Video 1: Is Meghan The Mother? Prove It!!!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 кві 2024
  • Finn's Channel: / @finnslife-nz3mp
    Patreon: www.patreon.com/user?u=715023...
    Daddy's Book: a.co/d/5CqZ1xX
    Alcohol/coffee fund: www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_...
    Twitter Name: Longsally aka Sue Smith
    Gettr Name; Longsally
    Rumble Name: SueSmithAKALongsally
    Email: Suesmith1112@yahoo.com
    Amazon Wish List: www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls...
    Sue Smith
    655 H Fairview Rd
    PMB # 103
    Simpsonville, SC 29680
    #godsavetheking #kingcharles #queencamilla #meghanmarkle #princeharry #liars #grifters #bully #fakepregnancy. #babybump #surrogate
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 964

  • @deb53
    @deb53 Місяць тому +231

    I am glad that the cries for the removal of Archie and Lilibet from the lines of succession are getting louder until Markle can prove beyond a shadow of doubt that both children were born of her body!

    • @Shakespearelover1717
      @Shakespearelover1717 Місяць тому +21

      And that the fertilized egg was hers!!!

    • @ABC1701A
      @ABC1701A Місяць тому

      Why bother, THEY WILL NEVER BE CLOSE TO THE TOP OF THE LIST, and as has been stated more than once, neither HARRY, ARCHIE OR LILI WILL NEVER BE MONARCH so who cares. The ONLY ones who need to know the truth are the royal family, high up members of the govt and the security services and they do (or so my source tells me, even down to the security services of the realms.

    • @jenniferloo9808
      @jenniferloo9808 Місяць тому

      It will be such a joke and uneding laughs by the whole world when its proved that she really fake her pregnancy in all th videos we see. What a crazy bat mm is. How stupid and shameless to be such a known fraud!

  • @LadyElizabethPrimRose
    @LadyElizabethPrimRose Місяць тому +209

    If Princess Catherine had to be forced to make a statement on her health while she was healing, then Rachel needed to do the same. What's good for the goose.

    • @antheavogel9335
      @antheavogel9335 Місяць тому +27

      Absolutely 💯 🇬🇧

    • @mauricesavel5110
      @mauricesavel5110 Місяць тому +21

      SPOT ON!

    • @madmelwood3778
      @madmelwood3778 Місяць тому +18

      100% agree

    • @ABC1701A
      @ABC1701A Місяць тому +9

      Couple of points. Catherine made a statement to explain why she WOULDN'T be back working after Easter, she stated the reason and that was all she said. She couldn't disappear from public for months on end without giving an explanation and even though the public KNEW she had had abdominal surgery and wouldn't be working it didn't stop the US media/social media/some nasty minded UA-camrs - looking at you Angela Levin, Piers Morgan and Dan Wootton in particular - from coming up with all types of fantastical reasons as to why she was in hospital and NONE involved normal abdominal surgery and an 8-10 week recovery period. People were calling for a police investigatIon BECAUSE SHE HAD SURGERY AND NEEDED TO RECOVER FROM IT for pete's sake. There is a slight difference between the Princess of Wales being deliberately hounded and bullied for daring to need surgery needing to explain why she would be disappearing from the public gaze for what could be the better part of the year and some seppo b**t who may or may not have needed to use padding during pregnancy (but boy, did it ever get her talked about which was probably the whole point of the exercise) and whose stupid husband is unable to tell the truth if it was staring him in the face about 2 kids who will NEVER be any closer to the throne than they currently are and who receive NO public funding of any kind from anyone needing to explain why her obsessive need to always be on the front pages made her act in a way that would guarantee just that.

    • @sparkypete3417
      @sparkypete3417 Місяць тому

      Didn't "Lilly's" doctor shut up shop and disappeared after that birth? And the husband was also an IVF doctor? Lots of smoke and mirrors with the con artists!!🤔

  • @umakilsby1379
    @umakilsby1379 Місяць тому +174

    Those babies did NOT come out of Megsy's vjayjay! She has got to be WORST actress and BIGGEST liar there is. "Eating tacos while in labour" just one example I can remember. There's too many inconsistencies it's mind boggling. Karma hurry up!

  • @VelvetJo0909
    @VelvetJo0909 Місяць тому +295

    About time the demand grew louder. As Meg has stated WE HAVE A VOICE but she keeps trying her best to silence.

    • @Agnar669
      @Agnar669 Місяць тому +21

      True, and the transparency, and legitimacy, of the Line of Succession matters...Otherwise anyone can jump into it....stick the dogs in as well, for good measure.

    • @betht60
      @betht60 Місяць тому +10

      ​@@Agnar669Hahaahaaa, I'm surprised ol' MeeMee didn't try to add Guy the Beagle into the Line of Succession.

  • @shirleysutton4937
    @shirleysutton4937 Місяць тому +434

    We don't feed mother's here either, he talked rubbish. There's no way he'd have access to laughing gas here either

    • @katherinehennessyhunt5331
      @katherinehennessyhunt5331 Місяць тому +47

      He said they had a Nandos takeout, they don't open 24 hours, & certainly not at 3ish in the morning..🤥😅🤣🤣🤣

    • @hanginlaundry360
      @hanginlaundry360 Місяць тому

      ...and if the outlandish BS about the Nitrous Oxide and bouncing on a ball were true, what a total loser!!!!

    • @carolyndymond4065
      @carolyndymond4065 Місяць тому +10

      ​@katherinehennessyhunt5331 they might for a prince 200 quid 😂😂

    • @junescoular292
      @junescoular292 Місяць тому +19

      ​@@carolyndymond4065The proprietors would have to be woken up especially if they lived on the premises. Besides, what Mother feels like eating when hours away from delivery. Or an epidural for that matter. I remember telling the nurse/midwife that I felt sick during delivery. But luckily, I wasn't.

    • @cindybryant1584
      @cindybryant1584 Місяць тому +24

      There are just too many unbelievable stories, photos, and unknowns to have this birth be verifiable.

  • @susanhayes9284
    @susanhayes9284 Місяць тому +270

    She is the biggest con artist

    • @martham4356
      @martham4356 Місяць тому +26

      Absolutely, she is a malicious con artist and a pathological liar.

    • @islanddiva3813
      @islanddiva3813 Місяць тому +11

      And a stupid one at that!

    • @leslieking6259
      @leslieking6259 Місяць тому +14

      In Meghan's own words..."I'm such a fraud".

    • @dawnjohnson5937
      @dawnjohnson5937 Місяць тому +6

      And Harry

  • @RainbowPyramid
    @RainbowPyramid Місяць тому +298

    Also when they first showed Archie at 2 days old Harry said the baby changed so much in 2 WEEKS 😂😂😂

    • @JoRN1222
      @JoRN1222 Місяць тому +29

      He is such a dunce.😅

    • @jillruben8924
      @jillruben8924 Місяць тому +17

      I’ve been commenting the same for over a year to no avail.
      IMO this should be addressed ASAP.
      His words not rumors.

    • @kellyfalletta1949
      @kellyfalletta1949 Місяць тому +3

      Exactly.

  • @karenturner7184
    @karenturner7184 Місяць тому +98

    If these children are being part of the LoS then there is a legal case to know the truth of birth. If not of royal body, they are not royal

  • @SelinaBarton-ij5iz
    @SelinaBarton-ij5iz Місяць тому +195

    If Roache had birthed both Archieficial and Invisibilily we wouldn't have heard the last of it, from the time of conception to the time she gave birth. She doesn't shut up about everything else she talks about, yet the one thing she didn't talk about was her pregnancies.

    • @jeanettenorman7052
      @jeanettenorman7052 Місяць тому +14

      Good point.

    • @LeeDon76
      @LeeDon76 Місяць тому +16

      Or her labour

    • @jennyfairbairn2525
      @jennyfairbairn2525 Місяць тому +33

      Exactly. Yet she still dines out on the dishwashing liquid story. Highly suspicious.

    • @Jannie-
      @Jannie- Місяць тому +21

      Meghan awkwardly replied “The little ones are still little “ and Harry arrogantly replied
      “That’s confidential”after being asked individually (on two different occasions) a simple inquiring question about their kids.
      It’s so very obvious that they’re not parents .

    • @betht60
      @betht60 Місяць тому +15

      ​@@Jannie-And if they are, they are the ODDEST parents ever!!

  • @pamelalipscomb8332
    @pamelalipscomb8332 Місяць тому +184

    The palace should have taken care of this long ago. It is in their best interest to make sure that they and their citizens have confidence in the line of succession being legitimate.

    • @betht60
      @betht60 Місяць тому +4

      I believe that Prince Philip's last illness and death, along with the Late Queen's illness, made taking on such an earthshaking problem extremely difficult at the time. Plus, as Lady C has said many times in the past, all children, no matter how they came to be, have rights of their own. Children who are born from surrogates and/or are adopted must not have their information compromised. Their identities are strictly protected.

    • @cphoenix8592
      @cphoenix8592 Місяць тому

      Unfortunately she will call the RF racist if they demanded DNA results

    • @dawnjohnson5937
      @dawnjohnson5937 Місяць тому +6

      @@betht60 Their personal information does not have to be exposed. They simply need to be removed from the LOS, with a statement like: the children do not fulfil all the legal requirements to be on the LOS. The situation will be reviewed in a year's time.

    • @pamelalipscomb8332
      @pamelalipscomb8332 Місяць тому +1

      They have no more privacy rights than any other of the royal children. We already know their names. It is the manner of their births that is at issue. If this were a normal, nonroyal child, that wouldn’t likely be important. However, as long as Meg and Haz want their children titled and in the LOS, then they need to prove that they have a legitimate right to be there. If they want to remove them from the LOS since they plan to keep them away from the UK, then they can keep all of their birth details as secret as they wish.

  • @Isogotit
    @Isogotit Місяць тому +464

    We need to all sign a petition demanding DNA test for those children. I personally don’t think Meg was ever pregnant. It’s all one big fat lie because they are liars.

    • @Agnar669
      @Agnar669 Місяць тому

      Agree....nothing but lies surround both births. Of course, there has to be fraud.

    • @applesoranges100
      @applesoranges100 Місяць тому +21

      It's her medical file holds all the info.

    • @collettemilligan604
      @collettemilligan604 Місяць тому +17

      His more likely to be the mother than this ones wife.

    • @virginiarp3sm7
      @virginiarp3sm7 Місяць тому +19

      Pointless king Charles will just ignore the petition.

    • @louisech1963
      @louisech1963 Місяць тому +34

      We need a confirmation that she gave birth

  • @maevew1
    @maevew1 Місяць тому +317

    Please..... really Meghan gives up an opportunity to stand outside the hospital for a photos.....really
    Only reason no photo was no real delivery

    • @fionahall3900
      @fionahall3900 Місяць тому +22

      I just said the same thing 😊

    • @karenpeel8520
      @karenpeel8520 Місяць тому +25

      Totally agree

    • @nancydrew1102
      @nancydrew1102 Місяць тому +24

      @@karenpeel8520 No way she’d miss the paps twice, she’d also have talked non stop about the birth stories & be writing a pregnancy book like ever other wanna be celebrity !
      Think KC3 should clear this nonsense out before 👑 William , after all it’s Charles is the father who never makes them accountable for their bad behaviour!

    • @barbaracurtis1398
      @barbaracurtis1398 Місяць тому +8

      I agree with you and others..... that woman would never give up the chance to be the center of attention. It will all come out in the future because people are now becoming very aware of the lies those have told which number probably in the hundreds!!!

    • @madmelwood3778
      @madmelwood3778 Місяць тому

      😂😂😂yep..cos she will be photographed regularly in a car park

  • @avissmith8384
    @avissmith8384 Місяць тому +194

    All kids titles should be taken away untill DNA tests done on both and we all know the truth. Must be done with law official in attendance❤

    • @lavander63859
      @lavander63859 Місяць тому +50

      It is not just DNA proof. It’s proof that she delivered those babies.

    • @debrarobinson57
      @debrarobinson57 Місяць тому

      It's not just the DNA that is needed, it's proof that MM carried those 'children' & that they were of her body - so her eggs, delivered from her body, with witnesses. That is what we are entitled to know. Entitled by law to know - not just from curiosity. Even if a surrogate carried their biological child, that child is excluded from the LoS because it has to be born from the mother, the legal spouse of the Prince .

    • @helengunter378
      @helengunter378 Місяць тому

      @@lavander63859Exactly

    • @karenpeel8520
      @karenpeel8520 Місяць тому +18

      Exactly right....

    • @aos8585
      @aos8585 Місяць тому

      @@lavander63859 it is both. We need to know that child is OF her body and FROM her body to be in the line of succession.

  • @yvonnefurze86
    @yvonnefurze86 Місяць тому +114

    The nonsense was created by the two idiots.

    • @jeanettenorman7052
      @jeanettenorman7052 Місяць тому

      Yep idiots. Court Joker is old Hazbeen?

    • @TDAEON
      @TDAEON Місяць тому +1

      Truth! Totally their dumpster fire.

  • @shirleysutton4937
    @shirleysutton4937 Місяць тому +184

    Don't forget they edited the Queen and Philip in on the christening photo.

    • @traceybott7744
      @traceybott7744 Місяць тому +19

      Yes they did , that photo was taken at the Royal Sandringham Stud of the Queen and Prince Philip they were looking at a bay mare and her foal NOT that child, the original photo was in the Horse and Hound magazine. FACT.

    • @kittycat4900
      @kittycat4900 Місяць тому +7

      They did that but it was not on the christening photo. The Queen and Philip did not go to the fake christening.

    • @princessdumbarton9877
      @princessdumbarton9877 Місяць тому +3

      @@traceybott7744 It was from the Windsor horse show the previous year.

    • @5h7va
      @5h7va Місяць тому +4

      Yes there is no way our late Queen would don on some cardie for an official photo. The couple are so brazen enough is enough strip them off titles and kick them to the kerb

    • @eedie-mr1ey
      @eedie-mr1ey 29 днів тому +1

      My goodness; they are really brazen if they had the gall to photoshop QE2 and PP into their fake baby photo. There must be repercussions

  • @rodriguecallas8260
    @rodriguecallas8260 Місяць тому +69

    I must say it very strange how Meghan, at her age plus way past 7 months pregnant, was able to squat all the way down to the floor with both legs closed to each other.
    I don't think any 7 months pregnant 20 year old would be able to bend down like that. It's hard to take the Sussex couple seriously in anything they say or do.

  • @thoughtsofwisdom1223
    @thoughtsofwisdom1223 Місяць тому +64

    What Harry the handbag and Megaliar are doing is totally disrespectful and disgusting. The palace needs to take a stand and remove them from the line of succession. This type of behavior has no place in the royal family and Prince Harry should be ashamed of himself for getting involved with a con artist like this. It's time for the King to step in before any more damage is done.

    • @lindaanderson4990
      @lindaanderson4990 Місяць тому

      Since they are in the line of succession it's fraud...should be a criminal matter. Birth certificates altered? Hmmmm.

    • @terrytrammell7388
      @terrytrammell7388 Місяць тому

      Harry is as big a con artist as Megan is. Both are grifters and liars.

    • @donnacrowell7061
      @donnacrowell7061 Місяць тому

      It's it's actually criminal to the LOS and the UK taxpayers

  • @Jannie-
    @Jannie- Місяць тому +43

    Meghan awkwardly replied “The little ones are still little “ and Harry arrogantly replied
    “That’s confidential”after being asked individually (on two different occasions) a simple inquiring question about their kids.
    It’s so very obvious that they’re not parents .

    • @katieMarie2022
      @katieMarie2022 10 днів тому

      It's not confidential, it's people showing interest that's all. Maybe it's confidential when they hide invisible children. Haggy and Handbag are 2 sick people.

  • @barbarawinterbourne3736
    @barbarawinterbourne3736 Місяць тому +284

    In my opinion she is not the mother. Allegedly.
    As tax payers we have a right to know the DNA of both children (( if they exist) If they are in line of succession. Our royalty are there because the people want it.
    We donot want a mucky past woman and the traitor younger son of our king.
    We as a democracy will never allow this pair to be working royals ever again.

    • @betht60
      @betht60 Місяць тому +10

      🎯🎯🎯 🇺🇸❤️🇬🇧

    • @suebryanwilliams8611
      @suebryanwilliams8611 Місяць тому

      There doesn't need to be a DNA Test. To be on the Line of Succession these children need to be proven to be born of Meghan's body. It's archaic, but it still stands AND it's for Meghan to prove, not for the BRF to disprove. From all the nonsense with increasing and dimiinishing Baby bumps, there are doubts. She can't prove she gave birth to any children by Harry, so the childrn can easily be removed from the Line of Succession and should be. Even if H &M kick up a fuss, who cares? The onus is on them!

    • @mlentz1975
      @mlentz1975 Місяць тому +3

      You said it!!!!! 👏👍🏼

    • @kiddsin6561
      @kiddsin6561 Місяць тому +2

      Yes but magan needs to have a reliable doctor from here give a complete internal to see if she has what it takes to have a children she's had a historecteme

    • @kiddsin6561
      @kiddsin6561 Місяць тому

      When she gets caught in a lie she blames the palace they need to remove them from the line of sucsation

  • @margaretmclennan5169
    @margaretmclennan5169 Місяць тому +118

    It was all a fake

  • @pamwhiting4890
    @pamwhiting4890 Місяць тому +77

    Lady C is not agossip monger, she is very well connected to people who know the facts . There is no doubt there is something odd about Archie and Lillie ! Knowing Megan....as we do, if those children were real.... and hers, we would be sick of seeing them! Every time we saw the Cambridge kids, Megan would trot out the Sussex kids!! Where are they ? Also she is never home would she ever recognise them?! .......would they recognise her 😂

    • @MsSparklesNGlitter
      @MsSparklesNGlitter Місяць тому +3

      Lady C also adopted her two sons so for her adoption or surrogacy isn't a problem at all. But the truth about these children needs to be told.

    • @jimbo6059
      @jimbo6059 Місяць тому +3

      Yes, Lady C does have links in the aristocratic circles in the UK, and people are telling her stuff thry want to get out thst thry would not leak, I don't think it goes as high as the king and the prince of Wales, but others.

    • @juliehilton1701
      @juliehilton1701 Місяць тому +1

      True Lady C does have connections but I think she might be a titsy bit of a gossip 😂😂

  • @elainewilliams735
    @elainewilliams735 Місяць тому +159

    My dog had more chance of giving birth to those children. 🤫

    • @Agnar669
      @Agnar669 Місяць тому +9

      Do you suspect your dog was with Harry?

    • @karenpeel8520
      @karenpeel8520 Місяць тому +9

      😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅

    • @mordrethboehm4818
      @mordrethboehm4818 Місяць тому +1

      And anyone’s dog would be more willing to be photographed on leaving the hospital than this paparazzi-whore whom we all know frequents car parks just so that she can be papped. The not-wanting-to-be-photographed-claim, from her, just doesn’t ring true. Never has; never will.

    • @elainewilliams735
      @elainewilliams735 Місяць тому +7

      @@Agnar669 She did disappear over the park for a while.🤣🤣

    • @Agnar669
      @Agnar669 Місяць тому

      @@elainewilliams735

  • @RavenNl403
    @RavenNl403 Місяць тому +78

    Nothing surprises me with these two

  • @itsreallyme-it7zj
    @itsreallyme-it7zj Місяць тому +55

    It is rumoured that MM and former husband Trevor were trying for a baby for years.
    Ironically after Trevor remarried he was blessed with two babies, and MM pregnancies surrounded in doubt.
    I guess she forgot to tell Trevor about her hysterectomy

  • @maggiemay4388
    @maggiemay4388 Місяць тому +68

    We spell labor (labour) so it was not a Buckingham Palace announcement

  • @shirleysutton4937
    @shirleysutton4937 Місяць тому +93

    Time our government got involved and did something about it

    • @terrytrammell7388
      @terrytrammell7388 Місяць тому +2

      If you are British you can petition Parliament to get to the truth about Harry’s children. Unfortunately a petition from America will do no good. If you are British call Parliament and petition Parliament to get to the truth of “Harry’s children”.

    • @nickicjackson2892
      @nickicjackson2892 Місяць тому

      @@terrytrammell7388 I have set one up, but each time I've posted where the petition is for signing, that information disappears from the forums I have posted it on! Don't know if it is something that gets flagged and taken down.

  • @MC-yi3zp
    @MC-yi3zp Місяць тому +7

    I will be writing to the Home Secretary, James Cleverley, asking for irrefutable proof that the baby was born of Megan's body.

  • @JoRN1222
    @JoRN1222 Місяць тому +29

    If I was a UK 🇬🇧 tax payer I would be demanding proof as well. I was an OB nurse and her "pregnancy " was suspect as heck imo.

  • @bettyhappschatt3467
    @bettyhappschatt3467 Місяць тому +136

    I would like to mention that ladies very often get nauseous for a while before they give birth. It is smart not to consume anything solid.

    • @susansmiles2242
      @susansmiles2242 Місяць тому +25

      Very true I was violently sick when I went into labour

    • @victoriabraham3692
      @victoriabraham3692 Місяць тому

      yep because your body is pushing everything out

    • @minihaha5367
      @minihaha5367 Місяць тому +35

      Also, hospitals don’t let mothers in labor eat lest they have to go into surgery for, say, a c-section

    • @lindabridget49
      @lindabridget49 Місяць тому +6

      I did 🤢

    • @AJA-ie5uu
      @AJA-ie5uu Місяць тому +8

      It’s absolutely fine if you’re the one waiting for the delivery. Like when the Amazon driver turns up 🫤

  • @janetrobertshaw6487
    @janetrobertshaw6487 Місяць тому +26

    I loved when they stepped out to show Archie. And she very nearly cradled her " baby bump"....then remembered she was no longer pregnant!!!!

    • @maggieswithenbank6709
      @maggieswithenbank6709 Місяць тому +8

      Yeah and who wears a WHITE dress post partum?!? She’s a bad actress who did not do any research!

  • @Casper2905
    @Casper2905 Місяць тому +50

    Good morning to you, Sue, Rachel had a hysterectomy at the age of 29, which her father Thomas
    paid for the operation. What we are looking at is a moon bump which was not tied securely to her waist
    which is why it fell down. 😮😮😮😮😮😮

  • @kathyjones7637
    @kathyjones7637 Місяць тому +54

    It’s PAST time to get TRUTH about any REAL children, THEIR children 👍🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

  • @kennahaj5137
    @kennahaj5137 Місяць тому +81

    I want the truth to come out, but we may never know. It would have been better to stay childless as this couple never spends time with the supposed children. I assume she wanted the permanent connection to the BRF by having a royal baby. But the proof of their true birth needs to be shown.

    • @franceslivingston5085
      @franceslivingston5085 Місяць тому +15

      The truth will come out sooner or later.

    • @roffen969
      @roffen969 Місяць тому +8

      The longer the palace leaves it, the worse it will be for them. Charles thought it would just all go away, allegedly, encouraged in this by his friends. What a terrible attitude exhibited towards the brain power of we of the hoi polloi

    • @tracyroose750
      @tracyroose750 Місяць тому +3

      Hi kennahaj, I love your comment. It is matter of fact, with a sprinkle of your heartfelt opinion. Well said. Hope you have a happy day. Take care.

    • @annatjienilsen539
      @annatjienilsen539 Місяць тому

      I do not understand why you want to throw Charles under the bus. The queen was in the driving seat. The fact however is that the palace put out the notice of the birth stating that it was from a surrogate. They were forced to take it down after 8 hours because of a legal injunction notice. Not even the queen can go against that. They could then take the queen to court or sued her for an exorbitant amount of money
      ​@@roffen969

    • @gillduale8020
      @gillduale8020 Місяць тому

      @@franceslivingston5085 i II

  • @leoniemusgrave9322
    @leoniemusgrave9322 Місяць тому +36

    You can’t walk if you’ve had an epidural. I know I had an epidural.

  • @occupier123
    @occupier123 Місяць тому +67

    The palace should stop covering up for these two.

    • @betht60
      @betht60 Місяць тому

      If the children's birth information was protected medical information, even the Palace couldn't just go check it out, without legal intervention. This is on HARRY and MEEMEEE. It's their cover-up, not the Palace. Megafraud knows this, and thinks she pulled a fast one over on the Palace and the UK. What a mess.

  • @bethmoe-mciver8557
    @bethmoe-mciver8557 Місяць тому +81

    She was never in labor😂😂😂😂

  • @romarobbins270
    @romarobbins270 Місяць тому +63

    How can it be lost in translation when we all speak the same language? When I read about the birthing story in Spare, my first thought was tell me you’ve never seen an actual birth, without telling me you’ve never seen a birth.

    • @betht60
      @betht60 Місяць тому +6

      🎯🎯🎯

  • @terrytrammell7388
    @terrytrammell7388 Місяць тому +8

    IF MEGAN HAD BEEN PREGNANT AT HER AGE IT WOULD HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED A HIGH RISK PREGNANCY.

  • @marleneclough3173
    @marleneclough3173 Місяць тому +29

    The birth certificates for Catherine s children is hand written as is usual
    Archie's birth certificate is typed!!!

    • @jimbo6059
      @jimbo6059 Місяць тому +1

      Even a copy of the certificate like I had to get for my new passport would be written in ink.

  • @amandajudge472
    @amandajudge472 Місяць тому +70

    Really they tried to put this on the royal family 😂😂,,, this is on Harry and megain,,, these 2 are in it for themselves,,

    • @gillduale8020
      @gillduale8020 Місяць тому +1

      They blame everyone else, never their fault..when it comes out about Roachel not carrying the children, they’ll blame the palace and say, they made them lie!🙄🇬🇧

    • @amandajudge472
      @amandajudge472 Місяць тому

      @@gillduale8020 you went and see ,,they never take the blame for thing,, its always someone's else's fault,,

  • @mary-annebarnett654
    @mary-annebarnett654 Місяць тому +19

    What a load of old bull they spin. Registrars do not make mistakes. Registrars are well versed in the correct forms of address and use of titles and honourifics. Because of the history of over 1,000 years behind the titles, hereditary rules and honourifics attention to detail is meticulous for legal documentation and recording facts. Palace staff are professionals not grifters.

  • @fionahall3900
    @fionahall3900 Місяць тому +38

    She loves the camera anyone else think she would have passed up an opportunity to pose on the hospital steps. And you're right my sons cord was around his neck and i was told DON'T PUSH.🙏❤😊

    • @JoRN1222
      @JoRN1222 Місяць тому +3

      My daughter too. Ended up with an emergency C section.

    • @jimbo6059
      @jimbo6059 Місяць тому

      It mjst have been very painful stopping the urge to push at thst time.

  • @marinaknife4595
    @marinaknife4595 Місяць тому +45

    They also claimed a female Dr delivered Archie & her husband said not true as she was abroad on holiday. Then they came up with another DR who said she wasn't present at the birth.

    • @betht60
      @betht60 Місяць тому +4

      That in itself is extremely weird! Who has ever heard of a doctor named as the attending physician, only to have them later say they weren't there? Bizarre!

    • @jimbo6059
      @jimbo6059 Місяць тому +3

      I believe thst doctor is married to an earl. He came out and stated she was on holiday.

  • @catpatrick3838
    @catpatrick3838 Місяць тому +53

    On the day of the birth didn't Harry tell the press something along the lines of "they change so much in the first two weeks"? Or something similar. The only thing that stood out was he said "first two weeks" on the day the birth was announced.

    • @jimbo6059
      @jimbo6059 Місяць тому

      Maybe it was her belly deflating.

  • @gloriacrossley201
    @gloriacrossley201 Місяць тому +38

    We had more talk on the miscarriage than the birth of both babies. In my opinion the excuse for not attending the UK court when again found out in her lie & misleading ... The apology shouldn't make Meg exempt from perjury 👺

    • @stephaniehooper386
      @stephaniehooper386 Місяць тому +6

      I totally believe that and I can't believe everybody else can't see it either

  • @Agnar669
    @Agnar669 Місяць тому +68

    The first pic Meghan posted of Archie, immediately after birth, was a German baby wrapped in a green blanket. Meghan told the world, she hoped everybody enjoyed the photo of Archie as much as they did.....until the German mother came forward and claimed it was her baby.
    So her pregnancy was highly, and hilariously, suspect; her birth was right out of a black comedy skit; and the first pic of Archie was bogus.

    • @betht60
      @betht60 Місяць тому +8

      That's interesting! I don't even remember such a picture. I thought the meeting with the Queen and Prince Philip was the first 'picture' we saw of Archie.

    • @junescoular292
      @junescoular292 Місяць тому +5

      ​@@betht60They even put up a pic of themselves only, in the delivery room wearing hospital gowns. The pic wasn't there for long.

    • @betht60
      @betht60 Місяць тому +6

      @@junescoular292 what a pair of frauds.

    • @dawnjohnson5937
      @dawnjohnson5937 Місяць тому +4

      @@junescoular292 Really??? Shame no one grabbed the pic!

    • @dawnjohnson5937
      @dawnjohnson5937 Місяць тому +3

      REALLY??? Is that still up somewhere?

  • @madd4545
    @madd4545 Місяць тому +45

    Official documents like a birth certificate in the UK have to be written as in hand written not printed and has to be written in black ink

    • @Agnar669
      @Agnar669 Місяць тому +7

      That is an excellent point.

  • @staceywilliams7721
    @staceywilliams7721 Місяць тому +30

    I think when William becomes king he will be taking out the trash. They know the have limited time and it's starting to show. Putting Catherine in writing in that book naming her as a racist put the final nail in that coffin for William.

  • @childrenpraisegod1230
    @childrenpraisegod1230 Місяць тому +57

    #2:02 That announcement from "Buckingham palace" about MM going into "LABOR" is American English. The British spell LABOUR differently so who announced it?

  • @Nancymarie_
    @Nancymarie_ Місяць тому +82

    I think that’s part of the reason that Megan when she was allegedly pregnant with Betty didn’t come across the pond because she was using a baby bump and she had to go through security. This is my conspiracy theory.

    • @evelynhillier2877
      @evelynhillier2877 Місяць тому +10

      The only thing wrong with that thought is that she flew to NYC for her baby shower with the Archie bump...

    • @helengunter378
      @helengunter378 Місяць тому +14

      @@evelynhillier2877Then was photographed without the bump. Her security guards face!

    • @nonaknight9491
      @nonaknight9491 Місяць тому +1

      @@evelynhillier2877 I. Wonder whaat that X-ray would have shown⁉️

    • @EspressoBaby
      @EspressoBaby Місяць тому +11

      We are not conspiracy theorists. We are pattern recognition specialists. 👊

    • @damsonginqueen1180
      @damsonginqueen1180 Місяць тому +6

      @@evelynhillier2877didn’t she go by private jet and because she was married to H she probably wouldn’t have to go through x ray.

  • @Eliza_Jane787
    @Eliza_Jane787 Місяць тому +13

    In my humble opinion, I do not think they have custody of any children.

  • @katekrissana
    @katekrissana Місяць тому +64

    MeAgain was too old to give birth to any real child.

    • @SilverSparkles22
      @SilverSparkles22 Місяць тому +24

      She wasn't but she didn't

    • @hollyardis4524
      @hollyardis4524 Місяць тому +22

      She technically wasn't too old, but she did announce it pretty quickly after marriage. Then, after a nice wait, she was pregnant again. It's just a touch not normal to have two babies after the age of 37-40. Rather not right. It could happen but, hard to believe.

    • @Agnar669
      @Agnar669 Місяць тому +23

      Considering it has been claimed she had a hysterectomy, missing lady parts might be more relevant here than her age.

    • @mordrethboehm4818
      @mordrethboehm4818 Місяць тому +16

      @@hollyardis4524Two “pregnancies” - one that lasted about ten months - and between them the alleged miscarriage‼️ Wonder Woman Extraordinaire‼️

    • @hollyardis4524
      @hollyardis4524 Місяць тому +5

      @@mordrethboehm4818 I love your comment! You nailed it! 😊👍

  • @janetrobertshaw6487
    @janetrobertshaw6487 Місяць тому +25

    Full meal in labour. OMG.......they are such idiots....

    • @jimbo6059
      @jimbo6059 Місяць тому

      Probably a full meal at the Labour leader's house.

  • @marjijohnson4509
    @marjijohnson4509 Місяць тому +3

    Let’s face it she made a huge exhibition of herself when it came to showing everyone that she was pregnant. She wore figure hugging dresses and on one occasion was pictured “caressing” her baby bump. But as soon as it came to delivery she suddenly became coy and secretive. I was always suspicious!

  • @margaretmclennan5169
    @margaretmclennan5169 Місяць тому +68

    They cannot jump in front of anyone and once william becomes kingvnone of them will be in line

    • @evelynhillier2877
      @evelynhillier2877 Місяць тому +5

      The King has no executive power to remove anyone from the Line of Succession. Parliament makes the laws and regulations.

    • @stephie4ever
      @stephie4ever Місяць тому +6

      @@evelynhillier2877 Then suffice to say that Parliament broke protocol....or their very own laws and regulations by adding children who were not proven to have been born from her body?

    • @junescoular292
      @junescoular292 Місяць тому

      ​@@stephie4ever It's a big surmise that if Archie came to be crowned as a future Monarch, I read online, that just before a Coronation proper, there is a procedure where the Bishops etc. Will ask the person if they are a true and legal heir to the throne. The person has to answer in all honesty that he/she is. I'm sure if that were ever to come about, dna procedures would definitely take place. So let's put our minds at rest about that. Ain't never gonna legally happen. IMO

  • @joanneyee9168
    @joanneyee9168 Місяць тому +41

    Evening Sue Harry's wife and her ever changing baby bump. Hopefully the truth will come out eventually. None of Harry's stories in his book make sense either regarding the birth. 🐨🇦🇺🦘

  • @indie1179
    @indie1179 Місяць тому +25

    Look closely at the wording of the statement issued by BP for Little Betty’s birth. Play close attention to the word ‘for’.

  • @lokizig
    @lokizig Місяць тому +54

    Good morning Sue and anyone who's watching
    ❤xx

  • @LeeDon76
    @LeeDon76 Місяць тому +16

    Remember Megain’s montecito baby doctor suddenly retired. She had an excellent reputation and many patients who were left confused and without a doctor. Her husband is an ivf specialist. It was never explained why she disappeared.

    • @betht60
      @betht60 Місяць тому +1

      Yeppers! Another extremely strange occurrence surrounding the birth of a Sussex child.

  • @SelinaBarton-ij5iz
    @SelinaBarton-ij5iz Місяць тому +35

    Putting The Duchess of Sussex on the birth certificate could mean anybody. Let's say Hairplugs still held the Duke of Sussex title and then remarried his new wife would be The Duchess of Sussex. She should have left it be. Trouble is with Roachel is, she's obsessed with titles (even though she swears blind they mean nothing to her).

  • @elephantwanderer6576
    @elephantwanderer6576 Місяць тому +15

    It wasn't misinformation it was a blatant lie!!!😭😭💯💯💯

  • @margaretnicol3423
    @margaretnicol3423 Місяць тому +32

    The thing is that if they did use surrogates because they couldn't have kids no-one would care. A bit of sadness that they couldn't have kids and then move on. If she used surrogates to keep her figure then people would care! The only thing people really dislike is dishonesty.

    • @minihaha5367
      @minihaha5367 Місяць тому +14

      But they couldn’t be in the LOS or have princely titles…and that’s what mattered to them

    • @Agnar669
      @Agnar669 Місяць тому +1

      There are very strict rules for the Line of Succession. To be in the LOS, the kids must have the DNA of both parents, and Meghan must have physically given birth. Only if they weren't fraudulently put into the LOS, would nobody care. Transparency, legitimacy in the LOS matters....assuming, of course, Harry is legitimate. Meghan lied because she obviously wanted all the royal perks, she expected pensions for life, security for life. When British taxpayers pay, this matters. The kids aren't entitled to anything.

    • @margaretquinn5133
      @margaretquinn5133 Місяць тому +2

      Lady C did a good take on her Channel regarding Surrogacy,Los,and King Charles, Highly recommended..

    • @susancohen8009
      @susancohen8009 Місяць тому

      They care, they want the titiles, monies, etc.

  • @janetrobertshaw6487
    @janetrobertshaw6487 Місяць тому +25

    Someone was in labour...but not Meghan Markle....

    • @jimbo6059
      @jimbo6059 Місяць тому

      It was the Labour party. Pushing a new leader.

  • @stellaallbright4750
    @stellaallbright4750 Місяць тому +23

    CORRECTION: **TWO** EPIDURALS!!!

  • @gailm9543
    @gailm9543 Місяць тому +3

    Every Brit who is a royalist needs to be screaming for validation of these two children. The grifters cannot get away with this nonsense. Also, people in the states need to be calling DCFS to do a well child check on those kids. Who’s watching them while the dastardly duo are flying all over the world making their BS appearances? Doria who abandoned Megan when she was young? Who is watching out for the well-being of those children?

  • @marioncampbell2156
    @marioncampbell2156 Місяць тому +36

    Don't know about England but in Scotland you can't change what's on the original birth certificate.

    • @betht60
      @betht60 Місяць тому +3

      Yes!! I'm American and you can't just change a birth certificate. My husband adopted our two oldest in a step-parent adoption and only after the adoption process and court ruling, were their birth certs changed to reflect that he was their father.

  • @VerifiableEvidence
    @VerifiableEvidence Місяць тому +19

    That “bump” …. Nope. Not real.

  • @maryb2185
    @maryb2185 Місяць тому +6

    Don't forget the American doctor at the Portland was named several times by m as the person who delivered the baby. Eventually her husband got fed up reading that and informed the media they should stop printing that as he and his wife were out the country on holiday at the time and so his wife did not deliver the child.

  • @lauriemcmurtry782
    @lauriemcmurtry782 Місяць тому +22

    I had both of mine natural and believe me everyone in the hospital knew i was giving birth, lol.

  • @MarisaPaola-um5yb
    @MarisaPaola-um5yb Місяць тому +13

    where is the doctor who 'delivered' Archie? Ive seen a statement from that doctors husband, on another channel, who stated 'my wife did not deliver the baby, no reporters contacted us to verify, or we would have told them'.

  • @juliehilton1701
    @juliehilton1701 Місяць тому +14

    Did anyone actually see in real life her when she was allegedly pregnant with Lily? Because I don’t think she was pregnant with Lily either .

    • @ceejayretired
      @ceejayretired Місяць тому +3

      Apparently she went storming into the spotify office 2 weeks pre alleged birth but forgot to wear the moonbump. Some staff commented about it. But she also had changing bump sizes, just look at photos of her in the Oprah interview, she goes from huge in the chicken coop to approx 5 months down to barely pregnant.

  • @jilllawton8556
    @jilllawton8556 Місяць тому +15

    Imagine in about 15 years time and there is a young man claiming to be the kings Grandson

  • @Miss-Tibbs
    @Miss-Tibbs Місяць тому +34

    Someone needs to come clean and pronto! Its beyond a joke now! Great video Sue, love to Finn.🧡

  • @margaretcross1419
    @margaretcross1419 Місяць тому +26

    My thoughts exactly Sue, once they became legal guardians of that child the birth certificate was altered. Yes legal documents are fast tracked for the RF. Her name had to be removed as she was not the person who gave birth. My goodness was she having triplets in that medicine ball photograph. Gosh I am only 5' in height and even with an 8lb baby I was never that size.

  • @AJM-gg2jy
    @AJM-gg2jy Місяць тому +2

    No woman who is 8 months pregnant can squat down with her knees together, in 4 inch heels and no assistance getting up. There is NOWHERE for the bump to go when you squat down. That's more than enough proof for me.

  • @tammy7724
    @tammy7724 Місяць тому +2

    If the monarchy covered for these grifters and now has this random child not even born of her body in the line of succession, this will be the end of them. They need to get ahead of this story and tell the truth before the public blames the monarchy instead of the grifters.

  • @itsreallyme-it7zj
    @itsreallyme-it7zj Місяць тому +7

    I am Australian, never been a monarchist, but have now found love and respect for our royal family, thankyou Migraine

  • @denisesteggar9010
    @denisesteggar9010 Місяць тому +22

    The palace knew all along that she did not give birth to those kids. They are between a rock and a hard place.

    • @maggieswithenbank6709
      @maggieswithenbank6709 Місяць тому

      And it’s getting rockier and harder because the UK citizens want to know the truth! Want to trust that the right royals are in line to the throne!

  • @JoyceJohansen
    @JoyceJohansen Місяць тому +2

    This is what I have said from the very beginning. There are NO children. Only borrowed ones.

  • @cameliawilks2049
    @cameliawilks2049 Місяць тому +1

    This needs to be settled once and for all. The Palace needs to stop covering for them. Their titles need to be removed, including the alleged children’s. They should be remove from the Line of Succession NOW until proof of their legitimate births are given. Time to STOP cowering to the
    Monticeto duo.

  • @kathrynschierloh7358
    @kathrynschierloh7358 Місяць тому +5

    Regarding that picture of Harry’s wife in the white dress and Harry jamming his thumb into the side of the Archie doll, remember that Harry said, “Babies change a lot in two weeks, er, I mean, two days.” Busted!!

  • @margaretquinn5133
    @margaretquinn5133 Місяць тому +4

    Those children should be taken off LOS, Titles removed until a DNA is done in the States and the UK.
    If there is nothing to hide those two would allow it.
    There silence speaks Volumes 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧...

  • @PatYoung-at-heart
    @PatYoung-at-heart Місяць тому +2

    As a midwife the whole pregnancy and birth is very unusual. And let's face it, any opportunity for Meghan to stand in front of a camera never goes without her being there. Thank you Sue.

  • @evelyno7313
    @evelyno7313 Місяць тому +2

    Prince William shouldn’t have to deal with that at all. His father the King should deal with the problem.

  • @raap141
    @raap141 Місяць тому +30

    I am a Nurse and gave birth to five, one with PDA in my opinion, no way that she had no Surrogate

    • @betht60
      @betht60 Місяць тому +2

      What's PDA?

    • @betht60
      @betht60 Місяць тому +2

      ​@@freefalling911 Thanks, I thought you were talking about the birth of one of your children ❤

    • @natvtxn1213
      @natvtxn1213 Місяць тому +2

      We use PDA to mean Public Display of Affection, so didn't understand that either. 🤭

    • @betht60
      @betht60 Місяць тому

      @@natvtxn1213 Yes! 😂

    • @raap141
      @raap141 Місяць тому +3

      @@betht60 oh, it's German and means periduralanästhesie and it was a Caesarean section, it was my first child.

  • @victoriabraham3692
    @victoriabraham3692 Місяць тому +25

    its all going to come out soon and they will be blacklisted big time

    • @maxinemorales2799
      @maxinemorales2799 Місяць тому +3

      🙏🙏

    • @maggieswithenbank6709
      @maggieswithenbank6709 Місяць тому +8

      More than black listed I would hope. What they’ve done is fraud-that’s a CRIME and should be in jail!

  • @maggiex1212
    @maggiex1212 Місяць тому +30

    Good morning Sue! Remember Harry's comment about how much Archie had changed in two weeks but he had just born a few days before. The British people deserve to know the truth. Interesting information you gave. What a mess. ❤🐕🐈‍⬛🐈
    Edit: They expected the Palace to cover their backside.

    • @mariarevell4836
      @mariarevell4836 Місяць тому +3

      That's why I gather QE2 gave them their marching Orders...too much deceit and smoke and mirrors from H$M

  • @user-ny3vn2zh8m
    @user-ny3vn2zh8m Місяць тому +10

    She's a fool if she didn't have those kids. With them she has control over Harry and his money. Without them he can walk away.

  • @Elaina802
    @Elaina802 Місяць тому +3

    Her sister was spot on when she said it's lie, after lie, after lie, and now the comments on Dan Wooton's outspoken video with Lady C has gone crazy

  • @cynthiaerwin2851
    @cynthiaerwin2851 Місяць тому +2

    To be a ROYAL, in LoS, bear TITLES and INHERIT...rach has TO PROVE she CONCEIVED, carried FULL TERM, gave WITNESSED BIRTH to a son/daughter & CREDITABLE BIRTH CERTIFICATES... she IS NOT ABLE TO DO ANY OF THOSE!!!

  • @P.Crain007
    @P.Crain007 Місяць тому +2

    Harry and his wife lie so much they don’t know how to tell the truth 😂😂😂😂

  • @katrinag9898
    @katrinag9898 Місяць тому +17

    It was a big thing when there were no obgyn signatures on the palace announcement. If they are in line to the throne everything should have been done by the book. I don't believe he had the laughing gas thing either. He would not have been allowed to have a surrogate's laughing gas.

  • @TerriBinkney-yu9es
    @TerriBinkney-yu9es Місяць тому +3

    When Harry's book was published and the lies within started to be exposed, the only thought that came to mind was why would the publishers, let alone the ghost writer, go along with the printing of this book? Didn't anyone read it and advise not to print it because of how foolish Harry would look and the people who would read it are not stupid to believe everything he remembered as being the truth....that still amazes me to this day!

  • @magdacristina3572
    @magdacristina3572 Місяць тому +3

    It's impressive how her ankles didn't swell with those high heels. The belly moves like jelly. A pregnant belly is firm and not soft. Farce. Pure falsehood. When will the king take action? Never

  • @victoriabraham3692
    @victoriabraham3692 Місяць тому +28

    I thought we had been demanding that since the beginning???!!!😂

    • @ladyvilla1956
      @ladyvilla1956 Місяць тому +6

      Yes, but I think Lady C coming out as strongly as she did has really upped the anti now.

    • @betht60
      @betht60 Місяць тому +1

      ​@@ladyvilla1956 Yes, most of the media and the world have not been on this case until now. There was a need for time to pass before official action could be taken. Especially since we had the passing of a 70-year reigning Sovereign at the same time.

    • @junescoular292
      @junescoular292 Місяць тому +1

      Yankee Wally has always maintained this .. the reason she was removed from ytube imo.

  • @edwinswift2646
    @edwinswift2646 Місяць тому +4

    I believe by Meghan and Harry not following Royal birth procedures has caused this problem. Since the birth of the children did not follow Royal birth procedures, their parents have disqualified them to be on the line of succession.

  • @linalove5915
    @linalove5915 Місяць тому +6

    Pyranka and her husband Jonas who used a surrogate for their baby girl, stated during an interview that they used the same surrogate as H&M. I didn’t screenshot the story because at the time as wasn’t interested in H&W

  • @vivienhowe5028
    @vivienhowe5028 Місяць тому +2

    RF HAVE to come clean about the births of BOTH the children.
    Those in close line of succession HAVE to have birth witnessed, this was NOT done, and as the people of UK could end up paying for these children THEY HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW
    And without delay

  • @blodwen6946
    @blodwen6946 Місяць тому +10

    “no intentions of misleading anybody” - from a pair of proven liars who wouldn’t recognise the truth if you thumped them in the face with it.

  • @judithrichards6085
    @judithrichards6085 Місяць тому +10

    I was SUCH A FRAUD! Nothing new there then. 🤥🤥🤥🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧