Richter always followed the composer instructions, and I like it this way. But I guess Mozart often played it faster, just to show off. I feel he was that kind of musician :)
Piano lessons, Boulder Actually not quite, we have metronome markings left by Czerny(who studied with beethoven) and Moscheles, both of whom wrote q=132. this is about q=116
Questo primo movimento é interpretato magnificamente. Vorrei dire ...ogni nota ha senso! Un suono magnifico, ritmo i calzante, drammaticità e malinconia assieme. Qui c'è il DESTINO che marcia e travolge la vita, qualche momento di luce. Richter rende benissimo tutto questo
Exactly in this tempo I am playing this piece. It's losing all its power and pain when you play it too fast, Imo. But I think he is getting a bit faster...
мне нравится его игра!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
In one of his letters Mozart said;the most important in piano playing is the thempo...it is so difficult to have the right thempo and to don't loos it.Make the lines smood. Every single peace played from Svjatoslav is for me the absolute perfection. I always enjoy to listen different interpretations and again and again is Svjatoslav the best!
Richter somehow thought he didn't have quite the touch for Mozart. This was not false modesty. He really believed it. Also, Beethoven's à posteriori influence on Mozart playing is often a revelation, like here. Beethoven's revolution has an influence on interpreters of works composed before and after him. Sort of like Paganini for the violin.
I agree with Richter. His playimg is heavy. He never expressed the joie de vivre and sponteneity of Mozarrt. He plays Mozart like a comedian telling a joke written for him that he doesn't quite get.
Richter is a great pianist, one of the greatest, but this interpretation of his, is very personal, for he plays reading he ends up playing some parts a little different to what is really written, i mean mostly when it comes down to pauses, or longer notes that he plays, for example sometimes its crotchet and he plays quaver and so on. Not criticizing who am I do to so ? I'm just saying this for students who end up watching this video and just copying the way he plays.
I appreciate playing according to personal thoughts and feelings, which goes with the flow - the way how music should be. there is not right nor wrong unless you try to be
I’m studying this piece now and I don’t see any instance in which Richter plays anything other than what’s written. Can you provide some specific examples of what you think is incorrect in his performance? I think he does a brilliant rendition.
Shootokill nice remark, well mozart wrote this in his early age when his mother died so it’s one of his dramatic works which is quiet rare in the mozart encyclopedia
Am I the only one surprised by the little amount of light he plays with ? I mean, I often play with a weak lightning but usually professionals don't show that.
Richter never really liked concerts or even recordings - he was very very nervous, so he played with as little lighting as possible, so that it feels more like a "private" rendition. Also he tends to rush quite a bit because of that, but honestly that's what a "Richter rendition" just is and it's what made him famous - his fire - together with his at that time much envied technical skill.
+PredatorTomW addition: Funnily enough here he played some parts very "metronomical" which conveyed the majestic feeling very well; it's great! It's the "late" richter anyways, so he wasn't as nervous anymore, I guess.
Speaking only for myself, the first movement played at the perfect tempo at which it should be played.
Richter always followed the composer instructions, and I like it this way. But I guess Mozart often played it faster, just to show off. I feel he was that kind of musician :)
Piano lessons, Boulder Actually not quite, we have metronome markings left by Czerny(who studied with beethoven) and Moscheles, both of whom wrote q=132.
this is about q=116
You are so right !
pls say this to my piano teacher
Please show her this video ! Sviatoslav Richter is one of the greats ! :) And thank you for your charming comment :)
Questo primo movimento é interpretato magnificamente. Vorrei dire ...ogni nota ha senso! Un suono magnifico, ritmo i calzante, drammaticità e malinconia assieme. Qui c'è il DESTINO che marcia e travolge la vita, qualche momento di luce. Richter rende benissimo tutto questo
great.!..way more majestic not so fast!
il grandissimo RIchter,quale sublime interpretazione,la leggera sbavatura in una nota sul finale non la considero nemmeno,bravissimo!
The first time I hear mozart played really Forte and aggressively and it doens't sound bad, all the oposite, this sounds GORGEOUS!
jajaja te he visto en varios videos
Tamalito Zhuculenthoso genial :D Amo la música clásica
*****
Que bueno , al igual que yo ;)
De que país eres?
Tamalito Zhuculenthoso España
+Apetecan7
yo de México
por cierto apetecan es por chincheto o que significa?
Almost sounds like he's playing Chopin. Really amazing
Exactly in this tempo I am playing this piece. It's losing all its power and pain when you play it too fast, Imo. But I think he is getting a bit faster...
I am listening and enjoying as I do with all of the versions from the different Pianist interpretations. Bravo! Can't wait to finish this.
Самый замечательный темп для первой части.
мне нравится его игра!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
In one of his letters Mozart said;the most important in piano playing is the thempo...it is so difficult to have the right thempo and to don't loos it.Make the lines smood. Every single peace played from Svjatoslav is for me the absolute perfection. I always enjoy to listen different interpretations and again and again is Svjatoslav the best!
"Thempo"? What's that, a combination of Theme and Tempo?
Очень красиво,оригинально и волшебно
Makes me cry every time.
Really!
he was really a giant of the piano music...
that enormous hands can be so softly and gentle.. only Richter can play with such a delicate touch ❤️
매번 들을때마다 놀랍고 경이롭고 가슴이 감동으로 벅차오르네요....그러면서 엄청 슬픈 느낌...
Richter somehow thought he didn't have quite the touch for Mozart. This was not false modesty. He really believed it. Also, Beethoven's à posteriori influence on Mozart playing is often a revelation, like here. Beethoven's revolution has an influence on interpreters of works composed before and after him. Sort of like Paganini for the violin.
I agree with Richter. His playimg is heavy. He never expressed the joie de vivre and sponteneity of Mozarrt. He plays Mozart like a comedian telling a joke written for him that he doesn't quite get.
De las favoritas y con Richter ,mejor ,grade de su tiempo
incredible interpretation
for me this is the best of Mozart because it is most close to Beethoven
That is a very dumb way of thinking.
I like very much this version because more dramatical and intense with this tempo.
Wow! very 👍 good!!
Richter is a great pianist, one of the greatest, but this interpretation of his, is very personal, for he plays reading he ends up playing some parts a little different to what is really written, i mean mostly when it comes down to pauses, or longer notes that he plays, for example sometimes its crotchet and he plays quaver and so on. Not criticizing who am I do to so ? I'm just saying this for students who end up watching this video and just copying the way he plays.
agree! I recommend Gilels for this piece.
I appreciate playing according to personal thoughts and feelings, which goes with the flow - the way how music should be.
there is not right nor wrong unless you try to be
I’m studying this piece now and I don’t see any instance in which Richter plays anything other than what’s written. Can you provide some specific examples of what you think is incorrect in his performance? I think he does a brilliant rendition.
Dit zijn de mooiste pianohanden ooit
slow for my taste! im playing this and i wish it was so slow
Wie wunderbar Richter hier spielt: Alles ist perfekt, Tempo, Artikulation, Charakter der Musik - einfach fantastisch!
Very good interpretation.
Daniel Maia Yes
Daniel Maia indeed
Yes
Sapphira Tan Hello babe😉
+Daniel Maia Hi 🙂
increible interpretacion!
A mi no me gustó :(
+SIR REZHA
por que no te agrado ?
Mozart. Splendido Mozart
lo stile cristallino penetrante di richter... uno straordinario genio... per me inarrivabile
I tried this piece and there's too many grace notes! The left hand for 1:35 is like impossible for me lol
OMG .....pure Vertigo.....the best pianist ever
i wish i was so good!!
bravo!
Bobão
Really doesn't sound like Mozart most of the time does it? Almost an early version of beethovens style
Shootokill nice remark, well mozart wrote this in his early age when his mother died so it’s one of his dramatic works which is quiet rare in the mozart encyclopedia
I love this song♥
Very good thank you
Muito bom, very good
it depends on your taste
💙
fire
A guardarlo sembra un impiegato delle poste un pò attempato. Poi suona e dici "Dio!" O_O
It is sooo slow, I cannot find any energy or angry! He plays very well but if faster, it will be perfect I think.
这不只用愤怒可以演绎，悲伤也是另一种方法。当然里赫特弹的是一般般就是了
于添锴 对的。感觉这首曲子的情绪杂揉好难表达。
Idk, i really like it at this tempo. I only started learning it, but I think the articulation is so clear when he plays it.
+yixin wang Watch remark-Allegro MAESTOSO...The speed is Perfect.
nothing wrong with that. get used to it.
Great
Hier wordt duidelijk dat Richter ook Mozart zeer liefdevol speelt.
q???!
ja Michaël dat vind ik ook
잘치신다♡♡
did i hear pedal used in this video?
Is this song supposed to play with pedal?
волшебник
I still need to practice for few years to do this
bravo, excellent video
Because that's how it should played.
LOL agli smorzatori-led
69 comentários 😏🙄
Am I the only one surprised by the little amount of light he plays with ? I mean, I often play with a weak lightning but usually professionals don't show that.
Richter never really liked concerts or even recordings - he was very very nervous, so he played with as little lighting as possible, so that it feels more like a "private" rendition. Also he tends to rush quite a bit because of that, but honestly that's what a "Richter rendition" just is and it's what made him famous - his fire - together with his at that time much envied technical skill.
+PredatorTomW addition: Funnily enough here he played some parts very "metronomical" which conveyed the majestic feeling very well; it's great! It's the "late" richter anyways, so he wasn't as nervous anymore, I guess.
Manca di energia
because it is indicated
Amazing!
good job
Super !!!
good
ahahaha è vero!
wow....
O no
Tried to do it failed completely lol
Did you try again? Can you play it now?
ㅎ
Splendida esecuzione, ma perché il grande Richter ha ancora bisogno dello spartito?
when can i be like him? excellent!!
Unnecessarily rushed but not so egregious as the Michael Bay--esque time-attack of a Barenboim, for example.
Nothing beats Lang Lang playing this,if you haven’t heard him, please do!
Nice but I prefer Mitsuko Uchida's. Her playing is wonderful!