Uhh I’m a person who don’t have a dog in the fight, but to me Sam had a much more coherent argument and if I was a jury and had to make a decision on who won, it definitely would be Sam, and it’s not really even close
@markruby3916 Great. Then you should be able to EXPLAIN just one single thing he said I didn't answer. Just one, ok? Now, why didn't he answer me on the meaning of "angel" and John 1:29-30? Answer: He and you are stupid. Simple!
And there it is Sam showed he doesn’t know what an Angel is. It’s awesome Greg knew where he was going a mile away that Sam was going to say Jesus had a dual angelic-man nature when Greg clearly had Sam go to John 1:29-30 where Jesus is showing he pre-existed and was A MAN. Not dual nature like Sam’s false trinity
@@yahuhallah1259 Agreed. However, a minor detail I'd explain a bit differently: Jesus didn't exist as a man before John. More like, long before his birth as a human, he existed as the same being in a different form (morphē).
@@andriaqua Your whole comment is oversimplified and you’re interpolating the text that that doesn’t agree with you. Two text alone in this chapter disagrees with you verse 14 “the word became flesh “ and Greg’s point in verse 30 “This is he of whom I said, ‘After me comes *A MAN* who ranks before me, because he was before me.” This slaps your false interpretation in the face and proves you did a whole lot of interpolation what doesn’t say where as Greg was just referencing the text that Jesus was and what did John the Baptist call him? *”A MAN”* but you claim God-man where do you get that from because John 1:1 doesn’t agree with you based on verse 14.
It's weird how he couldn't make a connection between ''angel'' and ''spirit''. This means he can't bypass his programming. If he ever does this, he'll make many other connections that'd be very useful for understanding the biblical doctrine.
Before Greg answered Sam's question Greg asked the question [to clarify and help Sam to understand the point Greg was about to make] about "an angelic person" BUT Sam did not answer Greg's question. I guess Sam realised he had failed very very badly. As I expected. Sam needs to humble himself, do more research and come to the terms with the teachings of the Bible if he really wants to be a true Christian.
That's exactly what he realized, which is why instead of answering a question even a teenager could answer he says, "Ok here we go." Here we go where, fatso? Asking you to tell me what you're asking me about so I can answer you? I guess that was all it took to take down the Great Pervert! One little question about "angel" and down he goes!
I've been thinking about these issues, and i was wondering if Jesus was around in Job 1:6 when the Sons of GOD presented themselves before the LORD....where was Jesus? Arent all the sons of God angel's?
@lalo2641 you guys are calling the lords portrayed in the ot as Jesus and is wrong...just flat out wrong wrong...there's fields of study and scholars that know this. The baal, yahweh and El were worshipped by jews...we actually have a lot of texts writings artifacts etc that show this yall look really silly as "bible" scholars when you look at the evidence....
@lalo2641 elohim came from where? H3068 = verb to be, God of OT yehova or yehwah... El is indict3d in more texts...in Egypt as Ptah Lord or eternity...prism from tel lachish...amenhotep II on other side...same title appears in Serabitt text 353 proto-sinia inscription...Ptah (adon - the lord, olam - eternal onr) = lord...enternal one (in bronze age)...5th century bce herodotus never mentions yahweh or Moses or king David but does write about ptah (hephaestus), herodotus book II. 148, Egypt divides up into 12 districts with 12 kings... like I said yall have no clue and only reference the bible...there's a vast array or texts writings and artifacts that tell us otherwise
Was Jesus in the throne in Job 1:6?already ?or was he like the rest of the Sons? During that time, there was no dying and going to Heaven humans or prophet's or apostles nothing but The Sons of God .
@andriaqua eternal in proverbs 8, it said Jesus was created eternal means very long time not forever existing Jesus in his gospels made it clear he The Son of God. Others rather believe paul instead oft Jesus words on red,
Greg is so intelligent...see the way he asked the question and Sam could not answer ? Why? Because trinity will be destroyed and he will be out. It is like in the book of john 12 how the Pharisees they did not confess it, for fear that [if they should acknowledge Him] they would be expelled from the synagogue;
There is a geopolitical discussion surrounding the Israeli Gov announcement that they are in the two Messiah prophecy. This is not discussion re religiosity but a deapolitical pathway to Armageddon.. Greg, if you can buy out the time, Christensen " has shrugged their shoulder [w/o an annswer] - would you be casting you pearls before stone to address this?
I think UA-cam is shadow blocking you. I typed CWJah in and usually your channel comes up. Now it’s a bunch of random bs and I had to dig in my history to find the channel. Sue their biased ass 😂
Uhh I’m a person who don’t have a dog in the fight, but to me Sam had a much more coherent argument and if I was a jury and had to make a decision on who won, it definitely would be Sam, and it’s not really even close
@markruby3916 Great. Then you should be able to EXPLAIN just one single thing he said I didn't answer. Just one, ok? Now, why didn't he answer me on the meaning of "angel" and John 1:29-30? Answer: He and you are stupid. Simple!
@@markruby3916 He didn't have an argument. So what are you talking about? Try watching next time...
Exactly, Sam always stick to a point, while they go in tangents.
@angelicalee6 He sticks to William's rear end. But that's about all...
@@CWJahTube answering something and giving an answer that is biblically accurate is two different things
And there it is Sam showed he doesn’t know what an Angel is. It’s awesome Greg knew where he was going a mile away that Sam was going to say Jesus had a dual angelic-man nature when Greg clearly had Sam go to John 1:29-30 where Jesus is showing he pre-existed and was A MAN. Not dual nature like Sam’s false trinity
@@yahuhallah1259 Agreed. However, a minor detail I'd explain a bit differently: Jesus didn't exist as a man before John. More like, long before his birth as a human, he existed as the same being in a different form (morphē).
@ I would agree with you but i believe that morphe was a spirit being. Jesus had a pre-existence in heaven before becoming a man.
@@yahuhallah1259 Yeah, that's what I'm saying also. It's just this manhood was something he obtained after being born, right? Technically speaking.
@@andriaqua Your whole comment is oversimplified and you’re interpolating the text that that doesn’t agree with you. Two text alone in this chapter disagrees with you verse 14 “the word became flesh “ and Greg’s point in verse 30 “This is he of whom I said, ‘After me comes *A MAN* who ranks before me, because he was before me.” This slaps your false interpretation in the face and proves you did a whole lot of interpolation what doesn’t say where as Greg was just referencing the text that Jesus was and what did John the Baptist call him? *”A MAN”* but you claim God-man where do you get that from because John 1:1 doesn’t agree with you based on verse 14.
It's weird how he couldn't make a connection between ''angel'' and ''spirit''. This means he can't bypass his programming. If he ever does this, he'll make many other connections that'd be very useful for understanding the biblical doctrine.
@andriaqua Greg doesn't argue Jesus is Michael. Not with 100% certainty. He made that clear in his videos.
Before Greg answered Sam's question Greg asked the question [to clarify and help Sam to understand the point Greg was about to make] about "an angelic person" BUT Sam did not answer Greg's question. I guess Sam realised he had failed very very badly. As I expected. Sam needs to humble himself, do more research and come to the terms with the teachings of the Bible if he really wants to be a true Christian.
That's exactly what he realized, which is why instead of answering a question even a teenager could answer he says, "Ok here we go." Here we go where, fatso? Asking you to tell me what you're asking me about so I can answer you? I guess that was all it took to take down the Great Pervert! One little question about "angel" and down he goes!
I've been thinking about these issues, and i was wondering if Jesus was around in Job 1:6 when the Sons of GOD presented themselves before the LORD....where was Jesus? Arent all the sons of God angel's?
Ther3s other lords in the ot...don't be fooled most of Christianity is borrowed
@tgshark1 don't understand your comment can you be more specific?
@lalo2641 you guys are calling the lords portrayed in the ot as Jesus and is wrong...just flat out wrong wrong...there's fields of study and scholars that know this. The baal, yahweh and El were worshipped by jews...we actually have a lot of texts writings artifacts etc that show this yall look really silly as "bible" scholars when you look at the evidence....
@tgshark1 tell me what does H3068 means ?
@lalo2641 elohim came from where? H3068 = verb to be, God of OT yehova or yehwah...
El is indict3d in more texts...in Egypt as Ptah Lord or eternity...prism from tel lachish...amenhotep II on other side...same title appears in Serabitt text 353 proto-sinia inscription...Ptah (adon - the lord, olam - eternal onr) = lord...enternal one (in bronze age)...5th century bce herodotus never mentions yahweh or Moses or king David but does write about ptah (hephaestus), herodotus book II. 148, Egypt divides up into 12 districts with 12 kings... like I said yall have no clue and only reference the bible...there's a vast array or texts writings and artifacts that tell us otherwise
Was Jesus in the throne in Job 1:6?already ?or was he like the rest of the Sons? During that time, there was no dying and going to Heaven humans or prophet's or apostles nothing but The Sons of God .
@andriaqua Satan among the sons of God not separated from them
@andriaqua where does it say the father and son reign together it says the son was given all power?
@@andriaqua the son is not coequal Isaiah 46:5 KJV
@andriaqua eternal in proverbs 8, it said Jesus was created eternal means very long time not forever existing Jesus in his gospels made it clear he The Son of God. Others rather believe paul instead oft Jesus words on red,
@@Scott-t2p isaiah 46:5 good scripture
Greg is so intelligent...see the way he asked the question and Sam could not answer ? Why? Because trinity will be destroyed and he will be out.
It is like in the book of john 12 how the Pharisees they did not confess it, for fear that [if they should acknowledge Him] they would be expelled from the synagogue;
Are you a former JW?
There is a geopolitical discussion surrounding the Israeli Gov announcement that they are in the two Messiah prophecy. This is not discussion re religiosity but a deapolitical pathway to Armageddon..
Greg, if you can buy out the time, Christensen " has shrugged their shoulder [w/o an annswer] - would you be casting you pearls before stone to address this?
I think UA-cam is shadow blocking you. I typed CWJah in and usually your channel comes up. Now it’s a bunch of random bs and I had to dig in my history to find the channel. Sue their biased ass 😂
Sam, William and other Catholics have people at UA-cam who do this stuff for them...