Has Modi Introduced "Truer Secularism" and Appealed to "Aspiring India" or is He Spreading Fear?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 5 тра 2024
- Modi has introduced "a newer, truer secularism" and is appealing to "a modern India, an aspiring India": Surjit Bhalla to Karan Thapar for The Wire.
...........................................
In an extremely arguementative if not outrightly quarrelsome interview, the well-known and highly regarded economist, columnist and author, Surjit Bhalla, has said that he personally believes Narendra Modi has introduced “a newer, truer secularism”. Dr. Bhalla at first refused to answer follow-up questions but then agreed to do so. However be disregarded the fact BJP MPs and MLAs call Muslims Babar ki aulad and tell them to go to Pakistan or that the Chief Minister of UP taunts them with abba jaan or that Muslims are wrongly accused of love jihad, land jihad and cattle lynching, or when dharma sansads threaten genocide the government keeps quiet and has nothing to say. He would not answer the question how can this be true secularism.
In the interview to mark his new book ‘How We Vote: The Factors that Influence Voters’, Dr. Bhalla strongly defended his claim that “Modi’s consistent appeal is to a modern India, an aspiring India”. He refused to accept that Narendra Modi’s speeches of the last three weeks, which demonize and attack the Muslim community and create the fear that Muslims are going to grab reservations meant for OBCs, SCs and STs, contradict his claim that Modi is appealing to a modern India and an aspiring India.
The interview also discusses Mr. Bhalla’s claim, made in his book, that “economics determines elections”. It is pointed out to him that Mr. Modi, who won three consecutive victories in Gujarat and could be poised to win three more in Delhi, belies that analysis because for the last three weeks he has not campaigned on his government’s ten year economic record but, instead, by attacking the Muslim community and thus seeking to polarize Hindus and Muslims in the belief this will unite Hindus behind him and deliver the majority he wants. Dr. Bhalla vigorously denies that Mr. Modi’s campaign has belied his analysis.
On all three issues mentioned above, the interview was quarrelsome and aggressive. I will, therefore, not tell you more about the interview but leave you to see it for yourself. To be honest, its one huge and, often, unrelieved ding-dong. A fairly brutal punch up. You must decide for yourself what you make of the interview. I will not tell you more.
Join The Wire's UA-cam Membership and get exclusive content, member-only emojis, live interaction with The Wire's founders, editors and reporters and much more. Memberships to The Wire Crew start at Rs 89/month. / @thewirenews
It's sad that an economist like him doesn't acknowledge the fact that we live in a society not an economy. Btw what economic progress is he talking about? Economic progress of top 1% of the population (rich people).. What this government has done to the social fabric of this country is not hidden from anyone.. Kudos to you karan and shame on this so called economist
What an utter waste of time 😢
I can summarize what Bhalla wanted to say:
1. Price rise & unemployment are always among the concerns of Indian populace since eternity.
2. Actual data (or feeling) on price rise & unemployment determines the "degree of importance" attached to them.
3. Modi has worked on both (inflation is lesser than UPA era while unemployment is not, but still less than 2019)
4. Modi does mention development issues during campaign speech, along with polarization remarks. Those parts get less mention in social media or TV.
5. Modi doesn't need to advertise development much as those are supposed to be seen/felt and not heard.
6. Polarization enthusiasizes the voters to go to polling station & reminds core voters about commitment (for BJP it's ultra-RW Hindu).
Brilliantly done Karan!!! Bravo..
I can summarize what Bhalla wanted to say:
1. Price rise & unemployment are always among the concerns of Indian populace since eternity.
2. Actual data (or feeling) on price rise & unemployment determines the "degree of importance" attached to them.
3. Modi has worked on both (inflation is lesser than UPA era while unemployment is not, but still less than 2019)
4. Modi does mention development issues during campaign speech, along with polarization remarks. Those parts get less mention.
5. Modi doesn't need to advertise development much as those are supposed to be seen/felt and not heard.
6. Polarization enthusiasizes the voters to go to polling station & reminds core voters about commitment (for BJP it's ultra-RW Hindu).
What about rahul speaking against hindutva. Congress not attending ram mandir pran pratishtha as they dont want muslims to be offended. Very poorly conducted interview by thapar..His prejudice against pm modi was clearly visible
Karan Thapar is a national treasure ! He gets the cat out of the box regardless of how camouflaged the guest is.
I can summarize what Bhalla wanted to say:
1. Price rise & unemployment are always among the concerns of Indian populace since eternity.
2. Actual data (or feeling) on price rise & unemployment determines the "degree of importance" attached to them.
3. Modi has worked on both (inflation is lesser than UPA era while unemployment is not, but still less than 2019)
4. Modi does mention development issues during campaign speech, along with polarization remarks. Those parts get less mention in social media or TV.
5. Modi doesn't need to advertise development much as those are supposed to be seen/felt and not heard.
6. Polarization enthusiasizes the voters to go to polling station & reminds core voters about commitment (for BJP it's ultra-RW Hindu).
There is 1000x more hate speech against hindus everyday since UDHAYNIDHI STATEMENT and since 1947. THAT IS KARAN THAPARS SECULARISM
Bhalla is a paid campaigner for BJP.
Abey Bhalla explain...how calling for a genocide is a newer secularism ?😡
Very well Karan. You have clearly exposed these hypocrites👺 like Bhalla who is telling that thrashing someone but giving them toilet and water is secularism
I can summarize what Bhalla wanted to say:
1. Price rise & unemployment are always among the concerns of Indian populace since eternity.
2. Actual data (or feeling) on price rise & unemployment determines the "degree of importance" attached to them.
3. Modi has worked on both (inflation is lesser than UPA era while unemployment is not, but still less than 2019)
4. Modi does mention development issues during campaign speech, along with polarization remarks. Those parts get less mention.
5. Modi doesn't need to advertise development much as those are supposed to be seen/felt and not heard.
6. Polarization enthusiasizes the voters to go to polling station & reminds core voters about commitment (for BJP it's ultra-RW Hindu).
Godi economist
Oh you meant Karan 😂😂😂😂😂
Karan made him drink water in the first 5 mins just like Modi had too . .
I can summarize what Bhalla wanted to say:
1. Price rise & unemployment are always among the concerns of Indian populace since eternity.
2. Actual data (or feeling) on price rise & unemployment determines the "degree of importance" attached to them.
3. Modi has worked on both (inflation is lesser than UPA era while unemployment is not, but still less than 2019)
4. Modi does mention development issues during campaign speech, along with polarization remarks. Those parts get less mention.
5. Modi doesn't need to advertise development much as those are supposed to be seen/felt and not heard.
6. Polarization enthusiasizes the voters to go to polling station & reminds core voters about commitment (for BJP it's ultra-RW Hindu).
Mr Karan Thapar, a great journalist with brain and does unbiased and true reports. Karan jee fixed Bhalla in right way.
I can summarize what Bhalla wanted to say:
1. Price rise & unemployment are always among the concerns of Indian populace since eternity.
2. Actual data (or feeling) on price rise & unemployment determines the "degree of importance" attached to them.
3. Modi has worked on both (inflation is lesser than UPA era while unemployment is not, but still less than 2019)
4. Modi does mention development issues during campaign speech, along with polarization remarks. Those parts get less mention in social media or TV.
5. Modi doesn't need to advertise development much as those are supposed to be seen/felt and not heard.
6. Polarization enthusiasizes the voters to go to polling stations & reminds core voters about commitment (for BJP it's ultra-RW Hindu).
@@dipjyotimitra186bhalla can't accept the fact.
Inflation is an issue, unemployment is an issue and modi wants "Aspire India" only for Hindus
Very painful to watch as he never answered any question straightforward..
I can summarize what Bhalla wanted to say:
1. Price rise & unemployment are always among the concerns of Indian populace since eternity.
2. Actual data (or feeling) on price rise & unemployment determines the "degree of importance" attached to them.
3. Modi has worked on both (inflation is lesser than UPA era while unemployment is not, but still less than 2019)
4. Modi does mention development issues during campaign speech, along with polarization remarks. Those parts get less mention.
5. Modi doesn't need to advertise development much as those are supposed to be seen/felt and not heard.
6. Polarization enthusiasizes the voters to go to polling station & reminds core voters about commitment (for BJP it's ultra-RW Hindu).
There is 1000x more hate speech against hindus everyday since UDHAYNIDHI STATEMENT and since 1947. THAT IS KARAN THAPARS SECULARISM
Am surprised at the utter rubbish that mr bhalla is trying to project
I can summarize what Bhalla wanted to say:
1. Price rise & unemployment are always among the concerns of Indian populace since eternity.
2. Actual data (or feeling) on price rise & unemployment determines the "degree of importance" attached to them.
3. Modi has worked on both (inflation is lesser than UPA era while unemployment is not, but still less than 2019)
4. Modi does mention development issues during campaign speech, along with polarization remarks. Those parts get less mention in social media or TV.
5. Modi doesn't need to advertise development much as those are supposed to be seen/felt and not heard.
6. Polarization enthusiasizes the voters to go to polling station & reminds core voters about commitment (for BJP it's ultra-RW Hindu).
7. I didn't understand Bhalla's secularism point.
@@dipjyotimitra186
I beg to differ from your point of view. Two voting phases later, the ruling party seems to hardly mention the economy ,development,unemployment or inflation.Instead, there’s been a hard pivot to communal content. From inflammatory speeches at rallies, to animated videos warning that the Congress, if elected, would distribute Hindu wealth and property to Muslims. Why isn’t the ruling party talking about its economic wins but instead steering a large part of its narrative and communication around religion, the Ram temple and a familiar yet toxic anti-Muslim narrative? Apparently there is nothing to talk about.
There is 1000x more hate speech against hindus everyday since UDHAYNIDHI STATEMENT and since 1947. THAT IS KARAN THAPARS SECULARISM
Bhalla is a smooth-talking, white-collar, soft-spoken BJP stooge. Thanks for interviewing and exposing him, Karan but it’s tiring to listen to right-wing propaganda experts.
I can summarize what Bhalla wanted to say:
1. Price rise & unemployment are always among the concerns of Indian populace since eternity.
2. Actual data (or feeling) on price rise & unemployment determines the "degree of importance" attached to them.
3. Modi has worked on both (inflation is lesser than UPA era while unemployment is not, but still less than 2019)
4. Modi does mention development issues during campaign speech, along with polarization remarks. Those parts get less mention in social media or TV.
5. Modi doesn't need to advertise development much as those are supposed to be seen/felt and not heard.
6. Polarization enthusiasizes the voters to go to polling station & reminds core voters about commitment (for BJP it's ultra-RW Hindu).
7. I didn't understand Bhalla's secularism point.
It hurts to listen to people like Mr. Bhalla.
Problem is we live with them and they vote for governments like this and then everybody suffers
I can summarize what Bhalla wanted to say:
1. Price rise & unemployment are always among the concerns of Indian populace since eternity.
2. Actual data (or feeling) on price rise & unemployment determines the "degree of importance" attached to them.
3. Modi has worked on both (inflation is lesser than UPA era while unemployment is not, but still less than 2019)
4. Modi does mention development issues during campaign speech, along with polarization remarks. Those parts get less mention in social media or TV.
5. Modi doesn't need to advertise development much as those are supposed to be seen/felt and not heard.
6. Polarization enthusiasizes the voters to go to polling station & reminds core voters about commitment (for BJP it's ultra-RW Hindu).
7. I didn't understand Bhalla's secularism point.
There is 1000x more hate speech against hindus everyday since UDHAYNIDHI STATEMENT and since 1947. THAT IS KARAN THAPARS SECULARISM
@@dipjyotimitra186 You summarised it well 👌
How come Bhalla is considered an economist, seems like a slippery fish 😅
Bhalla is a lucky fellow. Being chosen by Modi as an economic advisor, he has to be loyal and in trying to be that he is laughable.
I can summarize what Bhalla wanted to say:
1. Price rise & unemployment are always among the concerns of Indian populace since eternity.
2. Actual data (or feeling) on price rise & unemployment determines the "degree of importance" attached to them.
3. Modi has worked on both (inflation is lesser than UPA era while unemployment is not, but still less than 2019)
4. Modi does mention development issues during campaign speech, along with polarization remarks. Those parts get less mention in social media or TV.
5. Modi doesn't need to advertise development much as those are supposed to be seen/felt and not heard.
6. Polarization enthusiasizes the voters to go to polling station & reminds core voters about commitment (for BJP it's ultra-RW Hindu).
7. I didn't understand Bhalla's secularism point.
Well done, Karan Sir. You have exposed and nailed blind followers of a Dictator.
Do you think Dr Bhalla gamble in horse racing ? Well I do :) I think he makes money (or loses it) by gambling in horse racing
I can summarize what Bhalla wanted to say:
1. Price rise & unemployment are always among the concerns of Indian populace.
2. Actual data (or feeling) on price rise & unemployment determines the "degree of importance" attached to them.
3. Modi has worked on both (inflation is lesser than UPA era while unemployment is not, but still less than 2019)
4. Modi does mention development issues during campaign speech, along with polarization remarks. Those parts get less mention.
5. Modi doesn't need to advertise development much as those are supposed to be seen/felt and not heard.
6. Polarization enthusiasizes the voters to go to polling station & reminds core voters about commitment (for BJP it's ultra-RW Hindu).
Bhalla is a hypocrite and a Modi government stooge well done Karan you exposed him thoroughly.
I can summarize what Bhalla wanted to say:
1. Price rise & unemployment are always among the concerns of Indian populace since eternity.
2. Actual data (or feeling) on price rise & unemployment determines the "degree of importance" attached to them.
3. Modi has worked on both (inflation is lesser than UPA era while unemployment is not, but still less than 2019)
4. Modi does mention development issues during campaign speech, along with polarization remarks. Those parts get less mention in social media or TV.
5. Modi doesn't need to advertise development much as those are supposed to be seen/felt and not heard.
6. Polarization enthusiasizes the voters to go to polling station & reminds core voters about commitment (for BJP it's ultra-RW Hindu).
7. I didn't understand Bhalla's secularism point.
There is 1000x more hate speech against hindus everyday since UDHAYNIDHI STATEMENT and since 1947. THAT IS KARAN THAPARS SECULARISM
Bhalla is laughably naive and a bhakt by any other name. A waterload waste of time.
Thanks for exposingi bhalla and his version of secularism. Bravo
Karan wanted a change of ideology on his show. So Bhakt Bhalla to break the monotony.
$h!t load = Go Bar.
Andhnamazi
True .. such a darpok
Pleading for “ Padma Bhushan “
I can summarize what Bhalla wanted to say:
1. Price rise & unemployment are always among the concerns of Indian populace since eternity.
2. Actual data (or feeling) on price rise & unemployment determines the "degree of importance" attached to them.
3. Modi has worked on both (inflation is lesser than UPA era while unemployment is not, but still less than 2019)
4. Modi does mention development issues during campaign speech, along with polarization remarks. Those parts get less mention in social media or TV.
5. Modi doesn't need to advertise development much as those are supposed to be seen/felt and not heard.
6. Polarization enthusiasizes the voters to go to polling station & reminds core voters about commitment (for BJP it's ultra-RW Hindu).
7. I didn't understand Bhalla's secularism point.
There is 1000x more hate speech against hindus everyday since UDHAYNIDHI STATEMENT and since 1947. THAT IS KARAN THAPARS SECULARISM
Surjit Bhalla has made a very brave effort to defend Narenda Modi. However, it goes without saying that the past ten years have ruined India and pushed it to the brink of disaster. Let's hope that all this will change once the current dispensation gets voted out of office, and the INDIA alliance consolidate the reins.
Liked your comment. For an economist and author defending Modi by quoting Mitchell about his use of language/actions is truly scandalous. Everyday Modi's speeches are filled with hatred and divisiveness about buffaloes mangalsutras should be overlooked though unemployment is 60%+.
Haa Bhai ab atanki hamla nahi ho raha development ho raha hai startup ban rahe hai, digitalization hua hai, tum sale wahi purana time deserve karte ho .
Bhalla, is Modi 's stug and he has become out dated
I can summarize what Bhalla wanted to say:
1. Price rise & unemployment are always among the concerns of Indian populace since eternity.
2. Actual data (or feeling) on price rise & unemployment determines the "degree of importance" attached to them.
3. Modi has worked on both (inflation is lesser than UPA era while unemployment is not, but still less than 2019)
4. Modi does mention development issues during campaign speech, along with polarization remarks. Those parts get less mention in social media or TV.
5. Modi doesn't need to advertise development much as those are supposed to be seen/felt and not heard.
6. Polarization enthusiasizes the voters to go to polling station & reminds core voters about commitment (for BJP it's ultra-RW Hindu).
7. I didn't understand Bhalla's secularism point.
Mr. Thapar, you were patient & also very objective in your questioning. Mr. Bhalla's deliberate attempt to appear ignorant & non-responsive arguments shows clearly his incompetence. He has harmed Modi more, than defend his policies in this interview. More such ill-meaning fools should be invited on your program to demonstrate their non-intellectual prowess.
I can summarize what Bhalla wanted to say:
1. Price rise & unemployment are always among the concerns of Indian populace since eternity.
2. Actual data (or feeling) on price rise & unemployment determines the "degree of importance" attached to them.
3. Modi has worked on both (inflation is lesser than UPA era while unemployment is not, but still less than 2019)
4. Modi does mention development issues during campaign speech, along with polarization remarks. Those parts get less mention in social media or TV.
5. Modi doesn't need to advertise development much as those are supposed to be seen/felt and not heard.
6. Polarization enthusiasizes the voters to go to polling station & reminds core voters about commitment (for BJP it's ultra-RW Hindu).
7. I didn't understand Bhalla's secularism point.
This is what's called journalism! Hats off to you sir.
I can summarize what Bhalla wanted to say:
1. Price rise & unemployment are always among the concerns of Indian populace since eternity.
2. Actual data (or feeling) on price rise & unemployment determines the "degree of importance" attached to them.
3. Modi has worked on both (inflation is lesser than UPA era while unemployment is not, but still less than 2019)
4. Modi does mention development issues during campaign speech, along with polarization remarks. Those parts get less mention in social media or TV.
5. Modi doesn't need to advertise development much as those are supposed to be seen/felt and not heard.
6. Polarization enthusiasizes the voters to go to polling station & reminds core voters about commitment (for BJP it's ultra-RW Hindu).
7. I didn't understand Bhalla's secularism point.
There is 1000x more hate speech against hindus everyday since UDHAYNIDHI STATEMENT and since 1947. THAT IS KARAN THAPARS SECULARISM
Let Bhalla tell under whose regime rate of inflation was highest. 😂
I can summarize what Bhalla wanted to say:
1. Price rise & unemployment are always among the concerns of Indian populace since eternity.
2. Actual data (or feeling) on price rise & unemployment determines the "degree of importance" attached to them.
3. Modi has worked on both (inflation is lesser than UPA era while unemployment is not, but still less than 2019)
4. Modi does mention development issues during campaign speech, along with polarization remarks. Those parts get less mention in social media or TV.
5. Modi doesn't need to advertise development much as those are supposed to be seen/felt and not heard.
6. Polarization enthusiasizes the voters to go to polling station & reminds core voters about commitment (for BJP it's ultra-RW Hindu).
7. I didn't understand Bhalla's secularism point.
Bhalla is caught between a rock and a hard place!! Today Bhalla is exposed as a true NARCISIST.
I can summarize what Bhalla wanted to say:
1. Price rise & unemployment are always among the concerns of Indian populace since eternity.
2. Actual data (or feeling) on price rise & unemployment determines the "degree of importance" attached to them.
3. Modi has worked on both (inflation is lesser than UPA era while unemployment is not, but still less than 2019)
4. Modi does mention development issues during campaign speech, along with polarization remarks. Those parts get less mention.
5. Modi doesn't need to advertise development much as those are supposed to be seen/felt and not heard.
6. Polarization enthusiasizes the voters to go to polling station & reminds core voters about commitment (for BJP it's ultra-RW Hindu).
🤣🤣🤣
There is 1000x more hate speech against hindus everyday since UDHAYNIDHI STATEMENT and since 1947. THAT IS KARAN THAPARS SECULARISM
Mr. Thapar, every passing day you and The Wire give me more and more reasons to keep you and the journalism 0f The Wire in highest esteem.
I can summarize what Bhalla wanted to say:
1. Price rise & unemployment are always among the concerns of Indian populace since eternity.
2. Actual data (or feeling) on price rise & unemployment determines the "degree of importance" attached to them.
3. Modi has worked on both (inflation is lesser than UPA era while unemployment is not, but still less than 2019)
4. Modi does mention development issues during campaign speech, along with polarization remarks. Those parts get less mention in social media or TV.
5. Modi doesn't need to advertise development much as those are supposed to be seen/felt and not heard.
6. Polarization enthusiasizes the voters to go to polling station & reminds core voters about commitment (for BJP it's ultra-RW Hindu).
7. I didn't understand Bhalla's secularism point.
India is a secular country. What about press freedom.
I can summarize what Bhalla wanted to say:
1. Price rise & unemployment are always among the concerns of Indian populace since eternity.
2. Actual data (or feeling) on price rise & unemployment determines the "degree of importance" attached to them.
3. Modi has worked on both (inflation is lesser than UPA era while unemployment is not, but still less than 2019)
4. Modi does mention development issues during campaign speech, along with polarization remarks. Those parts get less mention in social media or TV.
5. Modi doesn't need to advertise development much as those are supposed to be seen/felt and not heard.
6. Polarization enthusiasizes the voters to go to polling station & reminds core voters about commitment (for BJP it's ultra-RW Hindu).
Bhalla is just avoiding the questions 😅
I can summarize what Bhalla wanted to say:
1. Price rise & unemployment are always among the concerns of Indian populace since eternity.
2. Actual data (or feeling) on price rise & unemployment determines the "degree of importance" attached to them.
3. Modi has worked on both (inflation is lesser than UPA era while unemployment is not, but still less than 2019)
4. Modi does mention development issues during campaign speech, along with polarization remarks. Those parts get less mention in social media or TV.
5. Modi doesn't need to advertise development much as those are supposed to be seen/felt and not heard.
6. Polarization enthusiasizes the voters to go to polling station & reminds core voters about commitment (for BJP it's ultra-RW Hindu).
7. I didn't understand Bhalla's secularism point.
Bhalla should be sent on a vacation to Manipur. Surely he will confirm Modi's true and newer secularism 😅
💯
I can summarize what Bhalla wanted to say:
1. Price rise & unemployment are always among the concerns of Indian populace since eternity.
2. Actual data (or feeling) on price rise & unemployment determines the "degree of importance" attached to them.
3. Modi has worked on both (inflation is lesser than UPA era while unemployment is not, but still less than 2019)
4. Modi does mention development issues during campaign speech, along with polarization remarks. Those parts get less mention in social media or TV.
5. Modi doesn't need to advertise development much as those are supposed to be seen/felt and not heard.
6. Polarization enthusiasizes the voters to go to polling station & reminds core voters about commitment (for BJP it's ultra-RW Hindu).
7. I didn't understand Bhalla's secularism point.
There is 1000x more hate speech against hindus everyday since UDHAYNIDHI STATEMENT and since 1947. THAT IS KARAN THAPARS SECULARISM
@@dipjyotimitra186I got your point
Modi's secularism is as inclusive as Sunny Leone's bikini
Not the thong. We need thong rights.
😂😂😂 if metaphors got awards ..ok here 🥇
A simile actually but still😅
Distasteful comment.
@@ceva7727Not really! It is actually brilliant and within boundaries. Mo connotations, just strait comment.
Surjit Bhalla successfully transformed from mediocre economist to Modi bhakt
🤣🤣🤣🤣
I can summarize what Bhalla wanted to say:
1. Price rise & unemployment are always among the concerns of Indian populace since eternity.
2. Actual data (or feeling) on price rise & unemployment determines the "degree of importance" attached to them.
3. Modi has worked on both (inflation is lesser than UPA era while unemployment is not, but still less than 2019)
4. Modi does mention development issues during campaign speech, along with polarization remarks. Those parts get less mention in social media or TV.
5. Modi doesn't need to advertise development much as those are supposed to be seen/felt and not heard.
6. Polarization enthusiasizes the voters to go to polling station & reminds core voters about commitment (for BJP it's ultra-RW Hindu).
7. I didn't understand Bhalla's secularism point.
Godi economist
Karan, done!. It's unbelievable that some individuals choose not to acknowledge the concerning agenda of this government. What's even more troubling is that this person is not unintelligent, implying they're consciously supporting this government and Modi, despite the injustices they perpetrate- both economic and social."
I can summarize what Bhalla wanted to say:
1. Price rise & unemployment are always among the concerns of Indian populace since eternity.
2. Actual data (or feeling) on price rise & unemployment determines the "degree of importance" attached to them.
3. Modi has worked on both (inflation is lesser than UPA era while unemployment is not, but still less than 2019)
4. Modi does mention development issues during campaign speech, along with polarization remarks. Those parts get less mention in social media or TV.
5. Modi doesn't need to advertise development much as those are supposed to be seen/felt and not heard.
6. Polarization enthusiasizes the voters to go to polling station & reminds core voters about commitment (for BJP it's ultra-RW Hindu).
7. I didn't understand Bhalla's secularism point.
Abolish terms secularism from the books. It has torn apart India than uniting.
You're the one tearing it apart. It didn't tear us until the Sanghis decided to divide everyone along those lines. I hope you'll some day grow up to see it as clearly as the rest of the country sees it
I can summarize what Bhalla wanted to say:
1. Price rise & unemployment are always among the concerns of Indian populace since eternity.
2. Actual data (or feeling) on price rise & unemployment determines the "degree of importance" attached to them.
3. Modi has worked on both (inflation is lesser than UPA era while unemployment is not, but still less than 2019)
4. Modi does mention development issues during campaign speech, along with polarization remarks. Those parts get less mention in social media or TV.
5. Modi doesn't need to advertise development much as those are supposed to be seen/felt and not heard.
6. Polarization enthusiasizes the voters to go to polling station & reminds core voters about commitment (for BJP it's ultra-RW Hindu).
7. I didn't understand Bhalla's secularism point.
There is 1000x more hate speech against hindus everyday since UDHAYNIDHI STATEMENT and since 1947. THAT IS KARAN THAPARS SECULARISM
Surjit bhalla is a representative of top 200-500 families owning nearly 57-60% of wealth,because that stand helps him in maintaining his lifestyle.
Why Karan is wasting his time interviewing?
Karan Thapars grandfather presented a saropa and purse of 1 Lakh Rupees to General Dyer after the Jalianwala Bagh massacre .... the man is a progeny of the collaborators
So, is Kaushik Bsau, Pronab Sen & many others.
So?
Bhalla is wasting everyone's time.
Only Karan is talking shouting howling for 90% of time .. not allowing Dr Bhalla to talk ..
On the contrary I think bhalla wasted his own time
I can summarize what Bhalla wanted to say:
1. Price rise & unemployment are always among the concerns of Indian populace since eternity.
2. Actual data (or feeling) on price rise & unemployment determines the "degree of importance" attached to them.
3. Modi has worked on both (inflation is lesser than UPA era while unemployment is not, but still less than 2019)
4. Modi does mention development issues during campaign speech, along with polarization remarks. Those parts get less mention in social media or TV.
5. Modi doesn't need to advertise development much as those are supposed to be seen/felt and not heard.
6. Polarization enthusiasizes the voters to go to polling station & reminds core voters about commitment (for BJP it's ultra-RW Hindu).
It's not bhalla. Thapar is equally the culprit in wasting our time
There is 1000x more hate speech against hindus everyday since UDHAYNIDHI STATEMENT and since 1947. THAT IS KARAN THAPARS SECULARISM
Mr. Bhalla needs medical HELP ...🤦🏾♀️🤦🏾♀️🤦🏾♀️
for sure
Sure he is very sick!!😂
Very true 😁😁😊
Karan Thapar too needs medical help. Otherwise he would not waste our time by bringing this goth onto his show.
@@Khulsimsim😳😁
Mr.Karan admire your persistence in asking questions,that the author feels uncomfortable
I can summarize what Bhalla wanted to say:
1. Price rise & unemployment are always among the concerns of Indian populace since eternity.
2. Actual data (or feeling) on price rise & unemployment determines the "degree of importance" attached to them.
3. Modi has worked on both (inflation is lesser than UPA era while unemployment is not, but still less than 2019)
4. Modi does mention development issues during campaign speech, along with polarization remarks. Those parts get less mention in social media or TV.
5. Modi doesn't need to advertise development much as those are supposed to be seen/felt and not heard.
6. Polarization enthusiasizes the voters to go to polling station & reminds core voters about commitment (for BJP it's ultra-RW Hindu).
7. I didn't understand Bhalla's secularism point.
What level we come down to. People like are economic advisor. Scary
It is a tragic event when Mr.Bhalla shaves clean his own subject to subjugate at the feet of Mr.Modi. It is really shocking to observe happenings at ex p.m house and now Bhalla
Thank you Karan for exposing these kind of people.
I can summarize what Bhalla wanted to say:
1. Price rise & unemployment are always among the concerns of Indian populace since eternity.
2. Actual data (or feeling) on price rise & unemployment determines the "degree of importance" attached to them.
3. Modi has worked on both (inflation is lesser than UPA era while unemployment is not, but still less than 2019)
4. Modi does mention development issues during campaign speech, along with polarization remarks. Those parts get less mention in social media or TV.
5. Modi doesn't need to advertise development much as those are supposed to be seen/felt and not heard.
6. Polarization enthusiasizes the voters to go to polling station & reminds core voters about commitment (for BJP it's ultra-RW Hindu).
7. I didn't understand Bhalla's secularism point.
Karan...You are actually THE BESTEST,,,,God Bless You.
I can summarize what Bhalla wanted to say:
1. Price rise & unemployment are always among the concerns of Indian populace since eternity.
2. Actual data (or feeling) on price rise & unemployment determines the "degree of importance" attached to them.
3. Modi has worked on both (inflation is lesser than UPA era while unemployment is not, but still less than 2019)
4. Modi does mention development issues during campaign speech, along with polarization remarks. Those parts get less mention in social media or TV.
5. Modi doesn't need to advertise development much as those are supposed to be seen/felt and not heard.
6. Polarization enthusiasizes the voters to go to polling station & reminds core voters about commitment (for BJP it's ultra-RW Hindu).
7. I didn't understand Bhalla's secularism point.
Mr. Thapar, Bravo !!! You are doing great service to nation by fixing sycophants' who mislead to our nation and doing big harm like Surjit Bhalla.
I can summarize what Bhalla wanted to say:
1. Price rise & unemployment are always among the concerns of Indian populace since eternity.
2. Actual data (or feeling) on price rise & unemployment determines the "degree of importance" attached to them.
3. Modi has worked on both (inflation is lesser than UPA era while unemployment is not, but still less than 2019)
4. Modi does mention development issues during campaign speech, along with polarization remarks. Those parts get less mention in social media or TV.
5. Modi doesn't need to advertise development much as those are supposed to be seen/felt and not heard.
6. Polarization enthusiasizes the voters to go to polling station & reminds core voters about commitment (for BJP it's ultra-RW Hindu).
There is 1000x more hate speech against hindus everyday since UDHAYNIDHI STATEMENT and since 1947. THAT IS KARAN THAPARS SECULARISM
Why did he cameout with thebook during election period. He could have waited till 4th June. He wants to pray Modi has made India a viksat Bharat. Which he must not as an economist.
Why not? This is capitalism. He has every right to launch his book and his views. He doesn’t need your approval. I trust him
He want Padma bhushan
Is this a matter of question? He clearly spreads religious hatred by not taking action on Hindu religious mobs which attack the Muslims and Christians and this ultimately destroys the brotherhood between the religions. He is anti-secular and pro-Hindu.
I can summarize what Bhalla wanted to say:
1. Price rise & unemployment are always among the concerns of Indian populace since eternity.
2. Actual data (or feeling) on price rise & unemployment determines the "degree of importance" attached to them.
3. Modi has worked on both (inflation is lesser than UPA era while unemployment is not, but still less than 2019)
4. Modi does mention development issues during campaign speech, along with polarization remarks. Those parts get less mention in social media or TV.
5. Modi doesn't need to advertise development much as those are supposed to be seen/felt and not heard.
6. Polarization enthusiasizes the voters to go to polling station & reminds core voters about commitment (for BJP it's ultra-RW Hindu).
7. I didn't understand Bhalla's secularism point.
@@dipjyotimitra186 My vote is only for those who don't propagate caste, tribe or religious hatred and violence. Who can work towards reducing social and economic inequality and poverty. I want a peaceful, prosperous and healthy India..!! We wish others like this for festivals but do we really want our lives, country and the world to be like that unless we work towards making it a reality..!!? Thank you and God Bless..!!.🙏💐🙌
There is 1000x more hate speech against hindus everyday since UDHAYNIDHI STATEMENT and since 1947. THAT IS KARAN THAPARS SECULARISM
@@giridhark9889well said
Mr. Surjit Bhalla is a known Modi bhakt
Mr Karan Thapar ji why you interview Surjit Bhalla. He say thatMr x creat many jobs. What a great joke. Iam not interested.
I can summarize what Bhalla wanted to say:
1. Price rise & unemployment are always among the concerns of Indian populace since eternity.
2. Actual data (or feeling) on price rise & unemployment determines the "degree of importance" attached to them.
3. Modi has worked on both (inflation is lesser than UPA era while unemployment is not, but still less than 2019)
4. Modi does mention development issues during campaign speech, along with polarization remarks. Those parts get less mention in social media or TV.
5. Modi doesn't need to advertise development much as those are supposed to be seen/felt and not heard.
6. Polarization enthusiasizes the voters to go to polling station & reminds core voters about commitment (for BJP it's ultra-RW Hindu).
7. I didn't understand Bhalla's secularism point.
Pseudo secular with a pseudo accent! This gentleman is a survivor and he'll do anything for that. Am reminded of the time whem he used give regular lectures on world economics and trends at our company. Hot wind and accent and NOTHING else. Amazing that he's gone as far as he has
Mr. Karan nailed it.
Mr Thapar, great for exposing such people
I can summarize what Bhalla wanted to say:
1. Price rise & unemployment are always among the concerns of Indian populace since eternity.
2. Actual data (or feeling) on price rise & unemployment determines the "degree of importance" attached to them.
3. Modi has worked on both (inflation is lesser than UPA era while unemployment is not, but still less than 2019)
4. Modi does mention development issues during campaign speech, along with polarization remarks. Those parts get less mention in social media or TV.
5. Modi doesn't need to advertise development much as those are supposed to be seen/felt and not heard.
6. Polarization enthusiasizes the voters to go to polling station & reminds core voters about commitment (for BJP it's ultra-RW Hindu).
There is 1000x more hate speech against hindus everyday since UDHAYNIDHI STATEMENT and since 1947. THAT IS KARAN THAPARS SECULARISM
He is Fund Manager and BJP's pet, one time he PM's finance commision. He is good for patting his back all time.
I can summarize what Bhalla wanted to say:
1. Price rise & unemployment are always among the concerns of Indian populace since eternity.
2. Actual data (or feeling) on price rise & unemployment determines the "degree of importance" attached to them.
3. Modi has worked on both (inflation is lesser than UPA era while unemployment is not, but still less than 2019)
4. Modi does mention development issues during campaign speech, along with polarization remarks. Those parts get less mention in social media or TV.
5. Modi doesn't need to advertise development much as those are supposed to be seen/felt and not heard.
6. Polarization enthusiasizes the voters to go to polling station & reminds core voters about commitment (for BJP it's ultra-RW Hindu).
7. I didn't understand Bhalla's secularism point.
There is 1000x more hate speech against hindus everyday since UDHAYNIDHI STATEMENT and since 1947. THAT IS KARAN THAPARS SECULARISM
There can not be hypocrisy and duplicity worse than this. A big joke that he is considered a very knowledgeable economist. Kudos to Karan for exposing him.
Dr. Bhalla is an academic and is not practical in thought and words. He is unfit for providing any explanations of what goes on in his mind.
I can summarize what Bhalla wanted to say:
1. Price rise & unemployment are always among the concerns of Indian populace since eternity.
2. Actual data (or feeling) on price rise & unemployment determines the "degree of importance" attached to them.
3. Modi has worked on both (inflation is lesser than UPA era while unemployment is not, but still less than 2019)
4. Modi does mention development issues during campaign speech, along with polarization remarks. Those parts get less mention in social media or TV.
5. Modi doesn't need to advertise development much as those are supposed to be seen/felt and not heard.
6. Polarization enthusiasizes the voters to go to polling station & reminds core voters about commitment (for BJP it's ultra-RW Hindu).
7. I didn't understand Bhalla's secularism point.
This guy is completely dishonest. Dr Bhalla go home.
One word that could capture the essence of arguing with an insane person is "futile." It conveys the sense of attempting to reason with someone who may not be receptive to logic or reality.
Sir This person wants to throw chilly powder in your eyes Not seeing the facts.He is Bhakt 9:04
Surjit Bhalla was caught between the jaws of a crocodile called Karan Thapar. Didn't know how to release himself.. By the way, Bhalla drank enough water, unlike Modi 😂 and the interview was inconclusive! Well done, KT. 🎉❤
Each economist can not be a good interviewer. I see this event same as our today's PM Modi wasn't able to give your interview as the then CM of Gujarat. This reflects clearly how far our respective members of our society have come and r fleeing from a genuine question since last 10 years. Karan sir, I appreciate your courage to emphasize the main objectives regularly time to time. Thank you so much .
you can imagine the state of collective intellect of the country when such people are called intellectuals and are financial advisers. We are on the road to middle ages. Bon Voyage!
I can summarize what Bhalla wanted to say:
1. Price rise & unemployment are always among the concerns of Indian populace since eternity.
2. Actual data (or feeling) on price rise & unemployment determines the "degree of importance" attached to them.
3. Modi has worked on both (inflation is lesser than UPA era while unemployment is not, but still less than 2019)
4. Modi does mention development issues during campaign speech, along with polarization remarks. Those parts get less mention in social media or TV.
5. Modi doesn't need to advertise development much as those are supposed to be seen/felt and not heard.
6. Polarization enthusiasizes the voters to go to polling station & reminds core voters about commitment (for BJP it's ultra-RW Hindu).
7. I didn't understand Bhalla's secularism point.
Bhallas posture itself is saying he has no answers to Karan but trying to convince his lies. His biggest lie is he says unemployment is lowest whereas it is the highest under Modis fascist regime.
Bhalla exudes fascism with his every word!
He could not answer question posed by Karan. Kept on drinking water and sweating. He mistook Mr Thapar with somebody else. He should confine himself to TV Channels. Ended up making a ass of himself.
You are spot on.
Chopra jee , Mr Bhalla knows Karan too well ..
Modi refused interview by Karan long back ..Karan is still interviewing people ..Modi became CM / PM twice ..
Don't make too much of Karan
A person who does not have the courage to look into the eyes or the camera, has a lot to hide in the background. Indians (educated and otherwise) have sense to understand the motives of any writer.
I can summarize what Bhalla wanted to say:
1. Price rise & unemployment are always among the concerns of Indian populace since eternity.
2. Actual data (or feeling) on price rise & unemployment determines the "degree of importance" attached to them.
3. Modi has worked on both (inflation is lesser than UPA era while unemployment is not, but still less than 2019)
4. Modi does mention development issues during campaign speech, along with polarization remarks. Those parts get less mention in social media or TV.
5. Modi doesn't need to advertise development much as those are supposed to be seen/felt and not heard.
6. Polarization enthusiasizes the voters to go to polling station & reminds core voters about commitment (for BJP it's ultra-RW Hindu).
7. I didn't understand Bhalla's secularism point.
@@dipjyotimitra186 Of course money set apart for the development of women', was fully used for advertisement (not utilized for what it was set apart).
Insurance money given to dead Indians, all with the same cell phone
CAG report of corruption worth 7.5 lakh crores, 5 times more than the accused 2G scam. It was never proven in court till date.
25 lakh crores written off of thr loans given to big industrialists while loans to students and farmers were not
Raping, gang raping, naked parading of Indian women, disrespecting women wrestler, etc etc and on and on
All the above surely tells how developed our country has become in the last 10 years.
@@dipjyotimitra186 7.5 lakh crores corruption as per CAG report. 10 years of defaming women- raping, gang raping and naked parading. Is this the true secularism
He has no answers
Excellent Mr Thapar 👏👏👏
I think Mr Surjit Balla is from Utopia
No. From Gaushala!😊
no he gets paid by BJP
😂😂😂
Totally fake discussion from Bhalla He is paid person Trying to demolish your Basic Questions 11:10 11:12
Well done Thapar ji for exposing Mr bhalla. Mr bhalla showing smartness which u politely defused.
He is beating around the bush. 😂
Wicked always have different context.
Well done , Karan ❤️
Well done Mr. Karan Thapar 👍👍
I see the blind Dhritarashtra in this man.
Blind followers will answer anything but the question. Such a shame. He kept on beating around the bush.. 😮
INDIA GATHABANDAN JITEGA
😂😊
Sapne mai
There is 1000x more hate speech against hindus everyday since UDHAYNIDHI STATEMENT and since 1947. THAT IS KARAN THAPARS SECULARISM
He was not given a chance to express himself. Perhaps because he was going to say something in support of Modi.
Thank you for kicking out this man mid way through the interview
An andhbhakt hands down!
Unemployment is a big problem. Government has failed miserably.
When your ears are closed, your mind closes. When you question, have the patience to listen.
Well done karan...you are truly awesome..he was squirming in his seat
shame on you Dr Bhalla !! all the earlier respect i had for you just vaporised ...just refused to respond ...u were not prepared or just filibustering ??
What does secularism means for Mr Bhalla?
Exclusion of a community??
Is he drunk on some ignorance?
Congress was an Islamist and Evangelist force and BJP is Hindutvawadi. No one has ever been secular.
Mr Bhalla thinks differently, people can have different views about facts in modern and aspiring India.
@@suribhaskarplease search the meaning of the words secularism and equity
@@AdityaKumar-qu7jv Secularism is only related to Hindu there is no concept of secularity in Muslim world
@@suribhaskarMr Bhaskar I hope your parents have had a house since you were born,right. I lost mine under this regime so I don't understand what has he done for a Hindu Brahmin like me , so I believe only helping a few cronies isn't exclusive growth. And oh yes the house that you and I were so privileged to live in where made during the Congress regime
Hatsoff Mr Thapar.Your arguments are compelling and reassuring.Thanks
In the new bharat the word secularism is irrelevant
I can summarize what Bhalla wanted to say:
1. Price rise & unemployment are always among the concerns of Indian populace since eternity.
2. Actual data (or feeling) on price rise & unemployment determines the "degree of importance" attached to them.
3. Modi has worked on both (inflation is lesser than UPA era while unemployment is not, but still less than 2019)
4. Modi does mention development issues during campaign speech, along with polarization remarks. Those parts get less mention in social media or TV.
5. Modi doesn't need to advertise development much as those are supposed to be seen/felt and not heard.
6. Polarization enthusiasizes the voters to go to polling station & reminds core voters about commitment (for BJP it's ultra-RW Hindu).
7. I didn't understand Bhalla's secularism point.
He has his foot in his mouth 😢
Bhalla got some Modi bashing 😂
The author of the book seems to be living in an imaginary world. Kudos to you karan for your bold attempt to pull him out of it but he is so deeply entrenched in it that he cannot wriggle out of it. God save the readers.
Dr. Bhalla has come prepared with a fixed message.
This bhalla isn't good enough to put into dahi for making DAHI-BHALLA even, forget about unbiased views about economic condition of India under Modi's rule. This interview was a waste of time and resources.
Your language shows how great intellectuals are following another great intellectual Karan Thapar 😂
I typically watch Karan's interviews all the way through. Here, Bhalla is simply wasting time and making a joke of himself by not answering a single question. Does he think Karan's audience are fools? Kudos to Karan for holding Bhalla's feet to the fire.
I thought an interviewer asks questions, allows guest to answer and lets viewers decided. This looked so strange !
This guest provided some real comedy.
He is a Modi Bhakt
Andh bhakt.. literally 😂😂
Hate is not sustainable and hence modi will be gone sooner than one believes from the political screen as his own people will not tolerate him the moment he loses the votes.
Thanks, Karan for exposing the author.
Not a single Muslim MP in the cabinet, or in the BJP party in the Parliament
This guy is a waste of time. Shifts his base based on who is in power.
Petrol was 60/- and today it is 110/- . Gas was 600/- and today it is 1100/- . Food inflation is high. Modi is talking about infiltrators and lying through his teeth on many issues.
Petrol was Rs 16 per liter and Gas Rs 62 when ,I was young. Also rate of inflation was highest during Rajiv Gandhi regime.MMS tried to break his record .😂
Food inflation high? Onion , potato etc are still same as 2012. Oil depends on world affairs. In usa also oil prices went high......grow up!
@@agarvipul Vegetable prices are not that high but food inflation isn't just about vegetables. Prices of pulses have gone up considerably in the last 5-6 years. Even price of mustard oil went up a lot during 2020 - 23, just last 3 quarters they were reduced. Price of cheese has gone up a lot in last 5 yrs. So, food inflation for some of the pdts in the basket is fairly high until late 2023. Why else would the govt scrap import duty on pulses/chickpeas this month? Election move. Again, petrol prices in India (Rs 100+/l) are at least 25% higher than those in the US (Rs 80/l). That may not be inflation as prices in India were always higher than those in USA/OPEC member nations - but it still burdens families in LIG/MIG.
@@agarvipulvegetables and fruits are cheap at the cost of its growers, sellers being pauperized day by day. Of course middle class salaries are increasing( for those who somehow found jobs).
@@user_1abcWhy you are counting only on food products which has gone up? If we but 1 KG of pulses, we will eat that in 1 month. Onions , potato etc which we consume only in 3-4 days ( 1 KG) they are still at price of 2012....If you add 4% inflation every year from 2013 it is 50% increase in price at compounding rate....but still prices are low. It is unfair to count only those products that has gone up. Ukraine war has caused many food products price across country. Why blame Modi for it?
The lies he propogating. Shameless.
Shame on you Bhalla. The world has come to know who you are.
What a creature, my God!!!!????
Pity on Bhalla ,poor old man
For the sake Modi he has gotten so low
Bhalla is a master at obfuscation
This was the worst chat......
You are a great and brave journalist Karan. Big fan from Australia!
Mr Karan Thapar wants to put his agenda in Mr Surjit Bhalla's mouth, that's the crux of this interview.