First time teaching E&M and this video helped me not lose all credibility with my kids! I can now walk them through why different charge densities on ends of irregular conductor. Keep up the great work, it's much appreciated
Wonderful! I am so glad I am able to help you out like that. I remember my first time teaching E&M. Woah, it was rough. I have more E&M videos, in case you need more help. And best of luck this year. You've got this!! www.flippingphysics.com/ap-physics-c.html#em
Looks good here too. I would kind of prefer the very last statement to be made in the other order, since it lightly implies a causal relationship in the wrong direction, but I don't think it needs to be corrected. Especially since you had just said it the other way around.
Excellent video! Is there a reason why you used a cylindrical Gaussian surface and local linearity to find the electric field around a spherical charge distribution, rather than using a spherical Gaussian surface around the entire sphere? Both methods work and give the same result, but this method seems more complicated than it needs to be. Using the spherical surface just outside the surface of the conductor has the added benefit of showing where the inverse square law comes from in Coulomb's Law (and Newton's Law of Gravitation) whenever we have used the "point particle model" (or whenever we have spherical symmetry) and directly links Coulomb constant "k," to the factor of 4π and the permittivity of free space.
Yes, in my video "Electric Flux and Gauss' Law", I do exactly what you describe: www.flippingphysics.com/apcem-electric-flux-gauss-law.html The point in this video is not "to find the electric field around a spherical charge distribution", but rather to prove that the electric field just outside the surface of any conductor in electrostatic equilibrium equals the local surface charge density over permittivity of free space.
@@FlippingPhysics I love all of your videos, but I don't think you realize how annoying the intro actually is and how many ppl loathe it. I would greatly appreciate it if you changed it as well, or at least consider changing it. Thanks.
I actually hear from plenty of people how much they love my Flipping Physics jingle. At this point I am not going to change it. I am sorry you loathe it.
First time teaching E&M and this video helped me not lose all credibility with my kids! I can now walk them through why different charge densities on ends of irregular conductor. Keep up the great work, it's much appreciated
Wonderful! I am so glad I am able to help you out like that. I remember my first time teaching E&M. Woah, it was rough. I have more E&M videos, in case you need more help. And best of luck this year. You've got this!! www.flippingphysics.com/ap-physics-c.html#em
Was pleasantly surprised to see your video "Introduction to Torque" recommended in my mech-engineering uni course today!
Keep up the awesome work :D
Thanks, will do!
hell yeah, get to use this to study instead of the boring ap classroom videos LETS GOOOO
Glad to help you out!
Looks good here too. I would kind of prefer the very last statement to be made in the other order, since it lightly implies a causal relationship in the wrong direction, but I don't think it needs to be corrected. Especially since you had just said it the other way around.
Thanks. I had noticed that, however, I did not think it was worth the amount of time it would take to change.
Love these Videos!
Excellent video! Is there a reason why you used a cylindrical Gaussian surface and local linearity to find the electric field around a spherical charge distribution, rather than using a spherical Gaussian surface around the entire sphere? Both methods work and give the same result, but this method seems more complicated than it needs to be. Using the spherical surface just outside the surface of the conductor has the added benefit of showing where the inverse square law comes from in Coulomb's Law (and Newton's Law of Gravitation) whenever we have used the "point particle model" (or whenever we have spherical symmetry) and directly links Coulomb constant "k," to the factor of 4π and the permittivity of free space.
Yes, in my video "Electric Flux and Gauss' Law", I do exactly what you describe:
www.flippingphysics.com/apcem-electric-flux-gauss-law.html
The point in this video is not "to find the electric field around a spherical charge distribution", but rather to prove that the electric field just outside the surface of any conductor in electrostatic equilibrium equals the local surface charge density over permittivity of free space.
@@FlippingPhysics Oh right, jolly good then. (Typed with a British accent) I always wanted to say that.
this is incredible
You are amazing. Thank youu! 🙏
Looks good to me!
Thank you so much for previewing.
I know there has been a lot lately and I truly do appreciate it.
@@FlippingPhysics I'm happy you're making so much stuff I can help with!
Please can you make an Arabic translite in you videos
I wish. If only I had the funds...
If you can English, why would you not do it yourself?
bruh is it just me or is the intro song bloody annoying lol
It's just you
@FlippingPhysics I beg to differ. The intro is really annoying. It makes my ears bleed every time I hear it. Please change it.
No thanks. Sorry to hear your ears bleed. Might want to get that checked out.
@@FlippingPhysics I love all of your videos, but I don't think you realize how annoying the intro actually is and how many ppl loathe it. I would greatly appreciate it if you changed it as well, or at least consider changing it. Thanks.
I actually hear from plenty of people how much they love my Flipping Physics jingle. At this point I am not going to change it. I am sorry you loathe it.