It was terrible to see the damage NATO inflicted on the Red Army within a day of fighting. With my simple estimates, the Red Army probably lost from at least 3,000 to a maximum of 10,000 soldiers and countless military equipment. Just for ONE DAY. While NATO's losses were... a few tanks were slightly damaged by bullets and less than 80 soldiers were injured or killed.
dude I am watching your editing skills develop and develop and you are learning so damn fast. Keep it up, if you continue at the rate you are with your content quality I can see you getting 100k subs by the end of 2024
I really enjoy seeing such clean gameplay. I sometimes get triggered into playing games when watching someone making tons of mistakes and knowing I can do it better. No such risk here :)
Its kinda surprising that we haven't seen a single T-72 yet. We have seen every generation of Soviet MBT except for that one and the T-64. I don't expect to see T-64s though.
Soviet T-72 regiments and divisions were "Category B" battlegroups which were meant to be deployed in the later stages of a conventional war. The East Germans would've used them more extensively during the first stages of the war, though not on the Fulda Gap.
I'm really enjoying these videos, love seeing the very active artillery use. One thing I'm curious about, since you're doing no losses challenge anyway, is there a reason to not use your leader units a lot more mixed in with your combat units to up their veterancy? e: for example switching out one of the regular tanks with a command tank in each group. Even your artillery can be boosted like this by just having a M577 or something following them around.
Thanks, the leader units are the primary targets for the AI. so usually i don't use them in combat except if there is a need for them in offensive. but instead, i use unarmed command unit or infantry to hide them from threat so i can defend without worrying or being confused for their safety.
Loving the videos, especially how your editing style is improving rapidly. I have a suggestion though. Because there's no voice over, I would really appreciate if you could add some text occasionally to explain your thinking, especially on the strategic map.
What is your process for developing tactical positioning? I can see you incorporate combined arms theory excellently but does it boil down to you brute-force trying each level until you find the right tactic? Great content!
Hey there, great videos man, been binge watching most of your WARNO playlists so far, there's a lot to learn from. One thing has been bugging my mind tho, while trying to replicate your strategy. How do you predict the AI movements so well, that you can time your arty shots almost perfectly?
Thanks, By moving the camera forward on the map you can hear the armor engine. Ovetime by getting used to armor speed and artillery timing you can estimate the approximate spot.
Can you imagine just how revered the 11th ACR would be with these casualty rates, there would be movies made and books written about them for decades.
" This is a story you'll tell your grandchildren "
It was terrible to see the damage NATO inflicted on the Red Army within a day of fighting. With my simple estimates, the Red Army probably lost from at least 3,000 to a maximum of 10,000 soldiers and countless military equipment. Just for ONE DAY. While NATO's losses were... a few tanks were slightly damaged by bullets and less than 80 soldiers were injured or killed.
Those 80 soldiers are all Sergeant Highway
@@wolfseye14 Gunny Highway never dies.
@@GeriatricBullFrog he's just entirely scar tissue and anger problems at this point
@@wolfseye14 I'm pretty sure that's all he was in the 80's, too, lol. It's based off "Heartbreak Ridge".
@GeriatricBullFrog that makes a lot of sense, it didn't even occur to me as I completely forgot the film existed!
dude I am watching your editing skills develop and develop and you are learning so damn fast. Keep it up, if you continue at the rate you are with your content quality I can see you getting 100k subs by the end of 2024
Thanks for the compliment ✌
I really enjoy seeing such clean gameplay. I sometimes get triggered into playing games when watching someone making tons of mistakes and knowing I can do it better. No such risk here :)
@@foome36 thanks :)
Loved the intro
Thanks, glad you like it
My division was tasked to hold the fulda in case of war all expectations was 10 hours tops then what remained to pull back.
With tank being repaired in a matter of minutes you guys could have done it. I am sure!
The intros just keep getting better! 🔥🔥🔥
Like and good video.👍👍 Great job dude.
thank you very much
Its kinda surprising that we haven't seen a single T-72 yet. We have seen every generation of Soviet MBT except for that one and the T-64. I don't expect to see T-64s though.
Soviet T-72 regiments and divisions were "Category B" battlegroups which were meant to be deployed in the later stages of a conventional war. The East Germans would've used them more extensively during the first stages of the war, though not on the Fulda Gap.
If there is bad Kissingen then where is good Kissingen?
good question
Keep em coming🙏🏽
love the intro.
but i must say i am sad to wait two week again.
I'm sorry for that, I'll try make things faster as I can.
@@thenewchallenger1 you do enough !!! this is really high Quality entertainment
@@elenorfighter2190 thank you very much ❤
I'm really enjoying these videos, love seeing the very active artillery use.
One thing I'm curious about, since you're doing no losses challenge anyway, is there a reason to not use your leader units a lot more mixed in with your combat units to up their veterancy? e: for example switching out one of the regular tanks with a command tank in each group.
Even your artillery can be boosted like this by just having a M577 or something following them around.
Thanks,
the leader units are the primary targets for the AI. so usually i don't use them in combat except if there is a need for them in offensive. but instead, i use unarmed command unit or infantry to hide them from threat so i can defend without worrying or being confused for their safety.
What defending in Hearts Of Iron 4 feels like.
lets go!!!
Nice!
Hell yeah
Loving the videos, especially how your editing style is improving rapidly. I have a suggestion though. Because there's no voice over, I would really appreciate if you could add some text occasionally to explain your thinking, especially on the strategic map.
@@authmastasly thanks,
Okay I'll make sure to add explanation. Or maybe making a strategy briefing on tactical maps.
What is your process for developing tactical positioning? I can see you incorporate combined arms theory excellently but does it boil down to you brute-force trying each level until you find the right tactic? Great content!
Cool intro
Thanks
Good episode. Now waiting for the Pact video
Of course ;)
@@thenewchallenger1 it will arrive as usual (8 days)?
@@БабайАлибабаев yeah if not less than that, it depends on how long it takes me to finish it + editing
Hey there, great videos man, been binge watching most of your WARNO playlists so far, there's a lot to learn from. One thing has been bugging my mind tho, while trying to replicate your strategy. How do you predict the AI movements so well, that you can time your arty shots almost perfectly?
Thanks,
By moving the camera forward on the map you can hear the armor engine.
Ovetime by getting used to armor speed and artillery timing you can estimate the approximate spot.
@@thenewchallenger1 Oh, that explains things. :D Thanks a lot! Keep up the good work!