So did Brain... though he’s critized, and Paul must have kids he didn’t want to. You can’t go for years of sex with so many different girls, without empregnant some.
I know, You did not even list Jane Asher (by name) as a girlfriend at all, just a side note, thought he was actually engaged to her... Most of these ladies were the side notes or two or three night stands.
Jane was his true love, and she was the one that connected him to those who were the catalysts of his career. He regretted cheating on her. You are so right , she was not a side note. Google her if you are unaware.
What difference does it make! Not one of us walked a mile in his moccasins. Paul did the best he could with what he had to work with at that time. Not one of us is in anyway is qualified to judge Paul McCartney. Or anyone else.
It'll be amazing to see all the dirty laundry that has been suppressed all these years from nondisclosure agreements Paul has paid for through the years.
@@mishaleng6493 Yes! She said in an interview that she had a crush on him starting when she was 13. She said she was lucky she got to date him when she was18.
Lads like Paul, wether in a band or not, don’t really have to pursue girls. Women pursue them ! The Hunter/ gatherer instinct is therefore quite low and this affects libido and drive. Paul doesn’t pretend to be some kind of ‘ stud ‘ and there are virtually no accounts of his prowess with women; he never had to run or sharpen his spear like most of us ! He likes homely ‘ girl-next-door ‘ types and that’s about it. He’s just a normal guy in this respect, his love life is not the stuff of legend like Tom Jones !
I believe people are hypocrite. the Stones especially Brian Jones did that and everybody hates on him for not taking care of his kids, but Paul and John did the same, they had groupies and they were unfaithful and who knows how many kids they don’t even know exists or abandon their paternety? I don’t see the difference, they had so many girls but wouldn’t look for responsablities because they were at the peak of their career, and immature. but sure it’s not an excuse.
Yeah, he's the only celebrity I can think of who had women tattling to Penthouse that he was an "average" lover. That's like the only thing they said! What a scandal!
There have been different Paul's over the years. The one who married Heather Mills in 2002 is not the one who married Nancy 9 years later. And the "Faul" today is not the "Billy" who replaced Haliday in 1966.
No idea why this barely mentions Paul's main girlfriend (and one-time fiancée ) Jane Asher, who he was with from 1963 - 68. Most of the women mentioned here (apart from Dot, Francie and Maggie) weren't girlfriends so much as women he dated a few times. Plenty of people were like this, especially in the 60's, not just rock stars.
PM should have been honest with Jane, so that she could have moved on with her acting and someone new in her life. She eventually did because she's strong and principled. However, not before Paul tried to destroy her heart. A loved the fact that Jane just turned around and left him standing there, while later her mother came in to collect her things. GAME OVER!
@@justlina2769 Yes, Jane did move on and to a much better man. However, I think had Paul just told her that he wanted to see other people, she would have accepted it. She was only 22 and believed everything Paul said since she was 17. It must have been very difficult for her to walk in on him with another girl in their bed. Had he been honest, I think they could have been friends over the years. As it is without trust there is no relationship and Jane knew this. Yes, Paul lived with the Asher' from 1963 to about 1966, when he purchased his home in London.
I think they were so young they would of done it with anyone inmean one movie I saw a guy was doing something with a pie they are young and horny they would of done it with anyone
Все это сплетни не верьте,у других битов было не меньше подружек,просто на Пола все, кому не лень, нападают потому, что (подпевает Джону,который на весь мир говорил про Пола гадости,сам сказал,что Пол легкая мишень .
Why is this narrated by a whispering spanish accented man?Its super obnoxious.I'm just enjoying the pictures.I really can't listen to this absurdly narrated video.
John and Paul build The BEATLES and they were so famous for their Music. No problem with their private life. Now Sir McCartney is old and very rich. Good retirement for him. All I'm still interested with ? Their legacy through their albums. One of my favorite is The White Album. The older they were, the greatest their Music was more amazing
@@nadiachristiansen7599Paul has the same scar on his lip to this day since his famous ***December 26th 1965 moped accident*** which has naturally changed over a lifetime. A plastic surgeon would have had cut deep and rip open "Faul's lip in 1966 and we know that didn't happen as we would've noticed how deep and fresh it was. Like it was in 1965 again. Placing scars on lips to last a lifetime which changes over time (which it did) is not like putting on a never changing Lego piece. Lol. And there is the little matter of your so called lookalike who needed plastic surgery to look more like Paul (according to all the varying logistically impossible fantasies) yet somehow has a son James in 1977 with the***same droopy eyes, raised eyebrows and exact chin as 1963 Paul***And then when James becomes an older man is a doppelganger to Paul's brother Michael. Lol. Oh and Paul's ***"Granny"*** music as John liked to call it picks up at times in the 70s. His dad's music hall influences growing up (he even records his dad's only doing and gives it to him in the 70's as a present). His dad at Paul's 1969 small private wedding. Michael and Paul way in the background going to lunch not even knowing they are in the shot in Get Back, bought his Scottish farm on June 17th 1966, etc. ==== He only got better at bass from 1966 onward because the times and music called for more complicated riffs. And you are comparing a baby fat Paul at 22 to a Paul with no baby fat in his mid then to late 20s. Also his style and facial hair changed as so did the rest of our culture did in 66 onward. And saying Paul is shorter than Faul is borderline retarded. Every single photo that those tin foil hat sites bring forward are forced perspective illusion photos which is a natural phenomenon when people are standing beside each other and one is standing slightly in front of each other. Take a photography course sometime as it happens every day. These tinfoil hat sites are fraudulent on purpose with the sole purpose of convincing the easily fooled that everyone else are the unthinking sheep. You go into these sites and think you are doing research. Go learn about the Beatles. Listen to their music. There is no difference in his voice nor his creative voice and musical ability other than growing exponentially between 1962 and 1970.
@@SuperNevile John hated when people said that. In his audio Rolling Stone 1970 interview he got more than slightly upset about it. Check it out if you haven't already. He was saying George Martin gives himself way too much credit and was mad about it. Insisting it was mostly him and Paul. I agree with you though. They were too young for some of those arrangements. In the early years especially. But by the last two albums Glynn Johns and George Martin literally just stood there waiting to press the record button while they awaited Paul's go ahead. Lol. But maybe that's why they needed Spector to clean it all up.
Is the Sandra Cohan part correct,the Beatles hardly spent anytime in London before they made it big,and Love Me Do,though attempted in June was only recorded and decided upon as the single less than a month before its release,they weren’t waiting months for its release.
What exactly was the meaning of the word Japtard back then? You said Paul wrote a note referring to Yoko Ono as a Japtard. I've googled and tried to find an older definition of the word but failed.
@@Mozart1220 John was married when Yoko appeared. She agreed to go yo Cynthia and John's home when she was out and she wear her bedcloth. The fault was John's, and I don't have any problem for them, but still think she was evil.
Its "Jap tart". Both are derogatory or dismissive words. Japanese (but as a slur, it would have been a greater slur in America at that time period) and Woman (but as a slur, it's more dismissive than insulting) The quote comes from Francie Schwartz , she told the story when Paul and her broke up. It is not particularly reliable as she is the only person who remembers this and descriptions of her relationship with Paul is that it was a bad relationship that ended badly. She is very defense of Yoko and remains a supporter and friend to her. Something may have happened, but Francie has motive to exhagerate and there is no supporting evidence.
Paul never hit any of his wives or girlfriends and pretty much raised John’s first kid AND adopted his first wife’s child as his own. John IS the worst and Paul is definitely the best out of all of them lol
It's a bit silly to say any of them are the worst, how judgmental. But also, John and George (and probably Ringo) were just as unfaithful, causing many problems and hurt feelings with their gfs and wives.
@@nadiachristiansen7599Paul has the same scar on his lip to this day since his famous ***December 26th 1965 moped accident*** which has naturally changed over a lifetime. A plastic surgeon would have had cut deep and rip open "Faul's lip in 1966 and we know that didn't happen as we would've noticed how deep and fresh it was. Like it was in 1965 again. Placing scars on lips to last a lifetime which changes over time (which it did) is not like putting on a never changing Lego piece. Lol. And there is the little matter of your so called lookalike who needed plastic surgery to look more like Paul (according to all the varying logistically impossible fantasies) yet somehow has a son James in 1977 with the***same droopy eyes, raised eyebrows and exact chin as 1963 Paul***And then when James becomes an older man is a doppelganger to Paul's brother Michael. Lol. Oh and Paul's ***"Granny"*** music as John liked to call it picks up at times in the 70s. His dad's music hall influences growing up (he even records his dad's only doing and gives it to him in the 70's as a present). His dad at Paul's 1969 small private wedding. Michael and Paul way in the background going to lunch not even knowing they are in the shot in Get Back, bought his Scottish farm on June 17th 1966, etc. ==== He only got better at bass from 1966 onward because the times and music called for more complicated riffs. And you are comparing a baby fat Paul at 22 to a Paul with no baby fat in his mid then to late 20s. Also his style and facial hair changed as so did the rest of our culture did in 66 onward. And saying Paul is shorter than Faul is borderline retarded. Every single photo that those tin foil hat sites bring forward are forced perspective illusion photos which is a natural phenomenon when people are standing beside each other and one is standing slightly in front of each other. Take a photography course sometime as it happens every day. These tinfoil hat sites are fraudulent on purpose with the sole purpose of convincing the easily fooled that everyone else are the unthinking sheep. You go into these sites and think you are doing research. Go learn about the Beatles. Listen to their music. There is no difference in his voice nor his creative voice and musical ability other than growing exponentially between 1962 and 1970.
Now , the girl with the squinty eyes Dot Rhodes. That is who John Hailday is still married to today. Coincidences in their world happens too often. If I wasn’t 100% certain he was biological Paul. I wouldn’t post . Glad he’s not dead. He has referred to himself as John and laughed about it on a few occasions if you search on line . He just retired very young , or was ordered with the other 3 Beatles to leave . Great stuff!!
She did not look very pretty. Imagine if she had not miscarried. He would have felt obliged to marry her, and it would have been another Cyn and John. Him wanting to make it in the world, and this woman and kid always in the background, spoiling it for him. Paul had a lucky escape.
Paul has the same scar on his lip to this day since his famous ***December 26th 1965 moped accident*** which has naturally changed over a lifetime. A plastic surgeon would have had cut deep and rip open "Faul's lip in 1966 and we know that didn't happen as we would've noticed how deep and fresh it was. Like it was in 1965 again. Placing scars on lips to last a lifetime which changes over time (which it did) is not like putting on a never changing Lego piece. Lol. And there is the little matter of your so called lookalike who needed plastic surgery to look more like Paul (according to all the varying logistically impossible fantasies) yet somehow has a son James in 1977 with the***same droopy eyes, raised eyebrows and exact chin as 1963 Paul***And then when James becomes an older man is a doppelganger to Paul's brother Michael. Lol. Oh and Paul's ***"Granny"*** music as John liked to call it picks up at times in the 70s. His dad's music hall influences growing up (he even records his dad's only doing and gives it to him in the 70's as a present). His dad at Paul's 1969 small private wedding. Michael and Paul way in the background going to lunch not even knowing they are in the shot in Get Back, bought his Scottish farm on June 17th 1966, etc. ==== He only got better at bass from 1966 onward because the times and music called for more complicated riffs. And you are comparing a baby fat Paul at 22 to a Paul with no baby fat in his mid then to late 20s. Also his style and facial hair changed as so did the rest of our culture did in 66 onward. And saying Paul is shorter than Faul is borderline retarded. Every single photo that those tin foil hat sites bring forward are forced perspective illusion photos which is a natural phenomenon when people are standing beside each other and one is standing slightly in front of each other. Take a photography course sometime as it happens every day. These tinfoil hat sites are fraudulent on purpose with the sole purpose of convincing the easily fooled that everyone else are the unthinking sheep. You go into these sites and think you are doing research. Go learn about the Beatles. Listen to their music. There is no difference in his voice nor his creative voice and musical ability other than growing exponentially between 1962 and 1970.
Paul was young- he had pick of the litter. Linda had esquitarian knowledge. She didn't break in the Bucking Bronco Rider. They were mutually meant to be.
Paul has the same scar on his lip to this day since his famous ***December 26th 1965 moped accident*** which has naturally changed over a lifetime. A plastic surgeon would have had cut deep and rip open "Faul's lip in 1966 and we know that didn't happen as we would've noticed how deep and fresh it was. Like it was in 1965 again. Placing scars on lips to last a lifetime which changes over time (which it did) is not like putting on a never changing Lego piece. Lol. And there is the little matter of your so called lookalike who needed plastic surgery to look more like Paul (according to all the varying logistically impossible fantasies) yet somehow has a son James in 1977 with the***same droopy eyes, raised eyebrows and exact chin as 1963 Paul***And then when James becomes an older man is a doppelganger to Paul's brother Michael. Lol. Oh and Paul's ***"Granny"*** music as John liked to call it picks up at times in the 70s. His dad's music hall influences growing up (he even records his dad's only doing and gives it to him in the 70's as a present). His dad at Paul's 1969 small private wedding. Michael and Paul way in the background going to lunch not even knowing they are in the shot in Get Back, bought his Scottish farm on June 17th 1966, etc. ==== He only got better at bass from 1966 onward because the times and music called for more complicated riffs. And you are comparing a baby fat Paul at 22 to a Paul with no baby fat in his mid then to late 20s. Also his style and facial hair changed as so did the rest of our culture did in 66 onward. And saying Paul is shorter than Faul is borderline retarded. Every single photo that those tin foil hat sites bring forward are forced perspective illusion photos which is a natural phenomenon when people are standing beside each other and one is standing slightly in front of each other. Take a photography course sometime as it happens every day. These tinfoil hat sites are fraudulent on purpose with the sole purpose of convincing the easily fooled that everyone else are the unthinking sheep. You go into these sites and think you are doing research. Go learn about the Beatles. Listen to their music. There is no difference in his voice nor his creative voice and musical ability other than growing exponentially between 1962 and 1970.
@@nadiachristiansen7599Paul has the same scar on his lip to this day since his famous ***December 26th 1965 moped accident*** which has naturally changed over a lifetime. A plastic surgeon would have had cut deep and rip open "Faul's lip in 1966 and we know that didn't happen as we would've noticed how deep and fresh it was. Like it was in 1965 again. Placing scars on lips to last a lifetime which changes over time (which it did) is not like putting on a never changing Lego piece. Lol. And there is the little matter of your so called lookalike who needed plastic surgery to look more like Paul (according to all the varying logistically impossible fantasies) yet somehow has a son James in 1977 with the***same droopy eyes, raised eyebrows and exact chin as 1963 Paul***And then when James becomes an older man is a doppelganger to Paul's brother Michael. Lol. Oh and Paul's ***"Granny"*** music as John liked to call it picks up at times in the 70s. His dad's music hall influences growing up (he even records his dad's only doing and gives it to him in the 70's as a present). His dad at Paul's 1969 small private wedding. Michael and Paul way in the background going to lunch not even knowing they are in the shot in Get Back, bought his Scottish farm on June 17th 1966, etc. ==== He only got better at bass from 1966 onward because the times and music called for more complicated riffs. And you are comparing a baby fat Paul at 22 to a Paul with no baby fat in his mid then to late 20s. Also his style and facial hair changed as so did the rest of our culture did in 66 onward. And saying Paul is shorter than Faul is borderline retarded. Every single photo that those tin foil hat sites bring forward are forced perspective illusion photos which is a natural phenomenon when people are standing beside each other and one is standing slightly in front of each other. Take a photography course sometime as it happens every day. These tinfoil hat sites are fraudulent on purpose with the sole purpose of convincing the easily fooled that everyone else are the unthinking sheep. You go into these sites and think you are doing research. Go learn about the Beatles. Listen to their music. There is no difference in his voice nor his creative voice and musical ability other than growing exponentially between 1962 and 1970.
How anyone thinks Paul 62-66 is the same guy as 67-72, please look again real close , listen to them talk, watch how they play the bass and most of all, compare the voices on old Beatles songs. Different person . Billy Shears
Paul has the same scar on his lip to this day since his famous ***December 26th 1965 moped accident*** which has naturally changed over a lifetime. A plastic surgeon would have had cut deep and rip open "Faul's lip in 1966 and we know that didn't happen as we would've noticed how deep and fresh it was. Like it was in 1965 again. Placing scars on lips to last a lifetime which changes over time (which it did) is not like putting on a never changing Lego piece. Lol. And there is the little matter of your so called lookalike who needed plastic surgery to look more like Paul (according to all the varying logistically impossible fantasies) yet somehow has a son James in 1977 with the***same droopy eyes, raised eyebrows and exact chin as 1963 Paul***And then when James becomes an older man is a doppelganger to Paul's brother Michael. Lol. Oh and Paul's ***"Granny"*** music as John liked to call it picks up at times in the 70s. His dad's music hall influences growing up (he even records his dad's only doing and gives it to him in the 70's as a present). His dad at Paul's 1969 small private wedding. Michael and Paul way in the background going to lunch not even knowing they are in the shot in Get Back, bought his Scottish farm on June 17th 1966, etc. ==== He only got better at bass from 1966 onward because the times and music called for more complicated riffs. And you are comparing a baby fat Paul at 22 to a Paul with no baby fat in his mid then to late 20s. Also his style and facial hair changed as so did the rest of our culture did in 66 onward. And saying Paul is shorter than Faul is borderline retarded. Every single photo that those tin foil hat sites bring forward are forced perspective illusion photos which is a natural phenomenon when people are standing beside each other and one is standing slightly in front of each other. Take a photography course sometime as it happens every day. These tinfoil hat sites are fraudulent on purpose with the sole purpose of convincing the easily fooled that everyone else are the unthinking sheep. You go into these sites and think you are doing research. Go learn about the Beatles. Listen to their music. There is no difference in his voice nor his creative voice and musical ability other than growing exponentially between 1962 and 1970.
Yeah. He picked up a girl named Rita that night he had an argument with the other 3 Beatles and he had yelled and screamed at John and told Brian Epstein to shut up. Now Rita had realised who he was and she couldn't resist but hug and kiss Paul which made Paul lose control of his vehicle and it crashed. It happened in 1966
Paul has the same scar on his lip to this day since his famous ***December 26th 1965 moped accident*** which has naturally changed over a lifetime. A plastic surgeon would have had cut deep and rip open "Faul's lip in 1966 and we know that didn't happen as we would've noticed how deep and fresh it was. Like it was in 1965 again. Placing scars on lips to last a lifetime which changes over time (which it did) is not like putting on a never changing Lego piece. Lol. And there is the little matter of your so called lookalike who needed plastic surgery to look more like Paul (according to all the varying logistically impossible fantasies) yet somehow has a son James in 1977 with the***same droopy eyes, raised eyebrows and exact chin as 1963 Paul***And then when James becomes an older man is a doppelganger to Paul's brother Michael. Lol. Oh and Paul's ***"Granny"*** music as John liked to call it picks up at times in the 70s. His dad's music hall influences growing up (he even records his dad's only doing and gives it to him in the 70's as a present). His dad at Paul's 1969 small private wedding. Michael and Paul way in the background going to lunch not even knowing they are in the shot in Get Back, bought his Scottish farm on June 17th 1966, etc. ==== He only got better at bass from 1966 onward because the times and music called for more complicated riffs. And you are comparing a baby fat Paul at 22 to a Paul with no baby fat in his mid then to late 20s. Also his style and facial hair changed as so did the rest of our culture did in 66 onward. And saying Paul is shorter than Faul is borderline retarded. Every single photo that those tin foil hat sites bring forward are forced perspective illusion photos which is a natural phenomenon when people are standing beside each other and one is standing slightly in front of each other. Take a photography course sometime as it happens every day. These tinfoil hat sites are fraudulent on purpose with the sole purpose of convincing the easily fooled that everyone else are the unthinking sheep. You go into these sites and think you are doing research. Go learn about the Beatles. Listen to their music. There is no difference in his voice nor his creative voice and musical ability other than growing exponentially between 1962 and 1970.
There is a photo of the Beatles travelling (I believe it was on a ferry) that has in-frame, Paul McCartney and Jane Asher - and a bit further away, sitting next to each other was Paul's double William Shears Campbell chatting with the photographer, Linda Eastman. The latter two went on to form the band Wings.
@@christrontherobot4100 nope. Billy was also in photos in February 1964 in the USA with Paul and George in front of him. Billy took over the Paul part when Paul died.
@@Mozart1220Well there are actually two Faul's really. After Paul's death in 1966 Billy Shears took over. He earned to make Sgt Pepper and Magical Mystery Tour. After the India trip where they tried to transfer Paul's soul into Billy's body so Billy Shears' soul and failed, they returned to London to work on their next album that would be White Album. Here, Billy got into some arguments with John and one of the days, they spent some hours taking pictures in parks and streets in London, that's the sessions known as The Beatles Mad Day Out. There, John planned to get rid of Billy. He had discussed it with George and Ringo. The band was standing on a rooftop, where Billy was standing at the edge. As the photographer began to shoot John pushed Billy over the edge and Billy Shears was history. They found a second Paul-look-a-like who was now to replace both Paul McCartney (1942-1966) and Billy Shears (1937-1968). His name was William Campbell and he had to continue Billy's projects. Justice for Billy Shears. You just wanted to do your job and finish what Paul McCartney started. John how could you
Paul has the same scar on his lip to this day since his famous ***December 26th 1965 moped accident*** which has naturally changed over a lifetime. A plastic surgeon would have had cut deep and rip open "Faul's lip in 1966 and we know that didn't happen as we would've noticed how deep and fresh it was. Like it was in 1965 again. Placing scars on lips to last a lifetime which changes over time (which it did) is not like putting on a never changing Lego piece. Lol. And there is the little matter of your so called lookalike who needed plastic surgery to look more like Paul (according to all the varying logistically impossible fantasies) yet somehow has a son James in 1977 with the***same droopy eyes, raised eyebrows and exact chin as 1963 Paul***And then when James becomes an older man is a doppelganger to Paul's brother Michael. Lol. Oh and Paul's ***"Granny"*** music as John liked to call it picks up at times in the 70s. His dad's music hall influences growing up (he even records his dad's only doing and gives it to him in the 70's as a present). His dad at Paul's 1969 small private wedding. Michael and Paul way in the background going to lunch not even knowing they are in the shot in Get Back, bought his Scottish farm on June 17th 1966, etc. ==== He only got better at bass from 1966 onward because the times and music called for more complicated riffs. And you are comparing a baby fat Paul at 22 to a Paul with no baby fat in his mid then to late 20s. Also his style and facial hair changed as so did the rest of our culture did in 66 onward. And saying Paul is shorter than Faul is borderline retarded. Every single photo that those tin foil hat sites bring forward are forced perspective illusion photos which is a natural phenomenon when people are standing beside each other and one is standing slightly in front of each other. Take a photography course sometime as it happens every day. These tinfoil hat sites are fraudulent on purpose with the sole purpose of convincing the easily fooled that everyone else are the unthinking sheep. You go into these sites and think you are doing research. Go learn about the Beatles. Listen to their music. There is no difference in his voice nor his creative voice and musical ability other than growing exponentially between 1962 and 1970.
I think I just like women! Paul McCartney. End of subject.
So did Brain... though he’s critized, and Paul must have kids he didn’t want to. You can’t go for years of sex with so many different girls, without empregnant some.
I know, You did not even list Jane Asher (by name) as a girlfriend at all, just a side note, thought he was actually engaged to her... Most of these ladies were the side notes or two or three night stands.
Jane was his true love, and she was the one that connected him to those who were the catalysts of his career. He regretted cheating on her. You are so right , she was not a side note. Google her if you are unaware.
Ese Paul era un loquillo 😆
Totalmente de acuerdo
I barely understood a word the narrator said.
They had more girlfriends than underwear.
I'm out here never even talked to the amount of girls he had relationships with.
What difference does it make! Not one of us walked a mile in his moccasins. Paul did the best he could with what he had to work with at that time.
Not one of us is in anyway is qualified to judge Paul McCartney. Or anyone else.
It'll be amazing to see all the dirty laundry that has been suppressed all these years from nondisclosure agreements Paul has paid for through the years.
Is that purely speculation, or is there some tangible proof that he did that? I mean, he didn't even sign a prenup when he married Heather Mills.
@@gurutuphilip that is what you were TOLD.
@@jenniferw4068 It’s a matter of fact.. There were ugly court battles over money.
Felix, what’s it like being such a low life pos.
@@BadfingerBoogieBarbwhere' s be possible to read about that?
What about Jane Asher?
And Francis who stayed at his London home
Jane has worked hard to distance herself from Paul. It's disrespectful to add her in this mess.
You forgot Twiggy and Peggy Lipton.
He was with Twiggy?
@@mishaleng6493 Yes! She said in an interview that she had a crush on him starting when she was 13. She said she was lucky she got to date him when she was18.
@@paulascaglione9701 Woah! I never knew that, interesting
@@mishaleng6493 Paul and Twiggy are still friends, so their dating was probably more going/hanging out than being together.
The Fab 4 were in their prime
So many girls so little time
Not cute, "silly love" to abandon one's own children, deny paternity (that transmits shame of rejection to offspring), and cause abortions.
Lads like Paul, wether in a band or not, don’t really have to pursue girls. Women pursue them ! The Hunter/ gatherer instinct is therefore quite low and this affects libido and drive. Paul doesn’t pretend to be some kind of ‘ stud ‘ and there are virtually no accounts of his prowess with women; he never had to run or sharpen his spear like most of us ! He likes homely ‘ girl-next-door ‘ types and that’s about it. He’s just a normal guy in this respect, his love life is not the stuff of legend like Tom Jones !
I believe people are hypocrite. the Stones especially Brian Jones did that and everybody hates on him for not taking care of his kids, but Paul and John did the same, they had groupies and they were unfaithful and who knows how many kids they don’t even know exists or abandon their paternety? I don’t see the difference, they had so many girls but wouldn’t look for responsablities because they were at the peak of their career, and immature. but sure it’s not an excuse.
You talk as if you knew them. Did you?
@@erudite60 those are public infos.
Yeah, he's the only celebrity I can think of who had women tattling to Penthouse that he was an
"average" lover. That's like the only thing they said! What a scandal!
WOW Great videos, pictures I've never seen, GOOD insight. To bad the narrator, can't speak English!
I had to turn on captions to make out some of the words. The narrator has a very strong accent.
His English is better than your German.
cannot understand any thing he is saying
He was the "Tony Curtis" of Liverpool High in the 50s. He liked Rock n Roll AND " birds" WHO liked to ROCK N ROLL ( Wink)
How handsome is Paul !!!!!
Muy apuesto y tenía un perfil perfecto 😁💕💕💕
There have been different Paul's over the years. The one who married Heather Mills in 2002 is not the one who married Nancy 9 years later.
And the "Faul" today is not the "Billy" who replaced Haliday in 1966.
@@NaaHva 🤣🤣🤣🤣
No idea why this barely mentions Paul's main girlfriend (and one-time fiancée ) Jane Asher, who he was with from 1963 - 68. Most of the women mentioned here (apart from Dot, Francie and Maggie) weren't girlfriends so much as women he dated a few times. Plenty of people were like this, especially in the 60's, not just rock stars.
People dated more and went out more back in 60s?? Wow!
PM should have been honest with Jane, so that she could have moved on with her acting and someone new in her life. She eventually did because she's strong and principled. However, not before Paul tried to destroy her heart. A loved the fact that Jane just turned around and left him standing there, while later her mother came in to collect her things. GAME OVER!
@@lisas3545 I thought she moved on because she found Paul in bed with another woman... but Paul lived in Jane Asher's house for awhile I read.
@@justlina2769 Yes, Jane did move on and to a much better man.
However, I think had Paul just told her that he wanted to see other people, she would have accepted it. She was only 22 and believed everything Paul said since she was 17. It must have been very difficult for her to walk in on him with another girl in their bed. Had he been honest, I think they could have been friends over the years. As it is without trust there is no relationship and Jane knew this.
Yes, Paul lived with the Asher' from 1963 to about 1966, when he purchased his home in London.
He was madly in love with Jane Asher n she with him...that's why he proposed marriage on Dec. 25th, 1967!!!!!!
It's pronounced Apple Core, not Apple Corps. It's a pun..
At 11:34 Philip Paul in 1997 looks plausibly Paul's son.
nowhere near
Damn so many babies I never thought that of Paul
And at least one aborted one. Disappointing to learn of cherub~faced "love all around" Paul.
If this was a one night stand video it would probably last hours.
I think they were so young they would of done it with anyone inmean one movie I saw a guy was doing something with a pie they are young and horny they would of done it with anyone
She Loves You yeah yeah yeah
Who is
The Narrator?
He can’t even speak English‼️
Все это сплетни не верьте,у других битов было не меньше подружек,просто на Пола все, кому не лень, нападают потому, что (подпевает Джону,который на весь мир говорил про Пола гадости,сам сказал,что Пол легкая мишень
.
It's on UA-cam so it must all be true.
You forgot me lmaoo
So in other words he had a lootttttt of girls! Jaysus that’s a lot I reckon about 60
Uhh, more than that. I've had 50 and I'm not even famous
It would be better if in chronological order.
Why is this narrated by a whispering spanish accented man?Its super obnoxious.I'm just enjoying the pictures.I really can't listen to this absurdly narrated video.
A dark haired girl.. a bit more sophisticated 😂 that sounded funny.
I’m wondering how many children Paul really has 😲
More than Stella...
@@cptgulliver well duh 😂 that we know of, there’s Stella, Mary, James, Heather and Beatrice. possibly more…
@@yes-sk6xh Heather is his adoptive child not biological.
@@martabeatriz6896 no she’s not
@@yes-sk6xh heather is the daughter of Linda from her previous marriage.
remove background music and then take the marbles out of your mouth. not worth my time.
I agree.
3:27 - That has to be one of my favorite John and Paul stories. Shows how close they were as friends. Paul could see through John's exterior.
John and Paul build The BEATLES and they were so famous for their Music. No problem with their private life. Now Sir McCartney is old and very rich. Good retirement for him. All I'm still interested with ? Their legacy through their albums. One of my favorite is The White Album. The older they were, the greatest their Music was more amazing
Narrator is horrible
Sir McCartney is not Paul McCartney (1942-1966)
@@nadiachristiansen7599Paul has the same scar on his lip to this day since his famous ***December 26th 1965 moped accident*** which has naturally changed over a lifetime.
A plastic surgeon would have had cut deep and rip open "Faul's lip in 1966 and we know that didn't happen as we would've noticed how deep and fresh it was. Like it was in 1965 again. Placing scars on lips to last a lifetime which changes over time (which it did) is not like putting on a never changing Lego piece. Lol.
And there is the little matter of your so called lookalike who needed plastic surgery to look more like Paul (according to all the varying logistically impossible fantasies) yet somehow has a son James in 1977 with the***same droopy eyes, raised eyebrows and exact chin as 1963 Paul***And then when James becomes an older man is a doppelganger to Paul's brother Michael. Lol.
Oh and Paul's ***"Granny"*** music as John liked to call it picks up at times in the 70s. His dad's music hall influences growing up (he even records his dad's only doing and gives it to him in the 70's as a present). His dad at Paul's 1969 small private wedding. Michael and Paul way in the background going to lunch not even knowing they are in the shot in Get Back, bought his Scottish farm on June 17th 1966, etc.
====
He only got better at bass from 1966 onward because the times and music called for more complicated riffs.
And you are comparing a baby fat Paul at 22 to a Paul with no baby fat in his mid then to late 20s. Also his style and facial hair changed as so did the rest of our culture did in 66 onward.
And saying Paul is shorter than Faul is borderline retarded. Every single photo that those tin foil hat sites bring forward are forced perspective illusion photos which is a natural phenomenon when people are standing beside each other and one is standing slightly in front of each other. Take a photography course sometime as it happens every day.
These tinfoil hat sites are fraudulent on purpose with the sole purpose of convincing the easily fooled that everyone else are the unthinking sheep.
You go into these sites and think you are doing research. Go learn about the Beatles. Listen to their music. There is no difference in his voice nor his creative voice and musical ability other than growing exponentially between 1962 and 1970.
John and Paul might have started, but didn't build The Beatles; others did.
@@SuperNevile John hated when people said that. In his audio Rolling Stone 1970 interview he got more than slightly upset about it. Check it out if you haven't already. He was saying George Martin gives himself way too much credit and was mad about it. Insisting it was mostly him and Paul.
I agree with you though. They were too young for some of those arrangements. In the early years especially. But by the last two albums Glynn Johns and George Martin literally just stood there waiting to press the record button while they awaited Paul's go ahead. Lol. But maybe that's why they needed Spector to clean it all up.
Is the Sandra Cohan part correct,the Beatles hardly spent anytime in London before they made it big,and Love Me Do,though attempted in June was only recorded and decided upon as the single less than a month before its release,they weren’t waiting months for its release.
Once they made it, they spent no time in Liverpool .............
What exactly was the meaning of the word Japtard back then? You said Paul wrote a note referring to Yoko Ono as a Japtard. I've googled and tried to find an older definition of the word but failed.
Combination of the words Japanese and retarded. Yoko is Japanese. There ya go.
Yoko was a witch. John did everything she wanted. Didn't let Julian almost anything. Julian forgive her. He is a great person.
@@ladyy9085 Yoko was John's wife. he loved her. Grow up, and get over it.
@@Mozart1220 John was married when Yoko appeared. She agreed to go yo Cynthia and John's home when she was out and she wear her bedcloth. The fault was John's, and I don't have any problem for them, but still think she was evil.
Its "Jap tart". Both are derogatory or dismissive words. Japanese (but as a slur, it would have been a greater slur in America at that time period) and Woman (but as a slur, it's more dismissive than insulting)
The quote comes from Francie Schwartz , she told the story when Paul and her broke up. It is not particularly reliable as she is the only person who remembers this and descriptions of her relationship with Paul is that it was a bad relationship that ended badly. She is very defense of Yoko and remains a supporter and friend to her. Something may have happened, but Francie has motive to exhagerate and there is no supporting evidence.
Wow, and Beatle fans say John was the worst 🙀
he was
Paul never hit any of his wives or girlfriends and pretty much raised John’s first kid AND adopted his first wife’s child as his own. John IS the worst and Paul is definitely the best out of all of them lol
@@mildred298 Thank you for these kind words about Paul McCartney.
It's a bit silly to say any of them are the worst, how judgmental. But also, John and George (and probably Ringo) were just as unfaithful, causing many problems and hurt feelings with their gfs and wives.
You have done some amazing research here - great job! I think Maggie was Paul's most beautiful secret girlfriend!
I cant figure out how paul loved jane?? if he was so mischivous And too faced with him
I like you Paul
I like Paul too and it's so sad that he died that November night in 1966💔
@@nadiachristiansen7599Paul has the same scar on his lip to this day since his famous ***December 26th 1965 moped accident*** which has naturally changed over a lifetime.
A plastic surgeon would have had cut deep and rip open "Faul's lip in 1966 and we know that didn't happen as we would've noticed how deep and fresh it was. Like it was in 1965 again. Placing scars on lips to last a lifetime which changes over time (which it did) is not like putting on a never changing Lego piece. Lol.
And there is the little matter of your so called lookalike who needed plastic surgery to look more like Paul (according to all the varying logistically impossible fantasies) yet somehow has a son James in 1977 with the***same droopy eyes, raised eyebrows and exact chin as 1963 Paul***And then when James becomes an older man is a doppelganger to Paul's brother Michael. Lol.
Oh and Paul's ***"Granny"*** music as John liked to call it picks up at times in the 70s. His dad's music hall influences growing up (he even records his dad's only doing and gives it to him in the 70's as a present). His dad at Paul's 1969 small private wedding. Michael and Paul way in the background going to lunch not even knowing they are in the shot in Get Back, bought his Scottish farm on June 17th 1966, etc.
====
He only got better at bass from 1966 onward because the times and music called for more complicated riffs.
And you are comparing a baby fat Paul at 22 to a Paul with no baby fat in his mid then to late 20s. Also his style and facial hair changed as so did the rest of our culture did in 66 onward.
And saying Paul is shorter than Faul is borderline retarded. Every single photo that those tin foil hat sites bring forward are forced perspective illusion photos which is a natural phenomenon when people are standing beside each other and one is standing slightly in front of each other. Take a photography course sometime as it happens every day.
These tinfoil hat sites are fraudulent on purpose with the sole purpose of convincing the easily fooled that everyone else are the unthinking sheep.
You go into these sites and think you are doing research. Go learn about the Beatles. Listen to their music. There is no difference in his voice nor his creative voice and musical ability other than growing exponentially between 1962 and 1970.
monotone
17:50 Maggie McGivern mentioned on pages 331-332 in Beatles '66 by Steve Turner.
Expensive....
5 pounds a week?
Now , the girl with the squinty eyes Dot Rhodes. That is who John Hailday is still married to today. Coincidences in their world happens too often. If I wasn’t 100% certain he was biological Paul. I wouldn’t post . Glad he’s not dead. He has referred to himself as John and laughed about it on a few occasions if you search on line . He just retired very young , or was ordered with the other 3 Beatles to leave . Great stuff!!
She did not look very pretty. Imagine if she had not miscarried. He would have felt obliged to marry her, and it would have been another Cyn and John. Him wanting to make it in the world, and this woman and kid always in the background, spoiling it for him. Paul had a lucky escape.
Who had more biological Paul, or Billy Shepherd ?
Billy only because he did not die in 1966.
@@jenniferw4068 Paul McCartney didn;t die in 1966. He is still very much alive.
@@Mozart1220 Billy is alive. Few know if James Paul is alive or dead. He had major health problems.
@@Mozart1220I know you are imagining. We all want my precious Paul back, and I cry when I think of how his tragic death happened in 66💔💔💔
Paul has the same scar on his lip to this day since his famous ***December 26th 1965 moped accident*** which has naturally changed over a lifetime.
A plastic surgeon would have had cut deep and rip open "Faul's lip in 1966 and we know that didn't happen as we would've noticed how deep and fresh it was. Like it was in 1965 again. Placing scars on lips to last a lifetime which changes over time (which it did) is not like putting on a never changing Lego piece. Lol.
And there is the little matter of your so called lookalike who needed plastic surgery to look more like Paul (according to all the varying logistically impossible fantasies) yet somehow has a son James in 1977 with the***same droopy eyes, raised eyebrows and exact chin as 1963 Paul***And then when James becomes an older man is a doppelganger to Paul's brother Michael. Lol.
Oh and Paul's ***"Granny"*** music as John liked to call it picks up at times in the 70s. His dad's music hall influences growing up (he even records his dad's only doing and gives it to him in the 70's as a present). His dad at Paul's 1969 small private wedding. Michael and Paul way in the background going to lunch not even knowing they are in the shot in Get Back, bought his Scottish farm on June 17th 1966, etc.
====
He only got better at bass from 1966 onward because the times and music called for more complicated riffs.
And you are comparing a baby fat Paul at 22 to a Paul with no baby fat in his mid then to late 20s. Also his style and facial hair changed as so did the rest of our culture did in 66 onward.
And saying Paul is shorter than Faul is borderline retarded. Every single photo that those tin foil hat sites bring forward are forced perspective illusion photos which is a natural phenomenon when people are standing beside each other and one is standing slightly in front of each other. Take a photography course sometime as it happens every day.
These tinfoil hat sites are fraudulent on purpose with the sole purpose of convincing the easily fooled that everyone else are the unthinking sheep.
You go into these sites and think you are doing research. Go learn about the Beatles. Listen to their music. There is no difference in his voice nor his creative voice and musical ability other than growing exponentially between 1962 and 1970.
Hard to understand commentator with the thick accent and the annoying elevator looping lounge music.
Paul was young- he had pick of the litter. Linda had esquitarian knowledge. She didn't break in the Bucking Bronco Rider. They were mutually meant to be.
Mate, why have you got the background music so loud? Do you not like the sound of your own voice or something?
pleaseeee turn off the background music and have subtitles cause I can’t understand a word you’re saying
Sure had plenty, so I think so!
Faul mccartneys blood type was different poor girl
Paul has the same scar on his lip to this day since his famous ***December 26th 1965 moped accident*** which has naturally changed over a lifetime.
A plastic surgeon would have had cut deep and rip open "Faul's lip in 1966 and we know that didn't happen as we would've noticed how deep and fresh it was. Like it was in 1965 again. Placing scars on lips to last a lifetime which changes over time (which it did) is not like putting on a never changing Lego piece. Lol.
And there is the little matter of your so called lookalike who needed plastic surgery to look more like Paul (according to all the varying logistically impossible fantasies) yet somehow has a son James in 1977 with the***same droopy eyes, raised eyebrows and exact chin as 1963 Paul***And then when James becomes an older man is a doppelganger to Paul's brother Michael. Lol.
Oh and Paul's ***"Granny"*** music as John liked to call it picks up at times in the 70s. His dad's music hall influences growing up (he even records his dad's only doing and gives it to him in the 70's as a present). His dad at Paul's 1969 small private wedding. Michael and Paul way in the background going to lunch not even knowing they are in the shot in Get Back, bought his Scottish farm on June 17th 1966, etc.
====
He only got better at bass from 1966 onward because the times and music called for more complicated riffs.
And you are comparing a baby fat Paul at 22 to a Paul with no baby fat in his mid then to late 20s. Also his style and facial hair changed as so did the rest of our culture did in 66 onward.
And saying Paul is shorter than Faul is borderline retarded. Every single photo that those tin foil hat sites bring forward are forced perspective illusion photos which is a natural phenomenon when people are standing beside each other and one is standing slightly in front of each other. Take a photography course sometime as it happens every day.
These tinfoil hat sites are fraudulent on purpose with the sole purpose of convincing the easily fooled that everyone else are the unthinking sheep.
You go into these sites and think you are doing research. Go learn about the Beatles. Listen to their music. There is no difference in his voice nor his creative voice and musical ability other than growing exponentially between 1962 and 1970.
very good but ... ¿actrees Peggy Lee?
Jane Asher Dated Paul for 5 years& was Engaged to Him
Paul LOVES S t r o n g Women
♥️🌟💙🇬🇧🇬🇧🎼🎶🎵
Thanks they split jane deserve better ilove paul
Until he died in 1966 and was replaced with Vivian Campbell
@@nadiachristiansen7599Paul has the same scar on his lip to this day since his famous ***December 26th 1965 moped accident*** which has naturally changed over a lifetime.
A plastic surgeon would have had cut deep and rip open "Faul's lip in 1966 and we know that didn't happen as we would've noticed how deep and fresh it was. Like it was in 1965 again. Placing scars on lips to last a lifetime which changes over time (which it did) is not like putting on a never changing Lego piece. Lol.
And there is the little matter of your so called lookalike who needed plastic surgery to look more like Paul (according to all the varying logistically impossible fantasies) yet somehow has a son James in 1977 with the***same droopy eyes, raised eyebrows and exact chin as 1963 Paul***And then when James becomes an older man is a doppelganger to Paul's brother Michael. Lol.
Oh and Paul's ***"Granny"*** music as John liked to call it picks up at times in the 70s. His dad's music hall influences growing up (he even records his dad's only doing and gives it to him in the 70's as a present). His dad at Paul's 1969 small private wedding. Michael and Paul way in the background going to lunch not even knowing they are in the shot in Get Back, bought his Scottish farm on June 17th 1966, etc.
====
He only got better at bass from 1966 onward because the times and music called for more complicated riffs.
And you are comparing a baby fat Paul at 22 to a Paul with no baby fat in his mid then to late 20s. Also his style and facial hair changed as so did the rest of our culture did in 66 onward.
And saying Paul is shorter than Faul is borderline retarded. Every single photo that those tin foil hat sites bring forward are forced perspective illusion photos which is a natural phenomenon when people are standing beside each other and one is standing slightly in front of each other. Take a photography course sometime as it happens every day.
These tinfoil hat sites are fraudulent on purpose with the sole purpose of convincing the easily fooled that everyone else are the unthinking sheep.
You go into these sites and think you are doing research. Go learn about the Beatles. Listen to their music. There is no difference in his voice nor his creative voice and musical ability other than growing exponentially between 1962 and 1970.
Hallo,Herr Paul war 24!!! Was für ein moralische Entrüstung, Weiler viele Frauen hatte...pfft
Corps is pronounced "core".
How anyone thinks Paul 62-66 is the same guy as 67-72, please look again real close , listen to them talk, watch how they play the bass and most of all, compare the voices on old Beatles songs. Different person . Billy Shears
That's right. He died in 1966 and was replaced with John Halliday (also known as William Stanshall or Billy Shears)
Paul has the same scar on his lip to this day since his famous ***December 26th 1965 moped accident*** which has naturally changed over a lifetime.
A plastic surgeon would have had cut deep and rip open "Faul's lip in 1966 and we know that didn't happen as we would've noticed how deep and fresh it was. Like it was in 1965 again. Placing scars on lips to last a lifetime which changes over time (which it did) is not like putting on a never changing Lego piece. Lol.
And there is the little matter of your so called lookalike who needed plastic surgery to look more like Paul (according to all the varying logistically impossible fantasies) yet somehow has a son James in 1977 with the***same droopy eyes, raised eyebrows and exact chin as 1963 Paul***And then when James becomes an older man is a doppelganger to Paul's brother Michael. Lol.
Oh and Paul's ***"Granny"*** music as John liked to call it picks up at times in the 70s. His dad's music hall influences growing up (he even records his dad's only doing and gives it to him in the 70's as a present). His dad at Paul's 1969 small private wedding. Michael and Paul way in the background going to lunch not even knowing they are in the shot in Get Back, bought his Scottish farm on June 17th 1966, etc.
====
He only got better at bass from 1966 onward because the times and music called for more complicated riffs.
And you are comparing a baby fat Paul at 22 to a Paul with no baby fat in his mid then to late 20s. Also his style and facial hair changed as so did the rest of our culture did in 66 onward.
And saying Paul is shorter than Faul is borderline retarded. Every single photo that those tin foil hat sites bring forward are forced perspective illusion photos which is a natural phenomenon when people are standing beside each other and one is standing slightly in front of each other. Take a photography course sometime as it happens every day.
These tinfoil hat sites are fraudulent on purpose with the sole purpose of convincing the easily fooled that everyone else are the unthinking sheep.
You go into these sites and think you are doing research. Go learn about the Beatles. Listen to their music. There is no difference in his voice nor his creative voice and musical ability other than growing exponentially between 1962 and 1970.
Wrong!!!
TELL THEM❤ REST IN PEACE JAMES PAUL MCCARTNEY
@@McCartney81 the world loves a clown cheer down -george harrison
Francie Schwartz
Maggi mccgiver que fue ella en la vida fr paul?
Wasn't Paul McCartney killed by fan?
Yeah. He picked up a girl named Rita that night he had an argument with the other 3 Beatles and he had yelled and screamed at John and told Brian Epstein to shut up. Now Rita had realised who he was and she couldn't resist but hug and kiss Paul which made Paul lose control of his vehicle and it crashed.
It happened in 1966
Paul has the same scar on his lip to this day since his famous ***December 26th 1965 moped accident*** which has naturally changed over a lifetime.
A plastic surgeon would have had cut deep and rip open "Faul's lip in 1966 and we know that didn't happen as we would've noticed how deep and fresh it was. Like it was in 1965 again. Placing scars on lips to last a lifetime which changes over time (which it did) is not like putting on a never changing Lego piece. Lol.
And there is the little matter of your so called lookalike who needed plastic surgery to look more like Paul (according to all the varying logistically impossible fantasies) yet somehow has a son James in 1977 with the***same droopy eyes, raised eyebrows and exact chin as 1963 Paul***And then when James becomes an older man is a doppelganger to Paul's brother Michael. Lol.
Oh and Paul's ***"Granny"*** music as John liked to call it picks up at times in the 70s. His dad's music hall influences growing up (he even records his dad's only doing and gives it to him in the 70's as a present). His dad at Paul's 1969 small private wedding. Michael and Paul way in the background going to lunch not even knowing they are in the shot in Get Back, bought his Scottish farm on June 17th 1966, etc.
====
He only got better at bass from 1966 onward because the times and music called for more complicated riffs.
And you are comparing a baby fat Paul at 22 to a Paul with no baby fat in his mid then to late 20s. Also his style and facial hair changed as so did the rest of our culture did in 66 onward.
And saying Paul is shorter than Faul is borderline retarded. Every single photo that those tin foil hat sites bring forward are forced perspective illusion photos which is a natural phenomenon when people are standing beside each other and one is standing slightly in front of each other. Take a photography course sometime as it happens every day.
These tinfoil hat sites are fraudulent on purpose with the sole purpose of convincing the easily fooled that everyone else are the unthinking sheep.
You go into these sites and think you are doing research. Go learn about the Beatles. Listen to their music. There is no difference in his voice nor his creative voice and musical ability other than growing exponentially between 1962 and 1970.
There is a photo of the Beatles travelling (I believe it was on a ferry) that has in-frame, Paul McCartney and Jane Asher - and a bit further away, sitting next to each other was Paul's double William Shears Campbell chatting with the photographer, Linda Eastman. The latter two went on to form the band Wings.
Please tell me you're joking
@@christrontherobot4100 nope. Billy was also in photos in February 1964 in the USA with Paul and George in front of him. Billy took over the Paul part when Paul died.
@@jenniferw4068 LOL. Get well soon. Sir Paul McCartney is alive and well. Stop buying the BS from a JOKE started by a Detroit DJ.
@@Mozart1220Well there are actually two Faul's really. After Paul's death in 1966 Billy Shears took over. He earned to make Sgt Pepper and Magical Mystery Tour. After the India trip where they tried to transfer Paul's soul into Billy's body so Billy Shears' soul and failed, they returned to London to work on their next album that would be White Album. Here, Billy got into some arguments with John and one of the days, they spent some hours taking pictures in parks and streets in London, that's the sessions known as The Beatles Mad Day Out. There, John planned to get rid of Billy. He had discussed it with George and Ringo. The band was standing on a rooftop, where Billy was standing at the edge. As the photographer began to shoot John pushed Billy over the edge and Billy Shears was history. They found a second Paul-look-a-like who was now to replace both Paul McCartney (1942-1966) and Billy Shears (1937-1968). His name was William Campbell and he had to continue Billy's projects.
Justice for Billy Shears. You just wanted to do your job and finish what Paul McCartney started. John how could you
@@nadiachristiansen7599don't do drugs kids
Some of them were Billys
Paul has the same scar on his lip to this day since his famous ***December 26th 1965 moped accident*** which has naturally changed over a lifetime.
A plastic surgeon would have had cut deep and rip open "Faul's lip in 1966 and we know that didn't happen as we would've noticed how deep and fresh it was. Like it was in 1965 again. Placing scars on lips to last a lifetime which changes over time (which it did) is not like putting on a never changing Lego piece. Lol.
And there is the little matter of your so called lookalike who needed plastic surgery to look more like Paul (according to all the varying logistically impossible fantasies) yet somehow has a son James in 1977 with the***same droopy eyes, raised eyebrows and exact chin as 1963 Paul***And then when James becomes an older man is a doppelganger to Paul's brother Michael. Lol.
Oh and Paul's ***"Granny"*** music as John liked to call it picks up at times in the 70s. His dad's music hall influences growing up (he even records his dad's only doing and gives it to him in the 70's as a present). His dad at Paul's 1969 small private wedding. Michael and Paul way in the background going to lunch not even knowing they are in the shot in Get Back, bought his Scottish farm on June 17th 1966, etc.
====
He only got better at bass from 1966 onward because the times and music called for more complicated riffs.
And you are comparing a baby fat Paul at 22 to a Paul with no baby fat in his mid then to late 20s. Also his style and facial hair changed as so did the rest of our culture did in 66 onward.
And saying Paul is shorter than Faul is borderline retarded. Every single photo that those tin foil hat sites bring forward are forced perspective illusion photos which is a natural phenomenon when people are standing beside each other and one is standing slightly in front of each other. Take a photography course sometime as it happens every day.
These tinfoil hat sites are fraudulent on purpose with the sole purpose of convincing the easily fooled that everyone else are the unthinking sheep.
You go into these sites and think you are doing research. Go learn about the Beatles. Listen to their music. There is no difference in his voice nor his creative voice and musical ability other than growing exponentially between 1962 and 1970.
You need to distinguish between Paul McCartney and Billy Shears. Paul was a man with moral principles, Billy was and is a guy without any.
Noch so ein Idiot. Lassen Sie sich ei liefern, wenn Sie weiter so einen Schwachsinn verbreiten. Das tut ja weh.
Maccas bints