Jordan's the only one (along with Juice Media, Michael West and Alan Austin) that tell the truth about the stark difference between the Coalition and Labor. And for all the UAP trolls, your 'hero' Craig Kelly was in the government that passed legislation allowing the government to break encryption, and to edit your online data.
Sir, When will start 489 visa grant for offshore? Almost 30 month waiting...so much frustrate. Invitation Date:-23/7/2019 Lodge Date:-21/9/2019 Medical:-14/2/2020 Police Clearance Certificate:-20/2/2020 State sponsership:-South Australia Occupation:-Software Engineer
All politicians need to remember the people voted them in, so why do lobby groupsand corporations dictate policy. Why do so may corporations pay mo tax. Ans some politicians have accounts in tax havens?
@@jimbobcharles2782 hmm, ok. I can understand your view given Dan Andrews' democratic dictatorship adventurism. I suspect that a Fed gov't will be different - but tbh I do wonder - and I grew up under Labor, and thought very highly of them - but now think they are missing the big thinkers like Bob and Keating (love him or loath him) who both trusted the public to intelligently assess what they said, and in turn earned the public's trust. I've voted for minor parties and independents for the past (I'm guessing) 15 years (for what its worth) as I've not been happy with either side if viewing politics through a two party lens. An objective assessment of economic stewardship doesn't really corroborate with a view that the Coalition is better than Labor. In fact by many measures the Coalition has been far worse overall, post WW2. Both sides have a checkered history - but Labor less so. Considering big idea type politics, it's generally Labor that has a track record of being the nation builder. Libs have run the place like a business, with not much of a long-term strategy, and mocked the public's intelligence with reductive binary logic and divisive slogans. Perhaps the Coalition has been right to use reductive binary slogans if the average voter is gullible enough to swallow the propaganda, as perhaps it's kept them in power (if power is the objective); or maybe they've been in power as long as they have because there are no inspirational leaders that effectively capture the public's imagination.
@@andrewdegozaru74 sorry I disagree with you on Andrew’s, he was only trying to save lives from a viral-pandemic caused by (in this country) an incompetent superstition/magical believing prime minister! I am roll-playing Devil’s-advocate here, I have witnessed the labor party lose so many elections as a result of incompetence in providing fuel for the propaganda machine of the coal-ition. The labor party need to smarten/toughen up and not create ammunition for propaganda !
@@jimbobcharles2782 that's ok, and your right. I I tend to agree with your assessment of his objective, but not his means, or demeanour towards constituents. I prefer inclusive politics (yes, somewhat idealistic). Wisdom of the crowd and history will be the judge. Most important is we can have a civil dialogue, accept different opinions respectfully, and ultimately have a means of self determination (within reason). The crowd will ultimately define what side of reasonable Dan is on. One thing for sure is that it's a complex topic.
Mostly a good ad, but get rid of the "he lied to world leaders" part. You DO NOT want to EVER appear to be putting a foreign leader (except maybe Obama or QE2) above our own, particularly a French President.
Number 9 on God's list. "Thou shalt not bare false witness". I'm a committed socialist and an atheist and I've got more hope of going to heaven than Scott. Assuming it exists of coarse.
Keep drinking the kool aid, don’t waste a drop! It’s good for you! Do what big government tells you! They are more honest and protective than your parents ! Also you should bend your knee to the labour god and pledge your soul if you say you are sooooo commuted to the filth….
@@jakeyt8462 Just be a kid. The problem with children and politics is how much they're swayed by their parents. Me included. My parents were and still are massive Liberal supporters, and I drank their Koolaid. Make sure you do your own research, make sure you aren't merely repeating what your parents say.
Have you ever been in Australia or ever been an Australian resident or citizen? The Australian Labor Party ain't the US Democratic Party. Labor ain't perfect but unlike the Democrats, Labor has a history (and a recent history) of achieving for the people such as universal healthcare, industrial arrangements that mean our minimum wage is over $20 p/h, and they rejected our involvement in the Iraq War. If you are aware of all this, then fine, I respect that you have made an informed opinion. But I am not sure what Kyle Kulinski teaches about Australian politics.
@@Banana_Split_Cream_Buns no no, he's got a point, since unlike the US, we have preferential voting. As long as you preference Labor above the Liberals, in the majority of seats, the outcome will be the same as voting for Labor, however, you will still have given your first preference to a party that better represents you.
Its makes no difference both these socio outfits want your every move controlled. they want you to lose everything you own and be happy. ( they dont really care about the happy)
NO, and never have.
He is, and most of the coalition, born liers. Watch friendlyjordies videos on him.
Jordan's the only one (along with Juice Media, Michael West and Alan Austin) that tell the truth about the stark difference between the Coalition and Labor.
And for all the UAP trolls, your 'hero' Craig Kelly was in the government that passed legislation allowing the government to break encryption, and to edit your online data.
It should be to clear to everybody, Morrison is only interested in the bloody $600k salary, and not in actually helping Australia get ahead.
Why wouldn’t he retire and get the 200k a year pension
I did not shit my pants at a Mac Donald’s in 1997, I don’t know what their talking about
Wouldn't trust him as far as I could throw him
Of course we can't trust him. Anytime he opens his mouth he's bound to be lying.
you never could
Still? I have never trusted him...
Can you trust Scott Morrison?
Short Answer: No
Long Answer: N-o
No no just no
Long Answer: Absolutely fucking not.
First. Give em it
have not trusted , as I knew he is not trustable
Yeah just like how Albo lied about what he was doing in the Dulwich hill massage parlour cheating on his wife
Never trusted him in the first place!
Sir, When will start 489 visa grant for offshore? Almost 30 month waiting...so much frustrate.
Invitation Date:-23/7/2019
Lodge Date:-21/9/2019
Medical:-14/2/2020
Police Clearance Certificate:-20/2/2020
State sponsership:-South Australia
Occupation:-Software Engineer
Given this a labor party youtube page, and they have not held government in 9 years, they wouldnt know. No can they do anything at the moment
A vote for labour is a vote for Chinna
Better ad would be, "did you ever really trust?" :)
All politicians need to remember the people voted them in, so why do lobby groupsand corporations dictate policy. Why do so may corporations pay mo tax. Ans some politicians have accounts in tax havens?
How come you can't comment on the UAP and LNP UA-cam channels? Thought they were the big "Freedom of speech" parties.
"Can you STILL trist Scott Morrison?" Wrong question. Could we EVER trust him is more pertinent. And there is a clear historical answer: NO
Sure can. I would trust Morrison over Two Way Albo. Biggest policy, a national driver's licence. Lol
Libs national UAP and one nation are all pathetic there liars
no back off
Still? What do you mean, still?
No is the simple answer.
No
Tell us what the definition of a woman is labor.
In a word NO
NO !!!! YOU ARENT TO BE TRUSTED EITHER !!!!
What about Daniel Andrews?
Rather a Lying Scotty than Trust the labor party !
Honest question, why?
@@andrewdegozaru74 communists who can only ruin the economy
@@jimbobcharles2782 hmm, ok. I can understand your view given Dan Andrews' democratic dictatorship adventurism. I suspect that a Fed gov't will be different - but tbh I do wonder - and I grew up under Labor, and thought very highly of them - but now think they are missing the big thinkers like Bob and Keating (love him or loath him) who both trusted the public to intelligently assess what they said, and in turn earned the public's trust. I've voted for minor parties and independents for the past (I'm guessing) 15 years (for what its worth) as I've not been happy with either side if viewing politics through a two party lens.
An objective assessment of economic stewardship doesn't really corroborate with a view that the Coalition is better than Labor. In fact by many measures the Coalition has been far worse overall, post WW2. Both sides have a checkered history - but Labor less so. Considering big idea type politics, it's generally Labor that has a track record of being the nation builder. Libs have run the place like a business, with not much of a long-term strategy, and mocked the public's intelligence with reductive binary logic and divisive slogans. Perhaps the Coalition has been right to use reductive binary slogans if the average voter is gullible enough to swallow the propaganda, as perhaps it's kept them in power (if power is the objective); or maybe they've been in power as long as they have because there are no inspirational leaders that effectively capture the public's imagination.
@@andrewdegozaru74 sorry I disagree with you on Andrew’s, he was only trying to save lives from a viral-pandemic caused by (in this country) an incompetent superstition/magical believing prime minister!
I am roll-playing Devil’s-advocate here, I have witnessed the labor party lose so many elections as a result of incompetence in providing fuel for the propaganda machine of the coal-ition.
The labor party need to smarten/toughen up and not create ammunition for propaganda !
@@jimbobcharles2782 that's ok, and your right. I I tend to agree with your assessment of his objective, but not his means, or demeanour towards constituents. I prefer inclusive politics (yes, somewhat idealistic). Wisdom of the crowd and history will be the judge. Most important is we can have a civil dialogue, accept different opinions respectfully, and ultimately have a means of self determination (within reason). The crowd will ultimately define what side of reasonable Dan is on. One thing for sure is that it's a complex topic.
Just looked at liberal you tube channel you cannot comment on any videos.
Liberal fans who watch the youtube channel would be mad, votes may be turned around
NO Dont trust any of you.
Mostly a good ad, but get rid of the "he lied to world leaders" part. You DO NOT want to EVER appear to be putting a foreign leader (except maybe Obama or QE2) above our own, particularly a French President.
Better to tell the truth about him in this case and have him replaced
Rubbish
The US presidents are the only ones you should use in an argument.
Macron has more credibility in his little finger than the liar from the shire
Number 9 on God's list. "Thou shalt not bare false witness". I'm a committed socialist and an atheist and I've got more hope of going to heaven than Scott. Assuming it exists of coarse.
I’m like you, I’m currently 14 and thinking about getting into politics later on in life to fix this country.
Keep drinking the kool aid, don’t waste a drop! It’s good for you! Do what big government tells you! They are more honest and protective than your parents ! Also you should bend your knee to the labour god and pledge your soul if you say you are sooooo commuted to the filth….
@@negruvalea It seems like you could have benefited from a socialist education system, because it seems your English is lacking.
@@jakeyt8462 Just be a kid. The problem with children and politics is how much they're swayed by their parents. Me included. My parents were and still are massive Liberal supporters, and I drank their Koolaid. Make sure you do your own research, make sure you aren't merely repeating what your parents say.
I'm an atheist who doesn't give a shit about Christian doctrine but I'll pretend to care if it proves me right.
I'd say about as much as you can trust anyone in Labor
Do you know for sure that all people in Labor lie as often as Scott does?
Ah yes, the party that tried being more honest in 2019, wants an ICAC now, has better voting records federally, and is literally tied with *unions*
How can we trust you and trust Anthony Albanese that he wasn’t lying about that? Just saying
ibera
Go Scomo!!!!🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺
A comedian
I think he means please be gone Scomo.
Don’t give up your day job. Oh wait this is your day job.
@@pagnol5509 says you in the middle of the day 🤣
Vote 1 for the Greens. I would if I weren’t born and raised in Missouri and still living here.
Have you ever been in Australia or ever been an Australian resident or citizen? The Australian Labor Party ain't the US Democratic Party. Labor ain't perfect but unlike the Democrats, Labor has a history (and a recent history) of achieving for the people such as universal healthcare, industrial arrangements that mean our minimum wage is over $20 p/h, and they rejected our involvement in the Iraq War.
If you are aware of all this, then fine, I respect that you have made an informed opinion. But I am not sure what Kyle Kulinski teaches about Australian politics.
@@Banana_Split_Cream_Buns no no, he's got a point, since unlike the US, we have preferential voting. As long as you preference Labor above the Liberals, in the majority of seats, the outcome will be the same as voting for Labor, however, you will still have given your first preference to a party that better represents you.
@@Banana_Split_Cream_Buns it's karl
I'm prefrencing labor 1st
Labor above others.
Hell no but you lot are just as bad
UAP all the way
Don’t give up your day job. Oh wait this is your day job.
@@pagnol5509 what a stupid reply
Its makes no difference both these socio outfits want your every move controlled. they want you to lose everything you own and be happy. ( they dont really care about the happy)