Your videos are very helpful Sir... Cleared all my concepts. Thank you. A kind request..Some of your cpc videos are not added in your CPC playlist, kindly add them in the list so that other students would cover complete cpc. Videos not added are:- 1. Order 42 and 44 2. Order 39 3. Order 36 special case 4. Order 39 temporary inj. 5. Order 40 receiver lec 2 6. Order 41...All 4 lectures 7. Order 45 Appeal to SC 8. Sec 47 to 54 9. Sec 91 and 92 10. Sec 96 to 99A 11. Sec 100 to 103 12. Sec 104 to 106 13. Sec 113 14. Sec 114 15. Sec 115 16. Sec 132 to 139 17. Sec 144 18. Sec 145 onwards.
It seems, constructive resjudicata u/o 2(2) prevents multiplicity of suit on same cause.. In the first one if all the relief is not claimed and even not amended correcting the same in claim, the decision of first suit would later bar another suit on leftover claim with same cause of action..
Where the Plaintiff (one Person) sues Defendant(one Person) for the immovable Property and the suit was decided by Court on Merits and decree was passed in favour of Defendant, Whether the other Person or Third Person or New Person is precluded from Filing a fresh suit in relation to the same immovable Property.
Third person is not excluded from filing a fresh suit on the same property because 1. Its npt expressly barred by Cpc. 2. No res judicata has applied-because the parties are not same. The cause of action might not even be the same. Etc
Excellent lecture sir... thank you so much...🙏😇 One question, can we interpret that order 2 rule 2 is covered under section 9(courts to try suits of all civil nature) as an express bar ? Also section 11 Res judicata Ka ek dimension yha bhi reflect krta h ?
Sir if claims divide kar diye to bring suit to the pecuniary jurisdiction of court..can we get the remaining amount in a separate suit for same cause of action..please clarify
Hello sir you have cleared so many concepts, thank you so much sir... I have a question sir, What is the difference between sec 11(4) and order 2 rule 2 and if there was already sec 11(4) then why order 2 rule 2 was needed?
Res judicata relates to the plaintiff's duty to put forth all the grounds of attack in support of his claim, whereas Order 2 Rule 2 of the Code requires the plaintiff to claim all reliefs flowing from the same cause of action in a single suit. The two pleas are different and one will not include the other
Res Judicata and O. 2 r.2 difference 1. This refers to plaintiff's duty to bring forward all the grounds of attack in support of his claim. This requires the Plaintiff to claim all reliefs flowing from the same cause of action. 2. This refers to both the parties i.e. Plaintiff as well as Defendent and precludes a suit as well as defence. This refers to only to the Plaintiff and bars a suit.
Sir what is difference between dismissal of suit and rejection of plaint?dismiss kyon hota hai aur reject kyon hota hai sirji? Plz ans it sir........ 🙏🙏
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 sir ji pehli baat to yeki main believe nahi kar pa rahi hun apne reply dia..... Sir ap bahut ache padhate ho main apka Sare video dekh ta hu.......thanku so much sir🙏🙏
Sir criminal case main jo charge frame hota hai by argument ye to section frame hote hai actually...... Lekin sir yehi things civil main hota hai ya kuch alag hota hai sir plz thoda bata do plz sir..
Sir in order 2 rule 2 if the plaintiff with the leave of the court relinquishes or omits the claim then afterwards the plaintiff may frame a suit regarding the claim??
And further also if the plaintiff relinquishes any portion in suit in order to bring the suit within the jurisdiction, then afterwards for the remaining claim the plaintiff may file second suit or not??
Nise information...
🙏
Sir Thankyou so much. I wasn’t able to understand the explanation of Order 2 Rule 2. This really helped me a lot.
Thnx sir❤❤
Thnku thnku
Your videos are very helpful Sir... Cleared all my concepts. Thank you.
A kind request..Some of your cpc videos are not added in your CPC playlist, kindly add them in the list so that other students would cover complete cpc.
Videos not added are:-
1. Order 42 and 44
2. Order 39
3. Order 36 special case
4. Order 39 temporary inj.
5. Order 40 receiver lec 2
6. Order 41...All 4 lectures
7. Order 45 Appeal to SC
8. Sec 47 to 54
9. Sec 91 and 92
10. Sec 96 to 99A
11. Sec 100 to 103
12. Sec 104 to 106
13. Sec 113
14. Sec 114
15. Sec 115
16. Sec 132 to 139
17. Sec 144
18. Sec 145 onwards.
Thank you g
Very nice video lecture sir thank you so much sir
The very best 👍💯
Thank you so much sir 🙏. . Respect.
You explain really well . . .
Very good lacture sir,
Apki class maire liye bhot important hai, thanks sir
Superb inputs in very easy language. Sir, Please upload video for order 3
Sir, will do g
3 ads in 10 mins,I wonder how many more to go
U re the best teacher ❤️
It seems, constructive resjudicata u/o 2(2) prevents multiplicity of suit on same cause.. In the first one if all the relief is not claimed and even not amended correcting the same in claim, the decision of first suit would later bar another suit on leftover claim with same cause of action..
Well said
Sir ji tnx by heart really a true teacher and the best lecture of my life
Nice lecture
done Sir. Thank you Very Much.
Best teacher
Awesome 👍 sir
Thank you sir
👌👌👌
Where the Plaintiff (one Person) sues Defendant(one Person) for the immovable Property and the suit was decided by Court on Merits and decree was passed in favour of Defendant, Whether the other Person or Third Person or New Person is precluded from Filing a fresh suit in relation to the same immovable Property.
Third person is not excluded from filing a fresh suit on the same property because 1. Its npt expressly barred by Cpc. 2. No res judicata has applied-because the parties are not same. The cause of action might not even be the same. Etc
Sir how to know the pecuniary jurisdiction of civil courts in punjab?
Excellent lecture sir... thank you so much...🙏😇
One question, can we interpret that order 2 rule 2 is covered under section 9(courts to try suits of all civil nature) as an express bar ?
Also section 11 Res judicata Ka ek dimension yha bhi reflect krta h ?
Order 2 rule is a SEPERATE clause so it's totally independent
Thank s sr
Thank you sir..
Sir suit for possession me damage relief chhod dia toh 2nd suit bar h ?
Yeh order2 k rule 5smj nhi aaya again vedio bna do sir pls
👍Kya breach of contract ke case mein teeno relief ek saath claim sakte hain ?
Damages injunction specific performance ?
Thanks sir
Sir pls eloborate O-2 Rule 5..
Sir if claims divide kar diye to bring suit to the pecuniary jurisdiction of court..can we get the remaining amount in a separate suit for same cause of action..please clarify
No
Hello sir you have cleared so many concepts, thank you so much sir...
I have a question sir,
What is the difference between sec 11(4) and order 2 rule 2 and if there was already sec 11(4) then why order 2 rule 2 was needed?
Res judicata relates to the plaintiff's duty to put forth all the grounds of attack in support of his claim, whereas Order 2 Rule 2 of the Code requires the plaintiff to claim all reliefs flowing from the same cause of action in a single suit. The two pleas are different and one will not include the other
Res Judicata and O. 2 r.2 difference
1.
This refers to plaintiff's duty to bring forward all the grounds of attack in support of his claim.
This requires the Plaintiff to claim all reliefs flowing from the same cause of action.
2.
This refers to both the parties i.e. Plaintiff as well as Defendent and precludes a suit as well as defence.
This refers to only to the Plaintiff and bars a suit.
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 thank you so much sir...
@@pry2306 welcome g
Sir ye jo last line boli h aapne uske hisab se plaint or suit mei kya difference h
Sir what is difference between dismissal of suit and rejection of plaint?dismiss kyon hota hai aur reject kyon hota hai sirji? Plz ans it sir........ 🙏🙏
Hello sir
Can you explain the term conduct of suit as per order 1 rule 11
sir please upload on order 3.
Kindly elaborate order 2 rule 5
Will make SEPERATE vedio
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 Thank you sir🤩🥰
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 sir, please upload the order 2 rule 5 video. Thank you.
Sir how to get your written notes ?
9478294750 what'sup only
Sir Rule 5 nahi Hua Clear
Sir Rule 5 samaj nahi aya, firse smjhado🙏
Sir ye framing of issue our settlement of issue same hai ya alag alag?
Sir pls tell me the use of joinder and non joinder
Plz check order 1
Sir please upload crpc lecture series
Sir aapk pass Sabhi orders ki name ki list hai to pls share kr dijiye..😊
sir rule 5 smajh nhi aaya
Please explain rule 5 again
Why framing of charge is not given in cpc?
Charge is a criminal word
Framing of issue is used for civil cases
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 sir ji pehli baat to yeki main believe nahi kar pa rahi hun apne reply dia..... Sir ap bahut ache padhate ho main apka Sare video dekh ta hu.......thanku so much sir🙏🙏
Sir app bas video ka voice thoda clear kardijiye app ki video bahut acha banega....
Sir criminal case main jo charge frame hota hai by argument ye to section frame hote hai actually...... Lekin sir yehi things civil main hota hai ya kuch alag hota hai sir plz thoda bata do plz sir..
Sir in order 2 rule 2 if the plaintiff with the leave of the court relinquishes or omits the claim then afterwards the plaintiff may frame a suit regarding the claim??
Also is there any difference in the words "claim" and "relief" ??
And further also if the plaintiff relinquishes any portion in suit in order to bring the suit within the jurisdiction, then afterwards for the remaining claim the plaintiff may file second suit or not??
confused in rule 5.
Good lecture