Why Do Compressed Air Cans Get Cold?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 кві 2019
  • Thanks to brilliant.org/minutephysics for supporting MinutePhysics - get 20% a premium subscription at brilliant.org/minutephysics
    Support MinutePhysics on Patreon! / minutephysics
    Link to Patreon Supporters: www.minutephysics.com/supporters/
    This video is about compressed air cans (aka gas dusters) and why they get cold when you spray them. They cool off because the refrigerant inside (1,1-difluoroethane) is under pressure and boils off when the pressure lowers, and energy lost to the latent heat of vaporization cools the can a lot. Difluoroethane normally boils at -25°C (-13°F), but under ~6 atm (6 bar, 600 kpa) it is a liquid at room temperature. The gas also cools off slightly due to the Joule-Thompson effect of fluid expansion through a throttled valve. Difluoroethane is heavier than air and water soluble, so it is recommended to use it in a ventilated environment to clean your keyboard, etc. Also, 1,1-difluoroethane is a potent greenhouse gas. It is also known as Freon 152a, Ethylidene difluoride, Ethylidene fluoride, HFC-152a, R-152a, and DFE.
    Thanks to Tino and Hannah!
    REFERENCES
    CRC Air Duster Safety Data Sheet
    docs.crcindustries.com/msds/51...
    Latent Heat of vaporization
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latentheat
    1,1-difluoroethane chemical and physical properties
    webbook.nist.gov/cgi/cbook.cg...
    1,1-difluoroethane on wikipedia
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1,1-Dif...
    Free Expansion of Real Gases, Goussard, 1993
    dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.17417
    Joule-Thompson Expansion Course Notes
    tccc.iesl.forth.gr/education/l...
    Properties of 1,1-difluoroethane
    www.inchem.org/documents/sids/...
    pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/comp...
    Medical Effects of difluoroethane
    toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/si...
    MinutePhysics is on twitter - @minutephysics
    And facebook - / minutephysics
    And Google+ (does anyone use this any more?) - bit.ly/qzEwc6
    Minute Physics provides an energetic and entertaining view of old and new problems in physics -- all in a minute!
    Created by Henry Reich
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,3 тис.

  • @pratikwase9970
    @pratikwase9970 5 років тому +2939

    minutephysics: what is quantum tunneling? (1 minute 5 seconds)
    Also minutephysics- Why do compressed air cans get cold?(6 minutes 12 seconds)

    • @rawtrout3402
      @rawtrout3402 4 роки тому +110

      you channot explain what you do not understand

    • @luongmaihunggia
      @luongmaihunggia 4 роки тому +24

      @@rawtrout3402 **cannot*

    • @drew4716
      @drew4716 4 роки тому +95

      @@luongmaihunggia channot*

    • @kyrlics6515
      @kyrlics6515 4 роки тому +45

      @@drew4716 schannot*

    • @bluesteel7874
      @bluesteel7874 4 роки тому +49

      @@kyrlics6515 shallots

  • @skydemon3423
    @skydemon3423 5 років тому +1346

    It's because it's filled with winter air
    you have to replace it with summer air

  • @mashedpotatoesfromkfc
    @mashedpotatoesfromkfc 5 років тому +4981

    Can specifically states: DO NOT SHAKE
    Minutephysics: *continues to shake can*
    Can: AM I A JOKE TO YOU

    • @Lumanova
      @Lumanova 5 років тому +172

      To me, "Do Not Shake" warnings are just begging for you to shake. I would never think to shake a bottle or can unless told not to. When I am, I have to shake it, or else I will die of gay.

    • @ViraMotorko
      @ViraMotorko 5 років тому +54

      Some cans of similar design hold other substances that ought to be shaken. If there are cans that have to be shaken then it's only natural to put corresponding advise on those that don't.

    • @Lumanova
      @Lumanova 5 років тому +14

      @@ViraMotorko Therefore, whether they add the warning or not, people are gonna shake it either way.

    • @shark777538
      @shark777538 5 років тому +47

      Proceeds to shake pressure cooker with boiling water

    • @christopherg2347
      @christopherg2347 5 років тому +17

      He did it for demonstration Purpsoes, knowing exactly *why* it was there and how to avoid any of the negative side effects.
      If anything bad had happened, the producer of the can would have been absolved of any wrongdoing due to the warning label.
      Demonstration and teaching purposes are exactly the case you are allowed to ignore such labels, if you know what you are doing.

  • @GalluZ
    @GalluZ 4 роки тому +167

    Can: *100% ozone safe*
    Also can: *has potent greenhouse gas*
    Balanced, as all everything should be.

    • @aurelia8028
      @aurelia8028 2 роки тому

      stfu

    • @smugfei6682
      @smugfei6682 2 роки тому +16

      Sure, it is a potent greenhouse gas, but it is definitely the lesser of two evils. I doubt an average family of 4 in North America would use more than one can of compressed air per year. Compare that to the huge amount of CO2 that same average family produces from driving, using electricity from a grid that uses fossil fuels, eating food produced 1000s of kilometers away, and buying/ replacing household items it really isn't a huge deal. Moving towards a 100% renewable & nuclear grid (some states and provinces already do/are close to this, British Columbia for example), phasing out gas/diesel vehicles as EV charging stations become as common as gas stations and improving mass transit, more carbon efficient food production worldwide, and making products more easily repairable and longer lasting should be prioritized first.

    • @mexicoball9064
      @mexicoball9064 2 роки тому +5

      @@smugfei6682 i found yanfei in yt comments

    • @jamesdinius7769
      @jamesdinius7769 Рік тому +2

      Greenhouse gases=\= ozone depletion.

    • @The-Devils-Advocate
      @The-Devils-Advocate Рік тому +6

      @@jamesdinius7769 hence the comment

  • @9034833838
    @9034833838 4 роки тому +82

    Highschool: Adiabatic Expanison
    Undergraduate: Joule Thompson Expansion
    Master: Get back to you in 2 years

    • @travcollier
      @travcollier 4 роки тому +26

      So many disciplines are basically...
      101: Learn some cool simple laws
      201 to post graduate: Learn how everything you were taught in 101 is wrong.

    • @anonymeanonyme4047
      @anonymeanonyme4047 2 роки тому

      and now ????????????????????????????????

  • @maheshghorsaine6919
    @maheshghorsaine6919 5 років тому +1600

    Now, we know Kurzgesagt or 3B1B's turn to upload a new video.

    • @ohno5559
      @ohno5559 5 років тому +91

      3b1b's next differential equations video is supposedly coming this week

    • @fattahrambe
      @fattahrambe 5 років тому +48

      Kurzgesagt already upload couple days ago

    • @bored_person
      @bored_person 5 років тому +15

      Didn't they already take their turns?

    • @maheshghorsaine6919
      @maheshghorsaine6919 5 років тому +1

      @@bored_person checked after watching this, they are first I think.

    • @ingoseiler
      @ingoseiler 5 років тому +7

      Kurzgesagt uploaded a video on their German channel today

  • @bugjams
    @bugjams 5 років тому +582

    Spraying the can right-side up: *Contributes to global warming*
    Spraying the can upside down: *Makes instant ice*
    Wumbology!!

    • @jwoodside68
      @jwoodside68 4 роки тому +29

      well, spraying it upside down also contributes to global warming. It's the same reason this chemical when used as a refrigerant is actually illegal to vent into the atmosphere. So why do we use it in a can that can be vented into the atmosphere?
      I have no clue. I guess an HFC (Diflouroethane) is safer than an FC (Propane, Butane, ect.), and better for the environment than a CFC (Evil R12) ?

    • @michaelweiske702
      @michaelweiske702 4 роки тому +9

      @@jwoodside68 wooosh?

    • @legitimate8463
      @legitimate8463 4 роки тому +3

      @@jwoodside68 r/wooosh

    • @manuelsputnik
      @manuelsputnik 4 роки тому +29

      Guys, this is an educational channel. You're being cringy.

    • @navyasharma2750
      @navyasharma2750 4 роки тому +5

      @@manuelsputnik correct

  • @EebstertheGreat
    @EebstertheGreat 5 років тому +51

    Some dusters on the market use actual compressed air, making them generally safer, though the pressure in the cans is usually somewhat higher (~10 bar) and they don't last nearly as long. They won't reach frostbite temperatures (unless the can explodes I guess), but they do still cool down due to adiabatic expansion.

    • @waldolemmer
      @waldolemmer 3 місяці тому

      I drilled a hole in a long brake cleaner can and soldered a Schrader valve to it. I usually give it about 20 pumps, which results in ~10 bar

  • @MichaelSteeves
    @MichaelSteeves 5 років тому +89

    Turning the can upside down is a great way to test for weak points on circuit boards. Intermittent faults tend to show up under thermal stress.

    • @_egg_2933
      @_egg_2933 5 років тому +3

      “Yah, it’s Rewind time!”

    • @johnm5928
      @johnm5928 5 років тому +51

      Its also a great way to cause one.

    • @AsifAAli
      @AsifAAli 4 місяці тому

      You want their circuit board to short? Nice try, you evil lithium cell!

  • @shunyat9023
    @shunyat9023 5 років тому +41

    I don't know what to do with this information but I'm glad that I heard it anyway.

  • @Dulus0
    @Dulus0 5 років тому +210

    Seems strange, at least for last ~8 years, nearly all gas dusters i bought was basically a proban-butan mix. Much better for the ozone layer, but also highly flammable :D.
    And a few of them were R134a ( Tetrafluoroethane is what wiki says is the chemical name).

    • @bobthegoat7090
      @bobthegoat7090 5 років тому +21

      At least the principle is the same so you didn't waste any time watching this video

    • @Markle2k
      @Markle2k 5 років тому +3

      R134a has about 10 times the GWP of 1,1 difluoroethane (1430 vs. 140)
      edit:wrong number of fluoros

    • @Dulus0
      @Dulus0 5 років тому +4

      @@Markle2k yes R134a is also a potent green house gas, but as I said majority of cans I bought are propan-butan mix, only a few were R134a, and those were typically bought for some industrial locations, where I guess it was because of the non-flammability.

    • @985476246845
      @985476246845 5 років тому +1

      I have proban-butan mix in my house, bought a few months ago. does not have a pleasant smell.

    • @jwoodside68
      @jwoodside68 4 роки тому

      Yes, 134A is common. I was about to mention car air conditioning in another comment but googled the chemical before making sure this was the right chemical. Not sure why so many refrigerants are used, or any at all really. but Propane and Butane are just a really bad idea.

  • @TeamTwiistz
    @TeamTwiistz 5 років тому +50

    Finally the hard hitting questions

  • @clu83
    @clu83 5 років тому +265

    Boo! This video is clearly longer than a minute, I demand my money back!
    Oh, wait...
    Carry on!

    • @error.418
      @error.418 5 років тому +7

      his videos are on the order of magnitude of minutes instead of hours of lecture, he's made videos explaining this because people have made this lame joke for years now

    • @carazy123_
      @carazy123_ 3 роки тому +1

      Username I believe the joke they made wasn’t actually about the length of the video, but rather the fact that it is free!

  • @TreeHairedGingerAle
    @TreeHairedGingerAle 5 років тому +1083

    T_T *"Also a very potent greenhouse gas"* Why we do dis?????????

    • @GRBtutorials
      @GRBtutorials 5 років тому +158

      At least it doesn’t deplete the ozone layer like CFCs did. Though I don’t know why they don’t just compress air inside the can, as that would also be a lot cheaper.
      EDIT: turns out it’s because it’s more dense and the pressure stays constant, and isn’t flammable like propane or butane.

    • @ShadowDrakken
      @ShadowDrakken 5 років тому +35

      "we" don't, I use a hurricane electric blower instead of compressed gas :)

    • @gavinkemp7920
      @gavinkemp7920 5 років тому +50

      @@GRBtutorials just to clarify a bit the reason we don't use compressed air is their is no conceivable way we could have a significant quantities of air in a aluminium can. So we need something that can liquify.
      On the other hand we use butane in europe. It not that dangerous we are not using tons.

    • @Undy1
      @Undy1 5 років тому +56

      @@gavinkemp7920 Yeah Europe here, I only ever saw compressed "air" with a mixture of propane and butane, never with 1,1-difluoroethane.
      The key difference is that propane is flammable (not an issue really) and that it boils at -42°C instead of -25°C so it has the potential to get much cooler during operation.
      Generally "air in a can" is a terrible product - the can gets incredibly cold (to the point of risk of getting a frostbite) and the colder it gets, the weaker it blows (it's not very strong to begin with, but at low temperatures it gets even worse - you can literally blow harder with your mouth. It really sucks if you need to clean a computer - you probably won't be able to do it in one go.
      And finally it doesn't last very long - it's better to invest in an dedicated electric blower (cheaper but single purpose) or a legit compressor (more expensive but has many other uses including pumping tires and driving a whole variety of pneumatic tools) than continue to buy more and more cans of propane.
      It's more expensive up front than canned air, but it's worth it because it will blow MUCH stronger and more importantly - indefinitely, so it will pay for itself eventually.

    • @kuro13wolf
      @kuro13wolf 5 років тому +16

      @@ShadowDrakken Yeah we should just purchase and install a hurricane electric blower to clean our keyboards like once a month real practical.

  • @EEVblog
    @EEVblog 5 років тому +35

    We need an upside down compressed air vs freezer spray physics shootout...

    • @1boobtube
      @1boobtube 5 років тому

      Dave, I never looked at the ingredients label I assume the cold ones just have a dip tube inside like a liquid co2 tank for an environmental chamber? Don't push the button, tear it apaaaart.

  • @Ryukachoo
    @Ryukachoo 5 років тому +108

    Oh damn, early for minute physics slowly getting funnier and increasing in production and editing quality.
    Also, these cans upside down are NO JOKE, you can get minor surface Frost burns after only a few seconds. Kids blast each other with these as a prank but.....yikes
    However this can be used for things like getting dents out of plastic bumpers since it's intense targeted cold

    • @kamalhm-dev
      @kamalhm-dev 5 років тому +2

      wait what, how does that works?

    • @sakurahonda9245
      @sakurahonda9245 5 років тому +7

      When I sprayed one of things, it still sprayed liquid even though it was upright and I did not shake it. Not good when cleaning your computer.

    • @jamesmnguyen
      @jamesmnguyen 5 років тому +6

      Funny story: I accidently dropped a hairspray can on its nozzle and broke it, causing all the contents to spray continueously. After sometime of freaking out trying to contain the mess. The can was really hard to hold because it was so cold. I couldn't hold it for more than 5 seconds. (I ended up tossing the whole can in the bin, not sure if that was safe or not)

    • @1boobtube
      @1boobtube 5 років тому +4

      @@jamesmnguyen hair spray cans also double as flame throwers. ...

    • @jamesmnguyen
      @jamesmnguyen 5 років тому +2

      @@1boobtube I was more concerned with inhaling too much chemicals.

  • @viliphied
    @viliphied 4 роки тому +6

    This is also how most modern air conditioners work, though they force the coolant through a closed loop so it gets re-compressed into a liquid rather than going out into the atmosphere. Doing that generates waste heat though which is why they have those big outdoor fans. It’s also why you can’t cool your house by leaving the fridge or freezer open, as the waste heat from compressing the coolant stays in your house. If you were to put the back of your fridge outdoors however... (it would still be remarkably inefficient)

  • @polka7970
    @polka7970 5 років тому +9

    It's great in small amounts to freeze wasps that fly out of a nest, freezes the wings so they can only slowly meander towards you on itty bitty legs

  • @animungo
    @animungo 5 років тому +2

    Thank you so much. I was looking for a good explanation of this effect on UA-cam a short while back but could not find any video that explained it this thoroughly.

  • @bongobliss5795
    @bongobliss5795 5 років тому +30

    U cant imagine my happiness when u post a new video

  • @darkhoodchief
    @darkhoodchief 5 років тому +631

    Why do people use a potent greenhouse gas as a compressed air blower?

    • @nealsterling8151
      @nealsterling8151 5 років тому +88

      Because they're stupid.

    • @geilkindfanful
      @geilkindfanful 5 років тому +317

      Because it works good

    • @akilw.3360
      @akilw.3360 5 років тому +409

      They want to counteract global warming by making cold air.

    • @geilkindfanful
      @geilkindfanful 5 років тому +24

      @@akilw.3360 xD

    • @MarioFanGamer659
      @MarioFanGamer659 5 років тому +96

      That's because halocarbons have got many useful features (like easily compressionable) which is why they used to were pretty common, though their nasty side effects were found out later (greenhouse effect aside, it's also because they're poisonous and destroy ozone like the infamous CFC).

  • @DyslexicMitochondria
    @DyslexicMitochondria 5 років тому +34

    Your videos are so amazing. Informative as well as entertaining. You, sir, are the inspiration behind my channel. Keep up the great work!

  • @naswinger
    @naswinger 5 років тому +23

    you actually blew the crumbs into the keyboard at the beginning :(

  • @alexkorinth6459
    @alexkorinth6459 Рік тому

    Just learned about the Joule-Thompson phenomenon in one of my senior engineering classes, and I'm pumped to see it talked about, even briefly.

  • @kurtlautenshlager4878
    @kurtlautenshlager4878 5 років тому +3

    I appreciate that the walking bassline always resolves right at the end of the video

  • @ha7vds
    @ha7vds 3 роки тому +7

    the great brian brushwood taught me that a can of air can be used to shatter a lock. now i know why it works. thank you

  • @bradleyunderhill6449
    @bradleyunderhill6449 5 років тому +1

    Great video, very interesting. Keep up the good work.

  • @kevingruenofficial
    @kevingruenofficial 4 роки тому +1

    😮 evaporative cooling. This channel rocks! Awesome elegant and simple explanations as should be. thank you!

  • @shashankambone6920
    @shashankambone6920 5 років тому +3

    This was an interesting video. It's been a while since I've been satisfied from minute physics.

  • @thekrackenx
    @thekrackenx 4 роки тому +6

    4:12
    When my mom says don't touch that

  • @evasuser
    @evasuser 5 років тому +1

    A superb video, almost a physics lecture, ty m8 and keep uploading.

  • @vipparthihemalatha753
    @vipparthihemalatha753 3 роки тому

    Your explanations are very clear. Giving a like to each of your videos and subscribing to your channel is not even enough

  • @MatthijsvanDuin
    @MatthijsvanDuin 5 років тому +8

    3:30 Also, a reflective surface has reduced emission of thermal radiation*.
    * since any light reflected is not absorbed, and the emissivity at any given wavelength equals the absorptivity at the same wavelength (Kirchhoff's law)

  • @ogi22
    @ogi22 5 років тому +9

    Beautiful clip, i would add just 2 things:
    1. It's not only Difluoroethane, it's a mixture of chemicals of similar properties. They mix them together to achieve desired boiling points of the gas mixture. I think Cody's Lab had a very nice clip about it.
    2. It is HIGHLY FLAMMABLE!!!! Never use it around a heat source. I had a small accident when we tried to remove a stuck bearing... i bought a few canisters of "compressed air" because i knew how cool they can get. I was heating up the bearing from one side using a heat gun and my coworker was spraying liquid "air" on the shaft from the other side... The result was a big ball of fire and a great hair loss of my coworker (i had a cap on my head) ;) I'm so happy it all ended up only with company jokes :D

  • @fernfractal
    @fernfractal 3 роки тому

    my favorite moments:
    - the inconspicuous tape job on the bottom of the air canister
    - the man w/ the quick reflexes ducking both of his hands as the axe locks into earth

  • @sciencebug314
    @sciencebug314 5 років тому

    i always wondered about this. thank you!!

  • @wolfmobile3693
    @wolfmobile3693 5 років тому +9

    If you let some air out of a duster and put the can up against your ear before it gets too cold, you can hear the liquid boiling into a gas.

  • @athulj9614
    @athulj9614 5 років тому +15

    can find more about this in the book
    THERMODYNAMICS AN ENGINEERING APPROACH 8th edition by cengel
    pg 116

    • @pedrovaz8150
      @pedrovaz8150 3 роки тому

      hi, where can i get that book for free?

  • @JayFolipurba
    @JayFolipurba 5 років тому

    Thank you! I was wondering about this for way too long

  • @Ephemeral_Inspiration
    @Ephemeral_Inspiration 5 років тому +1

    Was literally just wondering this the other day. Perfect!

  • @Nuovoswiss
    @Nuovoswiss 5 років тому +5

    This was a great explanation of the Joule-Thompson effect and how it relates to adiabatic cooling. The JT effect is something specific to nozzles, and depends on their geometries and the pressure gradient, while adiabatic heating/cooling is the more general case for gas expansion. I've seen many people incorrectly refer to the JT effect and assume that some gasses will always heat up when they expand.

    • @the1exnay
      @the1exnay 5 років тому

      Nuovoswiss
      If you understand it would you mind sharing- because i watched the video then looked it up and i still have no clue. Why does it matter that in the process of expanding it went through a nozzle, don't most thermodynamic equations just bother with the start and end states? Where does the extra heat come from without breaking the laws of thermodynamics (especially given the fluid is doing extra work to accelerate itself through the nozzle so you'd expect extra cooling- not heating- if anything)? If we measure the thermal energy of the whole system from after using a nozzle or cutting off the top would there actually be a difference in total thermal energy of the system between the two processes?

    • @Nuovoswiss
      @Nuovoswiss 5 років тому

      @@the1exnay Sure thing. At the entrance to the nozzle, the gas is compressed even further since it is being squeezed through an orifice, creating a local hot spot. The energy to do that comes from the heat/pressure of the rest of the gas in the high-pressure container. Away from the nozzle, in the bulk of the pressure vessel, the gas cools adiabatically, as expected. When the gas squeezed through the nozzle expands upon exiting, it also cools adiabatically, but whether that cooling is greater or less than the nozzle heating depends on the details (∆T, ∆P, M, geometry, etc).
      Thermodynamically, it's like you have some of your pressurized gas expand adiabatically into a small cylinder with a check valve, then compressed that second chamber using a spring to capture the piston's inertia (this is an inertially-driven phenomenon) to heat it up before letting it expand adiabatically once again. The local heating is driven by the expansion of the full volume of gas, but that energy gets dumped locally to the gas going through the nozzle. Does that answer your questions?

    • @the1exnay
      @the1exnay 5 років тому +1

      Nuovoswiss
      It makes more sense now. So it's a process by which the air leaving takes thermal energy from the air being left behind. And the total thermal energy is the same at the end for either process, there's just a change in the temperature differential between inside and outside the can?
      And this heating is just pressure becoming the mechanical energy of moving air which turns into thermal energy via friction and air resistance?
      I think i might understand it better now, thanks for taking the time to explain.

    • @Nuovoswiss
      @Nuovoswiss 5 років тому

      @@the1exnay That right, for the most part, in practice. The only issue I see is that you're thinking of 'thermal energy' as an independent quantity. If you want to go down the rabbit hole, there is the thermodynamic condition known as 'free expansion', in which any gas can expand with no net ∆T. This does not violate any precept of thermodynamics, but in practice it would require something like a Maxwell Demon, but without any discriminatory capability (and thus, no violation of thermodynamics).
      Adiabatic expansion (and thus adiabatic cooling) fundamentally assumes that the energy cost to ∆T comes from some work done. If a gas expands without expending any energy to an outside system, no work is done, so it can't change its temperature.
      What this means for a nozzle is that if the gas goes through it with no opposition (ie, with nothing to push against, even itself) then it will come out the same temperature it started as, when averaged over all its atoms/molecules.

    • @the1exnay
      @the1exnay 5 років тому +1

      Nuovoswiss
      Huh, that's really interesting. So in adiabatic expansion it's the work on the environment normally just compressing the air around it or?

  • @gursharanmarwaha3376
    @gursharanmarwaha3376 5 років тому +42

    When you go to the DOLLAR store, you spend $6.
    When you watch MINUTEphysics, you watch for 6 minutes.

    • @error.418
      @error.418 5 років тому +12

      his videos are on the order of magnitude of minutes instead of hours of lecture, he's made videos explaining this because people have made this lame joke for years now. it doesn't say "one-minute physics."

  • @savo4ek228
    @savo4ek228 5 років тому +1

    This is great! I always knew it was about gas expansion, but turns out it a bit more complicated than just that, thanks

  • @penrar
    @penrar 5 років тому

    Always wondered about these, thanks!

  • @LaunchPadAstronomy
    @LaunchPadAstronomy 5 років тому +3

    Excellent explanation. And thanks for pointing out the fact that it’s a potent greenhouse gas to boot.

  • @vodkainglassofstalinium1221
    @vodkainglassofstalinium1221 5 років тому +61

    Some day this guy's videos will save me in my physics paper

    • @gustavogonzalez8648
      @gustavogonzalez8648 5 років тому +3

      No, no it wont

    • @leocurious9919
      @leocurious9919 5 років тому +1

      If that is supposed to save you.... I really hope you fail.

    • @jwoodside68
      @jwoodside68 4 роки тому

      No, it wont. they very basically cover concepts. If I wanted to grade a paper on HFC's and you never touched on Pressure/Temperature relationships I would have failed you.

    • @nickolasdiamond5619
      @nickolasdiamond5619 4 роки тому +1

      Everyone in the reply section: r/wooosh

  • @samiulhaquerounok5787
    @samiulhaquerounok5787 2 роки тому

    The concept taught is splendid ❤❤❤

  • @susahosh
    @susahosh 5 років тому +1

    1:45 - The warning label is telling you not to shake the can...*goes on to shake the can* LOL

  • @SethCWhelchel
    @SethCWhelchel 5 років тому +6

    I always assumed there was some sort of endothermic reaction happening, (especially since I could hear fizzing in the can whenever I used it a lot), but I never considered that the gas wasn't actually air

  • @Benedict416
    @Benedict416 5 років тому +11

    1:17 Is that why when we say "Hooo~" cold air comes out and when we say "Haaa~" hot air comes out?
    I think you have just answered 2 question I was always curious about in 1 video

    • @bbgun061
      @bbgun061 5 років тому +5

      no, the faster stream of air from saying 'hooo' cools your hand faster, so it feels colder.

    • @Owen_loves_Butters
      @Owen_loves_Butters 7 місяців тому

      @@bbgun061Even if the air stream is slower, it still feels colder.

  • @adampetten1009
    @adampetten1009 5 років тому +1

    Keep doing videos like this, I was hoping for a video on joules tompson effect.

  • @Faith276
    @Faith276 5 років тому

    I really enjoyed this video!! We learnt about thermodynamics in school last year, so my understanding of why it cooled was the first explanation (which you proved wrong). But it's really interesting to know the real reason!

  • @manamejeffbeezos1238
    @manamejeffbeezos1238 5 років тому +7

    Dude now I wanna watch a see through compressed air can in slow Mo

  • @ToxicityAssured
    @ToxicityAssured 5 років тому +4

    I agree mostly. The boiling liquid does cool itself and the can. Around 3:00 minutes it's implied that the heat needed to do this comes from somewhere. It's true that more energy can cause a fluid to boil or lowering the pressure works as well. I don't think that's really a good explanation though. Maybe something like this?
    A drop in pressure occurs. This decreases the pressure/boiling point and the fluid boils. The most energetic molecules evaporate at a higher rate. Temperature is just the average kinetic energy. If we remove the higher speed molecules leaving the slower ones on average, the temperature drops. Now we have a cooling liquid and heat external to the can can flow to the cool can. The valve closes and pressure builds as external heat from the environment flows into the can. Eventually the vapor pressure is reached and boiling stops. Things are now the same temperature everywhere. Your can is "recharged".
    I wonder the differences between full and near empty cans... A larger area of gas compared to liquid (nearly empty can) will need longer to increase the pressure in the larger gas filled area. I think full cans "recharge" faster maybe.

    • @johnm5928
      @johnm5928 5 років тому +1

      Yep, as usual, minutephysics gets something wrong. Agree with your better explanation.
      As far as recharging when the liquid is low, I would be interested to find out. But one thing I can think of - the smaller amount of liquid is a smaller thermal mass, and therefore would absorb ambient energy faster and therefore regain its pressure faster (i.e., your hand holding the can will heat it up faster with less liquid in the can). Idk, just spitballing.

    • @ToxicityAssured
      @ToxicityAssured 5 років тому

      @@johnm5928 Excellent point, I think you're right. Thanks for commenting.

    • @Owen_loves_Butters
      @Owen_loves_Butters Рік тому

      It's not just that the high energy molecules are escaping lowering the average temperature. The process of vaporization is endothermic, as it involves breaking intermolecular bonds (just like how it takes an input of energy to separate magnets).

  • @nolanwestrich2602
    @nolanwestrich2602 5 років тому

    Quite a thorough explanation.

  • @entheo302
    @entheo302 5 років тому

    I was just wondering this and then this video came up it my feed. Thanks.

  • @nameless_monster_
    @nameless_monster_ 3 роки тому +3

    Bottle : do not shake
    *six minutes physics : * I 'll pretend that I didn't see that

  • @matchstickgameplay
    @matchstickgameplay 5 років тому +44

    I see minute physics, I click. It's that simple.

    • @ContraHacker1337
      @ContraHacker1337 5 років тому +4

      And then you click like. Don't forget that.

  • @strawhats28
    @strawhats28 5 років тому

    Physical chemistry might be the topic i loved to study the most at the university : thermodynamics, phases equilibrium, etc fascinating !

  • @benjaminsehic5190
    @benjaminsehic5190 5 років тому

    These longer videos are really nice :)

  • @MyOwnUrl
    @MyOwnUrl 5 років тому +3

    3:45 Rip HP users ☹

  • @MrNight713
    @MrNight713 3 роки тому +3

    I’ve always wondered this because at my work we use CO2 cartridges to flush pvc pipes and after we’re done they usually freeze up

  • @jasonlameyjkl
    @jasonlameyjkl 5 років тому

    This was infinitely more interesting than I thought it was gonna be. Great vid.

  • @kexcz8276
    @kexcz8276 4 роки тому

    Nice!I knew it even before i watched this video :3.And i like very much your style of videos ...GJ!

  • @3X3Beastsu
    @3X3Beastsu 5 років тому +5

    Am I the only one who's watching this instead of studying...?

  • @DWhite-hg5hp
    @DWhite-hg5hp 4 роки тому +3

    It's also highly flammable. Set a toilet bowl on fire by dumping a coke bottles worth of the stuff into the bowl, followed by a match.
    It also felt like I was breathing razor blades afterwards so, not worth it.

  • @TheScienceBiome
    @TheScienceBiome 5 років тому +1

    *Cool* video, Henry!

  • @YouTubeWhitet
    @YouTubeWhitet 5 років тому

    I like these quick physics videos!

  • @Cosmic_Ray_
    @Cosmic_Ray_ 5 років тому +6

    Minor Avengers: Endgame Spolier
    About 1 year ago, you did a video on different types of fictional time travel. In the movie Avengers: Endgame, there is time travel that is a bit confusing, so can you do a solo video on this movie or a update video on fictional time travel with this included?

  • @sukhrajsingh466
    @sukhrajsingh466 5 років тому +6

    it's also a potent greenhouse gas

    • @JosiahMcCarthy
      @JosiahMcCarthy 5 років тому

      Oof

    • @heckler73
      @heckler73 5 років тому

      Why?

    • @jadoei13
      @jadoei13 5 років тому

      @@heckler73 I know this might not answer your entire question but it has a gwp rating of 124. So releasing 1kg of this should be equal to releasing 124kg of CO2 as far as I understand it.
      Wiki: Global warming potential (GWP) is a measure of how much heat a greenhouse gas traps in the atmosphere up to a specific time horizon, relative to carbon dioxide. It compares the amount of heat trapped by a certain mass of the gas in question to the amount of heat trapped by a similar mass of carbon dioxide and is expressed as a factor of carbon dioxide (whose GWP is standardized to 1).

    • @cullenl2508
      @cullenl2508 5 років тому

      @@jadoei13 actually according to the government it's 1300 times more potent

    • @heckler73
      @heckler73 5 років тому

      @@jadoei13 So it hinges on the necessity of the "greenhouse effect" hypothesis being valid. That's pretty well what I expected but wasn't sure. Thanks.

  • @theseamusexperience
    @theseamusexperience 5 років тому

    Fun video! I like these quick physics videos

  • @peterandersson3812
    @peterandersson3812 5 років тому

    Videos in this channel are always awesome, but this may be one of the awsomest ever. And one can watch it without pausing to think, which you needed to do with the (excellent!) series about relativity.

  • @ChristianJeremyOcaya
    @ChristianJeremyOcaya 5 років тому +4

    It seems that you've been watching bon appetit
    Claire's question from the Gourmet Reese's Cup episode

  • @robmckennie4203
    @robmckennie4203 5 років тому +5

    this is also how air conditioners and refrigerators work, it's not a coincidence 1,1-difluoroethane is also used in those applications

    • @jacobras
      @jacobras 5 років тому +3

      Does this mean I should stop shaking my refrigerator?

    • @nicholaslau3194
      @nicholaslau3194 5 років тому +1

      Well, being a refrigerant isn't exactly why it is used for "compressed air". In refrigeration applications, the low boiling point is needed for cooling (obviously), but for "compressed air", all that is needed is the constant high pressure. Cooling of the can is not an intended feature, but an unwanted side effect.

    • @robmckennie4203
      @robmckennie4203 5 років тому

      @@nicholaslau3194 i mean, that's true, but i never said that the cooling was a designed feature of compressed air cans? the video explains why they get cold, and i said that the physical effect that makes them cold is the same one used in refrigeration

  • @Krishnakishorenori
    @Krishnakishorenori 2 роки тому

    very nicely explained.

  • @EighteenCharacters
    @EighteenCharacters 5 років тому

    I legit wondered about all of this. Thanks!

  • @philipberthiaume2314
    @philipberthiaume2314 5 років тому +9

    This is the same concept that A/C works on, compression and de-compression cycling.

    • @Crlarl
      @Crlarl 5 років тому +4

      Which is why the same refrigerants are used in both.

  • @jerry3790
    @jerry3790 5 років тому +6

    If I let out all the information that was compressed into this video, what temperature will it cool to?

    • @strangehappenings8961
      @strangehappenings8961 5 років тому

      Approximately the temperature of your mom. Hahaha 😂

    • @Lysergic_
      @Lysergic_ 5 років тому +2

      @@strangehappenings8961 good one buddy

    • @renakunisaki
      @renakunisaki 5 років тому

      What's the boiling point of liquid information?

  • @Zyndell
    @Zyndell 5 років тому +1

    Interesting video. Could you consider doing one on the Joule-Thomson effect and the inversion temperature? Also a very interesting topic!

    • @NuclearSavety
      @NuclearSavety 5 років тому

      ... and then do it right that time, not as wrong as in this video ...

  • @almightyrobbie123
    @almightyrobbie123 5 років тому

    I spray things for a job and never knew the answer to this! Thanks! Seems so obvious when you put it like that!

  • @apkoiv5795
    @apkoiv5795 5 років тому +3

    Because PV = nRT. You lower the pressure, we lower the temperature.

    • @IronLotus15
      @IronLotus15 5 років тому +2

      Not quite. V also increases quite a bit, you have to account for that too. What explains the full effect is a combination of what you said with PV=nRT, the volume expanding, and the energy from the phase change as explained in the video. And of those three I believe the phase change has the greatest impact on the temperature.

  • @android199ios25
    @android199ios25 5 років тому +6

    Explain dislikes coz I cant. BTW helium gets hotter due to JT expansion at room temp.

  • @KhoaNguyen-rk9dz
    @KhoaNguyen-rk9dz 4 роки тому

    very great explaination!

  • @proxy1035
    @proxy1035 4 роки тому +1

    i've never seen such a fancy compressed air can... that valve thingy is huge

  • @exploding_pineapples
    @exploding_pineapples 5 років тому +5

    I didn't know that these air cans could be so interesting

  • @sachi813
    @sachi813 5 років тому +7

    Try blowing air through your mouth by yawning style and by pouting your mouth and feel the air from both on your hand ...to feel the temperature difference.

    • @the_original_Bilb_Ono
      @the_original_Bilb_Ono 5 років тому +2

      Wouldn't the difference be much more to do with the heat from your hand being pushed off by the fast blowing air? If you slowly let the air out your mouth it feels the same temperature no matter the orientation of your lips.

    • @ipsojure2137
      @ipsojure2137 5 років тому +3

      I highly doubt that you can actually create a noticeable pressure difference with your mouth

  • @adityamohan1773
    @adityamohan1773 4 роки тому

    Thanks for answering something I've asked always

  • @BadAssEngineering
    @BadAssEngineering 4 роки тому +1

    Same effect happens in Cars/Trucks converted to run on LP Propane. The Propane is liquid inside the tank, and it has to be routed to a heat exchanger to heat it up before the engine, because it freezes and clogs parts of it

  • @inzanozulu
    @inzanozulu 5 років тому +27

    Somebody send this to Claire from BonAppetit

    • @annascaligiuri
      @annascaligiuri 5 років тому +3

      inzanozulu I was just thinking the same thing.

    • @dgo792
      @dgo792 5 років тому +1

      Thank you

    • @consultingmoose
      @consultingmoose 5 років тому +2

      lolol i was looking for someone to say this 😂

  • @AlessioSangalli
    @AlessioSangalli 5 років тому +3

    What is the sense of the numerous notes that only stay visible for a fraction of a second? It's so frustrating

  • @pritamsarkar2385
    @pritamsarkar2385 2 роки тому

    very good explanation.... thankyou

  • @Dicefinity
    @Dicefinity 5 років тому +1

    After months of your videos I can now follow through without rewind :)

    • @christyhorak2950
      @christyhorak2950 5 років тому +1

      Yash Bhartia so there is hope for me hahaha 😂

  • @jakeenders7
    @jakeenders7 5 років тому +7

    You put CRUMBS on an APPLE piece of shi.. keyboard?!? Good luck m9.

  • @user-nq6wm1um8f
    @user-nq6wm1um8f 5 років тому +3

    Where are those cats😆😆😆
    I really miss them

  • @MirceaKitsune
    @MirceaKitsune 5 років тому

    Never used compressed air cans, but totally familiar with the weird cooling from gas deodorant cans. I always speculated it's the same effect used by air conditioning systems.

  • @ratdude747
    @ratdude747 5 років тому +1

    Two things:
    1. The stuff in said cans is similar to (if not the exact same thing) as R134a refrigerant. (What's used in car AC systems, other than a select few new models). Hence how R134a can be sold to consumers (and other refrigerants are generally not).
    2. The principle that was described here is also how such an AC system works... only with it being a closed system and with a compressor to re-liquify the expanded refrigerant, and a condenser coil to vent off heat (how heat is "expelled" by the system). The rest of the system (expansion valve/orifice tube and evap coil) are the same idea...

  • @xnamkcor
    @xnamkcor 5 років тому +6

    You guys didn't mention global warming. What am I supposed to do with these shots now?

  • @electronicsNmore
    @electronicsNmore 5 років тому +3

    They aren't real "Air" cans. Almost all these air cans, including the CRC you're holding, use refrigerant to create pressure. Pressing the button down allows pressure inside the can to escape. When the pressure above the liquid refrigerant is lowered, the refrigerant will boil to increase the pressure until it's high enough to keep the refrigerant from boiling(or turning into a gas). As the liquid refrigerant boils(going from a high pressure to a low pressure), it gets cold, just like the refrigerant in your vehicle or home A/C system. Great video, and well explained as usual!

  • @The_Normalised_Cyclist
    @The_Normalised_Cyclist 5 років тому

    Yup thanks Henry, used the code from las video. Been doing a bit brilliant but never have enough time to get lots done. I hope to finish all courses from science throughout this one year subscription 🙈

  • @baldevrajdhiman4914
    @baldevrajdhiman4914 3 роки тому

    Fantastically explained