Entering Azhar: What you should know in Aqeedah | Essential Aqeedah Knowledge Before Entering Azhar
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 сер 2024
- Entering Azhar: What you should know in Aqeedah | Essential Aqeedah Knowledge Before Entering Azhar
A continuation of the "Entering Azhar" series to help students prepare for their journey at Azhar. In this video, I discuss some of the key books that a student should study before entering Azhar. The official Azhari Aqeedah is Ashari, so it's crucial for students to be well-grounded in the Aqeedah of the Salaf before entering an environment that teaches the Aqeedah of the people of Bida'h.
I also provide tips on how to navigate these classes and avoid them as much as possible. It's important to remember that no author is perfect, and some of the books mentioned have minor errors. Therefore, it's essential to have a trusted Sheikh to guide you, as a book can never replace the wisdom and guidance of a Sheikh.
Books Mentioned:
العقيدة الواسطية لابن تيمية
شرح العقيدة الواسطية لابن عثيمين
العقود الذهبية لسلطان العميري
التدميرية لابن تيمية
الفتاوى الحموية الكبرى لابن تيمية
شرح السفارانية لابن عثيمين
العقيدة في ضوء القران والسنة لعمر الاشقر
المنة لياسر برهامي
Support My Work: If you find this content valuable and would like to support my work, consider becoming a patron on Patreon. Your support helps me continue creating educational content.
Patreon Link: patreon.com/DaudBurke
Entering Azhar
Aqeedah Knowledge
Islamic Studies
Salaf Aqeedah
Ashari Aqeedah
Preparing for Azhar
Aqeedah Books
Islamic Education
Ibn Taymiyyah
Ibn Uthaymeen
Azhari Students
Islamic Theology
Navigating Azhar
Salafi Aqeedah
Hashtags:
#EnteringAzhar #Aqeedah #IslamicStudies #AzharUniversity #Salafi #Ashari #IslamicEducation #AqeedahBooks #IbnTaymiyyah #IbnUthaymeen #PatreonSupport
May Allah reward you and make all your efforts in the balance of your good deeds
Masha Allah brother I'm so proud you've found the authentic Sunnah( salafi/athari manhaj) may Allah bless you and keep you steadfast
Thanks, And you as well Ameen
بارك الله فيك! الله يثبتك ويقويك.
جزاك الله خيرا
Bro you are truly an academic deeply rooted in Quran & Sunnah as understood by sahaba and those who followed their footsteps. May Allah raise your rank in this world & the hereafter.
I have compiled the best lessons on each book you mentioned:
1. Al-Aqidah al-Wasitiyyah
Sheikh Yusuf al-Ghafees
ua-cam.com/play/PLcm8QRf2RVewTmAVIgxcTRUSliAJiqEnZ.html&si=5Mf6VMbZzj1VtWwR
Sheikh Abu Malik al-Talbanti
ua-cam.com/play/PLlkm09RFRrcKdVl7Z1WiQBOWMsuXeHOxD.html&si=jWaa7Mk4kbs30m55
Sheikh Sultan al-Umayri
ua-cam.com/play/PLWzzF688g_nhVI31BxVQew3wz2WK__mQa.html&si=8XloL4Mdd9YU9Xfs
Authored explanation's:
• شرح العقيدة الواسطية ـ الشيخ ابن عثيمين
• التنبيهات السنية على العقيدة الواسطية - الشيخ عبد العزيز الناصر الرشيد
• شرح العقيدة الواسطية من كلام شيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية - الشيخ خالد المصلح
لروضة الندية شرح العقيدة الواسطية - زيد آل فياض
• توضيح مقاصد العقيدة الواسطية ـ الشيخ عبد الرحمن البراك
• شرح العقيدة الواسطية للعلامة - محمد بن خليل هراس
• شرح شرح العقيدة الواسطية - الشيخ محمد أمان الجامي
2. Al-Hamawiyyah al-Kubra
Sheikh Saleh al-Sindhi
ua-cam.com/play/PLVw9FtCy781akDGcKJym9W_P6Oy2EHvjc.html&si=u60eqFkQZMUCnPWZ
Sheikh Abu Malik al-Talbanti
ua-cam.com/play/PLlkm09RFRrcKtuEoEMvU4qzDGjMpbTgsK.html&si=YKRiEjfeva87WuxB
Sheikh Yusuf al-Ghafees
ua-cam.com/play/PLcm8QRf2RVewoEDGmIRRj5lfuumcAY6yP.html&si=XdvUvWMTL5_N9v4W
Authored explanation's:
• شرح الفتوى الحموية الكبرى - الشيخ أحمد آل عبداللطيف
التحفة السنية في بيان مقاصد الفتوى الحموية - الشيخ محمد بن عبدالرحمن الخميس
• شرح فتح رب البرية بتلخيص الحموية - الشيخ العثيمين
• شرح الفتوى الحموية الكبرى - الشيخ محمد امان الجامي
• شرح الفتاوى الحموية الكبرى ـ الشيخ صالح آل الشيخ
3. Ar-Risalah al-Tadmuriyyah
Sheikh Abdul Aziz Abdul Latif
ua-cam.com/play/PLeFDsF6pAM5hc4DHIomR4HrNiohq4gPrI.html&si=6k81QyF6K6rRYAjX
Sheikh Abdullah al-Ujayri
ua-cam.com/play/PLWBPZQ2b1HlSRsk6nOtQQd8X4csnQonWi.html&si=HTeQO9Pq6yLiAsfM
Sheikh Yusuf al-Ghafees
ua-cam.com/play/PLcm8QRf2RVeyeT_qOxVsQ25wHY0RsZ_ow.html&si=0O4vV8h_miFFZ_7x
Authored explanation's:
• مقاصد التدمرية - الشيخ عبدالله صالح العجيري
• الانتصار للتدمرية - ماهر أمير
• التوضيحات الأثرية لمتن الرسالة التدمرية - الشيخ فخر الدين بن الزبير المحسي
• شرح العقيدة التدمرية - الشيخ العثيمين
• شرح العقيدة التدمرية - الشيخ محمد أمان الجامي
• التحفة المهدية شرح الرسالة التدمرية - الشيخ فالح آل مهدي
• شرح الرسالة التدمرية - لشيخ أحمد آل عبداللطيف
• التعليق على الرسالة التدمرية - لشيخ عبد العزيز عبد اللطيف
• شرح العقيدة التدمرية ـ الشيخ عبد الرحمن البراك
• شرح الرسالة التدمرية - الشيخ محمد الخميس
• شرح الرسالة التدمرية - الشيخ عبد الله الفيفي
• تقريب التدمرية - الشيخ العثيمين
• شرح تقريب التدمرية - الشيخ العثيمين
4. Al-Aqeedah as-Safaariniyyah
Sheikh Sultan al-Umayri
youtube.com/@user-vg4py1dy7t?si=ERqXH-8uQ-dH9e05
Sheikh Abdul Rahman al-Barrack
ua-cam.com/play/PLWzzF688g_niGMnfuonxEAx5SGwEx5XOG.html&si=xpNpESOOp3QueH4d
Sheikh Umar al-’Id
ua-cam.com/play/PLV01JaYtEiMx7dfiXQ-wab0DJ7IjGlzkM.html&si=x1-mefH6GfTah9OX
Authored explanation's:
• التعليقات السعدية على قطعة من نونية ابن القيم والعقيدة السفارينية
• شرح العقيدة السفارينية - الشيخ العثيمين
• شرح الدرة المضية - الشيخ الفوزان
• لوامع الأنوار البهية وسواطع الأسرار الأثرية لشرح الدرة المضية في عقد الفرقة المرضية - محمد بن أحمد السفاريني
Your videos motivate me ❤
JazakALLAH Khairan Katheera may ALLAH protect and bless you and guide your family Aameen YARABB
Alhamdulillah, majority of Muslims in Indonesia, Malaysia, Brunei and Singapore hold of Aqeedah, Asya'ri and Matudi. And that is the reason why we sent our children to Al-Azhar. We are ahli sunnah wal jamaah. But nevertheless they can learn as many topics as possible but be learned.
Jazakhallah Khair my brother, I'm glad you made this video lol. I started watching your videos and was worried because you mentioned Al-Azhar (I know they teach the wrong Aqeedah). But Alhamdulilah for the clarification Akhi, may Allah preserve you and bless you my brother.
And you as well Ameen
Do you mean Al Ash'ari Aqeedah ? Well, you can still learn at Al Azhar and reject Al Ash'ari Aqeedah
ua-cam.com/video/wFgAdXr6qic/v-deo.html my response to this
جزاك الله خيرًا أخي
Very beneficial even if you’re not going to azhar. Please keep posting beneficial videos like this and book recommendations. Jazak Allahu khairan.
واياك امين
I will inSha’Allahu
Masha Allah
Salaam ALLAH !
❤
❤
Allahu akbarr
Al-Azhar Aqeedah isn't purely Ash'ari in the traditional sense, they include aspects of what the Mu'tazilah believe and mix it together with Ash'arism.
It’s a mix for sure. But officially it’s ashari.
ua-cam.com/video/wFgAdXr6qic/v-deo.html I mention this here
Jazak Allah Khairan
بارك الله فيك ونفع الله بك البلاد والعباد
May Allah reward you
اللهم صلي وسلم وبارك على سيدنا محمد
Assalamu Alaikum! Your Qur'an Tilawah is beautiful and very pleasing to hear! May Allah reward you.
Do you have more Tilawah please?
Good job
Salaam my brother may allah bless you and eid Mubarak
Can you pls list the books in description ??
Yes I updated it,
The books mentioned:
العقيدة الواسطية لابن تيمية
شرح العقيدة الواسطية لابن عثيمين
العقود الذهبية لسلطان العميري
التدميرية لابن تيمية
الفتاوى الحموية الكبرى لابن تيمية
شرح السفارانية لابن عثيمين
العقيدة في ضوء القران والسنة لعمر الاشقر
المنة لياسر برهامي
assalamulikum bro 🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩
I love the Arabic account brother ❤️
Assalamu alaykum, can one have a full time job and simultaneously study at Azhar? BarakAllahu feek.
Yea, lecture attendance isn’t mandatory, but you need to be able to review the material for the tests well enough to pass that. Maybe some can do it, maybe some can’t depending on how they study and their ability.
BarakAllahu feek, are there perhaps part-time study options or taking a lesser load of courses and taking a bit longer to finish the studies?@@DaudBurke
Not that I know of
بارك الله فيك :)
Assalamualaikum...i was wondering as to why did you choose to follow the Ashaari aqeeda and not the way of the Prophet S.A.W and of the Salaf as those Ahl-e-Hadees or Salafi, proffes to do
Btw I do not have the Knowledge of the differences between all the aqeedas, all I know is that we should follow the orders of Allah and his Messenger as we read them in Quran and Saheeh Ahadees
I, like many others that study in azhar, hold the aqeedah of ahlu hadeeth in opposition to the official view of the university. not everyone that goes there agree with the ashari aqeedah. But the school is beneficial in many ways as long as one avoids their mistakes.
اللهم انى اشهد الله أنى أحبك فى الله
Eid ul adha Daud😊😊
❤
السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته
Bro avoid from Salafis!
Just be Sunnah
That logic is like saying don’t take a stance rather just stand around not deciding anything. I stand with the companions and their companions
@@DaudBurke companions companions are not current Salafis!
Those are ignorant romantic ones who are not related to Ahl-ee Sunnah!
As a Muslim and who knows well those bidaah ones, just reminded you.
Tbh regardless of how you look at the ummah, Sunnis salafis every group has its shortcomings and that’s not because of the belief they hold onto but rather the individual’s understanding of it and implementation. Without a doubt the understanding of the salaf is the correct way. The asharis or maatureedis brought something new to Islam that’s not from it and that’s bidah, we don’t need some philosophy based logical construct to base our faith off of, if we did, the prophet ﷺ or his companions would’ve brought it to us.
Now the problems of salafis and the bidah that has fallen into the various factions of it are many, but that’s ultimately do to a lack of knowledge and that people think oh I’m salafi so therefor I’m right about everything…
Don't recite the Qur'an like that. Sounds like you're singing
A word of advice: modern salafism being the way of the first 3 generations is a fallacy. Learn the ashaari mathhab from its books and not from the claims of its enemies.
You will understand that salafism is truly superficial (more than traditional Dhahiriyya).
Is the authentic Sunnah an evidence for them in aqeedah?
@DaudBurke Generally speaking yes. But there is a level of granularity that requires understanding the following:
1. The hierarchy of evidences.
2. The granular strength difference in hadiths.
What ashaaira say in this regards specifically:
We can't use an evidence that is (dhanniyy ظني) be it a hadith or whatever as a pillar proof for a pillar aqeeda.
We can discuss this in greater depth, but I would suggest you at least read the basics like the 3 first books of Assanusi in Aqeeda and Al Khareeda al bahiyya.
How advanced is your Arabic?
Generally speaking… you mean theoretically.. but in reality the Hadith is not a primary evidence, this is why the books of ahlu kalam are filled with the thoughts of men and here and there an ayah maybe every ten pages you find one and Hadith is rarely found, as you said they say it’s only ظني (speculative) so it gets casts to the side unless it fits with these قواطع البراهين of philosophical jargon that even the people of kalam don’t agree upon…
The books of the people of Hadith I filled to the brim with قال اللهُ قال الرسول ﷺ that’s what is not subject to mistakes given it is saheeh.
Yes I read Arabic easily and study in Azhar university and I’ve read what they teach in aqeedah. It’s like one logical equation built on another and the a sub-equation to explain the first and respond to the people who don’t think that logical equation is correct and if the daleel alhudooth has a single problem in it the whole building collapses and wallahi it’s more طني than the apparent meaning of the Quran and sunnah and then it’s used to negate حكمة رحمة كلام حقيقة and so many more attributes of Allah and all of that built on a flimsy construct of logical reasoning which given that there weren’t any issue with it, ok maybe a logical equation is قطعي but most of these found in this books no sane person can understand much less 99.9% of the ummah because each one is loaded with إجمال and then unpacking that box of worms you find the worms were feeding on worms that were feeding on worms as well… and if you are honest this way of reading was unknown at the time of the sahabah and they didn’t need it…
I study ashari aqeedah as I’m exposed to it a lot and the amount of contradictory foundations are astounding.
Why do they deny that Allah has Hikmah (wisdom) but that he has hayat (life)?
The answer for hayat is that if he didn’t have life than we would have to affirm the opposite (death) and that is degradation so we affirm life. And if someone says “isn’t life something that is like the creation, you just did tashbeeh” then the answer is but life to Allah isn’t like life to the creation.
Take this to hikmah (wisdom) they say “if we affirmed hikmah we would be saying that Allah did something with an actual reason (مناسبة) guiding his choices, and that is impossible for something else to guide his decisions, so we deny hikmah for him”
Then ahlu hadith says, “if you deny hikmah for Allah than you are affirming it's opposite which is ‘abath (doing something without a purpose) and this is degrading (aside from it being negated in the Quran) so we affirm it’s opposite (نقيض) and if someone says ‘but this is tashbeeh’ we say the hikmah of Allah is different than that of the creation”
This is just one of the areas where the contradictions come up and if the foundation of how they dealt with the attribution of hayat was taken across the board then they would agree with ahlu Al hadeeth (ie as-sunnah) but rather they hold onto other principles that contradict so they fall into so many different problems.
@DaudBurke Just read Ibn Khuldun's definition of Ilm al Kalam and you will understand why it is the way it is.
It is a much much much stronger construct, than anything you might think of as a replacement. The companions of the prophet peace be upon him were instinctive arabs, who don't need to learn nahw, sarf or balaghah. They were also not confronted with the same challenges as a few centuries later, thus the need for emerging disciplines to better link things.
Every scolar now-a-days (and even in the past 1000 years) ventures in what is essentially Ilm Al kalam, those you call ahl assunnah (which they are 100% not no matter how you want to define it) just do it without taking advantage of over 1000 years of tradition that fine-tuned this science. Thus committing contradictions as often as they breathe. (Al makan al 3adamiyy for instance).
As for why these books are not for commoners, read iljam al 3awam 3an 3ilm al kalam. The prophet himseld didn't request/expect everyone to understand every detail of Aqueeda or Fikh. That is why there were higher-ranked companions, who people would ask in case a clarification was needed.
The way the so called modern salafists argument is the way the khawarij did without the shadow of a doubt. And that coming from someone who spent almost 15 years in that school of thought learning then teaching.
I come from your destination and I am warning you so you don't waste decades before starting to understand things the right way (best case scenario).
My advice to you: Leave the areogance you acquired when adopting this school of thought aside, learn as a humble honest eager pupil, and ask Allah for guidance. Read the books of Tarajim to understand that 99.999% of the scholars of the Ummah were not what you are being told they are.
I don't like typing but we can have a short call sometime, if you are serious about this.
@@houcemrihane9982can you reply on his statement on Hikmah of Allaah. Do you affirm His Hikmah?
طلعت ازهري يابرنس🌷؟طب كنت قول وكنا نزورك لو انت ف مصر زورك لو تحب ياعمي انا لا اطيق الازهر ولا اتبع تعاليمه
Ashari aqedah IS the aqedah of ASWJ
The fact you called ash’ari against ahl as-sunnah wal jama’ah proves massive ignorance. Imam Ghazali, Imam Nawawi, Imam Hajar al-Asqalanj, Imam Suyuti, Imam Shirazi, Imam Juwayni, Imam as-Subki are all ahl al-bidah according to you? Could they not evaluate the evidences of the ash’ari aqeedah and the Hanbali aqeedah and decide which was best to follow? Were they not mujtahideen who had access to centuries of scholarship and vast knowledge of ahadith? Did not the muta’akhir Imam as-Saffarini of the Hanabila not include them in ahl as-Sunnah? Sincere scholarship will outlast the wahhabi firqah.
ashaari maturidi is aqidah of shaitan
All scholars are subject to mistakes and these aren’t all of the same level of bidah.
Imam nawwawi has some issues in sifaat but he’s clearly on the madhhab of ahlu sunnah in the vast majority of his views. He’s not ashari anyone familiar with his explanation of saheeh Muslim could see that only in a couple small areas he agreed with them, but he’s in agreement with the ashari aqeedah in the foundational belief in Iman qadar and affirmation of speaking for Allah in it’s reality without the taweel there.
Ibn hajr is the same here.
Shirazi and juwani have issues but they didn’t go so far as the later ones down the line and juwani came back to the athari aqeedah
All in all these all have contributed vast benefits to the ummah in spite of their mistakes.
You’re last line of reasoning couldn’t they figure it out…. This is not evidence in Islam. Unless there’s ijmaa on an issue (which in the case of athari aqeeda there is) we don’t look to the fact that “great people believed it so it must be true...” every one’s word we take or leave except the prophet’s word.
The fact that you say Wahabi firqah proves massive ignorance
@@DaudBurke Brother you’re skating around the question. Islam is transmitted and how do we judge transmission? By the people who transmitted it. And the ash’ari aqeedah is transmitted by incredible imams. These conversions are a wahhabi fiction of all the imams who repented from their ways and returned to the ways of ahl us-sunnah. Yes scholars did make mistakes, but the juggernauts of ahl us-sunnah are ash’ari/maturidi. Imam Ahmed and Shaykh ul Islam ibn Taymiyyah with all due respect are not the end all be all of Islam and yet you say there is an ijmaa that their aqeedah is the only one that is correct. The one who said “It is no more than a lie for any man to claim the existence of ijma‘. Whoever claims ijma‘ is telling lie,” was Imam Ahmed. I’m a revert like you brother. Leave the refutations to others and don’t poison your heart by separating yourself from your brothers. True knowledge can be found outside of Saudi Arabia and the najdi da’wah. To think all Muslims got it wrong before Abdulwahhab and Ibn Taymiyyah is a gross generalization and a fiction. Our scholars and our lay people are better than that.
Imam Ahmed had a view of not claiming there’s ijmaa as he couldn’t be everywhere at all times to know whether or not someone disagreed, in essence, he was over-cautious in claiming it. If you read the books I mentioned above especially Alhamawiya you’ll see that Ashari went back on that and he saw the ijmaa of the salaf, nobody of knowledge- asharis or not- claim that ibn Taymiyah is lying or untrustworthy when he narrates the sayings of the Imams of the past. Also, the Imams of ahlu sunnah such as Al Bukhari clearly went against the ashari belief and claimed ijamaa on the issue of Iman being qaul and aml -- do you not trust him?! Also, you won’t find a single of the four Imams go against athari aqeeda. In fact, all of the schools of thought regarding fiqh are all Salafi and that is clear went it comes to what they agree is kufr and Iman as asharis don’t think something someone does is automatically kufr unless it is accompanied by the belief (ex: some one makes salah to a false god other than Allah/ all the four madhabs agree that in itself is kufr, the asharis say it's only kufr if he believed that the false god had some type of power) and they actually make the aqeedah of the salaf kufr and if it wasn’t for our “ignorance” we would’ve been considered kuffar. They believe that the apparent meaning of the vast majority of the Quran and Sunnah is kufr. If you thought about the fact that the salaf isn’t some invention of some new sect and stopped assuming that our scholars lied about this stuff, you would know that the transmission isn’t the issue. Claiming transmission is the issue is essentially claiming that the scholars were lying about that and this is huge.. and the asharis don’t claim that they were lying about their narrations.
I don’t separate myself from my brothers but I also don’t leave the Quran and the sunnah for the sake of “unity”. Didn’t the prophet ﷺ break up his people when he came with the truth?! You can’t pick a middle ground with Aqeedah and agree to disagree when it’s been made clear. So it’s those who go against the salaf that have created the division and you can’t expect us to change for them for the sake of us overlooking differences. Also until you have read the works that I mentioned you shouldn’t be so sure that you’re on the truth. I’ve read both sides and heard the arguments…
They say Allah doesn’t have rahmah/mercy that should be enough to tell you they are wrong as the opening of the Quran is ﷽
Man, unfortunately you need to learn a bit more about ahlsunnah walgamaah. I feel sorry for you but i would tell tou that : 80 % of muslims is ashari and maturidi and that what we call ahl suunah walgamaah
Is the sunnah a hujjah to them in aqeedah? Or what about following ijmaa’ of the salaf? That’s what ahlu sunnah means not merely who got the biggest jamaa’h. A video response is on its way inSha’Allahu
Bukhari, Muslim, tirmathi, Abu dawood, imam Malik, shafi’i, muzani, azzuhri, Ahmed, Abu hanifa, his major students, ibn abd barr, the list goes on and on. Ibn katheer, adhahabii, idk what you need more than this and to know inside the salaf were more ulama than you can grab names for late comers. Also 99% of the actual ummah have no clue of the abcs of ilm kalam so idk what you need more than that to show this shubuhah is bogus.
Habibi, what are the chances that a random stranger on the internet will accept your da'wah or your explanations that Salafiyyah is upon the truth or your explanation of what Sheikh Muhammad ibn A'bdul-Wahhab did and meant?
Why are you wasting you're time despite being among the ones whom Allah honoured with knowledge? I'm by no means perfect but one of the means (If I remember correctly) that one becomes ignorant and deprived of the blessings of knowledge is by wasting time.
One top of that, some people are like leaches, they suck out your Iman, time and energy while destroying themselves in idle things and argumentation.
The amount of time you spent writing all these messages must have been IMMENSE. Akhi leave it off, this is the internet and only 1% out of all people you debate will ever change their ways and accept what you say, and even that can take MONTHS or YEARS of discussion.
I don't think as a student of knowledge it befits you my dear brother to be pulled down by people and consequently indulging in their affairs.
Remember, toxic people have a very strong "aura" and they can drag even dignified and wise people into ignorance and lowliness.
Think of what the A'immah of this Ummah would do if they were faced with the same situations as you. I remember Sheikh Fawzan being interrupted by a caller who didn't have any ill intentions but maybe lacked a little bit of manners. The Sheikh didn't argue or talk over him. He just said to bring another one.
If I were to debate everybody in the comments, as much as it took to prove a point, with its evidences, then of course what you say is pretty much spot on.
But this Hadith:
Sahl bin Sa'd (May Allah be pleased with him) reported:
The Prophet (ﷺ) said to 'Ali (May Allah be pleased with him), "By Allah, if a single person is guided by Allah through you, it will be better for you than a whole lot of red camels."
[Al-Bukhari and Muslim].
وعن سهل بن سعد رضي الله عنه أن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم قال لعلي رضي الله عنه : "فوالله لأن يهدي الله بك رجلا واحدا خير من حمر النعم" ((متفق عليه))
I hope that even one person is guided by this dawah.
And this ayah
وَإِذۡ قَالَتۡ أُمَّةࣱ مِّنۡهُمۡ لِمَ تَعِظُونَ قَوۡمًا ٱللَّهُ مُهۡلِكُهُمۡ أَوۡ مُعَذِّبُهُمۡ عَذَابࣰا شَدِیدࣰاۖ قَالُوا۟ مَعۡذِرَةً إِلَىٰ رَبِّكُمۡ وَلَعَلَّهُمۡ یَتَّقُونَ﴿ ١٦٤ ﴾ فَلَمَّا نَسُوا۟ مَا ذُكِّرُوا۟ بِهِۦۤ أَنجَیۡنَا ٱلَّذِینَ یَنۡهَوۡنَ عَنِ ٱلسُّوۤءِ وَأَخَذۡنَا ٱلَّذِینَ ظَلَمُوا۟ بِعَذَابِۭ بَـِٔیسِۭ بِمَا كَانُوا۟ یَفۡسُقُونَ﴿ ١٦٥ ﴾
• Muhsin Khan and Taqi-ud-Din al-Hilali:
And when a community among them said: "Why do you preach to a people whom Allah is about to destroy or to punish with a severe torment?" (The preachers) said: "In order to be free from guilt before your Lord (Allah), and perhaps they may fear Allah."
So when they forgot the remindings that had been given to them, We rescued those who forbade evil, but We seized those who did wrong with a severe torment because they used to rebel (disobey Allah).
Al-A'raf, Ayah 164 - Al-A'raf, Ayah 165.
As far as “auras” goes this is a new age term and concept that could be best left, but without a doubt people’s words that come from sick heart can make the person reading it feel that.
But I mainly agree with you about time shouldn’t be wasted so I don’t try to put in time to respond to those who won’t benefit.
Didn't know you where a Wahabi
I’m a shafi’i Sunni Muslim that holds the aqeedah of ahlu al-hadeeth like my imam ashaafi’. If I’m considered a wahabi, no problem, the name is good, and the person connected to the term was an imam in defending the sunnah from shirk and bida’ I don’t agree with all of his decisions of course but admire him and his dawah.
أعوذ بالله.
What's that? إنا لله وإنا إليه راجعون
هذا غناء!
ua-cam.com/users/liveVszYZT3H7D8?si=kJERbBsNCX2eehGH
انظر إلى قول العالم من 31:00
Brother you should really do research on islamic history and aqeedah. Stop this sectarianism. Of you truly believe that the majority of the ummah are against ahl sunnah, then that is a big issue.
Akhi the majority of the Ummah are not Ashari, if we say that then that is complete lies
To be an Ashari you must study the aqeedah of the Ashariyyah, you can’t just be one, as it involves kalaam, the majority of the Ummah are laypeople
Which automatically means that the Ummah is not Ashari
@@AbuAbdullahAlHanbali unfortunately I don't think you understand that much of the ummah are adhari and maturidi In aqeedah. The early athari aqeedah is fine too. Unfortunately due to Mohammed Ibn Abdul wahab sectarianism that you see today has taken place. Either read your history and understand the differences or even read contemporary work on the ummah and broaden your horizons insha'Allah.
Speaking about the correct understanding of Aqeedah is not sectarianism at all. Ilm ul Kalam is Bida'a no matter which way you look at it and we need to callout anyone who tries to make these issues seem like it's a light issue, because its not just a "light issue". Having the wrong Aqeedah could land you in the naar. Btw even if your argument is "majority of the scholars are Ashari" What's your daleel for it? And even if its true, So what? We as Muslims follow the Prophet SAW, the Sahaba, the Tabb'i, the Taba Tabb'i, the Salaf and the Aqeedah which they are upon. It doesn't matter what scholar said what, Haqq is Haqq and Batil is Batil.
@@Fvrside Kalam is a tool that was used to defend the 'Aqeedah of the Salaf. That's all Abul Hassan Al Ash'ari did. After he left the way of the Mu'tazilah he used the kalam methodology to defend the 'aqeedah of the Ahl al-hadith. Even today we find it useful to debate against atheists and others...
@@mouradali8270 This is not true at all lol. Kalam led people to believe the Quran is Makhluq, make Tahrif on verses, and people like Al Razi (who the Asharis love and study) said that the Aql comes before the Naql (the Quran and Sunnah) Naudhubillah. Stop down playing Kalam as if it’s a “tool for atheism”. La, it’s not. Who from the Salaf asked to use Pagan Greek philosophy and combine with Islamic concepts to refute Atheism? The Quran and Sunnah is enough for me and the Ummah, the teachings of the Salaf are enough for me and the Ummah, and I will never in my life put the Aql over the Naql, Naudubillah. The Naql is always over the Aql, and that’s the way of the Salaf. May Allah protect me and the rest of the Ummah, keep us away from Ilm ul Kalam and upon the way of the Salaf.