What Was the American Nuclear War Plan? - Cold War DOCUMENTARY

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 вер 2022
  • Claim your SPECIAL OFFER for MagellanTV here: try.magellantv.com/thecoldwar. Start your free trial TODAY so you can watch Big Bang in Tunguska and the rest of MagellanTV’s history collection: www.magellantv.com/explore/hi...
    Our historical documentary series on the history of the Cold War continues with a video on the American Strategic Air Command - the institution in charge of the preparation for a possible nuclear war. In this video we will discuss how prepared the US was for it.
    Taiwan Under the Kuomintang Dictatorship: • Taiwan Under the Kuomi...
    What Happened to the German and Japanese POWs?: • What Happened to the G...
    Operation Paperclip: • Operation Paperclip - ...
    German Expulsions: • German Expulsions Afte...
    Soviet Education System: • Soviet Education Syste...
    How Khrushchev Fed the Soviet People: • How Khrushchev Fed the...
    Novocherkassk Massacre 1962: • Novocherkassk Massacre...
    Soviet Tourism: • Soviet Tourism: How di...
    Soviet Passport System: New Serfdom or Reform?: • Soviet Passport System...
    Kaliningrad: How Russia Got a Stronghold in Europe: • Kaliningrad: How Russi...
    How the Soviets Won the Early Space Race: • How the Soviets Won th...
    Soviet Television and Radio: • Soviet Television and ...
    Top-5 Myths About the Soviet Union: • Top-5 Myths About the ...
    Support us on Patreon: / thecoldwar
    UA-cam membership / @thecoldwartv
    ✔ Merch store ► teespring.com/stores/thecoldwar
    ✔ Patreon ► / thecoldwar
    ✔ Facebook ► / thecoldwartv
    ✔ Instagram ► / thecoldwartv
    #ColdWar #StrategicAirCommand #Nuclear

КОМЕНТАРІ • 174

  • @robertsansone1680
    @robertsansone1680 Рік тому +12

    "I refuse to differentiate between bad luck and incompetence". Curtis LeMay

  • @rnklv8281
    @rnklv8281 Рік тому +91

    Although it's been modified thru the years, amazing that the B-52 is still in active service today.

    • @TheColdWarTV
      @TheColdWarTV  Рік тому +37

      it's possible that it could be a 100-year old airframe design by the time it is actually retired from service.

    • @yourstruly4817
      @yourstruly4817 Рік тому +5

      They would fire long range missiles to stay out of range of enemy SAMs and fighters though, because they wouldn't stand a chance otherwise

    • @michaelfisher7170
      @michaelfisher7170 Рік тому +5

      It makes me wonder..will an airframe developed today still be in use 70-80-90 years into our future? Or is the B 52 such a perfect one off that its design is brilliant for decade after decade? Guess we'll see.

    • @throwback19841
      @throwback19841 Рік тому +11

      @@michaelfisher7170 i could see a composite heavy bomber descended from the Boeing 787 having a 100 year lifespan. Honestly the 787 is a wonder plane.
      I honestly don't get why the b52 has endured so long other than the strength of the airframes... The rudder is too small and they are hauling around tons of disused wiring from ancient systems no longer in use. I can only assume it's because the US air force can't bring itself to write a bomber specification that is merely "good enough" vs "alien level stealth tech wunderwaffen"

    • @BlackHawkBallistic
      @BlackHawkBallistic Рік тому +1

      @@throwback19841 cost, it's cheaper to maintain/upgrade an existing airframe than go through the whole process to introduce a new one

  • @jonmcgee6987
    @jonmcgee6987 Рік тому +11

    Back in the early 80's. My parents were stationed at Fairchild AFB. My mom was in supply for one of the B-52 squadrons there. While my step-dad was a Survival Instructor. I had a few occasions been able to get up close, in the cockpit and actually walk on the top of a B-52.
    The B-52 still remains one of my favorite aircraft.

    • @GM8101PHX
      @GM8101PHX 2 місяці тому

      I was there also as Security Police 1977 to 1982!!

  • @henryj.8528
    @henryj.8528 10 місяців тому +3

    The story is LeMay kept an unlit cigar in his mouth all the time b/c he had developed Bell's Palsy while testing O2 masks in a high altitude chamber as a young pilot. By always having a cigar in his mouth, his drooping mouth was not noticeable.

  • @tng2057
    @tng2057 Рік тому +44

    Thinking of B-52 and SAAC, one will not fail to think of Vietnam War. Hope there will be an episode about how the air forces on both sides performed in Vietnam.

    • @waynemccormick4773
      @waynemccormick4773 Рік тому +1

      Agreed. I'd go as far as to say the B-52 and its evolving missions and configurations deserves its own episode.

    • @cascadianrangers728
      @cascadianrangers728 Рік тому +1

      I always think b36 peacemaker when I think SAC

    • @tng2057
      @tng2057 Рік тому +4

      B36 (and B47) unfortunately is (are) the forgotten bomber(s). Got outperformed and overshadowed by B52 big time. B58 and B1 got superseded by the old B52 as well.

    • @cascadianrangers728
      @cascadianrangers728 Рік тому +4

      @@tng2057 b52 is an amazing aircraft and will probably still be flying long after I am laid into my grave, but I can't help but love b36 because it's just crazy...six turning, four burning!

    • @waynemccormick4773
      @waynemccormick4773 Рік тому +2

      no argument. The B52 is the AK 47 of bombers. It was crude enough to be versatile in any situation. It may well see a century of service. Some families are 3d and 4th generation B52 pilots.

  • @A-MAN-12
    @A-MAN-12 Рік тому +86

    Great work as always. Maybe a video about Romania under Ceausescu, we were kind of “independent” from the rest of the Eastern Bloc and a maverick regime that was not liked by the USSR.

    • @oldesertguy9616
      @oldesertguy9616 Рік тому +3

      I may be mistaken, but I think he did a video on exactly that.

    • @classunknown
      @classunknown Рік тому +2

      10 years on the platform and no subs, lemme change that quick

    • @cmdrgarbage1895
      @cmdrgarbage1895 Рік тому +2

      Liked by neither the East, West and Romania itself.

  • @oldesertguy9616
    @oldesertguy9616 Рік тому +11

    Trying to retain experienced crews reminds me of today's business environment where it is common to not only change jobs, but careers, several times. Also, now I know why the Air Force gets such great food!

  • @gregcampwriter
    @gregcampwriter Рік тому +8

    If you need someone to kick people into cheerful organization, hire Curtis LeMay.
    But don't ever allow him to make decisions beyond that.

  • @macariomatira3234
    @macariomatira3234 Рік тому +29

    We Wish to have a feature episode about Paraguay under General Alfredo Stroessner and Uruguay under a civic-military dictatorship as well as the Philippines under Ferdinand E. Marcos

    • @oldesertguy9616
      @oldesertguy9616 Рік тому +3

      I think some videos on the various governments in South and Central America would be really interesting.

  • @timmccarthy982
    @timmccarthy982 Рік тому +5

    Speaking to a US Air Force pilot flying reconnaissance over Russia “Maybe, if we do this overflight right, we can get World War 3 started.”
    Commander US Airforce General Curtis LeMay 1954.

  • @disorganizedorg
    @disorganizedorg Рік тому +13

    "Peace is our Profession...
    ...War is just a Hobby"

  • @ShamelessMcBundy
    @ShamelessMcBundy Рік тому +13

    I actually really like the model of our nukes being controlled by civilians, rather than the military.

    • @Ganiscol
      @Ganiscol Рік тому

      The deployment of nukes is, like the military itself, controlled by the civilian government. And has always been.

    • @Nuuk_Nuke_Nook
      @Nuuk_Nuke_Nook Рік тому

      inb4 r/noncredibledefense gets to control the American nuclear arsenal

    • @jerrywatt1614
      @jerrywatt1614 Рік тому +1

      Bad news they are not its all sac all day baby ! Spooky !

    • @amkrause2004
      @amkrause2004 7 місяців тому

      Technically they are under civilian control.

  • @swancman
    @swancman Рік тому +3

    Great epsiode. Please do an episode on Strategic Air Command's Bomb/Recon/Nav/Missile Competitons! Not only was it a fun, and competitive, means for the SAC to demonstrate their skills it was also a public demonstration of the proficiency of SAC.
    If you're interested and need more info, I bet the Strategic Air Command and Aerospace Museum in Ashland, Ne, has some resources on the topic.

  • @saturnv2419
    @saturnv2419 Рік тому +4

    It is amazing that B-52 is basically older than almost everyone in the USAF now.

    • @oldesertguy9616
      @oldesertguy9616 Рік тому +2

      I think you can change that statement, leaving out the "almost." The first ones were made 70 years ago. I don't think we have any servicemen that old.

    • @amkrause2004
      @amkrause2004 7 місяців тому +2

      It's one of few aircraft where if it happened, the grandfather, the father and the son flew the exact same bomber.

  • @thethebangamer994
    @thethebangamer994 Рік тому +11

    Keep up the good work! Not enough historians focus on the cold war

  • @shawnmott3826
    @shawnmott3826 Рік тому +1

    Perfect timing on this video

  • @bifurious5580
    @bifurious5580 Рік тому +9

    I grew up neear the Plattsburgh air force base which housed some of the Atlas ICBM launch sites and I'd love to hear more about this system in the future!!!

    • @todd3285
      @todd3285 Рік тому

      Well maybe the control bunker was but the missile silos we're spread around the Adirondack Mountains and a few were in the Green
      Mountains in Vermont .

  • @letsgowinnietheflu5439
    @letsgowinnietheflu5439 Рік тому +1

    My dad signed up on 12-8-41 when the airforce was split with the army he went with the AF and was part of SAC always told the story about how he and some buddies painted on the tops of some of the hangers watch your a55 and kiss ours. the Soviets actually protested. The base commander laughed about it but they had to paint over it.

  • @xmanhoe
    @xmanhoe Рік тому

    Yet another fantastic video 😎 Hi from Belfast Northern Ireland 😎

  • @flakbait5771
    @flakbait5771 Рік тому +4

    Interesting breakdown; thank you! Also I got a chuckle out of the bit with first strike on the bell button; well done.

    • @Darthellawayc
      @Darthellawayc Рік тому

      Wow what a jerk! Nothing questionable about that…

  • @Game_Hero
    @Game_Hero Рік тому +7

    "and generally questionable human being Charles Lindbergh" XD

  • @blackstone777
    @blackstone777 Рік тому +1

    I grew up in omaha ne, so SAC hq was not that far from me in Belleview. During the 70s and 80s Offutt afb had an open house and air show every summer.

  • @lexington476
    @lexington476 Рік тому +4

    Cool video. I would have thought this video would have been much earlier in the channel's existence. I never noticed it was never there.

  • @markmcdonald6039
    @markmcdonald6039 Рік тому +3

    Have you done a video on Albania and there Dictator and his over preparation and fears of Yugoslav invasion that never happened? Also maybe do a an episode on Yugoslavia and the animosity between them and USSR/Eastern Block, and maybe even Tito for his own episode because he was quite the character!

  • @ThompsonAtomicRanch
    @ThompsonAtomicRanch 4 місяці тому +1

    If you’re ever in Arizona, stop by our Titan ii missile base. I’d love to show another Cold War historian/enthusiast around :)

  • @gort8203
    @gort8203 Рік тому +1

    Where do you get off in presenting an accurate and informative video? Watching other channels on military avaition led me to think this is not allowed by UA-cam.

  • @xrisc131
    @xrisc131 Рік тому +1

    I remember when the Buffs stood down. I went out to the flight line and all but two of the Buffs were gone from the alert pad. I remember thinking that if I ever saw this, I would have about 20 minutes left to live.

  • @Numba003
    @Numba003 Рік тому +4

    This kinda makes me think of a book called Phule's Company, where a rich captain reforms a cruddy military unit with positive reinforcement. It's a funny book lol. Thank you for another interesting history lesson!
    God be with you out there, everybody. ✝️ :)

  • @michaellehman1549
    @michaellehman1549 Рік тому +7

    Thoughtful work and deserving of hitting the subscribe button. Sounds like you have an interesting list of topics to pursue that I look forward to viewing in future episodes.
    LeMay was certainly a character of immense influence in setting US strategic policy and quite willing to pursue nuclear war if called upon. Another key character early on was J. Robert Oppenheimer, the physicist who directed the scientific efforts of the Manhattan Project, who continued on as the scientific director of the AEC. You observantly pinpointed the conflict over whether civilian or military control of nuclear weapons would prevail as a central thread of this story.
    The nature of that conflict is something you will undoubtedly touch on, with reasons typically given for it ranging from the Air Force's mistrust of Oppie due to his association with known Communists to claims that he actively worked to slow the development of new weapons. As you say, the truth gets gray and very murky.
    Here you should look into the Project GABRIEL report, issued in 1949 to answer the question of how much nuclear yield can be expended on the USSR before it endangers Americans? This was obviously responsive to the Air Force's first strike war plans, which came under review after Joe-1, the first Soviet test, was detected in late summer 1949. The answer turned out to be about 60 megatons of fission yield.
    The Air Force had a 200+ target list as far back as September 1945, most within the USSR with the remainder at its periphery. If addressed with Fat Man-sized weapons, all could be attacked in a first strike and keep the total yield well under 60 Mt. With the Soviet perfection of fission weapons, the Air Force in turn demanded thermonuclear weapons to replace the now-lost American nuclear monopoly by early acquisition of thermonuclear superiority.
    Doing the math of substituting A-bombs with H-bombs on the target list showed that the use of such an arsenal by SAC, even if the Soviets collapsed and failed to attack in response, would lead to disastrous consequences for Americans. Why? Do the math. The first two US thermonuclear test shots were 10 and 15 megatons respectively. Sticking by the GABRIEL preliminary findings, which Oppie apparently did in light of his work right up until his clearance was suspended, suggested that the Air Force could go to war with maybe half a dozen such weapons. That's where first strike fizzled conceptually, although LeMay would resist acknowledging it by suppressing the reason with secrecy, was among those in Air Force leadership who worked to strip Oppie of his Q clearance one day before it would have expired in any case, and continued with his plans for the vast expansion of SAC.
    What put the brakes on this conceptually flawed strategy, converting it and counterforce as well into what turned out to be an almost equally shaky deterrence? Testing in the atmosphere in 1958 rose to levels that crossed the 60 Mt threshold suggested by GABRIEL. Spring 1959 brought wheat from the upper Midwest that exceeded just-issued guidelines for radioactivity in foods even as testing halted due to international denunciation of its global imposition. A brief, but intense resumption of testing in 1961 and 1962 led to iodine-131 appearing in milk, as the total yield from testing those years exceeded the 60 Mt boundary several times over. Despite everything else going on between them, the US, UK, and USSR all agreed in 1963 to cease all atmospheric testing. It turned out that Oppenheimer and his colleagues had been correct, but LeMay managed to build a vast force whose capabilities included planetary environmental suicide by being among those who helped suppress the fact that this arsenal; was largely unusable in any rational sense.
    There's considerably more to the Cold War story as your agenda of future topics indicates. You can find more on these matters, along with the important role of nuclear intelligence in shaping strategy, in my dissertation, a free download at hdl.handle.net/2142/90554

  • @jarrowmarrow
    @jarrowmarrow Рік тому +2

    I think the general who starts the war in dr Strangelove is based on lamae

  • @jonniez62
    @jonniez62 Рік тому +7

    What was SAC? It was a state of mind, a way of life, follow the Tech Orders to the letter and no short cuts. If it wasn't in the book, you couldn't do it; the rest of the Air Force if it wasn't in the book it was fair game. To for give is divine, but not SAC policy. It was the fourth branch of the military, before the USAF.
    I grew up in SAC as a dependent and later served in SAC.

    • @dongately2817
      @dongately2817 Рік тому +1

      I’ve always been fascinated by the people and organizations that are responsible for our nuclear deterrence but wasn’t cut out for it myself. The willingness to use nuclear weapons is exactly what prevented them from ever being used again. I don’t think many people realize the implications of that.

    • @jonniez62
      @jonniez62 Рік тому +1

      @@dongately2817 we knew very well and why standards we're so high.
      Remember we talked about it on the play ground in the first grade...

  • @amkrause2004
    @amkrause2004 7 місяців тому +1

    The Air Force definitely needs to bring back SAC!

  • @thedysfunctionalbiographer3314

    Imagine loving Cold War era US Air Force history so much that you name your kids Sac, Tac and Mac.

    • @tokyosmash
      @tokyosmash Рік тому +1

      Then the grandson is named Jipoe.

    • @unr74
      @unr74 Рік тому +1

      No ADC?

  • @maxsmodels
    @maxsmodels Рік тому

    Good basic overview

  • @ligayamatira2293
    @ligayamatira2293 Рік тому +9

    Can you do a feature episode about the Philippines under Ferdinand E. Marcos,Indonesia under Suharto as well as Chile under Augusto Pinochet

  • @WildBillCox13
    @WildBillCox13 Рік тому +1

    Back in those days Bozo the clown wore a radiation suit, Clara's milk was daily tested for Strontium90, and Howdy Doody had to be decontaminated periodically (he didn't fit the suit). You think I joke? How many clowns looking for radiation suits in Doom today? Millions?
    So-yeah. I was there. So was Sparty, but no one else. All the rest are radioactive mutants now.
    The worst was the time Captain Kangaroo was closed down, while the AEC examined Tom Terrific's funnel hat for a Soviet planted bug. They found one, too. That's why no second season of Tom Terrific. Sad, that. Mighty Manfred had a bid in for the Batman Movie, but lost it during the lockdown. Tom sought asylum from Xrushchev, but was denied. "You cartoon characters are too gay for Russia!" he was quoted as saying. "In Soviet Russia, no one is allowed to be happy OR gay. Is capital crime to be both*."
    Proof positive that in Soviet Russia, you do not lampoon the government. The Government lampoons YOU!
    *Bri Griner found that out this year (2022)!

  • @GrinderCB
    @GrinderCB Рік тому +5

    Great episode. I didn't know that it would takes many days or weeks to use atomic bombs once the decision had been made, back in the late 1940's. Kind of changes the whole perspective on how the Cold War unfolded. Remember that even through the 50's and into the 60's the military and political leaders believed that nuclear war was winnable. We really didn't start regularly hearing about worldwide holocaust and nuclear winter until the late 60's or early 70's.

  • @RMMilitaryHistory
    @RMMilitaryHistory Рік тому +6

    Jimmy Stewart would be proud of this one 👌😎

    • @TheColdWarTV
      @TheColdWarTV  Рік тому +5

      All that movie needed was a few Bedfords, right?

    • @azimisyauqieabdulwahab9401
      @azimisyauqieabdulwahab9401 Рік тому +1

      Wait? This movie in the same name from 1955? Jimmy Stewart team up again with June Allyson (Dick Powell wife) & director once again Anthony Mann (Raw Deal, T-Men, El Cid & Side Street)

    • @michaelfodor6280
      @michaelfodor6280 Рік тому +5

      Here's some trivia for you. Jimmy Stewart served as a B-24 pilot during the war with the USAAF ending the war as a full Colonel, then continued on with the USAF reserve, qualifying on the B47 and B52. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Stewart#1941%E2%80%931947:_Military_service

    • @RMMilitaryHistory
      @RMMilitaryHistory Рік тому

      @@timf2279 only a refernce to the film he made about strategic air command. I know Stewart himself wasn’t a huge fan of violence

  • @Ed_in_Md
    @Ed_in_Md Рік тому

    Another great video! Thanks.

  • @MalunoMcSketch
    @MalunoMcSketch Рік тому +2

    These videos are tip top content

  • @turcarumimperator1395
    @turcarumimperator1395 Рік тому +1

    Turkey had an important role during the cold war. most of the nuclear missiles in european flank of nato was lcoated in Turkey, including tactical nuclear bombs. After the cold war most of them were removed by the turkish state and NATO troops in Turkey but there are still 80 Tactical Nuclear Bombs in Incirlik Air base, one of the biggest nato air bases. Turkey was the only coutnry that had borders with Soviet Union, others had borders with soviet sattelite states unlike Turkey. also we were really close to soviet industrial areas. and if i remember correctly, according to NATO plans if the nuclear war breaks up between Soviet Union and NATO, Turkish army would start an offensive towards caucasia and azerbaijan while other nato members in europe waiting for the us army to coutnrt attack against soviets. so it would be the only nato country that prepares an offensive against red army while others were defending. and thanks to cold war, turkish army was HUGE. it is still 2nd biggest army in nato.
    nowadays relations between turkey and us is not good, many turks have negative opinion about us thanks to us invasion of Iraq. but i hope relations will be fixed in the future.

  • @luisvelez5695
    @luisvelez5695 Рік тому +1

    We had 24/7 food on SAC bases, great food

  • @eggy741
    @eggy741 Рік тому +1

    Can you do an episode on the UK during Cold War?

  • @fku1217
    @fku1217 Рік тому +1

    I suppose lemay is the reason why the usaf has better food and housing compared to other branches?

  • @iKvetch558
    @iKvetch558 Рік тому +8

    9:52 LeMay "was responsible for introducing the strategy of firebombing Japanese cities."
    No he was not...he was ordered to use firebombing on Japanese cities...and he was sent to the Marianas to relieve the guy before him who had refused to do so. The decision to firebomb Japan was made at the highest levels of the American government and military, and happened way way above LeMay's pay grade. What LeMay did was figure out how to make firebombing work, and then he had the ruthlessness to carry out the attacks. 💯✌

    • @jguillot72
      @jguillot72 Рік тому +1

      He was responsible for making the bombing more accurate by lowering the altitude that the bombers flew and weeding out those who wouldn't carry out their orders. The firebombing of German and Japanese cities were war crimes on a massive scale but the victors do not face consequences.

    • @iKvetch558
      @iKvetch558 Рік тому +1

      @@timf2279 Good point...the Japanese did go much further in militarizing their "civilian" population than anybody else, at least by the time the Allies were getting ready to invade in mid-1945. They had started inducting all unmarried males 15 to 60 and unmarried females 17 to 40, and really did plan to use millions of these Volunteer Fighting Corps folks to turn the Allied invasion into a bloodbath. It got to the point where the US had effectively determined that there were no targets in Japan that should be off limits because the distinction between civilian and military no longer existed in the Home Islands.

  • @starvingpeoplecantcomplain
    @starvingpeoplecantcomplain Рік тому +1

    Everything larger than a tactical nuke is MAD!

  • @amkrause2004
    @amkrause2004 7 місяців тому +1

    To err is human, to forgive is not SAC policy.

  • @Johnnycdrums
    @Johnnycdrums Рік тому +1

    Major Kong was the best.

  • @davidmccann9811
    @davidmccann9811 Рік тому +1

    What was the ability of the USSR to deliver a nuclear strike in 1950? Was their copy of the B 29 any good?

  • @mohammedsaysrashid3587
    @mohammedsaysrashid3587 Рік тому +1

    Most Informative & interesting Video allot thanks(The Cold War )channel ..It seems to me From Earliest Moment of Cold war (USA Selected Offensive Option air Strikes By Nuclear Bombes Bombarding & Much Progressive Bombers .While USSR imposed (obligated )to embodying Defensive Option Through interceptors Because USSR suffered from lack of Financial capability & Less Progressive technology -Scientific efforts & Strength

  • @PaulJWells-ud2eq
    @PaulJWells-ud2eq Рік тому +4

    Thank you, thank you, thank you.
    I grew up a 70s USAAF-TAC brat. Dad always said two things: "Vote Republican, they take care of the military." And of course, "The AF doesn't care about TAC. Bombers and their families get all the REAL money."
    Holloman AFB, NM was my home for seven years. Loved the great memories but, hindsight however is quite different. Our home was a drafty cinderblock duplex which also served as a busy brown roache metro stop. Minimal support resources: hospital staff, playground equipment, library, groceries and so much less.
    Your explanation of the why...USA's Top WW2 War Crime Allstar...Gen Curtis LeMay!
    Good to know who REALLY made my childhood difficult.
    Thank you, thank you, thank you.

    • @billrhodes5603
      @billrhodes5603 Рік тому

      I grew up during the same time period on a SAC base in northern Michigan called Kincheloe AFB. The difference between your experience and mind lends credence to what you say. Even though the base was in BFE we had had every amenity you can think of...bowling alley, movie theater, gymn, etc. We also had lakes we could ride our bikes to to fish and swim in the summer. During the winter, the hill that led down to the lake would be used for skiing (it had a lift and lodge) and ice skating.
      The men who fought create the USAF out of the srmy control all viewed air power as a strategic tool to destroy the enemies ability to wage war by destroying their infrastructure. Tactical support of ground forces was an after thought. Thus, TAC was the unwanted stepchild. The USAF primarily crested TAC so they could keep the army out of the fixed wing business and TACs primary mission up until around 1980 was still nuclear strike. That's why it's aircraft were so I'll suited for action in Vietnam.

  • @johnwatson3948
    @johnwatson3948 Рік тому +3

    This is really good - however the B-36 could be considered underpowered at full payload but the atomic bombs were far lighter than this at only 10,000 lbs - B-36 had plenty of power and range at that weight.

  • @lessonslearned2569
    @lessonslearned2569 Рік тому +1

    I wouldn't call LeMay a "genius". More like a madman.

  • @_Abjuranax_
    @_Abjuranax_ Рік тому +3

    LeMay also thought that the Kennedy's were weak for not adopting his first strike doctrine. He also proposed that we drop the bomb on an U.S. city, and then blame it on the Cubans and Soviets as a pretense to war. JFK just looked at the Joint Chiefs like they had just lost their minds. But you needed Hawks like LeMay to build a fighting force like SAC to operational levels, but they also comprised our biggest threat for actually going to nuclear war.

    • @jguillot72
      @jguillot72 Рік тому

      He never proposed that. He did however propose Operation NorthWoods along with the Joint Chiefs to JFK. JFK famously laughed it off.

  • @bigsarge2085
    @bigsarge2085 Рік тому +1

    Interesting.

  • @cascadianrangers728
    @cascadianrangers728 Рік тому +1

    Anyone remember Curtis Lemay's nickname was?

  • @phillbeutel9459
    @phillbeutel9459 Рік тому

    Is this the same narrator of the explorers podcast ?

  • @henrimichelpierreplana4332
    @henrimichelpierreplana4332 Рік тому +4

    So in Dr Strangelove, Gen J. Ripper is C. Lemay?

    • @iKvetch558
      @iKvetch558 Рік тому +4

      Just the cigar part...General Turgidson is the rest of LeMay

    • @TheColdWarTV
      @TheColdWarTV  Рік тому +5

      there is a strong contention that Gen. Tommy Power, who took over SAC after LeMay was promoted, is the real-life model in Dr. Strangelove and not Curt LeMay. Cigar notwithstanding.

    • @henrimichelpierreplana4332
      @henrimichelpierreplana4332 Рік тому +1

      @@iKvetch558 right right. I always hesitate...

    • @iKvetch558
      @iKvetch558 Рік тому +3

      @@TheColdWarTV Indeed...Tommy Power was LeMay's protégé, to a large extent...and his views were as if LeMay had been turned up to 11, as they say. 💯✌

    • @jguillot72
      @jguillot72 Рік тому

      @@TheColdWarTV Yes...Power was the quintessential Cold Warrior.

  • @KrisWustrow
    @KrisWustrow Рік тому +1

    Great video! Can anyone recommend a good book about General LeMay's organizational changes ("change management" for an MBA term) at SAC? I'd love to know more. Thanks

    • @richardthomas598
      @richardthomas598 Рік тому

      He didn't change anything. He created SAC. It was built in his image, which is why it was so inflexible, unimaginative and sociopathic.

  • @ABCDELIJAH
    @ABCDELIJAH Рік тому +1

    Big Fallout vibes

  • @madcat789
    @madcat789 Рік тому +1

    I worry for the future. But something this nice keeps me at ease.

  • @greenkoopa
    @greenkoopa Рік тому +2

    I like trees as much as the next guy but in your ad read you said the Tunguska Blast was a "catastrophe" but nobody died except for the Bolshevik trees

  • @c1ph3rpunk
    @c1ph3rpunk Рік тому

    Was? What it is now.

  • @railgap
    @railgap 11 місяців тому

    "was"

  • @batTorah
    @batTorah Рік тому

    Will future videos include ADC and NORAD??

  • @SimonWallwork
    @SimonWallwork 3 місяці тому

    In the SIOP, China was getting it, even if they did nothing. Different times...

  • @timothywalker4563
    @timothywalker4563 Рік тому

    There is only so much you can cover in less than an hour 😂

  • @tommy-er6hh
    @tommy-er6hh Рік тому +3

    nice video about capabilities - but the TITLE said war plan - which you never really covered. Minus a point for click baiting.

  • @Azrael8
    @Azrael8 Рік тому

    Can't wait to hear more about this moving into the 1950s and 1960s

  • @josedavidgarcesceballos7
    @josedavidgarcesceballos7 Рік тому

    Humble suggestion: would you mind explaininh why the US went from nuclear parity to nuclear supremacy? Cheers.

    • @dave8599
      @dave8599 Рік тому +2

      Why? Because Americans wanted to remain free, and thus wanted to be assured that communism cannot beat us.

  • @brokenbridge6316
    @brokenbridge6316 Рік тому

    Nice video. Maybe we can see a video on what the Russian Nuclear War plan was like.

  • @magna750
    @magna750 Рік тому +3

    Curt Lemay is one of my heroes. It's also of note that before WW2 he was thought of as the best navigator in the USAAC. He also revolutionized the way the air war in Europe was conducted concerning the use of bombers and their support. An American hero in all respects.

    • @lolshark99b49
      @lolshark99b49 Рік тому

      he was a huge bastard

    • @howilearned2stopworrying508
      @howilearned2stopworrying508 Рік тому +3

      I also idolize serial killers

    • @magna750
      @magna750 Рік тому

      @@howilearned2stopworrying508 Show me on the doll how the USA hurt you.

    • @richardthomas598
      @richardthomas598 Рік тому +1

      Imagine describing LeMay as a personal hero 🤦

    • @Sitzenleben
      @Sitzenleben 8 місяців тому

      Didnt LeMay advise JFK to launch a nuclear attack on the Soviet Union?

  • @jacobkudrowich
    @jacobkudrowich Рік тому +1

    1:05 , "the largest explosion ever recorded" i dont think it's even necessary to say that this is blatantly incorrect. You either misspoke and meant to further clarify the biggest recorded natural explosion caused by an air bursting meteorite but I can only assume you just dont put much effort in researching and fact checking your script . Either way 0/5 bad first impressions for your channel

  • @stalzemsty1669
    @stalzemsty1669 Рік тому +1

    Bombs Away Lemay!

  • @PETE4955
    @PETE4955 Рік тому

    As if you would know.

  • @cernejr
    @cernejr Рік тому +3

    Where are people like Curtis LeMay today? Why did he have only 1 child and not 10? It would be interesting to measure and compare the IQs of today's US military leaders vs. the WW2 era leaders.

    • @iKvetch558
      @iKvetch558 Рік тому +1

      Unfortunately, LeMay had a hard time adapting to the changing nature of the Cold War. His thinking was good for the early phase, when there were only bombers for the nuclear deterrent mission, and only fission weapons available to arm them with. When it was still possible to "win" a nuclear war, and there would be no global holocaust to inevitably follow from nuclear winter and other effects, LeMay's understanding of how to turn SAC into an organization that would be an effective deterrent was spot on. However, once thermonuclear bombs became the norm, and ever increasing numbers of ICBMs and SLBMs were on hair trigger alert, LeMay's way of doing things led to operational plans that were verging on the ridiculous, and the American response to any nuclear attack was almost guaranteed to end much of human life as we know it on the planet. Just look at the SIOP that would have been followed if Arkhipov had not been there and the Soviets had launched their nuke torpedo...it included the expenditure of something like 3500 nukes on more than 2000 targets, or something approximately as equally insane. ✌

    • @rnklv8281
      @rnklv8281 Рік тому +1

      @@iKvetch558 You make a good point when you say "early phase" , a time when even the best of minds believed a war between the United States and the Soviet Union was Inevitable. Fortunately cooler heads would prevail and a policy of detente became "acceptable" by both sides.

    • @jguillot72
      @jguillot72 Рік тому +1

      @@iKvetch558 Thank God Vasiliy said Nyet!

  • @ThatGuyWhoLivesinChina
    @ThatGuyWhoLivesinChina Рік тому +1

    Rings of Steel - The Nike Story

  • @beepboop204
    @beepboop204 Рік тому

    🙃

  • @scottkrater2131
    @scottkrater2131 Рік тому +2

    No idea the Air Force was basically tell our strategic bomber crews, your going to Moscow, but won't be able to return to base. Your on your own getting home. Think about Turkey.

    • @rnklv8281
      @rnklv8281 Рік тому +2

      Sounds like a scene from the movie "Fail Safe"

    • @scottkrater2131
      @scottkrater2131 Рік тому +2

      @@rnklv8281 Maybe more like Dr. Strangelove lol.

    • @pamelaharris8480
      @pamelaharris8480 3 місяці тому

      My Dad was a B-58 pilot and always told me that if he was really sent to his target, and got there, he very likely wouldn’t make it home. I asked why not, he refueled in the air! He said the tankers would have been easy targets. He seemed pretty stoics about it, so I asked if he didn’t want to get home to us, and he said No, that we wouldn’t survive even a near hit to the base, and that he didn’t want us to survive a nuclear war. He said that he didn’t want to survive a nuclear war. This sounds like a pretty harrowing talk between a father and his teenage daughter, but I was pretty smart and was already ferreting out answers on my own. I appreciate that he was always honest with me. He said the only good option was to not get into a war in the first place. That helped a lot with understanding, and being patient with, him being on alert so much, the ORIs, and generally being anxious every time I got home from school and his flight suit and flight boots were gone. Yeah, I checked every day. A good man, a hero in my eyes and I will always be proud of him.

  • @-JA-
    @-JA- Рік тому

    🙂👍

  • @mat3714
    @mat3714 Рік тому +1

    Algorithm

  • @amyreynolds3619
    @amyreynolds3619 Рік тому

    Rickover and the first nuke submarine.

  • @frankmiano5266
    @frankmiano5266 Рік тому +2

    #WeLoveDavid

  • @mohilibya9692
    @mohilibya9692 Рік тому

    3rd

  • @sheldoniusRex
    @sheldoniusRex Рік тому +3

    Curt LeMay unironically did nothing wrong.
    Neither did Mr. Lindbergh.

  • @amyreynolds3619
    @amyreynolds3619 Рік тому +1

    How about the boomers and the nuclear submarines.

  • @frederikvanstolk5815
    @frederikvanstolk5815 Рік тому +3

    1st