Utterly the Best 8 Lenses WITHOUT Compare: Nikkor, Fujifilm, Zeiss, Voigtlander, Tokina

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 лип 2016
  • Utterly the Best 8 Lenses WITHOUT Compare: Nikkor, Fujifilm, Zeiss, Voigtlander, Tokina
    IF YOU LIKE THESE VIDEOS, YOU CAN MAKE A NICE DONATION OF $2 OR $5 VIA PAYPAL TO EMAIL: kenw111@insightbb.com

КОМЕНТАРІ • 224

  • @afiskandar
    @afiskandar 5 років тому +29

    1) Nikkor 20mm 1.8G
    2) Nikkor 300mm 2.8 AiS
    3) Fuji 16mm 1.4
    4) Voigtlander 58mm 1.4 Nokton
    5) Tokina 100mm 2.8 Macro
    6) Zeiss 35mm 2.0 Distagon
    7) Nikkor 60mm 2.8D Micro
    8) Nikkor 105mm 2.0 DC

  • @bunkerbunt3390
    @bunkerbunt3390 5 років тому +125

    4:00 16mm f1.4 FUJI
    2:05 20mm f1.8 G NIKKOR - Astro | Cityscape | Landscape lens
    7:22 35mm f2 Zeiss DISTAGON- best lense I've ever used
    5:15 58mm f1.4 VOIGTLÄNDER Nokton - off the scale!
    8:45 60mm f2.8 Macro NIKKOR - Perfect for Portraiture | Macro | Repro
    6:13 100mm f2.8 TOKINA - silk sex and sugar
    9:31 105mm f2 NIKKOR D focus control - THE portrait lense
    2:35 300mm f2.8 NIKON - Sports | Action | Wildlife | Portrait

  • @pawelhener5338
    @pawelhener5338 4 роки тому +9

    Regarding the wine alcohol evaluation: I work in the wine business and we went on a business trip to an Eastern European country for sales talk. So my wife and I had some meetings with prospective importers. In one meeting the purchase manager told us that vodka is 3x better than wine. When my wife asked him how so he just replied: wine 13% alc. - vodka 40%!
    Stay safe and healthy!

  • @SuperLitherland
    @SuperLitherland 8 років тому +61

    move the friggin mac off the table !!!!

  • @sonvfave
    @sonvfave 7 років тому +66

    why didnt you include so and so lens?

  • @alexmagor
    @alexmagor 4 роки тому +12

    Curious if this list has changed at all over the last 4 years

  • @jonfletcher147
    @jonfletcher147 8 років тому +2

    Ken, I did like you're clip on mic.....through my nice quality speakers you're sounding tinny......still love your daily posts! 😘

  • @lonnieclemens8028
    @lonnieclemens8028 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you for sharing this video Ken. I appreciate your advice.

  • @franciscomonrreal498
    @franciscomonrreal498 7 років тому

    Hey!!
    What kind of adapter do you recommend for the lens? Also I have a Nikon D5100

  • @JavierPhotoMX
    @JavierPhotoMX 5 років тому +3

    I have the 60mm and is perfect, sharp, fast, macro and lucky I got it for free when purchasing my d600 from Ebay. Now I found is one of the top 8 and I'm very impressed.

  • @daveeecortez1997
    @daveeecortez1997 7 років тому

    good info thanks...btw, what is the best pentax lens (portrait/landscape) again, thanks

  • @luckyjimenez6500
    @luckyjimenez6500 6 років тому

    Hi! Would like to know your opinion if the zeiss 35mm f2 distagon will be a good choice for a leica m240 plus adapter versus the current native 35mm lenses for the m240. Thank you

  • @canislupus2661
    @canislupus2661 4 роки тому +1

    Hey Ken! Which of these lenses would you recommend to use on the Fuji X system? Is this list still accurate or would you replace the Tokina with the 80mm Fuji Macro for example? (you named it "best macro lens ever produced in your guide :-)) - I'm unfortunately on a budget but also quite disappointed by anything thats not exceptional. Thanks for your help and have a good day!

  • @DT1592796
    @DT1592796 2 роки тому +1

    Hello Ken, I know that this is an old post but hopefully you will see my question (fingers crossed). I've recently come across a Topcor 58 1.4 (selling for approx 500USD) which according to some people sources was what the Voigtlander 58 1.4 Nokton was based upon. How similar are the two in terms of optical quality and for the price would you consider this a good deal worth considering?

  • @westernpacific8805
    @westernpacific8805 7 років тому +2

    Is your Japanese Tokina worker related to Arnie?
    I love these lens nerd vids, keep it up!

  • @jasonhernandez2733
    @jasonhernandez2733 3 роки тому

    Hey Ken, have you used the Zeiss 35mm f2 on your Fuji? I'm interested in buying one to use on my Nikon F3 film camera as well as my Xt20 but I don't know if I'll enjoy the cropped FOV especially at the size the lens would be

  • @moaxcym
    @moaxcym 2 роки тому +1

    Great video, can you please tell me which adapter I need to get to adapt the Ziess Distagon 35 f2 to my Fuji camera? I tried out an old Nikon FX (g) to fuji adapter, and it doesn't fit properly.

  • @tristanlinke921
    @tristanlinke921 6 років тому +1

    Does it make sense to put the Zeiss Distagon 35mm on a fuji in favor of their native lenses?

  • @ibrahimziazadeh2797
    @ibrahimziazadeh2797 4 роки тому

    Thanks for your great review. I have the zeiss 35/2, 50/1.4 and 85/1.4. Which lens should I use if I can do a x3 zoomed on a closeup shot (of eyes), almost macro? (instead of buying a zeiss 100mm or 135mm apo sonnar which is very expensive).

  • @OdO_Gee
    @OdO_Gee 5 років тому +1

    Took your advice on the Nikkor 20-35 2.8 and was pleasantly surprised! Everything you said about it was true!

  • @salvajejardin
    @salvajejardin 6 років тому

    35mm F2 Zeiss Distagon vs 35mm F2 Loxia (Biogon)...
    Is there any relationship?
    What is your opinion of the 35mm Loxia?
    Thanks!

  • @Noealz
    @Noealz 5 років тому

    I love all your older lens videos

  • @BS2Dos
    @BS2Dos 5 років тому +1

    Just ordered a Voigtlander 58mm largely on the strength of this + Ken’s other reviews. Can’t wait.

    • @chrisbanbury
      @chrisbanbury 3 роки тому

      That lens will make you look like a genius. It love the light, it loves color, it loves the dark.

  • @philippe21R
    @philippe21R 8 років тому +2

    Following your advice, I recently bought the Tokina and I couldn't be happier. Thank you!

    • @kathodosdotcom
      @kathodosdotcom  8 років тому +3

      now THATS what makes me happy!!! youre like person 10,000 that bought that lens off my vids.
      youd think TOkina would send me a pizza or something by now!! hahaahahah!!
      Im gald youre happy!!! :) that lens is a pile of fun

    • @philippe21R
      @philippe21R 8 років тому +2

      Tokina owes you a thousand pizzas!

    • @kathodosdotcom
      @kathodosdotcom  8 років тому +2

      they have no love for me :/

  • @EchelonDelta9
    @EchelonDelta9 8 років тому +3

    Is the Ziess Milvus 35mm f/2 not the same build quality as the Zeiss Distagon 35mm f/2? on the face of it, are identical on paper - Is there be a reason to seek out the discontinued Distagon over a Milvus?

    • @whateverrandomnumber
      @whateverrandomnumber 5 років тому

      EchelonDelta9 what paper? Design-wise, are they the same project? Nope. 35mm f/2 is too simple.
      I can't even understand if he's talking about the ZE or ZF version, for which mount and so on.

  • @donski170
    @donski170 8 років тому +29

    I have the Zeiss 35 and Tokina 100 due to your recommendations. Money well spent master.

    • @richie8811
      @richie8811 7 років тому +1

      Tell me about about Zeiss Distagon. I am seriously considering it. R u using it full frame?

    • @donski170
      @donski170 7 років тому

      Rick Grimes great lens on full frame Nikon D810. Super sharp!! Don't make the same lens anymore. Ken can tell you

    • @skimlord88
      @skimlord88 5 років тому

      @@richie8811 no, mostly half frame

    • @Ladybirdsin16mm
      @Ladybirdsin16mm 4 роки тому

      @@skimlord88 hahahaha

  • @ldyrtdyrt8872
    @ldyrtdyrt8872 6 років тому

    would you include the 105mm 1.8 ais if you updated this video?

  • @KennyRedSocks
    @KennyRedSocks 5 років тому

    Does the rendering of the 135mm DC differ much from the 105mm DC?

  • @deejxcel890
    @deejxcel890 6 років тому

    Out of the nikor 105mm or the 135mm which is better for portraits

  • @pakazzo
    @pakazzo Рік тому +2

    105 f2 D or 135 f2 D? I know they are built the same, but not sure what is the best reco. Thanks!

  • @svtk5104
    @svtk5104 Рік тому

    The ultimate video! Enjoyed it many times. Have already two of them. Still managing the finances for the third one .. :)

  • @toddroy9558
    @toddroy9558 7 років тому +1

    Hi Angry, I bought the tokina 100mm macro and I love it, thanks. I have a question about it. It's a 2.8, but in some lighting it won't go to 2.8, why?

    • @kathodosdotcom
      @kathodosdotcom  7 років тому +3

      cause macro front element goes way out front.....inverse square law :)

  • @w.harrison7277
    @w.harrison7277 4 роки тому

    I know you said compared to all lenses but please clarify, does the set of all lenses include all Leica lenses?

  • @cresk
    @cresk 6 років тому +1

    I just got a cheap old Panagor 2.8/90mm Macro and slapped it on my X-T2, which I think is a very nice lens for great macro / close-ups images. It may be cheaper than any of the macro lenses you recommded here.

  • @jimwest4862
    @jimwest4862 8 років тому +1

    ken
    would do a vid on table top photography?lenses tripods lighting dx fx please...

  • @themaskedsingercucucachu8225
    @themaskedsingercucucachu8225 4 роки тому +2

    I have not used these lenses, but he makes sense in terms of his criteria, so I accept his feelings about these lenses. However, the rendering of Leica lenses on Leica cameras is like no other. Expensive but worth it. Take care and thanks for the content.

  • @jhnnevin
    @jhnnevin 7 років тому

    Hi Ken, a quick question. Didnt see the voigtlander 58mm 1.4. is the Nikon 105 f2 DC better than the Voigtlander 58mm f1.4 SL II S?
    can you pls tell me keeping aside the focal length, only in terms of color rendition and sharpness! Thanks

    • @kathodosdotcom
      @kathodosdotcom  7 років тому +1

      the voigt is hair sharper.......the DC is the utter perfect portrait lens, but both are incredible

    • @jhnnevin
      @jhnnevin 7 років тому

      Theoria Apophasis Thanks Ken!

  • @BarbasMinecraft
    @BarbasMinecraft 8 років тому

    ken, can you do a video teaching how to edit well in lightroom?

  • @LEIGHPFOSI
    @LEIGHPFOSI 8 років тому +1

    Perhaps Mr. Dallat is referring to your subscriber number.? Thanks for this great video.

  • @whateverrandomnumber
    @whateverrandomnumber 5 років тому

    By the way, which version of the Zeiss 35/2 Distagon is he talking about?
    ZE, ZF.2? M-mount, F-Mount, are they all good or what?

    • @crismeman3386
      @crismeman3386 4 роки тому

      They are all made the same only the mount differs.

  • @glenho1335
    @glenho1335 3 роки тому +1

    Is it still good if you get the voigtlander 58mm f1.4 SL II-S Ais version?

  • @davidlowcher
    @davidlowcher 5 років тому

    Tokina ATX to Fuji X... what adapter?

  • @supdub1
    @supdub1 8 років тому

    i have an offer for Nikkor 200 F2 AIS, can you recommend that lens ? is it as good as the VR 1 version ?

    • @kathodosdotcom
      @kathodosdotcom  8 років тому +2

      that lens is always overpriced, its a very good lens, but not worth its usual asking price :/
      honestly the 180mm f2.8 is a better lens and is AF :) (and way cheaper)

  • @wookmon
    @wookmon 5 років тому

    Hi Ken! I just saw your video and I am thinking about getting Voigtlander nokton 58mm 1.4 for my fuji xpro2, which adapter do I need to get? Thanks a lot! You the man for camera and lens reviews, I really enjoy your UA-cam’s!

    • @kathodosdotcom
      @kathodosdotcom  5 років тому

      K&F adapter, ebay

    • @wookmon
      @wookmon 5 років тому

      Theoria Apophasis thank you so much!!!

  • @jganun
    @jganun 7 років тому

    No 100mm Zeiss Makro Planar ZF.2?

  • @kaboemb
    @kaboemb 8 років тому +2

    THANK YOU!!!

  • @jeffbrislane5782
    @jeffbrislane5782 7 років тому

    Hi Theoria, which Nikkor lens do you recommend for slide copying? You mention the 60mm macro here, would it be better than the 55mm? I was going to use the ES 1 and a flash.

    • @kathodosdotcom
      @kathodosdotcom  7 років тому

      60mm 2.8D
      copy slides ehhhh welcome to the year 1998

    • @jeffbrislane5782
      @jeffbrislane5782 7 років тому

      im assuming then that the 60mm will work fine with the ES-1?

  • @unclejake1476
    @unclejake1476 7 років тому

    Have you tried the sigma 20mm f1.4 art? Do you think the Nikon 20 f1.8 is better?

    • @kathodosdotcom
      @kathodosdotcom  7 років тому +1

      i dont touch sigmas junk :)

    • @unclejake1476
      @unclejake1476 7 років тому +3

      Theoria Apophasis so you don't even try them and they are somehow junk? lol

  • @ganstaboii2332
    @ganstaboii2332 4 роки тому

    Nikon 20mm f1.8 or sigma 20mm f1.4 art lens?

  • @victorstennis
    @victorstennis 6 років тому

    Is the 105 f2 DC hard to use on a fujifilm, compared to mitakon 85

  • @paulbeerman6736
    @paulbeerman6736 8 років тому

    Great video. Are we talking about the 60mm micro 2.8 G or 2.8 D as the one to buy?

    • @kathodosdotcom
      @kathodosdotcom  8 років тому +2

      the D…..the G version sucks

    • @kathodosdotcom
      @kathodosdotcom  8 років тому +1

      55 2.8 micro is a crotch pain of "fun" …..its a "pro" lens because it will spank you if you dont have hardcore MF love.
      no, the 60mm 2.8 D is the tits, and CHEAP, made in japan, used $200 all day
      buy THAT lens

  • @godofhope
    @godofhope 6 років тому +2

    Could you please make nice list?

  • @pranasvaraneckas7061
    @pranasvaraneckas7061 8 років тому +6

    I got Tokina 100 mm and it is the best lens in the world for me. It has something that I can not describe and that other lenses that I own/owned does not have. Amazing. So amazing. The only regred I have with it is that I did not got it earlier.

  • @BenM
    @BenM 7 років тому

    How fragile is the 20mm 1.8g?

    • @kathodosdotcom
      @kathodosdotcom  7 років тому +1

      i havent hammered any nails with it yet its tough enough

  • @komedybitspresents...600
    @komedybitspresents...600 7 років тому

    Carl Zeiss Jena 35mm f2.4 {Prakticar mount}, made in former East Germany. Paid the equivalent of 19.00 US in mint condition. Very happy with it.

  • @ramblinginmeath4950
    @ramblinginmeath4950 8 років тому

    Ken - Ive pulled the trigger on the 16mm Fuji .. hope to collect at the weekend and I love my Voightlander 40mm f/1.4
    Regards and keep away from those Pizza's their too nice
    Paul..
    ireland

  • @jeffreybeckstrand6665
    @jeffreybeckstrand6665 5 років тому

    In the 90s that 300mm f2.8 was my go to sports action lens on a Nikon f3

  • @nickathos7428
    @nickathos7428 5 років тому

    Has anybody used a tokina 28-70mm 2.8 atx pro?

  • @booghy9486
    @booghy9486 7 років тому

    Hello Ken,
    If you had to choose just 1 lens to use forever what would it be? :)
    Great Videos.

    • @kathodosdotcom
      @kathodosdotcom  7 років тому +1

      ahhhhhh 35mm f2 Zeiss distagon

    • @booghy9486
      @booghy9486 7 років тому

      Thank you for the reply, I just watched your video on that lens. :)

  • @JavierPhotoMX
    @JavierPhotoMX 5 років тому

    I have the 60mm 2.8 amazing! Use it on de for portrait

  • @LindyLooo99
    @LindyLooo99 7 років тому +2

    Well, I like your voice... especially your "voices".... You should do voice overs for cartoons, Disney, etc etc.. you have one of those voices. Haters will hate. Thanks for all the great information.

    • @KONAMAN100
      @KONAMAN100 6 років тому

      LindyLooo99 v good idea

    • @fredalbarran1012
      @fredalbarran1012 5 років тому

      He oughta do a ''dough!'', he already looks the part, which isn't bad.

  • @damianc80
    @damianc80 7 років тому

    What about Leica lenses?

  • @patrickvanbaarle3483
    @patrickvanbaarle3483 8 років тому +1

    So your saying the 135 dc is basically the same as the 105 dc but out of the 2 you picked the 105. 135 seems less practical and perhaps "to long" but on the other if you have the space I presume the 135 will give you a narrower DOF. So I am confused why 105 would get you a "better image" then the 135, what are your considerations picking the 105, Price? Practicality? Would there be a case when you would pick the 135 DC over the 105? Thanks

    • @kathodosdotcom
      @kathodosdotcom  8 років тому +2

      too long???? no, 300mm is a portrait lens too…..subject isolation is diff than DOF.
      no, the 105 is just a better portrait lens……price has nothing to do with it, i own both

  • @julioduenas9427
    @julioduenas9427 5 років тому

    For the last lens you mention two different focus 105 and 135. Which one is it?

    • @ryancooper3629
      @ryancooper3629 5 років тому

      He means either. They are both great for the same reasons.

  • @mooinabc1
    @mooinabc1 8 років тому

    The tokina 100mm how good is it in landscape photos? Thanks ken

    • @BenM
      @BenM 7 років тому

      godlike

    • @mooinabc1
      @mooinabc1 7 років тому

      thanks
      know we know a plus 10 lens for landscapes

    • @mooinabc1
      @mooinabc1 7 років тому

      Ken know tokina will have more oders.

  • @brandonin_ny
    @brandonin_ny 8 років тому +5

    Looks like I'm staring at a bunch of frog fur.

  • @BarbasMinecraft
    @BarbasMinecraft 8 років тому

    i don t understand. in the video you have the nikkor 135 f2 D or the 105?

    • @kathodosdotcom
      @kathodosdotcom  8 років тому

      the 105 F2
      both are pretty damn close and unique/awesome

    • @BarbasMinecraft
      @BarbasMinecraft 8 років тому

      you choose the 105 f2 because it is less expensive?

    • @kathodosdotcom
      @kathodosdotcom  8 років тому

      i own both…….i chose the best cause its the best

    • @kathodosdotcom
      @kathodosdotcom  8 років тому +1

      i commented on it, did U see it?

    • @BarbasMinecraft
      @BarbasMinecraft 8 років тому

      Now i see. Sorry. Thanks for you comment ;)

  • @polocash11
    @polocash11 3 роки тому +1

    Would a normal budget-minded person need the 58 and the 60?

  • @ningzhang3282
    @ningzhang3282 6 років тому +2

    I've bought 5 of these eight based mainly on your recommendations and I'm almost broke damn it! ~~

  • @jeffreybeckstrand6665
    @jeffreybeckstrand6665 5 років тому +1

    I would have to include the fuji 110mm f2 ... there's just something magical about that lens

  • @bleezyblake2010
    @bleezyblake2010 7 років тому

    I loved my Tokina 100. unfortunately the aperture diaphragm suddenly became stuck closed down all the way one day and rendered it useless :(

  • @hasanbokra
    @hasanbokra 6 років тому

    #TheoriaApophasis plz tell me best micro contrast lenses???? Any brands of any focal length

    • @kathodosdotcom
      @kathodosdotcom  6 років тому

      ive got nearly 40 vids on that topic

    • @hasanbokra
      @hasanbokra 6 років тому

      Theoria Apophasis can u list here

  • @James-lo5ne
    @James-lo5ne 8 років тому

    Have you ever had to deal with Nikon customer service? and if you, how was your experience?

  • @MrK67017
    @MrK67017 4 роки тому +2

    Honorable Mention: Nikon 105 F1.8mm AI-S.
    Pure mac and cheese.

  • @gm010379
    @gm010379 2 роки тому

    THANKYOU...

  • @AhmedMustafax
    @AhmedMustafax 8 років тому +5

    The prices on those lenses are about to go up again. :(

    • @DarrylCobb
      @DarrylCobb 8 років тому +2

      Every time I get ready to buy a 300mm f2.8, Ken makes a video mentioning it. ARRRGGGHHH!!!! lol

  • @mooinabc1
    @mooinabc1 8 років тому +1

    ken what about the fugi 35mm f2 is it tits plus?Reply•

    • @kathodosdotcom
      @kathodosdotcom  8 років тому +1

      it is, and faster AF and WR……….not the 1.4 of the 35mm 1.4…..but
      I've got both, the 35mm F2 Fuji is the must have pack everywhere lens most peeps have , and its cheap in price

  • @banditkiddy
    @banditkiddy 4 роки тому +1

    Just bought a Tokina 100mm f2.8 on your recommendation. :)

    • @lonnieclemens8028
      @lonnieclemens8028 3 роки тому

      Hi Derek, how is that Tokina 100mm working out for you? What camera are you using it on?

    • @banditkiddy
      @banditkiddy 3 роки тому

      @@lonnieclemens8028 D500, and it's fine. 👍

  • @1234510081
    @1234510081 8 років тому +1

    nikkor 105 or 135? For the same lens you give 2 # focal lengths

  • @peterpolak3135
    @peterpolak3135 7 років тому

    Wow.....who donated the Fujifilm shirt

  • @KatsumotoYT
    @KatsumotoYT 8 років тому +4

    The Cats Ass😂😂

  • @Geemodrums
    @Geemodrums 7 років тому +5

    I have the 60mm 2.8 micro.. and yes I NEVER remove it from my camera.. . it is just simply amazing. sample here:
    obtura.tumblr.com/post/150663008581/music-genius-wayne-tennant-by-german-moreno-shot

  • @mengjuexia5436
    @mengjuexia5436 8 років тому

    What about the Tamron 15-30

    • @kathodosdotcom
      @kathodosdotcom  8 років тому

      awesome lens, but it doesn't make the cut THESE lenses do

  • @dennisrubin4721
    @dennisrubin4721 8 років тому +6

    You need to name these as HALL OF FAME lenses

  • @nadantagaming2276
    @nadantagaming2276 2 роки тому +1

    🧐 200mm f2 maybe could have snuck in here…

  • @dean0falco
    @dean0falco 8 років тому

    i bought the tokina 100 2.8 but i also own nikkor 60 micro 2.8 and.i shoot macro with both of them... so my question is: is it possibe that nikkor hah sharper/more "crisp" images??? (not by much but still enugh to ask...) thank you for the anwser

    • @kathodosdotcom
      @kathodosdotcom  8 років тому

      it does, and its a repro lens, its even designed with resolution as PRIORITY

    • @dean0falco
      @dean0falco 8 років тому

      +Theoria Apophasis response for anwser is just amazing. dindnt even ecspect a response.. thank you... ;) i bought the 60mm off of your reccomendation... its the lens i use.70% of the time.. probbably gonna buy another one as spare :)
      im a tattoo artist. and another.question. wich lens would you recomend for a finish tattoo? (maybe a good topic for a video couse theres almostnnothing on the topic anyware)
      sorry for any misspels.. best regards.from Slovenija (not Slovakia) :)

    • @kathodosdotcom
      @kathodosdotcom  8 років тому

      yes, its the "swiss army knife" of lenses :) its not the lens but lighting angles, so you can shoot light under the 1st layer and reflect OFF the tattooed layer, shoot at about 30 off line of lens to tattoo.

    • @dean0falco
      @dean0falco 8 років тому

      +Theoria Apophasis yeah but wide angle vs telefoto compression... hmmm.. im always getting back to 60...... what about maybe polarizing filter???
      (i have a hoya hd cpl), as.for.the lights i have 2x 95+ cri led reflectors wich i usualy use am main light source for when im tattooing.
      ps. bought some more of your recomended lenses. i own tamron 15-30 2,8; nikkor 60 micro 2.8; tokina 100macro 2,8; nikon 70-200 vr2 2,8
      aaaaanddd.....
      tatadadammmm...
      Sigma 24mm (f)ART (im realy suprised and happy with the lens... regardles of your disslike heheheheh....... ;)

    • @dean0falco
      @dean0falco 8 років тому

      just one more last question... in the video you said dont ask to compare... but....: 58 nocton vs 60micro (being souch a simmilar focal lenght) regardless of macro or AF options. wich one would say is.more "crisp" (micro contrast, colour rendition, sharpnes.?)
      thank you so much and sorry if asked to many questions... ;)

  • @danielramones3992
    @danielramones3992 8 років тому

    Ken Rockwell says that the price you must pay for the 20mm 1.8 is not worth it considering the fact that you do not get that entire wide angle you should on dx. What do you think about that comment?

    • @kathodosdotcom
      @kathodosdotcom  8 років тому +3

      hes on crack

    • @nightdonutstudio
      @nightdonutstudio 8 років тому

      that is ultra wide for fx, who care about dx.

    • @chirag4
      @chirag4 8 років тому +1

      HAHAHAH !

    • @ohdaUtube
      @ohdaUtube 7 років тому

      +Kai Liu I care about dx (have the d7100). is it not a good buy for dx?

  • @ChallusMercer
    @ChallusMercer 8 років тому

    I got Tokina 100mm from your advice and it's amazing. The best 250€ i have ever spend!
    The Nikon 20mm f/1.8G AF-S is too expensive for me, could you maybe advice a cheaper alternative please?

    • @kathodosdotcom
      @kathodosdotcom  8 років тому +2

      that lens has no equal or even anything close to it

  • @beslemeto
    @beslemeto 5 років тому

    Squirrel on crack 😅.I absolutely agree with you.Why would i need AF lens for portrait when i can use 105mm f2.5 lens and get mind blowing results.I got 135mm F3.5MF,105 F2.5MF,50mm F1.8MF Pancake,Tokina 100mm Macro all due to your recommendations and i am more than hapy.I want that C.Z. 35mm Distagon ZF2,but it's very hard to find and it's very expensive.I don't know if it will worth the price since i have 35mm Nikon DX 1.8Respect big man!

  • @mp88mp88mp88mp88
    @mp88mp88mp88mp88 7 років тому +4

    squirrel on crack....excellent!!!!

  • @fxvsdx35
    @fxvsdx35 8 років тому +1

    Great collection, Ken.
    How about best buy "baker's dozen" (12+1). Let's say no more than $ 250 per lens. For people on tight budgets, or in cases someone needs to take the lens into a dirty or risky situation that may damage the lens.

  • @DarrylCobb
    @DarrylCobb 8 років тому +1

    I'm really enjoying the 105mm f2.5 so much I may by the Nikkor 105 f2 DC next year. I like that focal length alot. I do see an 85mm in my future though because I need the extra space to shoot half body in studio.

    • @kathodosdotcom
      @kathodosdotcom  8 років тому +1

      that lens isn't cheap anywhere! :)

    • @DarrylCobb
      @DarrylCobb 8 років тому

      Theoria Apophasis But it will be worth it. Somethings you just have to pay for.

  • @BabyBoomerChannel
    @BabyBoomerChannel 3 роки тому +1

    Bring back SHARPIE!

  • @GideonWassink
    @GideonWassink 8 років тому +1

    You forgot the AF 180mm 2.8😣

    • @kathodosdotcom
      @kathodosdotcom  8 років тому +5

      it doesn't make THIS cut

    • @nightdonutstudio
      @nightdonutstudio 8 років тому +1

      I bought it based on your recommendation. it is great overall. but when shoot backlit, contrast very washed out. worse than my other lens at this aspect. not a good lens shooting backlight.

  • @emanon321
    @emanon321 3 роки тому +1

    If the rating is 1-10 how can you say "above 10?" I guess you can because you did and it's your video. Show us your pictures!

  • @mooinabc1
    @mooinabc1 8 років тому

    ken what about the fugi 35mm f1.4 is it tits plus?

    • @kathodosdotcom
      @kathodosdotcom  8 років тому

      its noisy and slow as piss…..i own it…….so yes and no. :)

  • @619RobdoG
    @619RobdoG 8 років тому

    Had me til 60mm

    • @chrisvig123
      @chrisvig123 3 роки тому

      The 60 is amazing I’ve had mine since mid 90’s great lense on my D850

  • @reshamthapa1889
    @reshamthapa1889 2 роки тому

    this is the best don't argue with me...😂😂😂😂

  • @HenkLeerssen
    @HenkLeerssen 8 років тому

    all these lenses I use.. and I could not agree more with your opinion on all of these lenses. Only the voigtlander 58mm has some disturbing bokeh I have found. Sometimes to harsh for my taste. thinking about selling it. nikkor 50mm f1.2 gives more creamier bokeh as a general purpose lens. by the way you could test the sigma 20mm f1.8... very good as well. keep up the good work!

    • @kathodosdotcom
      @kathodosdotcom  8 років тому

      did you say sigma?……. the devils tools :)
      disturbing bokeh???? ROFL

    • @HenkLeerssen
      @HenkLeerssen 8 років тому

      +Theoria Apophasis haha really? why?

  • @violin-schwerin
    @violin-schwerin 8 років тому

    Yes, I'm sure the Tokina big shots have nothing at all to do...