broke their promises against the possibility that this man would increase his relations with Turkey, which was the continuation of the Ottoman Empire after the war, and placed the ancestor of the House of Saud. For example, Gertrude Bell was the one who destroyed the Ottoman Empire, she created more than 20 countries out of the caliphate, she was the teacher of Lawrence of Arabia. Whenever she entered Muslim lands, she would cover herself and speak as if she was one of them. Lawrence has a saying: ‘I was so carried away that sometimes I was praying evening prayers when no one was there.' Do you see the hypocrites?
For me, the most vivid story is the story of Abdulhamid. He is a paranoid man (as it is), he does not trust anyone around him (parasites), but one day he learns about a man in a town who has knowledge of hundreds of hadiths and has lived there for years. After testing him, he calls him to him one night and the man he brought in describes it like this; ‘’The sultan called me to him and I hurriedly went to him. when they took me to the palace, he was on the balcony, his back was turned to me, he turned to me and showed me a list ‘’the list of agents he had exposed‘’, he counted the names of each of them, I waited for my name, he hugged me and said words expressing his trust, he poured his tears on my shoulder. when he finished counting names in the list, I understood that the sultan couldn't have exposed me‘’ Arminius Vambery (British Spy)
And the sultan unfortunetly give him the most mahram(private) information of the state. Our saddest and weakest period indeed... If you look at the wars of the last century and mark them, you will see that you have drawn the borders of the last caliphate, that is, the Ottoman Empire.
You arent Turk..
YES he did. Just look at palestine, syria and iraq now. They were much better under the Ottomans
Thanks
Shame on the Arabs of that time as well as their descended.
Ajam go learn history
Because they have ancestor Lawrence
it was proficied that the jews would return to palestine
there was nothing we can do to stop it, theres no point in putting the blame on other ppl
We must say one thing about the YoungTurks…The head of them Enver Pasha was a pro islamist but the process pushed him to Turkic ideology…Turcification didnt emerge abruptly…it came as opposed to armenian and different balcan ethnic groups’ revolts that bring about many killings of civillian Turks in the villages by these groups…
The Right to kick off of colonization and whatever form might be.
Hüseyin Sang pemberontak Khalifah , It's tragic that he caused such a divide,
Short answer is No.
In fact his ancestors was abu lahab
There are multiple errors in your video. First of all, turkification was only applied in the region called Anatolia. The Ottomans did not interfere with the internal affairs of the Arabian Peninsula, they only appointed governors, collected taxes and requested soldiers during jihad. And the seeking for independence & uprisings in the Balkans were long before the coup of the Young Turks and were generally supported by Russia. For example, Greece declared its independence long before the Young Turks.
The Ottoman Empire lost a lot of blood in the Balkans and Europe in the last century. After the French revolution, every nation in the Balkans began to revolt. The Ottomans lost many martyrs to suppress the rebellions. Essentially, the Young Turks were aware that the empire was deteriorating and they could not stop the disintegration, so they had no choice but turkification to protect Anatolia, where a large part of the population was Turkish, against such uprisings. This includes the Armenian deportation. Because Armenian gangs raided many Turkish villages in Eastern Anatolia and massacred the Turks, many mass graves belonging to the Turks were found. At that moment there was no choice other than turkification. Then the Ottoman Empire entered the First World War and became even weaker. Many Turkish soldiers were martyred to suppress the British-backed Arab uprising. Don't forget Fahreddin Pasha, who endured the siege with his soldiers, hungry and thirsty, to protect the holy lands. After all, there has been no peace in the Balkans or the Middle East for years!
Nice, it’s good to know that in the same way that Zionists have lost their memories past October 7th, the Muslims have lost their memories past 1948. Let’s always remember that nationalism is the reason of all the trouble in the Middle East, not the West!
Arab revolt destroyed Khilafah and the strength of Ummah with it.
the slow poison of nationalism
Poor guy he was fooled by the Brits
he is not
@@ALZBNZ wdym💀
It is always important for powers that are to support credible and responsible oppositions over irresponsible and incompetent ones even if that has potential of creating new challenges.
Out of all Arab people the Hashemites have been in my eyes the most respectable lots of people.
When I make that statement what comes to the picture in my memory are thr few people I had seen of surname Hashmi and I am assuming they have some connection to Hashemites.
However, while discussing this I would also like to stress again on the fact that a competent, responsible group of people mixing with or leading an incompetent, irreponsible lot will always create a dicy situation, so it is not only important to decide on the best opposition but also on the best allies or best team.
Obviously the Al-sauds had betrayed Hussain and probably that saga is still continuing.
On the part of the British it also shows continuous positions in power can also erode at human capabilities of people and make them unwise.
Fast forward to 20th century and this was again proved when America failed to support a credible leadership change by backing Mikhail Gorbachev more vigorously during the transition period over Boris Yeltsin and that has already cost us the Ukraine war and lives of many people.
Lest people think I am putting the blame on americans and british actually I am not, i am just stressing the wisdom of giving importance to responsible people within ones team and allies as well as in the iopposition , those choices turn out to be important factors during crucial situations, this also brings to light the fact that human beings with power can also become vulnerable to mistakes costing lots as when without power, the temptations to travel the easiest path will always be there and probably will be the most dicy one.
Remember history shows lot of good examples of that.
One of which is my particular favorite.
Alexander the Great had given back the Kingdom of the defeated rival King Porus of Indus river region in respect for Porus's bravery and I think I read that Porus provided valuable service as an ally of Alexander subsequently.
All what happened in the past and that will happen in future is by the will of Allah.
Stop worrying about past and future. Worry about the hereafter!
over simplified.
DO NOT be fool it's not Arabs mistake alone, some of Turks also demanded to be separated from "Ummah"
The question is should the ottoman empire under the control of a freemason named mustafa kamal attaturk who gave jews the permission to settle in palestine be considered the ottoman empire? I think it was the zionist puppet republic of turkey disguised under the name of the ottoman empire... Ottoman empire died way back in 1909 after mustafa kamal attaturk organised a military coup against the last real ottoman sultan abdul hamid R.A. so the arabs didn't revolt against the ottomans they revolted against the zionist puppet attaturk who did everything in his power to erase islam from turkey...
ingilizlerle birlik olup osmanlıya karşı isyan edip savaşan araplarda suç yok öyle mi? o senin yerlere göklere sığdıramadığın abdülhamid osmanlı topraklarının yarısından fazlasını sarayında otururken verdi. Sarayından çıkmadı bile. O küfür ettiğin atatürk cepheden cepheye koştu. bunları neden söylemiyorsun? İşiniz günüz yalan dolan.
I would normally say any land would want independence, but to believe that the British and the French are looking out for your best interest is just stupid.
Independence from who
So that you can then become puppet of another land
@@verilyze independence from the Turks. That’s why I said normally it would have been fine, but the fact that he only fought the Turks believing that the British and the French are going to grant him independence was stupid.
He was decieved to betray the ottomans offered a poisoned sweet to blemish his credibility,well history has judged him already may Allah forgive and mercy on his soul after all he was just a human bound by weakness and flaws.
Ottoman lost its grace when they started following the Europeans. It was Khalifate in name. The literally adopted their constitution from the Napoleonic Code in 1858 not from Sharia.
One clear and known fact is that whenever a question or a personal thought is written as a headline in a newspaper or a youtube video (as of now and here). The answer is no and not. Dear gentlemen the Sherifs of Makkah are friends of Ottomans and not subjects, so there are no treason in this situation, and afterall the only one was open for realtions with the Ottomans is the wise Sherif Hussain, Hijaz state is considered a special state that is not controled by the Ottomans and never and if there was treasons of Ottomans go look who are the traitors from their subjects not the Sherifs. The Sherifate of Makkah is a higher rank than any rank more the Sultan and they knew it. Read history and understand the facts before posting here and there and before all respect yourself as the land will not respect your rotten body when you will be buried under it.
Nevermind brothers, the Ottomans gonna be back with your help!
Greedy people always become traitors.