10 Changes Made to the Bible (Part 2 of 2)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 11 чер 2024
- Hello there guys! This is part 2 of a video that will provide an in-depth examination of how our modern Bible was created and written and how it differs from the ancient texts of thousands of years ago. You will learn how the Bible has been "changed" or "altered" over time and what these changes mean and why they were made - everything from Goliath's Height to Jesus's sayings.
Hope you enjoy and learn something new!
Here's a link to the previous part if you haven't seen it: • 10 Changes Made to the...
Edit:
I have since realized that information in this video should be more properly cited to their original authors, to avoid taking credit for their hard work.
1:36 (Christopher Hitchens, God is Not Great, pg. 121-122)
3:28 (Bart Ehrman, Misquoting Jesus, pg. 75-76)
12:37 (Bart Ehrman, Misquoting Jesus, pg. 78)
23:17 (Christopher Hitchens, God is Not Great, pg. 113)
Intro by Arturo García
Background music:
“Precipice”, “An Evening A Lifetime”, “Looked Back Saw Nothing”, “Not Without the Rest”, “Life in Romance” and "Marxist Arrow" by Twin Musicom (twinmusicom.org)
"Blue Feather" by Kevin Macleod
Citations
Ehrman, Bart D. Misquoting Jesus: the Story behind Who Changed the Bible and Why. New York: Harper, 2005.
Ehrman, Bart D. Whose Word Is It?: the Story behind Who Changed the New Testament and Why. London: Continuum, 2008.
Baruch Halpern, David's Secret Demons (2004)
Finkelstein, Israel. “The Philistines in the Bible: A Late-Monarchic Perspective.” Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, vol. 27, no. 2, 2002.
Yadin, Azzan. “Goliath's Armor And Israelite Collective Memory.” Vetus Testamentum, vol. 54, no. 3, 2004.
Robinson, James, and Richard Douglas Smith. The Nag Hammadi Library in English / James M. Robinson. E.J. Brill, 1996.
Pagels, Elaine (1989). The Gnostic Gospels (PDF). New York: Random House. p. xx.
Hitchens, Christopher (2007), God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything, New York: Twelve Books, ISBN 9780446579803 . - Наука та технологія
![ПОЛНАЯ ИСТОРИЯ ЭКЗОРЦИЗМА [Топ Сикрет]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/qBySr6Bt0B8/mqdefault.jpg)
Sorry for some reason the video rendered in 720p. I'm not sure what happened but hopefully it's not that big of a deal!
Edit:
I messed up a little bit in Number 1 when I was referring to the Gospel of Judas, the Gnostics, and the Nag Hammadi library. I oversimplified a lot in the essence of time and as a result a lot of nuance was lost, but the gist of it is largely correct. For example, I should have stated that not all the texts (like the Gospel of Judas, the Wisdom of Jesus Christ, and the Gnosis of the Invisible God) were discovered in the Nag Hammadi library but were discovered at different Gnostic sites/excavations.
There were also a lot of other factors that determined what ended up as "canon" in early Christianity such as general popularity which I should have mentioned.
Check out this great video if you want so more info: ua-cam.com/video/SCy7NuujCLc/v-deo.html
I will return to biology/cryptid/dinosaur videos in the next few videos. Don't worry ;)
I blame the Antichrist. He jealous
@@TREYtheExplainer paleo profile
I messed up a little bit in Number 1 when I was referring to the Gospel of Judas, the Gnostics, and the Nag Hammadi library. I oversimplified a lot, but the gist of it is correct. For example, I should have stated that texts like the Gospel of Judas, the Wisdom of Jesus Christ, and the Gnosis of the Invisible God were not discovered in the Nag Hammadi library but were discovered at similar different sites/excavations.
@TREY after researching all these inconsistencies and changes with the bible, have you found that the majority of the rest is kept consistent? From the oldest to newest texts? It would be cool to just review those texts to see what’s been consistently recorded throughout the generations.
I would love a series where you go over some of the books that weren’t included!
Ditto~!!!
@maria sierra dude that's some high quality bulshit
Please make it happen Trey! It would be amazing
the dead sea scrolls translated by García Martinez and the Nag Hammadi. those are the books you are looking for
maria sierra Where do you find those?
The three women told nobody about what they had seen and heard. Except, of course, for Mark who was then able to report it.
Maybe the man in the robe told Mark
@BMore not a single historian says that the Gospel of Mark is fiction, so you are contradicting the most intelligent biblical historians.
@@aidan-ator7844 The "Historical" accuracy of the Bible is still being questioned to this day by many people, so I don't know what you mean with "not a single historian"
the gospels of Matthew, Luke and John elaborate on things that happened after the women go to the tomb. not only that, but if you read the actual passage in Mark, it can be surmised that the ending where the women tell no one refers to the immediate timeframe of them experiencing these supernatural events and that when enough time had passed for them to calm down, they eventually told people which leads to the accounts in Matthew, Luke and John.
@@eliasredlich3425 certain aspects are questioned but if you are completely unbiased, you will realise that the Bible is historically accurate.
I actually liked the clifhanger version of the ending more, not only it's a callback to the the beginning of Mark, but also to the story of Adam and Eve which tells a story of about choosing either obey or not to obey the commands of the lord, definitely puts the bible into a whole new different perspective or perhaps strengthening it's supposed theme.
the discussion about "which ending is the best?" kind of misses the point of "which ending is the truth?"
What's clear is that the cliffhanger isn't the end of the story, because we somehow still got to know what happened
Right. The empty feeling that comes at the end of the book of Mark might be preferable to a storyteller, but it obviously cannot be a real account.
@@gz6963 To be honest, probably only a very small portion of the bible is factually correct, and most of it that has some grain of truth to it is heavily distorted, exaggerated or mistranslated. The bible isn't a history book after all, it's a collection of stories, that in a lot of cases were passed orally before being written down, then translated into a bunch of different languages and changed by people with their own interests in mind
Mark writing a all time classic master piece be like: ✍️🔥🔥✍️🔥
I also like the cliffhanger a lot. It is a very poignant and powerful message.
The note about Jesus’ stern character in Mark is actually really relevant to the Nag Hammadi texts: one argument against their validity is Jesus constantly getting stern in tone and even annoyed with his disciples in a few of the books, but there are several other instances throughout the original Bible that highlight that Jesus wasn’t always calm and gentle (him becoming irate and flipping tables of merchants comes to mind).
because he was only human to begin with! but imagine being The Jesus of Nazareth in early history times 😂 where 80% of the world would be illiterate - and even your closest friends can't grasp what you're saying? id get irate, too.
@@jaygarcia6338I thought he was also god?
Showing his human side. Christians do believe he was both man and god.
@@fairsaa7975
Christians believe he was both.
Righteous anger concerning what was then seen as the Temple of God , until after the crucifixion, when we ( our body and soul ) become the temple to house God directly , and so commune directly.
None of this information is secret or even controversial. I find it incredibly deceptive how most churches are so quiet about this.
Sometimes it's through straight up sanctioned ignorance. I remember being told in some of my theology courses that evangelical Christianity tends not to believe that people need education on the Bible.
The main concern is that if people need study in order to believe, then very few will actually do so. (Whether this is motivated by opposition to gatekeeping or opposition to losing out on revenue is a case by case issue.)
"Knowledge is power." Whoever has control of the truth can use it as a tool. Those who are denied the whole truth, thusly, also are denied some power, and yet, believing they are wise, themselves may be used as tools to convert and control others, until eventually, the partial truths are understood to be entire, when cognoscenti know, they are imperfect. Rulers in many societies around the world have been unscrupulous, using people's ignorance to gain and hold power, which also translates into monetary power, which is even stronger than mere words. "Power corrupts, and Absolute Power corrupts absolutely." Jesus's entire point was to have people gain their own, individual understandings of his deity concept by seeking ecstatic experiences, as he himself did, by various ascetic acts, such as going into the desert to "confront the devil." This shamanic approach is in direct opposition to rulers' power. Jesus was a rabbi in an oral Aramaic sect, which lay outside the confines of stricter, liturgical sects of Judaism at the time.
Because they don't want people questioning the status quo. Educated people ask difficult questions.
Christianity is largely an overlay to peoples everyday lives - that is they don't often believe it, but it's just there. Look at Christianity in other cultures, and you will see they have mingled Christianity with pre existing local beliefs, mainly in an attempt by the church to become relevant to the locals.
Because religion is based off deception
@@jaciobe Organised religion is. Tribal cults are just shared beliefs. Neo-Pagans run a gamut from trying to rival organised, corrupted systems, to being simple, personal systems, using shamanic techniques to achieve ecstasy, and see the divine within ourselves and others. It's not all the same, and not all religious people are pretending, even if many are misguided. There isn't one "true" religion. There's just Science, and our Ultimate Creator's language is DNA codons, crafting ecosystems via evolution. People need to get back to understanding that we aren't apart from Nature, we're a part of Nature. There isn't anything more, other than meditative navel gazing.
I can't believe Trey released a part 2 before the bibble did.
The bibble XD sounds like a water Pokémon lol
The New Testament anyone?
The Bible has a part two, it just came out a while ago. Really good stuff tho
@@henrypowers8326 I always felt part 2 was very inconsistent
"SECOND COMING" SOON: THE BIBBLE 2.0!! NOW WITH 65% MORE SALVATION!! IF YOU DON'T PREORDER, YOU MUST BE A SODOMITE!!
Not religious but I really like this level of care and concern because it not only teaches biblical history, but the thoughts and morals of those who passed it down with their changes. Thank you trey
0:09 - Intro
0:22 - Review of a few changes (from prior video, Part 1)
1:05 - #5 - The Missing Adulteress (John 8)
3:53 - #4 - Compassion or Anger? (Mark 1:41)
7:08 - #3 - The Ominous Original Ending (Mark 16:9-20 VS... Matthew 28:1-10, John 20:1-13)
14:19 - #2 - Rapid Fire Round (Matthew 16:2-3; Matthew 27:34; 2Samuel 21:19; Mark 6:3)
19:47 -#1 - Books Removed (Nag Hammadi & Gnostic writings etc)
Goat
Thank you!
Bottom line>? All guesswork & more falsification to what is claimed as the word of a God. The only undeniable FACT is it ALL was written by humans. Now add in the admitted alterations & removal of some parts & face the true reality of today's "Holy Bible" , an altered FALSE edition of an extremely old book, used throughout history to commit sins against others.
At the present time, being year 2022, the two most violently & "sinfil" religions or groups of people that claim to follow & believe in this book, throughout history are the:
"Holy Catholic Church", run by the Vatican
and
"Islam/Sharia Law", under present control by a mixed group of warrior fanatics (Taliban, Al Queda,selfproclaimed prophets & Shahs, etc.) claiming to be muslems of some kind.
Both groups are full of lying self-centered control freaks, ass-kissing wannabe's, sexual predators & pedophiles, from the very top to the living slaves at the bottom.
Hopefully all followers of these "religeons" will suffer in the worst of all the Hells they "believe" in
@@anthonystevens3961 time to return to the kids' table, son.
The gnostic writings weren’t removed they were never part of the Bible at all. This guy is such a hack
"Whatever God told people to do, they would do the opposite."
Suddenly Life of Brian seems pretty on the nose.
@Never Surrender1248 Said no atheist, ever.
@Never Surrender1248 No, it isn't. More and more people become self aware, more and more stories coming out about people leaving the various cults around the world.
Also, I don't believe someone who unironically says "Life of Brian" is atheist propaganda is an atheist.
Life of Brian is basically the book of mark movie adaption.
Life of Brian made it onto the Catholic Church's list of banned movies
Tyrant-Den ..whatever God...
I'm tired of slight changes, where is my modern bible reboot Visual novel
Jesus a teen drama
MAKE AN ANIME PLS, WITH FANSERVICE
Historynerd 2 Is there any lost then found text about Jesus' teenage years?
There's actual a "manga" version of the Bible that I've seen sold at some bookstores. The only downside is the characters don't seem to have the oversized anime eyes.
Yeah!! Wheres my GOT:King of Kings!
6:08
Jesus in Luke: Father, forgive them for they know not what they do.
Jesus in Mark: My love and compassion ain't the only things rated E for everyone
Jesus in mark has “love” tattooed on his right hand and “compassion” on his left hand
@@woodlefoof2 And he gave both to those who asked for it.
😂😂😂❤
"Doofenshmirtz?! What are you doing in the Bible?!" is now the funniest thing I've ever said out-loud in private lmao
Looking for Perrius Platypus, obviously.
New Testament: good ending vs bad ending vs neutral ending (featuring secret ending)
where's my true harem ending tho
@@LimeyLassen hasn't been added yet
Oh my god your right
Ah yes, the secret ending where Jesus waits 15 minutes before eating his last supper. I hope Bible 2 isn't going to re-use it for a cheap 'chievo in the story's introduction.
*JUDAS' BETRAYAL EXPLAINED?!?!* 👥 Bible: New Testament (UNUSED SCENES)
Jesus should have used reverse psychology into everyone.
"Hey leper, let everyone know I healed you"
"Hey girls, don't tell anyone about the resurrection thingy"
I love this explanation
"I am not the son of God."
"Hey everyone it's the son of God!"
He's not the Messiah, he's a very naughty boy!
N Jones
*He’s The Messiah!*
@@merrittanimation7721 He IS the Messiah!
I started researching this in 1973. Pilate never got an answer to his question, "What is truth?" The college library had some of the New Testament apocrypha, those books are now easily accessible on the web. Thanks for the fascinating look at this sacred cow of folklore and orthodoxy. Well done, you!
nice, any more anecdotes?
He never got an answer because he was looking at truth in the flesh. That’s the reason as to why Jesus didn’t verbally answer him
He was answered prior to his question and after "I am the truth" and "kingdom of god is within you". To a Roman this was incomprehensible:why would the high priests want to crucify and insist so much for a fool?
@@JA-jx1hkwhy are you answering in riddles answer in facts like the video is based
@@mr16325 it’s literally clear as day what I’m saying lol
That final message has really opened my mind and i wanted to say thank you. These videos when they came out led me down a really exciting path of self discovery. I'm really lucky to be getting to study the Hebrew and Christian Bibles in more depth at my university this semester and i got rather nostalgic for this video!!! The keeping of textual variants makes the Bible so interesting, and especially for the Hebrew Bible more beautiful in my opinion. Thanks Trey!!!
try quran. the quran unchanged even after 1400 yeas the quran have same word to word when the proclaimed prophet muhammad still alive
Absolutely agreed. it also makes you, if you believe, rely on God, more than people's bull. And in making your own mind and relationship up, rather than being dictated by bigots and right wing agenda-ists and loonies.
I just burst into laughter when he showed the archangel Doofenshmirtz. Finally somebody who supports the one true faith!
Same. I laughed as well.
You mean Herr Trumpf?🤣
Doofenshmirtz Angels Incoooorporaaaated!!!!
[musically] Doofenshmirtz reaches apotheosis!
@Kwabena Mante that’s your opinion. and theyre clearly joking lmao
I like that ending, where the girls don't tell anyone, for the same reason you stated. Like a kinda good ending, but it's still ominous and leaves room for discussing it with others and making theories
Falls in line with the Roman Catholic worldview of being the Authority who tells people what to think, though. 👍
But that may not have been the original purpose at all. The oldest Christian writings we have (from St. Paul) state that:
"For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;
And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
And that he was seen of Cephas, then of the twelve:"
(I Corinthians 15:3-5)
So to the earliest Christians it was Cephas (Peter) who became the first official witness, not the women. The ending of Mark would have made perfect sense to them. The women were the first to see the opened tomb but not the first witnesses to the resurrected Jesus. In fact, they never saw the resurrected Jesus at all. They heard a story from some dude in the tomb. That's it. It was Peter who then became the first to encounter the resurrected Jesus and bear witness to the congregation. If you were a Christian living closer to the time of Paul, then you would have been reciting the same creed Paul recited in I Corinthians. Yet all our stories of Mary Magdalene indicate that she was important to the resurrection story, which hints that early Christians may also have had a competing story that Mary was the first witness, not Peter. So the original purpose of the ending of Mark may have been to reconcile the contradiction between the stories of Mary and the early Christian creed. Mary was first to the opened tomb but Peter was still the first proper witness like the creed says. Why? Because Mary didn't tell anyone. The women are specifically needed to satisfy the "on the third day" fulfillment of the supposed messianic prophecy. It wasn't enough that Jesus came back from the dead. He had to have come back on the third day. So if Peter had borne witness to the resurrection past the expiry date, some event had to have marked the event itself. The women became a convenient time marker of the supposed resurrection.
@@andrewsuryali8540 you should make some bible history videos.
Of course it runs into the obvious issue of if they didn't tell anyone about it then how the bloody hell do we know it happened?
@@Jotari It's almost like later scribes changed the ending because this one makes it obvious that it's fiction.
im actually relieved that i already know about the bible changes you mentioned, thanks to my 8 theology classes i took in college plus my curious mind that somehow lead me to informations or videos like this. but i cannot deny the fact that i love your videos trey. thanks for taking time to explain and try to be respectful to others beliefs.
Don’t mention that to the militant atheists here. According to them, you don’t exist, considering they claim no theology course ever teaches about the obscure and dicey parts of the Bible.
I'm relieved that I was able to learn all these variances in a short Sunday morning at home on my couch instead of spending 8 years paying for the information and obtaining a signature on paper saying I should be competent and expert... the real world doesn't really care about degrees and being an auto didactic person is a more useful skill. Finding God and welcoming Jesus into our lives isn't enough but anyone can start down the path on their own in through different mediums God uses to wave a hand in front of your face. God bless and remember that you Do sin all the time and we are imperfect.. but we can repent and welcome God into your life by trying to glorify him and his grace/kindness.. watching NDE videos on YT helps.
@MW-nOttawa Wow, you start off with a really sarcastic rude comment, and end it by trying to sway people into your religion. You really are making it hard on yourself, buddy. No understanding of social tact. And you wonder why it's so hard to convince people to join your side.
@@MW-nOttawaJust because you read law books/youtube doesn’t make you competent at it as a lawyer does, same goes with engineering, medic, accounting, history, architecture, etc. What an ugly attempt to discredit someone’s achievement and qualification.
"Ain't nothing gonna break my stride, ain't nothing gonna slow me down, oh no, I've got to keep on moving."
I think it would be fascinating to read an “absolute” version of the Bible, with every removed/added stories across different sections of Christianity. Not necessarily as a denomination of its own, but more so as a compilation of what modern bibles would have been without anything omitted.
It sounds great but would also run into a tooon of debate over what counts as scripture and what just counts as stories- for instance you could make a good case for Dante's Inferno or Milton's Paradise Lost as being influential enough on modern thought about the christian afterlife to count as scripture, as much as Enoch could have. We can't prove that Enoch wasn't written originally in the same way as Inferno was, as an imagining of what the afterlife could or might be that eventually became a part of public consciousness and belief
@@amberbydreamsart5467 I don't care about the afterlife, I want to baselessly speculate about real life history through an exhaustive compilation of random holy texts lmao
The Bible: Book Of The Millennium Edition.
Not a bad idea, ONLY if you accept that it is correct for everyone to believe in a God that is different & unique for each of us. We would ALL have to agree to have the same faith in this. Making it a sin to call any person's God as a false god & not use religeon as a tool of power & subjugation over others, Something which has always been at the root of any religeon. NEVER has humanity agreed on anything so fully it was instinctual & we never will. We would have to change to be something other than human.
The Jesus Seminar tried to do something like that, but it's a very long time since I studied them (in seminary) and I don't know how far they got with that project. Try looking them up. They were, and may still be, a rather large and *very* controversial group.
4:50 And thus Yeshua spoketh "BRVHH"
On the last change I just find the process of canonization to be very interesting. My professor told us that essentially books were canonized in or out based on if they fit the belief systems at the time, or if they were considered relevant by people in power. This brings up interesting questions though about if some of those books would have been canonized in more modern times if we had the chance
It was simpler than that. They went to war over it, and what you read today is what the survivors of those wars wrote. Simple as that.
@@korosuke1788there hasnt been that many religious conflicts of early christians.
the bible we have today is still that of constantinople and the religious wars really only started after that time.
not having a canon actually lead to less wars because no one could truly say that stuff was heretical because the canon wasnt made.
In which case, in the long term they shot themselves in the foot as the prophets and revelation completely blast power freaks to f*ck.
I watch both parts today. I am writing here because I want to thank you for making both.
Great video! I agree that “#1: Books Removed” could have been more nuanced, but you definitely get the gist correct! There were tons of other books floating around that Jews and Christians considered authoritative but later fell out of favor (e.g. Tobit and Enoch in particular). The Qumran sectarians apparently valued the Book of Enoch for example since a few copies were found among the Dead Sea Scrolls. As for Christians, the Shepherd of Hermas is a better example than the Nag Hammadi books in my opinion. The Shepherd of Hermas was super popular and even appears alongside other New Testament compilations. Even the Codex Sinaiticus contains a copy of the Shepherd of Hermas!
Hi @ReligionForBreakfast Great videos :)
You make great vids man, learnt a lot from your channel!
The
Chapter 19-MARY (Surah Maryam)
quran.com/19
I was wondering what you would think about this video. Thank you for commenting.
And the lord said 'bruh', and saw that it was good.
I laughed. Not gonna lie
Genesis 4:20
😂
The bible has had more updates than my iphone.
More updates than technology itself 😬
Honestly I'd love to just see Biblical stories retold with your animation, your depiction of the opening of the tomb feat. Doofenshmirtz had me dying
I love this dudes subtle memes, i can tell you have a great sense of humor
I wonder if anyone else noticed the Gnostic Monk's pose
Even the thumbnail is a masterclass in hidden memery
There are 2 JoJo ref@@Tainuo
I kinda like angry Jesus. Like a father figure that disciplines His children.
Chad Jesus
As a Christian I think it makes more sense tbh, we’re taught Jesus is both 100% man and god so it makes sense he would have more human emotions
Christopher Govan very well said. When I recall the name Emanuel “God is with us” i think of God that mourns and laughs with us with emotions.
Infancy Gospel of Matthew depicts Jesus the child like Carrie the movie.
Kills children, withers hands, "step" dad Joseph laments that anyone who pisses is kid off (Jesus) end up dying.
www.vice.com/en_us/article/nzn5zd/baby-jesus-was-kind-of-a-dick
poor soul that you are. go receive enough anger of your worldly daddy.
Ya got me! I haven't been adding subscriptions lately because I doubt I will ever have time to watch all the subscriptions I have added since THE BEGINNING. ..but with your parting words reminding your followers that the Bible remains a respectable book while seeing it in reality, a changing text subtlly comforting. I find the omnipotence provoking that thiese important books continue to unfold, revealing itself as prophesized; and timing of course is everything.
Your purity impressed me and summarizes nicely what I have been feeling while on my own spiritual journey .I have met a brother who is just ahead on the same trail. It is satisfying to know of your many interests rather than trying to pass yourself off as some higher sort of being because you have explored and understood these books. Perhaps you struggle with bringing it into focus as I do.. I often feel filled with awe and delight knowing I am eternal being....and then I come across some possibilities and find them truthful in my heart but not quite fitting in with my yet unsolidified enlightenment. I only know that my desire to fulfill my seeking soul is the greates partI of who I am , and my belief grows stronger that for our Human race to continue, we are to love one another.
9:46 If you listen rreeeaally carefully you can hear Jesus leaving Trey's bedroom to ascend back to heaven.
This is one of the most interesting and potentially influental areas of research. Truly fascinating.
If you are interested in gnostic or other gospels omitted from the bible I recommend starting with the book of Jasher. Super interesting, and imo I don't know why it was omitted. The book of adam and eve is perhaps more obvious lol... Still don't know why song of Solomon is in the KJV hahs
Interest will only drive down the influence by what's being revealed as it should be.
Eh
read Bart Ehrmans books.. that’s where much of this comes from.. this comes from “Who Changed The Bible and Why”
Chapter 19-MARY (Surah Maryam)
quran.com/19
Now THIS is how to spend a Sunday :-)
Haha, funny coincidence
Sunday gang
The sabbath day is Saturday the catholic’s Change it they are the Antichrist they have ruled for 1260 years
Akmac ooooh. Spooky. Probably had to take a break lying to the parents of the kids they were diddling to pull that off.
Haven Thompson I’m not joking watch Antichrist on hope through prophecy it perfectly Aligns with the bible
Your two part video series are awesome! You did a fantastic job of explaining in the simplest of terms the complicated history of the Bible and especially the "New Testament." I have done a lot of research myself and agree with most of what you state in your videos. People need to do this kind of research when they attend any "Bible study" at any church they attend. I attempted to teach this to people at a church I used to belong to and it resulted in my attendance dropping from about 12 people down to 0 after a few weeks. People just don't want to accept these facts and will argue with anger in their voices if you try to teach it to them. It was such a disappointing experience, I quit that church and although I still believe in Jesus very much, I don't attend any church any more because the priests and pastors and even nuns in the Catholic Church are all lying to those who attend classes they teach! It's so sad!
Good work. I lije your attitude as a student, a seeker of the truth. Good stuff.😊
As a Greek, I had a fanboy moment when I saw the fanart mosaic in the beginning with "Τρει ο Εξηγητής" - literally "Trey the Explainer", even though greek around the period such artwork was made was not only very different, but typically stylized
Same. It was cool to see.
I’m Socrates
@@marlkarx3725 Hi Socrates!
@@marlkarx3725 Hi Socrates!
wow i didn't see this comment untl a year later lol
I am the one who made that
I made that piece in like literally 4 hours until like 5am because i could not sleep which is why i just google translated 'the explainer' and transliterated trey
if i could've tried to replicate more proper greek i might've but yknow it is how it is
glad you really liked it
I thought wine/vineger was Posca, which was made by wine turned to vinegar. It was a common military drink of the legions. So in that viewpoint, the legionnaires could have a supply. So the soldiers wanted Jesus to suffer longer, or thought thirst was a worse way to go than crucifixion.
This I believe was a mistake due to the Greek authors not knowing anything about Roman military drinks.
Vinegar also literally means "sour wine" (vin aigre)
Thanks for the input. I like finding missed links in history too. It is so fascinating when a detail of research can be the answer to a big question.
Hmm, I had assumed they were insulting him because, in Ancient Rome, a sponge soaked in vinegar is what you use to wipe your ass
I cannot imagine that soldiers made a habit of drinking sour wine? Marching and fighting do not make good bedfellows with diahrea!!
It wasn't to extend the torture.
It was part of the mocking the soldiers did. The Roman soldiers mocked Jesus by sarcastically calling him a King. The crown of thorns, the tunic, etc was part of the sarcasm.
Anyway, a sponge on a stick was a roman butt cleaning device.😅 (It was cleaned with sea water...not vinegar).
Sponges weren't always used, cloth, cotton ball thingies, etc were available to most...and we're shared, publicly. Only wealthy people carried their own personal "sea sponge on a stick" butt cleaning device. E.g. A Roman soldier would think any king carries his own personal genuine sea sponge on a stick. And not a cloth stick, or something else.
Second, the lower classes drank a drink called Posca. Vinegar mixed with water and sometimes, some flavouring (mostly herbs). The lower class Greeks adopted this strange drink but didn't have a word for it, so they just called it vinegar in Greek.
The Upper classes hated this drink...and took offence it being offered to them as it's a symbol of being of low class. E.g., offering Posca to a noble, emperor, wealthy person, or a king would be a big insult.
In Rome, at first, only well-off individuals could become soldiers...the type of people who would never drink posca. After Marius' military reforms, mostly the lower classes became soldiers (not counting officers). Eventually, soldiers were given Posca as part of their ration...daily.
If a Roman soldier gave you a drink a Greek calls vinegar, in Greek, it's definitely Posca.
The Roman soldiers were mocking Jesus with the epithet that read "King of the Jews" (continuing the King themed mocking). Offering Posca with a Sponge on a Stick, to a King, would be a massive insult/degrading...in a very sarcastic fashion.
As a Christian, all I can say is bravo. This was so well done. And to be honest, this has strengthened my faith. This makes the Bible feel so much more real to me. Thank you for this.
i feel it only makes it more real on a story or literature level.
So seeing discrepancies in the "infallible" word of God and claiming the Bible is the word of God while the scripture has been corrupted strengthens your faith?
@@irfannasim2722 your last name reminds me of Nazeem from Skyrim.
@@irfannasim2722 Who said the word isn't infallible? Men messed it up, not God. c:
I totally agree! Even before seeing this video, I've been getting into learning about the history of the books of the Bible, and in my opinion it really helps with trying to interpret it.
I had a good giggle when Doof came onto the screen. Too funny! What a great video- well organized and presented
And the lord said upon the non believer
*"Hell is sponsored Raid shadow legends. So think twice before you start talking shit"*
Did you know raid is getting an anime
@@lolface_9363 Is it true XD
@@lolface_9363 say sike now
@@lolface_9363 ua-cam.com/video/Bmc9NFfhx74/v-deo.html
How do you know what your lord said? Did you read it in the grand book of make believe?
If you do return to the Bible could you cover gnosticism in more depth
Screw that! I want a Heavy Metal rendition of The Book of Giants! Flesh-Eating antedeluvian behemots > some dudes who thought they had secret passwords to get into heaven.
There's a good ReligionForBreakfast video on it if you're interested if he doesn't do it ua-cam.com/video/Iuvk2bLCzwM/v-deo.html
69 like, nice
In the meantime, flat earth paradise has a video called "sophia, the black sun, gnosticism..."
The video title is longer so I shortened it. Star seeds tend to be drawn to gnosticism, and videos like Trey's. There are videos about Star Seeds too.
Gnosticism is a comfort to those who wish The Bible is something it simply isn’t. Be careful of it
My ancestor, James Ussher, was the top theologian in Ireland in the early 1600s. He worked with King James promoting the Anglican Church and persecuting Catholics, influencing the King James Bible translation.
Thank you for making these videos informative and not bashing the faith. My Faith is so important to me and I love to learn new things. I love your channel, keep up the good work!
As an atheist, I very much enjoy your videos. The early days of Christianity are utterly fascinating to me, especially given how different various texts of the Bible are to their modern-day counterparts.
As an Atheist, l too enjoy these kinds of videos.
Ad an atheist idk why you have to mention that
As a vegan atheist who also does cross-fit and recently got vaccinated i agree.
@@zorubark because most non religious people wouldn’t be here...
@@edwinzuniga1987 what
" The Hips don't Lie"
- Trey the Explainer, 2020
It's Shakira
LoL!!!
daym! my woman isn't on either list!
cue the music...
"I like big butts! and I cannot lie!"
My woman is off that chart! (and I cannot lie!)
@@vaidehimohan9400 "hips don't lie"
-Shakira
-- Trey the Explainer
--- Vaidehi
@@shelbyb9965
"hips don't lie"
~Shakira
~~Trey the Explainer
~~~Vaidehi Mohan
~~~~Shelby B
Fun Fact: In one of the early printings of the King James Bible the line "I do not condemn you; go and sin no more" was misprinted as "I do not condemn you; go and sin on more"
My new favorite channel, Dude. From all the information to your cute little ditties at the end. *chefs kiss*. 😊 Thank you for your hard work.
*Jesus looks at then in anger*
Final boss music starts playing.
Isn't Jesus the final boss of reality, as he destroys it at the end of time create a heaven on Earth?
@@ZephLodwick No that's Shiva.
What game?
@@ousamadearu5960 The game of salvation
Thank you for this video (Parts 1 & 2)
15:00 In England we say "Red sky at night shepherd's delight, red sky in the morning shepherd's warning." dont know if anyone else has the same expression.
15:40 Something kind of similar happened in the Harry Potter books, though in this case its more of an omission than a mistake. In the first three books J.K. Rowling referred to Severus Snape as a fairly short man. But after the 6'1" Alan Rickman was cast in the role for the film adaptions she basically avoided talking about Snape's height for the remainder of the book series.
Hmm I never noticed this but it makes sense
That still wouldn't explain Rickman being like twenty years too old for the role. Still perfect in it though.
@@Jotari Rapid aging brought on by stress.
@Bruce strkland
No. Human nature is not to lie, or leave things out, or just contradict themselves. That is the devil's work. Lucifer is responsible for these things. Or Lucifer's other names: Yaldebaoth, or the demi urge. He has so many other names he goes by. But you will find information more easily using one of those three names. That bastard.
I think you're supposed to separate the syllables.... aall len RIKmannnn rip
The Mark sudden ending is like Dostojevski's book ending. Leaves the door open.
Or the rock open........get it? :D
@venus as a boy kinda does because most people think mark was written first
It's interesting how Mark says that the three women didn't convey what they saw to anyone, yet Mark knows about it
Well this has definitely given me a lot of reading material for my research, thanks, this is very helpful!
That vinegar drink on the cross was actually a standard drink of Roman soldiers. It wasn't given to him maliciously or mockingly, but out of compassion, since the soldier giving to him was just giving Jesus what he himself drank.
sststr.......water in those days was contaminated and made people sick or even die. That is why people drank vinegar and wine
The NKJV says "sour wine".
When wine spoils, it becomes vinegar.
Water containers outside from tanned leather is expensive for soldiers. Soldiers usually have ale and vinegar mix in their rations so that even if they lose their water supply.
Definitely interesting. When I was studying the bible, I didn't understand this passage. I was like ??? are they being assholes?? He's thirsty!
@@pennychurchward1481 I wonder where exactly this comes from. I've heard it for years, but never a really good explanation for exactly how "all water" was undrinkable. Creeks? Rivers? Lakes? Rain?
Being a Christian myself I’ve always thought it was important to not always literally interpret the Bible, I also believe that understanding the context and history behind many of the themes in the Bible is important. GREAT VIDEO!
Religion is a spook.
im4everskilled tip your fedora more. Repent and turn to Christ
@@tariqskanaal8187
I'll turn to Christ and tip my fedora harder.
@@im4everskilled I love when certain atheists say that they are open minded and enlightened only to immediately mock someone they disagree with and insult their beliefs with no reason too. Even if the person they are insulting is being appreciative. Golden hypocrite.
@@monarchblue4280 But did he ever say he was open minded? No? Then stop putting words in his mouth.
I really enjoyed this series. I was familiar with some of the changes that you mentioned after reading the book, Misquoting Jesus but some I am glad I learned about some.
Okay now you got me googlin. I’m here to wait on part 3.
Stuff like this fascinates me. History of the Bible and the wars that were fought over its meaning is really interesting.
It's fascinating and also kind of sad. People fighting to death over these stories, torturing each other, ostricizing each other. I don't think that's what Jesus wanted to happen.
Without adding the other ending to the Gospel of Mark does make you consider how the writer knew about the women in the tomb if they didn't say anything about it.
plot twist. Mark is a woman.
@@2tehnik Given since last video said we don't actually know who wrote the Gospel of Mark, it very well may have been written by a woman.
It all seems like a flimsy explanation from "Mark": "well, the reason you haven't heard from Jesus ever since his crucifixion is because no one told you! But he is risen, I promise you. See, there are three women witnesses, and a random dude had told them that Jesus rose, but they were so afraid they didn't tell anyone else."
If God wanted to show the people that his messiah was risen, why not tell anyone? Why send some dude, without explanation of who he is (Mark sure is lazy here), and have him tell two random women? Surely, this guy or even God could go to the disciples. But a better question: if Jesus rose, why didn't he go to them personally? Or at least wait for the women? Surely, if something miraculous happened like rising from the grave, you'd tell it at least to the disciples who believe you are the messiah?
@@spinakker14 Jesus does wait for different people in the other gospels. And Mark's long ending.
And as far as the "no ending" ending of Mark goes I think that'd be missing the point that Trey pointed out (Mark thematically being about people not listening to God).
@@merrittanimation7721 it makes sense too that a woman would take a mans name for her pen name since most did anyways cause psychologically speaking, most will pick a male author over a female's, and in a time where women were to be seen, not heard, you wouldnt want to hear what a woman has to say as much as a man who is seen as the dominant.
You genuinely have my favorite intro on youtube
Love this channel started watching can't stop
I'd love for you to do a big vid on Gnosticism at some point, their history and mythology is fucking fascinating
I always found it odd that people think Judas was bad when he was simply fulfilling gods prophecy. He was Jesus most passionate and loyal follower, I find it incredibly likely that he did it because Jesus asked him too full well known his name would be defamed for eternity.
@@mooninc.185 "And as they were eating, he said, “Truly, I say to you, one of you will *betray* me.”"
- Matt. 26:21
"Then when Judas, his betrayer, saw that Jesus was condemned, he changed his mind and brought back the thirty pieces of silver to the chief priests and the elders, saying, *“I have sinned by betraying innocent blood.”* They said, “What is that to us? See to it yourself.” And throwing down the pieces of silver into the temple, he departed, and he went and hanged himself."
- Matt. 27:3-5
And in any case, the whole Gnostic story doesn't make any sense. Why would he need Judas to betray him? Why would he keep that secret to his apostles?
I'm with Griff!
The Gnostic stuff is Lovecraftian!
The apocryphon of John trips me out. So wild. It claims "Jesus" was the serpent in the garden.. idk how I feel about it but it is fascinating to say the least.
Jerid!
Idk but the ambiguous ending kinda seems more fitting
It makes a call to faith and leaves things to everyone's Interpretation and own believes
"leaves things to everyone's Interpretation" that's probably why they changed it.
darth geekboy, that’s the kind of comment someone makes when they don’t agree with the faith and want to ardently prove it wrong because they either hate it or have some kind of bad history with it or maybe just don’t want to follow it and hate that other people follow it because of the group-think it inspires that then puts pressure on you to act a certain way.
I sincerely hope you would find faith and a good place to practice your faith where people would not abuse your trust and where you could truly experience how God can change a person and move them to love just like the gospels and the letters all have proclaimed.
I’m a Protestant Christian and Like the original ending to Mark.
@@matthewzbornak6880 Christ Jesus is not found in your reply. Have you entered into the Kingdom of Heaven that you may weigh the hearts of others? Have you gone between realms to make the souls of others whole?
@@matthewzbornak6880 poor soul
Great video , very informative! Keep it up 👍
Thank you so much for this effort. This was incredibly interesting.
Trey, you're one of the only channels that I watch every single upload. They're always interesting, thought provoking and wholly unique from other youtube channels. Thank you and keep up the great work!
The Gospel of Judas makes more sense imo, I've always found it weird that Christians in my life hated Judas so much when technically his actions were pretty instrumental to the entire arc of Jesus. Jesus telling him to do seems more logical imo
Specially since Judas was the smartest, or most knowledgeable amongst the disiples. Such a sad fate that he is now known as the betrayer, while in reality he was the sacrifice. Or part of the sacrifice.
The sum of money he betrayed Jesus for was also paltry. My personal interpretation is that Judas also mistook Jesus's purpose and saw him as a revolutionary figure that would overthrow the corrupt church and Rome, so he was intentionally trying to provoke a conflict with the authorities.
@@HueghMungus Nope. The smartest disciple was Mary Magdalene, and the one who really understood Jesus' teachings. Judas was the betrayer, because has become very doubtful on Jesus words. If he wasn't a real traitor he wouldn't hanged up himself by remorse.
It is a real story. Now whether it's a real event is up for debate, but it really is a story that exists.
@@AlbertoJorgeSoares well that gospel seems to contradict that.
This was a sensational video. I don't subscribe to any faith, but this series gave me a huge amount of insight, I formed new positive and negative opinions about the Bible. Everyone who is faithful needs to watch this video, because I feel like too many are blissfully ignorant. I feel closer to knowing the truth. Even those who scoff at the faithful should watch this. There are things we can take from the bible and use in our lives.
Love this! Other changes were names of people and places, locations, and descriptions.
This is my kinda Sunday sermon!
Soooo Judas was the Severus Snape to Jesus' Dumbledore??
i screamed this as soon as i heard that part of the video💀
A lot of Hollywood and film culture is inspired from the Bible.
Shakespeare stole a lot of ideas from the Bible for his plays. When Cesar dies, he writes into the play the occurrences during Jesus's death.
Wouldnt that be awesome if when Judas hung himself, he wakes up in hell to a crucified Jesus (who also just got to Hell) saying," Hello dear friend, put your Armor of God on, we have work to do."
No, Judas was the Hebrew version of the Eqyptian Set to Jesus' Osiris
The One on the Cross wasn't Jesus, but not Judas either. It was another disciple which God made him seem to be Jesus. And the Angel sitting on the Tomb, Lmao that's most probably Satan
I've learned so much. Thabk you for this video!
Respect for this! Very well put together
It would be interesting to compare the "mentality" of modern Christians vs early Christians.
It seems that Goliath the Giant wasn't a "giant" at all, but just an abnormally tall man; the angel in Christ's tomb might have just been an old man. Women had a bigger role before some editing... I'm starting to think that the people who lived closer to Jesus's time than today took the stories a lot less literally, rather taking the lesson than the literal details, which btw seem to be blown out of proportion at this point. The original seems a lot more realistic/plausible... and a lot more morally conflicting. More human than the whitewashed stuff you get today (haha get it? Cause white Jesus? nvm).
I view the Bible as a source of life lessons. A kind of a philosophy/history book. It's a way to teach wisdom, but for me taking the Bible literally is quite naive. Studying the different creatures and symbols in the Bible, their origin and meaning, and impact on our modern perception of the world, because of them is way more valuable, than just merely believing.
The giant is your fight against the flesh
@@bagatur8810 to read the bible is one thing but to taste it is to know god
@@matthewbarton2242 eat the bible
@@aperson1510 Its got a licorice like taste to it.
Great video as usual, Trey! I actually wrote a paper for my New Testament Greek class two years ago in which I argued that Mark did not end at verse eight of chapter 16 but that the original ending was simply lost. My reasoning for this was mainly that it would be incredibly strange for a book to end with the word γάρ. Γάρ is a postpositive conjunction used to connect two independent clauses; due to the syntactic constraints that govern its use, it almost never appears at the end of a sentence in the corpus of Greek literature and literally never at the end of an entire work. Because of this, I suspect that part of the original manuscript was lost and that the words εφοβουντο γαρ are really just a fragment of a longer sentence.
So what about the "according to Mark" at the end?
Couldn't that use of syntax be seen as a literary device. One that is used to add to the message of an ambiguous or unfinished ending (in the version that ends in verse 8).
The fact yap is never used at the end of a sentence could be a clue as to authenticity of the story being written?
What also was not mentioned in the video, or here, was the curious gap left between the ending of Mark and the beginning of Luke in Vaticanus that was not used for other books in the Codex.
This lends to the longer ending being known to the scribe, and perhaps in his possession at his time. Due to unknown reasons, the shorter option won out.
Further more, there is patristic evidence for the longer ending of Mark. Also of note, the portion of Luke that notes Christ "being in agony" also finds patristic evidence.
The maker of the video failed to note that Luke has been archaeologically proven to have been alive in the first century, particularly during the time of Paul's journeys. He also claims to have been a companion of Paul's and also claims to have interviewed the witnesses themselves concerning Jesus and also "set the things in order."
The gospels are accurate renderings of history. They are corroborated by 1 Corinthians 15, which is generally accepted by scholars as an original work of Paul's.
Thanks bro great work ...love you bro.....
The Infographs are very very helpful!
Since the Bible has been changed, edited, re-written, modified, abridged, etc then it is no longer the Inspired Word of God. It is man's rendition of what man thinks God meant.
This
Senor Cabeza de Grande ..... always has been....
Your comment have more wisdom than the bible.
@@M.Ghilas Sorry, can you tell me whats the name of the letter in which your name is written.
HAHA every proud knee shall bow!! Keep that in your ear goat.
Trey; the fact checking Theropod messiah of early Creteceous age!
The theropod messiah is what I'm calling him from now on.
@@ender7278 perfection! 👍
Ten points to Griffindor!
I really enjoyed Part 1. If you've not seen it, go and take a look.
Such a great video. I dont like history in general but somehow you made it interesting for me. Keep it going.
As a young Christian person this was super helpful to me thank you for this work :)
Chapter 19-MARY (Surah Maryam)
quran.com/19
Psalm 84 :11 For the Lord God is a sun 🌞
John 8 :12 I am the Light of the world🌞
Malachi 4:2 Sun of righteousness 🌞
That's why they put a picture of the Sun on some the Bibles instead of a drawing of Jesus.
The Old Testmement was written in Hebrew, Hebrew word for Sun is Shemash, Shemash was the Sun-God of the Sumerians and the Babylonians in 2,100 BC.
That's why Christians worship on a SUNday🌞, they worship a ancient Sun-God and don't even know it🤣
@@abdurrehman348 that's actually extremely interesting thank you
@@Epck You're welcome :)
quran.com/5
You may want to check out this chapter as well, the end is actually a conversation that will take place on the day of judgement between God and Jesus(peace be upon him). This link will direct you to the conversation part (recitation and translation) ua-cam.com/video/8bnrhQn7dlk/v-deo.html
Carer Forever Are you able to link your sources? I’m interested in this.
0:10
I am interested in this religion
Trey, the god rested in the first realm of Dinosauria and the overseer of all evolutionary derivatives :)
My professional opinion?
*_*all the velociraptors sitting in the room stare at me ready to maul me to death_**
Uh... 10/10.
We meet on Tuesdays, no hotdog buns
@@gamma_ray20xx53 it boils down to Adam and Eve spoke to our creators ,I personally believe it was more than one but regardless of the fact . what was the language they spoke to our creator(s) in?
here's where it gets really interesting no matter which concept of a higher power you choose to go with, it says that a higher power gave you a language they wanted to talk you in. to not only talk to them and everybody else, because it's the perfect language . now for some reason or another as the story goes. you know that all-knowing All-Seeing. all smarter than you in so many ways . higher power, kind of power. did something WRONG according to what a man said. *a man came up with a story that said* . now the same creators think it's time to forget that language and go with a whole bunch of new ones ..in fact the new ones, we're willing to record n let you even remember as far as history is concerned . the Vatican does have more space than Disneyland, underground and its all full of books somebody's keeping track and nobody's telling you anything that's what I mean by Sponged, if you sponge out the beginning and a whole lot of The Middle . the end of it can be anything you want and somebody actually managed to make that statement true.
according to any thick Book of Dogma, in the beginning you're going to find something that says. *in the beginning, he created the heavens and the Earth* ( let's get this straight, is the heavens n Earth already completed? because this is day one, if it's already done...) and then usually if you keep reading that same book, you're going to find , that the moon came way after the fact .you could say the moon came , many moons later. according to what I keep telling people , *in the beginning he made a Pizza Planet put a dome on top and renovated the basement* ; if you truly think about it that's all that was created up to that point ,hence in the beginning he created the heavens and the Earth; there is no moon , there is no reason to go up.
most books will stay away from the word Creator or even creators . they will substitute a whole bunch of other words, which in the average person's mind makes them think of creators while they are saying something completely different
if you do a little bit of research, in the 50s and 60s the US military has project Fishbowl and project Dominic which in short boiled down to, firing missiles of the spooky nookie kind, at the firmament and if that didn't do anything .then I don't think our creators really gave a damn about some guy building a tower to try and touch the firmament and that's how I came up with the fact that the Tower of Babel story is a very pretty story but not very true
oh Lord, thundering Jesus ,king of kings ,savior O saviors, The Holiest of Holy Spirit, the truth, the life, the light, the way , you know what I'm wondering as you read all that stuff ? which one of those words actually says, *my Creators* ? whole bunch of words not to my creators? , just who the hell are you talking about ?? let me tell you .about a book that has been *Rewritten. Revised ,Remastered, Re translated* and after it's gone through all that, it was given to the Kings for them to take their favourite parts out and then one more Revision by the Pope (Protector Of Pedophiles Everywhere) just to nail it down so to speak. is that the thick book you're going to quote from? it's been *Re* this and *Re* that, so bad that, someone once said it's the oldest game of telephone going? nobody wants to know that satanists originally changed their Satanic Bible A-round to appease the sheeple ;change the few names A-round, they kept the word bible though . it's a shame that the person reading this doesn't know that; if you come at a holy book, with a with some ink or an eraser there's no magical glow that's going to overtake the book and destroy the pen in your hand or crumble the Eraser into a million pieces. if this is your impression of what happens when you come at a holy book with the intent of changing a few words around I, feel, really, sorry, for you . the truth is nothing happens and the words just get changed around but afterwards they will happily tell you. there was a light and it stopped us from ruining the word of A God ; not your creators. just a puny God ; Hallelujah :means ur life belongs to Alla (Satan``s Top 5 names)
*I am the light* let's see; how well you know your Christian Bible. if I was to ask you ,who is the bearer of light? what would your answer be? *I am the truth* what did the serpent tell Eve just before she bit into the forbidden fruit ? something like, all I offer you is, the , something, something, itsssss, on the tip of my tongue and *I am the way* because that's been hidden in your book and that's the satanists taking one little jab; in the left direction? .the way is hidden from the sheeple? so . I am the truth, the life, the light the way .who the hell is that guy anyways and why do the satanists want you to go up to hell ??and not tell you the truth of where Heaven is ? I guess that's why they had to invent that pretty ball that you think you live on
the most important msg they want put out there is when u die they want u to tell folks to go up, straight to hell. if hollywood is run by satanists n they keep tellin u god lives upstairs; that's true. BUT ..if I like big buts and I cannot lie ,then baby this one is the biggest buts of them all...ur creators that made the 7th angel of LITE ,who didnt like it in heaven n left,, called himself *the 1 true god* ,of hell ,BUT your creators , live down stairs. Sumerian one of the 1st ones in our WRITTEN existence BAFF is on the top 5 of 1st names given to satan (who composes this song). Hallelujah :means ur life belongs to Alla ( Satans Top 5 names); thers no remix,no remakes; thers 1 other version only kids can sing; n u can only wear black or wite,red or purple .kids can wear yellow. im sure u heard it n now watch in a new light ua-cam.com/video/fwMowPviUAQ/v-deo.html all u saw was either satanic or satanic over tones n a flat earth for secrets in plain site....oh yeah *its flat as fuk, peace n love* .
in the beginning there were very limited amount of words and each word had a specific meaning ,if you say hallelujah, slow enough you will hear the word Alla but don't trust your human hearing trust some guy who's going to tell you it has to be about Jesus Christ, after all . did the Muslims have a remote chance of having something correct here ?even though in the end, all three religions will state they believe in the same God, not your creators ,just a puny God
there's a few folks in the flat-earth community that decided to take a look at what is on the other side of the firmament and the general consensus , it's not a liquid. I keep telling people Heaven Is Down and now some other stuff about God and Truth according to the way I see those words. I hope I'm not talking to someone whose head is as thick as the book they believe in
the code that I'm working on right now, what do these words mean? ua-cam.com/video/_UR42poPhxY/v-deo.html
except you have to consider that it's being hidden by the same people that sponged, all of our languages and only put forward the ones they wanted to present to the rest of society . if you start digging, anything past Sumerian,, it's a brick wall . unless of course you have access to the Vatican Library which I don't ,so I can only go on the facts that they're trying to present secrets in plain sight; a good example would be ``. Mother Mary comes to me, speaking words of wisdom, let it be. `` Tammuz or Ramses , was the first person to Proclaim himself Satan in human form and his mother's name was Mary. (the extra short version is) after Mother Mary took her kids life and all his Fame. that story can be found in the Satanic Bible .now most Christians will scream that you should not look at the Satanic Bible and that's only because they don't want you to see, the two books are virtually identical except the names have been changed, to protect the guilty but as long as you don't look and by the way looking does not mean accepting. because I really don't want to hear ,how you think I'm pushing the satanic agenda
they started with hiding the fact that *you can cure you of anything that's wrong with you* to invent modern medicine; which cured cancer around 1945 but if they told mainstream that ; it's completely cured. how .FrEaKing HOW would they continue to siphon 120 million dollars a day for cancer research, plus another 50 million from NASA Who currently tripled its funding with the Artemis Space Program; you're going to find various other means and methods , they manage to put forward to plunder and pillage approximately *five hundred million dollars every single day just out of North America alone* and then there's the Russians and the EU on the other side. to fund various programs like the one I got stuck in?
PS I get as a very popular response to this post a person will start out saying this is all completely wrong but they never ever say what or why it's wrong?
i got the information necessary to stop this mess ,if you had tools stopping this without breaking any laws n its all legally and peacefully . which is a lot better than the options that they're asking you to pick, believe me you're going down a path they're jerry-rigging for you;; if you want to find out a little more about that I can explain ,just be ready to get some answers that have nothing to do with mainstream
ALSO
I have a way of stopping this without any violence but I need a little bit of help because they're really screwing with my computer but first let's get you thinking in the right direction.
Would love to see a deep dive into Gnosticism, you are so good at conveying the balance of things...
Extremely Well Done! Thanks
It's my understanding as well, that there was a practice of "divination" used by the clergy and high officials when the choice needed to be made as to which books were to be included in the canon.
The candidate books were spread out on a table in the evening and the plan was that in the morning, those books to be selected would be on the table and all others would be on the floor.
Of course, no one was to enter the room in the night.
Of course...
The Word of God is divinely protected by Him and is the Truth. God is ALMIGHTY. The idea that the Bible has been altered from the Truth is a lie from Satan, to keep us from reading it. DON'T BELIEVE THE LIE, READ THE BIBLE AND ACCEPT JESUS CHRIST AS YOUR SAVIOR BEFORE YOU DIE AND IT'S TOO LATE FOR YOU. SALVATION and ETERNAL LIFE can not be earned it is THE GIFT FROM GOD TO ALL WHO BELIEVE THAT JESUS CHRIST IS THEIR SAVIOR. PERIOD.
slamee100 Having blind faith is a nice and comforting thought, but even Jesus taught to have a healthy amount of skepticism about everything. And to never just blindly believe.
This is actually a very old myth.
Do you have sources for this?
Is that a joke? Because it is funny
this was a good series (although only 2 episodes long). Such information is extremely important for understanding modern religions objectively, but is rarely talked about.
Something that intrigued me was the number of Christian sects shown at the end of video. I only knew about the Protestant sects, Roman Catholics and Eastern Orthodoxy (Albanian, Greek and Oriental).
If you would be interested, please make a video/series explaining the history of sects and when and why they separated from other Christian beliefs.
Wow, I love this, thanks much my friend
Love your topic, tact, and information. Just wish I didn't have to watch 100 videos to find good ones like this. Thx
I've always found the stories in the Bible incredibly interesting, even if my actual belief in them has been minor. If one views them as mythology, then they are just as interesting as the Norse and Greek. I remember this awesome animated series from when I was a kid, where each episode was a story from the Bible, animated in a different style. Wonderful stuff, and something anyone who appreciates a good story should check out, wether they are religious or not. 🙂
@ I'm not quite sure what you mean with "knowledgeable men", but I agree that the gospels are different and comparing them to myths are a stretch. I do think they are mythologized versions of real events , so the comparison isn't too far-fetched, but they do have a quite different function. (Some of the texts in the New Testament are straight up political, and have a very clear real-world purpose.) Still, as an agnostic, I do find both the myths of old and the texts in the Bible to have a similar function: Worldviews and ideas that in some regards are outdated, but still has something to teach us.
@Ninja Crackpot I don't quite get what you are saying, but I guess you argue that the New Testament is based on real events? I agree with you on that, and my statement wasn't meant to argue that they are the same thing, but that they have a similar function to a non-believer like myself: old stories that shouldn't be taken at face value, but that still have wisdom in them that we could consider today.
The funny thing is that Snorre, who wrote down most of the Norse myths we know today, was a Christian and tried to justify the myths as real historical stories, but that the gods weren't real gods, only mighty kings and heroes claiming to be God. He even snuck in references to "the true God", mightier than Odin.
A friend of mine wrote a master's theises on how the story of Odin hanging himself in Yggdrasil to gain knowledge might have been influences by Christian stories of Jesus' crucifixion that the Vikings heard on their travels. He didn't really fully believe this himself, as the thesis was mostly a critique of the "one old God" theory that is popular, where scholars think Odin and Wodan and other northern-european gods are just different versions of a singular original deity. My friend wanted to show how such singular views with arguable evidence could limit our openness to different possibilities.
@ you do realize you completely contradicted yourself, right?
@@Rhaenarys how so? The torah is written by lawmakers and sages, the Gospels were written by basically illiterate witnesses, they are AND feel different. The definition of myth lines up only with some stuff of the old testament, not with "lmao the omniscent guy got betrayed, he never saw it coming" in the new testament. That would make for a shitty myth tbh
You are referring to Veggie Tales
I loved this... You've sent me researching and man do I love to read. I look forward to more Bible history, it's one of my favourite books. And thank you for not having those weird music influencing peoples' feeling.
Chapter 19- MARY
quran.com/19
@@abdurrehman348 no
No matter what do you believe, the Bible study is always still fascinating.
this is so interesting, especially as a person who grew up Catholic. I just love archeological and scholarly discussions of religions around the world :)
Trey, if you want to know about the vinegar and wine thing, look at this.
*Posca*
*-*
*Posca was an Ancient Roman drink, made by mixing vinegar, water, and perhaps herbs. It was the soldiers, the lower classes and the slaves who drank posca, a drink despised by the upper class.*
This was the principal drink of virtually all Roman soldiers, their 'Gatorade' of sorts. It's what would have most likely been at hand during Jesus' crucifixion. What conclusion is one left to draw?
intresting
@Stefan Urban wasnt the soldier gave the wine on sponge? I believe he used the same sponge the roman used to clean latrines
@Stefan Urban Nope- the Romans were pretty lazy abou the crucifixions, they were actually only a couple of inches off the ground. They weren't concerned with making a lot of effort as they crucified many people. Whip them, tie them for the most part (nails were not typical), then put the cross bar on a stake in the ground, with their feet about 6" off the ground. Leave them to die.
I have heard that the drink that was offered to him while on the cross had a narcotic in it to ease his pain and to make him look as though he had died. He later recovered from the narcotic while in tomb and was able to get out of it.
@@mharclerode However, with Jesus and the other two, this was special. The other two were not thieves but insurgents and since Jesus was seen as a major trouble maker, this crucifixion was meant to show others what would happen to them if they didn't shut up and tow the line. There are drawings of a man with the head of a donkey on a cross, this was meant to represent Jesus. Crucifixions were extremely shameful and the donkey was considered to be a very lowly animal. People could not understand why anyone would worship someone who died so shamefully and he also rode a donkey into Jerusalem with the people laying palm fronds in front of him as though he was a king on a majestic mount. So, a crucified man with the head of a donkey was used to represent Jesus (Yeshua).
Corrections and Omissions:
Enoch wasn't some fantastic discovery from a single source. There are manuscripts of it in multiple different collections and it's a part of the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo church.
Gnostics weren't a sect of Christianity. The term "gnostic" is a label of convenience that we use these days to refer to a number of somewhat diverse texts and purported belief systems, largely because a guy who wrote a letter had a real mad on for them. Given their notions of secret knowledge they most likely represented an approach to Christianity that took the form of a mystery cult (like Freemasons or Scientologists). Early Christianity was quite a bit more diverse than you seem to be giving it credit for. Specifically, there was no orthodoxy of any sort. It basically started out with "Once upon a time there was this rad zombie," and derivative traditions kind of ran with it however they wanted to. The specific elements that made the zombie rad or even the general disposition of the zombie were pretty variable.
"Gnosticism" also didn't necessarily originate from Christianity so far as we can tell. The exact origins aren't nailed down, but the influences that formed it definitely predated the origins of Christianity, with potential Neoplatonic, Persian, and Buddhist faiths all contributing to its formation. To my untrained eye it sure does look like a cosmology as complex and sharply deviant from now-orthodox Christianity probably had to come from somewhere and didn't emerge all by itself, but that's just the guess of one idiot.
The only evidence we have that the Nag Hamadi library was deliberately hidden to avoid persecution is the aforementioned mad on. It's entirely likely that the manuscripts are just regular old burial trappings. With no orthodoxy there would be no organized church and therefore no body to execute any specific persecution.
It's pronounced BAR-bel-oh. There's a complex cosmology that a lot of the so called gnostic texts share. In this case, Barbelo is kind of a confusing concept, since it is characterized as both an entity and a plane of existence. Suggesting that Jesus emerged from the realm of Barbelo thus lands somewhere between Docetist and Arian belief, both of which were still contested subjects even after Constantine adopted Christianity as the state religion of Rome. I suggest that this argues even more strongly that there wasn't any specific, directed persecution aimed at Christian mystery cults even then.
The Gospel of Judas isn't as kind to Judas as you indicate. While he's the only one among the disciples who recognizes Jesus as an emanation from Barbelo and as generally opposed to the Demiurge, Jesus still treats him like a child and basically pats him on the head and tells him to run along. Jesus is actually kind of an ass in that one.
One theory of Mark that you don't get into deserves mention. Christians wanted to differentiate themselves from Jews early on, and one of the ways that they did that was in the form of the documents that they kept their scripture on. Jews used scrolls and Christians used codices (books). One hypothesis holds that one of the earliest versions of Mark (from which the ones we have derived) had a page that simply fell out. Indeed - highlighting a difference in tone between Mark and Matthew/Luke (the three Synoptic Gospels) then poses some tension with what is still accepted as the most likely formation of authorship - the two-document hypothesis. If some redactor were to combine Mark (or proto-Mark) with an hypothesized sayings gospel (Q), it would still leave open the question of where the end of the narrative would have come from, since sayings gospels are specifically NOT narrative in their construction. Given that most of the widely accepted theories assume Marcan priority, however, if we're going to consider Matthew and Luke as derivatives (because they do inherit things from Mark) that would seem to imply the existence of a lost synoptic gospel.
Thank god you wrote this, now I don't have to!!
This is fascinating, is there a book or books that serve as entry points into some of these details of early Christian life?
Gonna start a band called "Rad Zombie" lol
@@RabidHobbit The best book I can think of is "Gnosticism: New light on the ancient tradition of inner knowing" by Hoeller. It's an intro to Gnosticism, but also describes how diverse peoples' beliefs were at the time. It gave me a better sense of what the world was like for the Gnostics, who generally considered themselves Christian. I am a noob, but this book was sort of an entry point for me.
There is a book called "My Lives with Lucifer, Satan, Hitler & Jesus" - it is a tough read and 18+ only - gives an another perspective to the life of Jesus & his mission... The author is Kim Michaels...
I need more videos on this topic!!!
Thank you, Trey. Your time in researching and your efforts to share your findings are much appreciated. I agree that this information need not make us question the word of God, but leads us to look for witnesses which stand together to verify the truth of God. So often, people take offense at the eighth Article of Faith of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints which states "8 We believe the Bible to be the word of God as far as it is translated correctly; we also believe the Book of Mormon to be the word of God."
People often falsely assume that such a statement diminishes the authenticity and worth of the Bible. Not so. It is simply being honest. I revere both the Old and New Testaments and love studying them as I do the Book of Mormon. One can hear the voice of the Ultimate Author in all of them. I want all of His word I can get, especially in the face of the mists of darkness creeping over the earth.
Thanks again for sharing.