Survivor Explained

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 11 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 17

  • @educ8rkp
    @educ8rkp 5 років тому +101

    The jury does NOT vote a person off when they get down to three.

    • @samkotoni3660
      @samkotoni3660 4 роки тому +3

      He doesn't explain it very well lmao

    • @samkotoni3660
      @samkotoni3660 4 роки тому +1

      That explanation is entirely wrong. Ppl can go to 3 tribes. There r twists. He never talks about immunity idols and lastly the jury doesn't vote someone out idiot.

  • @firety155
    @firety155 3 роки тому +28

    If you want to know how Survivor works, watch the video and then read the comments

  • @worthplayingfor2197
    @worthplayingfor2197 4 роки тому +30

    the jury doesn't vote someone out everything else is sort of accurate

  • @wilhelmjtard
    @wilhelmjtard 2 роки тому +5

    The only thing the jury really does is decide who wins, they do not vote out people

  • @relay3829
    @relay3829 5 років тому +21

    Wait, isn’t Jeff Probst the guy who wrote that book Stranded?

  • @MistaUnicorn
    @MistaUnicorn 3 роки тому +15

    While this is the general idea of the show, it is WAY oversimplified and some things are somewhat incorrect. The jury doesn't always start at the merge; sometimes it starts before, sometimes it starts after.. it just depends on what is decided for that season. The jury absolutely does not and has never in 40 seasons of Survivor ever voted out a player at the Final 3. That just isn't a thing. The jury has NEVER voted a player out of the game in general. There are twists in almost every season in the modern era of the show that changes how the players much think about the game and play it. There are often tribe swaps before the merge that mix the tribes around to try and force people to connect with others and jumble up the interpersonal connections between the players. There are immunity idols that players can find that negate votes cast against them if played correctly. There are other types of advantages that give certain players the upper hand if played to the best of its ability. There are sometimes 3 tribes instead of 2. Merge happens at inconsistent times (sometimes the players merge at 9, 10, 11, 12, or 13 players). People don't always vote based off of alliances and oftentimes you see players turning on their alliance if they think the have a better chance at winning without the said player(s) with them.
    Like I said, this does an alright job at explaining the original premise of the season, but it is nowhere near completely accurate and misses a bunch of key parts of the game that makes it so enjoyable to watch.

  • @rjtotal5912
    @rjtotal5912 6 років тому +17

    it is well explained but it's not necessarily 2 tribes. And it's not necessarily anyone who is voted out of the merged tribe becomes a member of the jury, as was the case in earlier seasons and has shown up in some later seasons as well. other than that I think this is a great video to make the public aware of such things. Good job.

  • @SpinTT37
    @SpinTT37 2 роки тому +1

    Lol my English teacher used this

  • @joejosephine6137
    @joejosephine6137 3 роки тому +1

    Take the the two states you know,
    To find where its winds blow.
    And when directions duel,
    Tribal won’t be cruel
    If you know how the sayings go.
    2QGcQHIMQBg

  • @paradoxyt1851
    @paradoxyt1851 7 років тому +12

    Well explained

  • @rod42000
    @rod42000 4 роки тому

    Thanks

  • @telepork
    @telepork Рік тому

    Does anyone know where i can find more about this?

  • @drewlmao
    @drewlmao 3 роки тому +1

    this is pretty inaccurate