FCC vs HCP stacking example

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 вер 2020
  • Metals are made up of close-packed structures. Consider a hexagonal close-packed layer. You can add atoms on the next layers up. Where you choose to start these layers determines whether you form FCC face-centered cubic or HCP hexagonal close-packed crystal structures. In this demonstration we show you ABA stacking vs ABC packing and visualize the cubic crystal structure with tennis balls.
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 68

  • @FearNoSteel
    @FearNoSteel 2 роки тому +19

    Man, this channel is gold, no one else has this kind of energy and passion for explaining this stuff in a easy to understand way. Thank you

  • @harshams7580
    @harshams7580 Рік тому +12

    This is probably the best demonstration of the topic.. I’m a class 12 student and this really helped me understand the topic.. thank you so much!!!

  • @mr.chindo8570
    @mr.chindo8570 Рік тому +9

    Thanks for putting so much effort to show us illustration... Greatly appreciated

  • @assguardian5511
    @assguardian5511 2 роки тому +6

    Iv been searchig for this from last 2hours ,trying to undertand how is CCP same as fcc.
    ur explanation was the best.
    thanks alot.

  • @siawonderswhy
    @siawonderswhy 3 роки тому +7

    literally the best visualitsation ever. thanks

    • @TaylorSparks
      @TaylorSparks  3 роки тому +1

      Woohoo! So glad to help.

    • @meixuanxiao2776
      @meixuanxiao2776 2 роки тому +1

      @@TaylorSparks Thank you so much! Best video of crystals

  • @varshinilolla3090
    @varshinilolla3090 4 місяці тому +1

    0:02 I've been literally scratching my head trying to understand the similarity between hcp adn fcc although my book didn't suggest so. Finally after coming back home this is a relief and definetly a good night sleep!
    Thanks for vid, really grateful

    • @TaylorSparks
      @TaylorSparks  4 місяці тому +1

      Right? So fun to see it click

  • @abdulkadirbiffo8937
    @abdulkadirbiffo8937 2 роки тому +4

    wow!
    nice illustration, Taylor! it sparks!!

  • @Karansingh-og9wh
    @Karansingh-og9wh 3 місяці тому +2

    Thanks mate,you saved me.

  • @aizhili4465
    @aizhili4465 2 роки тому +1

    thanks for this nice illustration

  • @iftekherahmmed4138
    @iftekherahmmed4138 Рік тому +1

    i needed exactly this video , thanks mr. taylor

  • @edwardrhodes4403
    @edwardrhodes4403 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you! The diagrmas and animations I have seen didn't explain it nearly as well!

  • @anubala2850
    @anubala2850 9 місяців тому +1

    Ohhh DANG! You were soo good at that man.... Thanks a lot

  • @fadilahmed8055
    @fadilahmed8055 Рік тому +2

    Thank u sir u really cleared my confusion...

  • @hardiksingh330
    @hardiksingh330 3 роки тому +3

    Wow that makes so much more sense👍👌

    • @TaylorSparks
      @TaylorSparks  3 роки тому

      Right!? So simple when you can see a physical model.

  • @gautam50aditya
    @gautam50aditya 2 роки тому +1

    Amazed 👏 all cleared
    ....

  • @visheshsaxena6199
    @visheshsaxena6199 Рік тому +1

    super awesome! best visualization ever!

    • @TaylorSparks
      @TaylorSparks  Рік тому +1

      Right? This never made sense to me until I actually made the model myself

    • @visheshsaxena6199
      @visheshsaxena6199 Рік тому +1

      @@TaylorSparks Yes! I am a PhD student and have to regularly work with close packed structures. We have marbles in our lab that we can place on a square or a hexagonal surface. but these tennis balls have a better visualization

  • @anmolvashistha2366
    @anmolvashistha2366 Рік тому

    Thanks man this was really helpful

  • @muskanasudani729
    @muskanasudani729 2 роки тому

    this is such a great video

  • @AbhishekSingh-yn9dw
    @AbhishekSingh-yn9dw 4 місяці тому +2

    Thank you so much sir

  • @TanveerAlam-oe7yt
    @TanveerAlam-oe7yt Рік тому +1

    Wow! For such a passion...

  • @andreis8100
    @andreis8100 Рік тому +1

    Amazing! Now it seems obvious after watching this.

  • @riyatailor2088
    @riyatailor2088 2 роки тому +1

    Really thanks a lot....now my all doubt are cleared only bcz of u.....

  • @arhamjain4527
    @arhamjain4527 Рік тому

    Wow that was very nice

  • @yashinani297
    @yashinani297 Рік тому +1

    Very easy visualisation op!,!!!

  • @angelfabian2202
    @angelfabian2202 8 місяців тому

    wow beautiful!

  • @missfly4406
    @missfly4406 2 роки тому +1

    At last! Someone used those balls! I didn't have that many balls and I was searching on the internet high and low that I should stumble upon some video that would visualise the thing with balls.

  • @boncoderz1430
    @boncoderz1430 Рік тому +1

    Real really well made, thank you, i have a question
    Question what happens at 1:40 when you place dark green at truangular voids pointing "down"? Thanks again!

    • @m.pranith8499
      @m.pranith8499 Рік тому

      the same cubic close packing comes ,cuz where you place the second layer does not matter.both ccp and hcp depends on the placement of the third layer

  • @mr.e-soul
    @mr.e-soul Рік тому +1

    Amazing....

  • @user-gf5xl4xf5z
    @user-gf5xl4xf5z 11 місяців тому +1

    the last few seconds comes a aha moment for me, when u switched the green ball to demo both structures. Thank you so much. I wonder why they cut up HCP lattice straight up but cut up FCC lattice sideways...

    • @vd9570
      @vd9570 10 місяців тому +1

      so that the unit cell becomes predictable,
      A unit cell must repeat itself in all directions but if they cut it like the hcp, there will be no regular pattern to the unit cell
      you could argue that we can make the unit cell of 6 storeys so that it repeats that would instead make it more cumbersome to study

  • @sanjanupadhyay4650
    @sanjanupadhyay4650 2 роки тому +1

    Nobody can explain better best

  • @15-manikkamv56
    @15-manikkamv56 Рік тому +1

    Awesome 👏

  • @user-ls6yl6re7d
    @user-ls6yl6re7d 5 місяців тому +1

    thanks a lot

  • @sullyh1034
    @sullyh1034 2 роки тому

    Could you do the same thing but showing a dislocation please?

  • @user-il6yj5mv5y
    @user-il6yj5mv5y 4 місяці тому +2

    I definitely recommend this for the people confused with the imagination part short but yet concise and clear, for all those searching the visualisation/difference between hexagonal closed packing and cubic close packing, here is ur solution

  • @JoaoBarbosa1996
    @JoaoBarbosa1996 3 роки тому +17

    could you kindly go into the past and replace my material science professors? thanks

    • @TaylorSparks
      @TaylorSparks  3 роки тому +12

      Hahaha. I will do my best. The time machine is probably going to require some new materials development.

    • @JoaoBarbosa1996
      @JoaoBarbosa1996 3 роки тому +1

      ​@@TaylorSparks get cracking then

    • @15-manikkamv56
      @15-manikkamv56 Рік тому

      🤣

  • @shahilkazi2900
    @shahilkazi2900 3 роки тому +1

    woahhhhhh

  • @thomashunt8596
    @thomashunt8596 8 місяців тому +1

    killer

  • @arjunsurya3628
    @arjunsurya3628 2 роки тому +1

    like this vid

  • @samaksh6561
    @samaksh6561 Рік тому

    damnnn i can see the fcc now

    • @TaylorSparks
      @TaylorSparks  Рік тому +1

      Right!?! For years people said that it was just a matter of stacking and I could never quite see it and then when I built the model myself and colored in the corners all the sudden I could see it pretty clearly.

  • @ahsanashfaq4430
    @ahsanashfaq4430 2 роки тому +1

    this is a big oooooh moment

    • @TaylorSparks
      @TaylorSparks  2 роки тому +1

      Right!? So cool to finally see it.

  • @harshsoni794
    @harshsoni794 2 роки тому

    You gotta have the balls to do this

  • @tejesveechauhan254
    @tejesveechauhan254 Рік тому +1

    voice too low

    • @TaylorSparks
      @TaylorSparks  Рік тому

      Yeah, I don't know what the deal was with this video. It's usually much better on my other ones