On 9/11, my dad worked at the FAA. There was a scheduling issue, and his morning meeting at the Pentagon was moved to later that afternoon, ultimately saving his life. I've never been more grateful for disorganization.
My dad was part of that renovation project. He put up those walls to be specific. He would have been there on that day but his team was sent to another project and were scheduled to come back the next day. Him and his company rebuilt that section and reinforced the rest of the Pentagon for the next 10 years.
My cousin was in the area that was hit an hour before the tragedy. He had retired but was visiting friends, many of which didn't survive. Between survivers guilt and depression from the loss of friends, he never got over it in his lifetime.
@@tr7938 Out of 3,000 people? Yeah sorry, can't remember 3,000 peoples names when i can barely remember my family members names. But that doesn't mean i don't care for the people.
It was a tragedy for everyone involved. But why didn’t they invade Saudi Arabia instead of Afghanistan? Bin Laden was a Saudi, the hijackers were all Saudi nationals and the funding came from the Saudis, why would you then invade Afghanistan? It could be argued they were following some pre-planned foreign policy objective and only needed a “trigger” event to push through their plans. It could certainly be interpreted that way, couldn’t it?
@@karmabomb3768 Kinda, yeah. But look at ISIS. Where they were (potentially) headquartered from, where they did business, but (for your argument) where they drew combatants from. Just look on innocent FB groups, it isn't hard to find someone ragging on the US.
@@dylanpeterson6192 it isn’t hard to be raging at America because they’re the biggest warmongers on the planet and either officially or unofficially are engaged in almost constant warfare.
I worked in a small furniture store and we were told not to watch tv. My boss Mitzi showed up and we left it on. When she came in she automatically started in on us about it. I looked at her and said, Mitzi, do you not know that America is under attack? I said there are 1000's of people dead, and it's not over. It was about 10:00, but we didn't know. Anyway, she didn't realize, she'd been listening to her music. After watching it for a while she left in tears, said she had to go check on her kids. We all wanted to go hug our kids. Anyway anyone grown that went through that day with any compassion will never be the same, never. Take care and God bless.
@@sandyworkman3025 I was home sick from work that day ... watching TV and saw it happening. I got on the phone with an elderly women friend who I knew would be watching also to comfort her, which was hard to do because I was just as upset. What's strange I was home sick on the first time of the bombing of the world trade center...watched the TV that day also. Still is so upsetting to all of us that watched and felt helpless! Take care and stay safe.
After the first World Trade Center attack in late 90’s there was an engineer documentary I watched. I remember thinking damn they just told someone how to drop the towers. The engineers explained how the towers w have to be hit not at the bottom but 3/4 of the way up. The show literally explained exactly how to successfully bring the towers down. I’d be willing to bet those behind 9-11 saw that same documentary.
There ia one documentry explaining all these conspiracy theories.. Anatomy of a great deception. After seeing this documentary my perception about the 9/11 attack & world is completely changed 🙄🙄
WoW! Impressive how the engineers strategies helped saved peoples lives. I still get chills thinking how awful that day was. I wish everyone peace and those who didn’t make it a restful peace.
Showing the world how they're designing the Pentagon to resist a terrorist attack doesn't endanger national security but showing you video from more than one Pentagon camera or confiscated privately owned footage of the attack does?
"....destroyed the first and part of the second floor...." I don't understand how a 757 only destroys the first floor, when in NY, comparable planes took out many floors at once.
what's even crazier is that there wasn't a single jet called to survey an intruding commercial plane that's heading towards the pentagon. Failure on all accounts of defense.
There was a training exercise going on that day, plus the airspace was chaos. I highly recommend a video here that has the audio of the entire day of air traffic controllers dealing with the plane traffic.
@@ElizabethT45 keep your head in the sand. The amount of "coincidences" on that day is staggering. And most people don't even realize how many there are. Truly sad.
@@markbrinton6790 just shut up with your conspiracy theories! I'm so sick of people like you trying to twist the story to make thinks worse and blame the government when the terrorists have already claimed responsibility!
Science and engineering logistics and design is amazing, so cool to see it saved lives on this horrific day. Hopefully soon they can make blast proof buildings and certain terror attacks woulnt be possible anymore in our country.
as for the PENTAGON, in that huge building this amazing plane (cruise missle) just happened to hit the room where the records were stored the day after Sec of Defense Rumsfeld stated there is 3 TRILLION DOLLARS UNACCOUNTED FOR.
@@firstlast1736 there's video there are just not showing classified material!!! HELLO! The more security footage of the pentagon they expose... the easier for terrorists to exploit what they see and try again . If you can see security footage of such a secure location, so can terrorists. Why would they show us where the SECURITY cameras are for the central unit of America's military???? Please stop repeating things you've heard from others and show some respect for this awful day.
@@firstlast1736 There are two general types of explosive ordinance (bombs, missiles, etc) . Most, are what's considered surface, or near surface detonation - where the device explodes shortly before impact, sending shrapnel and force in all directions. The other type are for specialty applications such as destroying runways or bunkers. In this case, such weapons use a secondary rocket to crash through the surface, and then explode. In other words- as far as damage goes, you either have explosion damage or tunneling and *then* explosion damage. Neither explains the damage to the pentagon. Maybe, if the exterior damage was all there was, it would at least be a possibility. But after the explosion whatever hit the pentagon, proceeded to tunnel completely through 2 of its rings, before penetrating a third. No military ordinance would do such a thing, mostly because there's no point. A jetliner would though. Jet fuel exploding as its tanks in the wings rupture, as said wings are ripped back. Meanwhile the fuselage continues plowing through the building until it expends the rest of its forward momentum.
Weird how the most secure place in the world don't have any CCTV of the plane strike I wonder how many camera's that building has around it and they had to go across the street and dr.up 2 frames wow
1. The Pentagon was the most protected and secured area in the world.. How is it possible that a (civilian) plane approached it without any reaction ? 2..How is it possible that the plane hit the most protected part of this huge complex ?
How is it that 20 years later, not a single piece of evidence has shown anything except a plane hit the building? How is it that 300+ eye witnesses all report seeing a plane? If it wasn't a plane, what happened to the plane was hijacked and all its passengers? If it wasn't a plane, why not? Could the attackers only hijack 3 planes but not 4? How is it that in a building FULL of military experts, not a single whistleblower has ever said anything except a plane hit the building? How is it that the survivors and the families of the dead haven't claimed anything but a plane hit the building? Where did the plane debris on the grounds come from? Was there a truck full of fuselage parts and burnt seats waiting nearby to drive up to a burning building and scatter the debris in front of first responders and thousands of eye witnesses? How is it that Truthers can be so ridiculous?
Because the government allowed it. Kinda strange how America is so well defended that after the first "plane" crashed, they did nothing about the others. Corrupt MFs
Can someone explain to me why there were emergency fighter jets in Massachusetts and southern Virginia, but not at Andrew’s Air Force base right outside DC?
There were four airbases to cover the eastern section of the continental US so they were spaced to cover that area. Langley was covering an area near DC and also the ADIZ off the coast.
@@clinteranovic8075 no, there were only 2 bases in the Northeast Sector that stationed emergency fighters, one of which was Langley , VA, in the extreme southeast corner of the sector. Please look this stuff up before responding.
@@kevin6293 I said the eastern section of the continental US , not the northeast sector. And to answer your question you could look this up "In February 1993, Gen. Colin Powell, U.S. Army, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, determined that, because of the greatly reduced Soviet threat, “the United States no longer needed a large, dedicated air defense force.” He therefore recommended that the number of dedicated Air National Guard units assigned to the continental air defense mission “be sharply reduced or eliminated” and that the mission should be carried out “by dual tasking existing active and reserve general-purpose fighter and training squadrons in the Air Force, the Navy, and the Marine Corps.” In a report sent on May 3, 1994, to the chairmen of the U.S. Senate and U.S. House armed services committees and subcommittees on defense appropriations, the General Accounting Office-as the General Accountability Office was then called-supported Powell’s recommendations, concluding that “A dedicated continental air defense force is no longer needed.”
Wow! Even after all of this time, I had no idea! I literally had no idea they had reinforced the building. But it is quite... odd that the ONE part of the building that got the reinforcement was the only part of the building that got hit.
what was the name of the company that removed the jet ??? how many people were on that plane ?? where were they taken . Where is the luggage ??? where did the plane go ???
You do understand that typical plane crashes mostly occur during take off and landing, at normal speeds. These planes were intentionally picked to have maximum fuel loads and went in full throttle.
@@alperdue2704 If full fuel load was an issue, then why did they flew across the whole country and back again before crashing into the Pentagon? Does not make any sense to me.
@@cyanah5979 They didn’t. Planes turned over NJ and PA. No where close to across the country. This would put them on target with as close as possible to full tanks. Why does this matter? What makes a bigger explosion and fire; full or empty tanks.
@@alperdue2704 Here is the flight path of AA Flight 77: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Airlines_Flight_77#/media/File:Flightpath-AA77.gif So they unnecessarily wasted around 90 minutes of fuel in a flight bound to LA. Again, this does not make sense at all; even more, the chance of being detected and intercepted became higher with every minute in flight.
hmmm. i would love to see some video footage of the impact from the multiple cameras that were visible in photos of roof of the pentagon. but weve only ever been shown a poor quality video from a local gas station.
Exactly. One of the most secure buildings on Earth has to use the CCTV from a gas station? When you say it out loud it seems even more unbelievable. My neighbour’s house has more home security than the Pentagon, it seems, if you believe what they’re telling you. Doesn’t ring true, does it?
@Edin Latic Many aircraft pieces were found. Do you honestly think a piece of what is essentially aluminum, traveling at over 500mph and hitting a solid object would just bounce off? You are disrespectful for accepting nonsense you read online and accepting it as fact without any research.
@@karmabomb3768 Ah yes, the mysterious "they". You know someone is a productive member of society when they always bring up a "they". Go outside and touch grass.
The best thing you can do is have fun on your birthday. Every birthday if we look at history would have an awful event that happened. Mine is Sandy Hook not born the same year, but still feels awful to think about those children and my dogs was born 9-11. Take care and stay safe!
@@mikebyrd8278 yea just like that one really clear video of the “plane” hitting it, all those cameras around the pentagon and we get one from the security stand 150yards away. Wake up 🤡
@@keanudarkly9497 And what is bin Laden saying about that TODAY? You praise the US Navy pilots revealing their visuals of UFOs, yet denigrate the US in a subsequent comment. Get back to us when you've matured.
Wow. I was going to turn 24 and I remember that this tragedy just completely ruined my birthday. But not because of selfishness, but because everything was just so gloomy and terrifying.
edye ann I remember everything, because I was at school when it's happened. The teacher told us what has just happened. I don't remember all the details. But at 9 turning 10 you know everything
Thank Heaven for these people who had the foresight to reinforce that part of the building. When 9/11 happened, it was more shocking for me than I can ever admit. I suffered from depression from this event for months. RIP to all who lost their lives! God bless all who suffered in this horrible thing!
Me, too. For months after, I would find myself crying, even though I was not personally affected by 9/11. This was somethin which would come totally out of the blue. 9/11 was just horrible. A friend of mine said she saw the plane fly low over her house (she lives not too far from the Pentagon. I pray we never see anything like this again.
@@u.s.m.c.fewproudthemarines2987 I'm just being honest mate... If the plane crashed where are the engines and if the plane did crash the impact explosion would have debris scattered around the surrounding area as well as the trajectory of the plane should have caused more damage ...instead it's seems to be only part of the exterior of the building.... The irony is that there was something that happened on September 11 in the year 1941.... Isn't it ironic.... All I know is that American foreign policy destroys peoples culture identity cities communities... infrastructure and sovereign counties .... Yet the Chinese are actually building infrastructure and development for new emerging economies such as ones in Africa... America is a cancer on democracies
1. Not every inch of this building was monitored by CCTV cameras. 2. You've seen footage from outside and you still don't want to believe what happened. 3. You choose to believe unfounded "theories" on the Internet, no evidence required, so why should anyone pander to your nonsense when you're just going to dismiss all reality anyway? 4. Nothing is going to convince you morons that reality is real, you believe anonymous accounts online and self-confessed liars like Alex Jones. Every "theory" you guys put forward has been debunked, a million times. Nothing can be said to make a delusional person accept a reality when they're determined to believe a fantasy.
Every inch? It's an entire side of the 5 sides. All they showed was a camera from the toll machine! You are the delusional one if you think asking for any video is too much. High security places will have all sides covered even if you cannot do facial recognition from every inch.
@@MichaelBylehn Information regarding the pentagon’s layout, breaching points, and camera placements it’s self can/ are secrets. It holds so much of our information, I think being careful to not show some of it well justified. But what are your views over the footage seen? It covers the attack, there are also photographs of the burning area by others not working encountering the sight, and other such evidence. I’m sorry if I come across as rude, but I’m curious your stance and beliefs’ evidence behind ideas of the attack.
Thank you for republishing these again, 60 Minutes. It's my wish you'd provide as much as you can, if not all. What I appreciate most is while there is bias in reporting, you do your best to just give the facts and trust we, the people, to understand and decide for ourselves. In fact, I think the quote to you use to sum this article up says it well. "I don't ask why anymore. I just say thank you."
@@jayemeljay2117 I'm only going to reply to you once. I'm open for an opposing point of view, but I do not tolerate willful lies. Besides, your words are an attempt to belittle and mock. That already proves you're a liar and a fraud. 1) You assumed I've never seen a crash of any sort or a plane crash. You don't know me. It's arrogant of you to assume. For the record, I've seen over twenty, including four which have impacted buildings. 2) You tried to disparage that anything provided were facts. There is a difference between opinion and fact. Example: were those people who they claimed they were? Yes. Did such events happen on the days stated? Yes. Were such materials and methods used as reported? Yes. 3) I've seen many computerized models. I've also pointedly asked if people added in every bit of relevant information, such as the materials used in both points of impacts. Often, the answer is 'no.' That means the results were calculated on items effectively made of paper. Conclusion: people will see what they want to see. I can't say for certain since your mockery and derision are the only things I have to deduce from you. However, that's still a fair amount of evidence. You jumped to conclusions. You demonstrate contempt. You demonstrate anger. Until I see evidence otherwise, I am under the working conclusion you are yet another liar and fraud who hates 'Western Ideology' yet uses the natural willingness to discuss against it. I've met too many willful puppets to put up with the indoctrinated zealotry. You're entitled to an opinion, true. You're even allowed to speak your opinion. However, you also are required to back up your opinion with facts and consideration to other people. In short, I am not impressed with your self-righteous contempt which I have seen, nor by your intelligence which I have not seen. You are dismissed.
@@jayemeljay2117 Have you? Clearly not. What about PSA 1771. Which one of your "brothers" hijacked and crashed after being fired for his propensities. Not much wreckage. Did it not happen?
Much forensic evidence was despoiled. However enough remains to request an independent enquiry. Presumably a higher level of expertise might be considered. The 'Jenga' collapse belonging in primary education
Very true. Which is odd. But, there are dozens of eye witnesses accounts of actually seeing the plane before impact. So hard to find the truth in all of this
Pulverized. An aluminum plane going through that kind of reinforcement would have done just that. Like taking a massive sheet of aluminum foil and crumpling it up to a tiny ball, except with the explosion of jet fuel and fire it would have melted and burned instead. Have you watched footage of homes falling into swift moving water during flash floods? It takes about 5-10 seconds for the building to be pulverized into tiny pieces of debris. Stuff like that is just a ten thousandth of the proportional damage done in the Pentagon attack.
@@lisamarieashby2523 Stick built homes are no comparison to a commercial airplane. Where are the wings? No visible damage besides the central hole. It was a huge missile.
The Miracle is that according to the official story an amateur pilot who was on a suicide mission took the time and effort to maneuver the plane in a perfect downward spiral descent thousands of feet and perfectly binging the plane in just above the ground!!! wow!!
I seen a pilot with thousands of hours of flying experience try to recreate the flight path on a simulator. He either flipped the plane over or crashed into the ground and ended up deeming it impossible. Yet they tell us an amateur pilot who had minimal training managed to pull this off first time. Just another piece of the jigsaw that doesn’t fit the picture, one of the many, many pieces that don’t.
Check out BBC building 4 they reported that the building was down while it was still standing behind them while still talking then what happens 35min later the building falls
Are there any photos of the "big Parts" of the plane? A B757 is a big aircraft, big parts like engines, landing gear, tail should be recognizable after the crash....
No camera’s at the pentagon show any airplane to boot. Funny how one of the most supposed secured buildings in the world cant produce video. If you want to be sheep, go right ahead. I have done much research. Do the research yourself on what an airplane crash suppose to look like. Dont be so gullible.
@@이이-n4z8y well there are tons of pictures of jet debris on the internet. There are tons of interviews with people who saw the jet crashed into the building. There's recordings from the air traffic controllers watching the jet on radar and saw it crash into the building. A C130 pilot also wants to crash into the building. The Black box information is available online. They also identified everybody that was killed in the Pentagon except for five people.
@@rogerwilco5918 Tons of video content and non of that showed the remaining of one of the Pratt & Whitney JT9D-7R4. Perhaps it was a glider plain that hit the pentagon. Or can you show me just on picture with the remaining jet engine ? You’re just a believer 🤣
Yeah I've seen the photos and conspiracy. And given the lack of better photos of where the plane hit, it's plausible to think it was not a plane. Where are the engines etc. But I don't know. It very well might have been a plane and occams razor points to that too.
@@misterrees I love fiction. Tesseract though? Seriously, do you not have anything more in your life than being a bum who engages in too much nonsense? Get a job, go out and touch grass.
Yes it tumbled like cards soon after Silverstein said to pull it. Yes I have seen the video and the man said we decided to pull it. Who is we? And how did the explosives get installed on the day of 911?
so many coincidences... like finding the passport that went through one of the towers and landed on the floor undamaged, tower 7, and the lack of videos of the pentagon attack
1. The passport was one piece of evidence found in a mountain of evidence gathered from the biggest crime scene in the world, among the biggest investigation ever conducted. You people imagine someone just miraculously picked up one lone passport in the street, when the reality is that body parts and luggage was smashed out of the other side of the building and covered a wide area. All of that was collected. It's entirely likely they found that passport because it was in the pocket of a body they believed to be a victim - as many of the documents found that day appeared to be. 2. Tower 7 has been explained a thousand times but because you guys have so little to support your stupid "theories" you still cling to it like it's a gospel. The building was severely damaged by debris and fires burning out of control. The crews were ordered out of it because it was unsafe. The building collapsed due to that damage and those fires. The BBC reported that it had fallen because the AP had reported that it was collapsing. The AP incorrectly reported that likely because of confusion on the ground or a misunderstanding. All of this is FAR MORE LIKELY than the thousand bizarre delusions you choose to believe instead. 3. You are not owed videos of the attack. You are not owed HD 4K footage to "analyze" for your own perverse pleasure. You are not entitled to see victims being killed. Even if there were fifty new videos of the Pentagon attack you nut jobs would still be dismissing them all as "fake" because it doesn't suit your mentally defective narratives.
@Daniel Kintigh There was footage released from two Pentagon cameras too, all other cams, so we were told - did not catch the event. None of the released footage does show an airliner, but just the explosion. *and it lines up with the plane's locations on radar* ... while the whole airforce had a coffee break for +90 minutes, even though they were aware of the events in NY. This is hard to believe
@@ct5625 Hm. Your aggressive attitude towards open questions on the fall of WTC 7 is not very helpful for a serious discussion. I mean, between the draft and the final report in 2008 NIST had to correct many issues due to those questions. Obvious and dumb errors like constantly mistaking acceleration with speed, but also the denial of the free fall collapse, that was eventually admitted in the final report (for 2.5 secs) without any explanation how this can happen. They still stick to their computer generated model, that looks very different from what we can see on the footage, and does not show a free fall acceleration at any stage of the collapse. So what we can say at least is, that their model is wrong. This is not how the WTC 7 collapsed. So where's the problem when asking for a better model? It would be important for architects and building engineers to know.
They need to release the video of the other cameras showing what exactly hit the Pentagon. I’m still not convinced about the story. Amazing that the only place in the entire Pentagon that was reinforced. and a terrorist just happen to hit that very spot. No wings, no tail section no fuselage was found. And the damage on the building was a giant round hole. No trace that wings hit the building. It’s very bizarre to say the least.
@@Penoatleand you regurgitate nonsense you got from your war criminal government and repeat their lies as fact. It’s not as if elements of the American government were actively seeking war in the Middle East , is it? All they needed was a spark. The paper “plans for an American century” comes to mind, doesn’t it? The foreign policy paper America copied from Israel, or on Israel’s behalf as some people say. The plan to attack 7 countries Iraq, Libya, Syria, Afghanistan etc. culminating in an attack on Iran, the real prize. Guess what? Every one of those countries was either attacked or occupied by America, but it’s all just a conspiracy theory, isn’t it? The same paper says the American people will be opposed to these wars so there will have to be an earth shaking event to get them on board. I wonder what they came up with....🤔
Interesting. So how come no plane wreckage and human passengers were found? Security cameras couldn't even catch any video of anything. Oh yes there were fires, big fires, but a hole in the exterior? Would a plane fit into just a hole?
Your comment responses indicate that you do not question government assertions. Many 9/11 case inspections on UA-cam were taken down by order of the US government. While I am not an expert, there are a few seemingly impossible aspects regarding the Pentagon attack: 1. No plane wreckage was found. 2. There is no camera footage showing any jet entering the Pentagon. 3. Airline pilots claim it is impossible for a large passenger plane to hit the Pentagon in the manner it was described, as the jet cannot be parallel to the ground like a missile. 4. The section of the Pentagon that was hit had its computers and documents removed the month prior to 9/11. 5. The hole in the Pentagon was smaller than the diameter of the plane. 6. The light poles that were supposedly knocked down by the plane were not located in the path of the alleged impact area. 7. There is no existing video footage of a plane heading towards the Pentagon. 8. Guards at the Pentagon reported not seeing any planes descending that day. 9. The section that was hit had a limited number of Pentagon personnel present. These are just a few points, and I am not an expert, but it seems that the US government misled the American people about the truth of 9/11.
It hit the first floor and it wasn't a 747. Maximum height of the 757 is 44 feet at the top of the tail. And the tail would have been one of the first things to break off upon impact. Very consistent with the most of the damage and deaths were on the 1st and 2nd floors.
I think it was a plane, but it wasn't Flight 77. Likely a remote-controlled military plane disguised as Flight 77 that hit the Pentagon, with nobody inside. It appears to match with the damage shown in photos from the incident where it's not covered by smoke or fire hosing.
@@henryford2950 Small unmanned military plane yes, possibly with AA paintjob, although the 'eyewitness' accounts are hilarious, contradictory and likely made up!
'MIraculous' ....Dramatic irony is oozing from the lips of player? 9/11, odds are 1/365 days of the year . The 'best side of the Pentagon being the outer side of ring E' Five sided rings of a pentagon with an inner and outer face =5 x 2 x 5= 50 Odds so far 50 x 365 = 1in 18,250 being generous.... Now to factor in New York developers, structural engineers and contractors coming up with the idea of 2 towers (briefly the tallest in the world) to look awesome while being designed so skillfully that the lronworkers didn't notice that the 'Jenga joining idea 'was being tried out for novelty ! This is disrespectful to the guys who made those buildings. Try me with a sensible question please, respects to those without engineering background, it's easy to be taken in by the first conspiracy theory we are told if our fastest real world impacts we have witnessed live are car accidents
In response to the terrorist attacks on 9/1/2001, the USA spent US$2.5 trillion to arm the Taliban and is working hard to move the entire Afghanistan to the USA.
I believe they did go to the top of the twin towers but due to smoke they couldn't get close and they couldn't see anyone. Thats what I heard on a documentary. I was only a baby at the time so I think its important for me to learn about it as I don't have any memory of it.
@@erinsmith6815 Your correct they were trying to see if anyone was able to saved that way, just impossible task because of the smoke. I recommend Frontline documentary about 9-11 and also the one about why did the twin towers buildings failed is very important to understanding the events. Take care and stay safe.
@@louiserose2609 Thankyou very much for the recommendation I will look into it! I've watched Fire House on Disney+ which was very eye-opening and im currently watching a documentary on Netflix which talks about events before and after 9/11, including the Pentagon and flight 93 which i believe aren't covered as much as the Twin Towers. Sorry for my ranting im just very passionate about it. Hope you stay safe too :)
@@erinsmith6815 Glad to help. I knew quite few people that died and were there as EMT's and Police Officers...Learning from many reliable sources is the best way to understand history...
On 9/11, my dad worked at the FAA. There was a scheduling issue, and his morning meeting at the Pentagon was moved to later that afternoon, ultimately saving his life. I've never been more grateful for disorganization.
My dad was part of that renovation project. He put up those walls to be specific. He would have been there on that day but his team was sent to another project and were scheduled to come back the next day. Him and his company rebuilt that section and reinforced the rest of the Pentagon for the next 10 years.
Your dad and his co-workers saved lives by the reinforcement
Woah
Not renovation work. It was fortification work.
Your dad is a hero that saved lives. SALUTE!
So did it look like a plane had hit the Pentagon or a missile ? Was he even even allowed to say?
I have a very good friend who is alive today because of this renovation. Thank you to the engineers who made that possible!
My cousin was in the area that was hit an hour before the tragedy. He had retired but was visiting friends, many of which didn't survive. Between survivers guilt and depression from the loss of friends, he never got over it in his lifetime.
Understood. It was a very bad day. Blessing to your uncle.
I am so sorry about your loss both before and after. I hope his soul has been healed with reunion with his loved ones and with his friends
@@bobscott4909 cousin
I've been looking at these footages every time i can't see a plane!
Imagine the survivors, the PTSD they must have..War can be compared to this
I'm sorry to everyone's families. We'll never forget you!
War can’t be compared to this at all. Millions have died in wars, and they are ongoing, sometimes for years. War is far worse.
@@tr7938 Out of 3,000 people? Yeah sorry, can't remember 3,000 peoples names when i can barely remember my family members names. But that doesn't mean i don't care for the people.
It was a tragedy for everyone involved. But why didn’t they invade Saudi Arabia instead of Afghanistan? Bin Laden was a Saudi, the hijackers were all Saudi nationals and the funding came from the Saudis, why would you then invade Afghanistan? It could be argued they were following some pre-planned foreign policy objective and only needed a “trigger” event to push through their plans. It could certainly be interpreted that way, couldn’t it?
@@karmabomb3768 Kinda, yeah. But look at ISIS. Where they were (potentially) headquartered from, where they did business, but (for your argument) where they drew combatants from.
Just look on innocent FB groups, it isn't hard to find someone ragging on the US.
@@dylanpeterson6192 it isn’t hard to be raging at America because they’re the biggest warmongers on the planet and either officially or unofficially are engaged in almost constant warfare.
Thank you for showing this again...it was a sad day and never will be forgotten.
I worked in a small furniture store and we were told not to watch tv. My boss Mitzi showed up and we left it on. When she came in she automatically started in on us about it. I looked at her and said, Mitzi, do you not know that America is under attack? I said there are 1000's of people dead, and it's not over. It was about 10:00, but we didn't know. Anyway, she didn't realize, she'd been listening to her music. After watching it for a while she left in tears, said she had to go check on her kids. We all wanted to go hug our kids. Anyway anyone grown that went through that day with any compassion will never be the same, never. Take care and God bless.
@@sandyworkman3025 I was home sick from work that day ... watching TV and saw it happening. I got on the phone with an elderly women friend who I knew would be watching also to comfort her, which was hard to do because I was just as upset. What's strange I was home sick on the first time of the bombing of the world trade center...watched the TV that day also. Still is so upsetting to all of us that watched and felt helpless!
Take care and stay safe.
RIP to every soul that perished that day sending condolences to bravehearts of USA and the entire world from India 🇮🇳❤🇺🇸
Thank you 🙏🏼 India is a good friend of ours 🙏🏼❤️🇺🇸🇮🇳
✌🏽 an engineer
Thank you🙏🏻🥰
Thank you! India is wonderful.
🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
Prayers of healing for those who made it, blessings.
I'm impressed by you not moving your hands around like you were in need of a conductor stick. So much of that on tv today that I change the channel.
The only section that was reinforced.
I don't ask " Why?" He said, " I just say," Thank you". What few words but with wisdom.
Do you know how to use quotation marks?
After the first World Trade Center attack in late 90’s there was an engineer documentary I watched. I remember thinking damn they just told someone how to drop the towers. The engineers explained how the towers w have to be hit not at the bottom but 3/4 of the way up. The show literally explained exactly how to successfully bring the towers down. I’d be willing to bet those behind 9-11 saw that same documentary.
Yes, those behind who stood to make a killing financially and politically...
You remember the name of the documentary? On what channel you've seen it? Anything?
I totally believe you. I think we give out way too much information . I don’t know what is wrong with this country.
I saw that, too. On 9/11, I was screaming at the TV to move everyone away from around the buildings.
There ia one documentry explaining all these conspiracy theories.. Anatomy of a great deception. After seeing this documentary my perception about the 9/11 attack & world is completely changed 🙄🙄
WoW! Impressive how the engineers strategies helped saved peoples lives. I still get chills thinking how awful that day was. I wish everyone peace and those who didn’t make it a restful peace.
Showing the world how they're designing the Pentagon to resist a terrorist attack doesn't endanger national security but showing you video from more than one Pentagon camera or confiscated privately owned footage of the attack does?
80 sets of cameras but the Pentagon wont release any footage!!???
I wonder why we are not the no 1 military any more.
There is probably a good reason they don't want anyone to know what is on that surveillance footage. What could that be?
@@tnasburypl
Gee, almost as if propaganda is not a thing and cameras existing does not mean they actually function.
All the video was released years ago.
"....destroyed the first and part of the second floor...." I don't understand how a 757 only destroys the first floor, when in NY, comparable planes took out many floors at once.
👍?! 👍From Czech Republik
Angle of impact, building construction, speed, etc.
@@MrDefreese Don't bother. OP Probably thinks there should be stars behind the astronauts in the Apollo 11 Moon landing photos, too.
what's even crazier is that there wasn't a single jet called to survey an intruding commercial plane that's heading towards the pentagon. Failure on all accounts of defense.
There was a training exercise going on that day, plus the airspace was chaos. I highly recommend a video here that has the audio of the entire day of air traffic controllers dealing with the plane traffic.
@@ElizabethT45 those exercises were done on purpose to allow certain things to happen.
@@markbrinton6790 I'm not doing conspiracy theories with you. It was a regularly scheduled training exercise.
@@ElizabethT45 keep your head in the sand. The amount of "coincidences" on that day is staggering. And most people don't even realize how many there are. Truly sad.
@@markbrinton6790 just shut up with your conspiracy theories! I'm so sick of people like you trying to twist the story to make thinks worse and blame the government when the terrorists have already claimed responsibility!
There are a lot of cameras but it's all classified . Release them already
I thought Trump promised to unclassify all of that in his 2016 platform. What happened?
@@B_Bodziak a President doesn't have that kind of power.
How did Tower 7 come down with no contact with any aircraft.
Mr Silverstein??
@@fouadmas5413 insurance Scam on that all about $$$$$$$$ Benjamin's for him. Mortal Sin
but but,, that would be anti semitic
Science and engineering logistics and design is amazing, so cool to see it saved lives on this horrific day. Hopefully soon they can make blast proof buildings and certain terror attacks woulnt be possible anymore in our country.
imagine the trauma… ):
as for the PENTAGON, in that huge building this amazing plane (cruise missle) just happened to hit the room where the records were stored the day after Sec of Defense Rumsfeld stated there is 3 TRILLION DOLLARS UNACCOUNTED FOR.
and if im not mistaken, im pretty sure that there was even people investigating thos trillions at the time the "plane" hit, "cough missile cough" xD
@@firstlast1736 there's video there are just not showing classified material!!! HELLO! The more security footage of the pentagon they expose... the easier for terrorists to exploit what they see and try again . If you can see security footage of such a secure location, so can terrorists. Why would they show us where the SECURITY cameras are for the central unit of America's military???? Please stop repeating things you've heard from others and show some respect for this awful day.
your poor understanding of how cruise missiles work would be hilarious if it wasn't so pathetic.
@@firstlast1736 There are two general types of explosive ordinance (bombs, missiles, etc) . Most, are what's considered surface, or near surface detonation - where the device explodes shortly before impact, sending shrapnel and force in all directions.
The other type are for specialty applications such as destroying runways or bunkers. In this case, such weapons use a secondary rocket to crash through the surface, and then explode.
In other words- as far as damage goes, you either have explosion damage or tunneling and *then* explosion damage.
Neither explains the damage to the pentagon. Maybe, if the exterior damage was all there was, it would at least be a possibility. But after the explosion whatever hit the pentagon, proceeded to tunnel completely through 2 of its rings, before penetrating a third. No military ordinance would do such a thing, mostly because there's no point.
A jetliner would though. Jet fuel exploding as its tanks in the wings rupture, as said wings are ripped back. Meanwhile the fuselage continues plowing through the building until it expends the rest of its forward momentum.
@@firstlast1736 show me a single video that shows it was a cruise missile.
Weird how the most secure place in the world don't have any CCTV of the plane strike I wonder how many camera's that building has around it and they had to go across the street and dr.up 2 frames wow
"Bright as the sun?"
"Oh brighter, like a stove"
Since when has a stove been brighter than the sun 😂
😂😂😂
😆
1. The Pentagon was the most protected and secured area in the world.. How is it possible that a (civilian) plane approached it without any reaction ?
2..How is it possible that the plane hit the most protected part of this huge complex ?
3. How is it possible that an alleged commercial airliner had anything to do with the impact?
How is it that 20 years later, not a single piece of evidence has shown anything except a plane hit the building?
How is it that 300+ eye witnesses all report seeing a plane?
If it wasn't a plane, what happened to the plane was hijacked and all its passengers?
If it wasn't a plane, why not? Could the attackers only hijack 3 planes but not 4?
How is it that in a building FULL of military experts, not a single whistleblower has ever said anything except a plane hit the building?
How is it that the survivors and the families of the dead haven't claimed anything but a plane hit the building?
Where did the plane debris on the grounds come from?
Was there a truck full of fuselage parts and burnt seats waiting nearby to drive up to a burning building and scatter the debris in front of first responders and thousands of eye witnesses?
How is it that Truthers can be so ridiculous?
Because the government allowed it. Kinda strange how America is so well defended that after the first "plane" crashed, they did nothing about the others. Corrupt MFs
Because there are airports near there. 🤦♂️
They painted a bullseye on it, see... They think we're really this stupid.
Can someone explain to me why there were emergency fighter jets in Massachusetts and southern Virginia, but not at Andrew’s Air Force base right outside DC?
There were four airbases to cover the eastern section of the continental US so they were spaced to cover that area. Langley was covering an area near DC and also the ADIZ off the coast.
@@clinteranovic8075 no, there were only 2 bases in the Northeast Sector that stationed emergency fighters, one of which was Langley , VA, in the extreme southeast corner of the sector. Please look this stuff up before responding.
@@kevin6293 I said the eastern section of the continental US , not the northeast sector. And to answer your question you could look this up
"In February 1993, Gen. Colin Powell, U.S. Army, the chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff, determined that, because of the greatly reduced Soviet threat, “the United States no longer needed a large, dedicated air defense force.” He therefore recommended that the number of dedicated Air National Guard units assigned to the continental air defense mission “be sharply reduced or eliminated” and that the mission should be carried out “by dual tasking existing active and reserve general-purpose fighter and training squadrons in the Air Force, the Navy, and the Marine Corps.” In a report sent on May 3, 1994, to the chairmen of the U.S. Senate and U.S. House armed services committees and subcommittees on defense appropriations, the General Accounting Office-as the General Accountability Office was then called-supported Powell’s recommendations, concluding that
“A dedicated continental air defense force is no longer needed.”
Wow! Even after all of this time, I had no idea! I literally had no idea they had reinforced the building. But it is quite... odd that the ONE part of the building that got the reinforcement was the only part of the building that got hit.
Not odd. Divine Intervention.
@@lisamarieashby2523 If there was such a thing as “Devine intervention”, 9/11 never would’ve happened.
Yes it supposedly hit the accounting area, hmmm
N just one day after rumsfeld said were missingvoverca trillion dollars???
@@chuckppyro3137
Actually, the missing money, which wasn't, had been mentioned since February 2001.
@@Penoatle The missing money which wasn't? You sound like rumsfield lol. Known unknowns?
what was the name of the company that removed the jet ??? how many people were on that plane ?? where were they taken . Where is the luggage ??? where did the plane go ???
There’s pictures, look it up yourself and stop asking silly questions in UA-cam videos
@@Syd448 The original pictures have been taken down, No wing damage, and no wings,
you should also ask' where is the plane? or do I mean cruise missile.?
…so, where are all of the videos from the security and business cameras pointed at the Pentagon that the FBI collected?
@John Martin Good on ya Mr Martin however, you may be “ in your grave” b4 they fulfill your FOIA request!
What really hit the pentagon?
Where is the fuselage? Wings? Engine? Passangers? Seats? Luggage?
These things dont evaporate!
There was a documentary,,, idk, saying that THE WRECKAGE WAS REMOVED ASAP,and disposed of.
You do understand that typical plane crashes mostly occur during take off and landing, at normal speeds. These planes were intentionally picked to have maximum fuel loads and went in full throttle.
@@alperdue2704 If full fuel load was an issue, then why did they flew across the whole country and back again before crashing into the Pentagon? Does not make any sense to me.
@@cyanah5979 They didn’t. Planes turned over NJ and PA. No where close to across the country. This would put them on target with as close as possible to full tanks. Why does this matter? What makes a bigger explosion and fire; full or empty tanks.
@@alperdue2704 Here is the flight path of AA Flight 77:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Airlines_Flight_77#/media/File:Flightpath-AA77.gif
So they unnecessarily wasted around 90 minutes of fuel in a flight bound to LA. Again, this does not make sense at all; even more, the chance of being detected and intercepted became higher with every minute in flight.
"After the plane hit"
Out of control fires with no visible flames… yeah sounds legit.
“The steel melted away” I mean honestly… this guy isn’t even trying
hmmm. i would love to see some video footage of the impact from the multiple cameras that were visible in photos of roof of the pentagon. but weve only ever been shown a poor quality video from a local gas station.
Why should they when you nut jobs will just claim anything that doesn't fit your narrative is "fake"?
@@ct5625 Might I suggest you rethink the question of, "why should they".
Exactly. One of the most secure buildings on Earth has to use the CCTV from a gas station? When you say it out loud it seems even more unbelievable. My neighbour’s house has more home security than the Pentagon, it seems, if you believe what they’re telling you. Doesn’t ring true, does it?
@Edin Latic
Many aircraft pieces were found.
Do you honestly think a piece of what is essentially aluminum, traveling at over 500mph and hitting a solid object would just bounce off?
You are disrespectful for accepting nonsense you read online and accepting it as fact without any research.
@@karmabomb3768
Ah yes, the mysterious "they".
You know someone is a productive member of society when they always bring up a "they".
Go outside and touch grass.
My birthday is 11 September...and I still don't know how I am supposed to celebrate it after all of this.
buy a cupcake
This is your birthday and has nothing to do with the terrorist attack. Celebrate your birthday and enjoy your life👍👍
The best thing you can do is have fun on your birthday. Every birthday if we look at history would have an awful event that happened. Mine is Sandy Hook not born the same year, but still feels awful to think about those children and my dogs was born 9-11. Take care and stay safe!
The people who died that day would want you to celebrate!!!
No parts of the plane visible at all??
Strange because you can find them online
@@mikebyrd8278 yea just like that one really clear video of the “plane” hitting it, all those cameras around the pentagon and we get one from the security stand 150yards away. Wake up 🤡
What an awesome report. I will never forget that day.
@@keanudarkly9497 And what is bin Laden saying about that TODAY? You praise the US Navy pilots revealing their visuals of UFOs, yet denigrate the US in a subsequent comment. Get back to us when you've matured.
So Awesome!! They talked about the black box found! And the engines of the plane! Wow so real!!
You people got sht for brains!!
Wow. I was going to turn 24 and I remember that this tragedy just completely ruined my birthday. But not because of selfishness, but because everything was just so gloomy and terrifying.
*I'm right now 28, let's get married, I propose you on Internet baby...It takes guts to do that. 🙏🙏*
@@Sunil778-l4c ❤⚘
I was 9
@@dall9329 Awww.. then you probably don't remember much!
edye ann I remember everything, because I was at school when it's happened. The teacher told us what has just happened. I don't remember all the details. But at 9 turning 10 you know everything
Thank Heaven for these people who had the foresight to reinforce that part of the building. When 9/11 happened, it was more shocking for me than I can ever admit. I suffered from depression from this event for months. RIP to all who lost their lives! God bless all who suffered in this horrible thing!
Me, too. For months after, I would find myself crying, even though I was not personally affected by 9/11. This was somethin which would come totally out of the blue. 9/11 was just horrible. A friend of mine said she saw the plane fly low over her house (she lives not too far from the Pentagon. I pray we never see anything like this again.
Because it was an inside job is the most depressing aspect of it all.
@@misterrees why do you say?? Do you have more info??
Just lookup nine 11 inside job there is information going back over 16 years.
Aww you were depressed?? If you could at least see how you were completely lied to you'd know what depression is
Great work
Thank you.
The only real miracle is how the plane disappeared into thin air
Who told you that nonsense??
@@rogerwilco5918 perhaps the absences of a gigantic Boeing 757 in the cavity of the Pentagon 🤔🤔
@@imaxximmink2098
A 757 which is made out of aluminum which is not the most durable material to hit a solid object and survive.
There are pictures of the Jets online along with black box information they also identified all of the passengers and crew except for five
AMERICA WILL NEVER FORGET NEVER
good inside job
Where is the plane..engine or tail..I can't see anything
Exactly True friend
This has already been explained and your "theories" debunked. But you know this already, you just can't let go of your delusions.
@@u.s.m.c.fewproudthemarines2987
I'm just being honest mate...
If the plane crashed where are the engines and if the plane did crash the impact explosion would have debris scattered around the surrounding area as well as the trajectory of the plane should have caused more damage ...instead it's seems to be only part of the exterior of the building....
The irony is that there was something that happened on September 11 in the year 1941....
Isn't it ironic....
All I know is that American foreign policy destroys peoples culture identity cities communities... infrastructure and sovereign counties ....
Yet the Chinese are actually building infrastructure and development for new emerging economies such as ones in Africa...
America is a cancer on democracies
@@andrewmica1914
Not really.
If you knew facts instead of regurgitating nonsense, you would not be here.
There was no plane. The projectile was a missile, as Donald Rumsfeld said.
Tinfoil hat aside. Have they still not shown more footage to this day? You know from one if not the most secure locations on earth?
1. Not every inch of this building was monitored by CCTV cameras.
2. You've seen footage from outside and you still don't want to believe what happened.
3. You choose to believe unfounded "theories" on the Internet, no evidence required, so why should anyone pander to your nonsense when you're just going to dismiss all reality anyway?
4. Nothing is going to convince you morons that reality is real, you believe anonymous accounts online and self-confessed liars like Alex Jones. Every "theory" you guys put forward has been debunked, a million times. Nothing can be said to make a delusional person accept a reality when they're determined to believe a fantasy.
Every inch? It's an entire side of the 5 sides. All they showed was a camera from the toll machine! You are the delusional one if you think asking for any video is too much. High security places will have all sides covered even if you cannot do facial recognition from every inch.
@@MichaelBylehn Out of curiosity, what makes you believe against the attack or attacks?
@@MichaelBylehn Information regarding the pentagon’s layout, breaching points, and camera placements it’s self can/ are secrets. It holds so much of our information, I think being careful to not show some of it well justified. But what are your views over the footage seen? It covers the attack, there are also photographs of the burning area by others not working encountering the sight, and other such evidence. I’m sorry if I come across as rude, but I’m curious your stance and beliefs’ evidence behind ideas of the attack.
Classified
Wow. The lives saved due to their research….it’s mind boggling that they could create these materials that could do that.
A shame 60 Minutes doesn't produce the same high quality journalism it used to.
@Michael A at least they stopped pandering to insane racist right wingers.
What, because they don't publish nonsense?
@@Penoatle MSM is neither independent or honest. References available
Thank for reminding us all that was lost on 911.
Aww you need a reminder??? You don't even fckn care enough to know the true story
@@jayemeljay2117
Neither do you.
Thank you for republishing these again, 60 Minutes. It's my wish you'd provide as much as you can, if not all. What I appreciate most is while there is bias in reporting, you do your best to just give the facts and trust we, the people, to understand and decide for ourselves.
In fact, I think the quote to you use to sum this article up says it well. "I don't ask why anymore. I just say thank you."
Hahahahahahahaha hahahah "facts" yeah right!!! You ever seen a plane crash site??? Clearly NOT!!
@@jayemeljay2117 I'm only going to reply to you once. I'm open for an opposing point of view, but I do not tolerate willful lies. Besides, your words are an attempt to belittle and mock. That already proves you're a liar and a fraud.
1) You assumed I've never seen a crash of any sort or a plane crash. You don't know me. It's arrogant of you to assume. For the record, I've seen over twenty, including four which have impacted buildings.
2) You tried to disparage that anything provided were facts. There is a difference between opinion and fact. Example: were those people who they claimed they were? Yes. Did such events happen on the days stated? Yes. Were such materials and methods used as reported? Yes.
3) I've seen many computerized models. I've also pointedly asked if people added in every bit of relevant information, such as the materials used in both points of impacts. Often, the answer is 'no.' That means the results were calculated on items effectively made of paper.
Conclusion: people will see what they want to see. I can't say for certain since your mockery and derision are the only things I have to deduce from you. However, that's still a fair amount of evidence. You jumped to conclusions. You demonstrate contempt. You demonstrate anger.
Until I see evidence otherwise, I am under the working conclusion you are yet another liar and fraud who hates 'Western Ideology' yet uses the natural willingness to discuss against it. I've met too many willful puppets to put up with the indoctrinated zealotry. You're entitled to an opinion, true. You're even allowed to speak your opinion. However, you also are required to back up your opinion with facts and consideration to other people.
In short, I am not impressed with your self-righteous contempt which I have seen, nor by your intelligence which I have not seen.
You are dismissed.
@@jayemeljay2117
Have you?
Clearly not.
What about PSA 1771. Which one of your "brothers" hijacked and crashed after being fired for his propensities.
Not much wreckage. Did it not happen?
Much forensic evidence was despoiled. However enough remains to request an independent enquiry.
Presumably a higher level of expertise might be considered.
The 'Jenga' collapse belonging in primary education
Mad and sad day
What year is it now?
Not a sinle photo of the plane. Truely a miracle.
Very true. Which is odd.
But, there are dozens of eye witnesses accounts of actually seeing the plane before impact.
So hard to find the truth in all of this
@@fredricksmith-something.2125 They might have seen a plane near the Pentagon. But not crashing into it.
There are numerous pictures of jet parts
@@mikebyrd8278 Donald Rumsfeld was photographed helping to move a fuselage piece on the lawn if l remember
@@davepowell7168 that is true
Where are the scorch marks on the lawn or disturbed turf?
Someone please explain to me where is the debris from the plane???
Pulverized. An aluminum plane going through that kind of reinforcement would have done just that. Like taking a massive sheet of aluminum foil and crumpling it up to a tiny ball, except with the explosion of jet fuel and fire it would have melted and burned instead. Have you watched footage of homes falling into swift moving water during flash floods? It takes about 5-10 seconds for the building to be pulverized into tiny pieces of debris. Stuff like that is just a ten thousandth of the proportional damage done in the Pentagon attack.
@@lisamarieashby2523 Stick built homes are no comparison to a commercial airplane. Where are the wings? No visible damage besides the central hole. It was a huge missile.
On the internet
@@NoSpamForYoucan you prove that?
The Miracle is that according to the official story an amateur pilot who was on a suicide mission took the time and effort to maneuver the plane in a perfect downward spiral descent thousands of feet and perfectly binging the plane in just above the ground!!! wow!!
and even the most skillful pilots have tested this in flight sim and never succeded, and their words "this is impossible"..
Wtf are you babbling about??
Don't start nonsense.
@@AleczDj
Because cessna pilots know anything about 757s...
I seen a pilot with thousands of hours of flying experience try to recreate the flight path on a simulator. He either flipped the plane over or crashed into the ground and ended up deeming it impossible. Yet they tell us an amateur pilot who had minimal training managed to pull this off first time. Just another piece of the jigsaw that doesn’t fit the picture, one of the many, many pieces that don’t.
Good to know this is happening behind the scenes.
Check out BBC building 4 they reported that the building was down while it was still standing behind them while still talking then what happens 35min later the building falls
The BBC explains that on their website
where is the plane. plane engine, seats wings, seat belts, dead bodies, wheels etc, it was a missile.
@ChangingTides777having the final answer is more important than the feelings of the victims families.
Are there any photos of the "big Parts" of the plane? A B757 is a big aircraft, big parts like engines, landing gear, tail should be recognizable after the crash....
Reinforced so greatly that no airplane parts or people were found after the crash 🤔
Not true, look it up yourself there’s pictures. Y’all do no research for acting so knowledgeable
No camera’s at the pentagon show any airplane to boot. Funny how one of the most supposed secured buildings in the world cant produce video. If you want to be sheep, go right ahead. I have done much research. Do the research yourself on what an airplane crash suppose to look like. Dont be so gullible.
I'd feel safe going back!! ✌🏻💗😊❣️
Why would anyone advertise this information?
It's 20 yrs old
They think we're really, really stupid.
All of the missed signals, signs of an inept beuracracy.
Can’t video a Jet if it was never there
@@Gab3A ouch
As well as willful negligence, at the very least.
The Miracle of One Camera on the Pentagon!
*WHERE IS THE CLEAR VIDEO OF THE PLANE???????*
The miracle is that no plane hit the building?
Says the conspiracy videos on UA-cam
@@mikebyrd8278 Provide a single peice of evidence, says educated people.
@@이이-n4z8y well there are tons of pictures of jet debris on the internet. There are tons of interviews with people who saw the jet crashed into the building. There's recordings from the air traffic controllers watching the jet on radar and saw it crash into the building. A C130 pilot also wants to crash into the building. The Black box information is available online. They also identified everybody that was killed in the Pentagon except for five people.
@@mikebyrd8278 Not a single picture
@@mikebyrd8278 Not a single thing you wrote is factual.
I’m sure now they come up with even better now
The real miracle is, that there is nothing left of a plane.
Who believes all this ?
Yes there was.
@@justbecause9645
That’s the US narrative ….
But the US officials lie as soon as they breath.
@@justbecause9645 show us?
@@n.r.2258 Who told you that nonsense???
@@rogerwilco5918
Tons of video content and non of that showed the remaining of one of the Pratt & Whitney JT9D-7R4.
Perhaps it was a glider plain that hit the pentagon.
Or can you show me just on picture with the remaining jet engine ?
You’re just a believer 🤣
"The plane vaporized"
back to the video games Sherlock.
Missile.
Yeah I've seen the photos and conspiracy. And given the lack of better photos of where the plane hit, it's plausible to think it was not a plane. Where are the engines etc. But I don't know. It very well might have been a plane and occams razor points to that too.
Yep , let's disregard the plane.
May as well disregard tower 7 without any aircraft impact
@@fouadmas5413 all buildings were pre-wired for demo the planes and missiles and drones were for special effect.
That plane (missle) just happen to take out everyone that was investigating the missing TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS
Provide more sources for what you're referring to.
🥴
Says the conspiracy video on UA-cam
Be alert and watch and pray 🙏🙏🙏🕊️.
how lucky... just like wtc building 7 just tumbled like cards...
Demolition and now it's just laser pulse beam.
@@misterrees
How adorable.
I love fairy tales from people who cannot think outside the box.
@@Penoatle so what do you think please enlighten if you think I am in a box and you are operating the tesseract?
@@misterrees
I love fiction.
Tesseract though?
Seriously, do you not have anything more in your life than being a bum who engages in too much nonsense?
Get a job, go out and touch grass.
Yes it tumbled like cards soon after Silverstein said to pull it. Yes I have seen the video and the man said we decided to pull it. Who is we? And how did the explosives get installed on the day of 911?
"The only part reinforced" and "5 days from finish" makes some people wonder.
Only weirdos
I read the book "Stonewalled". I never watched this program or Pelley again.
so many coincidences... like finding the passport that went through one of the towers and landed on the floor undamaged, tower 7, and the lack of videos of the pentagon attack
1. The passport was one piece of evidence found in a mountain of evidence gathered from the biggest crime scene in the world, among the biggest investigation ever conducted. You people imagine someone just miraculously picked up one lone passport in the street, when the reality is that body parts and luggage was smashed out of the other side of the building and covered a wide area. All of that was collected. It's entirely likely they found that passport because it was in the pocket of a body they believed to be a victim - as many of the documents found that day appeared to be.
2. Tower 7 has been explained a thousand times but because you guys have so little to support your stupid "theories" you still cling to it like it's a gospel. The building was severely damaged by debris and fires burning out of control. The crews were ordered out of it because it was unsafe. The building collapsed due to that damage and those fires. The BBC reported that it had fallen because the AP had reported that it was collapsing. The AP incorrectly reported that likely because of confusion on the ground or a misunderstanding. All of this is FAR MORE LIKELY than the thousand bizarre delusions you choose to believe instead.
3. You are not owed videos of the attack. You are not owed HD 4K footage to "analyze" for your own perverse pleasure. You are not entitled to see victims being killed. Even if there were fifty new videos of the Pentagon attack you nut jobs would still be dismissing them all as "fake" because it doesn't suit your mentally defective narratives.
@Daniel Kintigh 😂😂😂 ok 👍
@Daniel Kintigh There was footage released from two Pentagon cameras too, all other cams, so we were told - did not catch the event. None of the released footage does show an airliner, but just the explosion.
*and it lines up with the plane's locations on radar*
... while the whole airforce had a coffee break for +90 minutes, even though they were aware of the events in NY. This is hard to believe
@@ct5625 Hm. Your aggressive attitude towards open questions on the fall of WTC 7 is not very helpful for a serious discussion. I mean, between the draft and the final report in 2008 NIST had to correct many issues due to those questions. Obvious and dumb errors like constantly mistaking acceleration with speed, but also the denial of the free fall collapse, that was eventually admitted in the final report (for 2.5 secs) without any explanation how this can happen. They still stick to their computer generated model, that looks very different from what we can see on the footage, and does not show a free fall acceleration at any stage of the collapse.
So what we can say at least is, that their model is wrong. This is not how the WTC 7 collapsed. So where's the problem when asking for a better model? It would be important for architects and building engineers to know.
@@ct5625 You keep believing what you believe if it makes you feel comfortable!
Thank to good thinking and for miracles.
7:47 that’s not particle board that’s OSB.
'September 11 the new pearl harbor (FULL)' movie by David Ray Griffin, points out all of the anomalies very interesting.
his Ten books bout 911 are all excellent as well !!
Why suggest debunked trash?
If you want great fiction, Harry Potter is a thing.
It was not a plane it was a rocket!
It's weird how there's not one clear video of a plane hitting the Pentagon. I had cameras at my house everywhere but they didn't then? Ok
They have all the video under lock and key.
Or security theatre is a thing.
You know, that thing that makes us feel safe yet does nothing.
They need to release the video of the other cameras showing what exactly hit the Pentagon. I’m still not convinced about the story. Amazing that the only place in the entire Pentagon that was reinforced. and a terrorist just happen to hit that very spot. No wings, no tail section no fuselage was found. And the damage on the building was a giant round hole. No trace that wings hit the building. It’s very bizarre to say the least.
Thank you!!! I really hope you're from USA so at least I know not all is lost.. and not all of you are so stupidly ignorant!
@@jayemeljay2117 Yes I’m from the United States. It’s insane. People don’t even know about building seven? They are asleep
@@randyrauch7066
Wide awake.
You bought into nonsense you read online and regurgirate it as fact.
@@Penoatleand you regurgitate nonsense you got from your war criminal government and repeat their lies as fact. It’s not as if elements of the American government were actively seeking war in the Middle East , is it? All they needed was a spark. The paper “plans for an American century” comes to mind, doesn’t it? The foreign policy paper America copied from Israel, or on Israel’s behalf as some people say. The plan to attack 7 countries Iraq, Libya, Syria, Afghanistan etc. culminating in an attack on Iran, the real prize. Guess what? Every one of those countries was either attacked or occupied by America, but it’s all just a conspiracy theory, isn’t it? The same paper says the American people will be opposed to these wars so there will have to be an earth shaking event to get them on board. I wonder what they came up with....🤔
@@karmabomb3768
I am not an American.
Man, you just rely on dumb conspiracy nonsense to live life and it's sad.
Still don’t get how there’s no footage of the plane coming in low, it’s a tourist area🤷🏼♀️
God Bless❤😭
It s this de security guy in charge of the camaras?
I didnt know a stove was brighter than the sun? Seems legit
👀. 😂
or the "renovations" were setting up for the "plane crash" ...
I would like to see pictures of the plane. The wings and engines are huge. Where are they. The entire plane didn't just disintegrate.
So in the pentagon,they reinforced the building with steel beams, .. kinda like a mini world trade center........ !!! ??
Interesting. So how come no plane wreckage and human passengers were found? Security cameras couldn't even catch any video of anything. Oh yes there were fires, big fires, but a hole in the exterior? Would a plane fit into just a hole?
Ever hear of an internet search engine?
You're embarrassing yourself
Lots of missing bodies that day , nearly three thousand at the World Trade Center
Your comment responses indicate that you do not question government assertions. Many 9/11 case inspections on UA-cam were taken down by order of the US government. While I am not an expert, there are a few seemingly impossible aspects regarding the Pentagon attack:
1. No plane wreckage was found.
2. There is no camera footage showing any jet entering the Pentagon.
3. Airline pilots claim it is impossible for a large passenger plane to hit the Pentagon in the manner it was described, as the jet cannot be parallel to the ground like a missile.
4. The section of the Pentagon that was hit had its computers and documents removed the month prior to 9/11.
5. The hole in the Pentagon was smaller than the diameter of the plane.
6. The light poles that were supposedly knocked down by the plane were not located in the path of the alleged impact area.
7. There is no existing video footage of a plane heading towards the Pentagon.
8. Guards at the Pentagon reported not seeing any planes descending that day.
9. The section that was hit had a limited number of Pentagon personnel present.
These are just a few points, and I am not an expert, but it seems that the US government misled the American people about the truth of 9/11.
The plane crashed destroying documentation on what we did 60 years prior in the ww2.
Bull corn
the same encyclopedia brittanica that omits & hides wtc7?
Those are fake burns. If you make up somebody real good look like they’re burned
Has Lesley Stahl apologized yet for claiming Hunter’s laptop was Russian disinformation?
the pentagon is 71 feet high , 5 stories..
A 747 is 63 ft high..
Why didnt the "plane" hit the upper stories?
You can't even write in legible English, and yet you seem to imagine you're a crime scene investigator.
It hit the first floor and it wasn't a 747. Maximum height of the 757 is 44 feet at the top of the tail. And the tail would have been one of the first things to break off upon impact. Very consistent with the most of the damage and deaths were on the 1st and 2nd floors.
I looked at the footage, the plane was landed on the ground to hit the building
This is tragic😔🇳🇿
What's really tragic is the amount of fckn lies and people believing it... THAT'S tragic
@@jayemeljay2117
You mean like yourself and dumb videos and theories that no sane person would believe.
Living the welfare life must be fun.
Didn't they say 500 mph not it 300 mph? How did they know exactly hot fast the planes were flying?
They know exactly how fast the earth travels thru space down to the hundredth of a milisecond
@@matty8294 how exactly? You have me intrigued now.
Hitting the only re-enforced section.
Luck or planning?
Both. That side faces directly towards Dulles Airport where flight 77 flew out of.
Missile, not a plane!
Take your meds
@@halebop78 paid COINTELPRO troll! Change the record! You give yourselves away too easily!
I think it was a plane, but it wasn't Flight 77. Likely a remote-controlled military plane disguised as Flight 77 that hit the Pentagon, with nobody inside. It appears to match with the damage shown in photos from the incident where it's not covered by smoke or fire hosing.
@@henryford2950 Small unmanned military plane yes, possibly with AA paintjob, although the 'eyewitness' accounts are hilarious, contradictory and likely made up!
It was a plane! I was across the street at the Navy Annex on 9-11. I saw it go over and hit. It was a plane - not a missile.
Sad day remember
'MIraculous' ....Dramatic irony is oozing from the lips of player?
9/11, odds are 1/365 days of the year .
The 'best side of the Pentagon being the outer side of ring E'
Five sided rings of a pentagon with an inner and outer face =5 x 2 x 5= 50
Odds so far 50 x 365 = 1in 18,250 being generous....
Now to factor in New York developers, structural engineers and contractors coming up with the idea of 2 towers (briefly the tallest in the world) to look awesome while being designed so skillfully that the lronworkers didn't notice that the 'Jenga joining idea 'was being tried out for novelty !
This is disrespectful to the guys who made those buildings.
Try me with a sensible question please, respects to those without engineering background, it's easy to be taken in by the first conspiracy theory we are told if our fastest real world impacts we have witnessed live are car accidents
Not many people know that the Pentagon was built on 9/11/1941
Yet another "coincidence".
In response to the terrorist attacks on 9/1/2001, the USA spent US$2.5 trillion to arm the Taliban and is working hard to move the entire Afghanistan to the USA.
Any proof on that??
@@stephaniepiazzese4332 that ur proof there in comment friend
I've always wondered why there weren't any rescue helicopters saving people in the buildings
I believe they did go to the top of the twin towers but due to smoke they couldn't get close and they couldn't see anyone. Thats what I heard on a documentary. I was only a baby at the time so I think its important for me to learn about it as I don't have any memory of it.
@@erinsmith6815 Your correct they were trying to see if anyone was able to saved that way, just impossible task because of the smoke. I recommend Frontline documentary about 9-11 and also the one about why did the twin towers buildings failed is very important to understanding the events. Take care and stay safe.
@@louiserose2609 Thankyou very much for the recommendation I will look into it! I've watched Fire House on Disney+ which was very eye-opening and im currently watching a documentary on Netflix which talks about events before and after 9/11, including the Pentagon and flight 93 which i believe aren't covered as much as the Twin Towers. Sorry for my ranting im just very passionate about it. Hope you stay safe too :)
@@erinsmith6815 Glad to help. I knew quite few people that died and were there as EMT's and Police Officers...Learning from many reliable sources is the best way to understand history...
@@louiserose2609 Oh no I am so sorry to hear that. That must have been very difficult for everyone :(