The genre of this video is Hard Sarcasm. I like it, but I wouldn't share it because too many of my friends would get confused and go into existential crisis.
Ain't that the truth. It won't hit her until the day she hears her own words being used against her in a debate (But I was being sarcastic!). Or when some big Creationism/Climate Change Denier Convention asks her to be their Keynote Speaker.
Of course not but the context is misleading, claiming the opposite of the conclusion, which is obvious and her show therefore sarcasm, boring and waste of time.
cant do anything about climate change,its governed by the sun,you want to stop it,stop the sun,just wait till that solar flare hits,then,you got something to complain about..!!.we cant go to the moon,its inhabited,,so is mars..work it out..who cleans the rover,.it should of stopped yrs ago..
@Koala Dances well but in a million years even if there no humans you will see the difference, Sun will become bigger and bigger and temperatures will rise slowly but surely.
@in nxj Actually you’re wrong. CFCs caused a hole in the ozone layer and we stopped using them in the hole is going away. Humans have caused problems on earth and we have fixed a lot of them. But climate change has at least a dozen variables and scientist are clueless about each of them individually and even more clueless when it comes to their interaction together. The two things people use to prove man-made climate change is the hockey stick graph and models. Michael Mann manipulated the data when he created a hockey stick graph and that has been debunked and proven. The hockey stick graph is completely bogus. And for nearly 50 years to computer models using manipulated algorithms and manipulated data still can’t close to getting anything even remotely accurate. Man harm the environment? Absolutely. His man contributing to, change? Maybe. To some degree probably. But man is not causing climate change. And there is no, absolutely zero, proof or evidence to say otherwise. If it was people would believe it. If there was proof scientist would not manipulate the data and lie about it. That’s not what you do with the evidence is on your side. I suggest you read Bjorn Lomborg, Robert Bryce, Michael Shellenberger, and Judith Curry.
Notice the word "Nautics". That's because everything they do at NASA is under water... And they just produce fake videos and take your money. Pretty obvious when you look into it and stop accepting everything you hear at face value.
+Mason Lance for a second you say? I took me more than ten minutes to find that out, I have nearly thrown the biggest disliking hatful comment Internet has ever seen while I was boiling inside. At last minutes she turned fantastic! My apologies, Emily Calandrelli, sorry for thinking that you are the worst troubling creature crawling on Earth for whole long ten munutes. uuuuuh!
At 9 minutes her incredibly intelligent humour is so over-the-top that people miss it she's so smart that people miss it. Nothing but bell curves of understanding
OF COURSE shes not happy with man made global warming being DEBUNKED...AN MIT CRADUATE IN AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS....it PAYS for her to make sure we keep waisting time trying to change what the word of God says about creation...Humans can't control the universe GOD DOES...get over it "intellectuals"....the sun is causing the heating and cooling of the earth and causing the heating/cooling cycles ...Real independent scientists know this...mankind thinks far too much of ourself... OUR PART PLAYED IN CLIMATE CHANGE IS NEGLIGABLE...compared to the co2 that the earth and its natural proccess/animals emit! DONT BUY INTO THE LIE...DONT BELIEVE EVERTHING YOU HERE FROM MAINSTREAM "SCIENCE"... MOST HAVE PRIVATE/PERSONAL INTERESTS MIXED IN WITH SOME GOOD OLD FASHION SELF RIGHTEOUS SURFACE HEROICS... IN OTHER BETTER NEWS...YOU CAN REPENT OF YOUR SIN, TRUST THE GOD WHO DESIGNED AND MADE IT ALL AND BE SET FREE FROM LIES...LIVE IN TRUE REALITY. TRUST IN THE LORD JESUS TODAY BECSUSE TOMORROW ISNT PROMISED...SAD THING IS NUCLEAR WAR MIGHT BE THE ONLY THING THAT STOPS YOU LOOKING AT THE STARS AND FORCES YOU TO BOW THE KNEE TO THE STARMAKER. JESUS IS THE WAY, TRUTH AND LIFE AND NO SPACESHUTTLE CAN TAKE YOU TO HIM. REPENTANCE AND FAITH IN HIM IS THE ONLY HOPE FOR ALL MANKIND
@@jerbiebarb naaa, we might not reproduce as much as just a man but thats more cabin room for our great grandchildren lol. i hope our great grandchildren leave people like him behind. its a win win, they can be happy dying in denial, and the future of humanity will be sans the uneducated who think they know it all.
@Nidhogg Man... I came to this comment section to see what people thought, and a large amount of them missed the entire point of the video. You included -_-
In my humble opnion, we human beings are explorers by nature, we try to understand and get answers of everything that surrounds us, if we thought that way, we hadn't created airplanes, ships and so on to help us explore new places
this talk had a Poe's Law issue....Poe's Law: "without a clear indicator of the author's intent, parodies of extreme views will be mistaken by some readers or viewers for sincere expressions of the parodied views." she, obviously, was clear about her sarcasm but not until a certain point (which was the point, obviously).
If you didn't pick up on her being sarcastic after the first 3 minutes, you need to have your sarcasm detector checked. Poe's law shmoe's law. Learn to listen to people!
I have been so profoundly stunned by the amount of stupidity and ignorance among the world's population that she honestly nearly had me at the start there.
I'm sure everyone at first was like "This girl doesn't know what she's talking about", only the educated ones thought "Just hear her opinions, then make a judgement", to then realize, it actually is all sarcasm
I thought you were being silly, but my doctor told me this video gave me stage 2 brain cancer. Apparently the sarcasm was so heavy that my cells mutated. This lady needs to be more careful with her sarcasm, next time someone that cares about dying may be affected.
@@foobarmaximus3506 You know she was sarcastic the entire video, right? At the end she actually says why space exploration is important. Never judge a book by its over.
Knowing people holding opposite views to "big/high tech", "space exploration", and "global warming" will never open a video/article with these key words in it, she is exploring a new way. By presenting evidence/facts to "support" her opinion of the title, she finds a way to force people with opposite views to accept the facts. Sometimes when we accept a opinion blindly just because one authority said so, we don't go deep to search for evidence. By trying hard watching her video to find reason why space exploration is bad, viewer ends up knowing more facts of what's going on. This is pretty brilliant!
Yeah, she actually improved in her presentation a few minutes in, I'm not sure if it was nerves or just planning but it was defiantly worth the watch after the first few minutes.
I gotta give it to her, she has this special thing (besides her look) switching between the right information and beeing the cute girl. I bet she could run the world with her knowledge and charisma.
She pointing how hot was 2013 and is somehow completly unaware that "On Sept. 19, 2014, the five-day average of Antarctic sea ice extent exceeded 20 million square kilometers for the first time since 1979 (...) Sea ice surrounding Antarctica reached a new record high extent this year, covering more of the southern oceans than it has since scientists began a long-term satellite record to map sea ice extent in the late 1970s." you can easly find this data on official NASA web page... but hey they have explanation there why its normal as well as here she have why there can be more snow... and how satelite can prove that hummans have anything to do with climate change? How there is no proper scientific model to predict weather nex year, month or even next week but somehow people like her trying to convince you that she have PHD so she knows what she is talking about... on wikipedia article "List of weather records" you can find "Coldest summer (month of July in the Northern Hemisphere): −33 °C (−27.4 °F) degrees; Summit Camp, Greenland on 4 July 2017.", do you know that climate on this planet have changed many times before hummans showed up? There was period of over 100 milion of years when earth was a big snow ball but somehow "climate deniers" are wrong because you should not use your brain and using knowledge from school is a sin that should be punished with mandatory tin foil hat on your head!
Yeah I'm guessing she's in it for the money since I suspect she's smart enough to see though political science that wouldn't recognize the the scientific method if it slapped them in the face. There are things we can and have done that could harm the planet, or at least the life on it, like Freon emissions that started to eat away the Ozon-layer, but CO2, isn't that big a contributor to the greenhouse effect in the first place, all it does is make plants happier, not really the environmental hazard some would make it. And yes temperature has changed a lot, there's a reason old Egyptian cities are in the now barren dessert, it wasn't barren back then, since it was so much warmer back then Sahara had monsune rains. (And here in Sweden at the time we had nowadays Mediterranean fauna in the middle of Sweden). (Bronze age). People often bring up the melting glaciers, yes they have been melting since the last ice-age peaked about 20000 years ago, what should worry is if they stop melting.
Biały yeah we definitely didn't impact the earth at all. So we should just forget about space exploration because we didn't contribute to global warming at all. We should just suffer the natural effects because we didn't cause them. Good point.
NemeanLion i think global warming is rubbish. Over here in England a frost is on the cards. In frickin May! As for Noah’s Ark, I wouldn’t know one way or another. I wasn’t around in the time of Genesis 6:14 so it could very well be real.
MrSupercar55 Omg, please tell me you’re joking. 🤦♂️A cold spell in warm weather is a symptom of global warming. The weather goes through extremes. It’s not just about hot weather. Do yourself a favor and don’t tell this to anyone, otherwise you’ll sound ridiculous like Donald Trump. Keep away from talking about science.
@@NemeanLion- In other words, everything is a sign of global warming? Warm spells and dry summers? Global Warming.. Cold summers and lush rains? Global Warming.. Cooling and droughts? Golbal warming... Numbers of Ice bears increasing? Sea Ice increasing? Sea level rise constant? No increase in "Extreme weather events" what so bloody ever? Must be global warming.... Sure, why not, and let's not forget the doomsday prophets coming along every ten to fifteen years, like clockwork, promising how we only have ten more years.....
Alexander Kale It’s scary to think there are people like you out there that so vehemently deny science in favor of gut hunches. “Global warming” isn’t necessarily a warming of the globe. Global warming is an extreme of all weather patterns. You don’t know any of this because you’re not a scientist. And neither am I. I trust professionals because they’re educated on the subject. It’s also the same reason you let trained doctors do surgery on you instead of witch doctors. All climatologists do is study weather patterns and factors that affect weather, from the dawn of time. They use the SCIENTIFIC METHOD of observation.....no guess work, no gut hunches from the peanut gallery. They show their observations to the public, but the knuckle dragging morons think they have a better grasp with their extensive experience on the subject. Please.
@@MrSupercar55 From one observation, in one part of the world, during one particular season, you assume that you can extrapolate what's been happening all over the world over a period of centuries??? Did you even pass high school science?
Agreed, the sarcasm was very strong. After I got over that I had to hand it to her: Sarcasm is the mark of an intellectual conversation. If you're not successfully interpreting nuances on multiple levels, you're either not paying attention, or sadly unaware.
not really, and due to her american accent she poses every sentence like a question so sarcasm is lost within the nauseating sound of her speaking method
No it's not the accent because I'm american, It was the valley girl, cunny speak, talk loud so you sound smart, nauseating sound of her speaking method, like oh my God, fer sure.
+Edward Gorey "Sarcasm is the mark of an intellectual conversation." No. Not really. I use sarcasm a lot of the time, but I don't have to. Sarcasm or no sarcasm has nothing whatsoever to do with the intelligence of one's argument. Only the content of one's argument determines the level of intellectualism.
I must agree. Especially when I heard about Global Warming influenced by humans from her - she is just from this side of political spectra which is sure (like others believe in God) what Global Warming caused by humans. But it's not proven scientifically, so I don't really oblige to believe in it (and nobody can force me to believe in God either by the way). Nor Freeman Dyson either.
I feel we need to explore space with corn. The closest option is Proxima B. By accelerating grains of corn to very near the speed of light, one kernel may just make it. Even if it collides with a grain of sand during the interminable straight line to there, it may still germinate. Our future is in corn.
I didnt find her sarcastic approach condescending bc i understood her point. Most of you still watched even if you found her voice annoying, her looks flattering or her sarcasm confusing. She succeeded.
@Becky uh, this video have, at this moment, 8K likes and 3K dislikes which is a pretty bad proportion imo. If I was her I would abstain myself from doing a speech like that in the future.
She's a real gem this one. The dilemma of choosing one thing over the other is a tempting but ultimately flawed dilemma. It's like saying *"I want to be a doctor but I also want to do painting. I can't possibly do them both."* What's wrong with pursuing both endeavors? You can't enjoy a career and a hobby at the same time? My grandfather was both an architect and an artist. He worked for some of the largest corporations but when he went home he made sculptures.
Humanity can easily do away with the 250 billion $ fashion industry. We don't need to like up the pockets of the celebs, and shareholders for useless handbags and sunglasses.
I have totallity agree with this waste of money on space exploration and have since the 1960's. This money could be better used on solving urgent existant problems.
I am no scientist or a part of anything near space exploration nor do i have an education any way near the subjekt. But for me just knowing, that there are people out there exploring those fronters, keeps my faith in humanity and helps me get up in the morning. I believe i we do not keep pushing the fronters, we will turn stagnant.
Not stagnant - extinct. Mankind is on a deathclock. Our days on Earth are numbered, we've crossed the Ecological Catastrophe Thresholds and there currently isn't a method how to clean the greenhouse gases fast enough and significantly enough to reverse the "Venus" scenario. Sure, we can hope that biotechnology will eventually give us some "CO2 eating floating thing" that we could disperse in the atmosphere and let it consume all the CO2, but that's a fool's hope. We've f**ked it up.
We should have forests planted on the outskirts of big cites.. Maybe even in a ring.. .or future planners can design a layout with parts of wooded and urban areas.. try to equal itself out
English is not my native language and I think I have a mid - low level of understanding, expecially for spoken language. I had no doubt it was ironic and sarcastic. I am scared when I see so many people, native english, thinking che is REALLY SAYING space exploration in bad.
Space exploration is key to spreading around the Galaxy, if we don’t and we are stuck on earth and a catastrophic event happens and we get wiped out I’ll be sure to let all these people that think it’s a waste of time know that is was their fault, wow she has a degree!! Doesn’t mean she is truly intelligent though if she agrees that it’s a bad idea,. god even a little kid would know it has to happen for humankind to survive EDIT - me stoopid
Imagine thinking that a woman who spent many years studying space at MIT would actually hate space exploration and being surprised when finding out that the title's meant to be tongue-and-cheek and not meant to be taken literally.
It's a waste of money, instead of knowing how the Earth is changing, why don't we use those billions of dollars to find out more about our planet and it's oceans?
Great job Emily! Not surprised by some of the comments, sarcasm was a bold choice but I think it's a valuable and unique addition to the eternal space exploration debate. For every person that didn't get the humor, there is another person that just heard the benefits of space exploration in a way that finally makes sense to them.
Great talk, congratulations. Space exploration is NOT a waste of money and is indeed a very important issue for the future of all humankind, because it really has very positive benefits in our daily life (by stimulating the development of many tecnologies that improve our well-being) and hones our understanding of the universe and can save our species from extinction providing us new places to stettle in the future in case our planet becames uninhabitable or can no longer sustain us. Space exploration is very important and that`s why society and governments should invest a lot more in it.
I can't believe people actually think that most of the downvotes are because people stopped watching before the end. You'd have to be 8 to not spot the obvious sarcasm about a minute into the talk. Doesn't change the fact that the presentation was just annoying. There's about 2 minutes of pretty obvious and well known content, stretched into 13+ minutes of poorly executed sarcasm. Most of us expect TED (or TEDx) videos to have much more original content that's thought provoking, and not be just a gimmick, like the type used on personal UA-cam channels to try and get views.
What about it? You like not having to worry about a military invasion, right? That's why we have a military. The strongest in the world, which means we already discourage anyone from trying to invade the USA without firing a single shot.
Actually most of the military budge gets spent on personnel. Remember, we don't have a draft anymore so if you don't offer a decent wage people won't join the military. If you don't want to serve then you want us in the military to make ok money. If you want us to get paid pennies, then get ready for a new draft.
I watched 4 minutes and stoped because she omited all the data from NASA that is telling different story, she is talking about 2013 but for some reason dont know that in 2014 Antarctic sea ice extent exceeded any data from period when satelites started to monitor ice levels(1970)... And what about all Ice Ages? Why people like her have PHD in science and in the same time completely lack knowledge that is not a secret for 10 years old kids... You can find proper scientists that are not ready to sell PHD for money or for fame in TV and will show you unbiased data that is telling completly different story!
For god's sake. I wrote an entire paragraph on everything I thought was wrong about her speech as I listened. Then she pulled that sick plot twist at the end and now everything I wrote down was invalid. That was pretty cool tho.
@@ossiehalvorson7702 Ok i will search about that... but combustion is not the only source of gghs. materials transport etc. do they compensate their emissions? i guess they don't considering they have climate deniers in charge. scientists can say everything about climate change but nothing will change until collapse of civilization will occur. now they want to go on mars... i have no words
She didn't talk about space exploration. Weather satellites pointed at the Earth, communication satellites to expand the internet and colonizing other worlds are all about space utilization. Exploration wasn't mentioned at all. But if the clickbait title draws people in, and the nearly amusing sarcasm keeps them around, then it's all good...
I think space exploration is always underbudget. I 've heard American spend twice amount of money just on beer. (Beer is good sometimes I but I hope you understand Exploring our planet throught space exploration program seems more useful
They have had advanced technology called electromagnetic propulsion systems antigravity wave riders that repel gravity at a blink of an eye lightning speed
I have been privilege to see this technology on more that 4 acations our governments are take your more from right under your noses and they have no chance of sharing this technology the globalist elites what so ever mark
This talk was terrible. Her sarcasm and smugness made understanding her actual opinion extremely difficult. As a speaker your job is to make your point clear and easily understandable.
I know this is sarcasm, but I still want to say in my opinion that space exploration is essential for human survival as earth won’t always be here plus exploring new planets and galaxy’s will lead to new technologies and better understanding over our universe and will bring about a new era for humans, but yeah sorry for my rant, that’s just what I believe
What's the worst is that media will not tell you the North Pole is getting warmer while at the same time South Pole has been getting much colder. ships often getting stuck in the ice. You won't hear that in the media. And the obvious part that warmer clients make human beings thrive and colder climate makes people die.
Thank goodness for the comment section. I honestly was so confused at first and it stopped listening and went to the comment section to see what was going on here Glad that I did.
I find it interesting that her speech was supposed to be about space exploration, but most of the points she made had nothing to do with space exploration. For example, satellites monitoring the earth is not space exploration.
1:05 1 why does that matter that it needs to be said specifically?! 2 are those little girls expected to protect and provide for future husband and kid(s) no matter what?!
Great speech; in that you presented some of the most important facts for space exploration in such a short period of time; this in a way ironic because if we don't pay attention to what is happening here on earth our time will be short on the timeline of our planet. Thanks for spreading the message a positive message on how to help us and our earth through space exploration and education.
I agree that sarcasm is more convincing than data, especially when the data speaks for itself. Science deniers, especially on denial outlets like Fox, et al, use sarcasm all the time. I think this stone cold fox completely out-sarcasmed them.
I heard the word "Fox" and it upped the amount of time it took me to realise she was joking...5.7K dislikes is the current count...proof that we are 30% morons.
I agree with the message, but sarcasm has a half life, and also has to have a punctuation when the point becomes serious. This is 100% sarcasm, and therefore unrelatable. Sarcasm needs breaks.
It was a good talk. I am glad however, that I was able to read the comments underneath before watching the whole of it. I simply used 'fast forward' to get to her (excellent) conclusion. I would like therefore, to pass on my thanks to all of you pioneers who watched it first and commented. Keep up the good work !
she takes too long to get to the point. I get that she is being sarcastic, and has to make it clear, without saying it, but a little faster, less redundancies.
This is like telling a long story to get to the punchline. It's like; okay i get it. Space exploration is like saying lets start over on this newly discovered land over here. It's definitely not meant to help everyone.
Ahhhh!!! Reading this comment section makes me so frustrated because a lot of people missed the point... The reason for the heavy sarcasm was to point out the flaws in the opposing argument while at the same time supporting her own. She kept with the sarcasm to draw in an audience that would actually pay attention to what she was saying. It drew in people that agreed with the title or people that were willing to hear her entire argument. The heavy sarcasm exists in this speech to take the opposing arguments and point out their flaws, not to be cool or annoying. -_-;
The genre of this video is Hard Sarcasm. I like it, but I wouldn't share it because too many of my friends would get confused and go into existential crisis.
Absolutely
😂
Who on earth are you hanging out with?
This is so true. Lol.
That's not at all sarcastic
Never overestimate the intelligence of your viewers...
Ain't that the truth. It won't hit her until the day she hears her own words being used against her in a debate (But I was being sarcastic!). Or when some big Creationism/Climate Change Denier Convention asks her to be their Keynote Speaker.
At the very end she does literally say space travel isn't the worst.
Just to make sure.
Of course not but the context is misleading, claiming the opposite of the conclusion, which is obvious and her show therefore sarcasm, boring and waste of time.
If you want to be sarcastic thats ok. People have too know where you are coming from first. If not, they woulnt get the sarcasm.
she also overestimated the patience of her viewers, obviously~
This isnt complaining about space exploration, its complaining about climate change and the government's lack of action towards it
cant do anything about climate change,its governed by the sun,you want to stop it,stop the sun,just wait till that solar flare hits,then,you got something to complain about..!!.we cant go to the moon,its inhabited,,so is mars..work it out..who cleans the rover,.it should of stopped yrs ago..
@Anant Tiwari Dude calm tf down. I'm pretty sure @Harry Walker was just being sarcastic
@Koala Dances well but in a million years even if there no humans you will see the difference, Sun will become bigger and bigger and temperatures will rise slowly but surely.
@@alchemist6819 yes, climate change is natural. But at this speed? The issue is that we are speeding up this process.
@in nxj Actually you’re wrong. CFCs caused a hole in the ozone layer and we stopped using them in the hole is going away.
Humans have caused problems on earth and we have fixed a lot of them. But climate change has at least a dozen variables and scientist are clueless about each of them individually and even more clueless when it comes to their interaction together.
The two things people use to prove man-made climate change is the hockey stick graph and models. Michael Mann manipulated the data when he created a hockey stick graph and that has been debunked and proven. The hockey stick graph is completely bogus. And for nearly 50 years to computer models using manipulated algorithms and manipulated data still can’t close to getting anything even remotely accurate.
Man harm the environment? Absolutely. His man contributing to, change? Maybe. To some degree probably. But man is not causing climate change. And there is no, absolutely zero, proof or evidence to say otherwise. If it was people would believe it. If there was proof scientist would not manipulate the data and lie about it. That’s not what you do with the evidence is on your side.
I suggest you read Bjorn Lomborg, Robert Bryce, Michael Shellenberger, and Judith Curry.
I like the approach, but it's strenuous watching an entire talk based on sarcasm.
Yep, the transition away from sarcasm should have happened about 90 seconds into the talk, not 30 seconds before the end.
Sarcasm turned me off. Didn't last a minute. Poor audience!
(1) ignore space exploration (2) spend more money on poor people (3) let the planet die (4) nobody will ever be poor again!
You just need to watch without listening...
Imagine what it had to be for her to build an entire talk on sarcasm. I have a lot of respect for her for doing that.
As soon as she says she has a degree from MIT Aeronautics and Astronautics you know it can only be sarcasm ...
"Thar' she blows!"
But then she calls near earth orbit outer space in the next sentence, so you get an explanation for why she got a job at FOX instead.
Notice the word "Nautics". That's because everything they do at NASA is under water... And they just produce fake videos and take your money. Pretty obvious when you look into it and stop accepting everything you hear at face value.
So you are being Sheldon saying MIT is just a ridiculous trade school.
@@detech8149 is that what I said?
9:30
Well, it's 2020 and OneWeb is bankrupt.
But SpaceX is doing pretty well with nearly five hundred Starlink satelites.
One web: reverse card
Brought by bharti airtel, it will be put on track
yes. and now, Elon Musk is the richest person on earth working on sending 12,000 satellites in space and neuralink
@@taqitahmid4894 Musk is an arms supplier building missiles for our government under the guise of space exploration.
@@mizzoupatriot8814 really!! what are you gonna do with those missiles? invade the earth? 😅
That one clap at the mention of Matt Damon
The most awkward clap ever 😅
jimmy kimmel in the audience
I think I've seen Matt there, in the corner
impossible. Matt is missing most of the time
Matt who?
Troll Level: Goddess
Ha 😃😃
Troll level: literally lives under a bridge
u didnt watch the vid havnt u
venus is the true temptress of the garden
I needed quite some time to point out the sarcasm xD
She can be a successful super lady villain in hollywood sci-fi movies.
Haha 🤣🤣lol
Yup
True. She’s hot
She may be the next Halo Antagonist.
@@charlesg7926 BRUH!
WATCH THE VIDEO SHE LIKES SPACE ITS OK.
tony sayenko she's having a discussion of what other people think that the funding is more than a billion which could be used on Earth but she's hot
you saved me 14 mins
Tony Sayenko It's not okay when space exploration is a total fraud. She even believes in the BS scam of man made climate change.
@@freethesky10blue89 hahahahahahahahahahahaha again! say what you said again!! what a hoot! ever consider stand up?
@@DarthVader20201 right, im like, "im still not convinced, can I stay after class?"
Oh man, for a second there I thought she was actually saying that Space Exploration is the Worst, but she was being sarcastic the whole time.
100+ for "being sarcastic".. lol
+Mason Lance I also didn't pick up on the satire until the climate change part :'D
+Connor Goosen I mean I lost it at "Justin Beiber has his own problems" bet Yeah.
+Mason Lance for a second you say? I took me more than ten minutes to find that out, I have nearly thrown the biggest disliking hatful comment Internet has ever seen while I was boiling inside. At last minutes she turned fantastic! My apologies, Emily Calandrelli, sorry for thinking that you are the worst troubling creature crawling on Earth for whole long ten munutes. uuuuuh!
hahahaha.. it took me 3 min.
At 9 minutes her incredibly intelligent humour is so over-the-top that people miss it she's so smart that people miss it. Nothing but bell curves of understanding
It's blatantly obvious sarcasm. I don't think anybody missed it lol
@@baelish1058 my sweet summer child
@@JackMott ???????????
She so wrong
This woman had me so triggered at the beginning. What a genius!
me too!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I deleted my first comment until I listened to far too much of her drama.. Yes I actually did agree with her in the end LOL !!
The title, alone, is enough to trigger... ^^
yeh like literally we can't watch her porm videos without satellites
hope you right i was about to exit out till i read you so ill stick it out.
Spoiler alert: she is for the space exploration, but you should listen till the end anyway.
OF COURSE shes not happy with man made global warming being DEBUNKED...AN MIT CRADUATE IN AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS....it PAYS for her to make sure we keep waisting time trying to change what the word of God says about creation...Humans can't control the universe GOD DOES...get over it "intellectuals"....the sun is causing the heating and cooling of the earth and causing the heating/cooling cycles ...Real independent scientists know this...mankind thinks far too much of ourself... OUR PART PLAYED IN CLIMATE CHANGE IS NEGLIGABLE...compared to the co2 that the earth and its natural proccess/animals emit!
DONT BUY INTO THE LIE...DONT BELIEVE EVERTHING YOU HERE FROM MAINSTREAM "SCIENCE"... MOST HAVE PRIVATE/PERSONAL INTERESTS MIXED IN WITH SOME GOOD OLD FASHION SELF RIGHTEOUS SURFACE HEROICS...
IN OTHER BETTER NEWS...YOU CAN REPENT OF YOUR SIN, TRUST THE GOD WHO DESIGNED AND MADE IT ALL AND BE SET FREE FROM LIES...LIVE IN TRUE REALITY.
TRUST IN THE LORD JESUS TODAY BECSUSE TOMORROW ISNT PROMISED...SAD THING IS NUCLEAR WAR MIGHT BE THE ONLY THING THAT STOPS YOU LOOKING AT THE STARS AND FORCES YOU TO BOW THE KNEE TO THE STARMAKER.
JESUS IS THE WAY, TRUTH AND LIFE AND NO SPACESHUTTLE CAN TAKE YOU TO HIM. REPENTANCE AND FAITH IN HIM IS THE ONLY HOPE FOR ALL MANKIND
@@YetNotI7 - your ignorance will make us all morons.
@@jerbiebarb naaa, we might not reproduce as much as just a man but thats more cabin room for our great grandchildren lol. i hope our great grandchildren leave people like him behind. its a win win, they can be happy dying in denial, and the future of humanity will be sans the uneducated who think they know it all.
Jamal - it hasn't happened yet. The indoctrination methods are becoming more effective with all the religion allowed on UA-cam.
@Nidhogg Man... I came to this comment section to see what people thought, and a large amount of them missed the entire point of the video. You included -_-
In my humble opnion, we human beings are explorers by nature, we try to understand and get answers of everything that surrounds us, if we thought that way, we hadn't created airplanes, ships and so on to help us explore new places
2 min silence for those who left in between
No, ten minute silence
lol witty and true comment!
this talk had a Poe's Law issue....Poe's Law: "without a clear indicator of the author's intent, parodies of extreme views will be mistaken by some readers or viewers for sincere expressions of the parodied views."
she, obviously, was clear about her sarcasm but not until a certain point (which was the point, obviously).
+KandaPanda The first half of her presentation was extremely confusing. That sarcasm was way too thick.
I didn't find that, but I guess I've a high tolerance for sarcasm. Probably because I'm British.
maybe it's because I'm Australian (we are a very sarcastic bunch), but I picked up on it immediately
There will always be a few thickheaded nutcases out there who never get the point.
If you didn't pick up on her being sarcastic after the first 3 minutes, you need to have your sarcasm detector checked.
Poe's law shmoe's law. Learn to listen to people!
She took special classes at MIT in "How to come up with clickbait titles"
TheSaltyJ she made up a “clickbait” title 4 years ago - doing a ted talk?
No she did that in Fox
she click bait herself.. what a hottie for the Nasa world! Take her to Mars!
You are probably right , but she has a real point
We need sidewalks everywhere ooohhhh we care about our disabled. Quit wasting tax dollars.
I have been so profoundly stunned by the amount of stupidity and ignorance among the world's population that she honestly nearly had me at the start there.
I think you missed the sarcasm and did no watch the entire video.. "Space exploration is the worst" was a joke
@@bertski7950 Did you not understand my comment or is this a joke that went over my head?
I'm sure everyone at first was like "This girl doesn't know what she's talking about", only the educated ones thought "Just hear her opinions, then make a judgement", to then realize, it actually is all sarcasm
I did suspect sarcasm after hearing what she studied. ;)
nope the sarcasm was shining through ;)
Y I think people clicked and disliked. Thought shes tard shitalking too before watching
Jesus christ she pushes the wage gap myth too, so yeah, she's not the brightest tool in the shed after all.
never pat yourself on the back for being among "the educated ones".
Unbelievable, 14 minutes of sarcasm.
Ironic as she talks about wasting time..
@@proudt-klouds608 lol 😂
😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣💀💀💀💀💀
wonder how many of those dislikes are from people who dont understand sarcasm and didn't finnish the video...?
Imaginative Crimminal I disliked it because it was annoying, overdone.
Imaginative Crimminal, I disliked it because she's perpetuating an ongoing myth about Elon Musk.
@nightwishnemo Practically everything he represents!!
Correction, American sarcasm.
She has no content. That's why she took up the art of spoiling a very good topic
She is indeed intelligent but that way of communicating her ideas gave me cancer.
I thought you were being silly, but my doctor told me this video gave me stage 2 brain cancer. Apparently the sarcasm was so heavy that my cells mutated. This lady needs to be more careful with her sarcasm, next time someone that cares about dying may be affected.
Agree to both of you. I CANNOT stand her perky voice combined with sarcasm.
And, in general, I LOVE sarcasm.
Americans shouldn't try sarcasm... it is inherently British! Sorry.
lol.
Sarcasm is dangerous!
Because people who lead the free modern world (Donald Fart) just can't understand the real message!
I admire her courage to use irony to the max but the title was misleading
How was it misleading? It's all she talked about for the 13 minutes.
@@klif4755 Mark Rover does not exist.
@@lukaskrampitz3470 if you think that‘s her actual point then you weren’t the intelligent audience she was targeting
It's called sarcasm...
And confusing till the end
I've never liked a video after disliking it so fast 😂😂
@@foobarmaximus3506 You know she was sarcastic the entire video, right?
At the end she actually says why space exploration is important.
Never judge a book by its over.
@@theboringprogrammer4444 Yeah, even in the description, they put it as if she is against space exploration. Its so misleading.
me too---well done by her and i thank the comment section for straightening me out---and what i with this one guy who still does not like it?
Am i the only one who actually believed that she was been serious for a few minutes?
Nope
Nope
I almost jumped up the video in the beging.
I downvoted and was about to close the tab. Decided to read several comments and figured out she is not serious.
Knowing people holding opposite views to "big/high tech", "space exploration", and "global warming" will never open a video/article with these key words in it, she is exploring a new way. By presenting evidence/facts to "support" her opinion of the title, she finds a way to force people with opposite views to accept the facts. Sometimes when we accept a opinion blindly just because one authority said so, we don't go deep to search for evidence. By trying hard watching her video to find reason why space exploration is bad, viewer ends up knowing more facts of what's going on. This is pretty brilliant!
DO PEOPLE COMMENTING NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT SARCASM IS!!!! LOOK AT 13:30, SHE IS ALL FOR SPACE EXPLORATION
She should have probably made this more clear a little early on
OK, it became quite obvious quite soon after posting this
Too bad she lost me in the early minutes with her talk on little girls and her pink email. In my opinion, her presentation is just as her, misleading.
Yeah, she actually improved in her presentation a few minutes in, I'm not sure if it was nerves or just planning but it was defiantly worth the watch after the first few minutes.
Finally someone got it! Sexy, smart an sarcastic chick selling you NASA right there :D Luv the brainwashing professionality though.
at first i thought she was serious and i was soo close to disliking
Vriska Serket I disliked. Space is boring.
mrfld well why don't you delete your selfies as well since you don't like it so much
I have no selfies. Also boring.
mrfld you know what else is boring? School and education. We should get rid of that immediately.
I'd be fine with that. If you are smart enough to pass the GED you shouldn't waste 4 year of your life in high school.
I gotta give it to her, she has this special thing (besides her look) switching between the right information and beeing the cute girl. I bet she could run the world with her knowledge and charisma.
I was really trolled by her first few minutes before I figured out she was being facetious, haha. Great talk!
lmao look at all the thumbs down. She's really triggering the climate deniers
She pointing how hot was 2013 and is somehow completly unaware that "On Sept. 19, 2014, the five-day average of Antarctic sea ice extent exceeded 20 million square kilometers for the first time since 1979 (...) Sea ice surrounding Antarctica reached a new record high extent this year, covering more of the southern oceans than it has since scientists began a long-term satellite record to map sea ice extent in the late 1970s." you can easly find this data on official NASA web page... but hey they have explanation there why its normal as well as here she have why there can be more snow... and how satelite can prove that hummans have anything to do with climate change? How there is no proper scientific model to predict weather nex year, month or even next week but somehow people like her trying to convince you that she have PHD so she knows what she is talking about... on wikipedia article "List of weather records" you can find "Coldest summer (month of July in the Northern Hemisphere): −33 °C (−27.4 °F) degrees; Summit Camp, Greenland on 4 July 2017.", do you know that climate on this planet have changed many times before hummans showed up? There was period of over 100 milion of years when earth was a big snow ball but somehow "climate deniers" are wrong because you should not use your brain and using knowledge from school is a sin that should be punished with mandatory tin foil hat on your head!
I must have a more acute irony detector than the average bear. And for an MIT grad, this seemed a rather childish presentation.
Yeah I'm guessing she's in it for the money since I suspect she's smart enough to see though political science that wouldn't recognize the the scientific method if it slapped them in the face. There are things we can and have done that could harm the planet, or at least the life on it, like Freon emissions that started to eat away the Ozon-layer, but CO2, isn't that big a contributor to the greenhouse effect in the first place, all it does is make plants happier, not really the environmental hazard some would make it. And yes temperature has changed a lot, there's a reason old Egyptian cities are in the now barren dessert, it wasn't barren back then, since it was so much warmer back then Sahara had monsune rains. (And here in Sweden at the time we had nowadays Mediterranean fauna in the middle of Sweden). (Bronze age). People often bring up the melting glaciers, yes they have been melting since the last ice-age peaked about 20000 years ago, what should worry is if they stop melting.
Biały yeah we definitely didn't impact the earth at all. So we should just forget about space exploration because we didn't contribute to global warming at all. We should just suffer the natural effects because we didn't cause them. Good point.
"A manned space rocket is a controlled bomb built by the lowest bidder!" :-)
Where have I read this before....
The same people that believe Noah’s Ark was an actual event, think global warming is a fairy tale.
NemeanLion i think global warming is rubbish. Over here in England a frost is on the cards. In frickin May! As for Noah’s Ark, I wouldn’t know one way or another. I wasn’t around in the time of Genesis 6:14 so it could very well be real.
MrSupercar55 Omg, please tell me you’re joking. 🤦♂️A cold spell in warm weather is a symptom of global warming. The weather goes through extremes. It’s not just about hot weather. Do yourself a favor and don’t tell this to anyone, otherwise you’ll sound ridiculous like Donald Trump. Keep away from talking about science.
@@NemeanLion- In other words, everything is a sign of global warming?
Warm spells and dry summers? Global Warming..
Cold summers and lush rains? Global Warming..
Cooling and droughts? Golbal warming...
Numbers of Ice bears increasing? Sea Ice increasing? Sea level rise constant? No increase in "Extreme weather events" what so bloody ever? Must be global warming....
Sure, why not, and let's not forget the doomsday prophets coming along every ten to fifteen years, like clockwork, promising how we only have ten more years.....
Alexander Kale It’s scary to think there are people like you out there that so vehemently deny science in favor of gut hunches. “Global warming” isn’t necessarily a warming of the globe. Global warming is an extreme of all weather patterns. You don’t know any of this because you’re not a scientist. And neither am I. I trust professionals because they’re educated on the subject. It’s also the same reason you let trained doctors do surgery on you instead of witch doctors. All climatologists do is study weather patterns and factors that affect weather, from the dawn of time. They use the SCIENTIFIC METHOD of observation.....no guess work, no gut hunches from the peanut gallery. They show their observations to the public, but the knuckle dragging morons think they have a better grasp with their extensive experience on the subject. Please.
@@MrSupercar55 From one observation, in one part of the world, during one particular season, you assume that you can extrapolate what's been happening all over the world over a period of centuries??? Did you even pass high school science?
Agreed, the sarcasm was very strong. After I got over that I had to hand it to her: Sarcasm is the mark of an intellectual conversation. If you're not successfully interpreting nuances on multiple levels, you're either not paying attention, or sadly unaware.
not really, and due to her american accent she poses every sentence like a question so sarcasm is lost within the nauseating sound of her speaking method
No it's not the accent because I'm american, It was the valley girl, cunny speak, talk loud so you sound smart, nauseating sound of her speaking method, like oh my God, fer sure.
+Edward Gorey "Sarcasm is the mark of an intellectual conversation."
No. Not really. I use sarcasm a lot of the time, but I don't have to. Sarcasm or no sarcasm has nothing whatsoever to do with the intelligence of one's argument. Only the content of one's argument determines the level of intellectualism.
Ed was being sarcastic there... lol.
I must agree. Especially when I heard about Global Warming influenced by humans from her - she is just from this side of political spectra which is sure (like others believe in God) what Global Warming caused by humans. But it's not proven scientifically, so I don't really oblige to believe in it (and nobody can force me to believe in God either by the way). Nor Freeman Dyson either.
This girl is awesome. This level of sarcasm is a beautiful thing to see
I feel we need to explore space with corn.
The closest option is Proxima B.
By accelerating grains of corn to very near the speed of light, one kernel may just make it.
Even if it collides with a grain of sand during the interminable straight line to there, it may still germinate.
Our future is in corn.
lmao
Make it happen
Lmao
Lol
I didnt find her sarcastic approach condescending bc i understood her point.
Most of you still watched even if you found her voice annoying, her looks flattering or her sarcasm confusing. She succeeded.
yeah I only finished because of the comments not her speech so fail
Bernando F Torres
If she's hot I'm Sylvester Stallone.
No she did not. She only wast my time ...
I listened to about 3/4s of it then I had to stop. It was way too annoying.
@Becky uh, this video have, at this moment, 8K likes and 3K dislikes which is a pretty bad proportion imo. If I was her I would abstain myself from doing a speech like that in the future.
Spoiler Alert:
She likes space exploration
Getting into LEO isn't the same as space exploration. We are basically scooting along the edge of the atmosphere.
Some Satellites are higher and artemis programm on moon
She's a real gem this one. The dilemma of choosing one thing over the other is a tempting but ultimately flawed dilemma.
It's like saying *"I want to be a doctor but I also want to do painting. I can't possibly do them both."*
What's wrong with pursuing both endeavors? You can't enjoy a career and a hobby at the same time?
My grandfather was both an architect and an artist. He worked for some of the largest corporations but when he went home he made sculptures.
Humanity can easily do away with the 250 billion $ fashion industry. We don't need to like up the pockets of the celebs, and shareholders for useless handbags and sunglasses.
Too much sarcasm
Kilju Pullo
Given the proliferation of NASA bashers, that sarcasm is speaks to them.
Nah, you just seem really fun.
C'mon, it's only 1 minute in the end.
yeh like literally we can't watch her porm videos without satellites
It's not sarcasm but cynicism.
This was on my feed on april fools day
The amount of dislikes shows that a lot of people didn’t understand this which sucks. This was brilliant WOW
Being totally wrong is brilliant?
Awesome theory based on "thinking" like a caveman.
@@tommcwilliams1072 I guess some of us read between the lines more than the average. It was just pretty obvious so it was good to me
@@shahrozahmad475 And by "obvious" you mean you can't actually provide a counterargument, ergo are bullshitting?
Got it.
@@tommcwilliams1072 well I’m entitled to my opinion without needing to explain myself. Take care
the sarcasme is strong in this one.
+Azraël Good.
I have totallity agree with this waste of money on space exploration and have since the 1960's. This money could be better used on solving urgent existant problems.
I am no scientist or a part of anything near space exploration nor do i have an education any way near the subjekt.
But for me just knowing, that there are people out there exploring those fronters, keeps my faith in humanity and helps me get up in the morning.
I believe i we do not keep pushing the fronters, we will turn stagnant.
Not stagnant - extinct. Mankind is on a deathclock. Our days on Earth are numbered, we've crossed the Ecological Catastrophe Thresholds and there currently isn't a method how to clean the greenhouse gases fast enough and significantly enough to reverse the "Venus" scenario.
Sure, we can hope that biotechnology will eventually give us some "CO2 eating floating thing" that we could disperse in the atmosphere and let it consume all the CO2, but that's a fool's hope.
We've f**ked it up.
Cp vJ She is being sarcastic
We should have forests planted on the outskirts of big cites.. Maybe even in a ring.. .or future planners can design a layout with parts of wooded and urban areas.. try to equal itself out
English is not my native language and I think I have a mid - low level of understanding, expecially for spoken language.
I had no doubt it was ironic and sarcastic. I am scared when I see so many people, native english, thinking che is REALLY SAYING space exploration in bad.
youre scared?!? we have to live with these people!
Space exploration is key to spreading around the Galaxy, if we don’t and we are stuck on earth and a catastrophic event happens and we get wiped out I’ll be sure to let all these people that think it’s a waste of time know that is was their fault, wow she has a degree!! Doesn’t mean she is truly intelligent though if she agrees that it’s a bad idea,. god even a little kid would know it has to happen for humankind to survive EDIT - me stoopid
I want to go to Mars. I hear land is cheap there.
and radiation shielding
Getting there and freight for all your stuff in the move, not so cheap.
Itd be easier to just move to antarctica...
/\'Cypheir dummy Antarctica is apart of earth
No human(or dog) has been on moon,never mind Mars.Wake up
Love it when a woman is able to use sarcasm to such extent and has a boatload of intelligence to do so. Cheers, lady, made my day with the vid.
Imagine thinking that a woman who spent many years studying space at MIT would actually hate space exploration and being surprised when finding out that the title's meant to be tongue-and-cheek and not meant to be taken literally.
I came into this ready to hate, but reading the comments is giving me hope
Hot and Smart...it's the worst
Lol good one
I just turned the volume off a watch for a while !
@@adrianxenia5670 did ya have a good rub?
@@jamalalqassem8747 me
I agree with one of those comments
It's a waste of money, instead of knowing how the Earth is changing, why don't we use those billions of dollars to find out more about our planet and it's oceans?
We could explore space to discover something to help us save the earth
She was very refreshing to listen to. She backed up all her points with data.
I was really infuriated by the title but thanks for the little patience I throughly enjoyed this TEDx episode. Thank you.
I see, sarcasm. Hopefully most viewers went through the whole video.
Great job Emily! Not surprised by some of the comments, sarcasm was a bold choice but I think it's a valuable and unique addition to the eternal space exploration debate. For every person that didn't get the humor, there is another person that just heard the benefits of space exploration in a way that finally makes sense to them.
+Brad Kohlenberg lol this video is not going to translate into other languages well
haha agreed
Well, just watch UA-cam videos of NASA that are uploaded on their channel and you'll see maaany people with some intellectual problems.
Beauty, brains, and sarcasm.....the holy trinity that I seek!
Great talk, congratulations.
Space exploration is NOT a waste of money and is indeed a very important issue for the future of all humankind, because it really has very positive benefits in our daily life (by stimulating the development of many tecnologies that improve our well-being) and hones our understanding of the universe and can save our species from extinction providing us new places to stettle in the future in case our planet becames uninhabitable or can no longer sustain us.
Space exploration is very important and that`s why society and governments should invest a lot more in it.
I can't believe people actually think that most of the downvotes are because people stopped watching before the end. You'd have to be 8 to not spot the obvious sarcasm about a minute into the talk. Doesn't change the fact that the presentation was just annoying. There's about 2 minutes of pretty obvious and well known content, stretched into 13+ minutes of poorly executed sarcasm. Most of us expect TED (or TEDx) videos to have much more original content that's thought provoking, and not be just a gimmick, like the type used on personal UA-cam channels to try and get views.
What about the $600 Billion military budget??????????
What about it? You like not having to worry about a military invasion, right? That's why we have a military. The strongest in the world, which means we already discourage anyone from trying to invade the USA without firing a single shot.
vegarosa69 the us could do it with the half of this budget, but lockheed, Boeing and so on want their money
Actually most of the military budge gets spent on personnel. Remember, we don't have a draft anymore so if you don't offer a decent wage people won't join the military. If you don't want to serve then you want us in the military to make ok money. If you want us to get paid pennies, then get ready for a new draft.
It could also be due to the fast that our continent is the middle of the ocean? Away from about 80% of the world's population.
The US could be defended for less, perhaps $599 Billion.
The downvoters didn't watch the video past the first four minutes.
Believe it or not, but there are legitimate reasons to down vote for people who finished watching the video and fully understood the sarcasm.
I watched 4 minutes and stoped because she omited all the data from NASA that is telling different story, she is talking about 2013 but for some reason dont know that in 2014 Antarctic sea ice extent exceeded any data from period when satelites started to monitor ice levels(1970)... And what about all Ice Ages? Why people like her have PHD in science and in the same time completely lack knowledge that is not a secret for 10 years old kids... You can find proper scientists that are not ready to sell PHD for money or for fame in TV and will show you unbiased data that is telling completly different story!
For god's sake. I wrote an entire paragraph on everything I thought was wrong about her speech as I listened. Then she pulled that sick plot twist at the end and now everything I wrote down was invalid. That was pretty cool tho.
what about space agencies' carbon footprint? No mention about that
@@alessiodebonis2710 They burn hydrogen with an oxidizer, which is very near if not zero emission.
@@ossiehalvorson7702 Ok i will search about that... but combustion is not the only source of gghs. materials transport etc. do they compensate their emissions? i guess they don't considering they have climate deniers in charge. scientists can say everything about climate change but nothing will change until collapse of civilization will occur. now they want to go on mars... i have no words
I love space and our universe
You gotta think about it and not instantly rage quit, but eventually her sarcasm gets through and you see where she's going with it.
Play at 1.5x playback speed. ;)
You're welcome.
pshh. play at 2x speed. your welcome
She didn't talk about space exploration. Weather satellites pointed at the Earth, communication satellites to expand the internet and colonizing other worlds are all about space utilization. Exploration wasn't mentioned at all. But if the clickbait title draws people in, and the nearly amusing sarcasm keeps them around, then it's all good...
I think space exploration is always underbudget. I 've heard American spend twice amount of money just on beer. (Beer is good sometimes I but I hope you understand Exploring our planet throught space exploration program seems more useful
I have never drunk a beer in my life or any alcohol, ever. But, I am ALWAYS supportive of Americans drinking more beer if it makes them happy! :)
I heard that obesity cost USA more than the whole Apollo program.
*Each year.*
Not to mention military defense contractors manage to lobby congress so much that they get over 35 times as much as NASA.
They have had advanced technology called electromagnetic propulsion systems antigravity wave riders that repel gravity at a blink of an eye lightning speed
I have been privilege to see this technology on more that 4 acations our governments are take your more from right under your noses and they have no chance of sharing this technology the globalist elites what so ever mark
This talk was terrible. Her sarcasm and smugness made understanding her actual opinion extremely difficult. As a speaker your job is to make your point clear and easily understandable.
Ghastor no
The number of dislikes proves that sarcasm and derision never won our opponents' hearts and minds.
Glad I watched to the end
I know this is sarcasm, but I still want to say in my opinion that space exploration is essential for human survival as earth won’t always be here plus exploring new planets and galaxy’s will lead to new technologies and better understanding over our universe and will bring about a new era for humans, but yeah sorry for my rant, that’s just what I believe
What's the worst is that media will not tell you the North Pole is getting warmer while at the same time South Pole has been getting much colder. ships often getting stuck in the ice. You won't hear that in the media. And the obvious part that warmer clients make human beings thrive and colder climate makes people die.
I was kinda disappointed. I would like to hear someone with the TED talk level critisize space
That’s an insult to chimps
She was too smart for the lame audience.
no way
It is a big audience.
really? every lecture ive had in science classes no one laughs at any jokes the prof makes. it doesn't matter if your intelligent or not
If she was truly smart, she would have recognized that she was too smart for the audience and changed her approach.
I think the audience wasn't mic'd very well. Blast your speakers when she concludes the speech.
Thank goodness for the comment section. I honestly was so confused at first and it stopped listening and went to the comment section to see what was going on here Glad that I did.
I love when she mentions Matt Damon, and all you hear is one, single, solitary,...... clap.
Seriously, just go back and watch 3:57
Maat Daamon
Yeah, that was pretty funny.
she had me going for a minute.
Where u gone?
Lol💦👙?
I find it interesting that her speech was supposed to be about space exploration, but most of the points she made had nothing to do with space exploration. For example, satellites monitoring the earth is not space exploration.
People disliked this video without even watching it.
Smugness level OVER 9000!
I've seen way much worse, unfortunately (and sadly it was also from a briliant scientist woman).
And Frieza-Sama over 150 Million!
Your dumbness level over 10k.
this is contributing to global smugging. It's gona be Scisco all over again
I agree with the opinion being presented and cannot dispute the facts. I thoroughly enjoyed the talk. I still think she's absurdly smug.
1:05
1 why does that matter that it needs to be said specifically?!
2 are those little girls expected to protect and provide for future husband and kid(s) no matter what?!
please shut up😭
@@zinebalaoui8604 the words of someone that has no counter!
No lie the whole time i was like " she is kidding right is this a movie" but i respect her opinion
Sarcasm exists
Great speech; in that you presented some of the most important facts for space exploration in such a short period of time; this in a way ironic because if we don't pay attention to what is happening here on earth our time will be short on the timeline of our planet. Thanks for spreading the message a positive message on how to help us and our earth through space exploration and education.
I really loved how she uses sarcasm instead of data to make her point. Sarcasm and big knockers are much more convincing.
I agree that sarcasm is more convincing than data, especially when the data speaks for itself. Science deniers, especially on denial outlets like Fox, et al, use sarcasm all the time. I think this stone cold fox completely out-sarcasmed them.
this was one of the best presentation i have ever seen !
great job on this one
imagine whoever married her ..have to put up with her sarcasm for life!
I would truly love to
@@TheJono112 Trust me, you don't want to!
Seeing as how I'm sarcastic too. I think we would get along fine.
She is a treasure
I heard the word "Fox" and it upped the amount of time it took me to realise she was joking...5.7K dislikes is the current count...proof that we are 30% morons.
The internet could be a great learning tool..except no one uses it for that.
I agree with the message, but sarcasm has a half life, and also has to have a punctuation when the point becomes serious. This is 100% sarcasm, and therefore unrelatable. Sarcasm needs breaks.
its not 100% sarcasm, she let up ... but probly should have emphasized it more at the end.
It was a good talk. I am glad however, that I was able to read the comments underneath before watching the whole of it. I simply used 'fast forward' to get to her (excellent) conclusion.
I would like therefore, to pass on my thanks to all of you pioneers who watched it first and commented.
Keep up the good work !
yeah , sure , yeah
I got the joke at 13 minutes and 25 seconds. Do I win something.
a biden pat of the back and squeeze of the shoulders
she takes too long to get to the point. I get that she is being sarcastic, and has to make it clear, without saying it, but a little faster, less redundancies.
Watch at 2x speed
This is like telling a long story to get to the punchline. It's like; okay i get it. Space exploration is like saying lets start over on this newly discovered land over here. It's definitely not meant to help everyone.
I had no idea there can be someone more satirical than me...
Nor MEEE!
@The Op Gamer nah... What has the space ever done for me!?
@The Op Gamer Yes, I am fully aware of all those things and so is Emily in this video. as I said in my original comment, I just really like sarcasm...
“You had me in the first half, not gonna lie*
Ahhhh!!! Reading this comment section makes me so frustrated because a lot of people missed the point...
The reason for the heavy sarcasm was to point out the flaws in the opposing argument while at the same time supporting her own. She kept with the sarcasm to draw in an audience that would actually pay attention to what she was saying. It drew in people that agreed with the title or people that were willing to hear her entire argument. The heavy sarcasm exists in this speech to take the opposing arguments and point out their flaws, not to be cool or annoying. -_-;
Man, UA-cam ranting is really so fun
A very interesting and articulate woman. I love her sense of humor.
“We love movies about Mars, *especially* when they have Matt Damon in them”