Acquire 4p Teaching, Play-through, & Round table by Heavy Cardboard

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 жов 2024
  • Are you interested in learning how to play Acquire? Here is your chance! Edward, from Heavy Cardboard, teaches you how to play in this video.
    Later, he is joined by Andrew, & Chris for a full-game play-through. Let us know what you think in the comments below, and don't forget to like and subscribe!
    1:14 Video start
    1:34 Intro
    3:51 Teach
    14:56 Game start
    38:18 Merge
    58:10 Merge
    1:07:56 Merge
    1:21:04 Merge
    1:28:11 Merge
    1:30:19 Merge
    1:36:31 Merge
    1:42:05 Game end triggered (Merge)
    1:45:54 Final scoring
    1:48:54 And the winner is...
    1:49:40 Roundtable
    1:59:43 Outro
    BGG Game Link: boardgamegeek....
    -----------------------------------------------------------------
    Visit our website: www.heavycardbo...
    Support us: pledgehc.com
    BGG Guild: boardgamegeek....
    Patreon: / heavycardboard
    Follow us on Instagram: / heavycardboard
    Follow Heavy Cardboard on Twitter: / heavycardboard
    Like our Facebook page: / heavycardboard
    Listen to the podcast!
    iTunes: geo.itunes.app...
    Google Play feed: play.google.co...
    Want to send us something?
    Heavy Cardboard
    321 Main St.
    Suite 2001
    Wakefield, MA 01880
    streamlabs.com...
    Thanks for watching and remember to comment below with your thoughts & feedback!

КОМЕНТАРІ • 17

  • @manjr
    @manjr 5 років тому +9

    All-time great! In an alternate universe, Acquire is the game every home has in the closet instead of Monopoly. :)

    • @jasonstone5953
      @jasonstone5953 5 років тому

      I totally agree!

    • @KesSharann
      @KesSharann 5 років тому

      Absolutely this.

    • @dr3putt62
      @dr3putt62 4 роки тому

      manjr I have the 3M version to this day. 👍

  • @MadVinnie22
    @MadVinnie22 2 роки тому

    I'm one of those that never really heard of this game, but now I want to go find a copy. Great game with a fun dramatic finish! And you know it's a classic HC stream when there is a Glory-to-Rome directed at someone in the peanut gallery.

  • @TorIverWilhelmsen
    @TorIverWilhelmsen 5 років тому +2

    Placing the merging tile upside-down can help showing that it does not count as any of the companies until after the merger. Kind of how you place the big red thingy on the merging tile in Yellow & Yangtze.

    • @Heavycardboard
      @Heavycardboard  5 років тому

      Oooh good call there! We'll do that going forward. Thanks for the tip, Tor!

  • @emmanuelrodriguez1693
    @emmanuelrodriguez1693 Рік тому +1

    Is this custom made? Or is this a printing? Would love to have this game but it seams OOP

    • @Heavycardboard
      @Heavycardboard  Рік тому

      Nope, not custom. Just an older edition. It's a very old game, but with a plethora of editions available second-hand! Good luck.

  • @davidaldinger3666
    @davidaldinger3666 4 роки тому +1

    Classic old school game. The game gets balanced by the players. If there is an obvious leader, everyone goes after them. Same thing happens in Dune and Cosmic Encounter. It's not always perfect, but then if you lose, play it again.

  • @aweso
    @aweso 5 років тому

    Game looks really cool. Just one quick question, why did Edward go first, it seems to me like 3F is closer to 1A then 9A is, unless I have a different understanding of "closer" than the game does? The obvious thing would be to use the taxicab metric. Edit: But actually, even the standard euclidean metric in this case should have 3F closest, though in other cases you could get different answers between taxicab and euclidean (say 7G vs 12A, 12A is taxicab closer but 7G is euclidean closer). But in general Euclidean either requires some kind of straight edge or at least squaring some numbers where taxicab is just counting, so much easier.

    • @vexingarcanix95
      @vexingarcanix95 5 років тому +1

      It’s as if the board is read like a book, top row first, then second row, etc. That’s why 9A is considered closer to 1A than 3F is.

    • @aweso
      @aweso 5 років тому

      @@vexingarcanix95 Ah, I see, thank you. On the one hand that seems to me to be an odd use of the word "close" but on the other hand it's the easiest to evaluate and unlike either of the ones I suggested there's no possibility for two to be equally close. So I think it's the best way to do it. Sorry for the confusion, I guess I got too fixated on the word "closer"

  • @KevinHoekman
    @KevinHoekman 3 роки тому +2

    Thank you YT for the 2x speed button. Jess at 5 minutes a move is at least tolerable.

  • @acquisitiongames9360
    @acquisitiongames9360 4 роки тому

    Once you learn how to play ACQUIRE then you should learn everything else about the game at www.acquisitiongames.com/

  • @diamondmeeple
    @diamondmeeple 4 роки тому

    The newest version is bad. They changed the rules.

  • @joeysalt8974
    @joeysalt8974 5 років тому +3

    We use paper money every day. But not in board games Cmon get over it use the paper the other figures were confusing.