Die B-52 ist ein gigantisches Wunderwerk. Sie hat ihren Erstflug bereits am 15. April 1952 mit Erfolg absolviert und ist heute immer noch militärisch gefragter denn je. Dieses Flugzeug hat enorm große Start- und Landeklappen und die werden nur an "Haken" gehalten. Wie ist das möglich?! Heute werden dafür mehrere, unter den Tragflächen angebrachte, aerodynamische Führungen gebraucht!
My father flew on those aircraft as a tail gunner in the actual tail. He retired when they transitioned to E, F, G & H models as the gunner sat up with the rest of the crew. He had no desire to be in a position to be the designated go for for the crew and liked the isolated position of the tail gunner in the tail. Don't worry he flew in many aircraft including the B-26 and many in-between.
At unstick (when it leaves the ground), the BUFF weighs 488,000 pounds with a full fuel load or fuel plus bomb load. That means for start, taxi, and takeoff roll, it weighs around 512,000 pounds to start with and burns 24,000 pounds of fuel to arrive at the 488,000 pounds at unstick. Those are the numbers for the B52G I flew during VietNam and the cold war. The B52H is the only model flying now and may have different numbers. There are bigger and heavier transport planes that have only (only?) four engines. The C5 Galaxy comes to mind.
Seen a B52 fly, what an amazing aircraft! I have seen one on static display at RIAT & in the American Air Museum at Imperial War Museum Duxford. An amazing aircraft to see
Yeah, the reason it has 8 "turbo jets / with a low bypass ratio" is that they are not very powerful . Look at todays C5 Galaxy it only has four hi bypass " turbo fans." And its huge. Remember, these engines were designed about 50yr ago .
No. It's because they didn't have big enough jet engines in the 1950s when the plane was designed. They have big enough jet engines today so it could be refitted with 4 jet engines.
In spite of its 8 jet engines, the B-52 also needed JATO bottles to assist with take off when heavily loaded. The aircraft first flew at Boeing's Everett Field in 1954 and is still in service, today -- almost 70 years later. Man, that makes me feel old!
That was the B-47 that used the JATO bottles to help get off the ground. The non-fan B-52's did have to rely on water injection to boost engine thrust. The H models have more powerful TF33 fanjets.
@@earlsmall9808 Yes, I think you're right, Earl. Did they build a special field in Seattle just for the B-52? Or was it for the 747? I know both required a longer runway.
I saw the first flight of the B-52 in the summer of 1954. It came from Boeing Field in Everett, Wash. It had a B-47 as a chase plane and also a delta-winged fighter plane. It never retracted its landing gear on that flight and it flew very slowly in a loop around Tacoma. I keep hearing that its first flight was in 1952, but I don't think that's correct. In that same summer, Boeing's Dash 80, the prototype of the 707, first flew. Its pilot, Tex Johnston, put it through his famous barrel-roll maneuvers over the Sea Fair crowd at Lake Washington.
I was up on a hill with a camcorder, when a C-17 circled around me at very low altitude, heading for a landing approach at our Mahlon Sweet Field. It seemed to be going so slow, I couldn't help but wonder what was holding it in the air. I got some good video footage of it and was glad that it made a safe, uneventful landing.
فى الجو ينخفض الظغط الجوى او يرتفع لهذا ينصح بتناول الحلوه فتوزع المظيفات الحلوه على المسافرين حيث يسمعغ المسافر طنين فى اذنيه وعندما تقلع الطائه يقول القبطان "نرجو ربط الاحزمه" وكذالك فى الهبوط والطائرات تسير بالمحركات النفاثه حيث تنفث الريح من مؤخرتها وهذا يدفعها للامام على ما اعتقد ..هذا كل ما اعرفه عن الطائرات حيث انى عندى خبره فى السفر على الطائرات الظخمه مثل البوينغ
hey guys! Could you turn on the subtitles? My father speaks Spanish, I made the settings, but they don't work unless you activate them, so they can reach more views and I mean everyone, the languages, thank you!
While a fully loaded A380 (575 tons) can take off with 4 engines, this B52H weighing under 90 tons should be able to take off with only 2 engines. These 8 engines must be related to something else. Headline of the video says it's about the bigness but it doesn't make sense.
هي متصله في بعضها الأجنحه علشان تحتمل الوزن الثقيل من القنابل ثقيلة الوزن فيه قنابل كلها شضايا حديد صلب ثقيل الوزن وفيه تزن اطنان مقارنه في حجمها وطايرة ال شحن العملاقه جلكسي أجنحتها متصلها في بعضها ولكنها فيه ٤محركات مرعبه وبسرعه تشق الفضا.. بعكس طايرات الركاب أجنحتها ليست متصله في بعضها وهذا يتطلب تكلفه من الالميوم الصلب المضاف اليه مواد معالجه صعب الأنكسار الأوتوبيس ألفضائي فائق التكلفه وألتعقيد بعكس الطائرات الحرببه !،
Tenho minhas dúvidas/curiosidades : essas asas é uma peça inteira que passa pelo corpo do avião? Se são duas ! Como é feita a fixação já que suportam tanto peso ? Se alguém puder me responder agradeço 👍
Kebanyakan engine,pateng crantel..lagian apa sayapnya nggak bisa patah menopang berar engine yg bgitu banyak dn berat..gak aero dinamis..masih ganteng an TU 160 BLACK JACK..
Aux USA ils aiment les grandes voiture, les grandes maisons, les grands espaces, les grands esprits : tout est grand, même les avions... Ils ont bien raison, c'est juste le contraire de l'Europe, ici, tout est petit..
Na verdade, não. Esses motores eram os mais potentes da época e realmente foi necessário equipá-lo com 8 motores já que essa besta ultrapassava mais de 200 toneladas de peso máximo de decolagem
The mass of the aircraft has nothing whatever to do with it needing 8 engines to get aloft . One GE 90 would lift it off the ground with ease. The reason it has 8 engines is mostly due to some aspects of redundancy, but chiefly because of its control surfaces ..in other words it is a flying school bus with relatively 90 pound weakling wings . It should have been retired a few years after it was built replaced by something better , faster and more cost effective . Switching to a 4 or 2 engine configuration cannot be done because of the wings , they cannot take the localized stress of less in number but more powerful engines . Irrespective of all improvements made to it since it production began , including the recent proposed Rolls Royce engine swaps, the remaining 74 in active service from the 742 units made can only do their job of carpet bombing, if the rest of the Air Force has established air superiority in the region where this flying school bus is to be used . The only county on this planet that cannot shoot it down when it is totally unescorted is, ... BURUNDI ...anywhere else it would become a pile of smoldering melted aluminum scrap .the Fact that it still flies is a testament to the power of the MILITARY COMPLEX LOBBY and the nepotism that keeps them flush with taxpayer dollars whether or not it is a flying school bus or a giant duck.
Weil die USA zu diesem Zeitpunkt der Entwicklung der B52 keine Stärken Triebwerke hatten. Es gibt Flugzeuge die Schwerer sind und haben nur Vier Triebwerke oder auch nur Zwei. TU 160 und TU 22 M3
国内ニュースばかり見てると、こういった最新技術を見ることはないのです。
これだけのものを飛ばす技術力に脱帽します。
Excellent!!!!!
MUCHA VANIDAD, POCA BRAVURA.
What a blessed mind!!!!!! Really Great!!!!
Fantastic
Beautiful
I am going to buy one of those.
Die B-52 ist ein gigantisches Wunderwerk. Sie hat ihren Erstflug bereits am 15. April 1952 mit Erfolg absolviert und ist heute immer noch militärisch gefragter denn je.
Dieses Flugzeug hat enorm große Start- und Landeklappen und die werden nur an "Haken" gehalten. Wie ist das möglich?! Heute werden dafür mehrere, unter den
Tragflächen angebrachte, aerodynamische Führungen gebraucht!
I was on Diego Garcia ain't nothing like this beast taking off at night 😤
سيذكر التاريخ ان هذه الطائرة قصفت شعب العراق البرئ تماما من شبهة الحادي عشر من سبتمبر. لاشئ يدعو الامريكان للفخر
Super Bellisimo!!!
wonderful engineering in US B 52 bomber , C 17 & Black hawk #👍👍
Mudah-mudahan kita bisa buat pesawat lebih canggih... Aamiiin 🤲🤲🤲
Great video. This plane is also known as the "Buff".
Huge flying birds, and made of metal, impress
My father flew on those aircraft as a tail gunner in the actual tail. He retired when they transitioned to E, F, G & H models as the gunner sat up with the rest of the crew. He had no desire to be in a position to be the designated go for for the crew and liked the isolated position of the tail gunner in the tail. Don't worry he flew in many aircraft including the B-26 and many in-between.
At unstick (when it leaves the ground), the BUFF weighs 488,000 pounds with a full fuel load or fuel plus bomb load. That means for start, taxi, and takeoff roll, it weighs around 512,000 pounds to start with and burns 24,000 pounds of fuel to arrive at the 488,000 pounds at unstick. Those are the numbers for the B52G I flew during VietNam and the cold war. The B52H is the only model flying now and may have different numbers.
There are bigger and heavier transport planes that have only (only?) four engines. The C5 Galaxy comes to mind.
Seen a B52 fly, what an amazing aircraft! I have seen one on static display at RIAT & in the American Air Museum at Imperial War Museum Duxford. An amazing aircraft to see
4:10,,, PURA MARAVILLA DE LOS CIELOS,,,, ✈️🇺🇲💪👍👌
maravilla yanqui que lleva destrucion al mundo
تعيش.امريكا.حسوني.البيرطاني
Good
b 52 and much more. snookered again.
Don't forget that the B-36 had 10 engines and was larger, although didn't carry as much bomb load.
6 turnin’ and 4 burnin’. 😎
9:21 amazing
人类有史以来载弹量和火力最为强大的巨型轰炸机！
好厉害啊。👍
This is God's blessed air force because they only trust in God.
Fond memories of the "B52" at KI Sawyer AFB in the upper peninsula my squadron provided (AGE) equipment to the bomber flightline
AGE=AEROSPACE GROUND EQUIPMENT...WOW...GREAT MEMORIES....72ND FMS. Field Maintenance Squadron
..
@@fidellaboy-negron5816 I lived in the FMS barracks " The Hole" is what we called it
I remember ki sawyer personally, we were stationed there a long time ago .
By we I mean my father. Almost lost a few fingers due to frostbite.
___ESSE AVIÃO NÃO PRESTA !!!!!!!!!!!
الله اكبر
لا اله الا الله
اشهد ان لا اله الا الله
واشهد ان محمد رسول الله
Pesawat bikin polusi udara..
Yeah, the reason it has 8 "turbo jets / with a low bypass ratio" is that they are not very powerful . Look at todays C5 Galaxy it only has four hi bypass " turbo fans." And its huge.
Remember, these engines were designed about 50yr ago .
No. It's because they didn't have big enough jet engines in the 1950s when the plane was designed. They have big enough jet engines today so it could be refitted with 4 jet engines.
Even just two.
love POUTINE
🇺🇸🇬🇪🇺🇸🇬🇪🇺🇸🇬🇪 ღმერთი ფარავდეს ამერიკას საუკუნიდან საუკუნამდე ამინ.
BAD ASS! 🇺🇸👍🙏
Having refueled many of these, it takes more than an hour to fill them up with JP4.
Vietnam shoots like hot cakes
B.52Why is there so much black smoke when accelerating the old tech-of engine is obsolete?
El Antonov An- 225 aún es más grande con una longitud de 84 metros y una altura de 11 metros y solo vuela con 6 motores...
It seems that this aircraft model was also built to pollute the atmosphere as much as possible.
In spite of its 8 jet engines, the B-52 also needed JATO bottles to assist with take off when heavily loaded. The aircraft first flew at Boeing's Everett Field in 1954 and is still in service, today -- almost 70 years later. Man, that makes me feel old!
That was the B-47 that used the JATO bottles to help get off the ground. The non-fan B-52's did have to rely on water injection to boost engine thrust. The H models have more powerful TF33 fanjets.
I watched it too. But I thought it was from Boeing Field in Seattle. I saw it either on KOMO or KING TV and the chase car was a four door ford;.
@@earlsmall9808 Yes, I think you're right, Earl. Did they build a special field in Seattle just for the B-52? Or was it for the 747? I know both required a longer runway.
I saw the first flight of the B-52 in the summer of 1954. It came from Boeing Field in Everett, Wash. It had a B-47 as a chase plane and also a delta-winged fighter plane. It never retracted its landing gear on that flight and it flew very slowly in a loop around Tacoma. I keep hearing that its first flight was in 1952, but I don't think that's correct. In that same summer, Boeing's Dash 80, the prototype of the 707, first flew. Its pilot, Tex Johnston, put it through his famous barrel-roll maneuvers over the Sea Fair crowd at Lake Washington.
Those C-17’s are so large, they sometimes seem to just hang in the sky.
I was up on a hill with a camcorder, when a C-17 circled around me at very low altitude, heading for a landing approach at our Mahlon Sweet Field. It seemed to be going so slow, I couldn't help but wonder what was holding it in the air. I got some good video footage of it and was glad that it made a safe, uneventful landing.
فى الجو ينخفض الظغط الجوى او يرتفع لهذا ينصح بتناول الحلوه فتوزع المظيفات الحلوه على المسافرين حيث يسمعغ المسافر طنين فى اذنيه وعندما تقلع الطائه يقول القبطان "نرجو ربط الاحزمه" وكذالك فى الهبوط والطائرات تسير بالمحركات النفاثه حيث تنفث الريح من مؤخرتها وهذا يدفعها للامام على ما اعتقد ..هذا كل ما اعرفه عن الطائرات حيث انى عندى خبره فى السفر على الطائرات الظخمه مثل البوينغ
I wonder why they don't convert the buff to turbofans
開発してから既に６０年も経つ飛行機がまだ現役時代活躍しているのは喜ぶべきか悲しむべきか？
それにしても爆弾を満載してもしっかり離陸出来るように、エンジンは８基だし主翼は大きく作られている。
I'm afraid the plane's wings will break because they can't withstand the heavy weight of the jet engines
The B 36 needed 10
If smokes is primitive technology!!
had a b-52 modle the wing spand was bigger then my door
👍👍👍
target in the sky 😂
Tools of hegemony that all
The notes at the beginning are not correct. The B36 was made by Convair, not Boeing. Also, the B-36 was much larger than the B29.
B52
I can’t imagine how loud that aircraft actually sounds
8p😅⅕😮0
Gede mana dg Antonov ?
hey guys! Could you turn on the subtitles? My father speaks Spanish, I made the settings, but they don't work unless you activate them, so they can reach more views and I mean everyone, the languages, thank you!
Este chico grandulon esta bien preparado para llevar sus "regalitos" a donde haya malosos pasados de lanza !!!!😎✈👏✈👏✈👏😎👏😎👏✈👏✈👏😎👏😎👏😎👏
But do they serve drinks in first class?
17’000lbs = hairdryer, no wonder it requires 8 of these. The GE9X has 105’000lbs each…
👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
While a fully loaded A380 (575 tons) can take off with 4 engines, this B52H weighing under 90 tons should be able to take off with only 2 engines. These 8 engines must be related to something else. Headline of the video says it's about the bigness but it doesn't make sense.
4e3
@@garisalva5463 What do you mean with that? I didn't get it.
O sea que primero lo construyeron tan grande y después se dieron cuenta que necesitaban ocho motores...?
👍👍👍👌👌👌
عساها بلهجام شنو هذولي الغرب يصنعون طائرات حربية لايذاء الشعوب وتدميرها الله ينتقم منهم طالما يريدون إيذاء الاوطان
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
🇺🇸🇬🇪🇺🇸🇬🇪🇺🇸🇬🇪👍👍👍🛫🛫🛫 B 52 C 17 ცის მეფებია.
Son 8 motores pero son pequeños
هي متصله في بعضها الأجنحه علشان تحتمل الوزن الثقيل من القنابل ثقيلة الوزن فيه قنابل كلها شضايا حديد صلب ثقيل الوزن وفيه تزن اطنان مقارنه في حجمها وطايرة ال شحن العملاقه جلكسي أجنحتها متصلها في بعضها ولكنها فيه ٤محركات مرعبه وبسرعه تشق الفضا.. بعكس طايرات الركاب أجنحتها ليست متصله في بعضها وهذا يتطلب تكلفه من الالميوم الصلب المضاف اليه مواد معالجه صعب الأنكسار الأوتوبيس ألفضائي فائق التكلفه وألتعقيد بعكس الطائرات الحرببه !،
...a world, an international Society, without military...and all the crushing expense and stupid toys...
Devorador de combustível....
Tenho minhas dúvidas/curiosidades : essas asas é uma peça inteira que passa pelo corpo do avião? Se são duas ! Como é feita a fixação já que suportam tanto peso ? Se alguém puder me responder agradeço 👍
Antonov 225 o maior e mais pesado ,mais capacidade de carga ✈️
horizonte sempre plano e nivelado em meus amigos do The Daily Aviation , nunca tem curvatura , deve ser porque a terra é plana mesmo ,kkk ,🤩🤩🤩😲😲😲
عاد السدة شد في السدة ابت😅
Kebanyakan engine,pateng crantel..lagian apa sayapnya nggak bisa patah menopang berar engine yg bgitu banyak dn berat..gak aero dinamis..masih ganteng an TU 160 BLACK JACK..
Hagan algo para la paz
❤🌷👍
Aux USA ils aiment les grandes voiture, les grandes maisons, les grands espaces, les grands esprits : tout est grand, même les avions... Ils ont bien raison, c'est juste le contraire de l'Europe, ici, tout est petit..
Il consomme combien de litres au 100 ?😂😂😅😅
Is there anything we cultivate more,,, spend time,,, resources,,, and the giving of our sons. Besides WAR,,,
A nation can pay for their army or they can pay for their conqueror's army. Choose wisely.
porque no esta en castellano
Yes mais c'est un vieux truc
Nao.
Nada disso.
Redundância ao extremo.
Tem que ir e voltar.
Se estragarem 2 ainda terá 6.
Confiabilidade.
Na verdade, não. Esses motores eram os mais potentes da época e realmente foi necessário equipá-lo com 8 motores já que essa besta ultrapassava mais de 200 toneladas de peso máximo de decolagem
Pra que esse exagero?
En español
Muy desagradable pues esta hecho para destruir vidas . Donde está la virtud ?
Hey taxpayers ... it costs you $60,000 per minute all in to fly a B-52
So 3.6 million an hr I call bs
666
U.S.A 🤎🤎🤎🤎🤎 from R.Kosova
The mass of the aircraft has nothing whatever to do with it needing 8 engines to get aloft . One GE 90 would lift it off the ground with ease. The reason it has 8 engines is mostly due to some aspects of redundancy, but chiefly because of its control surfaces ..in other words it is a flying school bus with relatively 90 pound weakling wings . It should have been retired a few years after it was built replaced by something better , faster and more cost effective . Switching to a 4 or 2 engine configuration cannot be done because of the wings , they cannot take the localized stress of less in number but more powerful engines . Irrespective of all improvements made to it since it production began , including the recent proposed Rolls Royce engine swaps, the remaining 74 in active service from the 742 units made can only do their job of carpet bombing, if the rest of the Air Force has established air superiority in the region where this flying school bus is to be used .
The only county on this planet that cannot shoot it down when it is totally unescorted is, ... BURUNDI ...anywhere else it would become a pile of smoldering melted aluminum scrap .the Fact that it still flies is a testament to the power of the MILITARY COMPLEX LOBBY and the nepotism that keeps them flush with taxpayer dollars whether or not it is a flying school bus or a giant duck.
It has 8 engines but they actually aren’t that powerful… Only about 17,000 lbs of thrust each. The 747 engines make like 65,000 lbs of thrust each.
Weil die USA zu diesem Zeitpunkt der Entwicklung der B52 keine Stärken Triebwerke hatten. Es gibt Flugzeuge die Schwerer sind und haben nur Vier Triebwerke oder auch nur Zwei. TU 160 und TU 22 M3
Ya el antonov no existe...
richtig und diese 8 Triebwerke brauchen noch einmal ganze 12 um richtig starten zu können. Halt ein Ami-Bomber, lol!
Hello my friend👌😊😊🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸👏👏✊👍👍🙏🙏🙏🤠🤠🤠🤠