This was incredibly useful in explaining a rule I previously thought I had a grasp of, but had actually been calling incorrectly! Thank you for the invaluable insight
Great clarifications. Nice logical flow of the written FIBA rules screenshot followed by live action replays with repeats & feature graphics to point out important aspects. Thank You!
Officiating is such a hard job, rarely praise for quality work, no shortage of criticism. I really like the idea of the inner circle in the paint, but of course it is more for the official to process in the moment. I believe that currently the NBA has a good groove on officiating while the college game struggles with consistency and game-flow.
33-5 at 10:06 is kind of a trick question in that until I read the last line of the interpretation, I did not get (at all) that player A1 was using his body to clear the path for A2. To me, without seeing that play develop, there’s a lot of “what was in A2’s mind” going on by the referee. Initially I would have said the scenario warranted a block call on B1, since they are in contact with the semi-circle AND A2 has met the either shoot or pass criteria. I hope the exam questions don’t expect officials to read into the question that A1 was clearing the path for A2. IMHO this question is poorly written.
I agree with you and typically they do not. It is a rare call and would probably only occur in obvious situations to eliminate abusing the rules. It would be under the same umbrella of gauging intent of a C3 UF rule
Great eye, because at the time, defender just had to have their feet on or outside the circle. Now you have to be fully outside for FIBA rules. Great spot
does 1 or 2 feet in contact with the area mean that if the defense jumps straight up inside the area (feet not in contact with the ground) , it's still a charge?
Great question, any airborne players position on the court is where they took off. So it would not result in a charge, however, plays like this would most likely be no calls and if there was an issue, it would be an off arm extension which would result in an offensive foul (as mentioned in the video :) )
This was incredibly useful in explaining a rule I previously thought I had a grasp of, but had actually been calling incorrectly! Thank you for the invaluable insight
Great clarifications. Nice logical flow of the written FIBA rules screenshot followed by live action replays with repeats & feature graphics to point out important aspects. Thank You!
Glad you enjoyed it!
Thank you. Very informative
nice video, excellent break down of the rule and criteria
Awesome video! Looking forward to more content. Keep up the good work.
Much love, g! Keep em commin!
Great video man, thanks for sharing it with us! like!
Very helpful, thanks a lot! Your work is very much appreciated.
Glad it was helpful!
Officiating is such a hard job, rarely praise for quality work, no shortage of criticism. I really like the idea of the inner circle in the paint, but of course it is more for the official to process in the moment. I believe that currently the NBA has a good groove on officiating while the college game struggles with consistency and game-flow.
very helpful! thanks
This is great!
Great explanation. Don't get run over!
great video. I subbed. The music is distracting. I would appreciate it being more quite or off entirely. Thank you
Noted!
33-5 at 10:06 is kind of a trick question in that until I read the last line of the interpretation, I did not get (at all) that player A1 was using his body to clear the path for A2. To me, without seeing that play develop, there’s a lot of “what was in A2’s mind” going on by the referee. Initially I would have said the scenario warranted a block call on B1, since they are in contact with the semi-circle AND A2 has met the either shoot or pass criteria. I hope the exam questions don’t expect officials to read into the question that A1 was clearing the path for A2. IMHO this question is poorly written.
I agree with you and typically they do not. It is a rare call and would probably only occur in obvious situations to eliminate abusing the rules. It would be under the same umbrella of gauging intent of a C3 UF rule
nice!
nice vid
Nice
12:15 i see defensive player step on the circle. So why he outside like you say in the video ?
Great eye, because at the time, defender just had to have their feet on or outside the circle. Now you have to be fully outside for FIBA rules. Great spot
Great for MHSAA basketball this year
does 1 or 2 feet in contact with the area mean that if the defense jumps straight up inside the area (feet not in contact with the ground) , it's still a charge?
Great question, any airborne players position on the court is where they took off. So it would not result in a charge, however, plays like this would most likely be no calls and if there was an issue, it would be an off arm extension which would result in an offensive foul (as mentioned in the video :) )
@@refereeuniversity thanks a lot for the clarification!! :)
@@jakubcygan8265 No problem!
What if there ain't no semi-circle on the court?
Then it is not in play
Wish i knew this when i was 16
Would you mind officiating a couple of game assignments with me?
I would definitely officiate with you but I am not located in Alberta!
Lots of flopping. Are these soccer players?
Nice..